Thanks for watching, and check out our other vids on police interrogation and policing: Police v. Military Interrogation: ruclips.net/video/y8ub_KDb6EU/видео.html Police Interrogation Techniques: ruclips.net/video/js4X-JdciHU/видео.html Interrogations: Why Police Always Win: ruclips.net/video/D0nFyMeyibA/видео.html Avoid the Police Like the Plague: ruclips.net/video/6YoSAyJxRXk/видео.html Blackstone's Formulation: ruclips.net/video/i9Ev_EE92Fg/видео.html Why Thank the Police: ruclips.net/video/Kk2EnvyV0-I/видео.html Why Silence Is Usable in Court: ruclips.net/video/LpnMVsTIWUI/видео.html
As it stands now, in the US, the use of false evidence ploys by the police during interrogation is legally permissible. As this study's findings suggest -- defense pointing out FEPs usage and their potential impact during trial to the jurors might be a weapon against FEPs. Just like you, many do question if FEPs should be allowed during police interrogations.
@@RanywayzRandom I'd like to say I don't wonder, but I know FEP aka LIE shouldn't ever be an acceptable method in interrogations, but I'm trying to leave room for a compromise if needed. For the most part, concerning the majority of cases it shouldn't be a tactic legally permissible or supported in courtrooms. In addition, it should also be a legal offense with appropriate consequences/punishment applied. But there might be need for a conditional acceptance with very specific identifiers such as: if suspect is a repeat offender of the accused code/crime and if the crime in question is similar to crime on record , etc. Maybe no need for that exception given analysis of existing outcomes or potential need under extreme extenuating circumstances
Thanks for watching, and check out our other vids on police interrogation and policing:
Police v. Military Interrogation: ruclips.net/video/y8ub_KDb6EU/видео.html
Police Interrogation Techniques: ruclips.net/video/js4X-JdciHU/видео.html
Interrogations: Why Police Always Win: ruclips.net/video/D0nFyMeyibA/видео.html
Avoid the Police Like the Plague: ruclips.net/video/6YoSAyJxRXk/видео.html
Blackstone's Formulation: ruclips.net/video/i9Ev_EE92Fg/видео.html
Why Thank the Police: ruclips.net/video/Kk2EnvyV0-I/видео.html
Why Silence Is Usable in Court: ruclips.net/video/LpnMVsTIWUI/видео.html
Thank you for your video. I love learning about research without having to parse though a research paper myself.
Wonderful! Thank you, Ian. 👍🏼
*Never attempt to win by force what can be won by deception. -- Niccolò Machiavelli.* _Seems like police interrogators really took this to heart._ 😈
Police should not be permitted to lie.
As it stands now, in the US, the use of false evidence ploys by the police during interrogation is legally permissible. As this study's findings suggest -- defense pointing out FEPs usage and their potential impact during trial to the jurors might be a weapon against FEPs. Just like you, many do question if FEPs should be allowed during police interrogations.
@@RanywayzRandom I'd like to say I don't wonder, but I know FEP aka LIE shouldn't ever be an acceptable method in interrogations, but I'm trying to leave room for a compromise if needed. For the most part, concerning the majority of cases it shouldn't be a tactic legally permissible or supported in courtrooms. In addition, it should also be a legal offense with appropriate consequences/punishment applied. But there might be need for a conditional acceptance with very specific identifiers such as: if suspect is a repeat offender of the accused code/crime and if the crime in question is similar to crime on record , etc. Maybe no need for that exception given analysis of existing outcomes or potential need under extreme extenuating circumstances
WE HELP STUDENTS WRITE TOP-NOTCH ESSAYS QUICKLY AND PROFESSIONALLY FROM AS LOW AS $11.
Algorithm.
what have you been watching on youtube?