New XPRIZE for Quantum Computing
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 май 2024
- Learn more about quantum computing on Brilliant! First 30 days are free and 20% off the annual premium subscription when you use our link ➜ brilliant.org/sabine.
Elon Musk launched an XPRIZE for Quantum Applications! It’s a 3-year, 5 million dollar global contest that’s looking for ways to use quantum computers to solve real-world challenges that benefit society. Doesn't this basically mean quantum computers don’t currently have any good use cases? And what do you need to do to win? Let’s have a look.
🤓 Check out my new quiz app ➜ quizwithit.com/
💌 Support me on Donatebox ➜ donorbox.org/swtg
📝 Transcripts and written news on Substack ➜ sciencewtg.substack.com/
👉 Transcript with links to references on Patreon ➜ / sabine
📩 Free weekly science newsletter ➜ sabinehossenfelder.com/newsle...
👂 Audio only podcast ➜ open.spotify.com/show/0MkNfXl...
🔗 Join this channel to get access to perks ➜
/ @sabinehossenfelder
🖼️ On instagram ➜ / sciencewtg
#science #sciencenews #quantumcomputer #elonmusk #physics 
Наука
Let's run Doom on it.
Technically, Doom can run on a potato.
Pong with four paddles is what the cool kids dig
No, it must run Crysis. Only then we can be sure it's a Quantum Computer.
It feels like doom is the plan.
@@albirtarsha5370 or the end result
Quantum Computers are a great example of a solution looking for a problem.
technically there's always been 1 application- simulating atoms and molecules for chemistry and materials science applications.... I mean the whole original point of Q computer was solve Schrodinger's Equation for non-trivial Hamiltonians
no they can be used for quantum computing, we need that shit. its legit the future
@@thinkingcitizenok nerd - JK
Its NOT even a sulution yet! .. it doesn't work at scale required
@@metju30 AI will make it work, also 4D calculations are just the tip of the iceberg
New drinking game. Down a shot each time Sabine says "but let's not be cynical". Four invocations sufficed for Elon to appear (remotely).
I believe that was intentional...because there's lots of reason to by cynical.
Forget "computer says no" my liver says no.
For Musk and Pinchat it would be solve virtualization of the real world in order to create autonomous vehicles.
The real drinking-game is taking a shot of Jägermeister every time she says 'Einstein.'
You would get drunker if you quaffed a beverage each time you hear the word QUANTUM!!!
we need quantum computers to simulate a quantum computer simulated reality and prove we are in a quantum computer simulated reality
Nice 😊
can we also use them to simulate the immense joy the Earth would have if Musk were to be sent on a one way trip to Mars?
Epic. From now on, you're incharge of everything....Seriously.
You've earned the millions. But don't do it cynically.
Red Pill or Blue Pill?
Are those that submit going to relinquish their rights to the developed work product? For five million? That's tip money to Musk and Pichia.
Yes. It's the same scam musky boy tried to pull with his hyperloop competition nonsense. Give up your novel discovery to him in exchange for a pittance and a chance to kiss elon's caboose.
No it's only for the potential to win. Most likely they get nothing. The real winner could already be amongst musks inner circle...😆
I don't know why my comment keeps getting deleted but essentially yes. Elon tried to pull the same ish with his hyperloop -scam- competition but it went nowhere. Turns out it's pretty hard to invent vapourware.
I'd say that is musk's standard MO.😏
Okay, okay. Such a tough negotiator. He said he'd throw in a cyber truck too, subject to availability.
I really like your YT content and also enjoyed your book Existential Physics. Your approach is a real breath of fresh air. Thank you for just being human.
The most annoying aspect of following technological research news is that every new discovery is greeted with rosy predictions of potential use cases. In the majority of cases, they are either technically infeasible or have no potential for cost effectiveness. The more money someone needs to develop a technology, the less practical the imagined use cases. I've long been skeptical of quantum computing, and I hope this contest will illuminate, rather than obfuscate. The applications should be both practical and cost effective, and capable of actual demonstration, as opposed to theoretical.
