father, anointing, prayer, spirit, woo woo......there is no evidence that turtles hold up the earth and are in turn held up by other turtles. There's no such thing as a "devout" atheist. Not believing Bronze Age mythology is THE default position everyone is born into. There's no such thing as an evolution"ist" either. Only the religious lunatics assert that something came from nothing via a magical incantation from an invisible "being"
Check out his school of make believe where one can purchase a masters degree for $15,000, that isn't recognized by anyone real. Imaginary diplomas for make believe professions in theology. This guy is a doctor like the many other homeopathic whoredom practitioners of our time.
I am an atheist. You are a Christian. Which kind of Christian are you? Catholic? Protestant? Mormon? Jehovah's Witness? Some form of Evangelical/Fundamentalist? Whichever one you embrace, what makes you think that your particular form of Christianity is the right one? I'm sure it's because of the particular way that you and others who share that with you interpret certain passages of the Bible. That's the same reason why there are so many different kinds of Christianity today, because people like Martin Luther, John Calvin, and so many others had their own way of seeing things. So I ask again, what makes you think that yours is the "right one", when any other kind of Christian will say THEIRS is the right one?
We all think our specific views are the 'right' ones. HOW Christ saves or interacts or is in and of Himself is irrelevant to WHETHER it is more likely that the main tenets of Christianity as we see in the early creeds which illustrates basic theistic views universally accepted by MOST religions, albeit differing words and its historical relevance of an incarnation, makes your point irrelevant.
@@mountbrocken the existence of heretics early in the church kinda squashes your claim. Clearly there were disagreements if they came up with a word to call those who disagreed. Like your use of the word MOST kinda nullifies the word universal. These are opposite. Universal means all, most means not all.
There is a FALSE and a GENUINE version of everything in existence. This of course also includes churches claiming to be Christian churches, when only ONE church, in fact, can possibly be authorized by CHRIST himself, because he introduced it by himself. I'm surely not going to get in an argument with idiot people who know next to nothing, because it's of course a damn waste of time. However, there are MANY good Christian churches nevertheless ... and there are also Christian churches which border on the verifiably Satanic. The basic problem with atheists is that they seek NO truth, because they believe they can discern truth and discover truth entirely on their own in every instance. Well, guess what? It's just is NOT so - And by the way ... the Catholic church is BY FAR the most evil abomination on earth among Christian churches. Oh, the irony, the grand irony . . .
Religious faith is Not a Path to Truth its a path of self and mass delusion. The Incredulity of faith based Claims is just that a litany of superstitions... 🎉
Only thing it takes to be an atheist is not to be convinced by the existence of a god or gods, no faith required here. If someone can explain to me how a being can both be timeless and conscious (for example, make decisions without the intervention of time), then I may consider the god hypothethis not completely illogical.
By your logic, if I ever find myself in a court of law I could bring my diary on which I wrote “I didn’t do it” as overwhelming evidence of my innocence.
Even if there is a god, this bizarre story as what's portrayed in Christianity and the father/son/spirit make no sense whatsoever. It's truly fascinating and extremely mind-boggling that anyone can sit there and believe any of it. It's simply astonishing and also frightening to live in a world where nearly two billion people believe that and more billions believe other nonsense. Also, what this guy's saying is simply not true. There is no evidence for god, let alone overwhelming evidence. It's thought experiments, not objective evidence. 4:55
Atheism is NOT a religion. The Bible is NOT evidence. So, when you quote verses from the Bible, you are not quoting evidence. ALL of your arguments are a non-starter. You try to look at the real evidence. Please. The only thing i can actually agree to is that there is no evidence for a creator.
@@nicolasandre9886 They're in such a tight thought bubble that they even tend to copy little vocal patterns. They do it all of the time. "Evidences" is another example.
you don't understand the meaning of the word evidence, buddy. and you really should put some effort into learning about evolution. your understanding of the subject is demonstrably poor.
Maybe being an Atheist is absurd. But followoing a man-made religion (like Christianity and Islam) with man-made morals and man-made mythologies and believing it is the only right one and all other humans shall follow that religion also is much more absurd. As a Deist I send you a lot human love :)
This talk could have been cut to five minutes if all the repeats were cut out. However for as many times as he said overwhelming I remain underwhelmed.
