That is absolutely amazing, the door plug didn't fall off, the battery didn't catch fire, the rear wheels didn't fall off, the front landing gear didn't collapse, was it really a Boeing?
okay then - how impressive that there were airbuses flying today, can't believe it didn't have a nose gear collapse, have an electrical failure causing it to nearly collide with another aircraft, have a right main landing gear issue, have a full gear collapse, crash after a dual-engine failure due to a gear issue from a gear-up landing and have the nose gear rotate 90 degrees during landing . (Wikipedia, list of accidents and incidents involving the A320 family) "aRe tHOsE AiRcrAfT fLyiNg ReALLy AIrBusEs??"
They landed about 10 feet from the start(end) of the “runway.” You know this is a visual approach due being not a real airport. When the runway is the same color as the ground, it makes judging very difficult.
No, because navigation is via GPS. Even the backup system (inertial navigation) does not rely upon the magnetic field. Only the airplane's magnetic compass does.
Well said. I’m a pilot and understand that GPS vertical accuracy suffers in the polar regions (making instrument approaches impractical) but otherwise the GPS is quite dependable for both aviation and scientific purposes.
It can mess with the ins calibration if the plane is moved or changes orientation much while shut down. But as long as you have the GPS signal you'll know the starting point you can get the IRS aligned like normal.
Not at all! As we know, a few yrs ago the earth magnetic axle moved to the East in Siberia’s direction. But that has nothing to do with navigation, at least not with Russian navigation. The US is over complicate everything, and in the main time the Russians got ahead in everything. Just saying! To all the specialists and experts I have something to tell, back to the basics never sounded so right than in the American navigation or airplain building. Was the missing F 35 already recovered? Or visiting the old ISS is possible without properly working Russian rocket engines? If anyone could answer my two questions and without scientific BS I would ask the Nobel institute for a medal of honor” answering the most simple questions in this century” that’s all I can say to all the know everything and know better than real pilots about navigations.
I wonder what the flerfs will make of an ordinary commercial airliner land somewhere behind the "Ice Wall". Were the mutant ninja penguin guards were having an off day?
9000 miles from the nearest airport to me that can handle a 787. Plus stopping to refuel each way... maybe 17 hours each way? Naaaah. I don't even want to fly across country anymore.
@@dr.jamesolack8504 Oh, sorry, didn't think it was that hard to understand my overall point. Let me explain it for those of less education... It is an old video, posted recently on this RUclips account. Further, it does not in any way credit the owner/creator of the video. So its old news, not shot or created by this account. Hope that clears it up for you. If you need me to educate you further, please let me know and I'd be happy too.
Well they have to do something with all that Nazi loot they collected during WW2 being Hitlers bankers and "neutral". Oh wait, sorry, that was the Swiss.
Uh hate to break it too ya, but the Norwegian exploration team beat the much more heralded British team to the South Pole. Like in 1909 - whoever's first in such a race pretty much has rights of usage. The entire British team died in their tents just short of the goal, sadly. The Norwegians, led by famed Roald Amundsen, had the advantage because they were more adapted to polar conditions. Heck, if you can hack the North Pole & Arctic Circle, then the South Poles a cinch. You just gotta remember you're upside down and it's all good lol. Seriously there's tons of books in this & a great mini Series "The Last Place on 🌎 Earth" done by ITV.
That is absolutely amazing, the door plug didn't fall off, the battery didn't catch fire, the rear wheels didn't fall off, the front landing gear didn't collapse, was it really a Boeing?
okay then - how impressive that there were airbuses flying today, can't believe it didn't have a nose gear collapse, have an electrical failure causing it to nearly collide with another aircraft, have a right main landing gear issue, have a full gear collapse, crash after a dual-engine failure due to a gear issue from a gear-up landing and have the nose gear rotate 90 degrees during landing . (Wikipedia, list of accidents and incidents involving the A320 family) "aRe tHOsE AiRcrAfT fLyiNg ReALLy AIrBusEs??"
Try not to be so angry and bitter.
@@MaxLai_0104 I only listed some of the Boeing ones this year and we are just 5 months into the year.
787s are just built different
@@MaxLai_0104they took YEARS to happen in those planes. Not 5 or 6 months
They certainly won’t have to worry about running into anything. The runway could be 50 miles long.
Picture Perfect. Smooth as glass. Hard to imagine how the ice / snow can support the plane’s weight.
Antartica is a continent not an ice sheet.
depending on location the ice might be a mile thick.
@zeeshawnali4078...A continent that is covered in giant sheets of ice....
They landed about 10 feet from the start(end) of the “runway.” You know this is a visual approach due being not a real airport. When the runway is the same color as the ground, it makes judging very difficult.
Beautiful landing AND Corduroy, super ❤ this!
