Why Russia's T-90 is Cheap Useless Junk! | Your Favorite Tank Sucks #2
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 сен 2021
- Stop with the "Russian bias". It sucks.
═════════════════════════════════
◄► Support the channel on Patreon!
/ armorcast
═════════════════════════════════
◄► Koala's Channel
/ thescottishkoala
◄► Twitter!
/ sc0ttishkoala
◄► Merch!
teespring.com/stores/thearmory
Damn this one doin numbers...
Hullo there Lazerpig fans
This war has been showing the world just how right you are about how much these tanks suck.
LazerPig Team Up!
_TEAM UUUUUUP!!!_
BTW, what is tank from option A?
Yep, blame Lazerpig.
im a fan of you too
Waiter: Wine, sir?
Me: Yes, please give me some of your "Why the T-90 is Cheap Useless Junk! | Your Favorite Tank Sucks #2" I heard it aged perfectly.
How the hell does this not have more likes it’s hilarious and actually original(at least as far as I can tell).
Funny considering this video isn't even over a year old and already a war has occured with it being absolutely roflstomped by civilians armed with Javalins
if poor countries can afford it then you know its bad otherwise the wouldnt be able to buy them higher price means better quality often
@@GameMaker3_5 they don’t give javelins to civilians lol
@@outrider425 I thought I heard something about armed civilians taking up arms against Russia,
Maybe they were trained beforehand making them more militia than civilian...
This video has aged a lot better than many videos talking about how great the tank is
Yes, yes it has.
Redeffect is emotionally damage
considering its losing to non-NATO country this video was pretty generous as it used NATO as the enemy.
@@MuscleboundKage that non-NATO country is using NATO anti-tank weaponry, some of it (reportedly) were kept in storage since the 80's
And the tanks themselves didn't age well :D
Jokes aside, an advanced, non frontline combat vehicle hull that can be easily modified into anything from a howitzer carrier to a mobile hospital to a bridge layer should absoulty be named the John Smith.
M113 "John Smith"
John G Smith
The T14 is the best stealth tank in the world... think about it... no one has ever seen it on the battlefield!!
@@awatt Thanks!!
Lmao true😂😂😂
Still holds up 8 months later lololol
@@danielcaponi9839 Gotta be honest, I plagarised the joke... did not come up with it myself!!
Oh no worries lol, have a great weekend cheers!@@ivormectin8882
To be fair, sending tanks into urban combat situations without adequate troop support is a bad idea for any countries armour.
the issue is most prominent when you stack 2 of the 3 crew members you have right above highly explosive ammo. just about every other mbt has blowout panels that protect the crew, and don’t as frequently use era, which may make it less dangerous for troops to be near
@@panicc580 the newest T-90 variant (T-90M) have blowout panels in the back and individual wet storage for ammo in the carousel if im not mistaken. The thing is soviet tanks had no space in the turrets and russians implement it decades after NATO tanks. Budget issue and they were too late to implement it to all of their vehicles i suppose :/
@@panicc580 Thank you for repeating myths.
WHY do Russian MBTs have the ammo carousel low in the tank at the bottom of the turret? Because that is the SAFEST place to put it. US WW2 Sherman's became the least likely tanks to burn once the ammunition was moved to the bottom of the turret. Why is this? Because the bottom of the turret is the most heavily protected part of the tank and the least likely part to be hit. The carousel is where it is for their interpretation of improving crew surviveability.
Now, WHY do Russian MBTs have such a habit of their ammo brewing up? Because the carousel only holds 22 rounds. Where do the other 18 rounds go? Yup. Up in the turret, the part of the tank most likely to be hit. It's stuffed everywhere they can find space. Rarely is it the carousel that gets hit and cooks off. It's the ammunition carried up in the turret that gets hit. When crews go into battle with ONLY the 22 rounds in the carousel, as they did after sustaining heavy losses in Chechnya, the tanks rarely suffered ammunition fires. Usually only after getting hit by a HUGE IED.
T-90 improves this by putting 10 rounds into a separate bustle, but 8 rounds are still carried in the turret. (Dumb) There is nothing preventing them from putting blow-out panels on the bottom and sealing the autoloader when it is not cycling. They've just determined that it's not worth the effort.
WHY do western MBTs have blow out panels? Because they put the ammunition in a VERY vulnerable place, high in the turret. A place where it is VERY likely to be hit. Especially with top-attack munitions.
There are no solutions, only tradeoffs.
Oh my dear friend... No, the russian junks are not protected by this way... This is the protection of the Leo2s only... Bullcrap the whole video.
lack of vission in this thing makes it expacily bad idea.....you literly dont see what is coming at you lol
As we could see in past 3 weeks, its turret ejection system is utterly stellar tho
🤣 It’s the only thing that seems to function well!
🤣 🤣
Aircraft ejection systems are designed to get the crew out before the fireball. Timing on the tank still seems a little off and need improvement.
I never understand the yankee tankers. Like bro, yeah. Its not like an abrahams would survive that shot either.
@@arcani695 you're probably right. It is just that the T72s make the failure spectacular. The Abrams have a lot more technology that allows them to engage from farther, more effectively. Tank on tank at least the Abrams can shake off a lot of things. As to AGTMs, I don't know.
And now an M version got ganked by 2 Bradleys with their 25mms
@@Fusioncoreguy yea and the tank was damaged BY THE BRADLEYS
@@Fusioncoreguy didnt the drone strikes come after the bradleys already disabled the tank tho
We remember that Challenger 2 getting destroyed by a Lancet drone
@@denzonerare you kidding? any tank can be damaged by auto cannons, the t90m armor wasn't penetrated but the Bradley's gunner aimed for the optics and such thus blinding the tank
@@thesovietduck2121 when did I say other tanks couldnt
ngl the t-90 looks like the meanest tank out there, when you dont know anything about tanks and go by looks.
