@@mikhailproductions many UEFI firmwares support a technology called CSM (sometimes also referred as Legacy boot), which emulates a BIOS and is thus capable of booting BIOS dependant operating systems
I have done something similar about multibooting.I installed Windows 98 which supports FAT32 but installed on C drive which uses FAT16,then installed NT4.0 on D,then use the Windows 98 bulit-in convert tool converts the C drive to FAT32. After that,the machine failed to boot up due to FAT32 is not supported,but after replace the bootloader with the Windows 2000 one,both system can be booted normally. You can see some interesting result after booting NT4.0. 1.The partition tool don't know which is the boot drive. 2.Some installer program may not function properly due to the C drive is unavaliable,and the Windows 2000 installer still errors even with third party FAT32 support being patched into the OS.
@@patrickjn Windows 7 in fact has partial compatibility with UEFI firmware and GPT partition scheme. A pro of it is performance improves a lot when you use it. But a con of it is if you crack it, known cracking softwares like Windows Loader won't work.
Actually Windows 2k can boot NT 3.xx without any problem but Windows XP can't boot under than NT4 SP6. The problem isn't too much ram nor Win 2k boot. Problem is logical partitions. NT 3.xx can't recognize newly logical partitions and crashs. 0x0000007b means hard-disk boot problems. The solution is use only primary partitions or use different HDD for Windows NT 3.xx with only primary partitions.
@Kernel NT But in my PC i can dual-boot with Win2k boot into WinNT3.xx. If u still not believe, i can upload video to my channel. Because I didnt use logical partition.
What partition style do you have used while creating partition. Is it GPT or MBR? Also which software you use to create bootable USB. Is it Rufus or winsetupfromusb or some other? Which mode do you boot from. Is it legacy or UEFI?
With the right hardware, every single one, with official drivers & all exept for NT 4.0 I think, combo would be any any G45 motherboard with socket 775 and a TPM header, a decent Core 2 Quad to have a good experience in stock windows 11, a good graphics card compatible with XP and up (for previous windows versions just use the G45's GPU, drivers go all the way back to windows 98 probably works on 95 too with some patches, a TPM 2.0 module for the motherboard, one floppy reader, 1 or 2 IDE drives for windows versions prior to XP, one Sata drive for windows XP and up, a cd rom drive to install older OSes, and enough patience to source each part and install all the OSes.
i had a laptop that came with Windows vista that i got to dual boot windows 7, windows 8, and windows 11. (btw i want to someday have a computer that can dual boot Windows XP, Windows 2000, and Windows 7.)
My desktop PC (real hardware) has Windows 7 SP1, Windows 7 build 6801, Windows 7 build 6730, Windows Server 2008(VIsta), Windows Vista Beta 2, Windows XP Media Center Edition 2004, Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005, Windows 95, Windows 3.1, MS-DOS 6.2 on one HDD
26 windows 14 linux 20 others with refind + grub file manager + clover without creating multipat partition. Installing os in vhd and booting directly feom grub file manager ...
You can multi-boot Linux as much as you want as long as you fit within the requirements. Same thing with this video. You'll just need a LOT of storage space, that's all...
Operating systems in this video: Windows NT 4.0 Windows 2000 Windows XP Windows Vista Windows 7 Windows 8 Windows 8.1 Windows 10 Windows 11 Click here and comment which is the best and which is the worst.
for me i almost have the same boot options for me only windows 11 and nt 4 missing but 2000 worked after i installed windows xp but after i installed vista then it just bluescreens now was that the same issiue for you or not? if yes could you tell me how you got it start?
can you tell me my windows 2000 is not working right now so we installed windows 2000 the next is windows xp and so if i add hard disk it will get blue screen of death cuz they are working for scsi and ide, and we can't dualboot windows 2000 and xp for ide
2:31 on surface laptop 3 and pro 6 (only ones ive confirmed are like this) windows 8 wont run. though i was able to get windows server 2012 R2 with no explorer.exe running
@@smd91xx Yes i used patchmem for Windows 98 and ME. For Windows 95, i edited system.ini. Windows 98 and ME saw 2GB RAM but in Windows 95 only saw 900MB RAM.
