Core 2 Duo E7500 and GTS450 in 2021 how does it game.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 июл 2024
- We try our luck with the old E7500 Core 2 Duo and an old NVIDIA GTS 450.
We run our benchmarks and try the PC out in a small handful of games.
Stick around as we stumble our way through with this PC.
Support us on Patreon.
/ offbit
Chapters
========
0:00 Intro
0:25 OFFbit Intro
0:51 Hardware Introduction
3:43 Benchmarks
5:43 Gameplay Diablo III
6:50 Gameplay World Of Tanks Blitz
7:34 Gameplay Overwatch
8:39 Gameplay Valorant
9:34 Gameplay Genshin Impact
10:48 Gameplay Heroes of the Storm
11:51 Conclusion 
Наука
Nice video
❤️❤️
I am using this card for 10 years. This year I overclocked it 100+ on core clock and 100+ on memory that gave me 5 - 10 fps boost, in some games even more. Even without the overclock i was able to get an average 55 - 60 fps on Overwatch with 1080p medium ( with render scale 80%).
My build:
CPU: i3 - 9100f 4c/4t
GPU: gts 450 1gb gddr5
RAM: 16gb 2666hz hyperx
Mobo: gigabyte b365m - h
In your build the card is only using about 40% of its power ( in Overwatch specifically ). The CPU and RAM are clearly limiting the card.
Edit: I forgot to tell you that in Genshin Impact I am getting rock solid 60 fps with 1080p low - mid settings.
Nice. yep the core 2 duo is definitely holding the card back. The 9100f would defiantly be able to help the card reach it's max potential.
Genshin Impact really needs more than 2 threads, its just not enough. Even with four It probably still needs better performance from the cores.
Thanks for watching.
Always good to here older cards still getting used.
@@OFFbitTech Yeah my card went through a ton of gaming and regular usage. This year i was thinking of changing it with 1650 super, but with the out of stock situation i am stuck with it. Maybe in a couple of months i will be able to buy new card.
To be honest i don't want to change my gts 450 because i am emotionally connected to it, but unfortunately the card is showing its age.
@@djnyxa it's a tough break with the video card market at the moment.
The 1650 will give you so much more in performance and features.
I think once you change over you won't look back.
Though I still have a few cards I have very fond memories of.
I am sure this will be the case for you by the sounds of it.
At least you should be able to retire the 450 as a working card.
@@OFFbitTech When i change the gts 450 i am definitely going to frame it on the wall.
Ur GTS 450 is a legend bro.. Salute 😎
tnx
What is the best for gts 540. Core 2 duo or core 2 quad?
How many fps i got on valorant?
Spec : Core 2 duo e8400 + ram 4gb ddr2
+ zotac gt 730 ddr3
You should be able to get about 45fps + on average.
Have a look at this previous video we have done with a similar setup. We did play valorant during this video so really should give you a good idea what to expect. The video card we used in the video was the GT430 so the 730 will do a bit better.
ruclips.net/video/AL98F76FVng/видео.html
We hope that helps.
Thanks for watching.
Is this gpu good for games up to the year of 2013? I want to play Borderlands 2 and Far Cry 3. My gpu is now GT 620 1gb that struggles playing games from 2005. My PSU is Seasonic S12II 450w (around 3 years old but I didn't use it for almost 2 years). GTS 450 is around $30 here, not a bad deal.
The CPU should be able to play 2013 games, but if you could go up to the e8400 it would do better with games Like borderlands 2.
A better GPU would probably help out a great deal
The 450 does look like it is a lot better for gaming as shown on UserBenchmark (link below),
that might be a good start. I am not sure if Farcy 3 would benefit from a QuadCore CPU or not, but you might want to look into a core 2 quad CPU.
gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GeForce-GTS-450-vs-Nvidia-GeForce-GT-620/m7762vsm8899
@@OFFbitTech I oced my CPU to 3.6ghz (max it could handle on stock voltage is 3.75ghz, higher than that it couldn't boot). I stay on 3.6ghz because it is the sweet spot. I get stable fps around 40-60fps on Fallout 3 GoTY on 720p medium setting. I don't want to upgrade the cpu because the system is too old I think. I may go straight with i3 10100f or Ryzen 5 5600g in the future as the price of AMD chip is getting back to normal. I want to play PS3/X360 gen games because I skip them entirely. I only played PES with friends back then. Thanks for your suggestion!
I have that exact same hd 6950 from gigabyte you have in the intro. Sux it has only 1gb of vram.
Nice spotting.
Unfortunately the one we have is dead.
One day we will add another one to our collection hopefully.
Thanks for watching.
hey what fps would you think i would have in valorant or cs go if my setup is
e8600
gtx 560
4gb ddr3 1333mhz ram
why ask it just try it
You tested wot Blitz? Good, not all RUclipsrs do that.
Geht auch der Intel E7500 als Prozessor?