Not to be cynical, but if quantum computers ever prove to be useful, the first application will clearly be military.
First application for a new tech has historically been sex, military, making money, or scamming investors. Right now, we are in the scamming investors phase from what I can see.
Since the general and bankers are not hopping mad about quantum computer, my guess, it s still useless. Bitcoin will survive a bit longer i guess.
@bricolagefantasy7291 same was true about spaceflight despite it being likely the most important thing we can even hope to start affecting, ever since the 90s
Absolutely.. just like everything else.
Nope. The first consideration for any new technology is it applicable for porn.
protein folding prediction, and multi-dimensional Tetris
because the X prize for Hyperloop worked out so well^^
. . . a rather premature assessment. . .
Thank you!!!
@@dewiz9596 Uh, been 30 years yo.
1. Not related. The Hyperlook white paper and companies already existed when they offered up an x-prize for better designs.
2. There are a dozen Hyperloop companies around the world with half of them working on contracts to build in various countries.
3. Haha for a typical failed what-about
@@thomasjones4570 All hail the white paper
I just saw an article where researchers used a D-Wave quantum annealer to assist ML in optimizing a multi-layer coating to make glass reflect most infrared while remaining very transparent to visible wavelengths. That would revolutionize all windows, solar panels, etc.
Solving quantum gravity! We need that!
Yep, and she has ideas for that
Which brings up the interesting question whether quantum gravity would have any social benefit...
@@Thomas-gk42 Exactly it's the perfect alignment of interests!
We also need an equation to be solved ^^
@@SabineHossenfelder I'd wager that it would have huge benefits, just look at what Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity allowed us to achieve in just a few decades! Imagine how much further they could take us if we managed to make them work together! And that's without taking into account the possibility that it could lead to new physics!
4:24 Cue Dr Evil: "ONE MILLION DOLLARS!"
It's understandable to be pessimistic about the result of a project while remaining skeptical, rather than cynical, about the intents and motivations that went into the design. By skeptical here I mean "in proportion to the evidence" which also applies well when little evidence is available.
When it comes to Elon, his interactions with World Food Program and MacKenzie Scott give me the sense that he is pessimistic about the "get your hands dirty" method of world improvement because he is cynical about the motivations of others, and he is naive about the feasibility of tech solutions to modern problems. Very much treating the symptoms, at least from my perspective.
He is leading two giant tech companies that are mainly hardware based. I think it is fair to assume he has a good grasp on trade-off and real world solutions.
At least way more than any scientist in the quantum computer space would have. Musk spend a lot if his time talking to engineers and not scientist that's probably why he wants quantum tech to move to engineering and not stay forever in labs.
@Tsagan I certainly don't mean to dismiss Musk out of hand, but I do think it worth distinguishing among tech competencies, management competencies, philanthropic competencies, and ethical competencies. Someone could be the best in the world at tech and management, and when those conflict with the other two, might naturally default to those strengths to maximize money gained and tech solutions. If all tech titans behave in such a way, people may end up dependent on tech solutions and fall through the cracks where philanthropy would have provided a solution. "money = value" is a useful myth until too many people believe it.
@@alieninmybeverage Being dependent on philanthropy is like relying on the lottery for income-it’s hit or miss and doesn’t address the root of the problem. The market, driven by the principle that money equals value, has proven to be the most effective tool for human prosperity. It’s not a myth; it’s the mechanism that has propelled us to unprecedented heights. To profit in the market, you must offer a product that’s worth more to the buyer than the price paid. This isn’t exploitation; it’s the essence of a fair exchange. Good tech solutions are a prime example-they often provide far more value than their cost, benefiting both parties. The market isn’t a zero-sum game.
@@Tsagan Musk is as close to comic book villain as you can get in real life. Musk has only one motivation - his ego. He doesn't care about humanity, development etc. And no, he is not "leading two giant tech companies", most of his time he spends propping up bigotry content on his new toy social media, meeting with world authoritarian leaders, siphoning money from NASA to use in his toy rocket projects etc. Only thing he is leading is his personality cult of minions who would cheer and clap to every absurd "achievement" of his, be it Clustertruck, giant rocket which exploded every time it is launched, narrow tunnel with cars posing as greatest development, plagiarized neuralink experiments from 20 years ago etc etc.
