So he RESPONDED... | Tower World
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 сен 2024
- Eclipse made a response to our original video, so I decided to address this myself. I would really appreciate it if you watched the entire video to see how I refute the points he tried to make.
DISCORD | / discord
TOWER WORLD | www.roblox.com...
Eclipses video | • These Developers HORRI...
Our original responce | • Is Tower World A SCAM!... 
Игры
Ok but can you kill 8 snowmans in Tower World? Yea i dont think so
And kill yeti
@@rotihut931 wait... do you think blox fruit will eventually make it so you can kill 8 yeti
point taken
you're telling me i paid 50 robux and i still can't kill 8 snowmans?!?!?!?
Thats actually kinds of funny
Gonna be honest this comment section is just black and white, the one side is the eclipse fans and the others are the tw fans, that’s it. It’s ether the one or the other. No in betweens.
There is some in-betweens but since it’s not a popular side of the argument you won’t see them in the top comments
@@yangliu6901 Ah so that’s why I only see comments that are only on one side or the other.
Ngl getting in one side just complicates things in life for no reason
You forgot people who are watching the “drama” with popcorn in their hands lol
eclipse fans are opps 😤💯
You’re both making absolutely good points and both horrible points but what’s really happening is that you guys keep misunderstanding each other honestly at this point it would be much much much more better if you guys just added each other on discord and talk it out instead of being childish/ milking this by making videos back and forth until one of you just give up on responding.
True, you are 100% correct.
he’s true chat
Absolutely true however i belive some of the "eclipse misunderstanding" is him just plainly lying and spinning it onto eclipse pretending like them being angry and making snarky comments had a bigger meaning
1000%
@@pigit7526 give an example
You can't really blame Eclipse for flaming a writer who - to the public eye, has done no visible work.
Eclipse is viewing this as an outsider - you, have insider knowledge. Thus you know what the writer has been cooking and what is planned. Eclipse does not know these things, to him the writer has been sitting around doing nothing as no story has been including in the game so far.
To Eclipse and many other outsiders who don't possess this info, the writer may aswell not be being paid - because Eclipse doesn't know that you wanted to put the game out in Alpha with the gameplay before adding story elements later down the line.
And, on the point of the writing helping plan out levels the job description "writer" is not the job description "level designer" - so Eclipse had no way of knowing that the writer oversaw the level design.
So I believe it's unfair that you're being so harsh on this point, as he simply isn't you, he simply cannot know what your plans for the game are.
Not to devalue your points, but this one struck me weirdly, the man isn't omniscient.
EDIT: Bro says later "YOU. DO NOT. HAVE INSIGHT. On how our development process works."
Pardon the language but.. If that's the case then why are you getting on his ass about him not having the fucking Six Eyes from JJK to see that your writer is doing stuff that no-one knows about besides you and other members of staff and maybe some people invested in the game who aren't staff?
Again, other than this your responses are much better than the original response video your staff member mostly made to the Eclipse stuff.
Yea, also he doesn't dive into why there are so many devs in the first place as well, just that some devs fill in for others sometimes
I think he is getting mad about him not having insight on their development processes are because he is saying things that would create the assumption he does. In other words, he says things that would require him to actually know more information.
He says the writer probably doesn't do anything, which is fair but he could've thought about it more. Kind of like the argument, if death bricks don't kill you then why are they there. If a writer doesn't have anything to do with the gameplay, then why is he there.
I think this argument justifies how an outsider could realise the significance of a seemingly useless member of a development team. Clearly, they must be valued in some way or the other. He didn't have to sound as harsh as he did, BUT he honestly, and I really mean this, sounds like this always and was completely calm throughout the vast majority of the other parts of the video. It's just his natural tone, so when he is a bit more mad, he sounds a lot more mad.
Also, FrancoJ did mention that learning multiple skillsets to save money on hiring would be time consuming and not as high quality as getting people who dedicated years of time into learning the skillset they offer.
Thanks for reading :D
It doesnt matter that Eclipse has no clue what the writer is for because "he doesnt have insight". Eclipse doesnt need to comment on staff to review a game, I dont know which of Eclipse's videos talks about the staff or if its both of them, but if its just his reaction to the devs reaction, it sounds less like he is talking about the staff because he finds an actual problem with some of them getting paid because he doesnt see them doing anything, and more like he is being salty.
TLDR: The staff shouldnt matter to Eclipse for a review of a game unless they are explicitly untrustworthy and could not possibly provide anything for the future of the game, especially when its for an alpha, although this could just be me being delusional so if it sounds like that just ignore me or something idk
No, Eclipse CAN be blamed for flaming a writer, if he has no insider knowledge on what the writer's job or contributions are / will be, then he shouldn't attack the writer based on the assumption that he's not contributing meaningfully to the game, especially saying "they are not a valuable member of the payroll" which is quite insulting to anyone pouring time, care and effort into a game. The games current lack of story / writing Eclipse COULD have critiqued more, but instead decided to personally attack the writer himself's apparent lack of contribution which Eclipse has little to no insight about.
@@cCheesie He didn't attack the writer (As far as I know), he asked what the point of paying a writer is at all if no work is done thus far - and then he stated they aren't valuable if they're doing no work.
Never before now has Eclipse had ANY knowledge they planned to make this a story driven game, so a "writer" is useless.
Yes Eclipse can be partially BLAMED for not sitting down and thinking "Hmmm, well maybe they have something in progress", but a counter-point to that is it's never stated to him that they have a story in the works. Having a writer for an outsider POV like his is just objectively silly. The easiest conclusion is "What are they paying this dude for, he's doing nothing." not "Well clearly they must have some complex story behind the scenes and just decided to push the gameplay out first."
I don't love Eclipse but Franco's point on this specific thing about the writer being valuable is just silly, to my knowledge Eclipse has no way of knowing that the game is going to be heavily story driven, as that is not included in the paid alpha.
the reaction to the reaction to the reaction
wait for the reaction to the reaction to the reaction to the reaction
@@abasicguy just wait until the reaction to the reaction to the reaction to the reaction the reaction
@@fbarb1134 im personally waiting for the reaction to the reaction to the reaction to the reaction to the reaction to the reaction but you do you
@@NotPhotosynthetical yall are lame. im waiting for the reaction to the reaction to the reaction to the reaction to the reaction to the reaction to the reaction.
@@unknown_unknown749 you should also wait for the reaction to the reaction to the reaction to the reaction to the reaction to the reaction to the reaction to the reaction.
At this point just kiss eachother imo
this is not an enemy to lovers story
@@Xirken make it into one
@@Xirkennot yet😏
@@Xirken we just arent at that arc yet!
@@XirkenI think they got possessed by wattpad
Making a game is like making a *bowl,* Just as a *bowl* requires careful planning, design, and execution, so does a game. Both require a clear vision of the final product. You need to determine the desired outcome or goal. For a *bowl,* it might be its size, shape, or material. For a game, it’s the gameplay, mechanics, and story. Both involve creating a blueprint or plan. A *bowl’s* design might include its dimensions, patterns, and functionality. A game’s design includes its levels, and rules. Both require skill and precision. A potter shapes the clay to create the *bowl.* A game developer codes the mechanics and builds the world. Both need to be tested and refined. A *bowl* might need to be fired to ensure its strength and durability. A game needs to be playtested to identify bugs and balance issues.
