Allah est le dieu qui ne sait créer que des trous de cul bon à rien..et qui ne servent qu'à abrutir les gens 😂😂 Triste religion. C'est écri dans le coran que le dieu Allah est con alors c'est une vérité absolue. 😂😂😂 Réfléchissez un petit peu monsieur le sheik😂
@@Shikatanori-qf5gq yet its an incomplete theory. Things like inflation earlier on, dark matter, dark energy, latest discoveries of James Webb telescope, all mean that there are missing pieces.
@@owaisahmad7841 Sure there are missing pieces, but it explains more of the observed evidence than any other theory. That's why we believe it (until we find something better).
She is a sister from Yemen, but she's collecting money to buy a new iPhone 😛 These comments are made by bots, most likely run by dudes in India as most large scale online scam operations are run in India.
It was named “the big bang” bu astronomer Fred Hoyle, who, at the time was a leading proponent of the “steady state universe”. The name “big bang” was a deliberately pejorative, an attempt to ridicule the theory. After multiple predictions from big bang theory were observed to be true in the 1960s (cosmic background radiation, distant galaxies all moving away from us) the name big bang just kinda stuck.
_"I wonder why sometimes why did they call it the Big Bang, _*_maybe its to distract us..."_* Although I am sure its not, this comes off intellectually lazy at best & intellectually dishonest at worst. Speaking on such a grand subject but not being aware of or not doing the due dilegence to find out, how the name came to be? As knowing how the "Big Bang" was coined instantly tells one it couldn't possibly have been to "distract" anyone from anything because it was coined by Fred Hoyle speaking sarcastically & in a pejorative manner... Moreover, Hoyle coined it in this manner as he was vehemently critical of the theory & preferred the "steady state theory" which describes the Universe with no beginning nor end but always expanding and creating new stars & galaxies. When ppl of faith attach "alterior motives" & boogeymen to everything including the coining of terms, they end up being taken much less seriously by those not of faith, those most in need of Dawah.
learn how to spell "ulterior motives" before you give lectures about the least important part of the entire video. It is obvious he also meant it as a sarcastic response as well because a mere name doesn't distract the essence behind it.
So are you saying he was being dishonest about all the facts he presented. You seem to be stuck as to why they named it the Big Bang which is up to speculation and also the least important aspect of this conversation. If it was the way you say was then why don’t they change the name now since we have more information and evidence. This is of course to distract us from the truth. Like he said it wasn’t a big bang per se but like blowing up a balloon and expanding. So he is right in saying that!
I'm attempting to find rational and intelligent reasoning for a person who is Muslim and am yet to see video's on RUclips that represent this state of being so far
“ And you see the mountains, thinking them rigid, while they will pass as the passing of clouds. [It is] the work of Allah, who perfected all things. Indeed, He is Acquainted with that which you do. “ Quran 27 : 88
Two opposing forces. Fusion or fission.I would speculate that what holds the Universe together is fusion as the primary force and fission as a secondary force. The big bang probably never happened but in quantum there still exists fusional functions and both opposing forces complement either other but I doubt that a big bang happened entirely. Bangs would appear as expansion exploding and imposing retraction.
Hello Sheikh, I am an undergraduate physics major with physics research experience and there are some flaws in your statements which I would like to respectfully correct for you Sheikh. Keep in mind I receive these corrections from my professors as well so I am just passing the knowledge along. You keep saying the universe is a certain way according to the Big Bang theory which is incorrect. The Big Bang theory is an idea explaining the current state of the OBSERVABLE universe. So why are you making claims about the “universe” when we are limited in our observability of it as a whole? The observable universe definitely has a beginning but that does not mean describing the universe as a whole beyond what we can observe also behaves the same way. What if time as a dimension behaves completely differently from what you would expect beyond the observable universe? In terms of this question I urge you to do research on the No Boundary Proposal. It is a fascinating idea and very mind-bending indeed. In terms of the Olbers’ paradox, it was proposed in the year 1823 which is 82 years before the theory of Special Relativity was published. So he had no idea about Einstein’s discoveries which gives a solution showing how the speed of light “c” is constant causing light to take time to reach us from distant places and objects such as stars. This is why when you look out at the night sky you see mostly blackness because of the fact it is your distinct cosmological event horizon limiting when light can reach you. Also I find it funny you are trying to say Dr. Stephen Hawking and Dr. Neil DeGrasse Tyson who are PhD physicists working in the field for years compared to you or me are wrong about some things relating to the Big Bang theory because you also fail to realize your own errors. Both me and you compared to them have a ton of humbling learning to do. If you want to use science to support your religious beliefs which they do not or even try to disprove scientific theories at least understand the information and take correction. We as scientists take correction and humbly admit our ignorance all the time which is why we can properly learn and make new discoveries. Therefore I hope you can also humble yourself to admit your own ignorance and take some time to read this comment while properly further researching like I am as well. Thank you so much! ,Very Respectfully Keith A. I. Huckleby
Well in your arguments you mentioned some errors of the speaker remember he's not a trained scientist nor he's teaching science. He's a theologian showing the importance of beliefs when we do science. Even though scientists can make errors. In refutation of your arguments I would like to say you said bigBANG is an idea explaining the observable universe which is incorrect. bigBANG is the idea of how the universe began or came into being. But it is not a fact it's just a theorem to prove they discovered CMB thus claiming for proof of bigBANG which is not reality when you can't even see beyond CMB. For example before the advent of the bigBANG theorem people believed in another theorem called the "onion theory" ask your professor about it. So science can change at any time but not factual truth. Recent discoveries made by JWST are shocking for the scientific community It challenges the understanding of bigBANG. Here is a link watch it. ruclips.net/video/SgSITin3obc/видео.htmlsi=ZmjRcTTomN7JqZzo People want to see God in their own eyes in order to believe in God now the same question applies can you show us bigBANG happening? You will say oh no it happened billions of years ago back then we didn't have cameras to record it how can I show you such an event but we have captured heat signatures called CMB it proves bigBANG which is an assumption. For us the universe has a beginning and will end in the future it is not necessary how it began because it has nothing to do with theology unlike the atheistic secular world view denying the existence of God. The universe created in bigBANG or any other means that is irrelevant
@@TheMrZek Yes we as scientists make mistakes which is why we admit our errors and correct ourselves unlike religious people who simply want to believe as they wish in face of evidence against them. Because we as scientists actually correct our mistakes we are actually rethinking about the Big Bang theory in terms of what can be concluded about the universe beyond what is observable. Actually what I said was the Big Bang theory is an idea explaining the current state of the observable universe and no it an explanation of how the universe began because you obviously did not read what I said. How can you make any claim about the universe as a whole if you are limited in your observability of it? Not only that but when you look at the derivations our understanding of time breaks down the further you push towards the singularity. Can you define what a theory is since you claim it is not a fact? And yes you are correct about what you say when it comes to the CMB which goes back to what I said about how light takes time to reach us over longer distances. But you are incorrect when you say we as scientists claim the Big Bang happened billions of years ago instead what we actually say is the Big Bang theory is an explanation of how the observable universe started it’s expansion which is still happening now. The Big Bang did not happen already, it is still happening because the expansion of the universe never stopped. As a matter of fact the expansion is accelerating. I am watching the video you sent me which I will get back to you with some notes.
@@keith.anthony.infinity.h I too was a physics major and can understand a little bit of science. What is the standard model for bigBANG? I am not claiming anything just elaborating rationality.
@@TheMrZek Yes we as scientists make errors which is why I called out the theologian’s errors as I had the same conclusions he did and my professors corrected me. It seems like you are not listening either because if you read what I said in my previous comment I stated that the Big Bang theory is not an idea about how the universe began but rather about how the observable universe came to be in it’s current state specifically in terms of expansion. Saying the Big Bang is the beginning of the universe is incorrect because how can you make such a claim about the universe beginning when you are limited in your observability of it? You literally said it yourself we are limited in what we can observe beyond the CMB which is light so how can you make such bold claims about the universe? Your interpretation of the Big Bang theory explaining the beginning of the universe are out of date. Not only that but our understanding of how time as a dimension behaves at that scale is being questioned.
@@TheMrZek What do you mean by standard model exactly in terms of particles or the model of the Big Bang theory itself? Also I am watching the video you sent which I am taking notes on right now.
"Once It was smoke and We caused it to ATHUNDER...we (Royal we) are IT'S EXPANDERS...we can make matter meet willingly or Unwillingly...And On THAT day we will scroll up the Heavens like a scroll untill it is NO MORE than a FIST FULL of MATTER...He who Originates the process of creation begins again!" This is in The Quran check it out!
It must have been made to exist is just a construct of the human way of thinking; why not extend it: God must have existed to cause the universe to begin so then what caused God to exist? Don't get out of it by saying He was always there because then you have to explain what "always" and "there" would mean in that context.
God by definition is uncaused, the necessary existence. You're pretty much asking who or what created the First Cause which makes no sense, like who baked the baker. The universe is contingent, it can't keep being dependent on something else forever. Every scientist worth his salt pretty much believes in a necessary existence, the atheist's among them just don't like to call it God and give it attributes that make God, God.
@@WeAreGhuraba please don't assume what I can and cannot grasp. I don't have an argument/don't have time to carry on trying to counter obvious comebacks?
Well new gen scientist are now questioning bigBANG theorem they say bigBANG might be a wrong theorem. Listen what Hawking quotes "acording to" "acording to" what is this "according to" is!! He's not sure!! In science there is tendency to let assume a thing in first place. And there is a joke you must not assume bcz when you assume you made an Ass out of U & Me 😅
People are now questioning the project hawking too bcz back in the days how did a machine speak on behalf of human till today NASA has no evidence for that where is that wheelchair that spoke on behalf of hawking have you ever check/test that is even real or scam. I've seen it on the internet people are skeptical about hawking & his work. It's all about propaganda.
You should be providing this course for free! If you make it payable, how can you ensure it reaches majority people? Is this how will you spread islam amongst people?
We have a free 4-part video series called the Quranic Case for God, you can find that here: quraniccaseforgod.com/ As far as the Why Islam is True Course, this is what we do. We have trained over 500 teachers in 19 countries to teach it to their community on the ground. This includes Imams, Scholars, Prison Chaplains, Convert Care Centers, Youth Leaders and more. We are also currently visiting 40 universities across America and giving away 4000 copies to university students this year, including free training and mentoring and workshops. You can find out more information on that here. whyislamistruefoundation.org/spreading-conviction-on-campus/ We are also created a convert development program which includes the Why islam Is True Course Free as well as other course plus mentoring sessions to help converts in their new journey and help them overcome convert related challenges, like family rejection, community integration etc. You can find out more information about that here: whyislamistruefoundation.org/converts-connect/ In addition to that, non-muslims looking into Islam get the course free. In addition to that whenever someone purchases the course, 2 give 2 more courses away free. In addition to that no one is turned down for lack of funds, we have a financial aid button on the checkout page and we mention this on the course page. If someone can not afford the payments, we have full scholarships. So why are we charging, because the value and quality of the course is much more than what we charge, and we need those who can pay to pay so that we can continue our work worldwide and put this in every Muslims hand. We are also currently translating the course to different languages. All this costs money and resources, but still those can't afford to pay are not turned down just click on the financial aid button. We have never turned anyone down and we never will insha'Allah. I hope that explains things a bit better. May Allah reward you, and please apply for financial aid. This course is too important not to take. Jazakum Allah Khayr.