@@Tsagan "Musk spend a lot if his time talking to engineers" Nope, most of his talking is in soft ball interviews and streams with fanboys. If he ever talked to his engineers in other way than simply giving them orders, there wouldn't be such things like starship and cybertruck. If he ever listened to his lawyers, he wouldn't end up losing so much money in lawsuits. If he ever listened to his finance advisers, he wouldn't end up buying and tanking Twitter. Unfortunately all his failures are overcompensated by his only skill of cult management.
Do most innovations start this way-making something and then trying to figure out what to do with it?
In the software industry we call this Solution Probleeming.
No
Necessity is the mother of invention.
DEI, NEVER SOLVED ANYTHING
At least in the field of maths, the maths usually comes first, only then does an application of the math appear when someone connects the dots.
The definition of an engineer is: A solution in search of a problem.
I think the traveling salesperson problem may be a good fit for quantum computing. I think the difficulty for standard computers lies in the fact that there can be multiple routes of equal efficiency and standard computers work in terms of one or the other must be the correct one. It seems that for solutions which have some parts that are non-negotiable and some parts which can be exchanged with no penalty the quantum advantage would be in developing the entire set of changeable solution components using just one cycle to generate multiple possible solution components.
I speak of none but the computer that is to come after me, a computer whose merest operational parameters I am not worthy to calculate-and yet I will design it for you. A computer that can calculate the Question to the Ultimate Answer
Something artsy, the Eden project was cool, can we make a monolithic pi counter with a D̶i̶g̶i̶t̶a̶l̶ quantum clock on the side ran on a nuclear fusion generator, no maintenance allowed, try and predict when its going to break and have pools on what will break first. Place bets your great grand kids will be cashing out, instant tourist hotspot!
Come see how far along in pi it is, compare the number with your friends!
Based
RIP Douglas Adams.
I'm a quantum computer from future. So time travel is an app. :)
42! :)
As usual, the only important thing is how to sell to the people, things even if those have no practical use (yet). It's quite alike selling refrigerators to poor amazonian indians before any electrification reaches... and yes, WE are the poor buyers. Specially when some "magical" mantras are thrown arround everywhere.
One day Amazon Fresh shopping carts will do quantum addition on the prices, and some lucky people will pay less for their groceries or even zero. Supermarkets will become the new casinos.
@@sluggo206 Does being lucky mean you have an Indian friend that works as an AI?
@@thearpox7873 No, it means that quantum fluctuations will result in a total charge that's lower or higher than the sum of all the item prices.
Amazing solution in search for relevant problems. Ok, been there, done it myself (too many times, I’m afraid 😬)
At 2:28 I could swear she said "this quantest" and I love that
As an undergrad, limited knowledge if that wasn't already clear, my take on the subject has been 'Let's do it anyways, just because it's cool and it could be useful'. There are plenty of things that were developed or discovered and they were found to be useful much later on. This has happened alot in the field of mathematics.
Good point. Also, quantum computers have already forced us to come up with better encryption algorithms, that's worth something, right?
@@Takyodor2 Better? No. Some encryption algorithms with perceived weaknesses against quantum computing have been deprecated. If it turns out that quantum threat is not real, then we just wasted time and money. If it turns real, then no real benefit in encryption field, remaining algorithms were developed long before quantum computing hype.
Mathematics usually costs less than this. For a start, mathematics research simply requires you to give up a social life, whereas quantum computing research requires zillions in funding for exotic materials, labs and cooling equipment. And so far, maths has actually proved to be quite useful.
@@AG-ig8uf entanglement allows "true privacy" though, rendering all encryption algorithms used for direct communication as useless, just as attempts to breach them
Hey, some bloke in Scotland needed to pump water out of a mine, the problem presented itself first, did he have ANY CLUE what he opened up!?
