A Selection of Sealed Pattern Hi-Power Holsters
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 окт 2024
- A look at some Canadian designed British sealed pattern holsters.
Patreon - / riflemanmoore
PayPal - www.paypal.com...
Facebook - / riflemanmoore
Instagram - / riflemanmoore
Twitter - / rifleman_moore
A man talking about variants Webbing components, first thing in the morning?
It can only mean today is going to be a good day.
Cracking video Simon.
An interesting side note is most of the countries who participated in WW2 used the Browning Hi-Power. Obviously Commonwealth countries used British holsters but most our countries manufactured holsters to their own liking.
Very interesting to see the proofed British/Canadian holsters for the High Power. There are many more from other Countries including the Dutch 1950/60 type that is a varied copy of the Canadian one complete with the metal "pouch" for a mag. I have seen Belgium ones and they are really a world away. Surprising seeing that they invented and made the Weapon. Maybe a timeline of Holsters for the 9mm Browning High Power could be a subject for a future video? Or the different versions made by different Countries?
I’ve got a 58 pattern Holster for my Hi Power Olive Drab
Point out that the pistol won’t fit if there’s a spare magazine in the internal pocket.
It would have been nice if you had identified the official nomenclature for these holsters.
The official nomenclature at the time of sealing is identified on the label accompanying each holster.
@@RiflemanMoore Thank you for your timely response. I have two examples of the last two in your presentation. Where I am confused is that one of mine is dated 1945 (ZL&T Canadian mfg) and the other is dated 1957 (CN/CG/B7146). Therefore, what was the official nomenclature from WWII until 1957? The only difference I can see is that the 1945 dated holster has a leather cleaning rod holder while the newer 1957 holster has a web rod holder. One reference I have lists the 1945 dated holster as "9mm Pistol Holster C No2 MkI" The "Holster, 1957 Patt. canvas" does not sound very official to me considering how well thought out and consistent most British nomenclature usually is.