The beard, glasses and nodding sold it for me -- let's see Dan try to explain how he knew when to point up exactly when the graphic passed over his head ;)
I also wonder, but I think it doesn't matter. The effect is the same, but socially we offer faith as a figleaf to the devout. Like until recently I believed most Christians' hearts were in the right place but they were misled, where those using them in bad faith were the true evildoers. Now I think that if the evil is getting done you have to simply stop it and not concern yourself with the relative guilt of the doers.
Apologists: This new amaizing, unheared, unexpected, forged or nor forget it's dosen't matter because proves the bible is true!!! Also the Bible: Nothing new under the sun, if is new then means is fake
@ That isn’t proof, you claimed people have to lie to be an apologist Can you objectively prove they are lying? You do realize according to tradition the whole book of Isaiah is believed to be written by Isaiah, how in the world can you accuse someone of lying if they are telling you the truth what their tradition believes in? Tell me who is exactly lying here
@lysanamcmillan7972 no, it's not. No one uses "fit" to just refer to their shirt. "Fit" is an abbreviated "outfit" which is all articles of clothing considered as a whole. If you're going to tell people how to use language, at least be right.
Dan McClellan, confusing future internet historians: "You guys claim Dan always shot his videos in a regular, non-reversed fashion. But look, that shirt is clearly reversed! The Superman S is backwards!" "Ah, but that particular Superman is a variant with a backwards S." "Ridiculous."
One thing I've learned from watching Dan's videos: every time an apologetics video has that pounding pulse-quickening orchestral music, with a voiceover like a movie trailer announcer... it's lying.
Basically New York existing proves Spider-Man argument that I and many others bring up when Dan critiques historical artifact proves entire bible argument that apologists promote.
Can we stop with reaction videos where people just waggle their finger at the other video? I hope that trend goes away, it's so lazy. Yes, I get it, you agree. But you're not adding to the discussion. Back on topic, I love how the retort is "this event has never really been questioned by scholars because we have other sources to back it up." Huh. You mean biblical stories that incorporate historical events sometimes name-drop actual historical events? Crazy! 100% historicity confirmed! /s
@@SpaveFrostKingDoes it claim to be based off a true story? If so can you provide proof for it ? Also please provide me peer reviewed papers to confirm this also
I love it when content creators add nothing of value to the content they are reacting to. Dan was essentially reacting to the original video since guy with the hat added nothing of substance
I was listening to a podcast by Dr Robert M Price in which he said that it appears that who ever wrote Nehemiah was writing it from memory after the Diaspora..
Nothing against that creator specifically, but it drives me nuts the way that people respond to videos with smiles, pointing, and real dramatic shock. It’s like, what’s the deal?
Why the desparation to make everything "true?" Very little is true in the bible and what is true is regarding places and people rather than events. I wish they'd just "worship" what they want and shut the hell up.
I always find it comical when youtubers just piggyback off some different video without really doing any work to produce it. Apologists do it often. How lazy can you be and how can anyone take them seriously?
@mdm123196 he doesn't. He might have put a lot of work into getting his education, but his videos are the exact kind of low effort react content that you are critical of.
@Christian-l8k you haven't watched enough of his content if that's what you think. A massive portion of his content most Christians would not even know are issues. Listen to his podcast. The fact is, most Christian content creators don't know enough about the bible to make the content they make. The vadte majority of them are being intellectually dishonest or arw just downright ignorant to scholarship.
@@mdm123196 we're talking about the effort he puts into his videos, not his scholarship. His videos are low effort, nothing more than Christian react content. The only reason you don't see it is because he doesn't react to videos he agrees with and point up at the spliced in video like the other guy from this video.
So, knowing that this guy totally misunderstood the facts here, yet points up at the failed video, demonstrates how content creators will use false data to push their beliefs. And, of course, the already biased will just take all this as "facts" when it isn't. They want it to be "true", therefore will not put it to the test, which in this case, would show it to be false. So rather than this guy in the hat "proving something", he just managed to make a fool out of himself.
I still enjoy Dan's content, but please can you level out audio levels between clips? Turning up my speakers to hear Dan speak makes the other clips too loud and painful to hear.
