Back in the late 1980's I had a computer program called "Chessmaster 2000". It had this game in its library along with Anderssen's immortal. Thank you for reminding me of my earliest days of playing chess. Your channel helped revive my interest. PS back in those days it was actually possible to beat a computer at chess.
Suren, thank you for sharing this beauty of chess! ❤ Just for a suggestion, at 5:45 you could have analized also the line started with the black knight taking the rook on d8 (so Qd7+!, etc), because it's maybe a not so obvious line to see 👍 I'm a fan of your channel, congrats! 👏👏
The position at 4:04 is quite complicated. Stockfish analysis at Chess.com gives ...Bd4 and ...Qh3 as equal, and ...Rg4 is just barely in white's favor.
Then Qd7+(!), followed by Bf5 (double check), entering again in a mating line similar to the lines showed on the video. But I agree with you that this line should also have been analysed as the other lines 👍
Then Qd7+(!), followed by Bf5 (double check), entering again in a mating line similar to the lines showed on the video. But I agree with you that this line should also have been analysed as the other lines 👍
The compromised defense [chesstempo.com/gamedb/opening/884 or www.365chess.com/eco/C52_Evans_gambit_compromised_defence] is playable for Black, although it's given as "bagels" (0.00) by stockfish, and probably by other strong chess engines. It's not easy to play for either side. Even the great Johannes Zukertort played it incorrectly, though his play was often better than that of his opponent. Reuben Fine played it quite badly in a loss to Bobby Fischer in 17 moves.
Although I've analyzed the evergreen game before, I just analyzed it for the first time with stockfish 9. It's sort of a shame that there were several blunders in the game. Some were mentioned in this video but others were not. There were also a few minor errors and inaccuracies. The final combination was sparkling but the game as a whole was not. For example, 15. ... Qf5?? should have been a losing move. Then later, 17. Nf6?? let Dufresne back in the game. Then 19. ... Qxf3?? threw the game away again. Sure it's easy to criticize the players using stockfish, but it was a casual game and there was nothing on the line.
They're similar channels on youtube that both have their own style, maybe he just doesn't enjoy Agad's style and dislikes the way he commentates over a game. This can really quickly turn into mutual disrespect, so I wouldn't recommend Suren to ever face Agad.
Psclly That’s fair but I really cannot believe as I’ve seen suren comment on agadmators channel with nice comments and he’s always responded. Plus people comment it on agads channel asking and he responds saying he’d be fine for a game.
I’m the last person to say this, but wow. The entire format/thumbnail is agadmator. Look at the two thumbnails. Board on right, green background on left with the player, and finally, the same exact position with the same things highlighted. It’s just too similar.... (even the titles are around 1 word off)
Adolf Anderssen is simply superb fantastic game even Morphy would have said bravo take a bow Anderssen well if Anderssen was so good how and more importantly why did he lose to Morphy he got crushed by Morphy any answers anyone suren sir can you answer that question
✔️ For the "Immortal Game" check out the link below...
👉 ruclips.net/video/Y_755Ri1mZ4/видео.html
Suren I was surprised you hadn’t covered it already😁great video
I’m glad that when I first started playing Chess that Suren was the first RUclipsr I discovered.
Suren you r a great and interesting guy suren, I hope you ll never stop making videos!
çhess
I love your videos
Adolf Anderssen is just one move away from getting checkmated. He managed to checkmate his opponent first with a very beautiful combination.
Back in the late 1980's I had a computer program called "Chessmaster 2000". It had this game in its library along with Anderssen's immortal. Thank you for reminding me of my earliest days of playing chess. Your channel helped revive my interest.
PS back in those days it was actually possible to beat a computer at chess.
Thank you Chris, I also had that program, but I remember even my chessmaster was strong for me in those days
For the top players yes but even my super Nintendo chess master was brutal.