@Kernel NT I installed DOS-Based OSes at second hard disk. Old NT OSes in first disk. And modern OSes in third disk. İf u ask me how u installed old OSes in SATA mode, luckily i found compatible drivers. So im not lying.
NGL it's impressive that you multi booted until Windows NT 4.0!
I love you 😘
Imagine DOS on UEFI...
gotta enable CSM
Impossible since DOS depends on BIOS
@@mikhailproductions many UEFI firmwares support a technology called CSM (sometimes also referred as Legacy boot), which emulates a BIOS and is thus capable of booting BIOS dependant operating systems
Dos shouldn't be hard to run as it's much simpler than a graphical os
@@_GhostMiner but it's incapable of booting on UEFI, as UEFI wasn't a thing when DOS was released, so DOS isn't a UEFI aware operating system
0:14 got the whole squad laughing
5:14 PPG moment
Yeah bc linux is better
@@yglyglya2 no
@@yglyglya2its cus windows 11 is trash
@@yglyglya2Annndddd you're one of those, what's next, you gonna boast about how you use arch?
I have done something similar about multibooting.I installed Windows 98 which supports FAT32 but installed on C drive which uses FAT16,then installed NT4.0 on D,then use the Windows 98 bulit-in convert tool converts the C drive to FAT32.
After that,the machine failed to boot up due to FAT32 is not supported,but after replace the bootloader with the Windows 2000 one,both system can be booted normally.
You can see some interesting result after booting NT4.0.
1.The partition tool don't know which is the boot drive.
2.Some installer program may not function properly due to the C drive is unavaliable,and the Windows 2000 installer still errors even with third party FAT32 support being patched into the OS.
*- NTDEV:* Let's get nostalgic! _(Runs Windows 7)_
*- Me:* _(Watching this from Windows 7)_ ._. xD
I watched from Windows 2000 SP4 with Chrome and KernelEx :)
Me which first operating system i used was windows 7: ok
I'm on windows 1.0
@@NoahGaming019YTquit your bullshit, windows 1.0 or MSDOS for that matter never had any internet support
@@NoahGaming019YTit doesn't have a _browser_
I read that NTLDR (boot loader used until XP/Vista) can also start 9x windows 🤔
if my memory serves me right, Windows XP(or Windows 2000) 's. ntldr no longer have boot support for NT3.* OSes.
@@linglin92 I multibooted NT 3.x with XP!
@@NovabitsYT how？using grub or something to boot from old version of ntldr or what?
@@linglin92 I made a program for it, called NTPatcher.
@@linglin92 In my video, I didn't use Grub, only official MS Bootloaders.
Well, I once managed to multiboot Windows 7~11 on bare metal (UEFI without CSM btw)
Howww
@@patrickjn Windows 7 in fact has partial compatibility with UEFI firmware and GPT partition scheme. A pro of it is performance improves a lot when you use it. But a con of it is if you crack it, known cracking softwares like Windows Loader won't work.
@@bedobilgisayar rip ok. I know windoes 7 supported it. But on my pc it just doesn't load or boot oof
@@patrickjn well, only 64-bit version supports it so if you're trying to install 32-bit then it won't work.
@@bedobilgisayar i used 64 bit
Why did you get so many CHKDSKs? Almost every OS earlier than Windows XP CHKDSK'd.
8:19 some old production machine from 90's that has drivers only for this system.
My dad's old custom-built MSI computer now has Windows XP, Vista, 7, and 11, multibooted!!
Windows 11 realease date: October 2021
The video date: September 2021
...
Beta exists and developer preview
@@Asik_jasterek technically, you are right.
If you read the bottom right corner, you'd know. "Windows 11 Pro Insider Preview"
I was ok until XP, but when he entered in Windows 2000 i was like: _hold up_
It's weird mainly for the fact that 11 and 2000 don't even support the same CPU architectures.
