Communion on the tongue or in the hand? The revelations of the Virgin Mary to Sister Agnes of Akita.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 апр 2024
- Communion on the tongue or in the hand? The revelations of the Virgin Mary to Sister Agnes of Akita.🙏✝
The bishop immediately interpreted the secret revelation made by the Virgin Mary. In 1973, Our Lady appeared to a nun in Akita, Japan. The apparition was approved, and Cardinal Ratzinger, then Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, affirmed that it was a continuation of Fatima. Several extraordinary and supernatural events occurred. However, it is now primarily remembered for its final message, that of October 13, the date of the Miracle of the Sun at Fatima. In the message, she warned that the work of the devil would infiltrate the Church, causing conflicts and persecutions against faithful priests. And unless men repent, the Heavenly Father would send fire from the sky. One of the significant messages received there concerned how Heaven prefers the Eucharist to be received, whether in the hand or in the mouth, which went unnoticed. Here, we will discuss how the Heavenly message at Akita relates to the reception of the Eucharist with the hand or in the mouth, and the Heavenly preference for communion.
Our videos are unique and dedicated to spreading the Catholic Faith. We work with passion and invite you to subscribe to the channel for free. By doing so, you can support us and share with those who wish to follow the path of our Lord Jesus. Thank you from the bottom of our hearts!
#communion #prophecy #eucharist #jesus #christ #virgin #padrepio #prayer #god #madonna #virginmary #faith
![A Day To Remember: Feedback [OFFICIAL VIDEO]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/iXVnysmQ4e0/mqdefault.jpg)
I went to Catholic school all my life and was taught only the consecrated hands of the priest is allowed to touch the body and blood of Jesus.
Amen!
I've asked our parish priest if we can now receive Communion by the tongue, since there is no more threat of Covid but he told me that that he prefers Communion by the hand. So, what we can do? we have to follow our parish priest.
@@zinniaezeemunoz9569my family and I never receive in the hand and our priest doesn't like that but he gives Communion on the tongue regardless. You NEED to take Holy Communion only on the tongue. He cannot refuse you. Do it and you will see. Especially now that you know it is wrong to touch The Holy Host with un consecrated hands.
@@fran2177receiving communion on the tongue or hand is actually not a reason I think your priest also misunderstood if you understand accepting Christ in our lives is one of the things we need to know, our hearts if we open our hearts and do not repent of sin it is worse than sacrilege mouth or hand can sin so receiving communion in the hand or tongue is no exception and don't follow your own heart too much
I experienced healing was receiving communion in the hand
I came into the Catholic Church back in 2019 and always recd on the tongue. Could not imagine receiving in the hand with all those "crumbs" of Jesus going who knows where. Sad to think about.
Amen.
I will never receive communion in my hands again, THANK YOU FOR THIS VIDEO & MESSAGE. God Bless 🙏❤️
And only received communion from the priest who has consagrated hands to touch the body of Jesus....never from laundry people or deacon
@@MariadeJesus-dt4ql The bit about conecrated hands in poppycock; in the 1917 code of Canon law, deacons were allowed to distribute Communion - and their hands were not consecrated as they were not yet ordained. We already live in a time where there are an insufficent number of priests; and if you are in a situation where there is no priest available, but there may be a Communion service, I would hpe that you would not refuse to receive Christ in Communion.
On the tongue, that's the best and most respectful way to receive our Lord.🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Thank you for this video. God bless you. I am an Indian woman who was receving the Body of Christ on the tongue till I left India. During COVID outbreak, the Churches made it compulsory to receive the Body of Christ in the hands. Few months ago, my left palm started itchy during the Holy Mass. I couldn't understand the reason until I watch this video today. But inspired by few people who receive the the Body of Christ on the tongue, I also started receiving the Holy Body of our Lord on the tongue by kneeling. This act makes me more closer to my Lord than before. Thanks be to God for His grace...🙏❤🙏
Is Akita approved for the whole Church or only it’s local diocese?
Since the pandemic started almost all our churches here gives communion in the hand until now, so for me and my family we do not recieve Holy Communion we Pray the Spiritual Communion.
Just type what St. Thomas Aquinas say about Eucharist who can touch it
The holy Eucharist upon consecration becomes the true body n blood of the son of God Jesus,, because our Lord an savior is Holy,the priest is holy enough to touch our Lord Jesus in the sacrife of the holy mass,but we lay people are not holy enough to touch the body n blood of Jesus,that we have to receive Jesus in the mouth coz our hands are not holy to receive Christ
@@eleanorbuenaventura481 yes that is absolutely true and truth why our Bishop and some many priests realise it and fatima's message many dont believe have mercy on them Lord Jesus Christ
Definitely on the tongue! Many churches teach First Holy Communicants that they can choose whichever they want. I believe all should receive on the tongue. Amen.❤
I believe you are not the Pope - and several have continued with the change of discipline to allow both means of reception.
Since my childhood, I received my Lord Jesus Christ, true God and true Man on my tongue and knees. I will continue continue to receive my Lord on my tongue and on my knees. Hope and pray that the whole whole Catholic world receive our Lord on our tongues and preferably on our knees. Amen.
When a R. Catholic takes communion during the mass, which aspect of Jesus' body does he believe he is eating?
1. His broken, bruised, bleeding, crucified body before God pours out His wrath on Jesus?
2. His body which has become sin for us and on which God is pouring out His full fury and wrath?
3. His resurrected and glorified body?
The mind of a R. Catholic knows that it is idiocy to believe that he can physically eat Jesus (God is spirit and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth John 4:24) so he must use religious sounding phrases eg , "most blessed sacrament", "holy sacrifice of the mass", "liturgy of the eucharist", "transubstantiation" etc to quell his logical and common sense objections.
The John Chpt. 6 passages where Jesus spoke of "eating His flesh and drinking His blood" are unrelated to the Passover as it was not the time of Passover and it was not in Jerusalem. He was teaching in the synagogue in Capernaum and was speaking of "COMING to Him and BELIEVING on Him" (John 6:35). He was referring to His Word, for he is the Word of God (John 1:1 & Rev. 19:13). We are to "eat" and "drink" His Word.
Heb.10: 12 tells us "but He, having offered one sacrifice for sins for all time, sat down at the right hand of God", where He is remaining until He returns to gather His bride. (He is not coming up and down from heaven in wafers and wine at the whim of sinful deluded "priests").
One "eats" God's Word by believing it and meditating upon it:
Isaiah 51:16 "I (the Lord) have put my words in your mouth ...".
Ezekiel 3:1 "... eat this scroll and go and speak to the House of Israel".
Jeremiah 15:16 "Your words were found and I did eat them ..."
Revelation 10:10 " I (John) took the little book out of the angel's hand and ate it".
The serious student of God's Word who loves Jesus and is filled with the Holy Spirit knows that Jesus often spoke in parables and used metaphors e.g. "I am the Door, the Vine, the Good Shepherd". He explained to His disciples that He did this so that those who had "eyes to see" (truly seeking to know the truth) would see but that those whose hearts were hardened (religious) would not be able to see beyond the literal words.
R. Catholics have been duped by satan through their religion. "God our Savior desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the Truth" (1 Tim 2:4).
"Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears My voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and will dine with him, and he with Me" Rev. 3:20. What is the new spiritually regenerated believer going to dine on with the Lord? - His Word, the Truth.