So scientists who spent their whole life thinking about this question know only a little about it. Meanwhilw, you who read nothing other than Qur'an and Hadiths have this miraculous knowledge of it. Do you not feel embarassed to make such claims? Take a book of science and read it. You will actually learn something. By the way, "if something exists then someone must have created it" argument is the most logic deprived, most low effort argument. How about, prove where the creator is first, then make claims?
@@chadimkila4868 i can ask the same question. Who created the one who created this world? Are you telling me that the one who created these vast spans with billions of galaxies each with a trillion stars, chose to show up on one small planet revolving around a small star in an average galaxy, to reveal the truth that you're not supposed to eat pork? Are you really that child minded to believe this , when the evidence to look for is out there?
@@chadimkila4868 I could ask you back the same question: who created the one that created this universe? I have a simple assertion: how about we just say, "I don't know". Personally , I would say, that this universe is so unimaginably vast and beyond understanding, that it is safe to say that we may never know whether or not there was a creator, let alone what language he chose to reveal the truth in or which animal he decided is clean to eat and which one is not . With all the recent advancements in science and technology, to look out into the depths of this universe, seeing how unimaginably beyond our grasp it is, and then to sing that the one who created this vast universe is a simple-minded, childlike God who decides which people to punish and which people to save, is not just stupid, it is downright insulting to our place in this world as a thinking animal.
@@sca8217 You can't ask the question "Who created God? " because God has unique attributes. Allah says in the Quran: "Say: he is Allah the one Allah is eternal and absolute None is born of him and nor was He born And there is none like him" He is the creator, we can't compare him to the creation like the universe. Everything has a beginning and an end exept Allah. There is no problem in saying "I don't know" but this does not mean that we don't have to think. Even if the big bang Is real, something caused It. And this "something" had something that caused It too. We can go on forever. The Idea of an all powerful and eternal being that created everything is not illogical at all. That's being said, there are other proof of Allah existence. Here some examples: The Quran Is a literary masterpiece, no one in 1400 years brought up a better book. The Quran does not have a single contradiction or mistake, if you don't believe It bring me an something. Prophet Muhammad (SAW) said some prophecies and all of them came true or are becoming true. For example, he said that one day there will be sexual trasmitted diseases and It became true. In the Quran there are miracles: Watch the video called " 27 undeniable miracles of the Quran". An example is that Allah says the embryo looks like leech and the scientists confirmed it. The miracle Is that the embryo Is not visible to the human Eye When It looks like a leech so no one knew It 1400 years ago. Why do you think that God has a childish mindset? If we can't undestand his plans this doesn't mean the He is wrong at all. It's the opposite, It proves that our brain Is limited. PS: English Is not my first language, you could find some grammatical mistakes.
@@chadimkila4868 well, if that's the case, then any religious claim is to be believed . The Bible is reportedly the word of God and the truth according to Christians. Similar assertion to Muslims. Who's right then? And a lot of the 'science' stated in the Quran is common knowledge. Are you seriously implying that people did not know sexually transmitted diseases before the Prophet Mohammed. Quran also said that the moon was split in two and the prophet rode on a winged horse. Why should anyone read that and say ',there are no contradictions' ? I can take a book of science and work my way towards building a vehicle or an aeroplane. Can you do the same with your religious books? Embryo does not look like a leech. Go into a biology lab and see what an embryo looks like. This is why I said, read books outside of your religious books. You will learn to appreciate the world better, creator or not.
I laugh at the pea minds who believe all this bullshit. Why doesn't he go to some international platform and prove his theory. And fetch some Nobel prize by proving what Steve Hawkins said wrong.
What is that infinite singularity? Where was it? What was supporting it to be where it was? Who created it? Human beings cannot just agree that Allah Swt Created the multiverse. ?
Qur'an is not a book of mathematics moreover numbers are concepts developed by humans. Even without a number you can write it alphabetically. Ie: one,two,three etc.
@@TheMrZek wow what a logic man, i am glad by your statement keep going you will become a prophet. if its not written then why the hell they make these claims??
BB? When you squeeze universal content together they are packed into smaller volume, become denser? What does happen? Do you left behind.... empty space or there wasn't any universal space outside dense matter before the BB? So what was outside then the dense universe, and in what and to where universal energy/matter has been expanding all these long? The space outside the dense universal matter was never in BB balance sheet from the beginning! I don't subcribe to BB theory!😮
this is so stupid. because it assume the big bang theory itself is correct. which is currently in doubt. so if the big bang never happen. then you all talking about god causing the big bang that never happen is quite stupid. it literally the blind making a map and people arguing if that is a tree or a rock on tha map, when the entire map is wrong.
Firstly, who says the big bang theory is in doubt? And if it were by the way, there is still evidence for the existence of God without the big bang, and that is the Quranic Argument from Contingency, the topic of your free video series called the Quranic Case for God, found here: www.quraniccaseforgod.com/
If words refer to observable objects we can use those words to communicate with if we agree on the given definition. E.g., cat refers to a furry four legged mammal. No argument there. If you ask what the word "god" refers to, each religion has it's own definition. Why?
This is a great question, we actually go over the definition of God in Islam and it's rational proof thoroughly in our Why Islam is True Course, and we then further look at the 3 worldviews which differ based on their concept or definition of God. This creates a specific worldview. We show how the only worldview that is rational is the Islamic Worldview based on the Quranic definition of God using rational arguments presented with logical syllogism.
@@BasiraEducationwhere do you discuss Judaism? I did the course and didn’t see this mentioned as Judaism has a similar concept of God, does it not? Thank you
It doesn't work like that. In semitic culture, each word represents a caracteristic of the object or a beeing, written in its morphology. Example, Cat is not the animal but what it does, but you have to know first its origin, etymology : Cat came from semitic egyptian word Qit, this dwells the meaning of Cat. It came from old egyptian empire, where cats entered in the culture of humanity, and like various symbolic object written through hyeroglyph, the Cat came as representative tool or object among others in Pharoas court. See the meaning : "to be disposed, arranged". Don't think the words were created randomly. The word God has its own meaning, and Allah too. For Allah, it's about Dedication, through the archetyp L. For the word God, its origin is doubtful, probably a PIE "ghut" from a Yamna tribe in north caucasus between 5 or 6 thousand years ago. Your thoughts are always changing, but the word engraved a reality coming from thousand years ago, caracteristic. So, for you a cat is a "furry four legged mammal", for me it's a "beeing put closed to human". Not the same reality. I'm closer to the meaning of "Cat" than you. :)
@@AllenAnderson-b6tit's hilarious how you comment against Islam while knowing nothing about it or the Qur'an. The Qur'an is full of rational pleas asking the reader to think, reflect, and use their intellect and to observe the natural world around them to find evidence for God and His creation. The Qur'an also asks the reader to not simply accept what has been handed down to them by their family and their society, but instead, to seek the truth themselves. But you don't know about that and/or you don't care because your heart is full of hatred against Islam and Muslims. You arrogantly believe you know the truth without doing sincere research... Sincere research takes time and effort. Hateful trolling is so easy it can be done by children and teenagers 🤷🏻♂️
1. False Dichotomy (Either-Or Fallacy): The video sets up a dichotomy between belief in God and belief in an infinite, eternal universe, implying that the only two options are a universe created by God or a meaningless, eternal universe. This ignores other possibilities, such as alternative scientific explanations or other interpretations of cosmology. Example: "If the universe began to exist, then it must have been made to exist by something that is not a physical object composed of mass energy existing in spacetime... God in other words." This fallacy presents only two choices and ignores other potential explanations like multiverse theories or other unknown scientific models. 2. Argument from Ignorance (Appeal to Ignorance): The video assumes that because scientists don’t know what caused the Big Bang, it must be God. It’s the “we don’t know, therefore God” reasoning, which is a classic argument from ignorance-asserting that a lack of evidence for one explanation proves another. Example: "If scientists accept the Big Bang as fact, why do they hold on to the assumption that the Universe should be explained without God? How does that make sense? It doesn't make any sense." Just because science doesn’t currently have all the answers doesn’t mean the answer must be divine intervention. This is jumping to a conclusion without sufficient evidence. 3. Straw Man Fallacy: The video misrepresents the scientific community's position by suggesting that scientists "want to do science without God" or are biased against the idea of God. In reality, many scientists are simply looking for natural explanations, which is the core of scientific methodology. The claim that they are deliberately excluding God is a distortion. Example: "They believed in an infinite time going back and Infinite Space because they wanted to do science without God." This oversimplifies and distorts the motivations of scientists, setting up a weaker version of their position to knock it down. 4. Appeal to Consequences: The argument in the video seems to imply that because it’s undesirable or irrational to believe the universe has always existed, it must therefore be false, and a creator must exist. This is an appeal to consequences-arguing that something must be true or false based on the desirability of its implications. Example: "If the universe is infinite in size and it has an infinite number of stars... it shouldn't be dark... But we know the universe is dark at night, so the universe can't be infinite." This assumes that an undesirable consequence (an infinitely old or large universe causing paradoxes) must mean the conclusion (a created universe by God) is true, which doesn't logically follow. 5. Begging the Question: The video often assumes the conclusion it’s trying to prove: that God exists. It makes claims that rely on the assumption that the universe must have been created by God, without actually proving this. This circular reasoning assumes the answer within the question. Example: "If the Big Bang happened then something made it happen, and that thing... is God." This statement assumes what it's trying to prove-that the universe must have a divine creator. 6. Appeal to Authority: There’s an implicit appeal to the authority of figures like Edwin Hubble or scientific discoveries, not as neutral facts but as evidence that somehow supports a theological argument. While the science presented is accurate, it’s used to lend undue credibility to a religious conclusion. Example: "There have been many other scientific confirmations. Everybody believes in the Big Bang now..." This tries to draw authority from scientific consensus on the Big Bang to suggest it supports belief in God, which isn’t a conclusion science draws. 7. Non Sequitur: Some arguments in the video don’t logically follow from the premises. Just because the universe began to exist doesn’t mean it must have been created by a supernatural being. There’s a leap from cosmological facts to theological claims without a logical connection. Example: "If the universe began to exist, it must have been made by something that is not part of the universe... Therefore, God." This is a non sequitur because the conclusion (God exists) doesn’t logically follow from the premise (the universe began to exist). 8. Cherry-Picking: The video only presents evidence that seems to support the existence of God, while ignoring other interpretations or explanations of the Big Bang. It focuses on gaps in scientific understanding to push a specific agenda. Example: "Since then there have been many other scientific confirmations... the universe began to exist." This uses the Big Bang as proof of a creator, while ignoring scientific discussions about quantum mechanics, multiverse theory, or other natural explanations that don’t involve divine intervention.
All of what you said here can be simply answered by the irrefutable Quranic Argument from Contingency. This is presented with the logical syllogism in a video found in our playlist " Thinking Muslim Guide to Atheist Arguments" I suggest you watch the videos in that playlist, and things will become more clear. If you have any questions about that argument, would love to discuss. Take care.
These Scientist believe that Iron is the core of earth, without the God. Till today they can not proof it, While God clearly mentioned that Iron came from skies on earth, not part of earth. Stupid scientist fooling people , and with their useless PhDs to earn money.,
What does the Quran say about the earth just read it please . Allah made the earth first when the heavens were still smoke ! Allah stretched out the earth like a bed . Bed is flat
Thumma doesnt mean first it isnt always a chornological meaning and the earth shaped like a bed doesnt mean its flat it would reffer to the fact that the arth id like our home wherw all people live unlike other harsh planets
If God created the Universe (Complex thing), then who created God (even more complex thing)? Which God created the universe? There are thousands of them. Could a dead God (Zeus, Ra, Apollo, Mars, Jupiter) have created the universe? How did this Muslim apologist rule out all these questions and arrive at Allah, for everything?