@@andreasjoannai6441 damn, that proves how Microsoft just stacks one Windows over another and creates "new specifications"
0:14 We first start with latest and worsest, Windows 11
I remember I dual-booted 7 operating systems or even more
Multibooted*
sept-booting
Omegabooting is when you multiboot 800 operating systems
Working on my project, I was able to install (in installation order):Windows XP, Windows Vista Ultimate, Windows7,windows 10, ubuntu 16.04
Older versions can able to use the fullscreen Right?
10:00 I do wonder if the issue is similar like too much ram but no. This is new
@Kernel NT thank you for your information
Actually Windows 2k can boot NT 3.xx without any problem but Windows XP can't boot under than NT4 SP6. The problem isn't too much ram nor Win 2k boot. Problem is logical partitions. NT 3.xx can't recognize newly logical partitions and crashs. 0x0000007b means hard-disk boot problems. The solution is use only primary partitions or use different HDD for Windows NT 3.xx with only primary partitions.
@Kernel NT But in my PC i can dual-boot with Win2k boot into WinNT3.xx. If u still not believe, i can upload video to my channel. Because I didnt use logical partition.
@Kernel NT Ok i will upload video
What partition style do you have used while creating partition. Is it GPT or MBR?
Also which software you use to create bootable USB. Is it Rufus or winsetupfromusb or some other?
Which mode do you boot from. Is it legacy or UEFI?
personally i use ventoy, but whne im not i use ventoy
Probably UEFI, and you can use Rufus. Windows 11 requires Secure boot and the TPM 2.0 chip. For that your BIOS mode must be UEFI.
@@Win32NTYou can bypass both by 2 registry keys
Edit: Also I'd doubt you can run NT 4 on UEFI
@@Win32NT + with 22H2 they lowered it to Tpm 1.2
Good job that you put Windows 8.1 and Windows 8.0
Awesome video!
9:44 Idk why that happened, maybe it was corrupted, maybe it was too big for NT, maybe partition limit?
Because Windows NT couldn't find the partition where it was installed.
With the right hardware, every single one, with official drivers & all exept for NT 4.0 I think, combo would be any any G45 motherboard with socket 775 and a TPM header, a decent Core 2 Quad to have a good experience in stock windows 11, a good graphics card compatible with XP and up (for previous windows versions just use the G45's GPU, drivers go all the way back to windows 98 probably works on 95 too with some patches, a TPM 2.0 module for the motherboard, one floppy reader, 1 or 2 IDE drives for windows versions prior to XP, one Sata drive for windows XP and up, a cd rom drive to install older OSes, and enough patience to source each part and install all the OSes.
i had a laptop that came with Windows vista that i got to dual boot windows 7, windows 8, and windows 11. (btw i want to someday have a computer that can dual boot Windows XP, Windows 2000, and Windows 7.)
tiny 10 is so cool for modern low ends thanks for making this lol
or ancient high ends
My desktop PC (real hardware) has Windows 7 SP1, Windows 7 build 6801, Windows 7 build 6730, Windows Server 2008(VIsta), Windows Vista Beta 2, Windows XP Media Center Edition 2004, Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005, Windows 95, Windows 3.1, MS-DOS 6.2 on one HDD
What about windows 10,8.1 and 11 and 8?
@@awsgamerguyI think they didn’t work
26 windows 14 linux 20 others with refind + grub file manager + clover without creating multipat partition. Installing os in vhd and booting directly feom grub file manager ...
now imagine if you could do the same thing with linux.
Seeing there's a tons of linux out there
@@jeremiahbullfrog9288 if you ask me. I am out
You can multi-boot Linux as much as you want as long as you fit within the requirements. Same thing with this video. You'll just need a LOT of storage space, that's all...
I was asking if when you download a iso, Will it show on boot manager and also put on the same product key?
Wow intro and music slaps😂
*_take a shot every time the chkdsk popup appears_*
Operating systems in this video:
Windows NT 4.0
Windows 2000
Windows XP
Windows Vista
Windows 7
Windows 8
Windows 8.1
Windows 10
Windows 11
Click here and comment which is the best and which is the worst.
8
3:18 32-bit works on 64-bit but the inverse of this is not true
THIS GUY MULTIBOOTED 9 VERSIONS OF WINDOWS FROM WINDOWS 1998 TO WINDOWS 11!!!