So basically the cpu is the one that limits the fps in the tested games, not the graphics card? That right?
It really can be one or the other.
Depending which device hits it's limit first.
i have core 2 duo e6750 graphics card is intel express chipset q45/q43 and 4gb ram 2.66ghz 32 bit windows 7 can i run it
What game are you wanting to run?
What could be the best GPU for this processor?
You really don't want to go to overboard.
The dual core core2 really can bottle neck newer GPUs.
I would probably go as far as a gtx 650.
Unless you upgrade to a quad core CPU.
Thanks for watching.
is that normal ? just like what happened to valorant in your video...my cpu usage go high than gpu usage in CSGO..so fps drops much
If the CPU is maxed out it will be bottle necking the rest of the system. So, GPU usage may actually still have more head room for more work but cant quite utilize it due to the CPU being too busy.
So you could potentially get more FPS if the CPU utilization was not maxed out.
If both GPU and CPU where maxed out then I think you could say,
There will not be to many extra FPS you can get out of the current hardware set up.
Hope that helps.
Thanks again for watching.
@@OFFbitTech when i play CSGO cpu isage goes like 90% and gpu usage like 50-60%
@@agheelahmed
I'm not 100% of the answer but I am thinking maybe, if the graphics settings you are running is just not enough work for the GPU to do. Leaving extra head room (showing 50 - 60% leaving 40 - 50% unused).
But turning up the graphics settings will probably send the CPU up closer or to 100% usage and if those odd 100% CPU spikes you may already get from time to time will become more frequent and happen much longer.
They are my thoughts at moment of what maybe happening here.
They may not be correct. Disclaimer. : )
Waiting for the barrage of comments from others to correct me. : )
@@OFFbitTech hmm thx anyway
Whats the cheapest cpu for this gpu so it wont bottleneck?
I don't know if i have definitive answer, but I do fee that the GTS 450 would do better with a core 2 quad system at least or even an i3.
Bottlenecks are hard to define with hardware and applications, since Each game is programed differently some use more GPU than other games the other more CPU. Also on top of that there are other factors where AMD CPU performs tasks better than Intel's and vice versa and Finally even updates play a vital role as well.
But yes there will be a bottleneck but that point does move around a lot for the above reasons.
What do you thing the FPS will be with 2GB ram GeForce 9500 GT and this cpu
not great most likely It will depend on what game you are playing but a lot of newer titles will refuse to run because of not enough support from the hardware APIs on the card.
Sticking to games like counter strike source and more 2d based games may be you better bet.
There is still a lot of games you should be able to play with this card, but they will be more older titles and be prepared to use low graphics settings.
Fps with radeon hd 7540?
Specs:
Mobo: AM3
CPU: Athlon II x2 245
GPU:
RAM: (2x4gb) 8gb 1333mhz ddr3
Unfortunately the Radeon hd 7540 is about 70% slower than the GTS 450. we would expect a lot more slower results for 3d games of course .
If we do end up having a Radeon hd 7540 we will give it a test run with a similar system. But until then we can only speculate it's slower performance.
Sorry we could not help with any more information.
Thanks for watching .
@@OFFbitTech thats ok, i was just curious because of how others talk about the two GPUs. Great video btw
@@OFFbitTech i found one for 20$ but i dont see a 6pin port?
@@catconsumer If it does not have a 6pin molex it will consume less then 70w of power. It will probably also will not perform as good as one that does have a 6pin connector for power. But should be still a lot better than the hd 7540.
@@OFFbitTech its probably good bcus i dont have 6 pin connectors lol
What are the fps without recording?
You should see same fps.
We do all our recording on a separate computer with a capture card so there is no performance reduction whilst recording.
So what you see in this video should reflect what you should get on similar systems.
We hope that helps,
thanks for watching.
What you recording Bro?
For our game play video we record with an Avermedia Capture Card.
All the other camera work is done a Cannon DSLR Camera.
We hope that helps.
Thanks for watching.
Can I use GTX 550Ti On Intel Duo Core E7500?
Yes that should be a good match up for the system.
i have same specs but gt 610 and 4gb ddr3....im trying to record but its not working at all i trired all the softwares and all fastest encorder...how bad am i ? LOL..im planing to buy q6600 maybe it may help..
Don't feel bad. Nothing wrong In trying to record no matter what system you are running.
When you get better hardware you will know so much more.
It's a hard thing working with older hardware but it has for me helped me optimise any pc system to get the max out of them. I have a learnt so much more about pc hardware and the windows operating system.
The q6600 should help out. But I'm not sure if it will get you across the line. Recording at lower resolutions may be the key. Which I'm sure you have already looked at.
You could also look into getting an external recorder if you are recording games or stuff off your pc.
Here at the offbit we use another pc with a capture card. It takes the load of the pc we are looking at as well as a clean recording.
We wish you the best of luck.