Just shows to go ya again, how little Biblical fundamentalists really know about their own book they try to force on everyone else in their blind ignorance. Not all believers but the most loud mouth ones are!
Dan, can you touch on the claim that Cyrus' name is recorded in Isaiah as the one to free the Israelites? I know many apologists that rely on that more than the Cyrus cylinder. Isa 45:1. Is this a multi author writing or after the fact recorded like Daniel?
Isaiah has perhaps three authors (or more)-the original Isaiah text (chapters 1-39), Deutero-Isaiah (chapters 40-55) written during/after the Exile, and Trito-Isaiah (chapters 56-66) written definitely after the return from Exile. Isaiah 45:1 is comfortably within Deutero-Isaiah, so it’s quite likely that the prophecy was fulfilled before it was made (if you understand my meaning).
Wait a sec, at 0:34 you say: “The majority of scholars have always accepted the historicity of the story of Cyrus allowing the Judahites to return home and build their temple.” But at 1:25 you say that “…the contents of the Cyrus Cylinder are entirely about the land of Babylon and never once mention any decree about any captives returning to a homeland and rebuilding their temple.” So are you just pointing out that even tho those events happened (as corroborated by Herodotus and Xenophon [0:53]), it’s the Cyrus Cylinder that doesn’t mention them? Is that what you wanted to point out with that? I find that kind of strange. It’s like saying: “Yes those events happened, but he’s wrong to use the Cyrus Cylinder as support that it happened.” The part that matters is whether it happened or not, isn’t it? So if the Cylinder doesn’t say it happened but there is other evidence to support that it did (which even you agree on), then that means that both of you are in agreement about what happened. You’re not really refuting his overall point there.
You know what the class to teach is ? No? I’ll tell you… how to research religious claims on the Internet Maybe even have like a pub med for the Bible maybe there is one I don’t know man I just work here
I get my my hair cut at a barbershop where the barber and his customers are not particularly well-educated, and so are, of course, devout Christians. I want so badly to debate them in their religious beliefs, and refute their simple-minded claims. But then I'm always reminded of the old adadge, "Never piss off your waiter or your barber". And so, I keep my mouth shut and suffer in silence, taking comfort in the fact that it'll end soon. It's the reason I go when I know he has the least number of customers. 🤣
@@ldr540 Ty for the kind words. And yes, those who actually care about the scholarship of the Bible tend to sub to and follow channels such as Dan's. But you'd be surprised at how many religious apologists troll these channels, in a futile attempt to cast aspersions on the scholarship.
@@Noneya5555 I am as shocked as you are by the existence of Christian apologists, Christian Nationalists, and Right Wing Authoritarians in the current year. I am still in mourning over the election of Trump, as I trust you are as my fellow intellectual. When will we be free of the lesser minds holding us down?
So the ugaritic el and sumerian anu where oponents of ahura mazda right? If people with different original creators have to oppose, this manicheism is not compatible with Romerism shared origins. it is like the sun god ra of egypt and the sun godess arinna of the hittites? The manipulators have to be those who deny shared origins of humanity? This proves Herodotus is right, if we add Judeans' priets in exile claim that humanity male and female are created as divine images? 😇
and yet he does so because his followers requested. Should he ignore their requests just to appease you by yourself? Also, seems like a shallow way to determine who to listen to.
@Bobjdobbs I've never seen his followers asking what he's wearing because he always makes a point to tell them. It used to be the first thing he would talk about and only recently has he moved it to the end of the videos. My point is that if you have actually valuable spiritual knowledge you won't dilute it with drivel about the clothing you wear.
@ LMAO! So because you haven’t seen it it didn’t happen? And because you feel it is drivel, it undermines his consensus with academia? Wow, you really are a strange little person. It is adorable how you think you believe your arbitrary rules hold any weight in the real world. So funny! I will give you one thing. Your ad hominem is one of the most ridiculous and unhinged I have ever seen. So there is that. Congrats, I guess? And let’s be clear: this channel is not about spiritual knowledge. It is about the academic study of the Bible. Spiritual knowledge is subjective and would fall under theology, a separate branch of study, one Dan rarely discusses, beyond where it overlaps with his own. Or do you not know the difference between theology and academic biblical studies?