I have the answer and its easy, First of all God is only ONE God , no picture, no statue, no image. Written in all religious books. And the second part who created God is just a wrong question. I told you how. God is uncreated. Beyond time and space. If we say some thing is created we talk about past relative to time and space. God is one who created this time and the whole universe. Lets say if some created God then who created God is our God and then who created that God? So we continue until we reach to a God who is uncreated. God is a creator of everything. If some thing is being created is not a God.
These are great questions. But they come from the assumption that Muslims believe in a contingent God like other religions do. Islam is the only religion that doesn't believe in a contingent God. So we first have to logically determine does God exist and is he contingent? This is addressed in our Thinking Muslim Guide to Atheist's Argument. I wiss send the link below. you will also notice in that series is we are not using the Christian argument of Intelligent Design or Fine Tuning to prove God's existence, these arguments are weak and lead to the very valid counter argument you make in your opening, "Who Designed the Designer". We also address that in the playlist, but take it from video 1 first otherwise you will misunderstand what we mean by "God", that he is the necessary being that is not contingent. And there is rational proof for that which is presented. Here is the playlist Thinking Muslim Guide Playlist, ruclips.net/video/MYcCNqP7OAk/видео.html&list=PLeVtFJ5Wg2huMmciz8RiXxIvLT0To8vPu&index=1&t=40s
@@harisaslam573You still have a lot to answer:- 1.How did u know there is only one God(don't touch Quran because u will introduce another chain where u will have to prove authenticity of it) 2. How did u know that that God created the universe himself not through other creature of himself. 3.How did u know that it was Allah and not any other among 1000s worshiped. 4.Where is he? Inside of the universe or outside? 5.Why can't he talk himself to all people individually? Is he too shy? Or he can't? Or he just want many people go to hell?
@@bestmindcoolingrelaxationm1084 if you want to know i will tell you and answers all of the questions. This comment section is not enough place to explain all, you can share your email or number.
Flawed arguments based on misunderstandings about science. Again , the pinacle of blind faith bias . You should have looked for the origin of the name bigbang before making any allegations against scientists. The term “Big Bang” was coined as a somewhat mocking description by British astronomer Fred Hoyle during a 1949 radio broadcast. Hoyle, who favored a different theory (the steady-state model), used the term to describe the idea that the universe began from a singular, extremely hot and dense point before expanding. Despite the intention behind it, the name stuck. Besides that, there are several misunderstandings in your arguments. 1. Misrepresentation of Science: You claim that scientists resisted the Big Bang theory because they didn’t want to believe in God. The broader scientific community accepts evidence-based theories. The Big Bang was resisted initially, not because it implied a beginning (and thus possibly a creator), but because it was a radical shift from the steady-state model, which had been favored for other scientific reasons at the time. 2. Olber’s Paradox Misinterpretation: The video mentions Olber’s Paradox to argue against an infinite universe. While it’s true that Olber’s Paradox points out that an infinite, unchanging universe would result in a bright sky at night, this has been addressed by the expanding universe model of the Big Bang, without needing to invoke the idea of God. 3. Misleading about the Big Bang and Time: You state that “if the Big Bang happened, something must have made it happen,” which implies a misunderstanding of causality. In modern cosmology, time itself begins at the Big Bang. Asking “what came before” is somewhat meaningless because “before” implies time, and time did not exist prior to this event. Many physicists, including Hawking, argue that there was no “before” in the way we commonly understand it. 4. Attributing the Cause to God: The jump from “something caused the universe” to “that something must be God” is a philosophical leap, not a scientific one. Even if we accept the universe had a cause, there is no evidence to suggest that this cause is conscious or has any of the attributes traditionally ascribed to God (like omniscience or omnipotence). Your God exists only if you want it and stretch the reality for it to happen.
Why God has to create existance through very2 slow processes taking billions of years to create what we are today? God can just create it on spot instantly. Big bang may not be real or it may not be the beginning, it may be like a circle, without beginning. And the slow processes of creation could be running by nature. Unless if you think nature itself is a God. Nature has no beginning and infinite. How do you reply to this argument?
That billion of years time is for Us not for God. God is outside from time limitations. And he created this universe by laws and physical phenomina of nature.
@harisaslam573 Doesn't matter, we describe God based on reality, so we judge God also based on reality. God judge us also based on reality. Otherwise God is undecribable entity.
@@nazhasan428 you can still recognize God very easily by seeing his creation all around us including you and me. His signs are every where from a Galaxy to an atom. Signs for those who reflect.
@harisaslam573 As I said, you still have to look at reality to learn about God and so you can use reality to argue about God. One of them, the process of creation, as I mentioned, the suffering, disasters, inefficiencies (e.g birth defects, diseases, animal cruelty, so many planets are inhabitable, etc).
God is not male or female. Allah is not a being. Allah consist of light/ nur that we as humanity cannot comprehend it's beauty of. Just look at nature around you and you can comprehend but an infistisimal iota of the beauty and mercy of Allah
@@crazyforcanada it is the royal HE. . And in this case we do not denote any sex to that HE cause Muslim implicitly and explicitly understand and accept that Allah is not it, he ,she. Allah is nur*light ..which encompasses compassion, beauty,justice, guidance. And as humans we cannot fathom the enormity of who Allah is but suffice to say we accept Allah as our creator and all the tenets that goes with islam.
"Religion was invented when the first con man met the first fool." - Mark Twain The Hajj has been a Pagan ritual. They were circling Kaaba 7 times to worship their 7 Gods. Muslims are doing the same Hajj. Therefore, Muslims also worship 7 Pagan Gods when they do the Hajj.
The Hajj was adopted and adulterated by pagans long after the Prophet Ibrahim (as) and his son Prophet Ismaeel (as) built it together. Muslims reclaimed the Kaaba as their rightful inheritance from Ibrahim (as).
when We designated for Abraham the site of the House, [saying], "Do not associate anything with Me and purify My House for those who perform Tawaf and those who stand [in prayer] and those who bow and prostrate.(26) And proclaim to the people the Hajj [pilgrimage]; they will come to you on foot and on every lean camel; they will come from every distant pass -(27) -Surah 22:26-27 (Indeed, the first House [of worship] established for mankind was that at Bakka - blessed and a guidance for the worlds.) Surah 3:96 Psalm 84:5-6 New International Version 5 Blessed are those whose strength is in you, whose hearts are set on pilgrimage. 6 As they pass through the Valley of Baka, they make it a place of springs; the autumn rains also cover it with pools.
Why then that even in written in the Thorah/Old testament !??? Than when this Prophet ( s.a.w.s.) arrived in Arabia, even pilgrimage animal sacrifice are allowed and pleased God !??? 🤭😂😂😂 My prophet (s.a.w.s) is in the Thorah prophecy’s !!! God commanded : Everyone must follow his command and teachings !!!! When not, good luck in afterlife !!!
Where other cultural stories of creation had/have both a male and female deity to make the creation going in cycles, the Abrahamic story of creation has lost this natural mytho-logical part of the telling, having just an invisible male god in which we all simply and unnaturally have to believe in. The very idea of a Big Bang or of any beginning of the Universe is de facto contradicted in the numerous cultural Stories of Creation themselves. Our ancestors all over the world had/have an ETERNAL CYCLICAL PERCEPTION of both the micro- and macrocosm, constituted by a principal TRIAD process of an eternal Creation, Dissolution, and Re-Creation in the Universe. No beginning and no end at all. When our ancestors spoke of a beginning, it was specifically about the pre-conditions of and the factual creation telling of the Milky Way galaxy and the Solar System. Otherwhere else in the cosmos they had “Islands sailing in the Cosmic Ocean” for other galaxies. When historic and present scholars have no clues of this several thousands of year-old specific Milky Way Mythology telling, they have no other possibilities but to take it literally for an initial creation of the entire Universe. - Which de facto is very unscientific in all accounts. And the very same goes for educated scientists who in fact could have got the natural explanations by interpreting the ancient Creation Stories correctly. Search for mor informations here: native-science (dot) net Best Wishes Ivar Nielsen Comparative Mythologist & Natural Philosopher Denmark
One can always trust an apologist to butcher scientific data and theories in his attempt to prove his religion. This guy is no exception. The way he revealed how he has NO clue of the origin for the cosmic microwave background radiation was painful to watch... 🙄 He is repeating what he has read on popular scientific level without understanding the actual science. And with this middle school-level understanding of science, he's claiming to being able to debunk actual experts in the field.
This mullah is knowledgeable about the physics, so credit where credit is due. However, he is missing the very obvious question: if Allah is responsible for the Big Bang, why is it never mentioned in the Quran? The Quran spends pages and pages detailing the punishments for non-believers, but cannot spend a few words explaining the fundamentals of the universe.
This is coming. Shaykh Hamza is also knowledgeable about the Quran and teaches Tafseer at a very high level, so he will go into this in further videos insha'Allah, the series is just starting. We appreciate your support and look forward to your future feedback.
@@BasiraEducation is the scientific evidence for the universe قطعيّ according to the sheikh? This might be debatable, and does big bang mean ex-nihilo? Jazakallah
Waiting his demonstration that the Big-bang doesn't appear in the Torah : bereshit Bara' Elohim The Skies and the Earth. It needs hight skill in semantic to understand this verse. It is said that The Skies were separated from the Earth برء . The Big-bang appears in the very beginning of the Torah, Genesis 1.1. Also, Sma' (sky= means something, and Earth too : it's not about "things" nor object, but a process. Allah ta'ala says in the Qur'an the state of Skies and Earth before the beginning, رتق. Philosopher philosophing could deny Big-Bang concept came from Genesis 1.1, in vain. Better to focus on linguistic and semantic when it's about God's words.
Yo do not even have any Torah, man made fallacy and filth, not a sinlge alphabet is from Almighty God. One God, One langauage for all mankind that is the Arabic, One Book for all mankind to which idiots today call as the Quran..
The Big Bang … “Do the disbelievers not realize that the heavens and earth were ˹once˺ one mass then We split them apart? And We created from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?” Surah 21:30
Yes, but the word رتق that Allah ﷻ used in the ayah doesn't denote a ball like what modern science allege what the big bang was at its singularity point. It can mean joined mass, but it can also mean something that is plugged. In this specific ayah, the Quranic description is intentionally a generic description to be comprehendible and fluid for its local time and audience. The meaning "plugged" works perfectly for the desert arab 1400 years ago, as for them, this literally meant: "haven't the disbelievers seen how both the sky and the earth were both plugged, the sky had no clouds in it to rain, and the earth is a barren land with no life in it, then Allah has opened both: the sky causing it to pour rain down which caused the plantations to open the earth and grow?" and then He said "and We made from [that] water [which We brought down] everything [from those plants, animals and humans] thrive - so will they not [then] believe?". But the miraculous comprehension of the Quran also has the capacity to point to (what modern science call today of the theory of the beginning of the universe) the big bang, as well as the the fact that all living organisms contain water in the cellular level, which makes the translation that you used also valid for our time of scientific discoveries and advancements. Subhan Allah.