Marvel comics prove that spider man exists. And i can prove it because the comics talk of spiders and photographs and new york.. it speaks of other creatures, places and things that exist in the world around us.
We use the word “creator” only because we consider what we see to be “creation.” When we stop calling everything a creation, the creator need not exist at all. Why assume that something created us? We simply exist: not creation, but existence. Then what brought us into existence? "An existator"? Besides, why is a god necessary? Why do we claim that whatever started everything must be conscious? It makes no more sense than the big bang, in fact, it makes even less sense.
This video is nothing more than a bunch of outdated arguments and logical fallacies that have been refuted countless times and neither of which is evidence for the existence of any gods. Try something new because using the same stupid arguments over and over again does not help you.
This guy from the start goes on to present fallacious arguments. Can't wait to hear the rest of this video. It's starting off with personal incredulity.
im 12 and i go and have been going to different Christian schools for the past 12 yrs of my life so i know the bible pretty well and i can say someone of the stuff that people say about atheists are not true and one of them is "atheism is a religion" atheism is the belief there is no God and theism is the belief in no god. need i say more... also (i know that people had said this before) quoting the bible to prove the bible is circular reasoning and wont progress the conversation any farther than the circle you got us in. aka use outside sources and not the bible. next "point" you say is evolution first of all im not a biologist so watch some debates or vids but i can say scientists dont believe nothing created someone there are incredibly complicated methods at which life started so research it ig or something. pretty sure he watched the average apologetics yt channel and pulled the most disproven points he could pulled from them, so non-life created life. once again im not a biologist but im pretty sure thats happening. when pregnant woman eat food some of that non-living food gets used to make the baby therefore non-living things (food) can create living things. (babies) ok so there are like 10 different things you say so im just gonna say other yt-ers have debunked these points before so look for them. ok so once you're done rambling you say "you dont see a cat becoming a dog..." god damn it... you got me... i dont know how to answer this absolutely stupid question that makes you sound like you didnt do a sunday and the 5 page research paper is due monday morning amount of research. ITS BECAUSE IT TAKES MILLIONS AND MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF YEARS TO MAKE A NEW SPECIES!!! YOU CANT JUST GET YOU DOGS PUT THEM IN THE SAME ROOM AND SOME MONTHS LATER GET A BRANDNEW SPECIES OF DOG YOU DELINQUENT!!!! that one gets me mad every time. uh wdym there no one cell organisms i literally just went to chatgpt and got 5 single cell organisms. amoeba, paramecium, euglena, bacteria (prokaryotes), yeast (literally makes bread.) alr buddy ive had enough of your lying. HAVE YOU HEARD OF SAHELANTHROPUS TCHADENSIS, ARDIPITHECUS RAMIDUS, AUSTRALOPITHECUS AFARENSIS, AUSTRALOPITHECUS AFRICANUS, HOMO HABILIS, HOMO ERECTUS, HOMO HEIDELBERGENSIS, HOMO NEANDERTHALENSIS, HOMO SAPIENS IDALTU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm so happy to read your comments and know that a 12 year-old sees through the apologists so thoroughly. I'm glad you made it out of all those Christian schools with your mind and integrity intact. Once you dump all the religious mumbo jumbo, your mind is free. Good luck with the teenage years. They can be rough, but keep on questioning EVERYTHING!
("atheism is the belief there is no God and theism is the belief in no god.") gonna fix it for you. :) Atheism is the non-acceptance of the god-claim. Theism is the acceptance of the god-claim. .
@@bootskanchelsis3337 I think that person mistyped, or was a little confused but I could understand what was meant. But I was a little confused if they are a theist or an atheist. The letter "a" signifies without. Like asymptomatic vs symptomatic etc. Good corrections, though.
If you are able to use the sacred text of the religion in question to prove the existence of that particular god then, by that logic, all sacred texts are true and all sacred texts would be allowed to be used as texts which prove the existence of their particular god. This argument is flawed for self-evident reasons UNLESS the argument that you’re making is that all sacred texts ARE true, which is a Hindu belief (all paths lead to godhead). At best your argument is in favor of Hinduism. At worst it proves the absurdity of belief based on a book written by peasants during the Bronze Age.
