I have to admit. I never gave that part of Kant’s critique much of a thought beyond the surface level of the statement. I think Dr. Malabou makes a good case for rethinking how Kant is treating the concept of the Transcendental.
I thought she made a good case too. She definitely contributed something new and valuable to the overall discussion, but I haven't been able to fully grapple with all the implications yet.
@@ChasingLeviathan look up Robert Sapolsky, I believe his email is associated with Stanford... And he just released a new book on his research in neurobiology... Determined.. so, he is interviewing... You will enjoy it 👍 You will love the discussion
I have to admit. I never gave that part of Kant’s critique much of a thought beyond the surface level of the statement. I think Dr. Malabou makes a good case for rethinking how Kant is treating the concept of the Transcendental.
I thought she made a good case too. She definitely contributed something new and valuable to the overall discussion, but I haven't been able to fully grapple with all the implications yet.
@@ChasingLeviathan Kant hasn't been able to fully grapple with himself. We're doomed. 😆
This is amazing, thank you so much. Love the format as well.
Glad you enjoyed it!
This is something very unique and a very handful of wonderful ideas. Lots of love and respect from India. Keep creating contents with such huge minds
Thank you for stopping by!
It's pronounced Purse. Charles Purse. Like Bond. James Bond.
Yes. It had been years since I had heard his name. As soon as she corrected me, I knew she was right. 🤦♂️🤣
Maybe, if you want to bring knowledge of neurobiology, why not bring a neurobiologist?
I'm not against that. We'll see what guests we can get moving forward.
@@ChasingLeviathan look up Robert Sapolsky, I believe his email is associated with Stanford...
And he just released a new book on his research in neurobiology... Determined.. so, he is interviewing...
You will enjoy it 👍
You will love the discussion