Thank u @Martin and I highly appreciate your feedback, I'll definitely consider your input for my future videos. I'll lower down the music audio track layer next time around.
i guess im asking the wrong place but does someone know of a way to get back into an instagram account? I was dumb lost the login password. I would appreciate any assistance you can offer me.
Thank you so muchh, you explained it very clear and simple that makes me understand it well. Reading in books just makes my nose bleed because of expanded vocabularies require for it to read but you just make it all simple in just short watching time.
Web 2.0 started with no meaning & debatable, until it was by generally accepted by majority of the community by defining it as a feature where user can change the content, in contrast of an static website that's purely displays info. It was eventually defined according to differences in philosophy and implementations, and this concepts reaches formally even on textbooks and found it's way to curriculum of government institutes. Even the meaning of Web 3.0 is literaly evolving even at the moment I write this comment. The term web 1.0 did not even exist at start, only began when internet technology was advancing. So yeah basically these are just terms to differentiate the stages while the internet advances, and normally starts with one influential person/company/group in the field until it receives a majority general acceptance by all users. So by the current definition, if websites with comment boxes happened to exist in the period of web 1.0 they will fall in the category of web 2.0
@@codemutation I know all of that, although I suspect that Web 2.0 was a bit more determined than you imply; The broadband rollout, the adoption of CSS, the introduction of Gmail and the Chrome browser, and the opening up of Facebook to non-students, etc. seemed to all happen in a steady, occasionally simultaneously manner. There were a lot of articles about Web 2.0 hyping it at the time, not just in academia, but in magazines and newspapers as well. But that’s a different topic. I’m only trying to make a small correction about static websites before Web 2.0 being “one way only” and “passive.” But you are certainly correct that the _vast_ majority of these sites were completely static, which is something that I actually miss a little bit. I’ve been on the Internet and the World Wide Web since about 1996 or 1997. The function of an HTML guestbook was a script to write a “signature” on an otherwise static websites (we’re talking about text-on-background HTML Index pages, with maybe a few links, frames, and so on). But some people used guestbook scripts to leave (short) messages which could be read, and comment boxes which would send an email to the webmaster.
@@dethkon Interesting detailed points but anyway at the end of the day web 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 are just naming conventions and the current definitions that I expounded in this video is to help students studying this topic, and everything was based on the definition by Tim Berners-Lee being the directory of World Wide Web Consortium and the Inventor of the World Wide Web (1989) In which in simple terms he claims the following: Web 1.0 "read-only web" web 2.0 "read-write" web 3.0 "read-write-execute"
jerome what type of web is amazon.co.uk, wolfram alpha, inquirer.net, youtube, instagram, facebook, siri's apple voice recognition, trio healthcare group, the new york times, enncylopedia britannica?
Some of the websites that you mentioned started as pure Web 2.0 which is "read-write" according to Tim Berners-Lee's definition (Inventor of World Wide Web) but apparently facebook, amazon youtube and some other platforms are now implementing Machine Learning integrated into their systems, A.I and Machine Learning Leads and implies the "read-write-execute" by Tim Berners-Lee definition. Please note that Web 1.0, Web 2.0, and Web 3.0 are abstract terms and should not be taken so seriously, the read-write-execute is also an abstract term While Web 1.0 is so clear in definition as being read-only, the emergence of A.I. and Machine Learning starts to blur the definition of Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 as technologies continue to evolve these terms and its definition may change over time. Also, it is important to note that a website is not necessarily obsolete if it doesn't include a feature that allows users participation in generating content or being a Web 1.0 or read-only website. There are many landing pages today that the only purpose is for the user to click the call to action button.
Could you re upload without the music? Or at least turn it down.. it really ruins the experience when the music constantly randomly just starts blasting :/
@@jemjem8902 Good thoughts. But decentralization is a different concept. It's already happening. steemit.com for example is a blockchain-based decentralized social-media network, I've been active on that platform for quite sometime steemit.com/@jerome-morales . Web 3.0 is more on symantics of the web and making the use of it more personalized, both centralized and decentralized systems can or may implement web 3.0.
@@codemutation Oh okay thanks. Nalilito kasi ako, merong web3 na sinasabi ang ethereum network, since I'm working with web3, and there's also this web3.0. Thanks for this!
Hi Jerome, good stuff, but the music is louder than your voice. I would reduce it by 50%.
Thank u @Martin and I highly appreciate your feedback, I'll definitely consider your input for my future videos. I'll lower down the music audio track layer next time around.
Hi Martin that was straightforward recommendation which people avoid giving to anyone these days, appreciate that
i guess im asking the wrong place but does someone know of a way to get back into an instagram account?
I was dumb lost the login password. I would appreciate any assistance you can offer me.