Your English is very easy to understand. Thank you
Truly a fantastic game
Suren, thank you for sharing this beauty of chess! ❤
Just for a suggestion, at 5:45 you could have analized also the line started with the black knight taking the rook on d8 (so Qd7+!, etc), because it's maybe a not so obvious line to see 👍
I'm a fan of your channel, congrats! 👏👏
Suren vs agamd like if you want this happen
it will be great to see a game between them
Ya it would be awesome
Definitely!
So true i will sell my house for ther match 😂😂😂
Agadmator wins because he is CM
truly worth another rewatch‼️®™️
never gets old.....
Fantastic
Mr. Andersen certainly was no one to be underestimated at the table,,,
One of my fav games. Anderssen was amazing.
Fantastic hidden calculation!!👌 Very nice.Thank you.
And now imagine, that black never played the dubious move b5. We would miss this great game.
It's really evergreen game
Thank you suren.
I love the idea of the queen sacrifice.
2:16 Doubius is back
Messias Überking Yes!!!
But you can't even spell "dubious."
amazing!! excelent calculation.
Black was also threatening mate in 1 on g2, but, white was much faster.
Truly evergreen game Suren Sir!
Happy birthday Suren!
BTW: Today is also my birthday
Moudar Alali 🎈 Happy Birthday!
🔥 🔥 🔥
💟 💟 💟
💟 💟 💟
🍰🍰🍰🍰🍰🍰🍰🍰
🍰🍰🍰🍰🍰🍰🍰🍰
🍰🍰🍰🍰🍰🍰🍰🍰
🍰🍰🍰🍰🍰🍰🍰🍰
👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑
🎈 Happy Birthday!
🔥 🔥 🔥
📍 📍 📍
📍 📍 📍
🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂
🎂🍓🎂🍓🎂🍓🎂🍓
🍓🎂🍓🎂🍓🎂🍓🎂
🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂
🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂
1:02 date and time 😂
6:14 Dubious bird chirps on the background :D Suren recording from a forest :D
This game n so many other such games from the romantic era piqued my interest in chess. Beautiful n evergreen indeed!!
Wow Anderssen played like Paul Morphy :O
Sooper.... !!
1:02 I thought it was a ghost..😂
If you ever make merch, I vote for a shirt that says "A Dubious Decision"
Suren true say...that was truly fantastic game...it seems that we should say thanks for this game
The position at 4:04 is quite complicated. Stockfish analysis at Chess.com gives ...Bd4 and ...Qh3 as equal, and ...Rg4 is just barely in white's favor.
👏👏‼️®™️ "Of course this is a rewatch"
👏
5:44 what happens if black knight takes white rook?
Then Qd7+(!), followed by Bf5 (double check), entering again in a mating line similar to the lines showed on the video. But I agree with you that this line should also have been analysed as the other lines 👍
What if 5:53 the black play nxd8 , whats the continuation?
Best attack ever seen ❤️❤️❤️👍
5:47 Be4+ looks dubious due to Qxd1+, maybe you mean Be2+
*_břüťãļ_* checkmate
4:38 What if White plays Nxd4?
In 5:43 after Rook d8 what happened of black takes Rook with his knight
Then Qd7+(!), followed by Bf5 (double check), entering again in a mating line similar to the lines showed on the video. But I agree with you that this line should also have been analysed as the other lines 👍
About the description. It's either "The Evergreen Game" or "Die Immergrüne Partie"
1:02 Is the analysis run on a laptop?
Pls do analysis for praggu Vs Wesley so
@5:42 what if black knight takes the white rook at d8, then the black is safe?
Simply sac Queen on d7 then Bishop will coming and finish the job in two moves
Do the immortal game next
yea, should publish that as well
Always follow suren
Brutal
The compromised defense
[chesstempo.com/gamedb/opening/884 or
www.365chess.com/eco/C52_Evans_gambit_compromised_defence]
is playable for Black, although it's given as "bagels" (0.00) by stockfish, and probably by other strong chess engines. It's not easy to play for either side. Even the great Johannes Zukertort played it incorrectly, though his play was often better than that of his opponent.