The grin @5:31 was priceless :-)
It's literally PERFECT to calculate Morals. Tiiny amounts of energy, that hide behind "Big ideas".
I would argue that any claim to 'perfect morals' is inherently immoral.
i use quarks all the time
I use sparkles ....they shine
3:41 usable Quantum computers will be on line and solving problems one week after we have a practical fusion reactor.😊
oh what a hillarious "suttle" take down of the quantum computing reality mirage.
Maybe there's a way to make Monte Carlo transport solutions more accurate via quantum simulations of particle interactions with the nucleus.
The best use of a quantum computer is to predict Schrödinger's cat's favorite food.
Well we aren't gay enough to think..
If one examines some of the statements about qm it could be considered misleading.
Schrodingers cat. They imply the cat is both alive and dead:)))
No its one or the other: its just not known bu the observer
lol, love your candid conversations with Elon!
Not that I know ship about quantum computing. But if tracking economics is possible then maybe we can track the movements of the solar system while simultaneously calculating what we think would be gravitational waves on the fabric of space. These pathways between celestial body's should provide a sort of highway between planets that future ships may be able to take advantage of.
And if not it should still give us a better understanding of the fabric of space and how spinning bodies effect each other.
Dna mapping.
Wave collapse powered brute force problem solving. Maybe self assembling and replicating robots for a dyson sphere
Is the telephone not going to ring? 5:08 there we go thanks the wave function has collapsed now
Interesting. An example of the wave function collapsing due to an expectation rather than an observation
Use QCs to figure out what QCs can be used for.
While also using QCs to build better QCs
Been waiting for a working and useful quantum computer. Seems to be receding into obscure and questionably useful applications.
3:22
Quantum chemistry. How about quantum molecular biology?
Nanoparticles with unusual surface characteristics...
You just gave me something to think on for days!
I just want to take a moment to appreciate Sabine here - she earns from an ad of her Brilliant course promoted on a video she made! Such an inspiration!
Straight-up, if I do come up with a usage for quantum computers (and I might), there's no way in hell I'd just hand it over to super-rich dudes for (relative) pocket change.
You could use them to mine the remaining bitcoin. Don't tell anyone.
I would assume the best use for a contest like that though would be medical applications. But idk
There was a time when computationally, SMP wasn't well understood and didn't scale well at all. In fact, the flux between processors hardware tailored to their tasks (problem sets) and large arrays of generic processing elements continues. But SMP is now more efficiently used to mimic vector or grid via plain "heap"-style processing. For a while, processors kept getting faster, putting off the need for SMP. But now most PCs are multi-core and multi-thread, so consumer OS's must adapt and continue doing so.
Quantum may play out similarly but over a much longer timescale because SMP will scale with increased efficiency in resource allocation and power dissipation. We will need to know how to use quantum if or when that time comes, and the algorithms can be developed before the hardware.
And when that fails we still have liquid nitrogen advantage :P
I believe the million+ qubit QCs will be the most in demand for solving the protein folding problems. So biolabs and pharma companies will become the first commercial consumers. Antiviral drugs, immunocorrectors, etc., etc.
A quantum algorithm for designing conventional computing systems and algorithms that eliminate quantum advantage...
Blah blah blah blah blah lies..... The best reject it ....
I asked Claude3 if building and operating the quantum computer in space would solved some of the problems like refrigeration and problems caused by the environment like magnetic field etc. The answer was yes but new problems would arise but easier to solve. Any thoughts ?
Cosmic rays are going to be a problem
Îm just one of those annoying fans of science that failed physics in 10th grade so I learned to play guitar. I think outside the box because I am not allowed near the box and 99,99999% of the time it’s absolute rubbish and a proof I barely understand the box is a 3 dimensional square so my idea is to be taken with a grain of salt but thank you very much for acknowledging my question I will print out your answer and hang it on my wall 😁
Beyond the technical feats, how do we ensure these advancements are accessible and beneficial for society at large, particularly in sectors like healthcare and environmental science?
Thanks!
How about a quantum plan on ending war.