@@Christian-l8k It happened. You have to go back a few years to see it. But what a weird ad hominem to choose: one’s clothes. Are you typically this close minded and prejudiced? And for the record? Dan is not discussing anything spiritual. That is theology. Dan uses his channel for academic biblical scholarship. Are you unaware of the difference? I can explain it for you.
@@Christian-l8k You have to go back a year or two, but it’s there. But what a weird ad hominem to choose: one’s clothing. How judgmental and prejudicial of you. For the record, Dan never discusses spiritual knowledge. He is an academic biblical scholar, not a theologian. Do you really not understand that?
It’s got to be a heavy load to have to debunk multiple layers of fantasy at once. Also, Superman is the worst superhero Keep up the good work, if you want. I’m not the boss of you.
Not sure what the relevance is to this video, but Dan discusses both in his video "Earliest Figures from the Bible Attested by the Archaeological Evidence?"
@@Nudnik1 I've never heard anyone claim that Israel never existed. I have heard people claim that a unified kingdom of Judah and Israel under Solomon that included much more Canaanite lands didn't exist as depicted, because there's no evidence that it ever got that big, but even those people don't say Israel never existed.
The more I watch Dan's reaction videos, the less respect I have for the intelligence and honesty of Abrahamic monotheist apologists. Their blind acceptance and eager dissemination of both misinformation and disinformation are both disturbing and telling. The fact that many of them support and voted for a man like Trump tells me all I need to know. Smh...
@@roytee3127 No, believe he's referring to the person Dan replied to. Dan actually adds significant substantive commentary. The creator he was responding to just said "here's a cool video" and then played another person's video while nodding his head and pointing every now and then. Which is really just intellectual thievery, at least as much as that can be said of pretty unintellectual content.
I don't know what energy pointing up and smiling smugly is giving off, but I know I'm having an allergic reaction to it.
The beard, glasses and nodding sold it for me -- let's see Dan try to explain how he knew when to point up exactly when the graphic passed over his head ;)
I think he is going for that Flat-Earther vibe.
@@jman5599 * nodding * * pointing to your comment * * smirk, then mild head shake *
it's irritating radiation
I wonder how many of these apologists are lying, and are just repeating sensationalist nonsense for clicks, and how many of them actually believe it?
It's a job requirement.
They believe this crap. It's cognitive dissonance. We have only to look at current events to see utter disregard for facts.
I also wonder, but I think it doesn't matter. The effect is the same, but socially we offer faith as a figleaf to the devout. Like until recently I believed most Christians' hearts were in the right place but they were misled, where those using them in bad faith were the true evildoers. Now I think that if the evil is getting done you have to simply stop it and not concern yourself with the relative guilt of the doers.
The clicks rule!
Apologists: This new amaizing, unheared, unexpected, forged or nor forget it's dosen't matter because proves the bible is true!!!
Also the Bible: Nothing new under the sun, if is new then means is fake
Keep up the good work Dan. Love your stuff!
I can't say that you have to lie to be an apologist, even to yourself, but they sure seem to do it a lot.
Prove it
@@xplicitgoofy1015 😄
@ That isn’t proof, you claimed people have to lie to be an apologist
Can you objectively prove they are lying? You do realize according to tradition the whole book of Isaiah is believed to be written by Isaiah, how in the world can you accuse someone of lying if they are telling you the truth what their tradition believes in?
Tell me who is exactly lying here
@xplicitgoofy1015 Can you read or comprehend what you read?
Is it me, or does the fit for this video match the content being discussed perfectly?
I was just thinking the same thing!
A tshirt is not a fit
@Christian-l8k don't be a fuddy duddy
@@Christian-l8k That is the local slang for it. Relax.
@lysanamcmillan7972 no, it's not. No one uses "fit" to just refer to their shirt. "Fit" is an abbreviated "outfit" which is all articles of clothing considered as a whole. If you're going to tell people how to use language, at least be right.
Dan McClellan, confusing future internet historians: "You guys claim Dan always shot his videos in a regular, non-reversed fashion. But look, that shirt is clearly reversed! The Superman S is backwards!" "Ah, but that particular Superman is a variant with a backwards S." "Ridiculous."
He's wearing his shirt inside out and back to front therefore backwards S.