Yeah I really like it's looks
@SparksProx I like that, looks like medieval fish scale armour.
Apparently at the risk of giving too much credit to the Russians you analysis is spot on.. But you never did identify their vulnerability to the typical farmers tractor, who knew?
No one seems to consider if this was an Afghani farmer doing this to a US tank they would have just blown his head off to regain their tank. In the Ukraine Russia is trying to be the good guys.
@@aardvarkbiscuit2677 Russia trying to be the good guys??
What have you been drinking man?? Vodka smoothies?
Ukraine farmers tractor the real winner of the Russo-Ukraine War of 2022.
@@aardvarkbiscuit2677 Blowing up children's hospitals and killing fleeing civilians is them being "good?"
@@aardvarkbiscuit2677 Well... the US never put themselves in a position where they might have to regain their tanks from the enemy, mostly because those in charge quickly determined that tanks are pretty ineffective in the terrain of Afghanistan and thats why you almost never saw them. At least they had relatively (please note relatively) competent leadership compared to the Russian mess in Ukraine
I arrived on the lazerpig train and I gotta say, this was a good stop.
While current events are currently doing a very poor job of selling the T-90 features to potential customers they are doing and excellent job of marketing MLAWs and Javalins.
Oh, yeah. Definitely purchasing more of those Saab Group stocks. The NLAW has already proven itself over and over. And guess what? We are at the final stage of developing guided ammo for our Carl-Gustafs as well. But for the moment, I'm just happy to see so many Russian turrets being sent flying.
No T90 in ukraine 🤣🤣🤣🤣
NLAW
@@lagg1e I only watch lazerpig and related videos while drunk, this is about as good as you are going to get.
@@TheNybergCorporation Guided munitions from a Carl Gustaf? I gotta admit, I didn’t see that one coming.
my heart hurts when i see tanks in the middle of a town without infantry support
Ruzzian tank turrets have made more airtime than the ruzzian airforce. 😎 🇦🇺
Their "rapid unscheduled disassembly" capabilities are second to none
It's not even worth blowing up. They have so many tanks and so few support vehicles. You're making their logistics better by blowing them up. I'd go after the fuel trucks. They are very short on those.
turret ejection system
@@Arigator2 That´s what they are doing now... The number of destroyed support vehicles is quite important. A tank without ammo or fuel is just scrap in the middle of nowhere.
@@FPV-Drones especially so since they have more tanks than they could ever use and so little of everything else.
Hilarious!
"Doesn't have air conditioning" Probably because the convertible modification for them is so popular.
Even worse with the ukrainian ones
You don't need air conditioning in droptop tank ;)
Vladamir is named after Vladamir Popov, the chief of UVZ design bureau. Legend has it, he saved the Russian tank industry during the 1990s, partially owing to securing a very large order from India. The Vladamir name was given by the Indian delegation BTW, which UVZ later adopted
No Popov, Potkin
The turret flying wee made me die for some reason
2 things to say here:
1) this guy apparently has a time machine in his garage
2) the Scots are the only people who can talk about militaries and be correct (having also watched my fair share of LazerPig)
They have a lot of experience being on the wrong side of military tech.
@@kikidevine694 getting their shit pushed in at flodden by the english wunderwaffe (billhooks) has stuck with them ever since.
Maybe these guy is a former military servicemen have a collection of Soviet era Tanks so thats why he know this Russian T90 tanks
@@simonbarabash2151 Sorry? I couldn't hear you over the sound of Bannockburn and Stirling Bridge.
@@robertoaseremo4163 laserpig is ex British military intelligence
I was with the US Third Infantry Division in OIF1. To take out Sadaam's tanks, our M1 Abrams would fire sabot rounds and penetrate the berms concealing the enemy tanks. They would aim for the point where the turret rested on the chassis. This would ignite all of the rounds inside the turret. The explosion that resulted blew the turret 50 meters into the air, and landing about 100 meters away from the chassis. Of all the destroyed Iraqi tanks I saw, only three still had intact turrets.
One of the main drawbacks of the carousel-style autoloaders that Russian tanks employ, rather than the cassette-style on something like the Leclerc or K2 - until the T-90M, they haven't really been able to provide them with any sort of reliable protection, even against spalling and fragments.
I would suggest and I've been told this by many gunners and TC's, you'd aim for the place where the turret meets the hull because it's the centre of mass of the vehicle. You could hit a T-72 just about anywhere on the hull and blow off that turret, that autoloader is like a powder keg waiting to go off! No need for a precise hit.
The results were horrific. On day one of OIF, I saw my first decapitated tank turret. The turret was blown off, leaving the upper portion of the tanker's body in the turret and the lower half in the chassis.
@@hermanschiller2035 I'm surprised there was still a body to find
@Underpaid T-72 mechanic that name and PFP combination is beautiful
@@ArmorCast make a new video about russian tanks please. We need you roasting them so redeffect will be emotionally damage!
It's a Tank, No it's a Pressure Cooker made in Russia....T72, T80 & T90! A chefs best friend!
This aged beautifully
The emergency turret ejection system present on russian tanks is greatly undeappreciated. Makes evacuating so much easier and faster.
The dead charred bodies I mean.
val h ala vag in a .you big scsndansvian girly boy
ruclips.net/video/--6ffqOqDto/видео.html
Turkish Leopart was improved to this device too .