War is big business. If peace broke out, countries would go bankrupt.
Easy! Just fix ressource inequalities, climate change migration, end corruption, balance demographics and power, erase history.
Time travel.
That's it!
@@SabineHossenfelder sadly, I don't know the difference between a qbit and a ding-dong.
We already have time travel.....forwards 😢😅
@@christophernicolson5086I haven't lost my sense of humor.
@@aaronjennings8385 You need a rama-lama before you can understand
Hi Sabine, thank you for the video. Do you have any suggestions in how to start to study quantum chemistry? Besides quantum mechanics. Thank you.
They should try reinterpreting numbers, how they’re read them, from active to undefined
It's likely than any successful application of quantum computers will just motivate development of better heuristics for conventional computers that solve the same problem almost as well for orders of magnitude less cost. Or the quantum computers just end up generating training data for conventional machine learning.
The conventional computer is always very based.
1/0 is all you need. And can be as complex as want. Ask the universe.
That actually doesn’t seem likely, there would absolutely be plausibility for new applications to emerge that provide solutions to problems and can deal with more variables to solve bigger equations and handle bigger processes. What we need it for is a storage of information as well after many scientific breakthroughs.
The most powerful force in our society is greed, hoarding wealth is still just hoarding. Classism is the real problem.
There will always be "classes" to think anything otherwise is naive and delusional, some people are just more valuable and give more value than others
@@nathansuss so why are upper class people born into wealth, who contribute little or nothing are so allowed to avoid paying their fair share?? The very definition of classism is to claim economic discrimination and economic exploitation seem natural and inevitable. What. I see is unethical actions based on greed. Completely unacceptable in a society based on equalitarianism and rule of law.
You made a significant effort to not be cynical, Sabine. Props to you!
I thought the only use of Quantum Computers was to break all the encryption in internet to make it so unsafe that we can never again use it to communicate or do e-commerce, basically going back to the caves, while the rich people enjoy their AI waifus and unlimited (also unpaid) labor.
Nice to know that we're thinking in what to do with Quantum Computers after that
Maybe finally solve NS equations for weather forecast so we will never again be dressed for the wrong weather ☝️😌... Musk gimme the moneyz!😏
There are way too many people talking about quantum computation and worshipping Elon Musk. It would be better to talk about something different for a change LIKE reversible computation. Reversible computation is the future of computation. And if Musk is interested in this stuff, then I am out since Musk is the guy behind many scams and shady things.
Some days I think this channel is the best thing that happened to RUclips. Today is one of these days.
Already submitted my entry to XPrize. Told them that quantum computers are basically useless. Hope to win and get the $5 million main prize.
If you think your idea is better, we can look at it. I got a test that will break your quantum algorithm. It is not some Shor's shit!
#SabineHossenfelder - Suggestions for you and your team from a professional New York actor: The rule in performance comes in 3s - "But let's not be cynical" repeated 3 times and not more. - Change the vocal energy for each of the 3, heading into more desperate and loud OR slower and more detailed. - After the conversation on the phone and hanging up, HOLD the stare at the camera. -
Time for new song: "Let's not be cynical" "cynical" ohh yes......ohh. yes. Please explain us how this thing work? I can't understand how can you take measurement and then you dont know what you will read, but when you read, it's not what was expected. How you save data as qbit?
So that's to the tune of "Physical" by the late Olivia Newton-John, the granddaughter of Nobel prize physicist Max Born, who came up with the Born Rule of quantum physics? It all comes together.
Remember how a regular computer works. You want to add two numbers, but all the computer has are transistors with high or low voltages. So you translate your numbers to binary, 0s and 1s. Then you store them as voltages in a line of transistors. Then your algorithm manipulates those voltages as if they were numbers. You have to know what hardware the computer has. If it has logic gates then you XOR two voltages to add bits, and you AND two voltages to decide if there is a carry bit. In the end you read out a string of voltages as binary, and convert that back to your total number. Of course, this is all built into computers now.
