You can't go by just one year. The best team ever was the New York Yankees of the 1950s who in that decade made the World Series eight times and won six of them: ’50, ’51, ’52, ’53, ’56, ’58 🙂
“The Mets defeated the Orioles in five games to win the World Series and then swept the Braves in the National League Championship Series.” Really? I didn’t know they played the World Series before the NLCS.
The NY Yankees teams of the 1930s (five championships), 1940s (four titles) and 1950s (six titles) were dominant. Cincinnati and Detroit combined never did anything close to that. The NY Yankees teams of the 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s would have matched up quite well against Cincinnati and Detroit -- and everybody else. And would have beaten them, often.
@@mastermace7770, (1) the Reds weren't even the best team of the 1970s. Oakland was. (2) You cannot compare a team that won 2 crowns (yippee!) to a Dynasty that won 17 titles from 1936-1962.
@@henry-bo3np That 3 peat Oakland squad never won 108 games Amount of titles is irrelevant. Statistically, the '75 Reds were better than most of those Yankees teams, individually
@@pepesupreme6451, (1) "That 3 peat Oakland squad" won 3 Worlds Series. (2) The Reds were a great team for 2 years, and a very good team for 10 years. The Yankees were a great team/s from 1921-1964, but especially from 1936-1962. In other words, what the Reds did for 2 years the Yankees did for 36. Think on that.
How did the Oakland Athletics sweep the San Francisco Giants in 5 games in the 1989 Nay Bridge World Series? In fact, how does any baseball team sweep another in 5 games? *See best of 7 Series or *The first to 4
I'd have to put the 1994 Cleveland Indians on this list. Their offense was lethal for one thing. Of course Cleveland's bad luck continued when the season ended with a strike.🤬
The guy narrating this video knows nothing about baseball. When he got to the 1967 Cardinals he had mispronounced so many names I couldn’t stand to watch anymore. The worst part is he didn’t even know who some of the most famous players in baseball history and how to pronounce their names. Absolutely terrible video
Is this a computer voice doc???? No one calls Al Kaline ....Al Kaleeen muchless Tom Glavin .....Tom Glaveeen....really weird pronunciation! I don't like it!
Talked about the 75 reds but doesn’t bring up Bench? As a reds fan Bench is the legend of the team with Pete. Hard to leave out the best catcher ever. Yes he is the best catcher ever.
he was not the same after the surgery but not many baseball players can get their chest cut in half and come back and still play baseball at a super high level like Bench did!
really? It was a team of platoon players with above average pitching. It worked in 90's but I doubt it would have had much success against most of the other teams mentioned in the All Time Greats.
The AI was terrible with names. Most the New York teams listed shouldn't be on the list. 86 Mets were not even the best team of the decade. They barely got past Houston the playoffs, had it gone to a seventh game it was over before it started with Mike Scott on the mound. I would pretty much put any of the 60's world champions as well as the world series losers ahead of most of the teams on this list.
Ruth and Gehrig would bomb way overrated Mariano ' one inning ' Rivera to smithereens . 1927 Yankees would crush Clemens and Jeter and the 1998 Yanks .
The name pronunciation is awful. Wow! Are you a Mets fan? 1986 Mets better than the 27’ Yankees?Obviously not enough research was done. The Reds were great as hitters but didn’t have top pitchers.
I'm not sure this guy has ever looked into baseball history...he can't even pronounce the players names correctly....the 1908 Cubs won 116 and the WS...84 Tigers? Terrible list.
Who is this guy narriating this video ? he obviously knows nothing about baseball as he miss pronounced several players name.
AI script reading maybe
You can't go by just one year. The best team ever was the New York Yankees of the 1950s who in that decade made the World Series eight times and won six of them: ’50, ’51, ’52, ’53, ’56, ’58 🙂
Absolutely 💯 it’s such a good run it doesn’t even look real when you type it out it’s video game numbers
Only because the 70's Oakland A's got broken up by the coming of free agency.
@@biffmarcum5014
Oakland barely squeezed by the '72 Reds and would have lost to the '75 Reds either way
@@pepesupreme6451 keep telling yourself that.
@@biffmarcum5014
That 1990 world series was fun wasn't it
Have fun in Sacramento buddy
The battling title? Al Ka-leen? Tom Gla-veen?
That's what happens when the weatherman reads the sports.
I am not an A's fan but the A's of the early 70's were awesome.
i agree though I was rooting for the Tigers, Orioles, the Reds or the Mets when they played! LOL
The 1984 Tigers would like a word, as would the 1930 Philadelphia Athletics, the 1906 Cubs and the 2016 Cubs
The Tigers were no joke....
They opened the season with a 35-5 record.
@@OldMovieFan1973 yeah and then .500 the rest of the season LOL
“The Mets defeated the Orioles in five games to win the World Series and then swept the Braves in the National League Championship Series.” Really? I didn’t know they played the World Series before the NLCS.
Al Kaleen 😂
He knows nothing about baseball 💀
Reds. The big red machine.
The Big Red Machune of 1975-76 is unmatched. And where is the 1984 Tiger's team that was 35-5, won 104 games and was 7-1 in the post season.
The NY Yankees teams of the 1930s (five championships), 1940s (four titles) and 1950s (six titles) were dominant. Cincinnati and Detroit combined never did anything close to that. The NY Yankees teams of the 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s would have matched up quite well against Cincinnati and Detroit -- and everybody else. And would have beaten them, often.
@@henry-bo3npno, the Yankees of the 30s, 40s, and 50s would suck against the 75-76 Reds.
@@mastermace7770, (1) the Reds weren't even the best team of the 1970s. Oakland was. (2) You cannot compare a team that won 2 crowns (yippee!) to a Dynasty that won 17 titles from 1936-1962.
