Quickie: Velvet Buzzsaw
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 окт 2024
- Patreon: / yms
Edited by: / heyodamo
Twitch: / adumplaze
Donate: bit.ly/ZlAuEL
Website: www.YourMovie.S...
Reddit: / yms
Twitter: / 2gay2lift
Facebook: / yourmoviessuck
Discord: / discord
Music: www.anUnkindnes...
Music channel: / anunkindnessvideo
Gaming channel: / adumplaze
Plazethroughs: / adumplazethroughs
Vlog channel: / darkoceanadam
Podcast: / sardonicast
Bitcoin: www.yourmovies... Telegram: t.me/YMSTelegram
It’s funny how Natalie Dyer was there just to react to people dying.
I really wanted her to find Rhodora at the end.
I was just waiting for her to become jaded and just exclaim "OH FOR F***S SAKE!"
@@jmalmsten she did go "OH FUCK ME"
I thought the cops would pin them on her but this isn’t real life
@@kujo4388 ME TOO
Awww people were really hyped up about this so that's a bummer.
Kelsie I don’t see why. It looked dumb in the trailer
@@DendyJungle bc of Jake Gyllenhaal
@@DendyJungle but it looked the right kind of dumb
It's not as bad as he makes it out to be. If you go in sort of knowing that it's like an over-the-top satire of the art world mixed with over-the-top Argento-esque supernatural horror, it's pretty enjoyable. Sloppy, but enjoyable.
I thought the trailer looked like a really interesting idea. Bummer that it's apparently terrible. :(
I liked it just fine.
It is basically a well produced "Tales from the Crypt" episode.
It is goofy, but I kind of dug it.
Sorely needed Ongo Gablogian, the world's greatest art critic.
He is the yeast of thoughts and mind.
*Bullshit.*
*Bullshit!*
*Derivative!*
Phillip Reynolds lll
Charmed I’m sure
The Cinema Monologues We're all just air conditioners, aren't we?
Another thing about this movie is that, I don't think the concept of possessed art is bad, in fact, it could actually be really fun. But that's the problem, the movie is self-absorbed in its own message it gets in the way of telling an entertaining/investing story. At some point, you're just waiting for somebody to get killed one after the other, and nothing progresses to anything satisfying.
Hey MMM, how goes it?
"Nothing progresses to anything satisfying" might as well define the whole movie.
@@espurious Well DipMeInSHIET, Espurious, how the fuck goes it?
@@politure Exactly, the whole movie is waiting for the plot to kick in, and whenever it does, the movie is already over.
It could have been a great comedy. It was at first anyway. But as you say it went nowhere.
Rather than the art just killing people, it should have just driven those who viewed it mad with desire. Then the characters start doing crazy (and violent) things to get hold of the paintings. That would have been a bit more contained and meaningful than just "horror art".
But I disagree a lot with Adam's review on this. It started quite strong for me and I was interested and amused. Just had nowhere to go.
I swear to god if he becomes the next rise and fall director (like M. Night Shyamalan)...
So disappointing considering Nightcrawler is one of my favourite movies and I love Jake Gylenhaal.
He already did
He is
Hi captain underpants
He would have to rise first. Night crawler had nowhere near the social impact the sixth sense did despite being a really solid movie
Wait a saw made out of velvet wouldn’t do much
Can you guys stop turning the comment section into a bloody shitpost warfront?
Khalid Faisal oh yeah yeah
Reuben Seymour someone help me RUclips wont give me the option to turn my profile pic back
*tHaT's NoT wHaT iT mEaNs YoU iDiOt!!1!1*
kremit the frog because the movie is about killer paintings
Critique is so limiting, and emotionally draining.
I feel like most of Adam’s critiques are that movies are limiting themselves with predictable, cliche stories or by trying to replicate other movies that did well financially. (Obviously he critiques things like poor acting and sound design, but I don’t think anyone would those limiting).
Why even post your comment on the channel of an art critic? Are you saying that criticism isn’t valuable?