In essence, both making a *bowl* and making a game involve a creative process that requires careful planning, design, execution, and testing to achieve a desired outcome.
my name has bowl in it (in yt)
@@bowlsfunstuff951 I eat bowls.
i shatter bowls
I go to Super Bowl with bowls
@@theguyunderwater yummers
Add kill 8 snowmans to Tower World and I give it a shot.
Honestly, from what I am hearing, good arguments.
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
69 likes 💀
Franco, as a developer myself, I have a question I'd like to ask. If you made it payed access to help earn money to pay for your developers to increase the overall quality, why did you do it in the first place? By doing so, you have disabled premium payouts, which almost guaranteed would be making you more money. And as eclipse said, you could've also just put a donation board. In this way, you could be getting more players and also a lot more money (potentially). I know it's in alpha, but if the overall concern is money, wouldn't you be better off the other way?
I develop some stuff too sometimes and I completely forgot that premium even existed
I feel like the reason they do this is because these are the standard predatory roblox alpha game traditions aka "keep it paid acces untill people stop buying and then make it free" pretty much once people stop buying "release" the game do let me know if thats wrong since im not too aware of how roblox game monetization is done
These mfs truly have genius marketing dont they?
@@pigit7526 That technically is something you can do, but that's usually not the case
They literally address this in the video. He talks about how the game being money in its current state is seen as the “donation” itself, and as a reward for supporting the development you get access to early builds of the game.
The response is pretty good except for the fact you mentioned that he didn't give valid criticism. He gave PLENTLY of actual criticism
He did, in fact, he even acknowledged it and made changes to the game like the lack on indication of how to go back to a checkpoint and the zipline problem
@@eduardomontenegro8209 Yeah but he said that he gave no valid criticism without inferring that that point was specifically meant for that section of the video, therefore making it sound like it was meant for the whole video.
@@CoconutREAL111idk why ur sympathizing with a guy WHOS KNOWN FOR GIVING BAD UNSUPPORTED REVIEWS. Hes like that one game journalist who gave cuphead a bad review cause he couldn’t get past the tutorial.
@@Aleph-Ayin That's your opinion, for me I like eclipse and enjoy his content. I agree that he makes some mistakes from time to time but everyone does
yeah something tower world could work on is a tutorial for beginners on basic roblox obby movement like wraps or small block jumps rather than just the unique mechanics
You skipped the part where your writer said that you guys had zero game passes. Eclipse showed that there were 2 purchasable game passes currently
Yeah that would ruin the whole paid acces thing which would break his arguments cant have that!
I agreed, I feel like the "trust me bro" statement is gonna be a problem with this game's downfall too. As fact many roblox developers usually run away with the money, when they clearly said they "promise" they're gonna finish their games. But let's just see what happens next with these two sides. Honestly, I won't play their game, I just feel like this is just a scam at end of the day.
Now that’s very suspicious of them
The buddy rope is just a gimmick with friends and 2x bits just helps you if you want to get some cosmetics faster its not that crazy and these are not very profitable
@@Arclife-kj8nw I'm a guy who is studying animation and scripting, and I've made solo project games. I think that the developers are just frustrated with people who say the game is a scam. I can see that these devs are open with the community and provide good content. You cannot scam someone with a product that is this good. Game development is expensive, and they can't keep the project going without money, so they gave us the game for 50 Robux to show that they are working on it and that it's not a scam. And as for the "trust me, bro" argument, it applies to all games, they can close at any time or stop updating. But this usually happens with free games, not Alpha or Beta games. Their creators typically work hard to give us the product we deserve. :)
Not gonna lie, the biggest anti-advertisement wasn't even an eclipse review but the writer's response. From Eclipse's video I got a rather positive opinion on the game, and just thought that I would rather play a finished game for free than the alpha version for like 50 cents.
A review, of a review, of a review
Of a review!
of a review
the circle of reviews...
This is like fighting eight snowman’s in a bowl reviewing review
reviewception
This video just confuses me as to why did they ever let the Writer and others react originally. This was a solid response 👌
it was more of a unedited reaction "response". wasnt very good so im glad he made another edited one
If Franco would have responded and not his editor this beef basically wouldn’t exist
Yeah, but bloxburg is VERY different, it’s a life simulator, yours is an obby, obbies don’t have any (or very little) replayability, like, waiting 10 years for a game to release freely, is a bad idea, especially with a 50 robux price tag on it, if you make a game cost money, and “modifiers” makes the game harder, but difficulty doesn’t add any truly new experience to your game, it’s a replay, on higher difficulty.
Pretty good point since w games like bloxburg you can mess around w the assests (or content) they already gave you to have more variety and playtime but w obbies the gamemode act as modifiers but aside from a few changes the actual courses of the gameplay doesnt change much
If you think difficulty doesnt add replayability then have u even played obbies? Games like jtoh is all about difficulty
@@eduardomontenegro8209 scratch that, if you think difficulty doesn't add replayability have you played a Video Game before?
@@petrikhorrI never said it doesn’t add replayability I said it’s not any new, meaningful content, and difficulty can be extremely different in different games/ genres, like Doom, playing on a hard difficulty on doom makes the game feel actually threatening since you’ve played on a easier difficulty the difficulty change actually adds a bit more spice to the gameplay, while in platformers they could just make it so you have no checkpoints and everything kills you with a touch, that’s not fun, that’s just tedious, some platformers do it differently, adding new, significantly more challenging areas or just modifying whatever’s meant to kill you, modifiers add replayability, just not really any incentive to do so, and they aren’t fun to do either, of course the dopamine you get after beating a hitless run is nice, it’s temporary, and doesn’t add anything really new other than “just don’t die”
Obbies have some what replayability fym 😭
I know that the response to the Eclipse video wasn't the best, but these developers love what they are creating. All of the people who are hating on them are the same ones who would react the same way if someone like Eclipse made a video about a project they were working on. These guys aren't a company they're humans. I can see that they love this game, and they want to update it and make it one of the best games in this style. I know how difficult the process of creating a game is. I will purchase the game to give these developers some support to make the game better. And no, 50 Robux is not that much it's literally $0.63. Keep up the hard work :)
100%. doubt somebody would react calmly if anyone even insinuated that their passion project was a scam. it is what it is though, it's time to move on
@@ahmdyt
Y'all would have a hard attack looking at real click bait if eclipse click bait title make you react like this dev. It is literally just a question.
"TW is a scam and the dev is dumb!!!!!" *insert shock reaction face*
There a reason you aren't a dev and it showed.
@@applel2.043 Shut up you freak. it's been a week since the drama ended, move on with your life
this is tower of inception all over again
I hope you're not saying this game is just as good as toI 💀.
Nah, ToI is a fun and creative tower, this is just boron yap about games being scams, ToI is much better
/j
@@JaymcJefty you cannot convince me that thin stud spam and gbj spam is better than towers that actually have good aesthetic and creative obstacles.
@@hanniballecter3790yuh uh, toi is extremely so fun it is way better than toer world. please help this is my 148th time failing a thin stud im going insane
@@hanniballecter3790 thin studs are so easy though
hello?? gamepass part???
and eclipse skipped the death block part.
they said useless gamepasses you only use once like in those cashgrab games
tho you might say the same about theres your just coming up with an excuse and there useful.😊
After mellowing out I think both parties had issues; I think TW'S was the personal attacks in the first response, and eclipses is acting like you "had to" or were "forced to" pay for the game. His points honestly weren't even that bad, but his insistence and ignorance was misguided
Why do I see you everywhere now...
What ?