@@mitchellosmer1293The Consecrated Host contains the Father, The Son, and the Holy Ghost, because we cannot separate the Trinity. They are always One.Amen. You are really missing the mark! Amen
@@CharlesDayon quote---The Consecrated Host contains the Father, The Son, and the Holy Ghost, because we cannot separate the Trinity. They are always One... unquote
PROVE IT!!! All you have to say are worthless opinions. NO FACTS!! No scripture!!
I'll say this and ask questions.
At the Eucharist, The bread and wine are "consecrated by the priest turned into the blood/body of Christ!!
Now, , next time do this. When you receice the 'body" of Christ, LOOK at it. What does it LOOK like?? Flesh or bread??
Smell it. Smell like human flesh, or bread???? Taste it. Taste like human flesh, or bread??? If you say human flesh, you are a liar!!! If you say bread, then when did it change back to it's natural form between you and the priest???
--The "blood" of Christ--- Look at it. Look like wine, or human blood??? Smell it. Smell like human blood or wine? (Should smell metallic). taste it!! Taste like wine, or human blood?? IT Should taste metallic!!! If you say it taste like human blood, you again are a liar. If you say bread, then WHEN did it change back to it's original state between you and the priest???
------John 6:61 Aware that his disciples were grumbling about this, Jesus said to them, “Does this offend you? 62 Then what if you see the Son of Man ascend to where he was before! 63 The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you-they are full of the Spirit and life. 64 Yet there are some of you who do not believe.” For Jesus had known from the beginning which of them did not believe and who would betray him. 65 He went on to say, “This is why I told you that no one can come to me unless the Father has enabled them.”
WHY did they walk away????
Mitzvot (Jewish Laws) #192. Not to eat blood.
(Leviticus 3:17)
DO NOT EAT BLOOD!!!!! READ verse 63 AGAIN!!!
63 The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you-they are full of the Spirit and life."
One "eats" God's Word by believing it and meditating upon it:
Isaiah 51:16 "I (the Lord) have put my words in your mouth ...".
Ezekiel 3:1 "... eat this scroll and go and speak to the House of Israel".
Jeremiah 15:16 "Your words were found and I did eat them ..."
Revelation 10:10 " I (John) took the little book out of the angel's hand and ate it".
----You are really missing the mark! Amen
Thank you. I have always done the same since I was little. May God bless you and keep you safe. Peace be with you. 🙏🏼🛐✝️🪽😇
I was taught reverence for the Eucharist. Women dressed in revealing party clothes and men also not appropriately dressed. I miss the kneeler or communion rail. The line looks like a like an entertainment line.
Receiving communion in the mouth is a great reverence to the body and blood of christ.some priests refuse to give communion in tongue .but I refuse to take it in hands and then they agree with me.
Not giving in to the evil practice, gives great reverence to GOD.
If one ralizes his/her unworthiness before The August God in Heaven, he/she will naturally be conscious of his unworthiness in receiving The Bread of The Angels by hand..
I have been most at peace & oftentimes ecstatic after I receive Jesus directly from the consecrated hands of the Priest celebrating Mass or his lay ministers..🙏💖
I agree receiving Our Precious Saviour on the tongue should have never been changed. We were made for God, and not God for us. So abide by the Holy Magesterium of The Church and not change things to accommodate man. Reverence and Respect first. Precious Jesus Forgive Them For They Do Not Know What They Do!
During corona time, our Catholic Church, that is Our Holy Pope permitted to give Our Eucharist Lord Jesus Christ in the hands of faithful . As the corona spreading throughout the world, got an end, still our Eucharist Lord is given in the hands of the faithful. In our some of the Churches, our Eucharist Lord is given on the tongues of the faithful. Our Holy Pope has to be requested by all the Archbishops and Bishops throughout the world to permit the Catholic Churches to give our Eucharist Lord Jesus on the tongues of the faithful. Please take my comment to the knowledge of the Archbishops and Bishops. Thanks.
@@dhanabalan4944 When a R. Catholic takes communion during the mass, which aspect of Jesus' body does he believe he is eating?
1. His broken, bruised, bleeding, crucified body before God pours out His wrath on Jesus?
2. His body which has become sin for us and on which God is pouring out His full fury and wrath?
3. His resurrected and glorified body?
The mind of a R. Catholic knows that it is idiocy to believe that he can physically eat Jesus (God is spirit and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth John 4:24) so he must use religious sounding phrases eg , "most blessed sacrament", "holy sacrifice of the mass", "liturgy of the eucharist", "transubstantiation" etc to quell his logical and common sense objections.
The John Chpt. 6 passages where Jesus spoke of "eating His flesh and drinking His blood" are unrelated to the Passover as it was not the time of Passover and it was not in Jerusalem. He was teaching in the synagogue in Capernaum and was speaking of "COMING to Him and BELIEVING on Him" (John 6:35). He was referring to His Word, for he is the Word of God (John 1:1 & Rev. 19:13). We are to "eat" and "drink" His Word.
Heb.10: 12 tells us "but He, having offered one sacrifice for sins for all time, sat down at the right hand of God", where He is remaining until He returns to gather His bride. (He is not coming up and down from heaven in wafers and wine at the whim of sinful deluded "priests").
One "eats" God's Word by believing it and meditating upon it:
Isaiah 51:16 "I (the Lord) have put my words in your mouth ...".
Ezekiel 3:1 "... eat this scroll and go and speak to the House of Israel".
Jeremiah 15:16 "Your words were found and I did eat them ..."
Revelation 10:10 " I (John) took the little book out of the angel's hand and ate it".
The serious student of God's Word who loves Jesus and is filled with the Holy Spirit knows that Jesus often spoke in parables and used metaphors e.g. "I am the Door, the Vine, the Good Shepherd". He explained to His disciples that He did this so that those who had "eyes to see" (truly seeking to know the truth) would see but that those whose hearts were hardened (religious) would not be able to see beyond the literal words.
R. Catholics have been duped by satan through their religion. "God our Savior desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the Truth" (1 Tim 2:4).
"Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears My voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and will dine with him, and he with Me" Rev. 3:20. What is the new spiritually regenerated believer going to dine on with the Lord? - His Word, the Truth.
I receive on the tongue, as does my convert husband. I notice, in my out of town travels, that some pastors and extraordinary ministers appear upset when I open my mouth to receive. But, I have also seen more parishes that bring out kneelers during communion. we need to bring the altar rail back!
Amen❤
I am towards Latin Mass. And Latin Rite .
But I fell in love with a priest-modern rite -who asked all of us to kneel down to a rail and receive Jesus from it .
I was awestruck and amazed .
I’m a Latin mass goer and that very priest is blessed . 💎
Amen to him and all the parishioners .
I’m just a little walker from no where
Communion by mouth. Amen
@@anastasiacheah4000 And when people receive the Eucharist in their hand, they receive by mouth also.
We should all approach the Lord with complete reverence and humility!! Amen
Hope n pray ibalik na sa lahat ng simbahan ang pag communion by tongue,
🙏 Amen
The mother of God is always right. We catholics are suppose to receive Jesus Christ directly through ou mouth from the hands of the priest, for honor, respect and love of God.
ONLY The CONSECRATED HANDS of The PRIEST should TOUCH The BODY, BLOOD, SOUL & DIVINITY of OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST! 🙏✝️🕊️
This is true…. from Heaven !
Excuse me, but have you studied the History of the Church? For the first several hundred years of the Church, Holy Communion was received in the hand.