@@Overfloater777 with all due respect, I disagree with your assessment, i understand the Arabic language sometimes can be a challenge to non Arabic speaking and even to Arabic speaking people …, كانتا رتقا، means there were joined to gather, ففتقناهما ، we split them, don’t read into the context more than what it says. The Quran was not written for the people 1400 years ago only, 1400 years ago they could not fathom the meaning of this Ayah, this Ayah for our generation to show the disbelievers that the Quran could not have been written by a human 1400 years ago
@@Shikatanori-qf5gq you want people to keep wandering for 1400 years what does the Big Bang means? It doesn’t work that way, they are many things that are still vague in the Quran for future generations and discoveries, in addition don’t try to confirm the Quran to their discoveries, for an example they keep saying space dust in the universe while God says smoke… what comes out an explosion? Smoke not dust …who is more truthful than Allah?
Before any conclusions are claimed for any god - you MUST show that it exists. Without this - everything that follows is just a pointless stream of baseless conjecture .
You are correct, this is what we have done in our videos you can find in our Thinking Muslim Guide to Atheist's Argument. This series on God's Cosmos deals with the Big Bang and science. You can find the proof that God exists in this playlist. Notice, we don't use intelligent design or fine tuning, these are weak arguments and lead to he valid counter argument made by atheists known as "Who Designed the Designer". You can find the Thinking Muslim Guide Playlist, here. ruclips.net/video/MYcCNqP7OAk/видео.html&list=PLeVtFJ5Wg2huMmciz8RiXxIvLT0To8vPu&index=1&t=40s Would love to hear your feedback on those videos, we have others which will be coming the series is still growing.
Frist ask where did egg come from? Hen. Now ask where did hen come from? God. Now ask where did god. Come from?... Now if anyone answers he came from nothing... Congratulations you just become atheist 💐🎊💯
@@BasiraEducation The garbage is that you fail to understand the difference between Universe and observable universe. When scientist say the universe originate from the big bag, they don't mean the whole universe, they mean observable universe, when they say the universe is expanding they mean observable universe etc so we've not yet observe the whole universe till this time, and that's where you're trapped.. Those religious arguments that tries to prove science wrong are the one that kicked me out of Islam and for that I say Allah huaakbaaaaar..🎉
My friends, there is only One Hero in this story. Jesus Christ! Before God spoke a Word, time as we know it was not made. How does the Big Bang Theory disprove God when it only adds to the obvious power of His Word to those who refuse to simply repent and know His Undeniable Power? What is the definition of power to people? In every rational way, the atheist is a fool. God is not a theological idea. God is a Living Spirit Who desires a relationship with you. Can you not see the testimonies? Here am I to confess my dependence on Jesus Christ for everything! God gave me Dignity. I could not do it myself, God will do the same thing for any who call upon His name and have a true heart
It's called an interview Einstein.. wth does it matter if He's talking to someone or not You are still hearing him. And he is not a "kid", he's a grown man.. wth is wrong with you 🤦🏽♂️
So Sad to hear, where the speaker says, muslims follow their DEEN, there no such thing in Quraan that msulims follow their own dean, Just like not a single verse contasin name of Muahmmad and word Quran or Book given to him. Mushriqeen have their Deen, for muslims DEEN has no personal meaning, it is the charactersitic of Almighty God, the way HE wants to run or judge the people.,
Do you have any specific criticism of what is said in the video, something you can point out which is incorrect? If so we would be gladly to discuss. Open minded discussion is how we all move forward.
@@BasiraEducation You're not open minded because no matter what you're required to always defend Quran, so you're either lying to us or you don't know the meaning of open minded.. Being open minded is to not attempt to prove something after you believed that it's true. Let me ask this question to test your open mindedness,. Can Islam be false and Quran not from God ? Could it be possible that true God is YAHWE and not ALLAH?
@@hehepet Your sheikh assumes that the big bag was the begining of the universe while we don't have access to the WHOLE UNIVERSE, Big bag is the begining of the OBSERVABLE UNIVERSE. He just say things to defend Islam and that is to me stupidity you have to see things as they are and not to try to pull them to your side .
He was more intelligent than you could even ever hope to be. Let's hope that you succumb to the same condition that he had, shall we ? At least we know that he existed.
Quite right, no one should speak to or listen to a physically disabled person, even if that person has a PhD in cosmology. Obviously, we should also mock and ignore any imam who uses a wheelchair.
I laugh everytime I see these so called "geniuses" claiming the universe came out of nothing. They believe in "the big bang" but refuse to believe in the thing that caused it. No many braincells, so little thought.
@@Shikatanori-qf5gq because they're not providing any convincing arguments, and they don't have any interest in doing so. It's just xtian white noise, and it's insulting to anyone who cares about intellectual honesty.
Try looking these up before commenting out of your arrogant western ignorance 1. Al-Khwarizmi - algorithm and algebra 2. Jabir Ibn Hayyan - chemistry and alchemy 3. Ibn Sina - medicine and philosophy 4. Al-Farabi - music and philosophy 5. Al-Kindi - optics and medicine 6. Ibn al-Haytham - optics and physics 7. Nasir al-Din al-Tusi - astronomy and mathematics 8. Omar Khayyam - mathematics and poetry 9. Ibn Rushd (Averroes) - medicine and philosophy 10. Ibn Battuta - geography and travel writing 11. Al-Ghazali - philosophy and theology 12. Ibn Nafis - anatomy and medicine 13. Ibn Zuhr - surgery and medicine 14. Al-Maʾarri - poetry and philosophy 15. Al-Jazari - mechanical engineering and robotics 16. Al-Masudi - geography and history 17. Al-Biruni - astronomy and mathematics 18. Al-Idrisi - geography and cartography 19. Ibn Tufail - philosophy and literature 20. Al-Tusi - trigonometry and algebra 21. Ibn Khaldun - sociology and historiography 22. Al-Battani - astronomy and mathematics 23. Al-Razi - medicine and alchemy 24. Ibn al-Nafis - circulatory system and pulmonary circulation 25. Al-Khazini - physics and mechanics 26. Ibn al-Baitar - botany and pharmacology 27. Al-Farghani - astronomy and geography 28. Ibn Battuta - explorer and travel writer 29. Al-Khazini - physics and mechanics 30. Al-Kindi - music and philosophy 31. Al-Razi - medicine and alchemy 32. Ibn Rushd - philosophy and medicine 33. Ibn Sina - medicine and philosophy 34. Al-Zahrawi - surgery and medicine 35. Ibn al-Haytham - optics and physics 36. Al-Farabi - music and philosophy 37. Al-Maʾarri - poetry and philosophy 38. Al-Jazari - mechanical engineering and robotics 39. Al-Ghazali - philosophy and theology 40. Al-Masudi - geography and history 41. Al-Biruni - astronomy and mathematics 42. Al-Idrisi - geography and cartography 43. Ibn Tufail - philosophy and literature 44. Al-Tusi - trigonometry and algebra 45. Ibn Khaldun - sociology and historiography 46. Al-Battani - astronomy and mathematics 47. Al-Razi - medicine and alchemy 48. Ibn al-Nafis - circulatory system and pulmonary circulation 49. Al-Khazini - physics and mechanics 50. Ibn al-Baitar - botany and pharmacology
@@JunaidKhan-vw3dxWe came to listen to see if we can get any wisdom and since we didn't we give them wisdom that it's better to stay inside with your religion, what's wrong with that...
What you said makes ALOT of sense. I know I would never believe in a god like the Zionist in Israel or the Zionist in my own country the USA beleive in
Watch Our FIRST episode ➡ ruclips.net/video/QtetPPwP2s4/видео.htmlsi=Ylo4mO3T5pmy7nzV
If you had a basic education you wouldn't be posting videos of such baseless nonsense.
Allah est le dieu qui ne sait créer que des trous de cul bon à rien..et qui ne servent qu'à abrutir les gens 😂😂
Triste religion.
C'est écri dans le coran que le dieu Allah est con alors c'est une vérité absolue. 😂😂😂
Réfléchissez un petit peu monsieur le sheik😂
It was called big bang by English astronomer Fred Hoyle who was extremely critical of this theory and jokingly called it "big bang". The name stuck.
There are many astronomers / cosmologist / Physicists who have several criticisms of The " Big Bang " THEORETICAL MODEL
Sure, but it's still the best theory to explain the observed evidence.
@@Shikatanori-qf5gq yet its an incomplete theory. Things like inflation earlier on, dark matter, dark energy, latest discoveries of James Webb telescope, all mean that there are missing pieces.
@@owaisahmad7841 Sure there are missing pieces, but it explains more of the observed evidence than any other theory. That's why we believe it (until we find something better).
Before the creation only God existed infinitely. Then God created his throne then every thing else.
And noone lived happily ever after because all the fake gods tried to destroy each others' followers.
DONT FALL FOR THE SISTER YEMEN SCAM 😮
Just report scams
We don't even know if this scammer is a sister
She is a sister from Yemen, but she's collecting money to buy a new iPhone 😛
These comments are made by bots, most likely run by dudes in India as most large scale online scam operations are run in India.
@@Mr.Anders0n_ 🤣DO NOT REDEEM 🤣
I wonder if she's the sister of the Nigerian prince
It was named “the big bang” bu astronomer Fred Hoyle, who, at the time was a leading proponent of the “steady state universe”. The name “big bang” was a deliberately pejorative, an attempt to ridicule the theory. After multiple predictions from big bang theory were observed to be true in the 1960s (cosmic background radiation, distant galaxies all moving away from us) the name big bang just kinda stuck.
Great talk bring more of the shaikhs discussions - very educating maa sha Allah
Educating😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
_"I wonder why sometimes why did they call it the Big Bang, _*_maybe its to distract us..."_*
Although I am sure its not, this comes off intellectually lazy at best & intellectually dishonest at worst. Speaking on such a grand subject but not being aware of or not doing the due dilegence to find out, how the name came to be? As knowing how the "Big Bang" was coined instantly tells one it couldn't possibly have been to "distract" anyone from anything because it was coined by Fred Hoyle speaking sarcastically & in a pejorative manner... Moreover, Hoyle coined it in this manner as he was vehemently critical of the theory & preferred the "steady state theory" which describes the Universe with no beginning nor end but always expanding and creating new stars & galaxies.
When ppl of faith attach "alterior motives" & boogeymen to everything including the coining of terms, they end up being taken much less seriously by those not of faith, those most in need of Dawah.
learn how to spell "ulterior motives" before you give lectures about the least important part of the entire video. It is obvious he also meant it as a sarcastic response as well because a mere name doesn't distract the essence behind it.
What a silly criticism @@shark7698
Please dont tell me u think god is real 😂 @@shark7698
So are you saying he was being dishonest about all the facts he presented. You seem to be stuck as to why they named it the Big Bang which is up to speculation and also the least important aspect of this conversation. If it was the way you say was then why don’t they change the name now since we have more information and evidence. This is of course to distract us from the truth. Like he said it wasn’t a big bang per se but like blowing up a balloon and expanding. So he is right in saying that!
I'm attempting to find rational and intelligent reasoning for a person who is Muslim and am yet to see video's on RUclips that represent this state of being so far
“ And you see the mountains, thinking them rigid, while they will pass as the passing of clouds. [It is] the work of Allah, who perfected all things. Indeed, He is Acquainted with that which you do. “ Quran 27 : 88
Two opposing forces. Fusion or fission.I would speculate that what holds the Universe together is fusion as the primary force and fission as a secondary force. The big bang probably never happened but in quantum there still exists fusional functions and both opposing forces complement either other but I doubt that a big bang happened entirely. Bangs would appear as expansion exploding and imposing retraction.