Quantum computers are even more complicated. I don't understand any quantum algorithms. But you have a system you want to manipulate. All the computer has are quantum spins, and ways to work on those spins. It is your algorithm, so you encode your data as spins, or superpositions. Maybe entangle some of the spins. A spin might be pointed in some x,y,z direction on a Bloch sphere. You might rotate the imaginary sphere so that z now points to x. Then rotate y around the z-axis 180 degrees to the -y direction. And so on.
But this is quantum mechanics, so each spin has a probability of pointing in each direction. You read out its value in the z direction, or whatever you are interested in. Then you do the entire thing over and over to get the actual percentage in the z direction of each qbit. Then you translate that out as the answer to your problem. You cannot store qbits for long, you have to read them out.
Because if you teach everything to the A.I about quantam algorithms and the A.I is able to understand it and learn from it then learn quantam problem solving skills and algorithm skills it would be able to generate new algortihms for quantam computing
There is only one good use case, attempt to stimulate the emergence of consciousness and screening of discrete to continuous processes. Can microtubuals resonate with quantum fields or not? Does gravity transfer between the two or not, for example
I'm a development professional currently spending a small percentage of my time working on quantum optimisation models for better food production. It has some potential.
Rest In Particles Peter Higgs.
I got it!
I have to factor large numbers on next week’s algebra test. Quantum computers are great at that, and I could use one to get a good grade on my test. And that would make my mom happy. And when mom is happy, the world is a much better place.
Send me my prize.
Vvvery intereeesting!
"But let's not be cynical" Cynical: the term I use to describe people who are negative toward things about which I am positive. One the other hand, if they are positive and I am negative, I refer to them as naive. Hmm, maybe those terms tell people more about me than about the people that I criticize.
It´s not the Elon-prize, but thanks for a splendid video and all the work, you and your team do for us.
Many thanks from the entire team!
We are already part of a quantum computer simulation.😮❤
No one would invest a dime in quantum computers if not for Shor algorithm
It's Musk, the only benefit that matters is his benefit.
Quantum computing research is one of those areas where it will likely require applications to be found post-innovation, in many cases.
For instance, there will likely need to be materials created to support a working quantum computer. Those materials may be of benefit in other applications, as was the case with other material inventions, like Duct Tape or even the pen.
I know there has been some promise in its application to PNT sensors. If those mature into a usable product, I can see that being used for humanitarian efforts, for instance.
If it ever does get to a point where it can do computing at a large scale, the medical industry would likely be able to leverage that greatly.
I can understand being skeptical of those that over-promise results before a product are available for testing. But this is an area of research that makes sense to pour money into because the potential benefits are huge. It is worth taking a chance with some amount of money to see where it goes.
When you started talking about photosynthesis I first thought it was about the creation of computer generated pictures 🙈
Are Elon Musks even good for something?
- Optimization algorithms that our entire industrial infrastructure depends on could give more accurate results with astronomically lower computational time.
- Complex simulations would become significantly faster.
- The list goes on
I think the fertilizer and solar cell problems are discrete optimization use cases.
how do you design an algorithm for the mentioned forms of contributing if none of the contestants have access to a quantum computer to test the contributions on before submitting? because all good with the math... but you need the hardware to test, even in princible...
and about photosynthesis.. then they have more reason to chop every single tree on thr planet, so they can build the machines on top of them that do the same thing
The more we're prompted to not be cynical, the more I suspect Sabine is really cynical about it. But - let's not be cynical...
good idea on Musk part, let us see what people suggest
I get the strong feeling that there is a meta physics reason that not much can really be correctly expected from quantum computing. But they will waste a lot of time and effort finding that out eventually. Something to do with information. They expect to use quantum uncertainty to find certainty?
It's more about like how imaginary numbers help mathematicians make some complicated calculations with answers in real numbers. Quantum theory is for physics and chemistry like imaginary numbers is for mathematics. So quantum computing should be the same kind of deal for computers. At least so they think. But I suspect you might very well be right. Maybe it actually isn't possible.
I don't know what they expect. But equation after equation untill there is no connection to reality.