@@axesaintpatate2822 i literally see him commenting Under every video I watch
Oh you don’t have to pay to play the game?
@@therealsonicrb WAIT REALLY?!?! OMGGG
6:35 bro did the skip
I'm an Eclipse viewer but I think you have made some very good points here! Cheers to you for being respectful and making a constructive analysis of his video! Best of luck to your game
bro is expecting the tree to grow without water and sunlight
@@miracicik9638 no sunlight during an eclipse
except that I've heard through the grapevine that they are funded by Hazem...
Jokes aside, this is actually very wise!
funny when I heard something about being funded by hazem
How so? He said they should fund it with donations, and not with paying for the privilege of playing an underdeveloped game
dawg the amount of franco and eclipse glazers in this comment section is crazy
An eclipse is an astronomical event which occurs when an astronomical object or spacecraft is temporarily obscured, by passing into the shadow of another body or by having another body pass between it and the viewer. This alignment of three celestial objects is known as a syzygy. An eclipse is the result of either an occultation (completely hidden) or a transit (partially hidden). A "deep eclipse" (or "deep occultation") is when a small astronomical object is behind a bigger one.
The term eclipse is most often used to describe either a solar eclipse, when the Moon's shadow crosses the Earth's surface, or a lunar eclipse, when the Moon moves into the Earth's shadow. However, it can also refer to such events beyond the Earth-Moon system: for example, a planet moving into the shadow cast by one of its moons, a moon passing into the shadow cast by its host planet, or a moon passing into the shadow of another moon. A binary star system can also produce eclipses if the plane of the orbit of its constituent stars intersects the observer's position.
For the special cases of solar and lunar eclipses, these only happen during an "eclipse season", the two times of each year when the plane of the Earth's orbit around the Sun crosses with the plane of the Moon's orbit around the Earth and the line defined by the intersecting planes points near the Sun. The type of solar eclipse that happens during each season (whether total, annular, hybrid, or partial) depends on apparent sizes of the Sun and Moon. If the orbit of the Earth around the Sun and the Moon's orbit around the Earth were both in the same plane with each other, then eclipses would happen every month. There would be a lunar eclipse at every full moon, and a solar eclipse at every new moon. It is because of the non-planar differences that eclipses are not a common event. If both orbits were perfectly circular, then each eclipse would be the same type every month.
Lunar eclipses can be viewed from the entire nightside half of the Earth. But solar eclipses, particularly total eclipses occurring at any one particular point on the Earth's surface, are very rare events that can be many decades apart.
thank you
Wise.
He expected a finished product because you’re making him pay for it. There’s a reason why most closed and open betas are free because if it’s not a finished product, don’t charge it as if it is one
The game literally says 'Alpha' in the title. It couldn't be more clearly 'Early access' if it wanted to.
Besides, this is far from the only ROBLOX game to do this.
@@band_of_five So tower world is better than literal garbage in that way, that still doesn't make it good
@@AvalynTheAccursed "this is far from the only ROBLOX game to do this" it's still a waste of money, and just because other games are scummy and normalized it, doesn't mean it's not a scummy technique
@@AvalynTheAccursed and how many of the roblox games that were a ''beta'' or an ''alpha'' went from that to a full release, most of them stay in ''beta'' so they can get a free shield against critics
@@devnandannair2336 People acting like this game sucks when the actual quality is higher than most other obbies currently out is very telling.
In fact, most people were against Eclipse when his original video first came out, and the negative comments didn't start flooding in until the Dev's response.
This tells me that the issue people take isn't with the game itself as people are saying *now*, it's with the dev's childish response. So, just say that. Because you're not wrong, the initial response was awful.
But saying that this game is low quality is just plain false. It isn't low quality, it's low in content. Because it's unfinished.
People have this thing where they'll dog on things for reasons that even they themselves don't agree with, just because they don't like the people behind it. Which is an anomaly that I don't understand in the slightest. Not to say nobody is making genuine criticisms here, of course, but given what I've mentioned so far, that almost seems to be the case.
Because ain't no way people are this bent out of shape over 50 bloody robux.
These devs REALLY gotta milk this situacion for the money which is crazy
its an apology i don’t think its mostly for the money
yummers, milk
they apologised for a lot of the stuff here so it's extremely likely it is for defending themselves. a lot of eclipse viewers tried to raid Tower World too so it further proves this high probability.
Milky money
@@AkaObbiesthanks youtube children, very cool
"I would make the same points myself" Then why didn't you? You were basically just hiding behind your buddy. Listen man its not a personal attack, i really think that out of everyone in your discord call that you had in your last video on Eclipse. No offense man but also how could Eclipse knew that you develop the story more? Its not like he has behind the scenes footage that you do on adding those new npcs and stuff, and he got his point of the writer not being that valuable because the game he played wasn't story driven, you can't just assume that he will know what you will add and what you have planned. But i'm glad that you did this video alone and witheout any immature behaviours so i respect you for that.
fire comment btw
👏 spit your words indeed my guy
To be fair, to say that the devs haven't updated sine May, and then say that they 'aren't working on the game' where there are public teasers in their public discord server does suggest that Eclipse didn't really care to see whether they have actually been working on the game
@@seadrown6252 Did Eclipse join their discord? No. He made a review based on what he played. You don't have to have external sources to make a review right? You can't attack him for not looking at another app that is not necessary to play the game since that argument you brought sounds a bit stupid.
Great comment
cant believe there's an argument over a roblox game that costs less than a roblox hat
all this for a 4k RTX version of tower of hell, its really never that deep
@@antiwolfer8691 wait until you find out Tower World is a fangame of the game that inspired Tower of Hell
eh, the game is deeper than a 4k rtx version of ToH, but I get where you're coming from
the game has several unique gimmicks compared to ToH, like swap pads, turrets, moving platforms, spinning platforms, 2d sections, wall jumps, double jumps, damage bricks, heal pads, buttons, timed buttons, boss fights, box puzzles, quicksand and more things that I probably forgot to mention. the game has no shortage of mechanics to throw at you while not being overwhelming, and they still have more unique things to throw at us, especially with toxic tower and the potential of poison mechanics! when you look at the design, it does look like ToH, but they spent more than 10 minutes making each stage, and it is also ascending. Fun fact: Juke's Towers of Hell was the inspiration for Tower World and was made before Tower of Hell. Juke's Towers of Hell used to be called Kiddie's Towers of Hell, under a different name and owner who made Tower of Hell, meaning that JToH inspired ToH and TW, plus hundreds of difficulty chart obbies and other tower obbies!
thanks for reading :D
tower of hell is a mid game this is more like a JTOH sub realm
@@AkaObbies doesnt make it more worth it theres plenty of other games i find better
@@AkaObbiesthese features feel more like extras than regular features
*Eclipse made the video*
Everyone: damn that makes sense
*TW devs respond*
Everyone: damn that makes sense
*Eclipse respond*
Everyone: damn that makes sense
*TW devs respond*
Everyone: damn that makes sense
So real
*Eclipse made the video*
Everyone: damn that makes sense
did it?
srsly look at the comments on the original video or even just watch it if you havent
@@pog9650 so quirky and unique you're the only one who thought if it really made sense or not ⛓💔⛓
damn that makes sense
I eat slop content everyday so i guess this aint too new lol
The eclipse situation is INSANE
Huge Tower World Drama
WE reacted to eclipse's response
Tower World/Eclipse just destroyed his career...
Eclipse lied...
FrancoJ is done...
Tower World Drama is reaching its end...