ToyKnives dude it's a line from the movie
Dear God please don't quote this dumpster fire of a film
@@Shakenmike117 😂
Honestly, the only good thing to come out of this film and I was waiting to use it on Adum but you beat me to it 😂
that glass sphere is just the gay test from drawn together
Jake's performance in nightcrawler is a masterpiece.
his eyes are actually sick looking in that film
@@NickSmith-qv4lh I know right!? One of my favorite performances of all time.
@@valitsaki1924 The Oscars snubbed him. I would have nominated him over Bradley Cooper.
"No one learns anything by the end of the movie." YES. That was my main concern. I honestly liked the camp, but I didn't feel at all satisfied when everyone was just dead.
I’ve been working in a gallery for as long as I’ve been alive and I found velvet buzzsaw hilarious
The only fyre festival documentary worth seeing is internet historian's
preach
For real. That's the main reason I haven't even attempted to watch the documentary.
Why is everyone riding IH's dick so hard? His video on Fyre festival really isn't anything special.
the fyre doc is better than the IH video because it has the bahamas customs dick sucking interview
yea no thanks, i'd rather watch a well-reviewed, fully made production if i'm gonna get info on the topic, not some random youtube video.
So I know probably nobody wants to read a random commenter's dissertation on the movie after watching Adum's take, but I just can't shake this goddamn movie for some reason.
The whole time I was watching it, I kept waiting for it to commit. Commit to a tone (I was assuming black comedy); commit to a theme; commit to a major POV character - anything. And it never did, and to me, that's why it was so dissatisfying.
I think that if it had aspired to be something more than a cheap mockery of the art industry and a cheesy horror film that it could have been really special. Maybe make a point about how the culture around outsider art is basically the consumption and regurgitation of something created in a "pure" form. Maybe discuss how knowing the crimes of an artist may effect the way a person views their work. Maybe leave the paintings obscured and have the characters react in a variety of different ways to the images as a reflection of their own inner turmoil.
My intensity of dislike and confusion comes from how much promise this movie had, and how badly most of the actors wanted to elevate it above the source material.
I watched the first ten minutes with my roommate who’s a filmmaker. He hyped it up and we were sorely disappointed. I then rewatched “The Wailing.”
Source Material? Is this movie based on something?
@@iansmart4158 Sorry, that was a weird turn of phrase on my part. I meant the script. As far as I know it's an original screenplay.
More often than not the films and tv shows I get the most upset about are the ones where huge potentials were squandered. Where it promises greatness but fails to deliver. It's why I'll rant forever about my frustrations around Christoffer Nolans films and Black Mirror and such. Yet I'll just shake off the random mainstream fluff that never tries.
@@Hippiethecat124 Really well said, thanks. Halfway through the movie I kept thinking "oh ok so *this* is the real thread for the movie", like when Morf goes into that whale echo-chamber thing and then has a determined plan together with Natalia Dyer's character. But then it all just fizzles out and gives way to cheap 'everyone is dying in mysterious circumstances one by one' horror tropes. Just totally lacked direction.
What a shame. Nightcrawler is one of my absolute favorite movies, I'm surprised they had such a drastic change in quality.
S P O I L E R
The last death scene with the tatoo of the buzzsaw killing the old lady is one of the dumbest death scene that I've ever seen
If it hadn't been at the very end of the movie, I would have shut it off right then.
It looked so bad and happened so fast. It's a pity because the parallel with the painting in that scene was kind of cool and made me think something interesting would happen.
TrashTank right?? The ending wouldn’t have been so bad if it ended right where it matched the painting.
TrashTank
I wonder what the conclusion of the investigation would be.
“Ghosts are real, may avenge exploitation of artistic expression via ironic death. Obey Clothing to cease production immediately.”
Sounds like I'm the only person who liked it. I love the misdirection - when we see the painting, we think the shadows are coming from two individuals perhaps about to kill the woman. But no, the shadows are just from bushes. Then the buzzsaw tattoo comes to life... I don't know, maybe I liked it just because it was one of the movie's better kills, but that's not really saying much, I guess.
Velvet cake is pretty good
Where the bloody hell have you’ve been?