When I hear people complaining about filthy hands touching Our Lord, I think what makes your tongue more worthy to receive Him? How many grievous sins are committed using the tongue? How many lies? How many hateful words, gossip, slanders, and blasphemies?
Please act according to your conscience, but don’t disparage those who prefer to receive the Holy Eucharist as did the Apostles and the Early Church. Thanks!
Our Lord told us what he wanted.
@@christinepierorazio8108My assumption is that the Eastern Orthodox do not normally receive in the hand. Why do Catholics break ranks ? Communion in the hand, sure does separate the sheep, making it easy for God to Judge us. We judge ourselves, by our inability to know the will of God. God sent Jesus to be rejected by men and then sends Mary to be rejected and spat upon as well. The Rabbis rejected Jesus, the Catholics and Christians reject Mary. Some of the Muslims will be saved, because they accept Mary. Amen
@@Joseph-es6muJesus gave us a labyrinth to figure out and few will find the narrow gate. Amen
I too receive Jesus in my mouth and I prefer to receive from Consecrated hands of Priest. In my Church both ways are allowed but I hope and pray that receiving Jesus in the mouth will be the only way. Only Jesus can do this. Lord I pray for unending vocations to Priesthood. Amen.
After Covid 19 our priests in Hyderabad INDIA are not giving the Holy Communion on the tongue. We feel very sad about it.
Rather than be sad, rejoice that you are able to receive at all. We have brothers and sisters in Christ in some areas of the world who have no opportunity to receive at all.
I'm a Catholic by birth and went to Catholic schools, I've only seen communion given by the priest into the mouth. I pray I've an encounter with mother of my redeemer in His glorious name!Jesus Christ!!
Consecrated sacred communion to be received on the tongue for faithfuls. In Singapore, options for Holy communion on the hand, and the tongue. God bless us All ❤ AMEN
I wish all our churches would only give Our Dear Lord only on the tongue it hurts me so much to see people putting Our Lord in the hands so many of the parishes are going against Our Lords teaching and even the way people dress and that Priest are not even giving out Our Lord to the Parishioners instead they have the sacramental ministers giving out Our Lord while the Priest sits and watches. I also notice how people are so loud and they don't care that Our Lord is present in the Tabernacle of the church I see also have people come and go like it's an auditorium and that this clapping is getting ridiculous to I mean if you do things as a volunteer and you should want to not be acknowledged and to be given that Grace in heaven and not be always clap being in appreciate it here on Earth I also have noticed that not only is it that these people also too that are the musicians they like to just play music constantly even during time of when you're trying to pray and after you've received our Lord and have that time of peace and to be in the presence of God at that time after communion, to have just peacefulness but instead there's just people taking and music playing which it can be very distracting after you have received communion and you want to spend a few moments with Our Lord and to thank him. We should get back to saying the St Michael prayer and to give thank to God for being able to be at church and being able to receive Our Lord i think in these times we should be saying a decade of the rosary after every mass as well
When a R. Catholic takes communion during the mass, which aspect of Jesus' body does he believe he is eating?
1. His broken, bruised, bleeding, crucified body before God pours out His wrath on Jesus?
2. His body which has become sin for us and on which God is pouring out His full fury and wrath?
3. His resurrected and glorified body?
The mind of a R. Catholic knows that it is idiocy to believe that he can physically eat Jesus (God is spirit and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth John 4:24) so he must use religious sounding phrases eg , "most blessed sacrament", "holy sacrifice of the mass", "liturgy of the eucharist", "transubstantiation" etc to quell his logical and common sense objections.
The John Chpt. 6 passages where Jesus spoke of "eating His flesh and drinking His blood" are unrelated to the Passover as it was not the time of Passover and it was not in Jerusalem. He was teaching in the synagogue in Capernaum and was speaking of "COMING to Him and BELIEVING on Him" (John 6:35). He was referring to His Word, for he is the Word of God (John 1:1 & Rev. 19:13). We are to "eat" and "drink" His Word.
Heb.10: 12 tells us "but He, having offered one sacrifice for sins for all time, sat down at the right hand of God", where He is remaining until He returns to gather His bride. (He is not coming up and down from heaven in wafers and wine at the whim of sinful deluded "priests").
One "eats" God's Word by believing it and meditating upon it:
Isaiah 51:16 "I (the Lord) have put my words in your mouth ...".
Ezekiel 3:1 "... eat this scroll and go and speak to the House of Israel".
Jeremiah 15:16 "Your words were found and I did eat them ..."
Revelation 10:10 " I (John) took the little book out of the angel's hand and ate it".
The serious student of God's Word who loves Jesus and is filled with the Holy Spirit knows that Jesus often spoke in parables and used metaphors e.g. "I am the Door, the Vine, the Good Shepherd". He explained to His disciples that He did this so that those who had "eyes to see" (truly seeking to know the truth) would see but that those whose hearts were hardened (religious) would not be able to see beyond the literal words.
R. Catholics have been duped by satan through their religion. "God our Savior desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the Truth" (1 Tim 2:4).
"Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears My voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and will dine with him, and he with Me" Rev. 3:20. What is the new spiritually regenerated believer going to dine on with the Lord? - His Word, the Truth.
@@mitchellosmer1293if you really want truth research early church fathers those educated by the apostles or who the apostles trained and you will know real truth about the Eucharist. And note in John 6 how Jesus when He said what He said people didn’t like His words and walked away. Did He tell them come back I only meant literally? No He let them go because The Eucharist really is His body and blood. So Holy. Why satanists steal our host but don’t care one tittle about any other so called churches and what they give as whatever (bread or grape juice?). Even the devils know it’s real and bring people with false teaching to stop people going to catholic mass and receiving the Eucharist. The devil wants souls and fools many. Do you really want truth? Most really don’t. They want comfort false religions. I pray for you.
I feel the same way.
It hurts my heart.
I even talked to my priest & although he did mention some of my concerns in his homily, I feel he doesn't think it's a big problem. The 2 priests in my parish are young. ...42 & 36.
Don't get me started on the E. M's. This whole thing is unsettling.
I feel that only Consecrated hands should handle the Holy Host.👍👍👍
Feelings are a poor means of deetermining a discipline; the Church, after consideration, expanded the discipline of the means of reception. It constantly amazes me how many people feel (which is what this is about) theat they know better than the Popes and the bishops of the world.
❤❤🙏🙏
Our parish priest at Divine Mercy Baguio City, Philippines, administers Holy Communion by mouth. We kneel to receive communion.
It has made a great impact on us and for me personally, it was going back to what I was taught as the right way to receive the holy communion as a child.
PRAY, PRAY, PRAY FOR THE TRUE CATHOLIC CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST !!!
When a R. Catholic takes communion during the mass, which aspect of Jesus' body does he believe he is eating?
1. His broken, bruised, bleeding, crucified body before God pours out His wrath on Jesus?
2. His body which has become sin for us and on which God is pouring out His full fury and wrath?
3. His resurrected and glorified body?
The mind of a R. Catholic knows that it is idiocy to believe that he can physically eat Jesus (God is spirit and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth John 4:24) so he must use religious sounding phrases eg , "most blessed sacrament", "holy sacrifice of the mass", "liturgy of the eucharist", "transubstantiation" etc to quell his logical and common sense objections.