Hello Ray (if I may call you Ray), I am agnostic (used to be Christian for most of my life), and I must say that listening to you was quite soothing. You seem to genuinely care about other people in your prayers and talks, and I appreciate it a lot. I believe we need more civilized discourse motivated by care for others. However, I also don't believe in a theistic God. I can't offer much in terms of academic prowess, but hopefully, I could hold up a decent conversation about some of the topics you mentioned as a physics student who’s been focusing on discovering theology over the last couple of years. Would you be willing to have a quick discussion with me about God, either on air or offline-whichever you prefer? I would definitely benefit from such an opportunity, and hopefully, you might too if you would indulge me. What do you say? Would you be willing to have a civil discussion with a student passionate about learning about God and the world around us? In any case, thank you, and have a blessed day.
Are you convinced that 'Brahman' exists. Well, I think the same about YOUR god. BTW: You know that Lying won't get you to your heaven, right? And you do that overwhelmingly here.
Over the past 50+ years, I have read six versions of the Bible in their entireties. Reading the Bible was highly instrumental in my becoming an atheist.
@14:45 "Look at the sky! Look at the clouds! There's incredible evidence for god! Amazing evidence for god !" The sky and the clouds are evidence that the earth has an atmosphere. What's amazing that a grown man is this simple minded. There's a reason the bible says that "you must come before god as if like a child" (or something to that extent). It outright admits that any intelligent person would have to check their brain at the door to buy any of this b.s.
If I had a nickel for every time I heard the word "overwhelming." Really kind of disappointing because I was wanting to hear some actual evidence other than just being told to go out and look around. If a single individual made the claim that 500 people saw something then that does not automatically give you 500 witnesses. You have to trust the one single individual didn't make something up. That's pretty hard to see that as "overwhelming."
'An intelligent person will intelligently and objectively look at evidence.' What should we conclude when it is obvious that you have *not* looked at the evidence for any of the scientific theories you mention?
You really messed it up this time lmao. The irony of your claims has finally reached the threshold where your comment section flooded with atheists to mock and belittle you.
Constantly repeating the phrase "the evidence for god is overwhelming" without citing any actual evidence (bible verses do not constitute evidence) is not evidence
That takes an act of God. Your's is actually a good question. I feel as though it may be asked in a mocking fashion, hard to tell from such a short question.
@@fuzzycounsellor9147 befast1973-g2f asks an excellent question. No one "believes" in atheism. Atheism is a belief as much as not collecting stamps is a hobby ... which is to say not at all.
@@rickmartin7596 Is that what @befast1973-g2f is saying? A-theo; No God or negation of God ist; one that adheres to or *advocates* a (specified) doctrine or system or code of behavior So you saying it isn't a belief is dishonest or ignorant. You believe there is no God. It is not a neutral position. I could care less how you dress this up, there are 2 choices yes or no, you are making a choice based on thinking though the evidence. So tell me, do you believe in God/a god/gods/supreme being? Either way, you believe it.
My goodness not 2 minutes in and the disingenuity has already started. But then the disingenuity is right there in the title. The absurdity of atheism. Nope. It's the only rational position to take a there is no objective evidence for a divine being. You have faith. That is neither objective nor rational. To believe in something you have no empirical evidence to prove it exists and worship that non-existent being is irrational and absurd. And yet you expect me to believe that an omni-omni being expects me to know and love it when all it has to show is a book of contradictions. Such a being could and should do better than the convoluted narrative of the contrarian testaments of a humanly selected anthology.
Let me just see if I understand your specific brand of delulu... 1. God exists because the buybull says so. 2. The buybull is true because god inspired its authorship. 3 (actually 1 again). We know god inspired it because the buybull says so. and round and round we go. Sorry my guy but if the buybull is evendence for god's existence then god and his existence can't be used to support the buybull's validity.
Creationists have had their day in court and were torn to bits, just what are you even talking about. Right from the start you lie. Is there no commandment for such? Behe hasn't regained consciousness even still, I shouldn't wonder. Lying is very poor form old boy, very poor indeed. Shame on you!