@Corbin Nickolas instablaster =)
@@corbinnickolas5802 Forgot password >> then create a new password, i think that will do it
I had hard time learning by myself but I easily learned it by your simple explanation
Thank you so muchh, you explained it very clear and simple that makes me understand it well. Reading in books just makes my nose bleed because of expanded vocabularies require for it to read but you just make it all simple in just short watching time.
In all videos i watch about web1.0 2.0 3.0..this video is understandable..... Thankssssa
Thanks for the feedback @Vergel Miranda.
jerome you got sick music homie
thankyou for this video. It is the most clear explanation about web 3.0 .
You're welcome. Glad u find it helpful
Thank you so much. I have a test tomorrow and it will contain this. You really helped me understand. Thanks again
I am glad that you find it helpful
lol this music reminds me of the GTA respect earned theme
reminds me of Sand Andreas lol
What is the song name?
Yes, I have learned something. Thanks for the clear explanation.
Glad it was helpful!
Music with study, what's a wonderful to me
thankyou sir this one helped me on answering my modules hehe
Thank you Jerome, very good presentation. I learned what I needed to know in a well explained way.
You're welcome. GLad to know that u find it useful.
Excellente! Thank you very much. Great info and very clear explenation.
Glad you enjoyed it!
Comment boxes and “guest books” were absolutely available in Web 1.0, not to mention vBBS systems.
Web 2.0 started with no meaning & debatable, until it was by generally accepted by majority of the community by defining it as a feature where user can change the content, in contrast of an static website that's purely displays info. It was eventually defined according to differences in philosophy and implementations, and this concepts reaches formally even on textbooks and found it's way to curriculum of government institutes. Even the meaning of Web 3.0 is literaly evolving even at the moment I write this comment. The term web 1.0 did not even exist at start, only began when internet technology was advancing. So yeah basically these are just terms to differentiate the stages while the internet advances, and normally starts with one influential person/company/group in the field until it receives a majority general acceptance by all users. So by the current definition, if websites with comment boxes happened to exist in the period of web 1.0 they will fall in the category of web 2.0
@@codemutation I know all of that, although I suspect that Web 2.0 was a bit more determined than you imply; The broadband rollout, the adoption of CSS, the introduction of Gmail and the Chrome browser, and the opening up of Facebook to non-students, etc. seemed to all happen in a steady, occasionally simultaneously manner.
There were a lot of articles about Web 2.0 hyping it at the time, not just in academia, but in magazines and newspapers as well. But that’s a different topic.
I’m only trying to make a small correction about static websites before Web 2.0 being “one way only” and “passive.” But you are certainly correct that the _vast_ majority of these sites were completely static, which is something that I actually miss a little bit.
I’ve been on the Internet and the World Wide Web since about 1996 or 1997. The function of an HTML guestbook was a script to write a “signature” on an otherwise static websites (we’re talking about text-on-background HTML Index pages, with maybe a few links, frames, and so on).
But some people used guestbook scripts to leave (short) messages which could be read, and comment boxes which would send an email to the webmaster.
@@dethkon Interesting detailed points but anyway at the end of the day web 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 are just naming conventions and the current definitions that I expounded in this video is to help students studying this topic, and everything was based on the definition by Tim Berners-Lee being the directory of World Wide Web Consortium and the Inventor of the World Wide Web (1989) In which in simple terms he claims the following:
Web 1.0 "read-only web"
web 2.0 "read-write"
web 3.0 "read-write-execute"
@@codemutation I think you do a good job, for what it’s worth.
You create good content with fluently English and simple to understand 💥💥💥
jerome what type of web is amazon.co.uk, wolfram alpha, inquirer.net, youtube, instagram, facebook, siri's apple voice recognition, trio healthcare group, the new york times, enncylopedia britannica?
Some of the websites that you mentioned started as pure Web 2.0 which is "read-write" according to Tim Berners-Lee's definition (Inventor of World Wide Web) but apparently facebook, amazon youtube and some other platforms are now implementing Machine Learning integrated into their systems, A.I and Machine Learning Leads and implies the "read-write-execute" by Tim Berners-Lee definition. Please note that Web 1.0, Web 2.0, and Web 3.0 are abstract terms and should not be taken so seriously, the read-write-execute is also an abstract term While Web 1.0 is so clear in definition as being read-only, the emergence of A.I. and Machine Learning starts to blur the definition of Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 as technologies continue to evolve these terms and its definition may change over time. Also, it is important to note that a website is not necessarily obsolete if it doesn't include a feature that allows users participation in generating content or being a Web 1.0 or read-only website. There are many landing pages today that the only purpose is for the user to click the call to action button.
