Great analysis from you master 👍🏻. Can you plz analyse Paul Morphy games . It's much more deep than we all think . He is an attacking genius but also his positional play is exquisite. One positional masterpiece is from his match against Daniel Harwitzz in 1858 where a Dutch game was played by Morphy with the black pieces. Can you plz analyse that game in your channel , it would be great to learn a lot with your analysis. Thank you ❤️
Thank you for your kind words and suggestion. Morphy was actually the first player who came to my mind when I just created the channel. But the problem is that most of his greatest games (including the one you mentioned) have already been analyzed on other channels. But I'll keep your suggestion in mind, and will make a video in case I come across some of his deep games that haven't been covered yet.
A fine tournament with three players, Rubinstein (who took first), Marshall (2nd), and the fellow Polish master, Salwe. It had some interesting games, such as Rubinstein overlooking a mate in one and getting mated by Marshall, and losing on time to Salwe a winning position with a great passed pawn. As to this game, while Marshall was indeed a fine and ingenious player, he tended to play these risky positions where he in the short term appears to have some decent compensation, but positionally might be suffering one or more flaws. It’s perhaps a main reason he lost his title match so decisively the year prior to Lasker- an “over” (if I may) eager desire for an attack at the expense of developmental and/ or his king safety. It was fine calculation by Rubinstein, especially at the end where he coordinated his mating attack in similar fashion to Steinitz’ immortal combination. Excellent work as always, Sir.
Such amazing creativity from both Marshall and Rubinstein! Thank you for your clear analysis! 🙏, Is game from the same Reti book you mentioned in another comment?
Rubinstein was one those "greatest player never to become world champion" players. In terms of positional understanding he sure rivaled Capablanca. From 1908 to 1918 he was clearly always atleast top 5 (if not top 2, behind Capa). From 1912 to 1914 there were negotiations for a Lasker-Rubinstein match but of course WW1 came in the way. After that war, Rubinstein played noticeably weaker and more erratically.
Rubinstein and Marshall was actually almost evenly matched. During their rivalry Rubinstein won 11 times with Marshall winning 9 times. There were many draws. Marshall had more trouble with Lasker, Capablanca and Alekhine.
Sir, a question or two while on the topic of Marshall, if you don’t mind. Do you find your game selections via chess literature? I’m aware that the Armenian chess RUclipsr “Chess with Suren” said he picks games from the vast chess literature available to him in his former USSR country. And are you aware of the game he played with the former World Champion Lasker in Moscow 1925? I read an analysis of it before which mentioned that Marshall set a plethora of traps that Lasker managed to avoid, but that they are very difficult to spot. Only one other RUclipsr (Historical Chess Videos) has covered that game, but he seemed to cover it briefly and made no mention of any traps. I was just curious as I couldn’t really find much else on that game and here in the US chess literature isn’t as extremely abundant, I believe, and I am, as you may recall, a fan of complex chess masters like Alekhine and Marshall. If you don’t have the game anywhere or if you peruse and find games online, then of course, never mind. But just curious and where better to learn than from a channel called “Chess Wisdom” :) Good day, Sir
Yes, Sir, I find the games in chess literature, mostly published in the USSR. Thanks for mentioning this game, 43...Ne3! is beautiful. I looked for it in a couple of Soviet editions on Lasker, but neither of them features it. The only book I found it in, is "Why Lasker Matters" by Soltis. I've just played it through, and indeed, it's a really complicated tactical battle, with lots of traps. Soltis gives lots of different possible variations left behind the scenes. I might make a video on this game after double-checking all these variations with the engine. Even an immodest channel, which had the audacity to call itself "Chess Wisdom", needs the assistance of the iron monster. :) Good day, Sir
@@chesswisdom Okay, thank you. Yes, that was the only place I could find an analysis, too. Glad you like it. Looking forward to it if you make a video on it. And I think your name is very applicable. You break down points very well, share notes from masters, and all the time I see people commenting about how much they learn from you. So honestly not too immodest in my book, especially since you allow the engine to assist you, too. :) Good day
In the pause moment isnt QF5 a better solution? If Qxb7 then the same idea, Nd5, the differece being that the king is not pinned by the queen and you put pressure on the f5 pawn. Then one has to calculate f4, but if white pawn ever takes g5 then great pressure on the f2 square
After Qf5, White can play g4 attacking the queen, after which if Black exchanges the queens, the white pawn will appear on e4 square, and White will take under control the d5 square and get some counter play in the center. And if Black doesn't exchange the queens after g4 and retreats to f7, White can play Rdd1 and double his rooks on the h file creating some unpleasant threats.