The John Chpt. 6 passages where Jesus spoke of "eating His flesh and drinking His blood" are unrelated to the Passover as it was not the time of Passover and it was not in Jerusalem. He was teaching in the synagogue in Capernaum and was speaking of "COMING to Him and BELIEVING on Him" (John 6:35). He was referring to His Word, for he is the Word of God (John 1:1 & Rev. 19:13). We are to "eat" and "drink" His Word.
Heb.10: 12 tells us "but He, having offered one sacrifice for sins for all time, sat down at the right hand of God", where He is remaining until He returns to gather His bride. (He is not coming up and down from heaven in wafers and wine at the whim of sinful deluded "priests").
One "eats" God's Word by believing it and meditating upon it:
Isaiah 51:16 "I (the Lord) have put my words in your mouth ...".
Ezekiel 3:1 "... eat this scroll and go and speak to the House of Israel".
Jeremiah 15:16 "Your words were found and I did eat them ..."
Revelation 10:10 " I (John) took the little book out of the angel's hand and ate it".
The serious student of God's Word who loves Jesus and is filled with the Holy Spirit knows that Jesus often spoke in parables and used metaphors e.g. "I am the Door, the Vine, the Good Shepherd". He explained to His disciples that He did this so that those who had "eyes to see" (truly seeking to know the truth) would see but that those whose hearts were hardened (religious) would not be able to see beyond the literal words.
R. Catholics have been duped by satan through their religion. "God our Savior desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the Truth" (1 Tim 2:4).
"Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears My voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and will dine with him, and he with Me" Rev. 3:20. What is the new spiritually regenerated believer going to dine on with the Lord? - His Word, the Truth
------quote---.PRAY, PRAY, PRAY FOR THE TRUE CATHOLIC CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST !!!.. unquote
QUOTE that FROM the Bible!!!!!!
@@mitchellosmer1293 Your ignorance of the writings of the early Fathers of the Church is showing. So also is your knowledge of koine Greek; if you coud actually read that you would understand that in John 6, Christ was very graphic when He said that one needed to gnaw on His flesh; and HE DID NOT BOTHER TO SAY "hey, it was just a parable, a metaphore. In fact, He let many leave Him at that point, and even turned to the apostles and asked them if they were going to leave also. in short, He meant just what he said.
To answer questions 1 - 3, we beleive we receive Christ, Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity in the Eucharist - and that whether it is uder the species of bread (the Host) or the species of wine. And while we are at it, please explain the more than 50 Eucharistic miracles where hosts have, through the power of God, turned into actual flesh - and recent miracles show heart tissue which was under extreme stress; the scientists who have examined it can't explain it.
But they don't call it a metaphore. And you want to call John 6: 53 a metaphore - but Christ says you shall have no life within you if you don't. Might be time to ask the Holy Spirit for wisdom.
Receiving Communion in mouth is respectful and used to be since childhood🙏
Please everyone please pray that the effect of Grace of the flame of love of our immaculate heart ❤of Mary be spread all over humanity,so it may blind Satan 🙏💕🙏
Having been brought through the 1950's to the 1970's as a traditional Catholic, it would have been unthinkable to venture beyond the altar rails let alone to touch the precious species. Kneeling at the altar rail would make reception in the hand unfeasible. I find it hard to comprehend how swiftly and successful the forces of evil have been in accomplishing this gross disrespect of the Body of Our Lord and Saviour by standing and sticking out the paw as the demon said during the exorcism of Annaliese Michel in the early 70's.
Beautiful message, yet catholics don't get it. MAY God bless you.
When a R. Catholic takes communion during the mass, which aspect of Jesus' body does he believe he is eating?
1. His broken, bruised, bleeding, crucified body before God pours out His wrath on Jesus?
2. His body which has become sin for us and on which God is pouring out His full fury and wrath?
3. His resurrected and glorified body?
The mind of a R. Catholic knows that it is idiocy to believe that he can physically eat Jesus (God is spirit and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth John 4:24) so he must use religious sounding phrases eg , "most blessed sacrament", "holy sacrifice of the mass", "liturgy of the eucharist", "transubstantiation" etc to quell his logical and common sense objections.
The John Chpt. 6 passages where Jesus spoke of "eating His flesh and drinking His blood" are unrelated to the Passover as it was not the time of Passover and it was not in Jerusalem. He was teaching in the synagogue in Capernaum and was speaking of "COMING to Him and BELIEVING on Him" (John 6:35). He was referring to His Word, for he is the Word of God (John 1:1 & Rev. 19:13). We are to "eat" and "drink" His Word.
Heb.10: 12 tells us "but He, having offered one sacrifice for sins for all time, sat down at the right hand of God", where He is remaining until He returns to gather His bride. (He is not coming up and down from heaven in wafers and wine at the whim of sinful deluded "priests").
One "eats" God's Word by believing it and meditating upon it:
Isaiah 51:16 "I (the Lord) have put my words in your mouth ...".
Ezekiel 3:1 "... eat this scroll and go and speak to the House of Israel".
Jeremiah 15:16 "Your words were found and I did eat them ..."
Revelation 10:10 " I (John) took the little book out of the angel's hand and ate it".
The serious student of God's Word who loves Jesus and is filled with the Holy Spirit knows that Jesus often spoke in parables and used metaphors e.g. "I am the Door, the Vine, the Good Shepherd". He explained to His disciples that He did this so that those who had "eyes to see" (truly seeking to know the truth) would see but that those whose hearts were hardened (religious) would not be able to see beyond the literal words.
R. Catholics have been duped by satan through their religion. "God our Savior desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the Truth" (1 Tim 2:4).
"Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears My voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and will dine with him, and he with Me" Rev. 3:20. What is the new spiritually regenerated believer going to dine on with the Lord? - His Word, the Truth.
That "gross disrespect" was how the Church, both east and west, received, for the first 800 yea;rs. One has to be amazed at the amount of spiritual pride some people have. A parish I was in for about 30 years was one in which the vast majority received in the hand; it was also one that had Perpetual Adoration for the better part of those 30 years; and which produced 3 men discerning a vocation to the priesthood (one finally orained), two permanent deacons, and two women professed to reigious orders.
@@timmoore9736 I don't know where you plucked this first 800 years from. To my knowledge communion in the hand was allowed for a brief period in the 4th/5th century but was discontinued due to the abuse it incurred. Even then the Host was not placed directly in the hand but on a piece of cloth covering the hand and from there to the mouth, thereby negating the touching of the precious species. The post Vatican II modernists managed through disobedience and in an effort of false ecumenism with protestants forced the hand of Paul VI. From there the practice spread like a cancer through the Church. If you care to look up the happening at Garabandal in the early 1960's when the Blessed Virgin appeared to a group of children over a 3 year period. As the village was remote the priest wasn't always available to say mass. One Sunday an angel appeared to one of the children who kneeling down received the Communion host on the tongue from the angel. A Spanish photographer was on hand to record the event but didn't know what transpired until he developed and printed the photo.