Eclipse is COOKED...
dude has no idea how the video game development operates lol
Mathfactro?
Seriously. Paying only 50c for a really good obby game with a good quality in an alpha & not p2w or any freemium stuffs is a good deal. Like this is not even comparable to triple A games with bugs at 60$ made by big studios rather than independent devs.
Yes he doesnt why is that a problem? All he is saying that the game is not worth 20 developers why shoud an outsider game reviewer tell you how your game team operates? Just think about it imagine you make a comment on space shuttles and i say "dude has no idea how space shuttles work lol"
@@pigit7526 yeah that’s why I don’t post space shuttle reviews
Do you mean eclipse has no idea how development works or franco doesnt?
coming from a 8 year game developer in scripting, VFX and building I'd like to say these points. This is after watching both your videos and eclipses, and understanding both sides. (I personally don't like how you guys handled this OR how eclipse handled this but he did it in self defense.)
1. if you needed to pay for dev's, DONT make the players pay for it. As a game dev i'm okay with putting a game as paid if you are actively working on the game, showing sneak peaks and actively showing the community your working on it. IM ONLY okay with paid games if their in "early access", otherwise having to pay for dev's or to hire people is NOT a excuse. You could get some investors to help fund the game and pay your dev's that way. I also don't know how you guys use your funds but it seems you guys have used them in a okay way.
2. Working on getting the game out of alpha is a good push towards the future of the game and is a good way to be heading, I will say my self you have a lot of dev's and if I were you I'd try to trim that down a bit if possible and I would ALSO try leaning new skills to try to get better, working on games is a good way to get better and learn more. Overall you guys are going in a good direction with the game in terms of trying to get out of alpha as soon as possible.
3. PAID ACCESS GAMES SHOULD BE HELD HIGHER THEN FREE GAMES UNLESS THEIR EARLY ACCESS. if a games in early access I can understand this, once the game is out of early access it should be held to a higher standard no matter the price. If you have to pay for the game, once it becomes free it should be higher in quality than the standard and those who bought early access should get a benefit in game if you really see this as support.
if you want your game to be higher than standard, your on the right path towards getting out of alpha, if you want this game to be standard then keep doing what your doing. There's nothing wrong with being standard and it can give you growth and more knowledge towards your next game. Your on the right path, but personally, I'd go about it differently. I don't mean this to attack anyone just to create a middle ground of, this game is standard and has high potential. Eclipse did keep in mind he had to pay for it so he gave it extra criticism but I do think he attacked you guys calling the game "a scam". Both sides are wrong and right in different ways.
this game had funding from haz3m so i dont think their spending is good tbh
@@limyongjunmeridianss6038 The fund is for his dad??
@@user-gh9sv3jt3z wait it was? apologies then
🍿
highschool fights be kinda different from the movies ngl
🍿
Get back to the decaying winter lore video buddy
what is this emoji the screen is so zoomed out for me i cant tell if its a microphone or an ice cream
@@PrettyForgettable🍿
To all the people commenting about how its not that deep, or that this video is for more interaction, just imagine trying to build up a game with genuine effort, and it gets shut down by a youtuber like this. One of the main opinions of a project you've worked so hard on with so many other people is now just the butt of another joke, and there's nothing you can even do about it besides put out a defence where the people who need to hear it are long gone on their side of the argument.
Nobody gains anything from this situation anymore,
This is just depressing.
The one shutting it down is the dev team themselves acting unprofessional and this video only serves to save their asses
You can’t blame them for doing a one take watch party video where they make of him because it seemed like it was just a click bait video that existed solely for money and that he didn’t care about the game itself. Of course they’re gonna say rude dumb shit, you’d do that too in the moment, hell even I would. That’s human to get angry over that kind of thing
It is your own action, your fault. Think before you do things buddy. No one would have make a big deal if you didn't just use personal attack on the RUclipsr when he is just giving his opinion.
@@applel2.043how would YOU feel if someone called your game a “scam” and then told everyone watching the video NOT to buy it? Angry, no? Fuck, I would be ENRAGED. (No don’t you dare say ultrakill reference)
@@GuardiaGuy
Tell me where eclipse say that and I will told you my answer. Specific time mark is necessary btw.
Not trying to choose sides but “paying devs” is not an excuse, it’s a valid reason.
Alright just think about it though how is normally a game created? People get money and pay devs to make a game but apparently here they expect that the players pay their development funds its honestly disgusting
@@pigit7526 How..? They’re a studio that has no real financial backing (unlike bigger games who have entire companies behind them that can afford to risk however much on the funds for a game).
Also, a bunch of indie games made by small developers have set up go fund me’s while the game is being developed so that they can actually afford to hire more devs so they can make the game how they want to.
Why is this different?
@@pigit7526. (I already sent this once but it isn’t showing up so I’m doing it again)
How..? They’re a studio that has no real financial backing (unlike bigger games who have entire companies behind them that can afford to risk however much on the funds for a game).
Also, a bunch of indie games made by small developers have set up go fund me’s while the game is being developed so that they can actually afford to hire more devs so they can make the game how they want to.
Why is this different?
it isn’t a valid reason, forcing other people to fund YOUR game to play it while it’s UNFINISHED is YOUR problem, not theirs.
@@johnnypickles. forcing? Who forced you to? Everyone who buys this game has the choice not to. And it’s not like they’re promoting it as a finished game.
Also, that’s literally how a bunch of indie games got created, like many games have started go fund me’s or other things like that that do nothing but give developers money so they can develop.
Like you can’t just spawn money out of nowhere, you can’t just hire people for free, and not everyone, actually, probably most people, don’t have the means to do that AND work a full time job so they can eat.
This is why we can’t have nice things, people like you completely ignoring the reasons behind pay walls to games that aren’t even finished existing.
Just don’t pay the price. You literally have free will. No one is making you buy it.
(Sorry for being hostile, but I’m seriously upset that people think this shit is free or something, and I haven’t seen a valid reason other than “But Roblox game cost money bad!”)
From what I’m hearing and seeing.
1.) why is your refute for Eclipse’s points, what you said the first time? Isn’t that what you initially said?
2.)I completely understand the writer defense, but essentially what eclipse wants to see can be boiled down to a better Obby experience in the classic sense. So expanding the actual amount of levels to play should be your main focus, and not a story (Eclipse POV).
His main problem is that there is a lack of story in the first place despite there being a writer, so yeah both sides make sense.
3.) yeah so that would also be my main problem with eclipse’s side on this. It seems you have a more grand plan for the game.
But for eclipse’s view, it’s simply another obby game as of now. And because of a lack of story elements, he can only really assume you’re going for more obby.
4.) I feel like for all the good pounts both sides have made so far (I’m at 6:07), I feel like there’s a little bit of a disconnect.
Eclipse views the fact that one had to pay to enter the game means it’s a game.
Your view on this is that it’s funding for your game.
Eclipse not seeing how making the game alpha and paid early access *IS* the donation is a little weird. The other option was simply not letting people play the game at all. With no alpha I guess.
However a large problem for eclipse is the fact that you guys also haven’t updated the game “since May”, so it doesn’t seem like the game is getting updated or worked on at all.
5.)When eclipse says “forced”, he’s talking about the fact that you *can’t play the game otherwise.*
7:39 “if you are a player, and you choose not to pay for the alpha” doesn’t exactly make sense for the same reason. Because you aren’t a player, if you can’t play… the game.