Great video
I miss the windows 8
for me i almost have the same boot options for me only windows 11 and nt 4 missing but 2000 worked after i installed windows xp but after i installed vista then it just bluescreens now was that the same issiue for you or not? if yes could you tell me how you got it start?
I have done 7 myself. 2000 pro, XP pro, Vista Pro, Win 7, Win 8.1, WIn 10, and Win 11 on a 10 year old Toshiba laptop.
can you tell me my windows 2000 is not working right now so we installed windows 2000 the next is windows xp and so if i add hard disk it will get blue screen of death cuz they are working for scsi and ide, and we can't dualboot windows 2000 and xp for ide
Sadly cant do 95 / 98 due to there ram limitations.
Nice going!
I've multibooted windows XP - windows 10 (except 8.0)
I expected it to fail on Windows 95, not on NT 3.1
NTDEV, your tiny11 22h3 installation requieres the terms and licence agreement
obviously nt 3.41 is angry cuz it cant access its own partition
NOSTALGIC
You can't dualboot NT 3.51 and XP/2000. Next time read the warnings during installation
How did he multiboot all of these oses
I only tried win 95 & 3.11 back then
3 Copyright Claims, 3 months.
2:31 on surface laptop 3 and pro 6 (only ones ive confirmed are like this) windows 8 wont run. though i was able to get windows server 2012 R2 with no explorer.exe running
Isnt it also CPU issues? Some Newer AMD or intel gen 11th or 12th gen doesnt recongnize by NTOSKRNL.exe ....
no, it is a problem with Windows NT itself. The 11th gen thing is a bug with windows 98
Cool!
i have 7, 8 beta, 8.1, 10 and 11 on the same drive
XP? How?
0x0000007B - Incompatible AHCI or bad BIOS settings
Which si the song?
Is*
In description
Link for the Vmdk file
That is so cursed lol
The NT family :)
Windows All Stars
My actual real hardware multiboot is from Windows 1.0 to 10 (except 2.11, NT 3.1 and 11). This is NOT a joke, real!
WHAT COMPUTER DO YOU HAVE BRO-
@@smd91xx VIA P4M800PRO-M(V1.0A) / Pentium 4 code511 2.8GHz / 2GB RAM / 80GB IDE HDD / 2x80GB SATA I HDD / IDE CD-ROM / USB 1.1-2.0 Ports / Nvidia Geforce FX5500 / PS/2 Mouse Keyboard / 1366x768 LCD monitor / Grub4Dos for multibooting
@@ages2001 "2GB RAM"
and you installed 98 on that?
🧢
@@smd91xx Yes i used patchmem for Windows 98 and ME. For Windows 95, i edited system.ini. Windows 98 and ME saw 2GB RAM but in Windows 95 only saw 900MB RAM.
@Kernel NT I installed DOS-Based OSes at second hard disk. Old NT OSes in first disk. And modern OSes in third disk. İf u ask me how u installed old OSes in SATA mode, luckily i found compatible drivers. So im not lying.
need process of installing
With windows 2000 you can get to windows 8
cool
Heh I multibooted 24 versions of windows
Really?
@@SOTP. yes ;)
@@Greenlight-np3uu nice.
can u do a tutorial bc I am trying to do this myself
atleast 2
Windows 11 may be the latest but it definitely ain't the greatest
Now, try this on a REAL machine [I have only tri-booted 10, 11 and 8.1]
madlad
5.
its five.
nah until u run out of storage
Imagine Windows 11 on 16 Megabyte of ram LOL
its physically impossible
enderman trued it and he coudnt even boot it until he tried 1gb
Multboot thanks your
I like windows xp
No Windows Me
26
😎👍
ISO of Windows 98 (working)
42 mins ago just right
I did something similar on my channel
now try booting them all with windows 10X lol
That might not possible
미국판 뻘짓연구소네 ㄹㅇㅋㅋ
0:13 plot twist: windows 11 sucks and its not great at all 😂
wdym windows 11 is the worst m$ software ever made.
Hello, what's your discord server invite link? The one in "community" tab is invalid...
Thanks!
Yay clipchamp