HAHAHA magaling kang bata
@@codemutation Thankyou for your time!! it really helps
thanks for sharing your knowledge
Thaaank you so much! This is brief and so helpful! 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
Thank you Sir. 2020 from Philippines Online Class purposes.
Thanks. Good luck with your online class.
Thank you so much! This is very helpful.
YOu're welcome.
Thank you sir now I can answer my activity about this topic
You're welcome. Im glad you find it helpful
Very well explained! Thanks for the info!
Well explained, thank you very much !!!
Myspace was before 2005 in web 1.0 era. So how it is possible for web 1.0 as you said it was static.
were Java Applet considered part of Web1.0 or Web 2.0?
because i have been playing Chess online with other players back in 1999.
Thank you sir.. I have now the answer for my module HAHA
Good for you. Keep learning.
Cool Video, it was usefull for my studies, thanks👍
You're welcome!
Yo this beat is slappin holy shit
Great video! This is what I was looking for my class. You remind me of my techy son who works for Google :) Keep going!
Thank you for saying that. Have a good one.
best video on the subject I could find, thanks!
Thanks for the feedback. Im glad u find it helpful.
Everyone complaining about the music, while there's me wanting to know what the music name is
Good 👍
Really helpful. Thanks.
You're welcome
good video , but i prefer if background music is lower
Who’s here after the WSB uprising?
What’s that?
@@dethkon pppp
pppp
p
pp
Thank you, what a clear explanation 💜
Very informative
Thank you
What is the future of web 2.0?
Web 3.0 it has begun already
thanks sir
Thanks you so much sir.. helped my topuc for tommorow
I'm glad u find it helpful. Good luck in your study
good explanation. tq
Great explanation and easy to understand but the music is louder than your voice.
Thanks for your valuable feedback. I'll consider reducing background music when I create another content of this category.
@@codemutation Thanks for replying back. I look forward to see your content again.
Where did you get all the Information from?
I like the explanation. It is very clear. May nagtilaok lang talaga na manok. sayang naman Sir. :D
What are the similarities of web 1.0 2.0 3.0 can you give me a three?
Salamat po
Thanks for the very informative video sir
you're welcome. Im happy that u find it helpful
Good video and stuff, but please remove the background music, it makes it impossible to hear what you are saying half the time
Ano po pagkakaparehas nilang tatlo? Thank you po
Great video, but the BGM is too loud bro.
Static
Dynamic
Automation
This is beautiful
Thank you sir💜
Always welcome
What's going on with the music?? It keeps getting louder. Very annoying
Thank you sir.
You're welcome
What are their similarities ?
Thanks you sir
GREAT CONTENT!!!
It was a really good video. But please turn down the music🎵. Its hard to concentrate on what u say. Thanks 👍
Thanks for the appreciation and your valuable feedback. I'll definitely consider it.
I'm here because of Cisco.
Wassap media fam
Ser pogi mo ser😊😊-maylass
Good explanation but the annoying music takes away from it.
Music is louder than voice 😢
Web 3.0 is beyond your imagination
I agree.
HI Jerome this is very good huge understandable
Thanks
there is no need for the music at all. it just distracts from the content and is actually pretty annoying.
content info is good though
I seriously highly appreciate this type of honest feedback. Thanks Mat, I'll definitely consider it.
The music is too loud and distracting
Don't put a fcking background music, please it is distracting
Could you re upload without the music? Or at least turn it down.. it really ruins the experience when the music constantly randomly just starts blasting :/
Next time better no music background
Bakit ayaw ho
lose the music, please
THanks for the feedback. I'll definitely consider that in my next video.
So youtube is web 3.0
No it's web2.0
RUclips, facebook, google now applying artificial intelligence on their systems so it's becoming closer to web 3.0
@@codemutation Sir ang alam ko po sa web3 is ung decentralization of applications and websites like the use of Ethereum?
@@jemjem8902 Good thoughts. But decentralization is a different concept. It's already happening. steemit.com for example is a blockchain-based decentralized social-media network, I've been active on that platform for quite sometime steemit.com/@jerome-morales . Web 3.0 is more on symantics of the web and making the use of it more personalized, both centralized and decentralized systems can or may implement web 3.0.
@@codemutation Oh okay thanks. Nalilito kasi ako, merong web3 na sinasabi ang ethereum network, since I'm working with web3, and there's also this web3.0. Thanks for this!
I'm sorry but the music in the background is so annoying and makes it so hard to understand what you're trying to say
Does amazon.co.uk web 3.0?
Still 2.0 but they already have implemented machine learning in their systems to personalized user's needs.
Your view of web3.0 is flawed man... What you call web3.0 is also web2.0.
tang*na dito ko lang naintindihan differences ng 2.0 at 3.0 dun sa ibang vid daming paligoy ligoy
Thank you