@@Syphirioththis is literally every bit of software, worse there even, since there isnt any physical reality there, just social demands which are then abstracted again and again.
For running simulations perhaps or some new form of blockchain tech
Perfect. Useless tech running on useless tech.
@@fwiffo how is blockchain useless though? If you don’t respond I’ll just assume you don’t understand blockchain or don’t have an answer.
"There's a reason these guys are rich"
Fraud?
Yet nobody else in their position would do anything differently, people are so narcissistic to think they could do better
@@nathansuss Strawman much?
I bet you would have let Madoff handle your investments, circa 2005, "There's a reason he's rich . . . "
"There's a reason Trump is rich."
"There's a reason SBF is rich . . ."
"There's a reason Holmes . . . "
Musk is a fraudster. TSLA is a pump n dump, and he continues to overpromise and under deliver with not only Tesla but every other business he runs.
@@Xelbiuj_1988 Lol you're completely right tho, there's a reason those people are rich morally bankrupt or not, the average person would be just as morally bankrupt as them. I hate people who think they'd be morally superior when they would likely be just as bad.
@@nathansuss Do you have any defense of crime/fraud that isn't a strawman or just, "no you!"?
@@Xelbiuj_1988 as for Elons companies, you're just plain delusional, I couldn't convince you even if I tried, reusable, sustainable and affordable rockets, energy storage, solar, electric vehicles, brain chips to interface with technology that would cure tons of disabilities and eventually upgrade all humans
This is like when Edison challenged Nikolai Tesla to solve his issues. Whoever solves this ends up losing if they give Elon the info. He is the Edison of his time.
Liar
@@davidmaddon554 Look at what he is doing with his money. ruining kids perceptions since he knows children are cognitively and psychological defenseless against advertising. don't forget the root of his money is from south African blood money and government backing lets get real and have role models that care about the species and not just money.
@@Darron_Matsumotoyour picture of Musk that you paint may scratch your itch but that is not a true picture of Musk and his companies. Tesla cars work well. SpaceX rockets fly well. Electrical storage is real and works. His father is not the source of his money.
@@Darron_MatsumotoSouth African blood money TF U smoking?
@@Darron_Matsumotohis money coming from African blood money? 😂 Some people are a complete joke.. tell me who made zip2 and how much that sold for... Tell me who made x,com in 1999 which merged a few times, then became PayPal, and how much eBay bought that for. Yeah I'm sure his money came from some emerald mine 🤣🤣
When Musk finally realized what a computer is (or is NOT)😅. He was pretty excited about quantum computing in Joe Rogan show.
People forget. Feelings are chemical reactions not the chemicals themselves
Ye and they are triggered by input into the brain. Which send signal to release. Which send signal to brain again. All at the speed of light or something ;)
I love this fact. it's not input ouput. it's input. output. input. output. and thats the experience.
Is Musk even good for something?
Next, Musk will say that he knows more about quantum computing than anybody else in the planet, after stealing yet another idea.
I’m surprised Donald T hasn’t already claimed to be “really really great at quantum computing, in fact, there is no one who understands quantum computing better than me…”
Thank God for Sabine!
3:21 - And materials used in constructing quantum computers - turn the problem back on itself...
Musk is a smart man, he thinks outside the box and has the means to voice his (sometimes unpopular) opinion without fear of censorship. And this is a good thing in a world we are increasingly hearing fewer voices and opinions that differ from the hegemony.
Where is the punchline?
True
Is Musk even good for something? Anything?
He's only leading like 4 industries
@nathansuss literally anyone can do the "work" he is doing. For example, I personally didn't throw away $40 billion for a joke. That automatically makes me more qualified to run a company than that moronic bafoon.
Lmao awkward jealous comment weird planet
Find all the transparent dirt cheep alloys, like tin berilium with titanium tubeless making it polarized. Solving for prime reduction in infinity base cohesive transform simplicies. Do screws actually chase each other when they fall on the floor? Can an Sig Fig array of alloy resistive distance can be used in 33 metal pick 10 million alloy sin cos tan 1mm 128 bit four opp; comp add mult, compare add mul, trans shift?
