The infamous "Mitchell logic" simultaneously making my brain chase its metaphorical tail while being somehow entertaining and humorous in the process. Cheers Mitchy!
I disagree. That's something that is very right about the world. It gives mankind social adaption skills and basically makes us the fittest species on the planet, because we adapt so well. Now it causes as well an nearly unlimited number of nutjobs, but that's fine. They are not threatening to the existence of the species. They are just backup plans in case that the mainstream is indeed the unfit one for survival. So, consense lost.
This conundrum all boils down to the fact that human society worldwide follows a template of opposing forces. 'The law of the jungle', 'might makes right', or 'the golden rule', if you prefer. Humans are devious.. We have convinced ourselves that we are an 'intelligent species' by virtue of the fact that we have attached sophisticated terminology to primal habits. The financial / political / social systems and tendencies are a particularly good example of this. In a nutshell, we're still apes.. With the same sensibilities and priorities. Apes who believe themselves to be above it all. And as such, we are dysfunctional, violent and primitive. Just like the apes from which we like to seperate ourselves. With our level of technolgy, and yet a complete lack of awareness of this, we are a recipe for disaster. Unless we take an active role in our own evolution from now on and realise that an ape mindset and nuclear technology do not mix.
This is the most centrist thing to exist. The like dislike ratio proves that instead of indirectly arguing against the vagueness of not assuming the problem Mitchell does exactly that because he implies at the end that he is waiting for the public to condemn his view which has so far been not assuming the problem just fantasysing about it.
At the moment I can agree that there are people that might think that there is a concenus that there is something wrong with the world compared to the other times when there was something wrong with the world to some degree, but in reality there may be none which just illustrates my view completely.
If it makes you feel any better- you can abandon the idea of complete consensus and instead go by the 80/20 rule.... While it's true that expressing an idea that's 100% coherent and clear will probably leave you with 0 followers, You can have 80% of the population agreeing on an idea that's 20% coherent! You'd be amazed at how nicely, readily, and differently people will fill in your gaps.
Good points well made. And because there needs to be some disagreement, I'm going to disagree with all of the people that think David's TV shows are funny, because, they're not. So there!
I approve of this message. I disapprove of The Guardian choosing to use their journalistic reputation and outlet to post vacuous videos such as this one. I approve of David Mitchell taking the opportunity to share his thoughts on this matter via a newspaper's video channel. I disapprove of the fact that I am not currently filthy rich, brimming with super powers, and an ageless, unsuffering immortal with perfect teeth.
I would like to express my disapproval, but feel I cannot without being labelled either a 'troll' or 'hater'. You see there's a lot wrong with the world when a hugely socially significant medium such as the internet creates a forum providing the anonymity that allows people to facelessly belittle and slander others for the simple sake of doing so, while on the flip-side they probably feel the are providing comedic service or simply committing a victimless crime, when eventually it creates a heavy cloaking concept, a sort of sticky word turd that one can trow at another another in order to drown out any actual useful advice or 'constructive criticism', and ultimately leads to comments like this...which is just another thing wrong with the world.
I disagree. I'll use this metaphor to explain: Yes, a car can be used to kill people and it produces a lot of negative emissions, but I'd say the world is a much nicer place with automobiles.
I'm an actual Mollusc and I had a fantastic time during most of the ancient pre-jurassic periods of magma. I remember thinking how few things were wrong with the world then, and that view has remained steady through the ages until now. David speaks fluent nonsense with such blithe grace and verisimilitude; it is easy to forget how his disgorge of the purest efluent nonsense is handled with even more exigent aplomb.
On a path of self-annhilation. "maybe civilisations throughout time and the Universe never get to reach or contact each other, because in fact they destroy themselves before they ever can. - Brian Cox
Ironically, I DO approve of the video! That is to say, I genuinely approve of the ironic message the video is conveying. Rather than ironically approving the message and thus disapproving it.
Want some good news? We're making a Comment Is Free video every Wednesday and publishing them 16:00 (GMT). Looking forward to sharing them with all of you!
Not "god"***** He said "God." Small g denotes lesser pantheistic deities. Capital G denotes "THE" God.of monotheistic belief. Trying to be absolutely objective I have to agree, there's an anti God agenda at work here too. I like David Mitchell, but bias is bias, and he is the product of his influences.