6.)it’s good to see that the developers (presumably you) are working on this big update, and im excited to see the game at full release.
However, as my last point for now, Eclipse is a little jaded from YBA it seems. He has seen big grandiose promises, and long wait times between each update only to see YBA kinda just crumble apart with trash updates, and failed promises. Especially their new battlegrounds game which had flopped recently. (Same devs) Hense the fact that he sees it as a likely scam.
Also eclipse seems to be a little pissed from all the personal assaults so that clearly explains his tone.
Edit: alright alright, I lied.
7.) 13:31 he did explain. Sure it wasn’t in your video right now but it was explained why he thought it was cringe. Because of the left in “meta dialogue”, I’ll have to pull up eclipse’s video to see what it was specifically, but it was something like: “is the recording over” or “is that the end of the line”.
I’ll just be watching the video from here normally
Your reply beought in good points, hopefully the devs see it, swallow their pride, and take in the constructive criticism to make the game better.
Aside from the theatrics, the sentiment is understandable.
If a player invests money into a game that's in an unfinished state, it's to be expected that they'll hold the product to high standards. If it fails to meet their measurement of satisfaction, then frustration is a valid feeling because they spent money on a game that's substandard. Sure, it would be considered their own fault for investing that money, but the dev's who knowingly published the product to the public in an incomplete state would also be in the wrong.
A question that needs to asked amongst your team is: "what does our obby game provide, that others don't?" The bosses and novel mechanics of the game are a step in the right direction, but what else can be added? I'm not suggesting that Tower World should be a DeepWoken clone, but more less offer content that's plentiful and varied that makes it worthwhile.
I know it's easy to dismiss the players who criticize the game because they're ignorant to the procedure of game development, but belittling them isn't how you resolve problems. It's just one big misunderstanding, really.
I think this drama should be resolved over a discord chat, not over youtube videos at this point
Ngl this guy sometimes starts sentences like an AI
I genuinely find it hard to believe that people can't comprehend the concept of EARLY access. You are not paying for the full game, you are paying for the current product + future installments to said product.
yea but the future installments are…free? so there’s literally no point in paying if you’re getting a WORSE product and your time wasted while the developers say “no ur stupid” to valid criticism, and then people play the better game for free while you sit in the corner with your money time and dignity wasted.
@@johnnypickles. if ur dignity is worth 50 robux then idk man
@@ArisIsCringe who said that? i was talking about the developers giving you shit for valid criticism, read more carefully next time, yes? also never said i bought the game, not my type.
@@evangreenbreadstick You enjoyed the game but there’s still issues with it that they ignore, the fact that it’s paid and shouldn’t doesn’t budge by you enjoying the game EVEN THOUGH there’s unpaid options that are 10x better, and don’t open a comment with a literal insult it just makes you look immature.
@@evangreenbreadstick no that’s crazy cause i was thinkin the same thing but if you were ok with it whyd you write me an essay❓❓
He is casually hating on scrapper
scrapper is my character whenever i am sad i just play tower world
scrapper is cringe ngl
I can't disable him from the story oh my goodness
@@Xirkeni'm sure you will have an option to choose different characters in the future
this is a good response honestly. hopefully eclipse forgives and understands
He won’t he said he will stay with what he said in the last vid and won’t watch this one
@@Name.string oh shoot, will this REALLY is avengers infinity war
@@Name.stringof course he's being stubborn as always
@@plasticantheres a difference between being stubborn and not wanting to continue petty drama
@@Name.string"won't watch" where??
i was ranting in the comments all night about that video's video's video and it genuinely makes me happy to see this developer finally take it apart. awesome video btw
gang what is there to rant about, the people on tower worlds side are clearly in the wrong 😭😭
if you check eclipse’s video you can see its longer than this, because he skipped most important clips like the gamepass stuff which you should definitely watch
@@mridotprobably true these people are js mindlessly glazing this game
@@johnnypickles. buddy I've seen you in like 6 comments talking about "The devs suck Eclipse is in the right." Shut up about glazing.
@@maybefoxtart me when i complain about people glazing but the person glazing is actually the glazer and is insulting people about glazing, while glazing.
Blud bought your half cooked game, tried to make good video with some criticism and valid point ,after that devs just roasted him almost for no reason(great tactic guys ,hope your great and very detailed plot WILL BE in the game!)
@@gamezonez9233 you're like two videos behind, they apologized for that
You have not watched the video at all good job listening both sides
To be fair what i feel like actually happened wasnt that he "misunderstood" what they said but this guy was just saving their asses and his games reputation
@@pigit7526feels like a mix of both tbh
This is a good response video, apologizing on the personal attacks and give an reasonable explaination for it, and also addressing some of Eclipse's points.
But its still crazy that this drama accour over some cents, its like the bloxburg going free thing all over again
It’s only 50 robux cmon no need for this drama, the misinformation on both sides is crazy and the bias is reaching new heights.
If you don’t want drama don’t get involved.
Grab a popcorn and sit back. The world needs chaos and conflict from time to time
@@justpurpledMan this world Fucking Sucks
@@GuardiaGuy it is what it is
Honestly, I think Eclipse should’ve responded better so the devs can actually work on the game and make it free. Now Eclipse has no valid criticism for the paid alpha, as it’s not paid anymore.
Eclipse: Responding to FrancoJ’s response of me responding to my response of FrancoJ’s video, released 5 minutes ago.
How come you never mentioned the lie on the gamepasses?
I'm with eclipse but I got to agree with you on the fact you can't make a good game with just a builder and scripter, you need so many more skills to make sure its not just an average game
Yes but mind you this is an obby game while sure it is above average but among above average obbies its average AND paid acces while i do agree devs are needed on a project like this but OVER 9? FOR AN OBBY?
Its a freking obby. Exept the boss battle all the assets are easy to find on yt or the toolbox. 9 devs ARE TO MUCH. Visuals? U can learn pretty easy. Story? Why? Voice? Just do it yourself. Not hating on the game but still.
@@GiacomoAruta Not every developer on Roblox likes to use the toolbox instead of making their own assets imo
@@GiacomoAruta”you can learn pretty easy”
Are you a dev? If you aren’t, then that statement is horrible.
@@GuardiaGuy im a dev. The only difficult thing is the UI. All the other thing are pretty basic. Why do u need a dev that only does effects, they are extreamly easy (talking about the one In the current game). Also the animation (from what there is currently) all of them are extreamly easy.
when i searched "tower world response" the 2 videos came, the rest is 9/11 videos.
"I apologize for how we acted" *goes on to act extremely passive aggressive and imply continued agreement with statements in the previous video"
by the way, really funny thing, the only point that actually makes sense is just a nothing-burger. he says "we post consistent updates in our discord" and literally the only meaningful update posted was the same one eclipse mentioned. Also I love how he acts like making moving and disappearing platforms and a couple animations in an uncreative block game are really challenging skills
because certain points in the original response were actually good but not well-formulated
also he's literally just using the same tone eclipse was using
@@tezla1530 The reason eclipse was using that tone is because the dev team was acting really petty and aggressive. Responding in the same way it started isn't going to fix anything.
@@toyuu.paledllEclipse was FAR more aggresive in his reaponse video than in the first video lol
@@toyuu.paledll he literally explained in this new response that they themselves were like that because of how easily misleading the title combined with the intro of eclipse's video was, they felt as if he was causing his fans to believe that their game is a scam
now he has this tone to mirror eclipse as he himself also made some flawed remarks
@@RadicalRadio The dev team were repeatedly taking personal jabs, insulting him in ways that are unnecessary and painting him as an idiot. All of the points they made were either factually untrue or easily refutable and petty defenses.