@@user-uy8fw5sp4t Works perfectly as intended. Ammo propellant burns off via blow-out hatch leaving crew unharmed. Russian T-series crap literally cooks soldiers alive.
@@macles9051 and they are about to roll them into Ukraine currently overflowing with javelin missiles alot of Vlads are going to get turned to toast
This has aged well. A bunch of shopkeepers and drone enthusiasts are wrecking all that vaunted Russian armor. And now rasputista is upon us
Not even mentinoing the Ukrainian farmers who are stealing Russian equipment left, right and center.
Source: ukr propaganda 😂👌
@@rog69 Whatever the actual facts on the ground are, the Russian army is no acquitting itself well against greatly inferior opposition. Even if they do manage to occupy the whole country, which is now far from certain, they will only face a gigantic partisan war they can never win. They should have studied their own history from WWII before starting this.
@@odysseusrex5908 yeah but the media and all these clowns in comments can’t seem to choose the narrative. Either they are winning, farmers wiping the floors with russian tanks, tractor go brrrt, Russians abandoning shit left n right and their young conscripts surrendering, russia asking China for help and basically about to cave in. Or they are losing, Russians are hammering their cities, killing civilians, encircling them, big evil Russian army hunts down their women and babies, Europe and nato must help, no-fly zone asap, but we shall prevail because partisan warfare is the way of the little ppl. What a joke.
@@rog69 Try to keep telling yourself that for now if it makes you feel better, but Putin isn't going to be able to keep pretending all those losses don't exist when thousands of young men who died in all that destroyed Russian equipment don't come home to their mothers.
I dont even know about tanks. And i still had quite a good laugh. Nothing like a Scotsman making sarcastic jokes. Gained some new knowledge along the way too.
For the next YFTS video, while this was a year ago and you've likely already selected and storyboarded one out, I'd love to see the Abrams. As an American I've grown up with it as the baseline against which all other tanks (and their doctrines) are judged, so I'd be mighty curious to see what sorts of glaringly obvious flaws it has from a Scotsman's point of view.
The superior plate and the space between the hull and turret is unarmored, it gets hit, turret stuck.
From the front, anything can go trough a quarter of its profile because of this.Worse is right under the gun, it will break it if it gets hit there.
The jet engine is pointless, the german one performs better in every way without the maintenence hassle.
And like any modern tank, it may as well not be armored in the sides and rear.
@@denisionescu5072 The jet engine is fine in the US military (though the reasons they chose it ended up being irrelevant) but outside the unique logistics the US has the diesel makes way more sense.
If they were making it new today it would have a diesel in it for sure. Hasn't really held it back much especially once they were upgraded with APUs.
@@danlorett2184
What's an APU? Isn't the Abram's gas turbine engine supposed to be able to run on a bunch of different types of fuels, or am I confusing it with a different tank/engine(a British one maybe)?
@@HighlanderNorth1 Auxiliary Power Unit. It's a smaller generator that gets mounted onto the Abrams so it doesn't have to run the engine all the time.
And yes, the Abrams turbine can run on other types of fuel. It runs worse on those, though. And the US has never run into logistical issues widespread enough to actually use this feature - it was originally intended to make defending Western Europe easier if the Soviets invaded because the rest of NATO uses diesel tanks. That way American tanks could still be run even if they only had diesel.
@@danlorett2184 So basically Russia is Loki and the Aesir (western militaries) ultimately have all their cool shit as a 4result of constantly having to deal with russia's bullshit?
Russia saw this video and thought you had some great points. They then decided to prove how accurate 1991 was to their actual conventional capability by invading Ukraine.
Going swell for them!!!
nazi russian invasion on Ukraine
@@wnose seeing as how they'll be in Kyiv soon,...
@@Blitzkrieger89 LOL, the Russians took 10 years to capture Avdiivka. Recently, Ukraine nearly ran out of ammo and arms recently but the front lines barely changed.
At this rate of advance, the Russians will reach Kyiv in 2090!
T90 can't reverse because Stalin said "Not one step back." This shows in all aspects of soviet combat doctrine.
You can take a step back but we dont want friendly fire turned on now do we. xD
So the exact opposite of french battle doctrine?
We say here: "If you are out of ammunitions, just remember to yourself: you are a proud son of Soviet Russia, a communist, comrade! - After this you can shoot again".
@гиперлуп lol
You're kidding, Correct?
this aged well!
The most boring part is when we read comments from a six year old boy pretending to be an arm expert.
Hard to get a real estimate but they don’t seem to have been doing too well in the current ‘special military operation’ in Ukraine. I think if any of the modern antitank missiles achieve a hit, then the T90 is toast and the added birdcage mesh armour doesn’t work either. Modern shoulder launch missiles are scary things!
From the photos and videos, both the slat canopy and ERA are readily defeated by current ATGMs. The canopies are so ineffective I have to wonder if they weren't just a failed attempt to confuse vision systems.
On video, the tanks almost instantly brew up. After action pictures show most turrets popped off, suggesting they also had a very quick cascade rather than a slow cook-off. Survivability chances must be grim.
@@1djbecker Yes, grim stuff indeed. I can only assume the turret grills were a last minute add on but why they thought it would be effective against modern AT missiles is beyond me. I remember reading a book about about Padres in WW2. They often helped with the removal of remains from knocked out tanks; Other crews were never allowed to help. I often thought that politicians should be made to read books like this before they started wars.
@@nor0845 Politicians should be handed a rifle and sent to the front lines on a rotation basis so all of them have a chance to become heroes.