Making videos can be very fun but there is the cost of being able to capture the content. Stay positive and keep up the good work.
Thanks for watching. We love having your support on this channel.
@@OFFbitTech thx....i dont have capture card..and i have a lap which i3 2nd gen(just a normal one). and i tried ndi(obs)...its same as this pc
@@agheelahmed We have not played with the NDI plug in and obs studio.
Looks really interesting.
Shame you cant get that to work with out problems.
Having our capture card is still not the easy option at times. Some days and some PCs it just does not want to work with capturing.
We can spend hours sometimes trying to get a video card to work on it and other cards.. most video cards are no problems.
The card we use is Avermedia Live Gamer HD Lite - GL510E.
It's not an amazing capture card but we got it cheap and it has done the job.
Oneday we might give obs ndi plugin a try.
Looks good.
We hope you sought something out.
Would be good if you manage to get obs ndi to work.
@@OFFbitTech still its frames drop in NDI..:(...I will try something SSSOOONNN.LOL
@@agheelahmed is that card NVENC supported? So it won't push out hella CPU too much
Will this be enough for a 275 w psu?
The GTS450 will most likely need a 400 to 450w power supply at minimum. In the end it really does comes down to how much current the PSU can produce on the 12v rails but I would say a 400 to 450 watt power supply should cover it. A 275w PSU most likely will not be able to unfortunately.
We hope that helps,
Thank you for watching.
Is the gts 450 power hungry?
The card is does not consume a lot of power compared to some of the higher end cards that are available.
The GTS450 according to Wikipedia has a TDP(thermal design power) of 106 watts. Most motherboard will provide up to 75 watts from their PCI Express slot. So this card will always have an extra power cable help supply enough power to get the 106 watts.
In short, the card really does not use a lot of power, but it does use more than a what the motherboard can supply. I would expect that a system using a GTS450 would need to be using a 400 - 450 watt power supply at minimum.
We hope that helps with your question.
Thanks for watching.
How much better would it be with a gtx 460
The GTX 460 would probably seem better in some games but not others. The CPU will most likely be a bottleneck in this configuration with a GTX 460.
But it will defiantly depend on the game and how much of the cpu is utilized vs the gpu.
With out giving a true real life run it's hard to say but we would expect it to do better then the GTS 450 but a better CPU will make the GTX 460 stand out even more.
why are you drop cpu
capture card?
The capture card we use for our videos is the Avermedia Live Gamer HD Lite.
It's a cheap PCIe capture card we use in a different PC to record our Videos when we are getting in game or desktop recording from our subject pc.
The card is bit tricky to get working at times in windows 10 but with the drivers installed from Avermedia website we generally have little issues.
We hope that helps
Thanks for watching.
GTS 450 or GTX 560???
I would prefer the GTX 560.
The 560 is a lot faster in performance.
Both cards are Fermi based cards, but the 500 series has a design refresh.
The draw backs of the GTX 560 is that it can chew up to 150watts of Power apposed the GTS 450 with a TDP of 106W.
But hands down GTX 560 every day of the week in my opinion.
Thanks for watching.
I'm wondering if cs 1.6 could run on this at 100 fps above 🤔
We think it should be very possible.
Gts 450 is GTX 550
We do believe that the GTX 550 ti and the gt 545 did replace the GTS 450. Though the GT 545 is much slower
However GTX 550 Ti does have a 10% to 15% improvement in 3d performance and 550 Ti does have the gpu code of GF116 compared to the gts 450 with the code of GF106.
So, they are probably very similar with performance and efficiency upgrades applied to the GTX 550 TI.
Thanks for watching.
What Fps csgo?
1280x720 is the best settings with low details.
We ended up with about a 50fps on average.
The game is quiet playable and smooth at these settings.
At 1920x1080 the game had some frame timing issues. thought it ran ok it did not feel great for competitive game play. Also it did suffer from some low frame rates drops at this resolution.
We tested this with dust 2 map.
So if you stick to 1280 x 720 you should get a good gaming experience.
Hope that helps, thanks for watching.
@@OFFbitTech
thank you very much, could you bring a video playing with the minimum resolution? if it is not a hassle, I never called graphics
@@Txr07 We will see what we can do.
Uhh i can get 80+fps on VALORANT with this gpu
probably have a better cpu
@@zadeypops7172 Yeah, nowadays i am getting 120+ because Riot fixed some major problems
in 2021 means games from 2021 and maybe 2020 and 2019
We view it as.
If the game is still receiving updates and DLC then it is a current and relevant game for 2021.
Also if it has a relatively big online player base we will still add it in as a relevant title.
Hence why we say relevant titles for 2021 not games released in 2021.
Thank you for your opinion and thank you for watching.
@@OFFbitTech Then include big recent AAA titles like Valhala, RDR2 and 'Cyberbug'. Otherwise you may induce the wrong idea that this CPU is good enough for 2021.