It is no problem.
Hello Sheikh,
I am an undergraduate physics major with physics research experience and there are some flaws in your statements which I would like to respectfully correct for you Sheikh. Keep in mind I receive these corrections from my professors as well so I am just passing the knowledge along. You keep saying the universe is a certain way according to the Big Bang theory which is incorrect. The Big Bang theory is an idea explaining the current state of the OBSERVABLE universe. So why are you making claims about the “universe” when we are limited in our observability of it as a whole? The observable universe definitely has a beginning but that does not mean describing the universe as a whole beyond what we can observe also behaves the same way. What if time as a dimension behaves completely differently from what you would expect beyond the observable universe? In terms of this question I urge you to do research on the No Boundary Proposal. It is a fascinating idea and very mind-bending indeed.
In terms of the Olbers’ paradox, it was proposed in the year 1823 which is 82 years before the theory of Special Relativity was published. So he had no idea about Einstein’s discoveries which gives a solution showing how the speed of light “c” is constant causing light to take time to reach us from distant places and objects such as stars. This is why when you look out at the night sky you see mostly blackness because of the fact it is your distinct cosmological event horizon limiting when light can reach you.
Also I find it funny you are trying to say Dr. Stephen Hawking and Dr. Neil DeGrasse Tyson who are PhD physicists working in the field for years compared to you or me are wrong about some things relating to the Big Bang theory because you also fail to realize your own errors. Both me and you compared to them have a ton of humbling learning to do. If you want to use science to support your religious beliefs which they do not or even try to disprove scientific theories at least understand the information and take correction. We as scientists take correction and humbly admit our ignorance all the time which is why we can properly learn and make new discoveries. Therefore I hope you can also humble yourself to admit your own ignorance and take some time to read this comment while properly further researching like I am as well.
Thank you so much!
,Very Respectfully
Keith A. I. Huckleby
Well in your arguments you mentioned some errors of the speaker remember he's not a trained scientist nor he's teaching science. He's a theologian showing the importance of beliefs when we do science. Even though scientists can make errors.
In refutation of your arguments I would like to say you said bigBANG is an idea explaining the observable universe which is incorrect. bigBANG is the idea of how the universe began or came into being. But it is not a fact it's just a theorem to prove they discovered CMB thus claiming for proof of bigBANG which is not reality when you can't even see beyond CMB. For example before the advent of the bigBANG theorem people believed in another theorem called the "onion theory" ask your professor about it. So science can change at any time but not factual truth. Recent discoveries made by JWST are shocking for the scientific community It challenges the understanding of bigBANG.
Here is a link watch it.
ruclips.net/video/SgSITin3obc/видео.htmlsi=ZmjRcTTomN7JqZzo
People want to see God in their own eyes in order to believe in God now the same question applies can you show us bigBANG happening? You will say oh no it happened billions of years ago back then we didn't have cameras to record it how can I show you such an event but we have captured heat signatures called CMB it proves bigBANG which is an assumption.
For us the universe has a beginning and will end in the future it is not necessary how it began because it has nothing to do with theology unlike the atheistic secular world view denying the existence of God. The universe created in bigBANG or any other means that is irrelevant
@@TheMrZek Yes we as scientists make mistakes which is why we admit our errors and correct ourselves unlike religious people who simply want to believe as they wish in face of evidence against them. Because we as scientists actually correct our mistakes we are actually rethinking about the Big Bang theory in terms of what can be concluded about the universe beyond what is observable. Actually what I said was the Big Bang theory is an idea explaining the current state of the observable universe and no it an explanation of how the universe began because you obviously did not read what I said. How can you make any claim about the universe as a whole if you are limited in your observability of it? Not only that but when you look at the derivations our understanding of time breaks down the further you push towards the singularity.
Can you define what a theory is since you claim it is not a fact?
And yes you are correct about what you say when it comes to the CMB which goes back to what I said about how light takes time to reach us over longer distances.
But you are incorrect when you say we as scientists claim the Big Bang happened billions of years ago instead what we actually say is the Big Bang theory is an explanation of how the observable universe started it’s expansion which is still happening now. The Big Bang did not happen already, it is still happening because the expansion of the universe never stopped. As a matter of fact the expansion is accelerating.
I am watching the video you sent me which I will get back to you with some notes.
@@keith.anthony.infinity.h I too was a physics major and can understand a little bit of science. What is the standard model for bigBANG? I am not claiming anything just elaborating rationality.
@@TheMrZek Yes we as scientists make errors which is why I called out the theologian’s errors as I had the same conclusions he did and my professors corrected me. It seems like you are not listening either because if you read what I said in my previous comment I stated that the Big Bang theory is not an idea about how the universe began but rather about how the observable universe came to be in it’s current state specifically in terms of expansion. Saying the Big Bang is the beginning of the universe is incorrect because how can you make such a claim about the universe beginning when you are limited in your observability of it? You literally said it yourself we are limited in what we can observe beyond the CMB which is light so how can you make such bold claims about the universe? Your interpretation of the Big Bang theory explaining the beginning of the universe are out of date. Not only that but our understanding of how time as a dimension behaves at that scale is being questioned.
@@TheMrZek What do you mean by standard model exactly in terms of particles or the model of the Big Bang theory itself? Also I am watching the video you sent
which I am taking notes on right now.
The universe came by command and exists by command followed by opedience .
When there was Nothing there was ALLAH, and there will not be Anything there will be ALLAH, ...Alone ...
SHEIK HAMZA. A GIFT FROM ALLAH TO THIS UMMAH AND WORLD 🌎♥🙏❤💖💕🌎
"Once It was smoke and We caused it to ATHUNDER...we (Royal we) are IT'S EXPANDERS...we can make matter meet willingly or Unwillingly...And On THAT day we will scroll up the Heavens like a scroll untill it is NO MORE than a FIST FULL of MATTER...He who Originates the process of creation begins again!" This is in The Quran check it out!
It must have been made to exist is just a construct of the human way of thinking; why not extend it: God must have existed to cause the universe to begin so then what caused God to exist? Don't get out of it by saying He was always there because then you have to explain what "always" and "there" would mean in that context.
God by definition is uncaused, the necessary existence. You're pretty much asking who or what created the First Cause which makes no sense, like who baked the baker. The universe is contingent, it can't keep being dependent on something else forever. Every scientist worth his salt pretty much believes in a necessary existence, the atheist's among them just don't like to call it God and give it attributes that make God, God.
@@WeAreGhuraba every scientist... yeah right
@@ER-trapped So you have no argument... go learn what a necessary existence is cuz clearly this simple concept is foreign to you.
@@ER-trapped go learn the ontological argument.
@@WeAreGhuraba please don't assume what I can and cannot grasp. I don't have an argument/don't have time to carry on trying to counter obvious comebacks?
“ And He has cast into the earth firmly set mountains, lest it shift with you, and [made] rivers and roads, that you may be guided, “ Quran 16 ; 15
Our limited minds can never comprehend the everlasting magnitude of Almighty Allah (The Only One)
What does this show?
Wow that was amazing.
Well new gen scientist are now questioning bigBANG theorem they say bigBANG might be a wrong theorem. Listen what Hawking quotes "acording to" "acording to" what is this "according to" is!! He's not sure!! In science there is tendency to let assume a thing in first place. And there is a joke you must not assume bcz when you assume you made an Ass out of U & Me 😅
People are now questioning the project hawking too bcz back in the days how did a machine speak on behalf of human till today NASA has no evidence for that where is that wheelchair that spoke on behalf of hawking have you ever check/test that is even real or scam. I've seen it on the internet people are skeptical about hawking & his work. It's all about propaganda.
You should be providing this course for free!
If you make it payable, how can you ensure it reaches majority people?
Is this how will you spread islam amongst people?
I'm sorry which course are you referring to?
Sir, I am referring to ‘why Islam is true’ course , mentioned in your description.
We have a free 4-part video series called the Quranic Case for God, you can find that here: quraniccaseforgod.com/
As far as the Why Islam is True Course, this is what we do. We have trained over 500 teachers in 19 countries to teach it to their community on the ground. This includes Imams, Scholars, Prison Chaplains, Convert Care Centers, Youth Leaders and more.
We are also currently visiting 40 universities across America and giving away 4000 copies to university students this year, including free training and mentoring and workshops. You can find out more information on that here. whyislamistruefoundation.org/spreading-conviction-on-campus/
We are also created a convert development program which includes the Why islam Is True Course Free as well as other course plus mentoring sessions to help converts in their new journey and help them overcome convert related challenges, like family rejection, community integration etc. You can find out more information about that here: whyislamistruefoundation.org/converts-connect/
In addition to that, non-muslims looking into Islam get the course free.
In addition to that whenever someone purchases the course, 2 give 2 more courses away free.
In addition to that no one is turned down for lack of funds, we have a financial aid button on the checkout page and we mention this on the course page. If someone can not afford the payments, we have full scholarships.
So why are we charging, because the value and quality of the course is much more than what we charge, and we need those who can pay to pay so that we can continue our work worldwide and put this in every Muslims hand. We are also currently translating the course to different languages. All this costs money and resources, but still those can't afford to pay are not turned down just click on the financial aid button. We have never turned anyone down and we never will insha'Allah.
I hope that explains things a bit better. May Allah reward you, and please apply for financial aid. This course is too important not to take. Jazakum Allah Khayr.
Common. I suggest everyone to read the 30 year old simple book A brief history of time. All your simple questions are nicely explained there.
"We have evidence for God's existence". If there is, why not bring that forward and you won't need to go into all these explanations!
Tweedledum and Tweedledumer - a purity of ignorance sublime in its totality.
His frist premises just blows up all this god theory😂😂
How do you know any of this?
“ And when the heaven is split open and becomes rose-colored like oil “ Quran 55 : 37
WOW. All knowing professor ‼️
Give this guy Theoretical physicist Sean carrol book
So scientists who spent their whole life thinking about this question know only a little about it. Meanwhilw, you who read nothing other than Qur'an and Hadiths have this miraculous knowledge of it. Do you not feel embarassed to make such claims? Take a book of science and read it. You will actually learn something.
By the way, "if something exists then someone must have created it" argument is the most logic deprived, most low effort argument. How about, prove where the creator is first, then make claims?
If there isn't a creator, how can the universe exist? It came from nothing? It created itself?
@@chadimkila4868 i can ask the same question. Who created the one who created this world?
Are you telling me that the one who created these vast spans with billions of galaxies each with a trillion stars, chose to show up on one small planet revolving around a small star in an average galaxy, to reveal the truth that you're not supposed to eat pork? Are you really that child minded to believe this , when the evidence to look for is out there?
@@chadimkila4868 I could ask you back the same question: who created the one that created this universe?
I have a simple assertion: how about we just say, "I don't know". Personally , I would say, that this universe is so unimaginably vast and beyond understanding, that it is safe to say that we may never know whether or not there was a creator, let alone what language he chose to reveal the truth in or which animal he decided is clean to eat and which one is not .
With all the recent advancements in science and technology, to look out into the depths of this universe, seeing how unimaginably beyond our grasp it is, and then to sing that the one who created this vast universe is a simple-minded, childlike God who decides which people to punish and which people to save, is not just stupid, it is downright insulting to our place in this world as a thinking animal.
@@sca8217 You can't ask the question "Who created God? " because God has unique attributes.