Bad ending: You did NOT kill 8 snowmans [LOUD INCORRECT BUZZER]
Edit: They forgot to kill yeti or snow bandits too smh 😔
wow.. i just realised how biased i was. i respect that fact you stood up for yourselves and still took accountability while being fair
Took accountability? He literally he dug his grave then he "apologized" by shi**ing on him for not knowing how to make games (since why should he know) and then proceeded to say that he misunderstood everything LIKE ARE WE BEING SERIOUS?
@@pigit7526 i dont get what you mean... they say multiple times its their bad and they wasn't prepared. But they also literally show in alot of the video how unfair eclipse was being. Eclipse seems to of misunderstood alot and if im wrong tell me how
id love to test the game and formulate my own review, but i dont want to spend robux, so ig ill never know lol
you will know in full release, but it wont be in testing/alpha
At this point you should've just named the current game a V-Slice and then expanded that until you could eventually release the game instead of an Alpha, most issues would've been solved like that.
But yeah, better video, both sides have some points, but I do agree with Eclipse mostly, paid early access immediately raises the expected level of quality regardless of everything else.
"Oh, but we need to pay our devs!" Yeah, sure, I agree devs should be paid, I also agree that y'know, that isn't an excuse, you asking for payment for a promise, which we've seen countless times not working out, not trusting this way of operation is normal. Devs should be paid but it shouldn't fall on the players to do most of that, at this point selling ideas already burned so many hands most people will be angry at it, rightfully so, so if devs should be paid, it would fall on you to get most of the payment beforehand, you already showed you can do minor projects with your other game, continue on that until you feel you have enough to make your main game.
@@SpecsWitched that’s like saying a game can’t have kickstarters because it’s just an excuse for…. Not being able to pay their devs????
“Devs should be paid but it shouldn’t fall on the players to do that…” okay bro then WHOS PAYING THE DEVS
@@otherlego Then make a Kickstarter, simple, in fact, that'll reinforce my point about making the game a v-slice demo, so you can show your work and then start the Kickstarter.
The paid alpha system isn't good for anyone, just because it worked out for Jujutsu Infinite every other dev hopped on it and now the platform is riddled with these games that just look like cash grabs, it's Eclipse's point "We're not as bad as those guys, pay us!"
Also I literally said before how they could gather the funds to make a v-slice demo, they are skilled, they have the means and the dedication to do so, but they decided to not do it like that and here we are.
@@SpecsWitched ??? who makes a kickstarter for a roblox game. you havent said how they would get the money without the players
@@otherlego I said Kickstarter because it's easier to grasp the concept that way, you can gather robux through many ways, donations are literally the best option, say they went with what I said and made a Demo, 1-2 towers, you like the demo? Donate for the full game, include a goal amount, it'll incentivize people to donate if they liked the V-Slice Demo.
As for funding, to quote me: "[...] you already showed you can do minor projects with your other game, continue on that until you feel you have enough (money) to make your main game."
The response is actually quite valid and although some of the arguments were well-made, these are my main complaints:
That the game costs 50 robux for an alpha, and you're saying "you're contributing to our project" still does not explain why do you have to pay for an unfinished project. If you want money for the game while still charging for it, you can add a demo of the alpha, where you can play the tutorial and a tower or two until you can charge people to play the rest of the game or if you don't want to, like Eclipse already said: Just add donations or in my personal opinion, do like a lot of alpha paid access games do: reward the player when the game fully releases with exclusive rewards, or like I already said, just do a demo of the alpha.
4:00 Then why did you just stay silent in the original response and not even attempt to assist the writer?
15:26 I played the game a few months before the review and I myself had no clue that was even a thing since there was nothing enforcing the existence of that feature. 16:26 While I think that's a good addition, I still feel like it needs a more noticeable mention besides it being at a little sign at the start of the tutorial.
I also found in my own play through the game to be EXTREMELY unoptimized, and it really shows with my garbage setup not being able to render some things properly, it was running at around 2 FPS and I kept pushing until I reached the cactus boss and everything just broke, I couldn't even damage it, or I just didn't understand what to do properly thus giving a problem that can be solved by making it if the player has wasted multiple chances of damaging the boss, give a reminder of how to do it. What I suggest doing is splitting each tower into a sub-game inside the main lobby, thus helping with those issues.
These are my ideas that I think would make the game better and give some feedback.
Because a developer is entitled of making their game either free or paid, it's that simple.
how are you not able to grasp the concept of early access
5:52 bro really didnt watch his video
he did but did you? stop glazing Eclipse and realise that Eclipse can make mistakes too they took the valid criticism he gave
@@ToreCentipedelegitimately coping right now omg
@@ToreCentipede bro is on copium. I stopped watching there. You know why? Because they are obviously trying to save face instead of just fixing their game which would make them look better anyways. By arguing with him they just prove themselves to be greedy. They could listen to his criticisms of their game and make it better. But no!!! They ignore his criticisms like how the death bricks are ass and say "you are saying our game is bad just cuz its paid accesss!!" Even though it wasnt even the point and he actually had valid reasons.
@mordoc1186 you have no right to speak if you haven't watched the video, you are doing exactly what you are saying the developer is doing. Franco DID talk about the criticism and DID say he will make changes regarding that criticism. Also if you watched the video you would know that eclipse left out the part where the devs said that the levels aren't centered around the hurt bricks and that they are really only there to show which way you're not supposed to go and for the modifiers. Speak again when you watch the video
@@TrueHey so you are saying that the owner is contradicting himself... dont think that helps your case but ok
i love scrapper. we ALL love scrapper
can somebody summarize the drama i dont feel like watching the videos of both parties to learn
back and forth between devs and youtuber misunderstanding each others points for an hour or so
Its like only 1 hour long ? What happened with your attention span?
@@gamezonez923328 minutes
@gamezonez9233 You're sayin this in the comment section where 90% of people are Eclipse fans outing themselves as not being able to read for any longer than 20 seconds at a time.
Are you really surprised the same people that refer to anything long enough to be constructive as "yapping" don't care enough to hear about what actually happened before siding with their favourite?
First video: eclipse saying that some mechanics were poorly thought out, but also that the game feels unfinished (I wonder why) and that it's not worth 50 robux
The dev's reaction: are upset that eclipse is calling their game a scam because the game is in early access, meaning that people who buy the game are buying it to support its development and what they are getting is an unfinished experience, and once the game is finished it will become free. They also agree with eclipse's complaints about mechanics being weird and said they will fix it but they still continued to drag eclipse around about it. Pretty much a response blinded by hate
Eclipse's response: still petty about the price tag and refuses to learn what "early access" means, addresses that they were way too mean with their response, also points out how many developers they have (which is fair they have a lot) and then talks about how they only need like 2 devs and they can learn the skills themselves (what was bro cooking with that)
This video: much more calm but still pretty passive aggressive, apologizes for the blind hate in the last video but still elaborates that the game is in early access, and that nobody is forcing you to buy the game and you can just wait until it becomes free. Also refutes his ill informed claim about only having 2 devs, says that they need a writer for their story which is not in the current build of the game, and says that they need that many devs for when some of their other devs are unable to work (still not really that good of an excuse tbh and only lackluster part of this video)
you sound like the type of person to put flaming hot cheetos in the fridge to cool them down
Thats completely unrelated???
yeah well you look like you wear a hat to hide your bald spot!
you still play tds in 2024 wake up buddy the game has been ass since 2020
More like after the ducky event tbh@@livemajimareaction9418
I'm going to be honest I think the developers and contributors of Tower World don't really understand what Eclipse's channel is. He's said multiple times that these reviews are SOLELY his opinions. His reviews are more of "this is my opinion of the game" rather then an unbiased game review. His viewers (including me) enjoy him sharing his opinion on the game, but that doesn't mean the game is objectively bad. To him the game just falls under his standards of the reviews he does (which he said in the response video). He has his own criteria and I honestly think you guys are taking this harder than it was actually meant to be. Also his title is worded like that because he also said people were asking him if Tower World was worth money and if it was a scam, so he capitalized off this for a clickbait title because to take something from your book, he also needs to be payed and at the end of the day he's getting payed to share his opinion not an actual full review. In conclusion I think you've lowkey taken this video from Eclipse too far and should keep working on the game is you believe it has a good future.
