I love the way the West knew almost to the day when Russia would invade Ukraine. It's like getting made redundant/fired with 13 weeks notice and no prospects of further employment. Fear the worst and hope for the best. Cheers Stuart.
So surreal looking back at these things. I wonder what he’d think if you told him back then that policies would decouple from vaccination rates and mortality rates, discussions of natural immunity would be suppressed, and a western country like Australia would forcibly intern citizens in quarantine camps. Maybe describe the Omicron variant to him with its near-zero mortality rate and how he predicts governments would respond.
Two bad there wasn’t much about Europe or it’s future for that matter. However, I liked when Niall said that Europe is a ‘great regulatory power’ - bullseye! All Europe can do is regulate and hope that some countries would have to go along in order to do business there. Europe has no industry (outside of Germany) no innovation, no army or other way to project power. It has been living on American dime for security, it is being penetrated in the East by Russia and in the South by mongrels from Africa and the Middle East. It nominates failed local politicians to high E.U. posts so that they can be easily outmaneuvered by the Germans who run EU yet pursue their own geopolitical interests and of course leaders from outside the E.U. For example Borrell who went to Russia only to be used by Lavrov to wipe a floor with. When you need leaders and all you got are gender bender wonkers the feature is bleak.
It does have industries and in certain places; particularly in Eastern Europe, there is innovation. We can see evidence in Euro stats high technological products catagory. The problem for Europe, it doesn't have the venture capital needed to sustain these industries.
@@eoinhogan152 Those industries would do just fine we’re it not for EU’s moronic climate policies that will decimate them by rising energy prices and thus making them less competitive vs. German goods produced in China that doesn’t have such limits. Fit for 55 will make Europe to an open-air museum. Europe has a lot of problem and a great majority of them are caused by EU’s own moronic policies.
@@derek3266 Yeah, i see that mate, but I don't see a way around climate change. However, innovative small to medium industries hit with increased taxation is a serious barrier to entry. Allowing the best firms to be exempt is not a bad way of doing it. In my opinion, QE needs to be tapered off. Allow those firms reliant on access to cheap credit to go under and let the market do its worst. The technological infrastructure will be absorbed by more competitive firms kick-starting a new investment equalibrum. It doesn't get around climate concerns but it does mean technological advances can be absorbed by smaller firms.
you prolly dont care but does anyone know of a tool to log back into an Instagram account? I was dumb lost the password. I would love any tricks you can offer me.
Did he say that decentralised is better than centralised in dealing with the health crisis, so it showed benefit of brexit? Well, then he said that the success of China in controlling the virus, doesn’t show the centralised method is better? Because EU is centralised ? Really? But he also said the situation in the U.K. and Belgium are equally bad tho we didn’t have populist government, so the awful control of the virus is not due to populist government, so what’s the reason that they did it worse than a centralised government like China? I don’t get the idea here, is the centralised government like China is much more efficient in terms of dealing with the health crisis, Europe s problem is not centralised I thought, it’s actually coz it’s inefficient because we have lots of countries representing different interests.
The 'future'? 'We' have ten years? “ . . . our best estimate is that the net energy 33:33 per barrel available for the global 33:36 economy was about eight percent 33:38 and that in over the next few years it 33:42 will go down to zero percent 33:44 uh best estimate at the moment is that 33:46 actually the 33:47 per average barrel of sweet crude 33:51 uh we had the zero percent around 2022 33:56 but there are ways and means of 33:58 extending that so to be on the safe side 34:00 here on our diagram 34:02 we say that zero percent is definitely 34:05 around 2030 . . . we 34:43 need net energy from oil and [if] it goes 34:46 down to zero 34:48 uh well we have collapsed not just 34:50 collapse of the oil industry 34:52 we have collapsed globally of the global 34:54 industrial civilization this is what we 34:56 are looking at at the moment . . . “ ruclips.net/video/BxinAu8ORxM/видео.html&feature=emb_logo
Why we human should take sides and camps? Niall you are excellent in pro-white geo political scholar, but I think you should think a bigger picture for all, that is including, European, Asian and Africans
He does at times. Search for his 6 reasons, which made Europe the great imperialistic continent. Niall points out, that China was always no.1 until the Industrial Revolution. And i like to add: China is back in the game and take it back again. Peacfull, pure economical and, in my eyes, rightfully.
I love the way the West knew almost to the day when Russia would invade Ukraine.
It's like getting made redundant/fired with 13 weeks notice and no prospects of further employment. Fear the worst and hope for the best. Cheers Stuart.