Joes WebPresence I don't think god or "God" will mind, since he's busy trying to reach a consensous with a teapot possibly but not probably orbiting somewhere in the kyper belt. I understand he's finding it dificult as the teapot is only a figurative one.
llynellyn As he points out, there are more people now, so even if the average person lives better, there's probably more misery total. There's also more right with the world by the same logic, but that wasn't the point of the video. Then again, you can argue that people not existing is something wrong with the world, given that them existing is better, and so since there's fewer people that don't exist, there is less wrong with the world.
The world is pretty good. Well, it's the best thing there is. Well, unless you think there is something better after it, and therefore you want it to end. Sod it! I won't have consensus until I say there is a lot wrong with the world. NO no no, substitute 'the world' with 'humanity'. Now you've got it.
Hmmm, maybe some things are wrong with the world at the moment. Maybe an orange with a funny wig with his finger on the red button might have something to do with it.
If the red button existed. Sadly I think its more like a phone call of death with said orange reading out a bunch of codes from a nice deep bunker, while all around the world other pricks in bunkers are rattling off codes and a short while later there is a lot of white light a bunch of heat and fire and all of mankind and its various achievements are erased forever... Still if Chernobyl's exclusion zone is anything to go by the world will recover... We are far more catastrophic to wildlife than radiation.
One button - ends the universe - do you press it? Ends all the suffering, but ends all the pleasure too. But there'd be nobody to miss the pleasure. ... anyway... do you press it?
I don't know, good question. On one hand I would like to end the world for selfish reasons, as I know that not existing is less painful than the life I'm currently living . However, I would then feel guilty about all of the future's I might rob people of. In the end I would probably end up procrastinating so long that somebody would come and disarm the button, or something like that.
so.... the world may or may not have a lot of things wrong with it, depending on the point of view and concensus is virtually unacheivable? Is that it?
It's tempting to judge the world and divide it into good aspects and bad aspects but the fact is it's a complex system thus rendering the task impossible. The true engine of improvement is not censorious judgement but spontaneous acts of creation: new ideas, new machines, new movies, etc. Or am I wrong about this? Am I judging the judgers?
I think your right. We should stop trying to fight ideals and introduce better ones that eventually eclipse the bad ideals because the good ideal's will be more successful and attract larger followings. I'd say that's what happening now although at a very slow pace.
Is he basically saying. 'Yes, lets acknowledge there is something wrong but lets not investigate it as it is very complicated and people will get upset?' That would be at the very least, counter productive. Am I missing the point?
I think that's the point, The idea that so many people are just saying 'There is so much wrong with the world' but not actually doing anything because it's so difficult to actually fix it because people are so fixed on their own perception and not the actual problems at hand. I think
I believe it's actually a lot more about hypersensitivity and how it hinders progress. How, no one can even address an issue through fear that it will upset an individual or group, and how it is almost impossible to ever achieve consensus. Highlighting the fact that we need to be less overly sensitive about what we say and do if we are to move forward.
I couldn't agree with you more. Well, I suppose it is possible that I could agree with you more. Had you stated more opinions then there could be more total agreement. Perhaps it's better to say that within the context of the opinions you stated in this video, I couldn't agree with you more. Unless by "agree" we mean not just an alignment of views but the expression of such in which case I could most certainly be more effusive. "I agree, I agree!" I could shout it from the rooftops and post it to every comment section of every site on the web. But by that measure it will always be possible to agree with you more. Even were I to dedicate every waking moment of my life to expressing my agreement with you, there would still be those wasted moments when I'm not awake. I might dream of my agreement with you but given the flexible nature of time within dreams it would surely always be possible to cram in more agreement. No, I think it would be safer to just say that I agree with you.
Read Hack attack.. suddenly I am in love with the Guardian. Your voices too.. I like the subtle tones of your voices. Like you're using your voice as a tool instead of a weapon.
Some people can hide it, but it's harder to hide when you're lying. You must maneuver your blade for a lie, and it's shifting angle will reveal it's position on a starlit night. A true blade cuts faithfully every time in the same direction. Straight down to the facts. Honesty is the shortest rhetorical distance between two points.
Touché David, there is a lot wrong with the world. But when was it not? Now, I'm a sorry pessimistic sod, but even I can see that, among others, wars today have many less casualties than wars in previous decades due to technological and medical advancement, we have progress in sciences and medicine lengthening people's lives, creating economic growth in third world countries by having service centers rerouted there. And by stimulation of the economy they can invest in infrastructure, education and health care etc. So it seems like there is a lot wrong with the world, but it's the same amount it was 50 years ago or 200 years ago in terms of how it affects us personally and our day to day lives.