"Solely his oppinion" then why is he litterally just speaking trash about the game and saying raindom things for 34 minutes on the game?
@@Lean99999you either haven't watched the video or you weren't listening
Yeah what eclipse doesnt understand is that he has 300k subs hes not making videos for his 4 friends of his impressions on a game. People that wach eclipse take everything he says as the truth and think he can do no wrong and then never give any of the games he "reviews" a chance eclipses opinion is his fans opinion
19:23 "and the other fart feels astronomically harder" 💀💀💀
The fact that yall just skipped the game pass part
and eclipse skipped the death block explanation of not dying part. Its equal now.
Wait when did he skipped the part?@@lamppost101
@@Hulkshitting 20:16 or 20:37 to skip right to it
@@lamppost101 what which video? I see the eclipse respond its different
@@Hulkshitting because he skipped it?
this video was just running away from all the valid criticisms like dodging touhou bosses
Have a boxing match with Eclipse 😈
@@PrettyForgettable he's killed quite a few snowmen
@@PrettyForgettableleave my goat alone 😭
La Velada del Año if it was actually great
@@PrettyForgettable maybe... But he survived a whole week before leaving...
Dawg FrancoJ would Actually blow up eclipse
This is why debates in the form of video essays suck kids.
icl this was like atleast top 3 calmest response videos ive ever watched
great job
In an original product you should assume the consumers don’t know anything at all or else you’d just be limiting your audience to people are informed or people so intrigued they do research.They teach this in middle school dawg
@@therealsonicrb Did you respond to the wrong comment or something
@@Gamer-qr8ee yup might have to get an android since I did not mean to comment this here
Ok so i wanna point out something, because i feel like this could potentially hurt the game and you guys don't see it (or i'm just dumb).
But you said that people might want to support you by BUYING the game, but they're not obligated to do so. I find this is worse than having it for free with donations.
Because, for me, you are indeed making a person pay for the game, without knowing if they want to support it or not. They will play the game, and they might just not like it, but they still supported you by paying for the game but they could regret that decision. If supporting the game is optional, donations would be more efficient.
If you leave the game for free, people will experience the game first, then decide whether they want to support this game by donating, or just giving feedback on it, and in case they don't like it all that much, they could still be interested in it's future because it's an ALPHA.
For me, this game being for free would give an increase in both the community of it, the feedback, critcism and support of the game, because they get to play the game first on its current state, judge if they like it or not, and if they would like to see more of it in the future, and possibly donate and give feedback to it.
For example let me take ULTRAKILL, while the situations here are kinda different, i can still get my point across:
-ULTRAKILL has a demo available to the public with i think only the prelude, this gives the player a trial of the game before they decide if they like it and want to buy the full product. This could also maybe apply to Tower World, i feel like im repeating myself too much but it would be the same as i said above, a free trial of the game could get potential newcomers interested in supporting it and giving feedback.
But anyways, i'm gonna repeat myself too much if i don't stop, this is my personal opinion in why paid access games on roblox are kinda problematic and making it free could make good for the game.
As for this whole "drama", i just want it to stop, this video is way more professionally done than the last one, but both Eclipse's video and your past video had a lot of issues in how it was handled. I wish for both the Devs and Eclipse to end on good terms and not prolong this anymore, as it looks more like a back and forth of throwing shit to eachother instead of full on criticism (not saying the videos don't do actual criticism on eachother, but just that it feels more of a responding to prove the other wrong in a hateful manner rather than solving the problems between both parties)
A developer is entitled of making their game either free or paid, it's that simple. Doing any research about the game before purchasing it is an unspoken rule for ANY PAID game out there, they're not forcing you to pay for their game, and you have a responsibility as a consumer to know what you're getting your hands on before purchasing.
@@Shereen3 I understand everything you said, i'm just saying that because in this case it's roblox, many people on roblox don't care to pay for a game, they just take the free/easiest option without researching about the game, most they will look at is the description at most. It's a complete different world to, Steam games for example, in my eyes.
I just believe that having a pay to access alpha game doesn't feel like it's the best option for a roblox game, specially if they need support and feedback.
Of course if they want to make it free or not it's up to them, i have no say in that, but just sharing my thoughts.
@@justafurry9400 I agree that it's typically not the best decision to make a paid access game in roblox, but it is what it is.
crazy how he is only hearting comments that are 100% on his side. he didnt change one bit, he just wrote a script and read it, this is not who this person really is, the last video is who this guy truly is.
what’s wrong with a scripted response he made on his own? elaborate
@@yangliu6901 because its not HIM saying sorry, its the SCRIPT saying sorry, he most likely doesnt care at all, and only made this response video to get all the haters of his cheeks
are you okay? theres nothing wrong with having a scripted response
If it’s not ai generated or some shit, he still wrote and meant it. You’re point is non existent l
@@Duck-ld5xi because its not HIM saying sorry, its the SCRIPT saying sorry, he most likely doesnt care at all, and only made this response video to get all the haters of his cheeks
Im not even going to pick a side, i think conflict is the best way for both sides to learn.
NAH TOWER WORLD ALWAYS WINS RAAAAAHHHH
@@lamppost101 just because of this comment I'm completely siding with eclipse.
@@JustKisa. bro it aint that serious 😭 besides you were already siding with eclipse anyways
@@lamppost101 completely siding
@@JustKisa. womp womp
How do you even pay 20 developers with 50 active players? They are payed with peanuts?
Nah bro, They're getting paid one cent/one robux. But for real, I think the owner has a part time job or something to pay for those developers.
@@Arclife-kj8nw yall have no idea how developers make robux on roblox, so don't speak on the topic when you don't know how they make their robux.
oh no they had WAYYYYYY freaking more they just have not updated in a while so its gotten down, when the update comes out there will be a lot of people.
@@BenGzzzzzz how do developers make enough money to pay 20 developers with 50 active players? Can you explain?
@@guido1969 sure! let me break it down real quick: since the players who have Premium on roblox, have long hours playtime on tower world the roblox account or group under the game gets something called Premium payouts. i had gotten them before and the more time u keep the Premium player in the game the more robux. so try do the math 50 active players / avg around 4 hours maybe? (im not sure about their play time but from the other video the "writer" i believe said something about the play time. edit: the writer said something about different players having arounf 30-40 hours playtime. so trust me when i say the Premium payouts for that are good.
writer say put 8 snowmans in the game
Reaction, to a reaction, to a reaction.
I think Franco and eclipse need to talk it out to really understand each others points.