The only use case I can think of is neural network training. It could need less trial and error.
Despite all the financial struggles i and my family faced, everything is finally falling into place! $47,000 weekly profit and riches I'll always praise the Lord...
Same here, with my current portfolio made from my investments with my personal financial advisor I totally agree with you
Wow! Kind of in shock you mentioned expert, elizabeth ann graney.What a coincidence!!!
Elizabeth Ann has really set the standard for others to follow, we love her here in the UK as she has been really helpful and changed lots of life's
Life is easier when the cash keeps popping in,thanks to Elizabeth Ann graney services.glad she's getting the recognition she deserves
I use to work 3 jobs,full time at Walmart,a server at night and Lyft on the weekend,until Elizabeth Ann graney change my story.
I’m so tired of Elon though.
Why?
@@CausalDiscoveries He wants to be more important than what he is. Always has to be seen heard talked about etc. Ppl like that, no thanks
He’s pretty darn important. No? What makes you think his focus is only popularity?
I have tried to understand how quantum computer works several times, and I realized it is beyond my understanding, not the physical components themselves, the benefit of having a third position between one and zero for calculation.
I haven't taken Sabine's Brilliant course either, but I suppose it has to do with probabilities. If you start with a state of 0.4 (40% likely to be true) and add something with a state of 0.6 and others (by "add" I don't mean addition but some kind of logical operation), the result may be something analogous to the average. So if the result is above 0.5 and rounds (decoheres) to 1, that may be useful, Or at least it's more interesting than flipping a coin and gets you research funding.
More paths to choose. Thats about it.
But they better figure out what is deciding the path first instead of having a computer whith an electro magnetic field arround it that might affect that path again.
I watched a youtube video that claimed to be able to show the benefit of quantum computing compared to a classical computer. I thought, yes, finally, I might have a chance at understanding it. The problem was simple, 4 cards, one is a queen, write a program to find the queen. Your average number of tries to solve was 2.something. I understand the algorithm. The presenter then went on to say quantum computing will solve the same problem in 1 try. The went on to other aspects of computing. I immediately started the video over convinced I must of missed something, I didn't. Then I watched to the end thinking he must of explained it later in the video, he didn't. I then started reading all the commenters complaining about the same thing. I'm still completely confused. I've only got maybe 25 years left to live, it is on my bucket list.
@@markvalery8632 Well did you take in the factor that an electric device creates it's own field?
@@Syphirioth I've done analog and microwave IC design for decades. I just don't understand how "electric device creates it's own field" has anything to do with quantum computing and the algorithms that allow the solution to fall out in one step. Did you think your statement helped explain that?
There was a paper published a few years ago that showed calculating the binding energy of mettalic organic frameworks became more efficient using a hybrid quantum algorithm around 30 logical qubits. IonQ and Quantinuum are basically one iteration away from that threshold. It won't be the sexy shor's algorithm type quantum supremacy but I think they'll start playing a larger role in research soon. I expect it will be a gradual quiet transistion and one day we'll all wake up and be like "oh yea, I guess we are using quantum computers now".
This is nothing but another grift by Musk. The world is tired of Elon.
I'm not tired of Elon.
One good use for Quantum Computers is their role in sci-fi movies.....
Maybe it's going to be saved for a future video, but I was a little disappointed to not at least hear a mention of how quantum computing theoretically works very well at decrypting data because it can factor so many numbers at once or some such. If I remember it correctly, entire "sections of numbers" can be much more quickly factored than a traditional computer. Forgive me, it's been a while since I looked at this. - or at least how they want it to work, Google informs me: It's important to note that as of January 2022, large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computers capable of running Shor's algorithm to break RSA encryption have not yet been realized.
live long and prosper, dr h - you are generally a reliable smile
So far, the only practical application that seems possible to me is when it comes to cyber-security. Beyond that, it all seems "pie in the sky."
also cyber attacks (lol)
@@FireWizzrobe Same thing. If it weren't for attacks, you wouldn't need security.