That's actually so cool. I would imagine the magnetic field down there messes with the navigation
No, because navigation is via GPS. Even the backup system (inertial navigation) does not rely upon the magnetic field. Only the airplane's magnetic compass does.
Well said. I’m a pilot and understand that GPS vertical accuracy suffers in the polar regions (making instrument approaches impractical) but otherwise the GPS is quite dependable for both aviation and scientific purposes.
@@dogwoodservicesinc.2972 I'm a private pilot with an instrument rating. No plans to fly to the poles. Even on a warm day.
It can mess with the ins calibration if the plane is moved or changes orientation much while shut down. But as long as you have the GPS signal you'll know the starting point you can get the IRS aligned like normal.
Not at all! As we know, a few yrs ago the earth magnetic axle moved to the East in Siberia’s direction. But that has nothing to do with navigation, at least not with Russian navigation. The US is over complicate everything, and in the main time the Russians got ahead in everything. Just saying! To all the specialists and experts I have something to tell, back to the basics never sounded so right than in the American navigation or airplain building. Was the missing F 35 already recovered? Or visiting the old ISS is possible without properly working Russian rocket engines? If anyone could answer my two questions and without scientific BS I would ask the Nobel institute for a medal of honor” answering the most simple questions in this century” that’s all I can say to all the know everything and know better than real pilots about navigations.
Beautiful airliner!👍🏼
Unusual to see a Boeing not shedding parts. I guess sometimes they actually do build planes properly.
Also. Fantastic icy rooster tails.
I work on both BOEING and Airbus aircraft. Both have their problems. It’s unusual to see parts being shedded from any aircraft
Wow! It made it from point A to point B in one piece. Amazing!
Right?!
Hell yeah
It slows down the same as landing on a icy/ snowy asphalt runway, 👍🌹
I wonder what the flerfs will make of an ordinary commercial airliner land somewhere behind the "Ice Wall". Were the mutant ninja penguin guards were having an off day?
How does the plane slow down when landing on ice?
Cmon along on my fantastic voyage slide slide slippity slide
Underrated song.
Guys you should watch my other video too, they are interesting
Hi guys, stay tuned for my newest videos
like this one
ruclips.net/video/hlxIRo7N6g8/видео.html
Hey guys can we try to get my newest video to as many views as this one? ( thank you for watching a lot)
Now, Antarctica is broken. Boeing says they're working on a solution. 🗿
This happened months ago ?
Yeah
Sweet
holy crap
At least this one didn't crash.
9000 miles from the nearest airport to me that can handle a 787. Plus stopping to refuel each way... maybe 17 hours each way? Naaaah. I don't even want to fly across country anymore.
Beautiful 🥰❤️🇺🇲
Thank you! 🤗
Boeing PR needs this so bad right now, you guys.
Ok,now do it in 747 Jumbo.
The anti skid computer had to be working overtime I would think.
Everyone have a look at the world's largest desert.
Larger than a C 141 ??
Pase lo que pase, no toques los frenos.....
Why?
This was six months ago.
I know.
@danielh1708
And???
@@dr.jamesolack8504 Oh, sorry, didn't think it was that hard to understand my overall point. Let me explain it for those of less education... It is an old video, posted recently on this RUclips account. Further, it does not in any way credit the owner/creator of the video. So its old news, not shot or created by this account. Hope that clears it up for you. If you need me to educate you further, please let me know and I'd be happy too.
Thick air
🤍
Ok.
Yes.
Why is Norway in Antarctica at all? They should stick to their own hemisphere.
Well they have to do something with all that Nazi loot they collected during WW2 being Hitlers bankers and "neutral".
Oh wait, sorry, that was the Swiss.
Uh hate to break it too ya, but the Norwegian exploration team beat the much more heralded British team to the South Pole.
Like in 1909 - whoever's first in such a race pretty much has rights of usage.
The entire British team died in their tents just short of the goal, sadly.
The Norwegians, led by famed Roald Amundsen, had the advantage because they were more adapted to polar conditions.
Heck, if you can hack the North Pole & Arctic Circle, then the South Poles a cinch.
You just gotta remember you're upside down and it's all good lol.
Seriously there's tons of books in this & a great mini Series "The Last Place on 🌎 Earth" done by ITV.
@@psalm2forliberty577I knew all that. But they can all get lost now. Go back to their own frozen ice-hole.
@@starpawsy
Very funny !
Then again, I'm not Norwegian lol.
Sven & Ollie might not be so sanguine about your suggestion...
@@psalm2forliberty577 Sven and Ollie are part of the problem.
A gaggle of Boeing haters in this thread. As if THEY could build a better plane.
Edit: Bunch of whining babies needing their diapers changed.
more pollution where we shouldn't have it.