@@nor0845 They're russian. The just say "They will do the job comrade" and then you gotta believe it and die for the cause or you're going to the gulag. It's just like Chernobyl, "everything is well under control".
"DRIVER DOWN & OUT OF FUEL"
they shouldve played more hill climb racing for fuel management cause they need it
Man... Usually it take a fine wine 10 years to age on YT. This one aged perfectly in only 5 months! Its almost as if Ukraine took this video, sat their infantry down and had them watch and study every point. And then executed their YT training perfectly!
youtube training? if ceasar could see us now.
Well it doesn’t help that russia tactics are a joke
@@SuperZombiepimp lol if that aint true. At best they're questionable decision making. I'm still trying to figure out who the guys were that attacked Georgia in '08 and Ukraine in '14?
I get circumstances were a bit different but still... I bet Putin would like that setup back. Just goes to show what 8 years of preparation and international assistance looks like.
Joke's on Putin indeed.
@@ICU1337 Ukraine is losing pitifully
@@pavelshnaps2345 sure thing Vlad. Hows that retreat... erm I mean "Special Operation Back to Russia" coming along?
It appears the intention is to use this tank against far smaller and less sophisticated nations. My guess is, this tank is designed with the idea that it can conquer non-NATO nations because it won't be fighting NATO arms; this assumption was proven wrong in Ukraine recently.
Kinda. I mean, they did in fact crush Ukraine to dust in less than two weeks. Were about to take the capital before politics and, depending on whom you believe, a negotiated settlement Ukraine broke. It was only after Ukraine had already lost that 'nato' (read: the united states) remembered the natural gas and lithium recently found in Ukraine and decided they'd rather their puppet have it than russia. That's when the script got flipped and Russia started losing
Some of the comments I see on this video when sorting by new always give me a good chuckle.
"Where the fuck is the air coditioner?!"
~Sun Tzu
What do you want hair conditioner for?
This is Golden 😅
And this is before the Russian crew sabotage the tank so that they don't have to actually engage in combat. Personally, I don't blame them since the one guaranteed feature in all Russian tanks is that their turrets pop off with incredible ease (thanks to poor ammo storage and their autoloader).
Russia is broke and their starving at home and their family needs them at home.to see to their needs and their just places the Russian soldier need to be.necause their family is more important than blowing up Ukrainian families.
This does seem like a giant diversion from the corrupt mess that Russia has become.
the fact is that t-14 uses systems that almost all other tanks from 80s and 90s already has and they acting like thats a new thing
I mean this is the country that has their national propaganda department showing off their first automatic, self-serve checkouts at grocery stores… in 2023
@@ArmorCast self-serve checkouts at grocery stores… in 2023. who told you about that shit? watch videos from Moscow and Piter and envy
What do you mean tanks arent supposed to incinerate the whole crew when penetrated?
We are cooking the mobiks for them to join the meat cube
@@TonyChan-eh3nzNoncredible defense for the win!
Not a bug, but feature. Saves the embarrassment. 😂
@@wnose glorious Russia is always ahead of the pack. In this game of 5d uno, Putin holds all the cards!
I remember watching this video back in December and thinking that you made valid points. But I just couldn't believe the T90 was so worthless. Fast forward to day 9 of the invasion of Ukraine and I'm trying to figure why Russia would invade anybody with that thing. It really does suck.
LOL Russia is terrible at war
I guess the logic was that Ukraine is using the same ex-Soviet crap. They must not have realized that you no longer need a tank to kill another tank.
@@Echelon030 tanks are becoming more obsolete
@@liammiddleton3064 not neccesarily
but tank on tank is
Russia sucks in general...
4:34 you're going to make Matsimus cry aren't you
hi odst spartam we meet again
This aged so very well 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ya know y’all are kinda funny cuz your country could have hundreds if not THOUSANDS of destroyed t90s and t72s, but once even a single western tank is destroyed, y’all don’t shut up. I know 20 leopards were destroyed by Russia within 24 hours, but atleast its not 2,000.
@@Theinitedstatesofamerics12345 2000(est)x3.47Mil average price, vs 20x8.9mil average price + not counting previous Armored Dvl losses...
Now lets count all tank losses, 1889x3.47mil vs 1237(Via kyiv Independent)x6.7mil average price...
Lol you start seeing a huge difference.
@@Ramelousy well I’m pretty sure the crew has a better chance of survival in the leopard tank.
@@Theinitedstatesofamerics12345 It infact, does not. Seen by the Leo 2A6 burning down over a campfire, the crew couldn't escape because the heat enveloped them in seconds, ammunition caught flame as soon as it got hot enoug.
@@Ramelousy what about an abrams? Their gonna be sent to Ukraine eventually.
T series tanks, best turret release mechanism in the world
Definetly the quickest.
When a Scotsman is insulting your tank, you know you've got a crappy tank.
Tbh, it's a bit rich considering the last home grown Scottish military tactic of note involved running straight ahead yelling with a basket-hilted broadsword and Targe.....
I’m really confused..
Did They drink their own
Kool-aid or is this more tZu cunning and Leninist dialectics..
If they are really slipping now would be the time for the West to actually finish them because if not they will Certainly finish us.
Hoot Mon!
@@CS-zn6pp Oh I dunno, harness the raw fury (and engineering nouse) of the Scottish and you might accidently find yourself owning a 1/4 of the worlds surface in "a fit of absence of mind".
@@anachronisticon funnily enough "nouse" is a word that originates in Yorkshire...
How many hours the Challenger episode is going to be?
LOL...good one. Even if they realized that and put some modernization program on at least...but too late it seems.