Ill be honest i dont think both sides understand eachother i feel like you just need to sit on a call or something because eclipse doesnt understand why anyone would buy your game when there is arguably many better obbies for free
And you dont understand why he feels that way because eclipse reviews roblox game as actual game experiences so he reviews steam games and roblox games the same way and accoriding to a non roblox player you would not buy an alpha to wait for the games full release while i do agree with many of your points i belive that with the way eclipse reviews games it makes perfect sense
Some valid points, id like to hear eclipse response since there's some things that we're not known to the public. So maybe now he could review it again but with more insight.
The thing is the insight doesnt matter since all that matters is the game not how their devs operate
Not only that but there are some issue like the fact that he keeps bringing back old points that r not good. Exemple: 50 bobux we paid devs: if u put the game free it will get more players and the premium payouts give u way more. And u can still put dono options.
Then the title one: its yt, its made so it gets more clicks
There are more issue but im lazy to write those down
@@pigit7526 That is true its more about how the player experience and not the behind the scenes.
unrelated but is that limbus company dungeon music
IT IS
mentioned.
LIMBUS COMPANYYY
BEACH VOLLEYBERRRRR
This is completely related
So, who is the best manipulator in this debate ?
Eclipse JH. Brando (escape from the bowl of 8 snowmans) VS Franco AM. Judge (owner of Tower of fanta- uh Tower world)
If you have all the references in that comment, you are fricking amazing ! :)
why are both partys acting like 50 robux is 30$ shits 50 cents 😭
You still have to buy 400 robux anyway to buy it, its a waste.
@@lukasmarek3424 get roblox on your phone and buy the 1 dollar option
@@lukasmarek3424 no you dont you can buy 80 robux for like a dollar now on mobile and plus 400 robux is like 8 dollars
@@lukasmarek3424yea and without counting with countries using less valuable money like where i live 400 robux is
R$28
The point isnt the price its the need to pay for a subpar product and the complete product being free is nonsense
this was a really really good response good job.
I’m gonna have to side with eclipse unless you had weird strict tower
breadian's alts are escaping the basement, we're cooked
One of the tower’s in tower world has a residence. Before it was a massacre.
@@sirskibbles weird strict dad vs kill 8 snowmens (with the occasional bowl comment)
i'll buy the game if i see a Leon S. Kennedy tower in this game
Bro flat out denied that fact that there could be a free to play obby out there with more content then tower worlds.
take a shot every time he says “alpha”
i’d be blackout drunk rn
take a shot every time the tower world devs are clearly wrong 😭😭
i feel like the people who are just hating in the comments should just watch the video, cus most of this actually seemed pretty reasonable
Yes it did seem reasonable however many parts also werent he got heated at eclipse for not understanding how their their dev team operates and the importance of their writer (which eclipse couldnt have known) and saying he "misunderstood" their points which makes sense since their points were horribly structured and definitely afected by their hate another thing is as always he only responded to what was convenient for example they said that there were no game passes even though they clearly are there which is a pretty big point for their whole paid alpha thing to play game early
@@pigit7526 i feel like this was more just clearing stuff up than anything and eclipse just shouldn't have spoken about their dev team without knowing anything about it, they def should have spoken about the gamepasses thing in this video though
Dude
Its 50 cents what the heck
How is there drama about paying 50 cents for a game
Turkish econamy sucks Man 😭
Because they got way too heated for no reason and eclipse wants money its not hardx
how's the payroll from hazem going
why is he calling it a review when eclipse only does first impressions
the funding was for francoj’s dad’s medical bills
@@kpjv thanks for confirming i was actually asking really
oh hey
I watched your bt (block tales) videos
Was it this hard to make the first video like this one?
This was a very good response but it's odd how quick some comments are saying Eclipse didnt give any valid criticism or points.
Both sides were at fault in different ways here, both were wrong about various things, both may have had a lack of research in some aspects.
Hopefully it ends here, very pointless drama.
Hmm, no.
Both parties missed points and you, tower world, missed more points. You still are trying to say that he's not giving you criticism when he's clearly giving a lot. Watch the video and you'll see the criticisms.
Moreof, the points made in this video feel more ignorant and I understand that you didn't try too but you are missing A LOT of points in the second video.
I'm not saying Eclipse didn't miss points either. It's because the misunderstanding between the 2 sides is extremely huge. Both sides think their right so both will defend their points to their fullest.
Conclusion: stop trying to defend your morals in this situation. focus more on improving the game and take what each others side said to improve on the game or life in general. Call it a draw 😊
But he has to defend as eclipse has the higher subs, meaning higher effect on what he says, so if he says “game bad”, all the kids are gonna agree with him
the only main things that eclipse points out from my knowledge is that its a paid alpha, you can jumps off grindrails, you can walk off walkable walls, and he didnt know about the r key. idk if this is a total draw but both parties made some bad descisions. I hope this is either forgotton about are solved off screen
He did listen to criticism did u watch the video?
@@JaymcJefty that's the point of the draw but realistically, that'll never happen lol
@@asaltyshowing1505 fr
Impressed by this response although you did cut out quite a few points which I think you should have addressed or taken the hit on, but on the ones you did address it was solid. Makes me wonder why that writer was on the response video in the first place. From an outsiders view, the writer looks like to have done very little so far, so you probably shouldn't expect him to know that. That was my only problem with this response, didn't expect this after that catastrophe of an insult-fest response before.
ur washed bro calm down
"Our last update was in June" That was really funny lol
0:01 off topic, but WHY IS THERE A SUBSCRIPTION FOR JACKNJELLIFY??
because based
because based
because based
because based
because based on
Eclipse complaining about personal attacks
Also eclipse: 3:06
dude i donated a loadf to that game thinking it was gonna be so good 😭
He legit showed leaks of the game did you not watch it or sum??
Was it good
@@justpurpled watch it urself
Personally i would say i like it alot
@@dragonmxk1610you cannot say its good without trying it
It's just an opinion of a random youtuber, no need to take it so seriously.
Opinions lead to dramas and that is literally how this started anyway.
This is quite simply a publicity stunt and also a way to save his reputation for acting childish (which mind you was fixed a little but in the video the cracks did show)
My respect for both parties has gone up.
My respect for eclpise's party has lowered even more
@@Lean99999how come? They said a lot of things but most of them were "no no you dont get it" and as good as this response was eclipses points still stand
@@pigit7526 what points? His whole argument was litterally just "50 cents fo a game that they warned us about being in an unfinished state is such a scam"
The mentioned gamepasses that eclipse said that this response video skipped over due to the fact his this videos arguments of it being beta would crumble due to the fact this game has 7 gamepasses? @@Lean99999
Pretty ignorant to say that when both sides have good arguments to each other, whats even both will misunderstand each other because they share dufferent perspectives
11:16 you just ignored eclipses whole point your writer said that "we need the money to pay our developers" he wasn't talking about you needing to get other developers but how yall have a seemingly fixed mindset on how you think that you have to make the game paid access unordered to afford it you have so many options in this situation that money you need to fund your developers should be coming out of your pocket not your players who just want to get a taste of the game yall are making if you don't have th3 funds to pay your developers invest money into skill that will TEACH YOU thoee skills it's not my or any other one of your players responsibilitie to fund YOUR developers I'm disappointed that you think we are just your Guinea, pigs and if you don't have the funds for that maybe you just shouldn't have made the game at this current time and should wait until your financially competent enough to afford a developer team