@@sklenars I have actually studied the history of the Church - which you apparently haven't. it was not "plucked". Oh, and by the way, the Church has never approved Garabandal, so your reliance on it is abit askew. But then... Oh - and Pope Paul VI was such a wus, he just got pushed every which way by those "modernists". well, you do hav;e all the snotty terms down. And it was not disobedience. The bishop is the final authority within his diocese as to liturgical law when there is no specific to the contrary - a point that the "conservatives" ignore, calling them disobedient. I would hope that the next comment will not be approval of the SSPX - Cardinal Kasper publicly said that they are de facto separated from the Church, but not de jure, due to the desire of the Church for recncilliation. And Rome never repudiated his statement; given that he had been head of the dicastery after Pope Benedict was no longer head of it, it carries more weight. As to the 4th/5th century, that ws practiced in part but it was the comment of Saint Cyril of Jerusalem attesting to this noble practice. Around 400 St. Cyril writes: "When you approach, do not extend your hands with palms upward and fingers apart, but make your left hand a throne for your right hand, since the latter is to receive the King." Eventually the Church did move to Communion on the tongue. And one last comment: people in this thread want to bleet about the "consecrated hanbds of the priest". But in the 1917 code co Canon law, a deacon could also distribute Communion, and his hands were not consecrated. QED
We can decide on everything. More more people are receiving it on the tongue in ourarea in our area.
I believe that we should receive the Holy Eucharist on our tongue. Our pastor is neutral about this which bothers me.
When a R. Catholic takes communion during the mass, which aspect of Jesus' body does he believe he is eating?
1. His broken, bruised, bleeding, crucified body before God pours out His wrath on Jesus?
2. His body which has become sin for us and on which God is pouring out His full fury and wrath?
3. His resurrected and glorified body?
The mind of a R. Catholic knows that it is idiocy to believe that he can physically eat Jesus (God is spirit and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth John 4:24) so he must use religious sounding phrases eg , "most blessed sacrament", "holy sacrifice of the mass", "liturgy of the eucharist", "transubstantiation" etc to quell his logical and common sense objections.
The John Chpt. 6 passages where Jesus spoke of "eating His flesh and drinking His blood" are unrelated to the Passover as it was not the time of Passover and it was not in Jerusalem. He was teaching in the synagogue in Capernaum and was speaking of "COMING to Him and BELIEVING on Him" (John 6:35). He was referring to His Word, for he is the Word of God (John 1:1 & Rev. 19:13). We are to "eat" and "drink" His Word.
Heb.10: 12 tells us "but He, having offered one sacrifice for sins for all time, sat down at the right hand of God", where He is remaining until He returns to gather His bride. (He is not coming up and down from heaven in wafers and wine at the whim of sinful deluded "priests").
One "eats" God's Word by believing it and meditating upon it:
Isaiah 51:16 "I (the Lord) have put my words in your mouth ...".
Ezekiel 3:1 "... eat this scroll and go and speak to the House of Israel".
Jeremiah 15:16 "Your words were found and I did eat them ..."
Revelation 10:10 " I (John) took the little book out of the angel's hand and ate it".
The serious student of God's Word who loves Jesus and is filled with the Holy Spirit knows that Jesus often spoke in parables and used metaphors e.g. "I am the Door, the Vine, the Good Shepherd". He explained to His disciples that He did this so that those who had "eyes to see" (truly seeking to know the truth) would see but that those whose hearts were hardened (religious) would not be able to see beyond the literal words.
R. Catholics have been duped by satan through their religion. "God our Savior desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the Truth" (1 Tim 2:4).
"Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears My voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and will dine with him, and he with Me" Rev. 3:20. What is the new spiritually regenerated believer going to dine on with the Lord? - His Word, the Truth.
@@mitchellosmer1293 Why are you writing a book?
Our parish priest in Mabolo Church CEBU Philippine continuously invite everyone to receive the host through the mouth and kneeling of one knee.
That's what OUR BLESSED VIRGIN MARY ask us to do
@@Maya-uv7vk Actually, the Church has never said that Mary has said such - purportedly some visionary or another has said that, but such comments have never been approved; and given the history of the early Church, it is somewhere between likely and extrelmely likely that Mary received in the hand. For 800 year, both East and West received that way.
@@timmoore9736 ???, are you a Catholic Romain ?
Communion in the hand was the common practice of the Church - both East and West - for the first 800 years. As noted by Cyril of Jerusalem: "Coming up to receive, therefore, do not approach with your wrists extended or your fingers splayed, but making your left hand a throne for the right (for it is about to receive a King) and cupping your palm, so receive the Body of Christ; and answer: “Amen.” Noted by multiple Catholic writers of the time: Tertullian,[1] Cyprian,[2] Augustine,[3] Cyril of Alexandria,[4] and John Climacus.[5] In Jerusalem, we have the mystagogical catecheses of Cyril of Jerusalem (or perhaps of his successor, John).[6] In Syria (what we now call Turkey and surrounding regions) it is witnessed by Basil the Great,[7] John Chrysostom,[8] Theodore of Mopsuestia,[9] John Damascene[10] and the Council of Constantinople in Trullo (also called the Quinisext council).[11] In East Syria (what we would now call the Middle East) we have evidence from Ephrem the Syrian[12] and Narsai.[13] In the far-flung regions of the empire-Gaul (modern-day France and Spain) we have the witness of Caesarius of Arles[14] and the council of Auxerre,[15] and in England, we have the Venerable Bede.[16] Liturgical evidence from Rome is always sparser than one would like, but Eusebius preserves a mention of communion in the hand in a letter written from Dionysius of Alexandria to Sixtus I, bishop of Rome,[17] and in a letter of Cornelius, bishop of Rome.[18] Moreover, an early illuminated gospel, the Rosanno Gospels, depicts the last supper as a communion line, where the disciples receive in cupped hands while bowed. Private revelations are just that; and the Church does not pass judgement on the entirety of any message nor does it even require acceptance by the faithful. We would all be advised to keep our personal opinions to ourselve on matters which the Church provides alternatives.
The Council of Trent said, " you shall receive on the tongue. " The Council of Trent was called to address the challenges of the Protestant Deformers, and for 500 years the Catholic Church has had great Pope's and successes. Along comes Vatican 2 and countless failures and confusion. The sheep are being separated prior to the coming End Times. Amen
@@CharlesDayon The Council made a disciplinary rule, and like most disciplinary rules, it is subject to change, In case you did not notice from your statement, the Council was some 500 years ago and the rule was appropriate for the time. The Church has seen fit to modify the discipline of how one is to receive, and in the hand is allowed now as well as on the tongue. and you are most welcome to choose which means you receive, but you are not welcome to judge how others receive when the Church has allowed an alternate means,. Further, in the hand goes back to the first 800 years of the Church and with the multitude of saints from that time, it did not appear to be a bad or incorrect way of receiving. Your implication that reception in the hand is the cause of the problems the Church has been having is beyond myopic, as well as falling into the logical fallacy of post hoc, ergo propter hoc.
@@timmoore9736 this is a discussion and not about judging anybody .
of course if the cap fits ...wear it
800 years ago the women dressed in long robes and covered their heads
now they come as if going to the beach or worse.
The Holy Mass was not said in multi languages
no lay person was allowed on the altar etc
So why don't we adopt all those practices too ?!
Our parish Priest prefers we receive Holy Communion in the mouth but will not refuse giving Holy Communion on the hand. I prefer to receive Holy Eucharistic in my mouth and on my knees!
Father Larry my Priest at St Aloysius the church I attend has left it up to the Parishioners!! As for me I receive in my hand but I will no longer practice that ritual I will now receive communion in KY mouth, Thank you for sharing this BEAUTIFUL Story.. God Bless
😮Definitely, on the tongue. We should've received Jesus Cris through the tonge. Amen
These are the Last Days, people are worrying about rituals rather than making imprvement and coming closer to Jesus IN THEIR HEARTS.
Thank God! it will soon be over.