Already done
ratchet2505 challenger 3 go brrrr
It'll probably be it's own series. Full length television features coming out in weekly installments for the next decade.
It’s still way better than a T90. And let’s not talk about Leopard survivability.
All of the countries that have been buying Russian military equipment for decades are now going......."Oh...crap".
Turret had more hang time than Michael Jordan in his prime!
Tank loader: "Commander, what's the standard procedure if we get hit by enemy?"
Commander: "Standard procedure is to jump 10 meters high and spread in the surrounding area"
The T-72's turret is a formidable twelve-tonne ballistic anti-aircraft system which automatically activates whenever the tank senses it is being attacked.
Buahahahaa
@spoogegoat, T-72, T-80, and T-90 are being blown up to pieces in Russia-Ukraine war as of Saturday, September 17, 2022. Thanks to U.S Javelin missiles, and British NLAW. Boohoo!
T 72 is junk.
In fact, t-72 are good tanks. Just don't shoot at them.
It’s got reactive turret armor that explodes when it’s hit.
0:14 such a beautiful spot for enemy RPG operator to hit both tanks from the top
No one is hated more than the one telling the truth.
-Sokrates
Well this video aged like a fine wine. Don’t forget about newest feature namely “cope cages”
This aged well!
It sure did!
Well this aged like wine.
Don't forget the 80 year old engine, bruh.
"Turret launching door stoppers" is not only the funniest line it was also prophetic. 🤣
It wasn't prophetic, it was simply observation.
T-72s did it and the T-90 is just an updated T-72 so of course it would become a contestant in the turret launching Olympics!
En Siria, Afganistán, Irak, Somalia y otros países donde EEUU o sus aliados se han visto muchos vídeos en los que se ven como los sobrevalorados Abraham de los EEUU eran destruidos por simples RPG y las torretas salían volando, pero he visto videos donde tankes T 90 eran alcanzados por Javelins y otros lanzadores anti tankes y han seguido luchando, incluso a uno que fue alcanzado 3 veces por un Javelin y ha conseguido destruir 2 blindados armados y lograr retirarse con el T90 hechando humo negro y a mucha menor velocidad pero cumplió con su misión, esperad que el T 14 ARMATA empiece a producirse en masa, los opinologos y militares de occidente dicen que no existe, que es propaganda rusa, se basan en el tiempo que llevan desarrollando el tanke, pero es mejor descubrir todos los fallos que puedan tener, EEUU tardo 24 años en sacar el F22 y solo hicieron alrededor de 110 y dejaron de producirlos o el FALLOS 35 al que le han detectado más de 700 fallos lo que les ha hecho perder varios contratos de venta, además que el SUKOI 35 es mucho mejor avión que el F35 y esperad que se empiece a construir el SUKOI 57, ese que dicen que no existe 😂😂😂 Ya está en Ucrania combatiendo aunque sólo sean 11 pero ya a pasado todas las pruebas y no en entrenamientos sino en guerra, son los que se ocupan de destruir la defensa aérea de Ucrania y la destrucción de toda la red eléctrica de Ucrania, para el año que viene RUSIA tendrá dos escuadrones del.
SUKOI 57 además de tener como compañeros y operar con ellos al UAV Hotnic 70,.
VIVA RUSIA Z Z Z Z Z Z
@@angeldorado8859 ay estos latinos y su fetiche por che Guevara y Castro
@@robkaufman1328 no se para ti , para mi el Che fue un asesino 👍 un saludo y por cierto soy español
Came here after seeing the Russians abandon these tanks in Ukraine. Now I know why. You weren't kidding, these tanks are trash.
The videos show them without surrounding troops. Tanks without troops can survive only on open plains. There they must have air superiority to survive.
@@algrayson8965 Just because many T80 & T90 has been destroyed in Ukraine, doesn't mean that any other US or EU tanks are better ... just that the drones and Javalin anti tank missiles are way too powerful and made the Tanks as a machine obsolete in my opinion...
Not sure why so many Americans are bragging how their tanks are much better, I doubt they can survive a Javalin missile
It isn't necessarily about the tank itself, the performance is determined by how they are cared for and the tactics in which they are used.
Don't bother trying to be factual this lot are only interested in Abrams and leopards no matter how many of those tanks are also destroyed in combat its only the Russian tanks that are bad
So, in essence, it's still bad as apperantly the tactics and care employed by its main operator are quite literally sh**.
@@matthewrowe9903 My apologies, but are you being sarcastic? I can't tell..
@@matthewrowe9903 The T-72, in the modern age, is a bad tank, end of discussion. If we were talking about the 70s and 80s, it could be argued that it was the best tank in the world.
Sounds like a nuanced take...
