Kelo v. City of New London

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 39

  • @MrAaronvt
    @MrAaronvt 12 лет назад +27

    hmm my property 2 final is tomorrow; poor Kelo, at least she will live on forever in the minds of law students and the pages of casebooks

    • @tirughosh
      @tirughosh 4 года назад +1

      Bruh, same but 7 years later

  • @morilea
    @morilea 6 лет назад +37

    "i really hope they choke on the dust" 😹

  • @BearFan09
    @BearFan09 13 лет назад +17

    I absolutely hate this ruling. We need a much stricter interpretation of the constitution if we think that what New London did was ok.

  • @thebootywizard
    @thebootywizard 12 лет назад +13

    A line must be drawn some wheres within our legal system... the Government democracy to "protect" the people is doing just the opposite... America should be better than this...

  • @dmmchugh3714
    @dmmchugh3714 3 года назад +4

    Never think the government will actually defend the individual.

  • @TheGodfather101
    @TheGodfather101 Год назад +1

    When you lose the moral high ground of Maxine waters, it's time reconsider your entire life This the most abhorrent scotus decision in the last 30 years.

  • @Montfortracing
    @Montfortracing 14 лет назад +3

    @jpsartrean How is this a states' rights issue? The fourteenth amendment of the US Constitutiton forbids states to take "life, liberty and property without due process of the law...". Even if the law was legal, that doesn't necessarily means it's good policy.

  • @Crazypower274
    @Crazypower274 15 лет назад +3

    Eminent Domain should have been tossed with all of the other royalist bullshit when the constitution was being written. All of the sovereign immunity crap should have be discarded.

  • @jpsartrean
    @jpsartrean 15 лет назад +1

    This is a STATE'S RIGHTS issue - under the laws of Connecticutt, the state had the power to did what it did... Should they have done this? Assuredly not. But it was - I repeat - WAS - LEGAL. It is the job of the PEOPLE to DEMAND THEIR LEGISLATURES REVOKE/REVISE SUCH LAWS. And you know what?? Now many states have...

  • @EricCanterra
    @EricCanterra 2 года назад

    Not in a trillion years would I ever imagine agreeing with a position that Mad Maxine has taken.

  • @Goobs7
    @Goobs7 13 лет назад +1

    @Concreet420
    Is it true that they eventually turned the land into a landfill? This whole thing is just wrong.

  • @jamesmurphy9426
    @jamesmurphy9426 Год назад

    Seriously revolution now should have happened around 1979

  • @Samonuh
    @Samonuh 12 лет назад

    How is he a hypocrite? Because he is taking advantage of capitalism?

  • @tijojose7966
    @tijojose7966 8 лет назад +3

    #NeverTrump

  • @PInk77W1
    @PInk77W1 13 лет назад

    @CPORet2009 I CANT but obama can