Allah says in the Quran:
"Say: he is Allah the one
Allah is eternal and absolute
None is born of him and nor was He born
And there is none like him"
He is the creator, we can't compare him to the creation like the universe. Everything has a beginning and an end exept Allah.
There is no problem in saying "I don't know" but this does not mean that we don't have to think.
Even if the big bang Is real, something caused It. And this "something" had something that caused It too. We can go on forever. The Idea of an all powerful and eternal being that created everything is not illogical at all.
That's being said, there are other proof of Allah existence. Here some examples:
The Quran Is a literary masterpiece, no one in 1400 years brought up a better book.
The Quran does not have a single contradiction or mistake, if you don't believe It bring me an something.
Prophet Muhammad (SAW) said some prophecies and all of them came true or are becoming true. For example, he said that one day there will be sexual trasmitted diseases and It became true.
In the Quran there are miracles: Watch the video called " 27 undeniable miracles of the Quran".
An example is that Allah says the embryo looks like leech and the scientists confirmed it. The miracle Is that the embryo Is not visible to the human Eye When It looks like a leech so no one knew It 1400 years ago.
Why do you think that God has a childish mindset? If we can't undestand his plans this doesn't mean the He is wrong at all. It's the opposite, It proves that our brain Is limited.
PS: English Is not my first language, you could find some grammatical mistakes.
@@chadimkila4868 well, if that's the case, then any religious claim is to be believed . The Bible is reportedly the word of God and the truth according to Christians. Similar assertion to Muslims. Who's right then?
And a lot of the 'science' stated in the Quran is common knowledge. Are you seriously implying that people did not know sexually transmitted diseases before the Prophet Mohammed. Quran also said that the moon was split in two and the prophet rode on a winged horse. Why should anyone read that and say ',there are no contradictions' ?
I can take a book of science and work my way towards building a vehicle or an aeroplane. Can you do the same with your religious books?
Embryo does not look like a leech. Go into a biology lab and see what an embryo looks like. This is why I said, read books outside of your religious books. You will learn to appreciate the world better, creator or not.
Stubborn Atheists are going around little they know they are mortal and will find out Allah at some point
This is a great argument /s
@@Shikatanori-qf5gq it's literally not an argument
@@MyKC99 atheists do acknowledge that they are mortal. They do not believe that there will be a heaven with hoor after death.
I laugh at the pea minds who believe all this bullshit. Why doesn't he go to some international platform and prove his theory. And fetch some Nobel prize by proving what Steve Hawkins said wrong.
Atheists don't monopolize stubbornness
Every being exists in space-time.
Does it mean that the infinity dense singularity that exploded at the big bang didn't exist before the bag? 😅
We don't know if "before the big bang" makes sense. That could be like asking "what is north of the north pole?"
It actually means that the infinitely dense singularity that exploded at the big bang existed before the bag. BUT THAT SINGULARITY WAS CREATED BY GOD
@@abbaajiandassociatesllp7193 Why would God create a singularity and then disappear for 13 billion years until humans were created?
@@abbaajiandassociatesllp7193 Why is the big bang singularity not mentioned in the Quran?
What is that infinite singularity? Where was it? What was supporting it to be where it was? Who created it? Human beings cannot just agree that Allah Swt Created the multiverse. ?
Quran even did not know the number system and zero.
Qur'an is not a book of mathematics moreover numbers are concepts developed by humans. Even without a number you can write it alphabetically. Ie: one,two,three etc.
@@TheMrZek wow what a logic man, i am glad by your statement keep going you will become a prophet.
if its not written then why the hell they make these claims??
@@ShivamPrajapati-ix1qj what claim !!
BB?
When you squeeze universal content together they are packed into smaller volume, become denser?
What does happen?
Do you left behind.... empty space or there wasn't any universal space outside dense matter before the BB?
So what was outside then the dense universe, and in what and to where universal energy/matter has been expanding all these long?
The space outside the dense universal matter was never in BB balance sheet from the beginning!
I don't subcribe to BB theory!😮
this is so stupid. because it assume the big bang theory itself is correct. which is currently in doubt. so if the big bang never happen. then you all talking about god causing the big bang that never happen is quite stupid. it literally the blind making a map and people arguing if that is a tree or a rock on tha map, when the entire map is wrong.
Firstly, who says the big bang theory is in doubt? And if it were by the way, there is still evidence for the existence of God without the big bang, and that is the Quranic Argument from Contingency, the topic of your free video series called the Quranic Case for God, found here: www.quraniccaseforgod.com/
Who told you it's in doubt?
Big Bang cosmology remains the dominant model. It is not in doubt whatsoever. Astronomers would laugh at your ignorance.
@@alexojideagu Because we're still learning about the universe and any time things may turn out to be totally opposite.
Do u agree?
SuhanAllah Alhamdulilah la ilaha illallah Allahu Akbar Allahu Akbar Allahu Akbar.
If words refer to observable objects we can use those words to communicate with if we agree on the given definition. E.g., cat refers to a furry four legged mammal. No argument there. If you ask what the word "god" refers to, each religion has it's own definition. Why?
This is a great question, we actually go over the definition of God in Islam and it's rational proof thoroughly in our Why Islam is True Course, and we then further look at the 3 worldviews which differ based on their concept or definition of God. This creates a specific worldview. We show how the only worldview that is rational is the Islamic Worldview based on the Quranic definition of God using rational arguments presented with logical syllogism.
@@BasiraEducationwhere do you discuss Judaism? I did the course and didn’t see this mentioned as Judaism has a similar concept of God, does it not? Thank you
It doesn't work like that. In semitic culture, each word represents a caracteristic of the object or a beeing, written in its morphology. Example, Cat is not the animal but what it does, but you have to know first its origin, etymology : Cat came from semitic egyptian word Qit, this dwells the meaning of Cat. It came from old egyptian empire, where cats entered in the culture of humanity, and like various symbolic object written through hyeroglyph, the Cat came as representative tool or object among others in Pharoas court. See the meaning : "to be disposed, arranged". Don't think the words were created randomly. The word God has its own meaning, and Allah too. For Allah, it's about Dedication, through the archetyp L. For the word God, its origin is doubtful, probably a PIE "ghut" from a Yamna tribe in north caucasus between 5 or 6 thousand years ago. Your thoughts are always changing, but the word engraved a reality coming from thousand years ago, caracteristic. So, for you a cat is a "furry four legged mammal", for me it's a "beeing put closed to human". Not the same reality. I'm closer to the meaning of "Cat" than you. :)
@@BasiraEducationits hilarious that you think Islam is rational.
@@AllenAnderson-b6tit's hilarious how you comment against Islam while knowing nothing about it or the Qur'an. The Qur'an is full of rational pleas asking the reader to think, reflect, and use their intellect and to observe the natural world around them to find evidence for God and His creation. The Qur'an also asks the reader to not simply accept what has been handed down to them by their family and their society, but instead, to seek the truth themselves.
But you don't know about that and/or you don't care because your heart is full of hatred against Islam and Muslims. You arrogantly believe you know the truth without doing sincere research... Sincere research takes time and effort. Hateful trolling is so easy it can be done by children and teenagers 🤷🏻♂️
BIG BANG THEORETICAL MODEL
JazakAllah khair for this!
Nothing from where com's to Exist
1. False Dichotomy (Either-Or Fallacy):
The video sets up a dichotomy between belief in God and belief in an infinite, eternal universe, implying that the only two options are a universe created by God or a meaningless, eternal universe. This ignores other possibilities, such as alternative scientific explanations or other interpretations of cosmology.
Example: "If the universe began to exist, then it must have been made to exist by something that is not a physical object composed of mass energy existing in spacetime... God in other words."
This fallacy presents only two choices and ignores other potential explanations like multiverse theories or other unknown scientific models.
2. Argument from Ignorance (Appeal to Ignorance):
The video assumes that because scientists don’t know what caused the Big Bang, it must be God. It’s the “we don’t know, therefore God” reasoning, which is a classic argument from ignorance-asserting that a lack of evidence for one explanation proves another.
Example: "If scientists accept the Big Bang as fact, why do they hold on to the assumption that the Universe should be explained without God? How does that make sense? It doesn't make any sense."
Just because science doesn’t currently have all the answers doesn’t mean the answer must be divine intervention. This is jumping to a conclusion without sufficient evidence.
3. Straw Man Fallacy:
The video misrepresents the scientific community's position by suggesting that scientists "want to do science without God" or are biased against the idea of God. In reality, many scientists are simply looking for natural explanations, which is the core of scientific methodology. The claim that they are deliberately excluding God is a distortion.
Example: "They believed in an infinite time going back and Infinite Space because they wanted to do science without God."
This oversimplifies and distorts the motivations of scientists, setting up a weaker version of their position to knock it down.
4. Appeal to Consequences:
The argument in the video seems to imply that because it’s undesirable or irrational to believe the universe has always existed, it must therefore be false, and a creator must exist. This is an appeal to consequences-arguing that something must be true or false based on the desirability of its implications.
Example: "If the universe is infinite in size and it has an infinite number of stars... it shouldn't be dark... But we know the universe is dark at night, so the universe can't be infinite."
This assumes that an undesirable consequence (an infinitely old or large universe causing paradoxes) must mean the conclusion (a created universe by God) is true, which doesn't logically follow.
5. Begging the Question:
The video often assumes the conclusion it’s trying to prove: that God exists. It makes claims that rely on the assumption that the universe must have been created by God, without actually proving this. This circular reasoning assumes the answer within the question.
Example: "If the Big Bang happened then something made it happen, and that thing... is God."
This statement assumes what it's trying to prove-that the universe must have a divine creator.
6. Appeal to Authority:
There’s an implicit appeal to the authority of figures like Edwin Hubble or scientific discoveries, not as neutral facts but as evidence that somehow supports a theological argument. While the science presented is accurate, it’s used to lend undue credibility to a religious conclusion.
Example: "There have been many other scientific confirmations. Everybody believes in the Big Bang now..."
This tries to draw authority from scientific consensus on the Big Bang to suggest it supports belief in God, which isn’t a conclusion science draws.
7. Non Sequitur:
Some arguments in the video don’t logically follow from the premises. Just because the universe began to exist doesn’t mean it must have been created by a supernatural being. There’s a leap from cosmological facts to theological claims without a logical connection.
Example: "If the universe began to exist, it must have been made by something that is not part of the universe... Therefore, God."
This is a non sequitur because the conclusion (God exists) doesn’t logically follow from the premise (the universe began to exist).
8. Cherry-Picking:
The video only presents evidence that seems to support the existence of God, while ignoring other interpretations or explanations of the Big Bang. It focuses on gaps in scientific understanding to push a specific agenda.
Example: "Since then there have been many other scientific confirmations... the universe began to exist."
This uses the Big Bang as proof of a creator, while ignoring scientific discussions about quantum mechanics, multiverse theory, or other natural explanations that don’t involve divine intervention.
Wow, you managed to fuse peak Reddit with ChatGPT, is that the smartest atheists can bring up?
All of what you said here can be simply answered by the irrefutable Quranic Argument from Contingency. This is presented with the logical syllogism in a video found in our playlist " Thinking Muslim Guide to Atheist Arguments" I suggest you watch the videos in that playlist, and things will become more clear. If you have any questions about that argument, would love to discuss. Take care.
These Scientist believe that Iron is the core of earth, without the God.
Till today they can not proof it, While God clearly mentioned that Iron came from skies on earth, not part of earth.