Khalid Faisal oh yeah yeah
red velvet cake its moist with yummy cream
Hey where's that profile pic from? I'm asking for a friend.
Yeah, a friend
I was so disappointed in this movie. It's like someone ghostwrote/directed Nighcrawler and this is the first time he actually did it himself
or the other way around, being nice and all...
@Climax DeAbsurdum plenty of great regisseurs who did movies for netflix turned out bad, I think there is something happening on the inside that we are not aware of, maybe they dont even get full control of these projects, idk.
they never explain the rules to how the art kills people, it makes no sense. Also WHY DID JOSEPHINA BREAK INTO A CAR JUST TO HONK THE HORN REALLY LOUDLY?
It's so "deep" that rather than explain it they just assume an understanding of the theme of "punishing those who profit from art without a respect, love, or meaningful contribution to the medium"
Pretty sure she just opened the unlocked door to honk the horn for the owner to hear it and come move.
Why did the paintings burn themselves? Did they want to be destroyed? Then why not just burn all of them? Why burn some and not others? Why did the guy at the gas station die? He didn't profit from the art. Why and how do the Dease paintings infect other art? Isn't "art" a subjective term? Especially within the art critic scene? Why couldn't the paintings take over a beautiful house or a landscape or a billboard? Do they want to keep killing people? Was Coco ever investigated after all her boses died one after the other? Did she ever get a good job?
Adam Jensen
I just feel bad for Emma who probably has to move back to Michigan now
A better question is why TF she walked into an art gallery that very clearly didn't exist 0.5 seconds earlier?!???
I wanted so badly for this movie to be great from seeing Gyllenhaal was in it and knowing how amazing Nightcrawler was but Velvet Buzzsaw was sooooo bad and what makes me more mad is the fact there was so much potential sitting right there for an amazing horror/thriller film. They bring up the blood in the paint and Dease's history for no payoff other than 'get a load of this creepy guy he was actually pretty crazy huh!!!1!'. They could've easily used the mirror imagery of Sphere to create a much more terrifying leadup to that woman's death than the predictable way she died. The last few deaths in the movie were equally awful. The subtle uneasiness of the paintings should've been used much better especially considering how normal it is for the viewer to feel like they're being watched by a painting. Instead it was paintings of figures with practically no eyes to execute that effect in the first place and just random jump scares throughout. The comedy and cheesy deaths made this movie so campy when it really could've been something very interesting (and cool to see considering the whole movie's based on the art world meaning they easily had every opportunity to try out different styles of film or incorporating techniques you see less in movies and more in the art field!!).
I think I could easily sum up this mess by how my artist friends described the awkward gallery settings: none of these pieces go together who the hell did this?
Yeah I pretty much agree with that totally. The potential was huge and unlike Adam I actually liked the stupid laughable art elitism stuff. John Don Don is the best art promoter's name ever. It rolls off the nasal passages.
I loved Jake Gyllenhaal's nic cage impression. "Something crazy is GOING ON"
Agreed. I got high, ordered food, and grabbed a blanket for this movie and ended up watching reruns of Atlanta half way through
I couldn't even enjoy it at just a popcorn-movie level. It felt like it had a hundred things it wanted to do and say and rather than choose the best it decided to mush them all in. There's cheesy horror with serious psychological horror with jump scares and overt black comedy mixed in with what must've been meant as strong social commentary.
I didn't know this was the same person who made Nightcrawler though, so I'm glad I didn't have to fall off my expectations to land on my opinions.
Wait a minute...you aren't Rich Evans?
He doesnt sound nearly as drunk as Rich (but whom among us is?)
STAR DESTROYERS
IM GONNA CUUUUUUUM
No that's Mr. Plinkett
It also broke new ground....
@@briankaslewicz6130 Actually I am quite certain Rich does not drink. Everybody else does on that show. Surprising? Indeed.
I want to know what review hurt Dan so much that he gave the most likeable and redeemed character a horrible death just because he gave some bad reviews to artists as if he’s obligated to not upset the artists. Dan Gilroy also cannot direct Horror, it was shot like a drama or something, the lighting and cinematography were particularly terrible and even laughable.