I do like your videos mate, I'm an ex-3RTR Tankie. Now...having an open ammo carousel in the turret floor would scare the shit out of me especially when the hatches are left open....When you watch these trials in Eastern Europe of these Russian tanks built under license etc....flying over obstacles, firing in mid-air etc. I'll tell you a home truth as an ex-tank crewman. It's all for show obviously....in reality, every piece of stowage inside and outside is going to total f**king shit! There would be kit flying everywhere! Your radios, ammo, personal weapons, rations, tool kit and alsorts would be everywhere! Plus the entire crew would in reality, probably would be unconcious! I know this from driving a Chieftain across country at night and my commander missed seeing what was refered to after as 'Pritches VTOL' bump lmfao! I was thrown out of the cab, nearly crunched by the gun monster, headsets came off and I was hanging on to the splash plate for grim life! My commander, gunner and loader were out for the count. I managed to pull myself back into the cab and bring the tank to a stop, hit the drivers safety switch to disable the gun kit before dragging myself semi-concious upstairs to check on the turret crew. I still have pics somewhere of my loader holding his seat which had been 'eaten' by the gun monster. That stuff belongs on jeremy clarkson not the battlefield lol! Having had the luck to play with the M1 and Leopard 2....crew skills are a massive point! The Turkish Leo's and to an extent M1 losses were due to loaders short cutting drills. 2 British RTR gunnery instructors died in Wales because they short cutted drills (RIP brothers, Fear Naught!) I did stupid things as a loader back in the day, yeah, fuck it....I'll have a few bag charges stacked on the turret floor, it's only ranges....never in war though. M1 and Leo2 don't commit to the equal triangle of a tank. Fire power, armour and manoeuvrability. They sacrifice the armour bit. That's probably why no CR1 or CR2 have never been knocked out by enemy fire. I think that actually applies to Chieftain too! The Kuwaties ran over the border because they ran out of ammo lol!
they hated him because he told them the truth...
Tankies aren't known for their critical thinking skills
@@nutyyyy i don't think you know what a Tankie is lol
@@yourtrappedinmygenjutsu i dont think you know what critical thinking is
@@nutyyyy
Tankies are the pro-China people.
Pro-Russian people should be called Kremlin Gremlins
@@ieat10kittens94 shit that burns
You should also do a “Your most hated tanks are actually good” series
Sherman moment
Abrams moment
@@FoxtrotStudi0s ehhh the abrams isnt as good as Americans like to think it is its about as good as most big nato countries mbts
Bob Sample Tank
@@Klimotine It’s arguably one of the best MBT’s, yet all the stuff I ever see on it is how bad and “outdated” it is, and the points boil down to “America bad, it sucks up too much fuel, it’s h e a v y, it’s expensive”
Then praise the leopard which for some odd reason (and nobody ever seems to listen to this extremely clear point) that the Leopard and Abrams are basically the same tank as a joint project, seeing as they were developed together pretty much Since the early days with the only true differences being looks, engine, and the type of armor with the Abrams using DU/composite and the Leo just using composite, but with the same armor layout and thickness as the Abrams and vice versa,
The Abrams is in such an odd spot, everybody seems to fanboy over the Abrams…. Where are they? Every video I watch on it nobody ever compliments it at all, every article seems to try and be like “the Abrams can’t survive even a .22 bullet to the side(especially with cnn’s stunt)
In all my years of loving the Abrams, Ive come across maybe 4 comments who say the Abrams is good, and maybe 1 person saying “omg it’s the best in the world!!!!”
And Ive yet to find any true reason why it’s hated, and when I read any sort of arguement on it being easy to kill they bring up the export models-
Models made with only steel no DU or composites to be found on it, and say “see??? Abrams IS bad you’re just a faNboY the T-55 is a better tank”
Considering the losses Western armor suffered in Russo-Ukranian conflict, Leopards, Bradleys, Marders and Challengers are very expensive useless junk. Laying French AMX-10RC and M113 aside.
I think they changed the autoloader to fit bigger projectiles, and the turret is different.
sadly it still a canibal
Fun fact: auto-loaders not only eat arms, but also tend to pop the turret off like a bottle cap when hit by missiles.
Yeah I notice that in the Ukraine war the Hauls just pop off but what about the tank crew they die a quick death of agonizing one?
@@Aaron-8989 with all the ammo inside blowing off, you bet the crew got a quick death
@@Aaron-8989 lets just say that due to the ammo exploding, you dont have to wory about pulling the bodies out. you wash them out with a hose.
Yes the ammo carousel is not a great Idea for crews.
Fun fact the autoloader cannot eat arms you have to be trying to get your arm chopped off. And the autoloader isnt an issue. Poorly stored ammo in the turret is.
The T-90 doesnt have blowout panels. No Russian T series haven them. They were never put into mass production on their fielded tanks, because it was determined to be too expensive to retrofit.
The T90M has a storage rack behind the turret with blowout panels for extra ammunition on the outside of the tank, that is not the same thing as blow out panels in the tank itself to protect the crew.
The crew is still sitting on a powder keg.
Do we have any info on the K2 or the K2PL? I don't know as much about armoured vehicles as you, so even if I'd look for any info I'd have no way of knowing if it's actually true. I'm just wondering if the polish government is making a good decision to switch to the Korean construction instead of German one (or the future one that they want to do with France).
K2 is one of the best tanks out there today, arguably THE best. It’s basically a Leopard 2A7 but ten tonnes lighter. Good engine, really good sensors and optics, best tank gun on the market today, and supposedly DAMN good armor for its weight class!
One of the main reasons Poland will have chosen it is the autoloader, which is something most of their army is used to using having come from old Soviet autoloading tanks. K2’s is MUCH better - faster, better protected and more reliable - and it means they don’t suddenly have to recruit and train a bunch of tank loaders
Another amusing failure of its active protection system that’s been discovered: it’s apparently only operating when the tank is running. Which is fine.. unless your tank column is shut down to preserve fuel as you sit stationary on a road.
And even when it’s functioning, the trick is to fire your missile over the tank then drop the crosshairs on the target at the last moment before the protection system can react.
Their tanks would be running.. back to Russia if they had fuel.
singlehandedly the dumbest comment ever lol. this isn't war thunder
Western APS isn't bulletproof either. No APS is.
" the trick is to fire your missile over the tank " The Javelin missile is designed to do exactly that.
@@Arigator2 Russia has one of the largest oil reserves in the world. To think they'd run out of fuel is ridiculous. Europe is soon running out of oil and gas though.