So wrong in so many ways. It did make me laugh so that's nice. Let me ask you, can you see grass grow? Why not, it does grow right? Do you see your child get older each day, why not. Time scale, and arguing evolution is pointless now because evolution is a fact it is not just a theory even though the word theories used it is a fact like gravity is a fact germ theory is a fact. So anybody that disputes evolution is obviously an idiot they don't want to accept the truth. And ask yourself this if you need a God to create the universe who created God. And this guy talking is an atheist because he doesn't believe in all the other gods
When he began by saying that "it takes a lot of faith to be an atheist", i just thought "well, there's your mistake to think about".
Yes, refusing to play with imaginary friends is so absurd.
This is a rare occurrence of a comment section not being theistic on a theistic video
Even theists are embarrassed by him
father, anointing, prayer, spirit, woo woo......there is no evidence that turtles hold up the earth and are in turn held up by other turtles. There's no such thing as a "devout" atheist. Not believing Bronze Age mythology is THE default position everyone is born into. There's no such thing as an evolution"ist" either. Only the religious lunatics assert that something came from nothing via a magical incantation from an invisible "being"
Used the bible as evidence then arguments from ignorance.
Thank you for the recap, now I don't have to listen to it. 😂
Check out his school of make believe where one can purchase a masters degree for $15,000, that isn't recognized by anyone real. Imaginary diplomas for make believe professions in theology. This guy is a doctor like the many other homeopathic whoredom practitioners of our time.
I am an atheist. You are a Christian. Which kind of Christian are you? Catholic? Protestant? Mormon? Jehovah's Witness? Some form of Evangelical/Fundamentalist? Whichever one you embrace, what makes you think that your particular form of Christianity is the right one? I'm sure it's because of the particular way that you and others who share that with you interpret certain passages of the Bible. That's the same reason why there are so many different kinds of Christianity today, because people like Martin Luther, John Calvin, and so many others had their own way of seeing things. So I ask again, what makes you think that yours is the "right one", when any other kind of Christian will say THEIRS is the right one?
We all think our specific views are the 'right' ones. HOW Christ saves or interacts or is in and of Himself is irrelevant to WHETHER it is more likely that the main tenets of Christianity as we see in the early creeds which illustrates basic theistic views universally accepted by MOST religions, albeit differing words and its historical relevance of an incarnation, makes your point irrelevant.
@@mountbrocken the existence of heretics early in the church kinda squashes your claim. Clearly there were disagreements if they came up with a word to call those who disagreed.
Like your use of the word MOST kinda nullifies the word universal. These are opposite. Universal means all, most means not all.
There is a FALSE and a GENUINE version of everything in existence. This of course also includes churches claiming to be Christian churches, when only ONE church, in fact, can possibly be authorized by CHRIST himself, because he introduced it by himself.
I'm surely not going to get in an argument with idiot people who know next to nothing, because it's of course a damn waste of time. However, there are MANY good Christian churches nevertheless ... and there are also Christian churches which border on the verifiably Satanic. The basic problem with atheists is that they seek NO truth, because they believe they can discern truth and discover truth entirely on their own in every instance. Well, guess what? It's just is NOT so -
And by the way ... the Catholic church is BY FAR the most evil abomination on earth among Christian churches. Oh, the irony, the grand irony . . .
Paul and peter hateful each other
I agree there is no evidence for a creator.
It takes absolutely no faith to be an atheist. Just as it takes no faith to not believe I have fairies living under rocks in my backyard.
@@Hectorheroic amen
@@Hectorheroic hallelujah!
The adsurdity of theism
Religious faith is Not a Path to Truth its a path of self and mass delusion. The Incredulity of faith based Claims is just that a litany of superstitions... 🎉
Only thing it takes to be an atheist is not to be convinced by the existence of a god or gods, no faith required here.
If someone can explain to me how a being can both be timeless and conscious (for example, make decisions without the intervention of time), then I may consider the god hypothethis not completely illogical.
By your logic, if I ever find myself in a court of law I could bring my diary on which I wrote “I didn’t do it” as overwhelming evidence of my innocence.
@@UZiBLASTER7 totally wrong. This piece of document ,of self serving nature, cannot be produced as evidence
Even if there is a god, this bizarre story as what's portrayed in Christianity and the father/son/spirit make no sense whatsoever. It's truly fascinating and extremely mind-boggling that anyone can sit there and believe any of it. It's simply astonishing and also frightening to live in a world where nearly two billion people believe that and more billions believe other nonsense. Also, what this guy's saying is simply not true. There is no evidence for god, let alone overwhelming evidence. It's thought experiments, not objective evidence. 4:55
Religion. Because thinking is hard.