Ehh, I don't think it's really supposed to fair. The ghost or whatever is supposed to punish those who profit from the medium without integrity or respect for it. So i guess his willingness to let his relationships with others dictate his reviews and his pretentious refusal to admit to misunderstanding something made it so he qualified. It's still a weirdly shot, and poorly realised movie though.
It’s not a good thing when a movie released within the same month filmed on a iPhone has better cinematography than yours. It’s even more jarring when you realize the cinematographer for Velvet Buzzsaw is fucking Robert Elswit, the same man who has done cinematography for a good amount of Paul Thomas Anderson films.
The fact that the title is the tattoo of one of the characters and plays no part whatsoever until the very 2 last minutes of the movie is a pretty good indication that this film isn't well planned.
Too bad, I was really excited to see two of my fav actors (Jake and Toni) together in a movie about art.
ADUM you should’ve done the review BEFORE I decided to see this waste of a movie goddammit. The only good “horror” part was
(SPOILERS!!!!)
how they found the lady with her arm sawed off because everyone thought it was part of the exhibit and the kids came in and were spreading the blood around and everyone was taking pictures with what they thought was a fake dead body. It was both hilarious but the concept itself is unsettling, and was the only good part of the movie.
Interestingly, something like that has already happened in the past. Some lady got stabbed in the MOMA (I think?) and people thought it was some sort of performance art at first. She was helped eventually, though.
Simon Torres or the clowns who were known for one clown hitting the other with a axe but one day the receiving clown forgot to wear the wooden helmet under his wig so he got down and the other clown desperately tried to call for help but the audience didn’t got it and believed its part of the performance
The fucking delivery of that scene was absolutely awful though. Josephina's lines were spoken in the most boring way possible and throughout the movie at any emotional part, it was difficult to see her as anything more than a text-reader.
I could barely even get through it. It was awful
I saw an hour and couldn't stand anymore.
i dropped out after 10
I think that's why I like it. It feels like Showgirls
I had to come back to it 3 Times just to finish it
Gave up after 13 minutes 😂
I wasted 2 hours of my life waiting for this movie to make sense. :(
Less than two minutes thirty in and you've already made me want to see this way more than any other movie I've seen you review.
ooh flippant bisexual that old trope
Velvet Buzzsaw isn’t a bad film by any stretch, as a film about the soullessness of the the upperclass art world it works brilliantly.
it beats you over the head with it's velvet buzzsaw
but the scene where toni colettes character dies in the museum and no one realizes it because they think its an art piece and the children play in her blood is so hilarious, thats just how modern art is
Good thing they kicked me outta art school I guess
What did you do??
@@worrywirt tried to make original content
@@isc4488 good one smart guy lmao
@@isc4488 no worries, I'm studying biology instead, no plans for ww3
@@thrashbin2001 what are your thoughts on Judaism?
The art is based on the story of Henery Darger. Down the rabbit whole has an amazing video on it. It kinda helps understand the insperation for the film
The kills and story were pretty cliché. Also all the criticisms of the art community have been done a 1000 times. There is only so many times the “is this piece of trash art?” joke can be done.
Even the “modern art” felt dated. The art gallery looked like it belonged in the 80-90s. (Look up the Miami Art Basel website to see the real gallery they shot at) It’s clear the writers are old and out of touch with the art scene they are parodying.
@@bree320 every death was also spolked in the trailer
Salty Player damn that sucks. The premise is interesting, but the execution was bad.
Makes me want some red velvet cake, so that's a plus.
"A gay, but also bisexual art critic"? Or just "A bisexual art critic", you simpleton. He plays a bisexual art critic. Bisexual people do exist you know. You don't have to be either gay or straight.
G. Day Uh actually the characters is said to be portrayed as gay unfortunately. I don’t know why a lot of movies portray a “gay”character in a heterosexual story arch before a bisexual character. What’s the point? If anything it’s a disservice to gays and bisexuals.
@@Dellennickolis95 Who says the character is portrayed as gay? The writer? The director? Gyllenhaal? Who or what is your source?