@@henry-bo3np
That 3 peat Oakland squad never won 108 games
Amount of titles is irrelevant. Statistically, the '75 Reds were better than most of those Yankees teams, individually
@@pepesupreme6451, (1) "That 3 peat Oakland squad" won 3 Worlds Series. (2) The Reds were a great team for 2 years, and a very good team for 10 years. The Yankees were a great team/s from 1921-1964, but especially from 1936-1962. In other words, what the Reds did for 2 years the Yankees did for 36. Think on that.
How did the Oakland Athletics sweep the San Francisco Giants in 5 games in the 1989 Nay Bridge World Series? In fact, how does any baseball team sweep another in 5 games? *See best of 7 Series or *The first to 4
Dodgers swept the “A’s” in 88 in five.
Well if you count the gentlemans sweep. But sure you're right a clean sweep is 4.
He probably meant "gentleman's sweep"
Y’all used the wrong Ken Griffey in your entry about the ‘76 Reds
I'd have to put the 1994 Cleveland Indians on this list. Their offense was lethal for one thing. Of course Cleveland's bad luck continued when the season ended with a strike.🤬
You mean the 95 Indians. In 94, the Expos were the best team in baseball.
The guy narrating this video knows nothing about baseball. When he got to the 1967 Cardinals he had mispronounced so many names I couldn’t stand to watch anymore. The worst part is he didn’t even know who some of the most famous players in baseball history and how to pronounce their names. Absolutely terrible video
Your picture of Cincinnati Reds 1976 Ken Griffey was actually a picture of his son Ken Griffey Jr.
Is this a computer voice doc???? No one calls Al Kaline ....Al Kaleeen muchless Tom Glavin .....Tom Glaveeen....really weird pronunciation! I don't like it!
This is a terrible list
Shut up bot
This is why they need to show the dislike count. Such a horrible edit
Talked about the 75 reds but doesn’t bring up Bench? As a reds fan Bench is the legend of the team with Pete. Hard to leave out the best catcher ever. Yes he is the best catcher ever.
he was not the same after the surgery but not many baseball players can get their chest cut in half and come back and still play baseball at a super high level like Bench did!
1942 St. Louis Cardinals were the best Cardinalteam
The fact that the 98 Yankees is not number 1 makes this list false
really? It was a team of platoon players with above average pitching. It worked in 90's but I doubt it would have had much success against most of the other teams mentioned in the All Time Greats.
@@biffmarcum5014 your the only one with that opinion 😂
The AI was terrible with names. Most the New York teams listed shouldn't be on the list. 86 Mets were not even the best team of the decade. They barely got past Houston the playoffs, had it gone to a seventh game it was over before it started with Mike Scott on the mound. I would pretty much put any of the 60's world champions as well as the world series losers ahead of most of the teams on this list.
Junior wasn't on the 76 Reds
1986 mets. Everyone else is an afterthought.
I hate the Yankees but I know for a fact that The 1998 Yankees were the best team ever.
hmm, someone does not know the difference between fact and interpretation of fact. Though no doubt many will agree with the interpretation.
Having the 89 A's on here is enough for me to move onto the next video, plus u mentioned dave parker instead of Jose canseco
These videos that mispronounce names so bad and get information wrong. It isn't Al Kay-leen, it's Al Kay-line. Have to block this site.
57 braves great team
what about the 1932 yankees. i think they're better than 1998 yankees honsetly
Where the hell are the Philadelphia Athletics from 1929-31? They beat those same Murderers Row Yankees each of those years.
The Yanks were not in the World Series in 29, 30, or 31.
@@grayadam Yes, I know. Because the Athletics stomped them out of the pennant race in 29, 30, and 31.
They were great for their time, but other teams were better than them. The Babe Ruth Yankees are overrated.
The way some of these names are pronounced makes my ears hurt.
The 92 and 93 blue jays are paramount to the 89 A’es and 91 braves - jays beat and ended both of them!
What a crock.
Tom glavean 😂💀
I grew up in Baltimore and I hate the Yankees. With that said, the ‘98 Yankees or the ‘27 squad should be first. I mean cmon.
This is made by AI
got Ken Griffey mixed up with his son.
Ruth and Gehrig would bomb way overrated Mariano ' one inning ' Rivera to smithereens .
1927 Yankees would crush Clemens and Jeter and the 1998 Yanks .
98 Yankees
The 86 Mets better than the 98 Yankees?
That Al Kaleen was great...pssh i cant stand AI generated voices
The name pronunciation is awful. Wow! Are you a Mets fan? 1986 Mets better than the 27’ Yankees?Obviously not enough research was done. The Reds were great as hitters but didn’t have top pitchers.
Joe Monroe the best ever
I'm not sure this guy has ever looked into baseball history...he can't even pronounce the players names correctly....the 1908 Cubs won 116 and the WS...84 Tigers? Terrible list.
2005 White Sox
Best team?
#1- 1927 and 1961 Yanks!
Team of the decade-1950's Yanks.
1927 yankees are overrated. No 1 belongs too the reds
Putting a roid era team is the same as l don't know the game! 98 Yankees arnt in top 10!!!
Kid kaleen
Yankees
Go to 2004 and the Red Sox Nation miracle.
horrible list...No A's from 30"s No Dodgers from 50"s. 69 Mets is no way a top team! Neither are the 68 Tigers. Just terrible.
27 NYY, 01 SEA
Dude, u need to re-read your script, 5 game sweep for example lol
Uh the '69 Mets had to beat the Braves in the NL Championship before they played the Orioles in the World Series. Very sloppy mistake.
So so many name mispronunciations