I stopped listening at about 1:08. I found there was a single broken biscuit left at the bottom of the packet on my desk and I got distracted. I can't be arsed watching this again.
David you could get past so many of these problems by presenting re-definitions. David in order to get things done, you need to let go of ideas having previously being identified or created and then being inherently true. And instead go ahead and understand them as being malleable due to our potential to reclassify ourselves as being in a different position; and thus as viewing things from a different perspective. It's internally correct when you do this, and it doesn't harm the truth one bit, just displays a cleaner and more crisp image. Which is all that our mind's eye can do!
![[#2024MAMA] G-DRAGON - 무제(Untitled, 2014)+POWER+HOME SWEET HOME+뱅뱅뱅+FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox29z5Nf1Uk/mqdefault.jpg)
I disagree with everything this man said...
I disagree!
mindfucking
I disagree with IsaacOrson
Tom Heald lol did anyone else's browser provide a "Translate" button for the above comment?
***** i disagree with your agreement of the complete disagreement of the guy who said he disagreed.
David Mitchell is such a funny and intelligent comedian.
I am not sure if we can reach a consensus on that
Consensus lost..
picklesnorf101 True. I just hope we don't have to talk like that in the future due to all the ppolitical correctnes.
Toby Nott i'm sure we can find a concensus!
+P.G. Burgess I for one, know there's a consensus around here somewhere. But by saying that, I've just lost the yet-found consensus...oh the regress.
Sounds like something out of the Hitchhikers guide to the Galaxy.
In the beginning the Universe was created.
This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
Michael Classic line.
almost, but not quite, entirely unlike Hitchhikers....
the universe won't explode. it that that already, and once was enough
-- Lindybeige (I think)
I was definitely getting a Douglas Adams vibe from this.
Also, man-crush on David Mitchell.
As Stephen Fry remarked: "I've missed your angry logic, David" :)
This is the video that defines David Mitchell the most, and exactly why he is brilliant.
Well said. Hear hear! etc
I disagree. Consensus lost!
I saw him on comedy shows, he's great! This just confused me. A lot.
That one interview where he talks about tax avoidance being a tax on being nice was a pretty good one to show his way of thinking too.
you can see him reading from a queue card
The infamous "Mitchell logic" simultaneously making my brain chase its metaphorical tail while being somehow entertaining and humorous in the process. Cheers Mitchy!
"What's wrong with the world, is other peoples ideas of what's wrong with the world". So true and well put.
I disagree. That's something that is very right about the world. It gives mankind social adaption skills and basically makes us the fittest species on the planet, because we adapt so well.
Now it causes as well an nearly unlimited number of nutjobs, but that's fine. They are not threatening to the existence of the species. They are just backup plans in case that the mainstream is indeed the unfit one for survival.
So, consense lost.
That's numberwang.
As a serial killer I don't agree with this.
I express my approval through the medium of Dance!
I hate dance!
I'm blind and can't enjoy dance! Do it In song!
Ben Hansell Let it in! it's infectious!
whatever jpg How about poetry then?
Some say that poetry is the Dance of words. _Hmm... how poetic_
David Mitchell really put his own spin on this question so perfectly. Great speaker.
First of all things, I find that this man, has quiet the elocution for such a poetic and tongue-turning speech! Good Job, my dear sir.
This aged like fine wine...
We've got another Comment Is Free video coming up today at 16:00, but here's the first in the weekly series with David Mitchell.
DZIĘKUJE
This conundrum all boils down to the fact that human society worldwide follows a template of opposing forces. 'The law of the jungle', 'might makes right', or 'the golden rule', if you prefer.
Humans are devious.. We have convinced ourselves that we are an 'intelligent species' by virtue of the fact that we have attached sophisticated terminology to primal habits. The financial / political / social systems and tendencies are a particularly good example of this.
In a nutshell, we're still apes.. With the same sensibilities and priorities. Apes who believe themselves to be above it all. And as such, we are dysfunctional, violent and primitive. Just like the apes from which we like to seperate ourselves. With our level of technolgy, and yet a complete lack of awareness of this, we are a recipe for disaster.
Unless we take an active role in our own evolution from now on and realise that an ape mindset and nuclear technology do not mix.
Some people disagree because the video was presented by a straight white male. And others dismissed it because it's a Guardian video. Consensus lost.