You seem him as bi? I thought he was gay but straight for that one girl
Takeo Masaki Thats pretty bisexual to me. But yeah the writers written him as “gay”
He's not strictly bisexual. The only woman he wants to pork is Josephina because he's kind of obsessed with her beauty (because really, her character has zero redeeming qualities). Maybe he sees her like art in human form and that's why he's so interested in her. He gives zero indications to be attracted to any other woman in the movie.
The whole artist using blood to make his paintings reminds me of a Tales from the Crypt episode "Easel Kill Ya"
I tried watching it and after 30 minutes I just shut it off I was so bored.
I don't mean to be rude, but why share a comment like this? Is it because you feel solidarity with others who feel the same? Because all this comment does is dunk on something that's already getting dunked on with no explanation or POV.
Again, I'm not trying to be rude (this might come off that way), I just find these kind of comments unneeded.
@@iansmart4158 Literally I just said what happened. It looked interested from the Netflix preview but I couldn't finish it because nothing felt like it was happening 30 minutes in. It's not that deep my dude.
The one area in which Netflix excels is in original documentaries. Their true crime and serial killer docs (usually in 3 to 5 episode series) are almost all top notch.
ADUM WE WANT THAT MOREL OREL REVIEW like this so Adam can see this
I had a really fun time watching this movie. It seemed there was so much potential at the beginning of the movie since I went into it blind, but it was so god damn ridiculous I couldn't help but just laugh and enjoy how silly it eventually got. The characters were insufferable.
I would recommend watching this movie as a dark comedy. If you go into it expecting something SUPER serious you'll be disappointed. The best way I can describe it is it's The Shinning meets Beetlejuice. I thoroughly enjoyed it. 7.5 out of 10 for me.
It starts out like it's going to be a smooth flashy satire on the LA art world, with a lot of visual and music cues to Mary Harron's American Psycho and Jake in fine form but then it quickly devolves into just a crappy 'And Then There Were None' style kill-off. Even the deaths don't make stylistic sense; they occur in no order, for no reason and sometimes there's no real connection between then and the vengeful spirit of the dead artist.
Dan Gilroy? More like M. Night
On the Fyre festival documentary, it was hilarious how many parallels I could draw between Billy and the place my dad used to work, it's such a mess.
I could almost- almost!- believe that he was just really pigheaded and that he didn't intend for it to be such a huge disaster, if it weren't for him doing those horrifically obvious scams like.... days after he was let off on bail.
Velvet Buzzsaw, at first it was good, then it was what, self parody? Asking for a friend
This was a movie that had so much potential.
Ive been trying to watch the film and yeah everything is really messy? I enjoyed the first half a lot but once it got to the meat of the film it feels like it lost itself. it was really confused in tone. i wanted to enjoy it so im disappointed.
the saddest thing is that Toni Collete was in this movie. She went from an amazing film to this.
So are you saying bi sexual men cant be feminine without being gay what exactly confused you ?
Joshing Up its said that the character is gay, I don’t see the point in this just make em bisexual if he’s going to be into men and women but nope,
They opened up the movie saying he was gay , just to have him be part of a heterosexual relationship for the bulk of the film.
Jack Neblung yeah there’s no point of him being gay.
So i just saw:
And it waaaaas, bad (90%)
Ok (9%)
Pretty good! (1%)
Hard disagree on this one, I liked it but might not rewatch. I agree that it was lacking in depth but I think if you're seeing it as purely horror schlock you're missing out on the intentional humor of the movie's world.
The intentional humor of giving everyone goofy names and making them unlikable isn't funny or compelling, it's just annoying
@@Shakenmike117 they are not suppose to be likeable
Baixandoa10kbps s you cant give an argument of why something is bad as “it’s meant to be”
You don’t need to watch the film, everything is given away in the trailer, the characters suck, the script sucks, it’s shot terribly bar 2 shots that I thought were well done and you can predict how it will go when it introduces “Dease”
@@Shakenmike117 Literally every episode of Tales From the Crypt is unlikable characters who you want to die by the end, add puns.