Thanks Dan. ❤
One thing I've learned from watching Dan's videos: every time an apologetics video has that pounding pulse-quickening orchestral music, with a voiceover like a movie trailer announcer... it's lying.
So, every apologetics video.
Bizarro is such a fitting fit for this video 😂, thank you, Dan, for your clarity.
❤❤❤❤❤❤thanks Dan!!
Any TikToker who points up at footage, irrespective of the content, should have their account deleted.
Thank you.
Basically New York existing proves Spider-Man argument that I and many others bring up when Dan critiques historical artifact proves entire bible argument that apologists promote.
One important difference being that I wish Spider-Man was really real.
Wonderful example
Does spider man claim to be based off a true story ?
@xplicitgoofy1015 Abraham was the original Stan Lee. That's why you see him making so many cameos in later books.
How can it be nonsense? He pointed up and nodded, that's how you know it's true!
And that’s still taught in a lot of seminaries today. Thanks for the correction.
The guy's hat says, "Christ like." 😂 i knew it was going to be iffy.
Can we stop with reaction videos where people just waggle their finger at the other video? I hope that trend goes away, it's so lazy. Yes, I get it, you agree. But you're not adding to the discussion.
Back on topic, I love how the retort is "this event has never really been questioned by scholars because we have other sources to back it up." Huh. You mean biblical stories that incorporate historical events sometimes name-drop actual historical events? Crazy! 100% historicity confirmed! /s
Wow, some things in the Bible actually happened 😱
So did some things in Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter 😄
@NWPaul72 That movie is 100% historically accurate. We got records Lincoln existed
@@SpaveFrostKingDoes it claim to be based off a true story? If so can you provide proof for it ? Also please provide me peer reviewed papers to confirm this also
I love it when content creators add nothing of value to the content they are reacting to. Dan was essentially reacting to the original video since guy with the hat added nothing of substance
If you put the universe in a tube, it would be a really long tube.
I was listening to a podcast by Dr Robert M Price in which he said that it appears that who ever wrote
Nehemiah was writing it from memory after the Diaspora..
Shouldn't it be, The 'fit for this video has NOT been Bizarro? 😅
the hat he wears kills me
"Christlike" in death metal font slaps
@giromide
Full fledged goofball.
The last line of 32 is missing. Apparently the missing line says, ""I gathered all their inhabitants and returned to them their dwellings."
I want that shirt. LOL
Perhaps a small point, but wouldn't a thing first need to be proved before it can be proved again?
Nothing against that creator specifically, but it drives me nuts the way that people respond to videos with smiles, pointing, and real dramatic shock. It’s like, what’s the deal?
Smug laziness
Dan Xenophon is a superhero ! Bizorro is his original costume ❤
Why the desparation to make everything "true?" Very little is true in the bible and what is true is regarding places and people rather than events. I wish they'd just "worship" what they want and shut the hell up.
because it's not about truth, it's about structuring power and identity
The authority of Christian doctrine rests not on its merit, but on the like-it-or-not historical truth of certain events.
@@roytee3127 or the perception that's it "like it or not" true.
I always find it comical when youtubers just piggyback off some different video without really doing any work to produce it. Apologists do it often. How lazy can you be and how can anyone take them seriously?
Bro don't come at Dan like that
@Christian-l8k i wasn't talking about Dan. I was talking about the creator he was critical of. Dan obviously puts a lot of work into his videos.
@mdm123196 he doesn't. He might have put a lot of work into getting his education, but his videos are the exact kind of low effort react content that you are critical of.
@Christian-l8k you haven't watched enough of his content if that's what you think. A massive portion of his content most Christians would not even know are issues. Listen to his podcast. The fact is, most Christian content creators don't know enough about the bible to make the content they make. The vadte majority of them are being intellectually dishonest or arw just downright ignorant to scholarship.
@@mdm123196 we're talking about the effort he puts into his videos, not his scholarship. His videos are low effort, nothing more than Christian react content. The only reason you don't see it is because he doesn't react to videos he agrees with and point up at the spliced in video like the other guy from this video.
Dan , this guys editing is really fast so .... Maybe he's right ?
"Cyrus is magic, a whole lot of magic." Points if you get the reference.