When you wake up and you're still assigned to a T-90: Ah shit, here we go again
:)
Still better then waking up in ukraine army uniform.
One of the best tanks to be in.
T-90A, shown getting hit in southern Aleppo at 5:01, was not damaged & its crew got out without injuries.
It was placed back into service after a simple replacement of its ERA brick, which detonated & defeated the incoming projectile, before it could damage it.
You can see the remnants of expl. reactive armor & warhead burning up on top of the hull.
@@tropickman what about the one that got its turret flung off? Is the crew okay too?
@@mikailvito7200 yes because we'll just rig it up with bombs and send it out lol
😂😂😂😂 dude I love this video!! Made my day man!!! Thanks for the laugh my friend!!
So if the T90A was originally called the T72BU, wouldn’t the modernized variant be called T72BUM?
Pretty sure the only T-72BU part that the T-90A has is its turret. T-72BU had a different hull and gun (or maybe that was Obj. 187. People like to interchange their designations). As far as I know, T-72BU is more close to T-90 Obr. 1992, which (Obr. 1992) was basically a T-72B with T-80UK subsystems. Just minus the 2A66, which required ammunition that was exclusively just for 2A66.
I suppose Obr. 1992, and all the other improved T-72 projects was made because the military was not very happy with the complex nature of T-64, and complex and resource needy nature of T-80. But their subsystems were were quite good. So they wanted to mix things up with the relatively simple and not-so-resource-needy nature of the T-72B chassis.
Why it was named to T-90, I don't think anyone has a definitive reason as to why. Could be for economic reasons or morale/propaganda reasons or because there were too many letters or because it was a mix of 2 different tanks or because it was a better T-72 (Or a mixture of the aforementioned reasons because these kinds of things are rarely smooth, clean cut, and simple as one thing). A T-72 that wasn't a step - or at least complete step - behind the T-80. At least in regards to subsystems (i.e. FCS). T-72s, to this day, are still the economic tank. The step-behind version of the best that the military has. Maybe they just wanted to keep that tradition. But that's just my pure speculation.
T-90s in their entire life have always been the better T-72. A tank for the "elites". It would be incorrect to say that T-90 is the exact same as T-72, but it would also be incorrect to say that T-90 is completely different from T-72.
Sorry if I went off topic. I just felt like it
As an american, please rag on the Abrams as much as you want. It's already proven itself as a superior tank but there's always room for improvement. Criticism is the only way we improve.
This, one reason Ukraine is doing so well is NATO countries have been so worried for years that our tactics for coping with a potential Russian invasion weren't good enough, so we've been cooperating and organising military exercises for decades, now Ukraine has had experts from various European countries and the US on how to potentially deal with Russian tank attacks, and got anti-tank equipment and it's really paid off.
Meanwhile in Russia...
"Breaking news: Local Man executed for criticizing military"
@@G1NZOU Eating up the western propaganda eh...anybody who gets in a tank in this day and age is a moron..
@@bigstuff52 you mad ? hahha russia is a joke and will fall apart and be split up into 6 countries soon
Jet engines spend fuel as much as in light load as in full load, thats the issue with the abrams.
This aged well.
In other news, the bots are trying _reeeeeeaaally_ hard to convince people that up is down, the sky is green and that T-90 > M1 Abrams, aren't they?
So "Vladimir" miserably failed in an actual conflict. Who would've thought.
Russian crews hates this tank so much that they gift it to Ukrainian farmers the moment a General is no longer looking.
After selling its fuel to the farmer. Throw in the tank with the deal. Here, farmer, is 50 tons of scrap steel! Enjoy!
Congrats on your nationality change! TAK isn't really as good as TSK though...
More like TSAK now lol. Looks like your lad is Mr. Worldwide now I guess
American Koala?
If you told most Americans that you were from NYC, they’d believe you.
Y'all are sus
If they hooked the crew seats to the turrets with parachutes they can claim it is a modern crew ejection turret!
yeah for some reason we found one on the flat bed of a truck here in America that just happened to have been in combat 2 weeks ago.
T-72, T-80 and T-90 are all more or less variants of the T-64. But what i wonder is, how can you dare to claim the T-90 first got blow off panels with the T-90M? All the T-72s T-80s and T-90 had blow off panels from the very first day. It just had a different name in the sovjetunion. In the west, we call it blow off panels, in russia they call it "turret".
😀😃👍
In America turret shoots round. In Russia round shoots turret
It doesn't really seem like they have blow out panels. But i gess if you are being hit with a Javelin it just doesn't matter your turret is going to pop off. Lol
@@pieppy6058 Heehee, it's funny because Russian tank turrets go brr.
When they pop off they look like a giant lollypop. I guess that's what you can call *"lollypopping"?*
Can't wait for the M1 Abrams, the internet darling Merkava, and the world's most expensive tea kettle; Challenger 2.
M1 Abram is too good
@@ExitGamesLabs ok
@@ExitGamesLabs Sure
@@ExitGamesLabs ok
@@ExitGamesLabs
middle east says otherwise 😂😂🤣🤣🤣
I keep seeing videos of these T-72 series tanks with the gun flopping around and it really makes me wonder if their stabilizers are just.. . Breaking or never even working...
T 90: 😭
T 14: 💀
The Russian way to make the T-14 indestructible...don't send it to war😅
@@veritaspk Yeh any of the 20 built😂
This video aged pretty well.
What do you expect? Who’d buy anything made by Russian knuckle staggers?
Thanks man...
Split laff beer ALL over my new 144 curved gaming monitor..