What will be over? We are not to be glad for the End Days. The End Days will be horrible for all mankind.
@@AlbertHess-xy7ky
Mary told me that she was very sad that her Divine Son is abused and neglected in the Blessed Sacrament. I told Mary that we need to return to having altar rails, kneeling, receiving Holy Communion on tongue from priest, altar boy holding gold paten underneath to catch any fragments of the Sacred Host. Mary answered yes, those things must be brought back! I agreed.
Your right but the problem is the other priest refuse it to receive the Holy Host in the tongue so we receive it in the hand. Pray for the priest.😢
My sister and I always receive the Lord on our tongues. I hardly see ever see others do so. There is only the priest celebrant, and Eucharistic ministers who distribute Communion to people in line. Not kneeling before the altar rail.
I Love so much catholic Christian please mother Mary pray for me and pray for my daughter clear and Anita and Rose also
You are asking what we think.
God was the same yesterday ,today, and forever. God can be modern or mass. In the church and in the world, everything is upside down.
I am 60+ years old. I grew up in Lithuania. Grew up in the Catholic family. This time was occupation Russians. But we went to the church, and we had all the sacraments . Mum was strict . I and my sister never used Lenin sign , and never was pioneers. She always remained us ,you can serve one God Jesus Christ. I am really thankful my mummy for that.
And comuninion just on the tongue. Our arms are not worthy. Take Jesus in the arms. I am feel always sad in church. My opinion is better do not take at all.
I pray for priests, pastors, and pope.
Pope St Paul 2nd was in earth Saint . Hi was shining from inside.
God knows everything ,He control everything. For now Jesus Christ is mercifull, but not for long.
God please bless your faithfull people 🙏
I love to recall the days when we used to receive the Sacred Host by the tongue. My granddaughter will soon have her First Communion. It’s sad to see children, especially first communicants receiving Jesus by the hand. Before, first communion was such a great event in our lives. We were taught to kneel and receive Jesus reverently.
And I recall how fast the Priest used to give Communion out in the late 1950s and early 1960s - I was an altar boy at the time, and if we did not peddal ourselves backweard fast enough to suit him, he would give us a clear nudge. Whether one receives on the tongue or in the hand does not bother me in the least, but I often reflect how approaching individually and receiveing slows things down and is far more reverent than it was back then. I have rev=ceived at a parish where they still have the altar rail, and my observation is that the priest is hurrying there too.
Our Pastor at St Clare, Essex MARYland give us Communion on the tongue and kneeling if we are able! We were suppose to close. And again they want to close the Church, but we are still standing at this time.🌹🙏💕😇
The Holy Eucharist should be received on the tongue with great veneration for The Body and Blood of Christ is Sacred and healing to the Soul and Body Amen ❤
Thank you for this great message and for me it has always been against my conscience to touch the Lord of heaven and earth on my non-concencrated hands worse still . I feel the Agonizing Jesus Christ deserves all the reverence we can possibly give Him. I personally have resolved to receive Holy Communion on the tongue on my knees. I pray fervently that our Bishops and PRIESTS take this matter seriously including that of the extra ordinary ministers distributing Holy Communion with their non CONSENCRATED hands. MAY THE AGONISING JESUS CHRIST INTERVENE IN THIS VERY SAD SITUATION. AGONISING JESUS CHRIST BEAR IT LORD
AGONISING JESUS CHRIST WE LOVE YOU
AGONISING JESUS CHRIST YOUR KINGDOM COME AMEN ❤❤
Holy Communion should always be received on the tongue,out of love and respect for the Lord. Also tiny fragments may sometimes break off so Jesus is being walked on each day. When receiving on the hand people should at least put the Sacred Host into their mouth before they turn around. Just take one step to the side of the Priest so He can continue. People were never taught how to received on the hand with respect. They never check to see if a fragment has fallen off. It often happens because I experienced this in the past. Viva Cristo Rey
Why is the tongue better than the hand? Both are God's creation!
Because there is less chance of a piece of the Precious Body bringing broken off and falling to the floor. That was my instruction when I converted to The Catholic Church in 1989…..and again as I have assisted with RCIA for over 22 years and 20 + years of being an Extraordinary Minister of the Holy Eucharist. And also I assist with Confirmation instruction. Also it was only in 1969 this was changed to have an option.🙏🏻❣️
Mother Mary loves all here children she will not interfere with her son work❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ 0:20
At the Last Supper Jesus said "take and eat" and He shared the bread, He did not place it on their tongues.
Please mother Mary pray for my family and pray for my husband is sick Amen
I prefer in the mouth but everyone receives on the hand
You dirty brute
And that should be perfectly acceptable, as Rome has approved of both means of reception.
Thank you for sharing this video, I didn't know that we should received our communion in our mouth NOT in our hands. I just remembered when I received my first communion when I was 9 years old way back in 1972, I received the Body of Christ in my mouth. I start receiving the Body of Christ in my hands, that was 1994. Now through this video, I will be receiving the Body of Christ in my mouth. NO more touchy, touchy the Body of Christ. Thanks again for sharing this video.
How can you be so God Damn ignorant?
The Church has never endorsed what the visionary is alleged to have said that Mary is alleged to have said. The Church is final arbiter of the matter, and the Chjurch has not spoken. And I find it hard to believe Mary said anything about it, as it is extremely likely she received in the hand - as did everyone else in both the Eastern and the Western church for 800 years.
in philippines in cebuphil. i recieve the communion in toungh but the priest of saint Joseph tabunok cebu give me in hand im very sad of that priest in tabunok talidsy from that on i did not go to that church only in Sto nino mohon because he did not refuse me to give communion in toungh im happy very much because for me im not worthy to recieve it Praise the LordGod bless that priest. Amen!
I liked snd subscribed this channel. I am sharing this now to Fb/messenger page. God bless!
As I listened to this explanation of this event for the second time. I pray for those who will also listen to this presentation. My thoughts are those of a cradle Catholic. I’m inspired by the message of Jesus ( The Christ ). We on earth are the product of God’s creation. Jesus came to us to save us not destroy or punish us. At the last supper, Jesus was gave us the opportunity to choose to be with Him through His gift of grace. Please consider that God is Love and accept His Love without fear. God truly is our creator not our destroyer. Seek the path to eternal life, receive Holy Communion often with respect and thanksgiving for the grace Jesus has offered us in Love. It is not a symbol, we should not be afraid to approach God and allow Him to enter the body He has created. Respect is what is important. Approached the Eucharist with Love in your heart. God will love you back. 🙏 Amen
Thank you for a post which respects the alternatives which Rome allows.
ST. AUGUSTINE: “Apart from those moments when the Scriptures are being read or a sermon is preached, when the bishop is praying aloud or the deacon is specifying the intentions of the community, is there a time when the faithful assembled in the church are not singing? Truly, I see nothing better, or more useful, or more holy that they could do.”
I have followed the Church's guidelines regarding the reception of Communion, and now it's allowed in the hand. However, after seeing now how many no longer believe in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist, I believe much is because Communion in the hand is treating the host as something normal like food, and no longer seeing it as Christ himself, so I plan on going back to receiving on the tongue (or in the mouth). Thank you for sharing this here!
I agree!
In our church, you can receive communion either way.
The priest here in Butuan City giving us Holy Communion in the hands I wish to receive Holy Communion in the mouth ❤❤❤❤❤
You’re lucky you can receive on your hand. Some places don’t have that privilege.