@@MisterBrimm You're comparing a rated R film directed by the man behind Nightcrawler to Tales from the Crypt in terms of character quality.
Really jazzed at how prolific you're being lately Adam. Hope you're enjoying making stuff as much as I enjoy watching them!
Typical Netflix's original
*"i just wanna drape myself in velvet"*
So is he the new M. Night Shamaladingdong or what
On my 2nd viewing of this, I liked it 1000% more. My first time around, when it first came out, I actually shut it off half way in. Some of the moments still fell flat but I actually liked the performances this time round. I revisited this bc the new candyman movie had a lot of parallels. The "more to it" is there but not well rounded. The line "what's the point of art" and the ending shot of Malkovich drawing in the sand tied up the theme more than the entire film. The horror element didn't work but the movie was much better this time around. Still not great but better than a 3/10. Love you Adum. Can't wait for Lion King, if it hasn't driven you mad by now lol. Horse.
Im glad you didnt like it Adam, I didnt like it either.
Sometimes you dislike movies on completely subjective grounds, and this is one of those times.
I love my nachos my mom makes. You should have some. Yum yum!!
I am still absolutely dumbfounded that they put an airplane sound effect right when he was about to go to town on her.
This is probably a dumb question, but does anyone know if the clip of music at the very beginning is from anything? It's so short I have know idea how to search for it, but it sounds really cool.
Bumping this i wanna know too
It will never cease to amaze me how somebody can ruin such a simple concept like Velvet Buzzsaw. it practically writes itself.
I know this movie has a ton of flaws but i really enjoyed watching it although I wouldn't watch it again. Not surprised YMS didn't care for it but the 3/10 surprised me.
Another movie where the entire plot and almost every death\CGI scene is shown in the trailer. Amazing
I really love Jake Gyllenhaal but ffs why I dont see him in good movies lately...
Didn't Nocturnal animals come out just a short while ago? Then again I'm pretty old, so two years = yesterday to me lol
oh shit I actually enjoyed "Stronger" and it was out 2017... Gee, time goes fast man.
"...mistook a girl's high collar for a neck brace..." - LOL, same here.
I was expecting some interesting deaths and stuff but it got really boring.
honestly liked this, the characters were uniquely entertaining jerks and i wanna believe it was made as a parody of high art, whodunnit detective stories and horror movies all at the same time. doesn't really excuse the lame deaths and sometimes off directing but still wouldn't give it anything less than a 6/10, I don't regret watching it
Here before people make mediocre infinity war and moist comments
Your already late
or no comment at all - just like you did right here.
I think if you don't take this movie seriously it's kind of enjoyable. The problem is the first half hour or so fails to establish it as a sort of satire and it just ends up feeling weird.
Dease....
Eyes have seen a lot of loves, but they're never gonna see another lover like you..
Knutz
That's even more appropriate since the band is Canadian.
Agree entirely. I was cracking up any time Jake was in a scene, I looked forward to them the most. I fell asleep really well to this. 🍁
1:11 Is that Hila Klein?
The dumbest part about the big sphere thing is that it isn't an art piece by Dease, so it shouldn't be haunted and able to kill people.
Don't stone me but I actually kinda liked this movie?
Same here
I enjoy this channel's reviews, not because I always agree with his opinion on films, but because he actually articulates why he does or doesn't like something instead of just taking cheap shots at it. After a while, you begin to get a feel for what types of movies he does or doesn't like, and can judge if you will actually like them or not based on how your own preferences tend to line up or differ from his. Fun review, but I'm guessing I will still watch this one, lol. Thanks for all the work you do to introduce us to films!
Dease nuts 😎
"Fuck yeah!" - me seeing a notification for a new video.
*Netflix needs to stop making movies.*
If you throw enough crap at a wall, something will stick.
Roma?
BSJ IN YO HOUSE *roma*
@@barrybensonssidechick9296 Did Netflix actually produce Roma though? Or was it just the distributor? I think Netflix both produced and distributed Velvet Buzzsaw.
Shirkers, Private Life, Roma, and Happy as Lazzaro are all quite good and they came out last year. High Flying Bird came out this year and it's good. I don't understand why the terrible movies become popular on Netflix. No one liked Bird Box and yet it's supposedly the most viewed Netflix original movie?
