The NIKON D500 'TRINITY' LENSES. 3 Lenses for D500 Perfection Wide to Telephoto
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- The NIKON D500 'TRINITY' LENSES. 3 Lenses for D500 Perfection Wide to Telephoto
IF YOU LIKE THESE VIDEOS, YOU CAN MAKE A KIND DONATION OF $2 OR $5 VIA PAYPAL LINK HERE: www.paypal.com...
(paypal email: kenw111@insightbb.com)
Man, your videos are the closest I can get to these fabulous equipments you’re showing!
I ha e the 17-55, 200-500, and an 80-200 push pull 👍👍. Great videos!!
I enjoy those Steve perry videos too
Tokina 11-16 2.8 , Nikon 17-55 2.8 and 35mm 1.8. Awesome for Nikon D500
I still have the first two from my Nikon D200 days.
Sigma ART 35 f1.4
Get that nikon the fuck outta here lmfaooooooo
The DX 35mm f1.8G is a HELL of a lens, but check ANY site of a google search, and they will say the 35mm ART is THE wide angle prime for either FF or DX.
on DX the 35mm is ALMOST too much, I'd almost prefer a Nikkor 20mm f1.8, but that's super wide...and its fantastic
I looooooove this man! I looooove photography. Makes me relax after my daily work with the first grade at the school. Hugs from Oslo Ben And Thanks for your time making this informative videos.
After much research on everyone's opinion, 2 years ago I got the 200-500 as first new lens for the D500. Second lens was the 17-55. It really is incredible, if only for the look of that awesome front element. Really valued your obviously learned opinions Ken. Confirmed when you mentioned Steve Perry. He struck me as a straight shooter like you; not selling any equipment. Super happy with both lens.
Just bought a D500 and the 200-500mm set up going to Australia and NZ with family next week thx for the video
ok!! haha I love how you start, followed by a little giggle :)
bit crazy :)
Great overall pick for 3 lenses. I love my 17-55, sharp, contrasty even wide open and pro build, you are right about that lens after going through some consumer ones and then finally getting it, only to kick myself asking, "Why did I not just get this one at first?" The 11-16 Tokina perhaps the best ultra wide if to add one more.
I like my D500 bastard Trinity. Tamron 15-30 f/2.8 VC, Nikkor 24-70 f/2.8G, Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 VC.
also 100% valid :P
I swear by my 200-400mm f4 vrII on my d500 even though its a heavy old beast
Would you say that your comment at the 9:00 mark would now be "Sell your 70-200 nikon VR2 and get the Tamron 70-200 Gen2?" Thanks for all your awesome videos and knowledge.
What lens can you recommend me for street photography using Nikon D7200 ?... I already use all the time 17-55mm ... but i want to know your opinion about that. Thanks.
To my Yankee friend!
Your videos are awesome!
great video, a lot of information, thanks.
I happen to use as main body D850 + 14-24mm2.8/G , 24-70mm 2.8/G and 70-200 2.8 FL AMAZING!!! I sold my Nikon D810,17-55 and 70-200 VR1 For 70-200 FL. And maybe the 200-500 5.6 FL next.
lol I love the end 😂
Thank you Ken! I recently purchased the D500 with 200-500mm lens in a kit called the sports and wildlife kit, included the vertical grip, 2 - 32GIG XQD cards, 2 - XQD card readers, 2 - batteries ... and a few other trinkets, all for the price of what you'd pay for the lens and camera alone. I don't know if I can afford the new 70-200 but I am currently trying to nab the 60mm micro for a song. It isn't part of your trinity but it is a must have, especially if you want to do macro.
yes, my wallet is still screaming over the 70 200 hahhahahaah!!!!!
Richard Wall
I still scream past two weeks now, but is time I will start singing.....
Richard Wall where did you purchase this, if you don’t mind me asking ?
Thank you again for the recommendation of the 17-55.
I only bought it because of your recommendation and I am so glad I did. At first I was scared because it cost more than I planned to pay and doesn't help with wildlife shots (fantastic for landscapes) but the more I used it, the more I began to understand how amazing it is. This lens makes me realize the potential of photography. That is saying quite a bit.
Thanks again.
Michael Reed I just bought one yesterday. It. Is. Amazing.
I'm curious about the "who" is saying you can't use FX lenses on DX cameras.
many of them
I also have the D500. I use Tokina 11-20mm f/2.8, Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8, Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G & Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 OS.