@@tongleekwan1324 Exactly my point
Atheism is NOT a religion. The Bible is NOT evidence. So, when you quote verses from the Bible, you are not quoting evidence. ALL of your arguments are a non-starter. You try to look at the real evidence. Please. The only thing i can actually agree to is that there is no evidence for a creator.
Atheism is a religion because you belive there is no god.
Why do Christian apologists always say "cre-a-TOR"?
That's the 'Todd Friel' pronunciation I suppose.
@@nicolasandre9886 They're in such a tight thought bubble that they even tend to copy little vocal patterns. They do it all of the time. "Evidences" is another example.
you don't understand the meaning of the word evidence, buddy. and you really should put some effort into learning about evolution. your understanding of the subject is demonstrably poor.
Maybe being an Atheist is absurd.
But followoing a man-made religion (like Christianity and Islam)
with man-made morals and man-made mythologies and
believing it is the only right one and all other humans shall follow that religion also
is much more absurd.
As a Deist I send you a lot human love :)
using a religious scripture as a material was a prominent form of arrogance !
This talk could have been cut to five minutes if all the repeats were cut out. However for as many times as he said overwhelming I remain underwhelmed.
There are no tenants of atheism. That's like saying, "...the leader of the anarchists."
Marvel comics prove that spider man exists. And i can prove it because the comics talk of spiders and photographs and new york.. it speaks of other creatures, places and things that exist in the world around us.
We are absolutely not teaching our children there is no God. We are leaving the Gap in the model and letting them think for themselves.
We use the word “creator” only because we consider what we see to be “creation.” When we stop calling everything a creation, the creator need not exist at all. Why assume that something created us? We simply exist: not creation, but existence. Then what brought us into existence? "An existator"?
Besides, why is a god necessary? Why do we claim that whatever started everything must be conscious? It makes no more sense than the big bang, in fact, it makes even less sense.
Invisible beings are a logical fallacy, period. Why does this need to be reminded?
This video is nothing more than a bunch of outdated arguments and logical fallacies that have been refuted countless times and neither of which is evidence for the existence of any gods. Try something new because using the same stupid arguments over and over again does not help you.
You are a creationist and you say that atheists don't look at the evidence. Lol. That's absurd.
He reflects so hard that he no longer knows where he stands.
This guy from the start goes on to present fallacious arguments. Can't wait to hear the rest of this video. It's starting off with personal incredulity.
"How does a tree know when to shed its leaves". How does God know when to make a tree?
He doesn't, he made plants before he made the sun.
im 12 and i go and have been going to different Christian schools for the past 12 yrs of my life so i know the bible pretty well and i can say someone of the stuff that people say about atheists are not true and one of them is "atheism is a religion" atheism is the belief there is no God and theism is the belief in no god. need i say more... also (i know that people had said this before) quoting the bible to prove the bible is circular reasoning and wont progress the conversation any farther than the circle you got us in. aka use outside sources and not the bible. next "point" you say is evolution first of all im not a biologist so watch some debates or vids but i can say scientists dont believe nothing created someone there are incredibly complicated methods at which life started so research it ig or something. pretty sure he watched the average apologetics yt channel and pulled the most disproven points he could pulled from them, so non-life created life. once again im not a biologist but im pretty sure thats happening. when pregnant woman eat food some of that non-living food gets used to make the baby therefore non-living things (food) can create living things. (babies) ok so there are like 10 different things you say so im just gonna say other yt-ers have debunked these points before so look for them. ok so once you're done rambling you say "you dont see a cat becoming a dog..." god damn it... you got me... i dont know how to answer this absolutely stupid question that makes you sound like you didnt do a sunday and the 5 page research paper is due monday morning amount of research. ITS BECAUSE IT TAKES MILLIONS AND MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF YEARS TO MAKE A NEW SPECIES!!! YOU CANT JUST GET YOU DOGS PUT THEM IN THE SAME ROOM AND SOME MONTHS LATER GET A BRANDNEW SPECIES OF DOG YOU DELINQUENT!!!! that one gets me mad every time. uh wdym there no one cell organisms i literally just went to chatgpt and got 5 single cell organisms. amoeba, paramecium, euglena, bacteria (prokaryotes), yeast (literally makes bread.) alr buddy ive had enough of your lying. HAVE YOU HEARD OF SAHELANTHROPUS TCHADENSIS, ARDIPITHECUS RAMIDUS, AUSTRALOPITHECUS AFARENSIS, AUSTRALOPITHECUS AFRICANUS, HOMO HABILIS, HOMO ERECTUS, HOMO HEIDELBERGENSIS, HOMO NEANDERTHALENSIS, HOMO SAPIENS IDALTU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm so happy to read your comments and know that a 12 year-old sees through the apologists so thoroughly. I'm glad you made it out of all those Christian schools with your mind and integrity intact. Once you dump all the religious mumbo jumbo, your mind is free. Good luck with the teenage years. They can be rough, but keep on questioning EVERYTHING!
