PFAS and How to Remove the Silent Threat in Our Water

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 31 янв 2025

Комментарии • 132

  • @annunacky4463
    @annunacky4463 3 года назад +35

    I worked at a chemical plant in the late 70’s. I was an environmental chemist. Based on what I saw and measured, I have been drinking filtered water ever since then. Even our plant water system and drinking fountains were contaminated one time after a piping repair mistake. I was told to keep it quiet. I didn’t. Superfund site now.

    • @mikeholloway2625
      @mikeholloway2625 3 года назад +1

      The money was never super funded you know? Nothing was cleaned up...

    • @jones8610
      @jones8610 3 года назад +1

      What kind of water do i drink for safest

    • @mikeholloway2625
      @mikeholloway2625 3 года назад

      @@jones8610 IDK...

    • @annunacky4463
      @annunacky4463 3 года назад +1

      @@jones8610 distilled water is safe, but take minerals to supplement.

    • @jones8610
      @jones8610 3 года назад +2

      @@annunacky4463 how about Poland spring water

  • @labronco7511
    @labronco7511 3 года назад +71

    You should have mentioned the fact that PFAS accumulates in our bodies, and there is no way to remove it.

    • @NancyBeegle
      @NancyBeegle 3 года назад

      Yes. Took a 6.5 hour tubing trip on the Au Sable July of last year. Got severely burned (first time in 63 years of being in the water in the sunlight). Still sick, lost lots of (not excess) weight, and feels like I'm burned all over still.

    • @becky5937
      @becky5937 3 года назад +1

      Wow thank you for the notice

    • @JodBronson
      @JodBronson 3 года назад

      *OP = 100% !!!*

    • @mikeholloway2625
      @mikeholloway2625 3 года назад +7

      Really that is so true... the only way you can be PFAS free is if you were born more than 300 years ago. That was back in the day when 1 in 100,000 people contracted cancer. Yes. That little tid-bit of a finding is verifiable in a physicians clinical study. I will give you a hint. He was Italian.

    • @NancyBeegle
      @NancyBeegle 3 года назад +3

      @@mikeholloway2625 Truth.. However, there's a huge difference between having some in you, and not suffering any ill effects and being older and totally toxic/very ill from being overloaded.

  • @BEDWITHDAD
    @BEDWITHDAD 3 года назад +137

    Why should the burden to remove PFAS be placed on treatment plants, and not the manufacturers? Ultimately, you're asking rate payers to bare the cost burden instead of the manufacturers that create the problem in the first place. Please be more transparent in what can be done. Let's just remove PFAS from products altogether.

    • @ampm8210
      @ampm8210 3 года назад +8

      Because it's easier and cheaper for the companies to point the blame and solution at the customer's. Look at what CocaCola did, went from glass and people avidly getting paid to recycle to plastic and pointing the blame at people not recycling. If it's more profitable then it will be done, politicians also get bribed and blackmailed making good progress difficult.

    • @MM-le9en
      @MM-le9en 3 года назад +11

      Exactly, this is what all this big contaminating companies are promoting while they are still getting money and dont pay all the bad results we get in our environment.

    • @deborahschumann8286
      @deborahschumann8286 3 года назад +9

      Except that the manufacturers of toxic materials have such a strong hold on all industry and hence our lawmakers. No matter what the mess is they create, we the tax payers get the bill. And in many cases, the taxpayer is also the victims of toxic poisoning….. isn’t capitalism great? The only things that get done are what produces a profit.

    • @ampm8210
      @ampm8210 3 года назад +5

      @@deborahschumann8286 people only point out the negatives and never appreciate the positives in capitalism.

    • @playonce4186
      @playonce4186 3 года назад +3

      its already polluted and cant be removed that easily it may takes decades cause its everywhere

  • @ApriliaRacer14
    @ApriliaRacer14 3 года назад +8

    It’s in Aquas Film Forming Foam (AFFF) the foam mandated to be used in fighting aircraft accidents on all airports in United States. There have been major discharges on every airport for decades.

  • @Deb-of2vq
    @Deb-of2vq Год назад +2

    Very informative!

  • @cupwalker24.7
    @cupwalker24.7 2 года назад +4

    What if you are Driller in the Environmental industry and drill for PFAS everyday and install Beautiful monitoring wells and pumping wells everyday all day and slop around in pfas .... how long do I have . . Just completely covered in pfas everyday ? Just wondering how many days I have .

  • @jimbob-jn6jz
    @jimbob-jn6jz 3 года назад +31

    There is a movie about this called Dark Waters 2019.

  • @IndigenousRuuchuuUchinaa
    @IndigenousRuuchuuUchinaa 3 года назад +11

    the US marine base in Okinawa just dumped PFOA contaminated water into the public drainage ignoring both Okinawa Prefectural and Japanese government a few days ago

    • @ApriliaRacer14
      @ApriliaRacer14 3 года назад +4

      Wow! That is horrible. Locals going to protest?

    • @IndigenousRuuchuuUchinaa
      @IndigenousRuuchuuUchinaa 3 года назад

      @@ApriliaRacer14 Yes as always. But Japan wants the bases in Ryukyu islands that's why native Ryukyuans have been suffering for a long time.