Is there a "trinity" prime lenses for the D500?
I was unaware that you could override crop mode on Nikon. You learn something new every day.
Getting the most out of the frame coverage and then cropping in post has to be the only sane thing to do, if your workflow is exclusively raw. I'm sure the fancy-pants programs will let you set up some sort of crop preset on a per-lens basis. Optimise it then blaze away, baby.
sure U can :)
2:36. I didn’t know Nikon did a 500mm f/2.8 lens? I thought they went from the 400mm f/2.8 to the 500 f/4?
For those who want to save a little more money, go with the D500, the Nikkor 17-55mm used, the Tamron 70-200 2.8 G2 and the Tamron 100-200. You can save yourself a lot of money and get back very close to the same capability.
Zoom with your feet. Love it! Been watching a few of your videos but never subscribed. Guess you're starting to grow on me, gonna subscribe as soon as I'm done. This is an old post but keep up the good, solid work.
When you “zoom with your feet” we call the technique “using your Nike zoom”.
A little off topic, I love my old Nikon D40 with its CCD sensor. What is the single best lens for this camera without breaking the bank?
18-55 kit lens used :)
Have you ever tested the non vr nikkor 80-200 screw zoom? Those used to have good rep back in the days. Cheap and sharp with good aparture i believe they were 2,8. They also came as a sliding zoom with not that good rep.
good one.
You kinda jumped around alot and the trinity wasn't very clear, here's what I think it is: the 200-500, the 17-55 2.8 DX and the 70-200 2.8 (new one) you also threw in a couple others a 14-24mm and a 24-70mm.
no, those are the only 3 in this video, same ones you mentioned
24 70 2.8 is also perfect on DX
Cool :)
Hey Ken, what are the issues with the Sigma's, particularly the 18-35 f1.8? I do not have any frame of reference other than the reviews I have read, so I was just curious as to your take on them. And btw,...I love my D500! Trying to build my lens triangle, and I really appreciate this video and your take on the trinity of lenses
Im a working Pro and Literally have this set up but with the Vr 2 70-200mm. You can look up my work PG/BauerGriffin. my Fx / backup body is a D3
Dont have a issue using fx lenses on dx, the issue I have is a 24mm fx is not a 24mm on dx and I want a 24mm (as an example) not a 1.5 crop factor which turns it into a 36mm. Thats the issue we dx users have, yes for tele its great but its under the tele range thats an issue.
I do own 17-55 AF-S, T 70-200 VC, 200-500 AF-S and I do agree with them being the trinity for D500.
But I don't agree with your view that Nikon doesn't need any more DX lenses. Of course I can use FX lenses and get great results, but if you compare... let's say... 35mm f/1.8 DX to 35mm f/1.8ED (FX), using FX lenses on a DX body has its disadvantages. Lens is unnecessarily bigger, heavier, and pricier if you compare an FX lens to a similar DX lens.
Yeah, I could use 24mm f/1.8 or f/1.4 to get 35mm(ish) angle of view on my D500 but if I wish there was a smaller, lighter, (and maybe cheaper) DX 24mm f/1.4~1.8 lens. You do own a Fuji system and their 23mm, don't you? Wouldn't it be great to have lens like that (ie: light, compact, good quality) to use with Nikon DX bodies?
I agree with you. Whilst FX lenses can be used with Nikon DX cameras it defeats the purpose of using a crop body, which for many people is to have a lighter kit. This is also one of the reasons why many folk are transitioning to the Fuji X system .... Fuji are making native APS-C sized lenses ; they are listening to the customer base. If Nikon ( and Canon ) continue to churn out just FX cameras & lenses they will crash & burn eventually.
I do have some hope for Nikon anyway, because their release of D500 shows that they've not abandoned DX altogether. Maybe we'll get some nice DX lenses in the future.
Sadly, I don't think they will. I think the D500 was produced to appease wildlife photographers who had been pleading with Nikon for years to give them something to follow on from the D300. I've seen nothing to indicate that Nikon believe in supporting the DX system ... at a prosumer level anyway.
I adquired the 24-70E ED VRII paired with Nikon D500 based on your inmmense knowledge and I have to tell you it is spot on. I want to ask you if you would recommend to switch from D500 to D850 or to the new Z7. I’m looking for the best overall camera( quality, resolution, FPS, future proof,etc) everything than you would look for on your next Nikon camera. Can you recommend any of those for a little bit of everything photography or stay with D500. Thanks so much for your videos and thank you for any profesional recomendations that you can give me.