Pretty sweet comment!
("atheism is the belief there is no God and theism is the belief in no god.")
gonna fix it for you. :)
Atheism is the non-acceptance of the god-claim.
Theism is the acceptance of the god-claim.
.
@@bootskanchelsis3337 I think that person mistyped, or was a little confused but I could understand what was meant. But I was a little confused if they are a theist or an atheist. The letter "a" signifies without. Like asymptomatic vs symptomatic etc.
Good corrections, though.
Tldr: Look at the trees, aint they sumfin.
I don't understand stuff so it can't be true.
If you are able to use the sacred text of the religion in question to prove the existence of that particular god then, by that logic, all sacred texts are true and all sacred texts would be allowed to be used as texts which prove the existence of their particular god. This argument is flawed for self-evident reasons UNLESS the argument that you’re making is that all sacred texts ARE true, which is a Hindu belief (all paths lead to godhead).
At best your argument is in favor of Hinduism. At worst it proves the absurdity of belief based on a book written by peasants during the Bronze Age.
The evidence for a god is overwhelming.....yet you never listed any evidence
He just tries to disprove Evolution. And fails miserably.
BTW: The overwhelming majority of christians in Europe believe in Evolution. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣
There isn’t any evidence of a god, because they don’t exist. Feel free to list the best evidence you have
Leading off with "Invisible attributes.... have been clearly seen".
FFS
What, sir, are you a DOCTOR of?
Hello Ray (if I may call you Ray),
I am agnostic (used to be Christian for most of my life), and I must say that listening to you was quite soothing. You seem to genuinely care about other people in your prayers and talks, and I appreciate it a lot. I believe we need more civilized discourse motivated by care for others.
However, I also don't believe in a theistic God. I can't offer much in terms of academic prowess, but hopefully, I could hold up a decent conversation about some of the topics you mentioned as a physics student who’s been focusing on discovering theology over the last couple of years. Would you be willing to have a quick discussion with me about God, either on air or offline-whichever you prefer? I would definitely benefit from such an opportunity, and hopefully, you might too if you would indulge me.
What do you say? Would you be willing to have a civil discussion with a student passionate about learning about God and the world around us?
In any case, thank you, and have a blessed day.
Thank you for your reply. You are welcome to send an email to drrayself@gmail.com
Then he breaks out into a ridiculous prayer and praising his imaginary god lol
Are you convinced that 'Brahman' exists. Well, I think the same about YOUR god.
BTW: You know that Lying won't get you to your heaven, right? And you do that overwhelmingly here.
("You know that Lying won't get you to your heaven, right?")
It's like christians forget that there is even a ninth commandment.
.
What's absurd is believing there's an invisible super being in the sky , coming back from the dead, virgin births etc .
Over the past 50+ years, I have read six versions of the Bible in their entireties. Reading the Bible was highly instrumental in my becoming an atheist.
@14:45 "Look at the sky! Look at the clouds! There's incredible evidence for god! Amazing evidence for god !"
The sky and the clouds are evidence that the earth has an atmosphere.
What's amazing that a grown man is this simple minded. There's a reason the bible says that "you must come before god as if like a child" (or something to that extent). It outright admits that any intelligent person would have to check their brain at the door to buy any of this b.s.