Reuben Fine played it quite badly in a loss to Bobby Fischer in 17 moves.
Although I've analyzed the evergreen game before, I just analyzed it for the first time with stockfish 9. It's sort of a shame that there were several blunders in the game. Some were mentioned in this video but others were not. There were also a few minor errors and inaccuracies. The final combination was sparkling but the game as a whole was not.
For example, 15. ... Qf5?? should have been a losing move. Then later, 17. Nf6?? let Dufresne back in the game. Then 19. ... Qxf3?? threw the game away again. Sure it's easy to criticize the players using stockfish, but it was a casual game and there was nothing on the line.
Suren why do you always disregard the comments asking you to play agadmator? Do you guys dislike each other or?
There is no reason, that they play against each other.
montetank tankkiller what?
They're similar channels on youtube that both have their own style, maybe he just doesn't enjoy Agad's style and dislikes the way he commentates over a game. This can really quickly turn into mutual disrespect, so I wouldn't recommend Suren to ever face Agad.
Psclly That’s fair but I really cannot believe as I’ve seen suren comment on agadmators channel with nice comments and he’s always responded. Plus people comment it on agads channel asking and he responds saying he’d be fine for a game.
Why do they have to have a match?
hi suren! have a good day :D
Which software u use to show the game?
At 5.44 what if kxd8
What a fantastic game, also with a kamikaze rook included! ;-)
Just wow
At 5:49 black can answer Be4+ with Nd4. White doesn't have a way to force a win.
Trinston was here
Breliant🤩🤩👍👍
In 1:03 what was that
Since move 11 the bishops were placed perfectly for total destruction! Suren, don't you think it's time for hiking with your magnetic chess set? 👍
Dubious title
5.41, Knight can take the rook and threaten mate in 1
Then maybe
Qd7+ k×d7
Bf5+ Ke8
Bd7 checkmate
Another brutal checkmate😂😂😂
After Bd4, if Nxd4 instead cxd4 what happens? (@ 4:16)
Rxg2 sacrifice?
Yes...Rxg2+ and if Kxg2 then Nxd4+ Kf1 Qh3+
wow i would have going for the queen first with the discovery check by rook
5:31 you made a mistake queen could’ve captured the Bishop in that scenario
Not possible because it was a discover check of ruk
Great video just a bit 2 fast for me
Saying good luck was missing at the end of video!
Deep
A Botez Gambit!!! xD
plz first of all show the orignel game then add your oppinion and options
Black did more inaccuracy moves
I’m the last person to say this, but wow. The entire format/thumbnail is agadmator. Look at the two thumbnails. Board on right, green background on left with the player, and finally, the same exact position with the same things highlighted. It’s just too similar.... (even the titles are around 1 word off)
Adolf Anderssen is simply superb fantastic game even Morphy would have said bravo take a bow Anderssen well if Anderssen was so good how and more importantly why did he lose to Morphy he got crushed by Morphy any answers anyone suren sir can you answer that question
I think Bb5 instead of Bf5 mates faster
Paul Morphy was the strongest player in that day.
Title: most beautiful game ever
Suren: one of the most beautiful game ever 🙄
😊😊
5:44 kEmMiKaZeh
Why are you everywhere play your piano i wanna see ir performance
wowwwww
U know vockai lovers
The game that mvl played was more beautiful imo.queen sac.exchange sac.promotion to a knight !!
suren vs agadmator will be a dubious game. lol jk.
T.h.i.s c.o.m.m.e.n.t I.s t.o t.r.i.c.k y.o.u.t.u.b.e keep. Up the good work, me and my son love this
First comment
you take your contant from adgamtor's
so when agad uploads something which KC, Mato or Chess to impress had already published do you also tell him that he is a copycat???
Suren don't be mad I love your vids, I just think you should make more frash contant that is not online yet.....
man but these are classical games, which I think everyone should have on their channel, so let's stop accusing each other of copying
These games r truly iconic these deserve to be on every chess channel it wasn't copied
Keep up the great work, Sir! Love your videos!