I picked up an older Tamron 70-200 2.8 di sp macro for $450ish on ebay and I absolutely love it and grab it more than my Nikkor 105mm for general outdoor macro. My question is, how much better is the Nikkor 70-200mm 2.8 than this older Tamron?
Summary
Nikon 200-500 f/5.6
-70-200 f/2.8E FL- tamron 70 200 2.8 G2
Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8 DX
tamron 70 200 2.8 G2 😗😘😍
I appreciate the correction!
Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR Lens , Why did Apophasis cross this lens out. He was waiting 10 years for it. I also got it and the Nikon 17-55 f/2.8 DX
WELL WE COULD TRY THE
NIKON 200-400MM F4
TAMRON 70-200
NIKON 17-55 MM
I've just bought Nikon 17-55 2.8. oldschool, sturdy, heavy, reliable. Love it.
Hi @Theoria. At 5:22 you say that the 17-55 Nikkor is basically a 24-70 field of view. Sorry for the stupid question but why is that? Isn’t the 17-55 a DX lens on a DX body? I’m really sorry if this is a lame question. New to photography.. But I did buy the D500 AND the 17-55 after watching your videos and I’m loving them btw! :)
sabrabba: The 17mm - 55mm produces the same field of view as a 25.5mm - 82.5mm would do on a full-frame camera because of the "crop factor" which is 1.5 for Nikon DX cameras. You need to multiply the focal-length (or range of lengths for a zoom) of a lens by 1.5 to get it's "effective / equivalent" focal-length (i.e. the full-frame equivalent)......I hope that makes sense :-)
Good collection Ken. Thank
You. I'm a bird/nature enthusiast who's opted for the 300 PF + 1.4III TC on my D500, over the 200-500 - largely for its portability. I find myself frequently pondering how they stack up in terms of IQ however. Price tags aside, do you have a view on how those combos compare? Keep up the great vids. Cheers.
see steve perrys video comparing those two, hes the nature shooter guru :)
GREAT video as always. Was wondering. D810 or D500 . Which would you have if you had neither but a recently dead D700 being replaced by Insurance. Maybe their others have this dilemma. I have 16-35, 70-200 2.8, 100 2.8, 50 1.4
depends, if lands and portraits, D810………all else D500 fer shur :P
Does he ever mention the lens to his left by name or does he just assume we know what it is?
Ken Good Morning from Europe, I am a bit uncertain with one of the Trinities for the D500. The 200-500 for which Steve Perry said, comparing it with the 300 PF, that 3 out of 5 of the 200-500 had to be send back as having too much blur.....What is your opinion on that and also, how do you compare the 200-500 with the AF-S 300m f/4D ED-IF new, instead. And..look in your email. Indeed I do not know what I would have done without you. Many many thanks. Flora
Ken, who is the "Theoria Apophasis of the Canons"? Is there one?
Apart from the big 17-55, what would be your choice for street photography (prime or zoom)?
for what camera? D500? 18-35 G for certain very very LIGHTWEIGHT and fast, and great
Thanks! And, yes, D500. How about a prime? I'm thinking 20 or 24...
look at the sigma 30mm art 1.4, its beautiful
Hi ken... What nikon camera can you recommend as alternative to d850? An all around camera.... The d850 cost much for just a hobbiest like me.... I like the d500. But im a little worried of its performance for landscape and portraiture
Hi Ken Question please....I know you mentioned that the NEW Nikkor 70-200mm has a fantastic bokeh on a full Frame as expected but would I get still an AWESOME bokeh If I buy this lens and use on my D500 for portraits? Thanks mate!
if you could suggest lenses for concert photography, both for example & fx. Would be great, coz people are busy giving sales pitch for brands in RUclips unlike you.
would you do a comparison between the D500 and the D4. I know you are fond of both. haven't heard much about the D4 since you bought the D500. I own both on your recommendation. I guess wanting to know if I should sell the D4?
thx
Ha...now the Trinity is down to only one Nikon Lens! ;-)
How about a link to either a Canon or Nikon 500mm f/2.8 lens? The longest f2/8 lens I'm aware of is only 400mm. They're close to dirt cheep in manual focus compared to the AFS or AFS VR versions.
I've owned a Tamron 200-500 A31 Adaptall since 1995 and the auto-focus Tamron 200-500 SP-DI for a few years. Both good sharp lenses. The negative is the extended length at 500mm.