And some also disagree by applying that others disagree as it was presented by a while male or that it was by the Guardian. Consensus lost once more
And some also disagree by applying that others disagree as it was presented by a while male or that it was by the Guardian. Consensus lost once more
umar ali khan and some, no I'll stop myself
Oh look it's Mark Corrigan having one of his rants and Jez is sneering at him pretending to listen ...
I'M ANGRY FOR SOME REASON
I'M SHOUTING AT YOU!!!!1!!!
I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT
Haha. This is beautiful. It's the best way of making an infinitive statement without actually defining any part of it.
"There are more people than ever. So that might imply a great ate right sum of human pain."
Yep, cheers for that Dave.
2015: a lot of problems in the world.
Coronavirus in 2020: hold my coffee.
This is the most centrist thing to exist. The like dislike ratio proves that instead of indirectly arguing against the vagueness of not assuming the problem Mitchell does exactly that because he implies at the end that he is waiting for the public to condemn his view which has so far been not assuming the problem just fantasysing about it.
At the moment I can agree that there are people that might think that there is a concenus that there is something wrong with the world compared to the other times when there was something wrong with the world to some degree, but in reality there may be none which just illustrates my view completely.
If it makes you feel any better- you can abandon the idea of complete consensus and instead go by the 80/20 rule....
While it's true that expressing an idea that's 100% coherent and clear will probably leave you with 0 followers,
You can have 80% of the population agreeing on an idea that's 20% coherent!
You'd be amazed at how nicely, readily, and differently people will fill in your gaps.
Good points well made.
And because there needs to be some disagreement, I'm going to disagree with all of the people that think David's TV shows are funny, because, they're not. So there!
Watching this in 2020. We had no idea back then...
I approve of this message. I disapprove of The Guardian choosing to use their journalistic reputation and outlet to post vacuous videos such as this one. I approve of David Mitchell taking the opportunity to share his thoughts on this matter via a newspaper's video channel. I disapprove of the fact that I am not currently filthy rich, brimming with super powers, and an ageless, unsuffering immortal with perfect teeth.
I never watch Ads. This one was good. Positive comment
I would like to express my disapproval, but feel I cannot without being labelled either a 'troll' or 'hater'. You see there's a lot wrong with the world when a hugely socially significant medium such as the internet creates a forum providing the anonymity that allows people to facelessly belittle and slander others for the simple sake of doing so, while on the flip-side they probably feel the are providing comedic service or simply committing a victimless crime, when eventually it creates a heavy cloaking concept, a sort of sticky word turd that one can trow at another another in order to drown out any actual useful advice or 'constructive criticism', and ultimately leads to comments like this...which is just another thing wrong with the world.
I disagree. I'll use this metaphor to explain: Yes, a car can be used to kill people and it produces a lot of negative emissions, but I'd say the world is a much nicer place with automobiles.
Troll! Hater! =O
Aimee Coleman it just makes people honest. and people are assholes.
It's really just a joke
Aimee Coleman Now you dont know if they are trolling you by pretending to be oblivious to your humour. Poes law, thats whats wrong with the world.
I'm an actual Mollusc and I had a fantastic time during most of the ancient pre-jurassic periods of magma. I remember thinking how few things were wrong with the world then, and that view has remained steady through the ages until now. David speaks fluent nonsense with such blithe grace and verisimilitude; it is easy to forget how his disgorge of the purest efluent nonsense is handled with even more exigent aplomb.
I can say this for him, David Mitchell is a clever clogs.
On a path of self-annhilation. "maybe civilisations throughout time and the Universe never get to reach or contact each other, because in fact they destroy themselves before they ever can. - Brian Cox
You had me at "vacuous internet video"...
Ironically, I DO approve of the video! That is to say, I genuinely approve of the ironic message the video is conveying. Rather than ironically approving the message and thus disapproving it.
It just goes to show, you can never be too careful.
David Mitchell is the idle narrator for HHGTG. Not sure how that thought germinated in my mind, but it did and here you go in all of your faces.
I genuinely disagree due to a disbelief in the existence of the concept of 'wrong' as a measurable trait. Still loved this though.
So you would say cold-blooded murder is not 'wrong' as such but maybe regrettable? Or unfortunate? (No sarcasm intended I'm genuinely curious).
Jag giello Leave us out of your argument mate.
so how do you measure the wrongness of the concept of wrong?
Want some good news? We're making a Comment Is Free video every Wednesday and publishing them 16:00 (GMT). Looking forward to sharing them with all of you!
Keep on pushing your anti God agenda - lets see how far you get. Mitchell is just a puppet.