How does that guy's gigantic ego fit into that "Christ Like" hat?
So, knowing that this guy totally misunderstood the facts here, yet points up at the failed video, demonstrates how content creators will use false data to push their beliefs. And, of course, the already biased will just take all this as "facts" when it isn't. They want it to be "true", therefore will not put it to the test, which in this case, would show it to be false.
So rather than this guy in the hat "proving something", he just managed to make a fool out of himself.
I still enjoy Dan's content, but please can you level out audio levels between clips? Turning up my speakers to hear Dan speak makes the other clips too loud and painful to hear.
Just shows to go ya again, how little Biblical fundamentalists really know about their own book they try to force on everyone else in their blind ignorance. Not all believers but the most loud mouth ones are!
☃️
Dan, can you touch on the claim that Cyrus' name is recorded in Isaiah as the one to free the Israelites? I know many apologists that rely on that more than the Cyrus cylinder. Isa 45:1.
Is this a multi author writing or after the fact recorded like Daniel?
Isaiah has perhaps three authors (or more)-the original Isaiah text (chapters 1-39), Deutero-Isaiah (chapters 40-55) written during/after the Exile, and Trito-Isaiah (chapters 56-66) written definitely after the return from Exile. Isaiah 45:1 is comfortably within Deutero-Isaiah, so it’s quite likely that the prophecy was fulfilled before it was made (if you understand my meaning).
@DneilB007 is that breakdown based on writing style analysis, or something else?
Wait a sec, at 0:34 you say: “The majority of scholars have always accepted the historicity of the story of Cyrus allowing the Judahites to return home and build their temple.”
But at 1:25 you say that “…the contents of the Cyrus Cylinder are entirely about the land of Babylon and never once mention any decree about any captives returning to a homeland and rebuilding their temple.”
So are you just pointing out that even tho those events happened (as corroborated by Herodotus and Xenophon [0:53]), it’s the Cyrus Cylinder that doesn’t mention them? Is that what you wanted to point out with that? I find that kind of strange.
It’s like saying: “Yes those events happened, but he’s wrong to use the Cyrus Cylinder as support that it happened.” The part that matters is whether it happened or not, isn’t it? So if the Cylinder doesn’t say it happened but there is other evidence to support that it did (which even you agree on), then that means that both of you are in agreement about what happened. You’re not really refuting his overall point there.
Are TikTok videos just stealing clips from other people and sitting there pointing?
Wait, so the OP's job was to... point (as in _literaly point_ )at another person's video without adding anything else to it?
That is insanely common on tiktok
@@Scupple Isn't that, I dunno, breaking a copyright? You're not even doing anything to make it fall under Fair Use?
You know what the class to teach is ? No? I’ll tell you… how to research religious claims on the Internet
Maybe even have like a pub med for the Bible maybe there is one I don’t know man I just work here
The Cyrus Cylinder’s role in human rights isn’t just from one fake translation. The idea goes back centuries or even millennia.
All right, let's see it. *waits for your proof*
Dan is home
DM, the great debunker!
The bizarro world of evangenital apolegetics...
But even Christ is the Greek Version of the Messiah as Christian is Greek of the followers of Christ. Prof X you are Wrong on this one.
Is it just me or has apologetic tiktok become nothing but low-effort react content?
I know, I'm sick of seeing Dan's content too
I get my my hair cut at a barbershop where the barber and his customers are not particularly well-educated, and so are, of course, devout Christians.
I want so badly to debate them in their religious beliefs, and refute their simple-minded claims. But then I'm always reminded of the old adadge, "Never piss off your waiter or your barber".
And so, I keep my mouth shut and suffer in silence, taking comfort in the fact that it'll end soon. It's the reason I go when I know he has the least number of customers. 🤣
You sound very intelligent and complex-minded. I've noticed that Dan tends to attract the super-intelligent among us.
@@ldr540 Ty for the kind words. And yes, those who actually care about the scholarship of the Bible tend to sub to and follow channels such as Dan's.
But you'd be surprised at how many religious apologists troll these channels, in a futile attempt to cast aspersions on the scholarship.
@@Noneya5555 I am as shocked as you are by the existence of Christian apologists, Christian Nationalists, and Right Wing Authoritarians in the current year. I am still in mourning over the election of Trump, as I trust you are as my fellow intellectual. When will we be free of the lesser minds holding us down?