So surreal looking back at these things. I wonder what he’d think if you told him back then that policies would decouple from vaccination rates and mortality rates, discussions of natural immunity would be suppressed, and a western country like Australia would forcibly intern citizens in quarantine camps. Maybe describe the Omicron variant to him with its near-zero mortality rate and how he predicts governments would respond.
ty from germany for the upload🥀🌻🍒🇮🇱
Two bad there wasn’t much about Europe or it’s future for that matter. However, I liked when Niall said that Europe is a ‘great regulatory power’ - bullseye! All Europe can do is regulate and hope that some countries would have to go along in order to do business there. Europe has no industry (outside of Germany) no innovation, no army or other way to project power. It has been living on American dime for security, it is being penetrated in the East by Russia and in the South by mongrels from Africa and the Middle East. It nominates failed local politicians to high E.U. posts so that they can be easily outmaneuvered by the Germans who run EU yet pursue their own geopolitical interests and of course leaders from outside the E.U. For example Borrell who went to Russia only to be used by Lavrov to wipe a floor with. When you need leaders and all you got are gender bender wonkers the feature is bleak.
EXACTLY
Especially that idiot Van Rompuy. Farage was so right to criticize him in the European Parliament.
It does have industries and in certain places; particularly in Eastern Europe, there is innovation. We can see evidence in Euro stats high technological products catagory. The problem for Europe, it doesn't have the venture capital needed to sustain these industries.
@@eoinhogan152 Those industries would do just fine we’re it not for EU’s moronic climate policies that will decimate them by rising energy prices and thus making them less competitive vs. German goods produced in China that doesn’t have such limits. Fit for 55 will make Europe to an open-air museum. Europe has a lot of problem and a great majority of them are caused by EU’s own moronic policies.
@@derek3266 Yeah, i see that mate, but I don't see a way around climate change. However, innovative small to medium industries hit with increased taxation is a serious barrier to entry. Allowing the best firms to be exempt is not a bad way of doing it. In my opinion, QE needs to be tapered off. Allow those firms reliant on access to cheap credit to go under and let the market do its worst. The technological infrastructure will be absorbed by more competitive firms kick-starting a new investment equalibrum. It doesn't get around climate concerns but it does mean technological advances can be absorbed by smaller firms.
Great finale.....I will toast Niall Ferguson for his wisdom and prioritisation of English Best Bitter.....
Love the format. Always nice to hear from Niall Ferguson.
you prolly dont care but does anyone know of a tool to log back into an Instagram account?
I was dumb lost the password. I would love any tricks you can offer me.
@Ismael Wyatt instablaster :)
The West is still an area of Enlightenment - We may have to work harder to pull ahead.
„The Strange Death of Europe“ by Douglas Murray
I wish Niall would talk less about the pandemic and more about the subjects he is an expert on.
the next evidence that historians cant predict the future and should not interfere in politics
I think the format for this program is genius. Maybe we should sell democrat as something pleasant instead of a screaming contest.
Not always right - but always very smart. D.A. J.D. NYC
Niall was possible a little optimistic with his choice of song Happy Days.
Well, I'd say that pandemic data do not show that post-Brexit GB has been exactly better off than its former partners.
one year, it approves that Nail was wrong.
Did he say that decentralised is better than centralised in dealing with the health crisis, so it showed benefit of brexit? Well, then he said that the success of China in controlling the virus, doesn’t show the centralised method is better? Because EU is centralised ? Really? But he also said the situation in the U.K. and Belgium are equally bad tho we didn’t have populist government, so the awful control of the virus is not due to populist government, so what’s the reason that they did it worse than a centralised government like China? I don’t get the idea here, is the centralised government like China is much more efficient in terms of dealing with the health crisis, Europe s problem is not centralised I thought, it’s actually coz it’s inefficient because we have lots of countries representing different interests.
Was he roped in in advance to serve as one of the many foils to bamboozle the public?
numbers and infos from china trust-able?
The 'future'?
'We' have ten years?
“ . . . our best estimate is that the net energy
33:33 per barrel available for the global
33:36 economy was about eight percent
33:38 and that in over the next few years it
33:42 will go down to zero percent
33:44 uh best estimate at the moment is that
33:46 actually the
33:47 per average barrel of sweet crude
33:51 uh we had the zero percent around 2022
33:56 but there are ways and means of
33:58 extending that so to be on the safe side
34:00 here on our diagram
34:02 we say that zero percent is definitely
34:05 around 2030 . . .
we
34:43 need net energy from oil and [if] it goes
34:46 down to zero
34:48 uh well we have collapsed not just
34:50 collapse of the oil industry
34:52 we have collapsed globally of the global
34:54 industrial civilization this is what we
34:56 are looking at at the moment . . . “
ruclips.net/video/BxinAu8ORxM/видео.html&feature=emb_logo
.
Why we human should take sides and camps? Niall you are excellent in pro-white geo political scholar, but I think you should think a bigger picture for all, that is including, European, Asian and Africans
He does at times. Search for his 6 reasons, which made Europe the great imperialistic continent. Niall points out, that China was always no.1 until the Industrial Revolution. And i like to add: China is back in the game and take it back again. Peacfull, pure economical and, in my eyes, rightfully.
Ferguson, you show great prejustice. IT'S very obvious.
He speaks the truth .
Wow