The 200-500 Nikon is on the list for my Antarctic trip in February 2017. Traveling light, so only three lenses presently going, Nikon 17-35, Nikon 28-70, and Nikon 80-200, all F2.8. Would prefer all manual focus as the AFS lenses use a lot of power when cold. I'd love to take the 15mm along, but too big for limited use, maybe next time.
Link for the 500mm f2.8 or was that a mis-speak?
antarctica ! :P i wasnt talking about the 500mm 2.8…that lens is titanic
Thanks.. :)
The only other photosnob that I have heard talk that FX lens on a DXcamera nonsense is Tony Northrup
Hi! Am I the only one worried about the 200-500mm not being WEATHER SEALED? it worries me much. (thinking about getting it)
I'd say after 3 months....yes.
RMG Wheels & Spokes Lab.: If it was fully weatherproof the price would be a lot higher so its a good deal for the money.
Ken, I've been using Nikon dslrs since the D1 came out. Never shot video though. What's the best source you know of for basics of shooting video with these? My problem is AF is continuously hunting. Thx
What do you think about the 19-300mm 3.5-5.6 on a d500. Is it good for somebody who is used to travel a lot?
Will the D500 Trinity need to be updated come August 2017 for some people?
Tamron has new G2 for 24-70mm f/2.8 coming soon
or is 24-70mm really not used?
'gigantic 220mm fisheye lens' at 1:04?
very rare huge lens now worth a fortune
Paolo, what Ken meant was 220 Degrees ~ Angle of View ~ of the 6mm Fisheye Nikkor
ok :D
How would the new Tamron 150-600 G2 compare to the Nikon 200-500 ?
Thank you for your videos. I am looking to get the Nikon 17-55mm. What is the difference between the Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S DX (about $1200), Nikon Nikkor AF-S 17-55mm f2.8 G ED SWM DX IF(about $600). Can I get the cheaper one and still be good if I am doing sports and wide angle. Thanks again for our honest videos.
same lens……. :) hehehe
Why do you always have to put the monitor on the desk? You alone is already too big for the lens FOV.
WHERE ARE THE TOP 5 AFFORDABLE (100-500 dollar range) LENS' FOR NIKON DSLR FOR THE PURPOSES OF *_SHOOTING VIDEO ONLY_*
can u do this for fuji lenses
Ken, B&H has a warning that the 17-55mm Nikkor will not work on a full frame camera? That's nonsense right?
total FING nonsense, who told you that and where??? ROFL
What about Sigma C 150-600mm f/5-.63 DG OS HSM instead the 200-500mm?
i dont mess with sigma "stuff"
Tell me about the trioplan 100mm 2.8 you use on your Nikon D500 and what about the adaptor if we bought one of eBay what's needed? We know nothing about adaptors.
the trioplan i have doesnt need an adapter, its nikon mount
Thanks, for the fast response and I found it on ebay.
Hi @theoria apophasis Ken, please answer me :) I will use D500 and 70-200 and 200- 500 with CPL
Polarizer filter on bright sun light. Do I follow Your suggestion anyway or that will be good enough to cover that blown? Huge thanks man
youre just adding negative comp, so no that wont change ultimate specular exposure :) you got apile of awesome and glass there
U get the new 70 200 ehhh?
thnx a lot
help me ...!
Nikon d500 or d4 for wildlife?
D500, easyyyy
Theoria Apophasis will d500 beat d4s ?
Without doubt..the D500...
What do you think of the Nikon P900?
not used it yet
Does anyone know what's the crop factor for a 16-80mm 2.8 on a D500 recording 4K?
X1.5
Theoria Apophasis Thank you. So I will be able to have 4K that looks like 24mm on a FX lens and FX body right?
What do u do with a pair...of nikon 200-500mm f5.6....????
2 ears, 2 boobs, 2…..U get it
lol..
What are the D7100 trinity lenses?
another DX sensor, same same :) , however SUCH expensive lenses for that camera….. 70 300 VR G…..
Love ur videos...damn!