So the ugaritic el and sumerian anu where oponents of ahura mazda right? If people with different original creators have to oppose, this manicheism is not compatible with Romerism shared origins. it is like the sun god ra of egypt and the sun godess arinna of the hittites? The manipulators have to be those who deny shared origins of humanity?
This proves Herodotus is right, if we add Judeans' priets in exile claim that humanity male and female are created as divine images? 😇
What does your post have to do with the content of the video. It that your point, type nonsense and see if someone reacts?
The Chrsitian content creators that actually teach me worthwhile things never waste time calling attention to their clothes.
and yet he does so because his followers requested. Should he ignore their requests just to appease you by yourself?
Also, seems like a shallow way to determine who to listen to.
@Bobjdobbs I've never seen his followers asking what he's wearing because he always makes a point to tell them. It used to be the first thing he would talk about and only recently has he moved it to the end of the videos. My point is that if you have actually valuable spiritual knowledge you won't dilute it with drivel about the clothing you wear.
@ LMAO! So because you haven’t seen it it didn’t happen? And because you feel it is drivel, it undermines his consensus with academia? Wow, you really are a strange little person. It is adorable how you think you believe your arbitrary rules hold any weight in the real world. So funny!
I will give you one thing. Your ad hominem is one of the most ridiculous and unhinged I have ever seen. So there is that. Congrats, I guess?
And let’s be clear: this channel is not about spiritual knowledge. It is about the academic study of the Bible. Spiritual knowledge is subjective and would fall under theology, a separate branch of study, one Dan rarely discusses, beyond where it overlaps with his own. Or do you not know the difference between theology and academic biblical studies?
@@Christian-l8k It happened. You have to go back a few years to see it. But what a weird ad hominem to choose: one’s clothes. Are you typically this close minded and prejudiced?
And for the record? Dan is not discussing anything spiritual. That is theology. Dan uses his channel for academic biblical scholarship. Are you unaware of the difference? I can explain it for you.
@@Christian-l8k You have to go back a year or two, but it’s there. But what a weird ad hominem to choose: one’s clothing. How judgmental and prejudicial of you.
For the record, Dan never discusses spiritual knowledge. He is an academic biblical scholar, not a theologian. Do you really not understand that?
There are over 160 scripture i believe on or about lying youtuber Christians should stop spreading them
It’s got to be a heavy load to have to debunk multiple layers of fantasy at once.
Also, Superman is the worst superhero
Keep up the good work, if you want. I’m not the boss of you.
Menespeth Stele Bronze age Egypt 1200bce says Israel.
Tel Dan Stele 9 th century BCE say Israel
Not sure what the relevance is to this video, but Dan discusses both in his video "Earliest Figures from the Bible Attested by the Archaeological Evidence?"
@johnmcgimpsey1825 for those who claim Israel never existed....
@@Nudnik1 I've never heard anyone claim that Israel never existed. I have heard people claim that a unified kingdom of Judah and Israel under Solomon that included much more Canaanite lands didn't exist as depicted, because there's no evidence that it ever got that big, but even those people don't say Israel never existed.
The more I watch Dan's reaction videos, the less respect I have for the intelligence and honesty of Abrahamic monotheist apologists.
Their blind acceptance and eager dissemination of both misinformation and disinformation are both disturbing and telling.
The fact that many of them support and voted for a man like Trump tells me all I need to know. Smh...
On an unrelated note: whatʼs with those guys who basically just play other peopleʼs material and point finger on it?
Monetization abuse, at least when they do it on YT and Twitch.
Are you complaining about Dan debunking lies on the internet?
The world needs more of it.
@@roytee3127 No, believe he's referring to the person Dan replied to. Dan actually adds significant substantive commentary. The creator he was responding to just said "here's a cool video" and then played another person's video while nodding his head and pointing every now and then. Which is really just intellectual thievery, at least as much as that can be said of pretty unintellectual content.
@@roytee3127 Of course not! I’m talking about the guy in the baseball cap. All he does is play another guy’s video.
@@roytee3127 No, _the video he's debunking_ is an example of what was referred to.