@@TheHiducky Indeed, some places, no one can receive as Mass is outlawed.
Our Parish has two kneelers in the front for those who want to receive on their knees on the tongue
I’ve always felt that taking the Eucharist in the hand wasn’t as I learned as a child. I’ve had a priest refuse to put it on my tongue. I finally took it in my hand.
I will receive on my tongue from now on.
1:08
The priest was wrong in that - just as a priest was clearly upset when someone put forth their hand. Roma locuta est, causa finita est. (St Augustine).
Most of our priests prefer to give communion by hand, but we have a young Priest who definitely prefers to give Communion in the Mouth, but doesn't openly promote it. When I was the Eucharistic Minister with him, before mass started I told him that I would today receive it in the hand. He became very defensive and told me that it wasn't illegal to receive the Blessed Sacrament in the Mouth, so I gained a little courage and received it by mouth. It probably hasn't got anything to do with it but I haven't been put on the roster to be Eucharist Minister since. I was 20 years old when it changed and I still don't feel the reverence I felt then when we knelt down and received it on the tongue, leaving it to it dissolved and in complete prayer and Adoration, feeling His Love within. 🙏
People in the Catholic church don't want reverence, apparently it bothers their conscience. This is a big problem in America . Amen
@@CharlesDayonplease don’t be so judgmental. The Holy Spirit is so happy when you nourish with reverence, no matter how you receive Him.
So thankful after covid our parish priest allow receiving the Holy Eucharist on the tongue. But still their is some rcving on the hands😢 & the painful thing i notice after rcving Holy Eucharist they talk💔 seems just a normal bread😢💔 🙏🙏🙏
That is an issue of catechesis, not an issue of how one receives. Rome has given permission to receive in the hand; and for the first 800 year, that is how the Church received.
Nowadays,almost all Priest are giving Holy Communion by hand, so I prefer receiving it Spiritually.
I receive Communion in the mouth. We are allowed to receive in the hand. Communion is distributed by the Priest and Deacons and trained male and female parishioners. I am in my 70’s and there aren’t kneeler available so I stand to receive Holy Communion. I would rather have kneelers available.
AMEN ,PRAISE THE LORD JESUS CHRIST, HAIL MARY
Remember the Day of your baptism; Prophet, priest and king👑.
After your baptism he who appear as a little child is worthy to touch and receive our LORD JESUS CHRIST 🤲🙌🧎♂️👼🕊
I am a lay minister and I asked you who is worthy to touch him now you tell me who is worthy to touch him, receiving in the hand is wrong when you start losing your respect for Jesus you are on the edge of losing your faith, please STOP receiving in the Hand
what to prepare before receiving holy communion your tongue or heart so don't just make assumptions that aren't true the reason I experienced healing while receiving holy communion was not because of the tongue because the intention of my heart wanted to be healed so I received it with my hands because I understand what it means to receive holy communion in the hand the term dirty hands is sinful it's no different than your tongue do not receive communion in tongues outside the church saying bad things about others is very difficult to clean up
im a extraordinary minister That's why I understand so the preparation before receiving holy communion is our heart to receive the body and blood in the eucharist receiving communion on the tongue or hands is valid, do not arbitrarily say "stop"I, as an extraordinary minister, also have no right to stop receiving communion on the tongue or hands Be careful with your argument
To you'll clarification what message was given to the children in Fatima and what St. Thomas Aquinas said about Eucharist who can touch it.
@@anthonyduarte4029 not everyone understands that because of the real statement (do you really want to accept Jesus in the Eucharist or through conditions that only follow your own heart) and not what is the intention of your heart to accept Jesus in eucharist
@@anthonyduarte4029 and indeed only a priest or bishop is qualified to touch it but if there is an appointment for an extraordinary minister there is a special prayer for them before give holy communion to the faithful and not randomly for Europe or America or other western countries, there is no appointment of extraordinary ministers and very sad because of lack of catechesis we pray for America and European catholic /christian countries can grow and learn more about faith because it is getting worse we in asia every month we study catechesis and liturgy
I would always like to receive the Holy Communion on the tongue.🙏🙏🙏
And you should be most welcome to do so - no one should require you to change or disparage your choice.. But what is granted to you should be granted to others as to the other allowed means of reception.
Receiving in the hand has been proven crumbs fall to the floor. Then trampled on and vacuumed and sent to trash. Can this please God. I don’t want to walk in churches where this is done. So sad. 🛐
Go to traditional Latin holy mass and only received the Eucharist on my knees and on the tongue
For some time now i receive the host on the tonge .eversinds medetating more about the meaning of myLord Jesus in my live i felt the urge to receive Him in my mouth .up till now i ve been served as i prefere
(Diocese Paramaribo - Suriname
At baptism our tongues are anointed/consecrated by the Priest, preparing us to receive Holy Communion on the tongue.
Out of extreme adoration it is proper for the laity to receive Jesus on the tongue, this also prevents the particles of the Holy Eucharist from being all over the place, more particularly from being wiped on our clothes as is done by the recipient very irreverently
Love what you had to say I receive communion on the tongue followed by a drink of water I kneel I sit in the front seat the priest comes to me comes to me and I hope to keep it that way.I do believe Father doesn’t care if you receive holy communion on the tongue or hand but most is hand .we clap if it’s someone’s birthday anniversary before the final blessing I do not participate
Yes, we have an option right now. My preference is receiving Holy Communion in the mouth by a Catholic priest always. It’s very powerful receiving The Holy Host in my mouth by a Holy Priest while kneeling down on my knees. Alleluia.
I received Communion on my tongue and while kneeling in Florida, 30 years ago, and the Pastor and one assistant Priest always pressed their forefinger into my tongue. Other Priests also did this! How many of you also had this experience? Probably many! The Virgin Mary appeared in Bayside, New York City, said to receive Communion while kneeling, if possible. Amen
And I received Communion from a priest who was laicized after he fled the US - because the police were clsoing in on him for allegedly using a spy camera on children. But it was still Jesus I received.
@@CharlesDayon The Church has rejected the Bayside alleged apparition.
I prefer to receive my Lord God on my tongue by consecrated hand of PRIEST.
I receive only in the mouth at the Traditionl Latin Mass. I don't feel worthy to place my lord Jesus on my unconnected hand. We must remember and believe what occurs during Transubstantiation!
What does Mathew 26:26 say? Mark 14:22? Luke 22:19?
I don’t think God cares whether Holy Communion is received by mouth or hand. He cares how your heart receives Communion.
I agree with you! People are too hung up on legalism, instead of spirit of the law - and He warned us about that in Scripture. Also, Jesus IS NOT UNAPPROACHABLE. After all, did He not visit and talk with the people of His time that were societies' outcasts? So, what is legalism? Legalism is an attempt to gain favor with God or to impress our fellow man by doing certain things (or avoiding other things), without regard to the condition of our hearts before God. At the root of legalism is the sin of pride, because the legalist thinks that he is able to commend himself to God by his own good deeds. Invariably, he is only looking at externals, not at his heart. Also, the legalist’s pride motivates him to exalt himself in the sight of others by his outward behavior, again neglecting to see the corruption of his own heart. Thus legalism denies human depravity and exalts human ability. As such, it is opposed to the gospel of God’s grace. That’s why both Jesus and Paul clashed with the legalists.
