Now let's look at plays! 1. Foul called. Is it a shooting foul? 2. Illegal Screening on a moving opponent. 3. Upgrade to Intentional Foul. Process and other factors. 4. Block/ Charge play. Anatomy of an incorrect call. 5. Verticality Play. Is defender legal? Plus a bonus fun play in our new ‘overtime’ section!
I was taught that if it's going to be intentional, call it immediately. But I like how the officials got together and got the call right, even though it wasn't immediately signaled.
Question for Play Number 1 - I agree its a shooting foul, however since the player releases the ball, would you give 1 FT if the shot was good? I think she travels (caused by the bump) and hence gets no basket and 2 FT.
1. Definitely a shooting foul. We wipe way too many of these plays into non-shooting fouls. 2. Angle is good by lead. However, this play would fit the parameters for an intentional foul (NFHS) or unsportsmanlike (NCAAW). We also need to call back the coach in white into the bench area. Bad look having him on the floor. 3. We are seeing more and more of these plays. I noticed that we had 2 eyes on the ball from lead and trail. Don't know the floor coverage for NFHS, but the foul occured in a dual coverage area for center and trail. Good pickup by center. 4. Play is really bang bang on this one. You could say block on this play and be OK according to our NCAAW supervisors. Good analysis on lead focus on officiating the correct players! 5. I think that the defender is drifting a bit. I may have a whistle on this play as our focus is to protect the shooter/airborne player. We can defend TRUE verticality plays, but this one takes shooter from a-b shifting to location c when the play finishes. Can whistle this play a push and the center official has the best look on this play.
@@BetterOfficials suprised you let the assistant stand and discuss with u. I've been told to tell them to sit down so u don't get bogged down dealing with them.
Now let's look at plays!
1. Foul called. Is it a shooting foul?
2. Illegal Screening on a moving opponent.
3. Upgrade to Intentional Foul. Process and other factors.
4. Block/ Charge play. Anatomy of an incorrect call.
5. Verticality Play. Is defender legal?
Plus a bonus fun play in our new ‘overtime’ section!
the overtime section, Isn't the Lead suppose to be the one call FT violation, is it?
Thanks!
Ed, I sent you an email request to join me on a podcast episode. Join me!
I was taught that if it's going to be intentional, call it immediately. But I like how the officials got together and got the call right, even though it wasn't immediately signaled.
Very helpful. Thank you o-o
Excellent videos! Great review of LGP.
Glad you liked it!
@@BetterOfficials That's great that you admit you made a mistake call. Awesome!
Outstanding! Stuff!
Thank you kindly!
very helpful...thank you :)
Nice sir. Tnx
What happens to #25 on play 2?
Play 1 is a tough one
Question for Play Number 1 - I agree its a shooting foul, however since the player releases the ball, would you give 1 FT if the shot was good? I think she travels (caused by the bump) and hence gets no basket and 2 FT.
Good catch. No goal if it goes in.
Was thinking the same thing, and glad you asked. Thanks Greg for confirming.
I'm surprised "flagrant" never entered into the discussion on #2.
1. Definitely a shooting foul. We wipe way too many of these plays into non-shooting fouls.
2. Angle is good by lead. However, this play would fit the parameters for an intentional foul (NFHS) or unsportsmanlike (NCAAW). We also need to call back the coach in white into the bench area. Bad look having him on the floor.
3. We are seeing more and more of these plays. I noticed that we had 2 eyes on the ball from lead and trail. Don't know the floor coverage for NFHS, but the foul occured in a dual coverage area for center and trail. Good pickup by center.
4. Play is really bang bang on this one. You could say block on this play and be OK according to our NCAAW supervisors. Good analysis on lead focus on officiating the correct players!
5. I think that the defender is drifting a bit. I may have a whistle on this play as our focus is to protect the shooter/airborne player. We can defend TRUE verticality plays, but this one takes shooter from a-b shifting to location c when the play finishes. Can whistle this play a push and the center official has the best look on this play.
Great points.
Play 3 could have spent lots of time on Trail positioning and issues. Lots more 3 person breakdowns to come.
Play 4 can be justified, but the bottom line is the play on video is NOT the play we thought we had in the game. That is really the point.
@@BetterOfficials hilarious how I watch ball on 3 and I'm like "that's close" but second time I try to watch lead's primary and looks like charge.
5:43 do you remember what you were explaining to the coach there?
Absolutely! Defenseless player. Excessive contact. Yes, excessive contact. Excessive contact, coach. Excessive contact.
I think you emphasized excessive contact lol 😂
@@BetterOfficials I would have given him a flagrant with ejection
@@BetterOfficials suprised you let the assistant stand and discuss with u. I've been told to tell them to sit down so u don't get bogged down dealing with them.
Overtime. Splat 😆
Is this NFHS rules?
Nvmd, heard at the 6:33 mark that it is NFHS.
I just want to know why this is not a flagrant
There is no "flagrant" foul in HS basketball. Its called intentional at this level.
@@Joekuh yes, there is Flagrant just not same sence.
There's Flagrant Technical and Flagrant Intentional