***** "Anti God agenda"? Being atheist isn't an agenda,it's a viewpoint.
Not "god"***** He said "God."
Small g denotes lesser pantheistic deities. Capital G denotes "THE" God.of monotheistic belief.
Trying to be absolutely objective I have to agree, there's an anti God agenda at work here too. I like David Mitchell, but bias is bias, and he is the product of his influences.
Anti God or anti religion?
Joes WebPresence I don't think god or "God" will mind, since he's busy trying to reach a consensous with a teapot possibly but not probably orbiting somewhere in the kyper belt. I understand he's finding it dificult as the teapot is only a figurative one.
The absence of David Mitchell's soap box is one of the things wrong with the world. :P
That was an awesome show!
"public spirited murder spree" #phraseoftheday
Less than ever, it's just that today we know more than ever about what's going on in the world so it seems scary.
llynellyn As he points out, there are more people now, so even if the average person lives better, there's probably more misery total. There's also more right with the world by the same logic, but that wasn't the point of the video.
Then again, you can argue that people not existing is something wrong with the world, given that them existing is better, and so since there's fewer people that don't exist, there is less wrong with the world.
I lost track of what he was saying by 1 minute in but It's David Mitchell so I stayed...
i aprove the message... i guess?.
Holy cow-batman, Mitchell predicted Donald Trumps victory back in 2014! There he is, @ 1:57!
Stefan Pellas Don't quote me on this, but I'm. pretty sure Trump was alive waaaaaay back in 2014
Stefan Pellas
This is definitely a comment expressing approval.
The world is pretty good. Well, it's the best thing there is. Well, unless you think there is something better after it, and therefore you want it to end. Sod it! I won't have consensus until I say there is a lot wrong with the world. NO no no, substitute 'the world' with 'humanity'. Now you've got it.
David Johnson The world is crap. Now space, that's the place to be.
This comment is purely expressing approval.
I'd vote for this man.
Learned something new today, The "Mitchell human screwedness scale". Love it : )
I enjoyed that immensely, thank you David
Well, I'm offended. Somehow.
There's a lot wrong with the world at the moment..
No there isn't.
Hmmm, maybe some things are wrong with the world at the moment. Maybe an orange with a funny wig with his finger on the red button might have something to do with it.
If the red button existed. Sadly I think its more like a phone call of death with said orange reading out a bunch of codes from a nice deep bunker, while all around the world other pricks in bunkers are rattling off codes and a short while later there is a lot of white light a bunch of heat and fire and all of mankind and its various achievements are erased forever... Still if Chernobyl's exclusion zone is anything to go by the world will recover... We are far more catastrophic to wildlife than radiation.
One button - ends the universe - do you press it?
Ends all the suffering, but ends all the pleasure too.
But there'd be nobody to miss the pleasure.
...
anyway... do you press it?
umm no?
I don't know, good question. On one hand I would like to end the world for selfish reasons, as I know that not existing is less painful than the life I'm currently living . However, I would then feel guilty about all of the future's I might rob people of. In the end I would probably end up procrastinating so long that somebody would come and disarm the button, or something like that.
there are too many stupid people in the comment section trying to be as funny, witty and intelligent as the man in the video.
***** 😁😁😁😁
Pravoizavlijesvijeta You are not one of them.
To be fair he does encourage them to do so in the last line.
I think you lost the consensus.
This is how my head works...down the rabbit hole we go.
The statement about the comments at the end made me howl with laughter. Who said sarcasm was a low form of wit?
That. Inside my brain. Every time I want to say something about something worth while. Then I don´t bother.
I could listen to David Mitchell rant for 8 consecutive hours.
I agree. I think.
Bah, we are better than ever.
theres a lot wrong wrong with the world at the moment, very true, i hope that reminds viewers to be grateful for what is good in our lives
so.... the world may or may not have a lot of things wrong with it, depending on the point of view and concensus is virtually unacheivable?
Is that it?
Nothing could be simpler!
YES IT COULD!
*Expression of approval*
It's tempting to judge the world and divide it into good aspects and bad aspects but the fact is it's a complex system thus rendering the task impossible. The true engine of improvement is not censorious judgement but spontaneous acts of creation: new ideas, new machines, new movies, etc. Or am I wrong about this? Am I judging the judgers?
I think your right. We should stop trying to fight ideals and introduce better ones that eventually eclipse the bad ideals because the good ideal's will be more successful and attract larger followings. I'd say that's what happening now although at a very slow pace.