Know what would've been a better movie? A psychological thriller based around a character who sees an art piece and becomes obsessed with it, going further and further into their delusions of what the painting means. Starting off simple with sketching it, leading to meeting up with the artist to try and get the hidden meaning, to eventually kidnapping and torturing the artist, convinced they arent sharing the "true meaning"
not to be taken seriously is the whole point. meta-meta commentary ?. perfect comment. so on the nose btw. a 3rd choice cheesy sometimes real sometimes ridicoulus sometimes just funny-stupid mirror .a revenge (2nd class because they dont deserve any better) on the LA art scene. waiting for it to be more to it....but it never happens......once you where punk ,"velvet buzzsaw" but you lost your sight and you dont know what you want anymore. abuse, soulessness, mutilation, cheesy obvious horrific elements. yeah 4-5 out of 10. not recomendable. not to be watched again. did i miss something ?? i dont think so...perfect summary ? oh, i noticed all innocent characters get away. not you tho .... ADAM
Or you're just wrong, and it was a shit movie.
Director Dan Gilroy credits The Ring (2002) as one of his inspirations for making this film.
This is John Malkovich's third horror film. Malkovich's first two horror films are Mary Reilly (1996) and Bird Box (2018).
Both Rene Russo and Jake Gyllenhaaal are part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. While Russo was Freya through Thor and Thor: the Dark World, Gyllenhall had his debut in Spider Man: Far from Home, taking the mantle of Mysterio.
Zawe Ashton and Jake Gyllenhaal were both in Nocturnal Animals (2016), which also was at times set in the art world. This time around they do share screen time together.
thanks, trivia bot.
I think Jake gylenhal is using this movie to come out of the closet good for him
You think Brokeback Mountain wouldn't have done the job?
He played a gay dude, didnt touch a single dude, and plowed a girl like 5 times. I think he used this movie for quite the opposite in fact.
I couldn’t agree more, but instead of goosebumps I was reminded of dr who. Also I thought you’d mention that the reason all the art is haunted is apparently because Dease put his own blood in the paint but all the other art that wasn’t made by him starts moving and killing people too (????)
I really liked it, I think you're just too much of a film snob to genuinely enjoy a horror film ;)
thezionsoho "Horror"
He compared it to Goosebumps, and I have to disagree. A Goosebumps episode or novel is way more entertaining.
thezionsoho lel
Bold of you to call this a horror film
I'm not a "film snob" and i found it boring af, i remember trying to not fall asleep when there was still 10 minutes of runtime
I don't know, the way you described this film makes it sound pretty funny.
It's a gr8 comedy ?? I laughed a lot
In the fyre festival there was some guys involved that helped with the movie so like, they covered up the fact that they were involved with the whole thing and acted like they were the victims
Velvet buzzsaw had me laughing from start to finish tbh. But I didn't have any expectations entering the experience.
If I'm not mistaken, fyre festival was botched due in part to the company handling it, and that same company also had direct ties to the doc that went on Netflix, which conveniently leaves them out of the picture.
The doc on hulu seems to be more balanced on placing fair blame on all parties involved, including the "powers that be".
I loved the characters (which is different from liking them), I wish it had just been a non-supernatural high art drama with some satire mixed in.
This was so good, i dont get how you could dislike it
I kept thinking there was a purpose to the attacks, or there be some grand reveal. Life imitating Art.. even sets it up towards the end, but no. When a movie leaves me with more questions than I came with, it pulls the movie apart.
I'm so glad you voiced a reaction to this trash. I kept waiting for Jake to be the killer or for a couple minutes thought the handyman/artist would somehow comeback... something... Anything other than just a ghost story. And what was with the cgi at that last shot of the tattoo buzzsaw. I laughed! Mabe this was a comedy...
if you want to experience an art museum come to life, you should just play "Ib"
i like how i can tell what the general sentiment will be from the tone of voice in the first 5 seconds of the video
I liked that music sync at the end when you said 3 outta 10