this has to be classified as artistic literature to be studied in school. wow what a game
Indeed. I've already placed it on watch later. Very very instructional game. Both sides finding great moves.
What a masterpiece ❤
This is fantastic. You're my new favorite chess creator.
Thank you very much,you bring those games into live, like real battles.
My pleasure.
Best channel about games.
Great analysis from you master 👍🏻. Can you plz analyse Paul Morphy games . It's much more deep than we all think . He is an attacking genius but also his positional play is exquisite. One positional masterpiece is from his match against Daniel Harwitzz in 1858 where a Dutch game was played by Morphy with the black pieces. Can you plz analyse that game in your channel , it would be great to learn a lot with your analysis. Thank you ❤️
Thank you for your kind words and suggestion. Morphy was actually the first player who came to my mind when I just created the channel. But the problem is that most of his greatest games (including the one you mentioned) have already been analyzed on other channels. But I'll keep your suggestion in mind, and will make a video in case I come across some of his deep games that haven't been covered yet.
@@chesswisdom thank you so much master ❤️. Wish you great luck for the future
Excelente análisis.gracias y Saludos.
Awesome game by Ruby, great to learn from them ,best analytical commentary, thanks 🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤
My pleasure.
a very well put together lesson in strategy and the tactics that verified it. positional play might be a good tag
Very instructive, thank you!
My pleasure!
Wow! You explained the game very well! Thank you! I’ll subscribe to your channel
My pleasure! Thanks for subscribing!
Fantastic game, playing with the idea of a rook sacrifice was that much joyful after it was played in the game, thank you for your videos!
My pleasure!
Great commentary
really really perfectly and deeply commented! Congratulations!
Thank you very much!
A fine tournament with three players, Rubinstein (who took first), Marshall (2nd), and the fellow Polish master, Salwe. It had some interesting games, such as Rubinstein overlooking a mate in one and getting mated by Marshall, and losing on time to Salwe a winning position with a great passed pawn.
As to this game, while Marshall was indeed a fine and ingenious player, he tended to play these risky positions where he in the short term appears to have some decent compensation, but positionally might be suffering one or more flaws. It’s perhaps a main reason he lost his title match so decisively the year prior to Lasker- an “over” (if I may) eager desire for an attack at the expense of developmental and/ or his king safety. It was fine calculation by Rubinstein, especially at the end where he coordinated his mating attack in similar fashion to Steinitz’ immortal combination.
Excellent work as always, Sir.
Thank you, Sir. A very interesting review as always.
@@chesswisdom
My pleasure always, Sir.
I have just found this channel......great explanation. Thank you
My pleasure.
Beautiful art.
Beautiful explanation without moving the pieces!
I coulda used a few more pieces moved honestly. Great video as always, but dude Going straight Hikaru with the arrows
Great teaching, thank you.
My pleasure.
Superb! Thank you very much!
My pleasure!
Not just good, but exxelent video😊😊
Such amazing creativity from both Marshall and Rubinstein! Thank you for your clear analysis! 🙏, Is game from the same Reti book you mentioned in another comment?
Thanks for watching! Yes, this game is also from Reti's wonderful book.
Brillante mate, gracias chess wisdom, saludos
My pleasure.