I love David Mitchell more than words can describe. *ROUND OF APPLAUSE*
That's the art of saying a lot without saying anything.
Jeez, I click on this video right now because the title describes how I feel and then realise it was made three years ago...
Man, I would love a conversation with him.
David Mitchell is a comedic genius!
David Mitchell is brilliant. Cheers me up for the day 😄
I'm in love with this man.
I'd be satisfied with hoping the world won't get worse. I think it's wildly optimistic to think there's any possibility it could get better.
Thanks for the info m8
Is he basically saying.
'Yes, lets acknowledge there is something wrong but lets not investigate it as it is very complicated and people will get upset?'
That would be at the very least, counter productive.
Am I missing the point?
I think that's the point, The idea that so many people are just saying 'There is so much wrong with the world' but not actually doing anything because it's so difficult to actually fix it because people are so fixed on their own perception and not the actual problems at hand.
I think
I believe it's actually a lot more about hypersensitivity and how it hinders progress.
How, no one can even address an issue through fear that it will upset an individual or group, and how it is almost impossible to ever achieve consensus. Highlighting the fact that we need to be less overly sensitive about what we say and do if we are to move forward.
It's a joke. Of course it doesn't make any sense. David Mitchell is a comedian.
2014 was quite good looking back.
Comment expressing approval
Oh yay! It's Mitchell's angry logic again! haha, love it!
I couldn't agree with you more.
Well, I suppose it is possible that I could agree with you more. Had you stated more opinions then there could be more total agreement. Perhaps it's better to say that within the context of the opinions you stated in this video, I couldn't agree with you more.
Unless by "agree" we mean not just an alignment of views but the expression of such in which case I could most certainly be more effusive. "I agree, I agree!" I could shout it from the rooftops and post it to every comment section of every site on the web. But by that measure it will always be possible to agree with you more. Even were I to dedicate every waking moment of my life to expressing my agreement with you, there would still be those wasted moments when I'm not awake. I might dream of my agreement with you but given the flexible nature of time within dreams it would surely always be possible to cram in more agreement.
No, I think it would be safer to just say that I agree with you.
I am offended when you say 'alot' wrong with the world. What if there is moderately little wrong with the world.
Nice to know that, that's finally sorted out ... or not ...
I hereby express approval.
Read Hack attack.. suddenly I am in love with the Guardian. Your voices too.. I like the subtle tones of your voices.
Like you're using your voice as a tool instead of a weapon.
Some people can hide it, but it's harder to hide when you're lying. You must maneuver your blade for a lie, and it's shifting angle will reveal it's position on a starlit night.
A true blade cuts faithfully every time in the same direction. Straight down to the facts. Honesty is the shortest rhetorical distance between two points.
Touché David, there is a lot wrong with the world. But when was it not? Now, I'm a sorry pessimistic sod, but even I can see that, among others, wars today have many less casualties than wars in previous decades due to technological and medical advancement, we have progress in sciences and medicine lengthening people's lives, creating economic growth in third world countries by having service centers rerouted there. And by stimulation of the economy they can invest in infrastructure, education and health care etc. So it seems like there is a lot wrong with the world, but it's the same amount it was 50 years ago or 200 years ago in terms of how it affects us personally and our day to day lives.
Excellent 10/10 for serial killers.
This meets with my approval.
You said a mouthful.
Mesut Ozil's let himself go.
We need a lot more of this... complete the thoughts... connect the dots... but bring your dictionary... not you pictionary...
Mainstream politicians summed up in one video.
100% approval
I stopped listening at about 1:08. I found there was a single broken biscuit left at the bottom of the packet on my desk and I got distracted. I can't be arsed watching this again.
3 years old? There are way more things wrong with the world now...
I now agree
I disapprove of non-specificity. It's a waste of space
we live so long now, we are so well educted now, there are more of us now than ever.
David you could get past so many of these problems by presenting re-definitions.
David in order to get things done, you need to let go of ideas having previously being identified or created and then being inherently true. And instead go ahead and understand them as being malleable due to our potential to reclassify ourselves as being in a different position; and thus as viewing things from a different perspective. It's internally correct when you do this, and it doesn't harm the truth one bit, just displays a cleaner and more crisp image. Which is all that our mind's eye can do!
Excellent
I hereby express my approval.
I feel offended!
I don't know why!
Now I feel more offended because I don't know why!
brilliant. everyone can agree with this
What's all this I hear about cereal killers? Why would anyone want to kill a breakfast food?
What's that? Never mind.