If you recall God was very precise how the firstTabernacle was constructed. No modern slip shod construction for God. God expects perfection from us, and will not accept Catholics who think, what goes on in the privacy of the bedroom, is none of the churches business, and similar views. Amen
I believe we should recieve the holy communlon in the tounge Amen
And the Church believes and rules that one may receive either on the tongue or in the hand. Perha;ps we should believe as the Church believes.
Agree on the tongue by a priest only, though due to shortages of Priests nowadays, Eucharistic Ministers are appointed and allowed to give communion but only on the hand ! Lord Jesus Christ please enlighten your faithful people of the rightful predictions of your chosen Christian Community Church thanking you 🙏
Please mother Mary pray for my son Bosco Amen
I always receive by mouth. As long as our parish priest tolerates communion by the mouth i attend mass. Its very hard to talk to priest. What they like is the law.
The modernist Priests are very legalistic and hard hearted. They have tried very hard to fix the Catholic Church and are bitter. We are a bunch of sheep and a few are stubbornly holding to the truth and this makes them angry. Learn to recognize the faces of evil in the Catholic church and in the world. Amen
It shud b direct in tounge only it's body of our Lord AMEN
Rome seems to think otherwise.
In my parish I am the only one who kneels and receives on the tongue. I live in a foreign country and been only going to this parish for 3 years. So it makes me feel very uncomfortable to be the only one receiving this way. However, receiving in the hand is out of the question. Lately I have been genuflecting while in the queue approaching the priest and receiving on the tongue still but standing up. As a compromise to not be holding up the line kneeling and also feeling uncomfortable, almost feeling like turning it into a small spectacle being the only one receiving on the knees
Receiving communion by the mouth means giving of reverence to our REDEEMER more so if we kneel..
That is a pious personal opinion, but not what the Church teaches - it teaches that either way of receiving is acceptable.
AMEN my words were correct.
one of her many names... akita, Lourdes, Fátima, Guadalupe, Immaculate Concepción, Assumption, Lady of sorrows, of Hope, etc.
There are many priests in Australia that are under the direction of their Bishops and are directed to only give communion on the hand. I have been refused many times to have it received on the tongue. I stand my ground and some do give it to me after mass so paritioners do not see. I am so greatful and blessed that my local church only give communion whilst kneeling and on the tongue. Please pray for all priests.
Oh which church do you go to?
When I was young we receive our communication by the tongue, then said can be done by hand, bcz when Jesus divided the bread and give it to his disciples, they all accept it in their hand Jesus did not feed them individually., thats why people start receiving by the hand, we are told no wrong or right. Its really up to the church to do what is right.
I receive in the tongue. During covid we could only in the hand. I was doing a 40hour adoration and a voice saud to me receive me in the tongue I was going to tell my priest what the Lord said to me thw next mass I went to which was a Monday from the pulpit he announced you can now take holy communion on the tongue. Praise God I have always received hoky communion on the tongue.
Wishful dream you had.
A very special priest friend refers Communion on tongue 🙏
I was refused on the tongue by a minister of the Eucharist yesterday- I said gently that my hands have not been consecrated- she just turned on her heels whist saying ‘you may go to the priest’ - 🙏
I receive Holy Communion from a Consecrated hand , Priest, kneeling down and on my tongue.lf the Eucharistic ministers are distributing the Holy Communion ,l pray the prayers of Spiritual Communion.
Why would you receive from a Extraordinarily Eucharistic minster anyway? Especially a woman. Does the Catholic Church require woman to step aside from that ministry if is their period? We maybe should change that part of the Bible so as not to offend the ladies.Amen
I firmly believe that we should only receive in the mouth.
And the Church firmly believes that you and others should have a choice - and the Church approves of both choiices.
The teachings of God should not be changed.My grandma and mom are devout catholic and we grow up as a catholic. Communion in the tongue is a must bcoz it is sacred and lay ministers should not be allowed to touch it. Only the preist because they are concecrated. With respect and reverence to the Holy one.
The teaching of God, as in the Gospels, says "Take" , not "open wide and receive". Further, there are now 5 Popes who have said that reception in the hand is permitted. And in the 1917 Code of Canon Law, deacons could distribute Communion - and they werre not ordained nor their hands consecrated.
My parish priest prefers in the hand and has said no to having a kneeler for those who want one.
Thank you for this , i used my left hand to receive the communion then pick it up with my right. After i watched this video i am so ashamed not knowing the right way of the communion. Lord Jesus Christ of Nazareth please forgive my ignorance, Most precious blood of Jesus Christ save us and the whole world. Amen
On the tongue. But after Vatican 2 we received it in our hands. I now go to a Maronite Catholic Church and we receive it on the tongue. I’d went to my granddaughter’s chorus at a Roman Catholic Church and I went up to receive and put my tongue out and the Eucharist minister said we don’t do that. I once did the same for I was a Eucharist minister and I repent of it in Jesus name Amen🙏❤️😞
I pray that one day the disrespectful practice of receiving in the hand is stopped. People must realize their hands are not blessed like the priests hands.
Our parish priest prefer communion in the hand, that is why we stop attending mass in our parish and look for another mass that is more holy and reverent. we found it on a tridentine mass 100 miles from our town.
I go to Latin Mass. Communion on the tongue, kneeling only.
"Communion on the tongue gives the impression that the person is receiving not just ordinary bread, and that the man giving it is not just an ordinary man, but that he has some extraordinary powers "
(Martin Bucer, Protestant Reformer, Germany, 1491-1551)
The 'reformers' in Germany and England had to convince Catholics that they were just receiving bread and wine, so they removed altar rails and forced communicants to stand and take the Body of Christ with their own fingers.
The plan worked in the sixteenth century and it still works in the twenty-first century.
As an extraordinary minister of the Holy Eucharist, I will only serve the Precious Blood of Jesus as I am not worthy to manhandle His Precious Body. I will always receive in my mouth.🙏
Priests receive in the mouth, never the hand.
It was not the practice to receive the wine before Vatican 2. The Body and Blood are present in the Host, no need to receive the wine. The full Divinity/ Trinity is present in the Host, as we cannot separate the Trinity. Nor can we separate the Body from the Blood. No need to receive the Wine. As I understand it the Blood/ wine is the Sacrificial Blood. Very few Catholics make a Sacrifice of their lives. Especially since so many practice contraception and support abortion.Amen
@@AlbertHess-xy7kywhen the priest breaks the Host with his hands then places it on his tongue.
@@TheHiducky The Priest breaks the Host with his hands and then places it it on his own tongue?
@@TheHiducky Is it OK to suck the Priest's fingers?
I only receive Communion on my tongue and will not have it any other way.
I think Catholics, and I'm a cradle Catholic, certainly understand and respect the utmost reverence which needs to be directed to receiving the glorious and loving gift of our Lord and Savior Jesus's real presence in the Holy Eucharist. I grew up kneeling at the communion rail and receiving the precious host on my tongue, my First Communion was made like that. Glad to see that wonderful tradition becoming re-emphasized again in almost all Catholic parishes. But with many older & infirmed congregants kneeling down and getting back up can be very painful and sometimes impossible. And distributing to those people on the tongue when they are standing in front of a Eucharistic minister can result in numerous hosts falling to the floor despite altar boys and their patens to protect against that. I speak from experience being an altar server years ago. So the hands option, while maybe not preferable, if transfer to mouth is completed quickly and with total reverance and love, should not be eliminated. It's a grave overstatement to condemn it, for sure. Let's not create problems where they don't exist.