If I had a nickel for every time I heard the word "overwhelming." Really kind of disappointing because I was wanting to hear some actual evidence other than just being told to go out and look around. If a single individual made the claim that 500 people saw something then that does not automatically give you 500 witnesses. You have to trust the one single individual didn't make something up. That's pretty hard to see that as "overwhelming."
I made a playlist for people who still think the Bible is true.
You are 100% correct you need faith to be an atheist because your faith in Christianity has made you an atheist to a 1000+ other Gods.
'An intelligent person will intelligently and objectively look at evidence.'
What should we conclude when it is obvious that you have *not* looked at the evidence for any of the scientific theories you mention?
Evidence that we can be dishonest in youtube video titles.
Says evolution is absurd, proceeds to list a ton of things that aren't evolution.
You silly man.
You really messed it up this time lmao. The irony of your claims has finally reached the threshold where your comment section flooded with atheists to mock and belittle you.
Constantly repeating the phrase "the evidence for god is overwhelming" without citing any actual evidence (bible verses do not constitute evidence) is not evidence
We all believe in volcanoes but we also know they are not gods no matter how evolved they have become.
being certain there is no god seems equivalent to being certain there is
Imagine being a ‘dr’ in any field and still being this ignorant and misinformed 🤦
A doctorate in 'Christian Psychology' from Jacksonville Theological Seminary 🤦♂
The Absurdity of RUclips
How does one believe in something one doesn't believe in?
That takes an act of God. Your's is actually a good question. I feel as though it may be asked in a mocking fashion, hard to tell from such a short question.
@@fuzzycounsellor9147 befast1973-g2f asks an excellent question. No one "believes" in atheism. Atheism is a belief as much as not collecting stamps is a hobby ... which is to say not at all.
@@rickmartin7596
Is that what
@befast1973-g2f
is saying?
A-theo; No God or negation of God
ist; one that adheres to or *advocates* a (specified) doctrine or system or code of behavior
So you saying it isn't a belief is dishonest or ignorant. You believe there is no God. It is not a neutral position.
I could care less how you dress this up, there are 2 choices yes or no, you are making a choice based on thinking though the evidence.
So tell me, do you believe in God/a god/gods/supreme being?
Either way, you believe it.
Quotes from the Bible are unproven CLAIMS, not evidence.
My goodness not 2 minutes in and the disingenuity has already started. But then the disingenuity is right there in the title.
The absurdity of atheism. Nope. It's the only rational position to take a there is no objective evidence for a divine being.
You have faith. That is neither objective nor rational.
To believe in something you have no empirical evidence to prove it exists and worship that non-existent being is irrational and absurd.
And yet you expect me to believe that an omni-omni being expects me to know and love it when all it has to show is a book of contradictions.
Such a being could and should do better than the convoluted narrative of the contrarian testaments of a humanly selected anthology.
Let me just see if I understand your specific brand of delulu...
1. God exists because the buybull says so.
2. The buybull is true because god inspired its authorship.
3 (actually 1 again). We know god inspired it because the buybull says so.
and round and round we go.
Sorry my guy but if the buybull is evendence for god's existence then god and his existence can't be used to support the buybull's validity.
“Buybull” 😂
Creationists have had their day in court and were torn to bits, just what are you even talking about. Right from the start you lie. Is there no commandment for such? Behe hasn't regained consciousness even still, I shouldn't wonder. Lying is very poor form old boy, very poor indeed. Shame on you!
When is this "evidence" for god that you speak of? A doctorate in what? Militant ignorance ? You are contemptible sir.
Aw, bless.
Lemme guess, doctor of theology? PhD in fairy tales?
Thank you for not saying "evidences".
So wrong in so many ways. It did make me laugh so that's nice. Let me ask you, can you see grass grow? Why not, it does grow right? Do you see your child get older each day, why not. Time scale, and arguing evolution is pointless now because evolution is a fact it is not just a theory even though the word theories used it is a fact like gravity is a fact germ theory is a fact. So anybody that disputes evolution is obviously an idiot they don't want to accept the truth. And ask yourself this if you need a God to create the universe who created God. And this guy talking is an atheist because he doesn't believe in all the other gods
Great! No evolution. Fine. Who created the creat_OR?????
5:00 There are several viable hypotheses for abiogenesis. There is ZERO evidence for creation. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
Here are some examples of transitional fossils you claim do not exist. get an education! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitional_fossil