Keep it up bro❤
Rubinstein was one those "greatest player never to become world champion" players. In terms of positional understanding he sure rivaled Capablanca. From 1908 to 1918 he was clearly always atleast top 5 (if not top 2, behind Capa). From 1912 to 1914 there were negotiations for a Lasker-Rubinstein match but of course WW1 came in the way. After that war, Rubinstein played noticeably weaker and more erratically.
Rubinstein and Marshall was actually almost evenly matched. During their rivalry Rubinstein won 11 times with Marshall winning 9 times. There were many draws. Marshall had more trouble with Lasker, Capablanca and Alekhine.
Thanks.
My pleasure.
@@chesswisdom Greetngs from Austria
Rubinstein - a treasure!
Iam big fan of your analysis sir please say sir do you have fide rating sir
Thank you, sir. No, I don't have a FIDE rating.
Sir, a question or two while on the topic of Marshall, if you don’t mind. Do you find your game selections via chess literature? I’m aware that the Armenian chess RUclipsr “Chess with Suren” said he picks games from the vast chess literature available to him in his former USSR country. And are you aware of the game he played with the former World Champion Lasker in Moscow 1925? I read an analysis of it before which mentioned that Marshall set a plethora of traps that Lasker managed to avoid, but that they are very difficult to spot. Only one other RUclipsr (Historical Chess Videos) has covered that game, but he seemed to cover it briefly and made no mention of any traps. I was just curious as I couldn’t really find much else on that game and here in the US chess literature isn’t as extremely abundant, I believe, and I am, as you may recall, a fan of complex chess masters like Alekhine and Marshall.
If you don’t have the game anywhere or if you peruse and find games online, then of course, never mind. But just curious and where better to learn than from a channel called “Chess Wisdom” :)
Good day, Sir
Yes, Sir, I find the games in chess literature, mostly published in the USSR. Thanks for mentioning this game, 43...Ne3! is beautiful. I looked for it in a couple of Soviet editions on Lasker, but neither of them features it. The only book I found it in, is "Why Lasker Matters" by Soltis. I've just played it through, and indeed, it's a really complicated tactical battle, with lots of traps. Soltis gives lots of different possible variations left behind the scenes. I might make a video on this game after double-checking all these variations with the engine. Even an immodest channel, which had the audacity to call itself "Chess Wisdom", needs the assistance of the iron monster. :)
Good day, Sir
@@chesswisdom
Okay, thank you. Yes, that was the only place I could find an analysis, too. Glad you like it. Looking forward to it if you make a video on it.
And I think your name is very applicable. You break down points very well, share notes from masters, and all the time I see people commenting about how much they learn from you. So honestly not too immodest in my book, especially since you allow the engine to assist you, too. :)
Good day
In the pause moment isnt QF5 a better solution? If Qxb7 then the same idea, Nd5, the differece being that the king is not pinned by the queen and you put pressure on the f5 pawn. Then one has to calculate f4, but if white pawn ever takes g5 then great pressure on the f2 square
After Qf5, White can play g4 attacking the queen, after which if Black exchanges the queens, the white pawn will appear on e4 square, and White will take under control the d5 square and get some counter play in the center. And if Black doesn't exchange the queens after g4 and retreats to f7, White can play Rdd1 and double his rooks on the h file creating some unpleasant threats.
i am a big fan and supporter. I wonder what your elo is? i'd say 2100 minimum,right?
Thank you. I haven't participated in FIDE rated tournaments, I'm just a chess enthusiast.
@@chesswisdom you are the alpha ultimate boss. Honestly, keep up! The sky is the limit
Thank you :)
Make a video on Emory Tate games
I find it VERY annoying when the Black pieces are displayed on the bottom.
How do you play chess, then? With a mirror in hand?
Intuition:
1.Kg7 xxx
2.Ng5?
Edit: Omfg I got it. I meant Nd5*. I’m so happy.