I'm a disabled vet on a fixed income. Took me 5 years to save up for.
You good bastard!
YES the best tank trolling series continues
Дa
Honestly it looks more like a facetious fault finding
Is this satire, or is he being for real?
I like the T-90.
It's a very good M tank.
ruclips.net/video/--6ffqOqDto/видео.html
I served as a Staff Sgt.
in the US Army on a M60A1 MBT and an M551 Sheridan.
I guarded the West/East German Border in the 1970s and early 1980s with the 3rd Armored Division for 6 years. We expected to see the Fulda Gap FULL of T-62's and T-72's. :)
"SPEARHEAD!"
As an army brat I was there (Paderborn) at the same time because my dad was doing the same job. Only, for a different boss. I think we got there with the Chieftain, and left with Challenger Mk1. My dad would laugh at the suggestion of Russian tanks reaching Germany. He was convinced they were ineffectual unless you controlled the railway. Whereas now, they're ineffectual for a dozen good reasons. Tanks are fast becoming the modern equivalent of the Battleship.
I served with the 1st Combat Communications Squadron USAF in Weisbaden West Germany 80-83. We supported the 3rd Armored Division with Radio Relay, Satcom, and Forward Air Control. I think we were living in Tents everywhere from Germany to Spain, All of Europe and a Lot of Africa. Even Beirut. Glad to hear from someone there at the same Time. 👍
I was there, had just got reassigned from 106s in CONUS to the TOW II. We also expected to see a tidal wave of BDRMs, BMPs, BTRs ZSU23-4s and PT-76s.
ROCK OF THE MARNE!
This is no surprise even being able to move is a surprise even their nuclear weapons would be unstable stored since the cold war like all their military, navy, air force
The funniest tank comparison 😂 I loved it!
What makes it menacing is that it stares into your soul
Damn those red drunk eyes!!
Beginning to think Ukraine needs more 50 Cal Armor Piercing, or just more soft ground so Russian tanks bottom out.
Too bad Russians invaded when the ground was still frozen and Ukraine troops run away like chickens! 🐔
🇷🇺☦️Z
Today is the first day of spring and over in Ukraine the forests are now swamps.
@@jamesgraham4586 Yes, didn't help the defense of, what are we at now, 3 nuclear powerplants? That said kudos to that teacher who took down a Ruskie helo. Something to tell the grandkids alright.
@@bombsawaylemay770 Cope M*scovite, 30 helicopters in Kherson gone, low morale, troops abandoning fully stocked vehicles.
@@donaldkasper8346 In the north it's two more days of very cold weather. It's not a good time to be sleeping in a tank that is short of fuel. Early next week will be mud.
6:07 The frontal weak spots of the T-90 absolutely killed me.
RUclips randomly rsccomended me this vid and i think its due to me watching lazerpig great video always love watching people make fun of russian military equitment
Man this video aged like fine wine considering the wars taking place.
Just because many T80 & T90 has been destroyed in Ukraine, doesn't mean that any other US or EU tanks are better ... just that the drones and Javalin anti tank missiles are way too powerful and made the Tanks as a machine obsolete in my opinion...
Not sure why so many Americans are bragging how their tanks are much better, I doubt they can survive a Javalin missile..
Same thing happened with T72M, those were export versions that were supposed to be weaker yet have been upgrade with a brand new laser designator and thicker frontal armor resulting being better than the original.
I want that mod...
This video is brilliantly informative, and prescient and is one of the funniest on Yu toob. Thanks.
Cos the turrets keep flying
I loved the Ukrainian tax office advice to anyone acquiring a Russian tank. You don't need to worry about any tax liability as these tanks are so bad they do not meet the value required to pay tax on!
They are a good supply of scrap metal. Just like the tens of thousands of wrecked and abandoned military vehicles after WWII. They littered the landscape in late 1945-46. By the 1950s they were just about all gone, sent back into the blast furnaces where they came from.
The farmers will probably get more value from the commander's machine gun and the scrap metal more than from a complete tank.
Farm simulator 2022 new dlc expansion
>>Russian tanks are bad ahahaha
But not the Ukranian-made "OPLOT" tank, yeah? You hypocrites.
@@user-ss6co6vj5f you mean, a tank that basically doesn't exist and nobody cares about? Yeah, maybe it's bad, but who gives a shit?
Now that we have 4 weeks of the Russian army using these things in actual combat and PROVING they are crap there's no more debating the issue.
You've been listening to fucking western propaganda they mostly use the T-14, not the T-90, also, they wiped out the ukrainian army and airforce and that excuse of a navy they have within a hour and are handling ukraine with children's gloves to avoid civilian casualties. If they went in on the armed civilians with full force, ukraine would be in russian hands within around 30 minutes. I'm tired of seeing people like you actually believing this bullshit western propaganda.
@@flightmaster9331 „to avoid civilian casualties „ 🤣😂🤣😂
@@flightmaster9331 Right. So what else are you gonna tell me? They have 64,000 variants of T-14 and have robots capable of instantly constructing railways?
Just because many T80 & T90 has been destroyed in Ukraine, doesn't mean that any other US or EU tanks are better ... just that the drones and Javalin anti tank missiles are way too powerful and made the Tanks as a machine obsolete in my opinion...
Not sure why so many Americans are bragging how their tanks are much better, I doubt they can survive a Javalin missile
@Omar Al-Maitah the American tanks and European tanks are 100 times better friend. lol. They’re at least up to date
Hey, I'm looking for the video of the t90 hit 19 times with a javelin. Can you help me find it?
Proper good video innit😄. Love watching videos from you and matsimus
aged like fine wine