Stupid scientist fooling people , and with their useless PhDs to earn money.,
@@adnanibnnoor_1so sorry you don't have a science degree 😂
@@BasiraEducation"irrefutable" Quranic Argument? This is pure comedy gold 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Takbeer!!
What does the Quran say about the earth just read it please .
Allah made the earth first when the heavens were still smoke !
Allah stretched out the earth like a bed . Bed is flat
Thumma doesnt mean first it isnt always a chornological meaning and the earth shaped like a bed doesnt mean its flat it would reffer to the fact that the arth id like our home wherw all people live unlike other harsh planets
@@makermaker11well said.
@@makermaker11doesn't mean first, doesn't mean flat: always need mental gymnastics to make the book fit the facts
Steve Hawken tested a very rough life in this world , and God knows what wipl came for him in the next life.
If God created the Universe (Complex thing), then who created God (even more complex thing)?
Which God created the universe? There are thousands of them.
Could a dead God (Zeus, Ra, Apollo, Mars, Jupiter) have created the universe?
How did this Muslim apologist rule out all these questions and arrive at Allah, for everything?
I have the answer and its easy, First of all God is only ONE God , no picture, no statue, no image. Written in all religious books. And the second part who created God is just a wrong question. I told you how. God is uncreated. Beyond time and space. If we say some thing is created we talk about past relative to time and space. God is one who created this time and the whole universe. Lets say if some created God then who created God is our God and then who created that God? So we continue until we reach to a God who is uncreated. God is a creator of everything. If some thing is being created is not a God.
These are great questions. But they come from the assumption that Muslims believe in a contingent God like other religions do. Islam is the only religion that doesn't believe in a contingent God. So we first have to logically determine does God exist and is he contingent? This is addressed in our Thinking Muslim Guide to Atheist's Argument. I wiss send the link below. you will also notice in that series is we are not using the Christian argument of Intelligent Design or Fine Tuning to prove God's existence, these arguments are weak and lead to the very valid counter argument you make in your opening, "Who Designed the Designer". We also address that in the playlist, but take it from video 1 first otherwise you will misunderstand what we mean by "God", that he is the necessary being that is not contingent. And there is rational proof for that which is presented. Here is the playlist Thinking Muslim Guide Playlist, ruclips.net/video/MYcCNqP7OAk/видео.html&list=PLeVtFJ5Wg2huMmciz8RiXxIvLT0To8vPu&index=1&t=40s
@@harisaslam573You still have a lot to answer:-
1.How did u know there is only one God(don't touch Quran because u will introduce another chain where u will have to prove authenticity of it)
2. How did u know that that God created the universe himself not through other creature of himself.
3.How did u know that it was Allah and not any other among 1000s worshiped.
4.Where is he? Inside of the universe or outside?
5.Why can't he talk himself to all people individually? Is he too shy? Or he can't? Or he just want many people go to hell?
@@bestmindcoolingrelaxationm1084 if you want to know i will tell you and answers all of the questions. This comment section is not enough place to explain all, you can share your email or number.
Allah also created "NOTHING" - nothing is hard to describe.
Flawed arguments based on misunderstandings about science. Again , the pinacle of blind faith bias . You should have looked for the origin of the name bigbang before making any allegations against scientists. The term “Big Bang” was coined as a somewhat mocking description by British astronomer Fred Hoyle during a 1949 radio broadcast. Hoyle, who favored a different theory (the steady-state model), used the term to describe the idea that the universe began from a singular, extremely hot and dense point before expanding. Despite the intention behind it, the name stuck.
Besides that, there are several misunderstandings in your arguments.
1. Misrepresentation of Science: You claim that scientists resisted the Big Bang theory because they didn’t want to believe in God. The broader scientific community accepts evidence-based theories. The Big Bang was resisted initially, not because it implied a beginning (and thus possibly a creator), but because it was a radical shift from the steady-state model, which had been favored for other scientific reasons at the time.
2. Olber’s Paradox Misinterpretation: The video mentions Olber’s Paradox to argue against an infinite universe. While it’s true that Olber’s Paradox points out that an infinite, unchanging universe would result in a bright sky at night, this has been addressed by the expanding universe model of the Big Bang, without needing to invoke the idea of God.
3. Misleading about the Big Bang and Time: You state that “if the Big Bang happened, something must have made it happen,” which implies a misunderstanding of causality. In modern cosmology, time itself begins at the Big Bang. Asking “what came before” is somewhat meaningless because “before” implies time, and time did not exist prior to this event. Many physicists, including Hawking, argue that there was no “before” in the way we commonly understand it.
4. Attributing the Cause to God: The jump from “something caused the universe” to “that something must be God” is a philosophical leap, not a scientific one. Even if we accept the universe had a cause, there is no evidence to suggest that this cause is conscious or has any of the attributes traditionally ascribed to God (like omniscience or omnipotence).
Your God exists only if you want it and stretch the reality for it to happen.
Why God has to create existance through very2 slow processes taking billions of years to create what we are today? God can just create it on spot instantly. Big bang may not be real or it may not be the beginning, it may be like a circle, without beginning. And the slow processes of creation could be running by nature. Unless if you think nature itself is a God. Nature has no beginning and infinite. How do you reply to this argument?
Excellent point
That billion of years time is for Us not for God. God is outside from time limitations. And he created this universe by laws and physical phenomina of nature.
@harisaslam573 Doesn't matter, we describe God based on reality, so we judge God also based on reality. God judge us also based on reality. Otherwise God is undecribable entity.
@@nazhasan428 you can still recognize God very easily by seeing his creation all around us including you and me. His signs are every where from a Galaxy to an atom. Signs for those who reflect.
@harisaslam573 As I said, you still have to look at reality to learn about God and so you can use reality to argue about God. One of them, the process of creation, as I mentioned, the suffering, disasters, inefficiencies (e.g birth defects, diseases, animal cruelty, so many planets are inhabitable, etc).
So, how do you know God is male?
God is not male or female. Allah is not a being. Allah consist of light/ nur that we as humanity cannot comprehend it's beauty of. Just look at nature around you and you can comprehend but an infistisimal iota of the beauty and mercy of Allah
Work on your reading comprehension skills. Lexography. Don’t be arrogant out of misunderstanding.
@@Southafrica-g5u So, why is God (Allah in your case) referred to as He/Him? Marxist pronouns? : )
@@jaketwigg1065 "Lexography" Word not found says my WordWeb desktop dictionary from Princeton.
@@crazyforcanada it is the royal HE. . And in this case we do not denote any sex to that HE cause Muslim implicitly and explicitly understand and accept that Allah is not it, he ,she. Allah is nur*light ..which encompasses compassion, beauty,justice, guidance. And as humans we cannot fathom the enormity of who Allah is but suffice to say we accept Allah as our creator and all the tenets that goes with islam.
"Religion was invented when the first con man met the first fool." - Mark Twain
The Hajj has been a Pagan ritual. They were circling Kaaba 7 times to worship their 7 Gods. Muslims are doing the same Hajj. Therefore, Muslims also worship 7 Pagan Gods when they do the Hajj.
The Hajj was adopted and adulterated by pagans long after the Prophet Ibrahim (as) and his son Prophet Ismaeel (as) built it together. Muslims reclaimed the Kaaba as their rightful inheritance from Ibrahim (as).
when We designated for Abraham the site of the House, [saying], "Do not associate anything with Me and purify My House for those who perform Tawaf and those who stand [in prayer] and those who bow and prostrate.(26) And proclaim to the people the Hajj [pilgrimage]; they will come to you on foot and on every lean camel; they will come from every distant pass -(27) -Surah 22:26-27
(Indeed, the first House [of worship] established for mankind was that at Bakka - blessed and a guidance for the worlds.) Surah 3:96
Psalm 84:5-6
New International Version
5 Blessed are those whose strength is in you,
whose hearts are set on pilgrimage.
6 As they pass through the Valley of Baka,
they make it a place of springs;
the autumn rains also cover it with pools.
No Muslim has ever worshipped 7 gods. Don't impose your falsehood on to Islam
Why then that even in written in the Thorah/Old testament !???
Than when this Prophet ( s.a.w.s.) arrived in Arabia, even pilgrimage animal sacrifice are allowed and pleased God !???
🤭😂😂😂
My prophet (s.a.w.s) is in the Thorah prophecy’s !!!
God commanded : Everyone must follow his command and teachings !!!!
When not, good luck in afterlife !!!
God made me a cripple. So God deas not excist.
The ignorance of this maulvi is infinite.
Tohu vavohu
Where other cultural stories of creation had/have both a male and female deity to make the creation going in cycles, the Abrahamic story of creation has lost this natural mytho-logical part of the telling, having just an invisible male god in which we all simply and unnaturally have to believe in.
The very idea of a Big Bang or of any beginning of the Universe is de facto contradicted in the numerous cultural Stories of Creation themselves.
Our ancestors all over the world had/have an ETERNAL CYCLICAL PERCEPTION of both the micro- and macrocosm, constituted by a principal TRIAD process of an eternal Creation, Dissolution, and Re-Creation in the Universe. No beginning and no end at all.
When our ancestors spoke of a beginning, it was specifically about the pre-conditions of and the factual creation telling of the Milky Way galaxy and the Solar System.
Otherwhere else in the cosmos they had “Islands sailing in the Cosmic Ocean” for other galaxies.
When historic and present scholars have no clues of this several thousands of year-old specific Milky Way Mythology telling, they have no other possibilities but to take it literally for an initial creation of the entire Universe. - Which de facto is very unscientific in all accounts.
And the very same goes for educated scientists who in fact could have got the natural explanations by interpreting the ancient Creation Stories correctly.
Search for mor informations here: native-science (dot) net
Best Wishes
Ivar Nielsen
Comparative Mythologist & Natural Philosopher
Denmark
Everything created by allha. Becarefull allha is watching
Allah. Not allha
No god at all.
One can always trust an apologist to butcher scientific data and theories in his attempt to prove his religion. This guy is no exception. The way he revealed how he has NO clue of the origin for the cosmic microwave background radiation was painful to watch... 🙄
He is repeating what he has read on popular scientific level without understanding the actual science. And with this middle school-level understanding of science, he's claiming to being able to debunk actual experts in the field.
This mullah is knowledgeable about the physics, so credit where credit is due. However, he is missing the very obvious question: if Allah is responsible for the Big Bang, why is it never mentioned in the Quran?
The Quran spends pages and pages detailing the punishments for non-believers, but cannot spend a few words explaining the fundamentals of the universe.
@@Shikatanori-qf5gq the mullah is incredibly ignorant about physics.
This is coming. Shaykh Hamza is also knowledgeable about the Quran and teaches Tafseer at a very high level, so he will go into this in further videos insha'Allah, the series is just starting. We appreciate your support and look forward to your future feedback.
@@BasiraEducation is the scientific evidence for the universe قطعيّ according to the sheikh? This might be debatable, and does big bang mean ex-nihilo?
Jazakallah
@@BasiraEducation Thank you. Looking forward to it.
I agree
alhamdulillah. amazing dawa. thanks
😂😅
Waiting his demonstration that the Big-bang doesn't appear in the Torah : bereshit Bara' Elohim The Skies and the Earth. It needs hight skill in semantic to understand this verse. It is said that The Skies were separated from the Earth برء . The Big-bang appears in the very beginning of the Torah, Genesis 1.1. Also, Sma' (sky= means something, and Earth too : it's not about "things" nor object, but a process. Allah ta'ala says in the Qur'an the state of Skies and Earth before the beginning, رتق. Philosopher philosophing could deny Big-Bang concept came from Genesis 1.1, in vain. Better to focus on linguistic and semantic when it's about God's words.