Have you used the Sigma lenses? what about the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art Lens ? Is this not filling in a niche that no other lens in the market can do (its the only 1.8 zoom) or does it still "suck". also Sigma 150-600mm f5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary got this at €879 new versus 1.599 for the 200-500 nikon. So it got the job done at a lower price point it has some issues with locking on birds in flight, the image is "milky" but to be frank at that time and as a beginner I think the trade off was acceptable for the money I paid. facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10210555946602598&set=a.4437718668796.2178274.1464142538&type=3&theater is an example of what I shot on a D500 + the Sigma. (its anecdotal and has also had a lot of light-room editing to get to this point but I think its workable at almost half the price)
how do you rate the 200-400 f4 with the D500?
hate that lens to hell, both versions of it , haaaaate it
any reason(s)? price, sharpness, contrast, speed?
Don't jump off that cliff, Ken.
I don't understand why anyone would buy a DX lens period.
only ONE of those is a DX lens, and its incredible, and cheap used…..nothing touches, nothing
Theoria Apophasis yes i get that one, it's a badass DX lens, I basically meant in general, my thoughts are if someone ever wanted to upgrade to a full frame doesn't it make sense to only have full frame lenses?
i dont buy DX lenses of course, ….i only have like 4 DX lenses
$$$$$$$ - Not everyone is a working pro that can write off equipment. People have kids and other expenses...if you only had, say, $400 a year to put towards gear, would you go FX or DX? Also, FX bodies are worse for some purposes (wildlife where you crop most images heavily, for example. The lower pixel density means less detail.)
for a specific range that suits the crop factor
D500 + 200-500, and they said ' D300s is dead, birding photographers are a niche, if it comes it will not be cheap - NIKON DOESNT LISTEN ' ;)
300MM PF with TC gives better results than the 200-500mm
id never use a TC on a zoom
Theoria Apophasis i mean 300mm PF +TC resolve better and render better than 200_500 without TC
@theoria apophasis Ken, when I think of a Trinity set, I'm thinking ultra wide, normal zoom, tele-zoom. does Nikon make a good DX wide angle lens for the D500? I ask because I have no experience with Nikon & am looking to build a wedding kit, whether it's Nikon, Fuji or Canon. I don't care, as long as it works well. Thanks! 😁
Because the crop factor on the D500 you will want a DX specific Wide Angle Lens, you don't want a 14mm focal length acting like a 21mm. The AF-S DX 12-24mm f4G IF-ED is the best option for wide angle in my opinion, and Ken has posted the same. Avoid the AF-S DX 10-24mm F3.5-4.5..... It sounds nice have the extra range in focal length, but the distortion is much worse, to my eye the images are missing sharpness and color saturation in comparison. Side by side the 12-24 DX is much, much better for any of the Nikon DX series cameras D500, D7200, D7100, D7000, D5500, D3500, etc....
So the 12-24 DX lens is the equivalent of 18-36 on FF?
No, if you use a FX or Full Frame lens on a DX, you have to add 50% to your focal length because of the crop factor. Nikon has a very good FX Wide Angle lens that is 14-24mm in focal length, however if you use that lens on the D500 it will have a range of 21mm to 36mm. So for the wide angle lens you want a lens made for DX camera's to give you the correct focal equivalent.
The 12-24mm DX lens on a FX would act like a 8-16mm on the FX or full frame camera (if not used in crop mode), but will probably have some major issues with dark areas or vignetting. I have not tried to use this lens on any FX or Full Frame Camera so I can't speak to the specific results you would have. Most likely your camera will recognize the lens and automatically put your camera into crop mode from what I have read, thus reducing the area of the camera sensor being used to that of a DX camera. I hope that makes sense.
Jason Rehder OK... so it's the equivalent to 18-36. that sounds good. So a good wedding kit would be 12-24, 17-55 + 70-200?
for the D500, that sounds like a very good start and would cover all of the normal or expected shots for a wedding
Steve Perry shoots with the 600mm f4 a lot. Too bad it costs as much as a car.
nahhh, great used ones cost about $6500
Fresnel is pronounced FRUH-NEL.
actually both are ok
Actually the other pronunciation is FRAY-NEL...I'm not trying to be a dick, (I LOVE YOUR VIDEOS) and currently OD-ing on them!! I have also commented on your use of the word Absurd..you say ABZURD, with a "Z". I'm just commenting, not being mean. I am really glad I discovered your videos, I really think you truly understand The secrets of Magnetism and light, and photography! I have subscribed and will be sending you a Christmas present!...CASH!
дорогонах
Cant stand this guy. Tried to watch a few of his videos. All he brags on about is how much equipment he owns. Or this particular one that he has shot with every lens going. Good for him. But stop bragging
Paul James he knows his shit
That’s all that counts