Yo do not even have any Torah, man made fallacy and filth, not a sinlge alphabet is from Almighty God.
One God, One langauage for all mankind that is the Arabic, One Book for all mankind to which idiots today call as the Quran..
JazakaLlah sheikh
The Big Bang …
“Do the disbelievers not realize that the heavens and earth were ˹once˺ one mass then We split them apart? And We created from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?” Surah 21:30
Yes, but the word رتق that Allah ﷻ used in the ayah doesn't denote a ball like what modern science allege what the big bang was at its singularity point. It can mean joined mass, but it can also mean something that is plugged. In this specific ayah, the Quranic description is intentionally a generic description to be comprehendible and fluid for its local time and audience. The meaning "plugged" works perfectly for the desert arab 1400 years ago, as for them, this literally meant: "haven't the disbelievers seen how both the sky and the earth were both plugged, the sky had no clouds in it to rain, and the earth is a barren land with no life in it, then Allah has opened both: the sky causing it to pour rain down which caused the plantations to open the earth and grow?" and then He said "and We made from [that] water [which We brought down] everything [from those plants, animals and humans] thrive - so will they not [then] believe?". But the miraculous comprehension of the Quran also has the capacity to point to (what modern science call today of the theory of the beginning of the universe) the big bang, as well as the the fact that all living organisms contain water in the cellular level, which makes the translation that you used also valid for our time of scientific discoveries and advancements. Subhan Allah.
@@Overfloater777 thanks for that fairy story. Very convincing.
@@Overfloater777 with all due respect, I disagree with your assessment, i understand the Arabic language sometimes can be a challenge to non Arabic speaking and even to Arabic speaking people …, كانتا رتقا، means there were joined to gather, ففتقناهما ، we split them, don’t read into the context more than what it says. The Quran was not written for the people 1400 years ago only, 1400 years ago they could not fathom the meaning of this Ayah, this Ayah for our generation to show the disbelievers that the Quran could not have been written by a human 1400 years ago
This sentence is so vague and can be interpreted in so many ways. If Allah meant to talk about the Big Bang, he should have said so directly.
@@Shikatanori-qf5gq you want people to keep wandering for 1400 years what does the Big Bang means? It doesn’t work that way, they are many things that are still vague in the Quran for future generations and discoveries, in addition don’t try to confirm the Quran to their discoveries, for an example they keep saying space dust in the universe while God says smoke… what comes out an explosion? Smoke not dust …who is more truthful than Allah?
Before any conclusions are claimed for any god - you MUST show that it exists. Without this - everything that follows is just a pointless stream of baseless conjecture .
You are correct, this is what we have done in our videos you can find in our Thinking Muslim Guide to Atheist's Argument. This series on God's Cosmos deals with the Big Bang and science. You can find the proof that God exists in this playlist. Notice, we don't use intelligent design or fine tuning, these are weak arguments and lead to he valid counter argument made by atheists known as "Who Designed the Designer". You can find the Thinking Muslim Guide Playlist, here. ruclips.net/video/MYcCNqP7OAk/видео.html&list=PLeVtFJ5Wg2huMmciz8RiXxIvLT0To8vPu&index=1&t=40s Would love to hear your feedback on those videos, we have others which will be coming the series is still growing.
Why don't you sit and talk with Neil and live stream it.
When a man goes to heaven, he will get to spend time with 72 beautiful women 24/7. What about women? What do they get when they go to heaven?
damn man ...genuine question
They will spend time with 72 supermen of course.
Frist ask where did egg come from? Hen. Now ask where did hen come from? God. Now ask where did god. Come from?...
Now if anyone answers he came from nothing... Congratulations you just become atheist 💐🎊💯
God did not come from something, he is eternal. Not everything need a cause rather every contingent need a cause.
@@ali-55928 that's as ridiculous as infinite energy
😂😂😂 pure garbage science
What exactly are you referring to that is garbage?
"pure garbage science"
- I doubt you're intelligent enough to criticise it.
@@BasiraEducation The garbage is that you fail to understand the difference between Universe and observable universe.
When scientist say the universe originate from the big bag, they don't mean the whole universe, they mean observable universe, when they say the universe is expanding they mean observable universe etc so we've not yet observe the whole universe till this time, and that's where you're trapped..
Those religious arguments that tries to prove science wrong are the one that kicked me out of Islam and for that I say Allah huaakbaaaaar..🎉
My friends, there is only One Hero in this story. Jesus Christ!
Before God spoke a Word, time as we know it was not made.
How does the Big Bang Theory disprove God when it only adds to the obvious power of His Word to those who refuse to simply repent and know His Undeniable Power?
What is the definition of power to people?
In every rational way, the atheist is a fool.
God is not a theological idea. God is a Living Spirit Who desires a relationship with you.
Can you not see the testimonies?
Here am I to confess my dependence on Jesus Christ for everything!
God gave me Dignity. I could not do it myself, God will do the same thing for any who call upon His name and have a true heart
Fascinating
@@Ashour.H garbage
Having the kid sit in front of you so that you have someone to talk to is pretty goofy. Just talk directly to your audience 🤦♂️
It's called an interview Einstein.. wth does it matter if He's talking to someone or not You are still hearing him. And he is not a "kid", he's a grown man.. wth is wrong with you 🤦🏽♂️
@@bangbang-nb7gi that was absolutely NOT an interview😂
So Sad to hear, where the speaker says, muslims follow their DEEN,
there no such thing in Quraan that msulims follow their own dean, Just like not a single verse contasin name of Muahmmad and word Quran or Book given to him.
Mushriqeen have their Deen, for muslims DEEN has no personal meaning, it is the charactersitic of Almighty God, the way HE wants to run or judge the people.,
Muhammad is mentioned in: Ali 'Imran 144, Ahzab 40, Muhammad 2, Fath 29.
Qur'an appears 70 times. Deen of a Muslim is the deen of Allah
Lol this is what happened when you get your science from ancient book called Quran 😂
Do you have any specific criticism of what is said in the video, something you can point out which is incorrect? If so we would be gladly to discuss. Open minded discussion is how we all move forward.
Everything said was very accurate according to science
Show the proof if you are truthful . if not it's up to you
@@BasiraEducation You're not open minded because no matter what you're required to always defend Quran, so you're either lying to us or you don't know the meaning of open minded..
Being open minded is to not attempt to prove something after you believed that it's true. Let me ask this question to test your open mindedness,. Can Islam be false and Quran not from God ? Could it be possible that true God is YAHWE and not ALLAH?
@@hehepet Your sheikh assumes that the big bag was the begining of the universe while we don't have access to the WHOLE UNIVERSE, Big bag is the begining of the OBSERVABLE UNIVERSE.
He just say things to defend Islam and that is to me stupidity you have to see things as they are and not to try to pull them to your side .
look, a half dead person on a wheelchair making up theories and strangely being interviewed !
He was more intelligent than you could even ever hope to be.
Let's hope that you succumb to the same condition that he had, shall we ?
At least we know that he existed.
Quite right, no one should speak to or listen to a physically disabled person, even if that person has a PhD in cosmology. Obviously, we should also mock and ignore any imam who uses a wheelchair.
You should saty in Quran .not in science.it's not for u .
I laugh everytime I see these so called "geniuses" claiming the universe came out of nothing. They believe in "the big bang" but refuse to believe in the thing that caused it. No many braincells, so little thought.
@@syence_nird so we've established you've not got a science degree 🤣🤣🤣
@@midlander4 I have two degrees, one in biochem and another is mechanical engineering. What have you been able to accomplish from your moms basement?
@@syence_nird no you don't 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Why are you trying to insult people rather than providing convincing arguments?
@@Shikatanori-qf5gq because they're not providing any convincing arguments, and they don't have any interest in doing so. It's just xtian white noise, and it's insulting to anyone who cares about intellectual honesty.
Hilarious ! Islam trying to explain science. My dog knows more science.
Try looking these up before commenting out of your arrogant western ignorance 1. Al-Khwarizmi - algorithm and algebra
2. Jabir Ibn Hayyan - chemistry and alchemy
3. Ibn Sina - medicine and philosophy
4. Al-Farabi - music and philosophy
5. Al-Kindi - optics and medicine
6. Ibn al-Haytham - optics and physics
7. Nasir al-Din al-Tusi - astronomy and mathematics
8. Omar Khayyam - mathematics and poetry
9. Ibn Rushd (Averroes) - medicine and philosophy
10. Ibn Battuta - geography and travel writing
11. Al-Ghazali - philosophy and theology
12. Ibn Nafis - anatomy and medicine
13. Ibn Zuhr - surgery and medicine
14. Al-Maʾarri - poetry and philosophy
15. Al-Jazari - mechanical engineering and robotics
16. Al-Masudi - geography and history
17. Al-Biruni - astronomy and mathematics
18. Al-Idrisi - geography and cartography
19. Ibn Tufail - philosophy and literature
20. Al-Tusi - trigonometry and algebra
21. Ibn Khaldun - sociology and historiography
22. Al-Battani - astronomy and mathematics
23. Al-Razi - medicine and alchemy
24. Ibn al-Nafis - circulatory system and pulmonary circulation
25. Al-Khazini - physics and mechanics
26. Ibn al-Baitar - botany and pharmacology
27. Al-Farghani - astronomy and geography
28. Ibn Battuta - explorer and travel writer
29. Al-Khazini - physics and mechanics
30. Al-Kindi - music and philosophy
31. Al-Razi - medicine and alchemy
32. Ibn Rushd - philosophy and medicine
33. Ibn Sina - medicine and philosophy
34. Al-Zahrawi - surgery and medicine
35. Ibn al-Haytham - optics and physics
36. Al-Farabi - music and philosophy
37. Al-Maʾarri - poetry and philosophy
38. Al-Jazari - mechanical engineering and robotics
39. Al-Ghazali - philosophy and theology
40. Al-Masudi - geography and history
41. Al-Biruni - astronomy and mathematics
42. Al-Idrisi - geography and cartography
43. Ibn Tufail - philosophy and literature
44. Al-Tusi - trigonometry and algebra
45. Ibn Khaldun - sociology and historiography
46. Al-Battani - astronomy and mathematics
47. Al-Razi - medicine and alchemy
48. Ibn al-Nafis - circulatory system and pulmonary circulation
49. Al-Khazini - physics and mechanics
50. Ibn al-Baitar - botany and pharmacology
Arrogance has limits but these 🤡 has no limit also my dog is not arrogant like u bro😅😅
@@kashsidd I will actually do that. Please recommend a site that has a reliable, accurate translation of these. Thank you.
Deaf, dumb and blind, you will never accept the truth.
... just read your Qur'an and be quiet ... you can not teach us ANYTHING ...
Don't listen, simple
@@JunaidKhan-vw3dx ... yeah, ass up, head in the sand ... when will you grow up ...?
@@JunaidKhan-vw3dxWe came to listen to see if we can get any wisdom and since we didn't we give them wisdom that it's better to stay inside with your religion, what's wrong with that...
Here comes the Arabian desert cultist to claim the spot 🤣🤣🤣🤣
What you said makes ALOT of sense. I know I would never believe in a god like the Zionist in Israel or the Zionist in my own country the USA beleive in
More like Bhosda Education.