  • @livinghealthy7135
    @livinghealthy7135 3 года назад +11

    Dangerous stuff, thank you for sharing this video.

  • @andydutton455
    @andydutton455 3 года назад +3

    That's cool that you have a solution to pfas.

  • @york2175
    @york2175 3 года назад +8

    After the video just watched y'all about to blow up lol

    • @JodBronson
      @JodBronson 3 года назад +1

      Nah, just blowing up slowly... It will take some+time, LMFAO.

  • @sielorstout1213
    @sielorstout1213 Год назад +1

    Does a Berkey water filter successfully remove the pfas?

    • @jreshorts737
      @jreshorts737 Год назад +2

      Prob not, I’d recommend buying a countertop reverse osmosis system

    • @dr123hall
      @dr123hall 10 месяцев назад

      @@jreshorts737Absolutely not for long term high volume needs but PFAS is removed by activated carbon filters, as in a Berkey.

  • @deniset3164
    @deniset3164 Год назад

    Can Chlorella be used,? And how

  • @henrich2183
    @henrich2183 2 года назад

    As always - how much is dangerous? What dose is dangerous and what dose do people get?

  • @Outdoorlife11
    @Outdoorlife11 3 года назад +2

    Oh yeah are they trying to remove flouride too?

    • @NancyBeegle
      @NancyBeegle 3 года назад +2

      🤣 Fat chance. Imo, they knew these were extremely dangerous before putting them in everything... even the toxic waste they call fluoride that's still added to us water and banned in other countries.

    • @JodBronson
      @JodBronson 3 года назад

      OMG, in my town/city. Since the pan-dammit... They upgrade to even more chemicals in the water, like 2X. I got so sick from it. Now when I touch it... OMG, my hands and skin itches like crazy.

  • @enriquemercedes9519
    @enriquemercedes9519 3 года назад

    Can my Brita water filter remove the PFAS from my water?

    • @JodBronson
      @JodBronson 3 года назад

      Your Brita Filter DOES NOT remove anything! It added "carbon" to MASK the taste and NOTHING ELSE !!!

    • @Razzle_Dazzle9
      @Razzle_Dazzle9 2 года назад +1

      No

    • @Uknown76
      @Uknown76 2 года назад +1

      No unfortunately

  • @mikegardens
    @mikegardens 3 года назад +5

    LA Water System is not even testing for PFAS and the EPA has not set any standards or enforcing detection and removal.

    • @JaneDoe-tm2ex
      @JaneDoe-tm2ex 3 года назад +1

      Ugh :(

    • @RobertAnema
      @RobertAnema 2 года назад

      www.epa.gov/pfas "On June 15, 2022, EPA released four drinking water health advisories for PFAS. EPA also announced that it is inviting states and territories to apply for $1 billion in Bipartisan Infrastructure Law grant funding to address PFAS and other emerging contaminants in drinking water."

  • @JodBronson
    @JodBronson 3 года назад

    OMG, in my town/city. Since the pan-dammit... They upgrade to even more chemicals in the water, like 2X. I got so sick from it. Now when I touch it... OMG, my hands and skin itches like crazy.

    • @hillslide
      @hillslide 2 года назад

      Where did you find out about the extra chemicals

    • @JodBronson
      @JodBronson 2 года назад +1

      @@hillslide - Check your City or call City Hall and they will give you all the info. Each year, they send a flyer to everyone in town to tell us about our water and what is in it.

  • @J-3-3-R-379
    @J-3-3-R-379 Год назад

    hydroviv?

  • @lizzyfrizzy4969
    @lizzyfrizzy4969 Год назад +2

    Where are the thousands of tons of contaminated GAC going every year?

  • @robthetinmang1455
    @robthetinmang1455 Год назад +1

    For firefighting where volatile organic compounds (VOC), like gasoline, are involved, it is still the best option. PFAS foam has a high surface tension that blocks the vapors from VOCs from evaporating. It's the vapors that burn, not the liquid. However, at the same time firefighters are preparing to deploy foam, they are also supposed to be taking measures to protect storm drains, waterways, and soil that might be contaminated. Sadly, many volunteer fire depts don't use it enough that containment steps are forgotten bc they get excited about using something new. In the East Palestine derailment, the local depts were quick to deploy foam, which woukd have been the right move if the chemicals were in puddles in the ground. However, they were pressurized, which breaks the surface tension of the foam and makes it ineffective. Also, with that big of a scene and waterways so close, the ideal situation before even using water, except to coll cars that weren't breached, woukd be to set up dyking barriers by the streams and call in heavy digging machinery and build dirt berms to better protect the forest and waterways from contamination. The berms can be built from a distance to prevent thermal injury from the fires and earth berms are easier to remove if contaminated than cleaning waterways.

  • @danieljurca2113
    @danieljurca2113 Год назад +1

    I use detergent to clean my water

  • @2A1C1downURnext
    @2A1C1downURnext 3 года назад +13

    Distillation. No flourine compounds, chlorine, clarifiers, pharmaseuticals, insoluble minerals. Done.

    • @dineshv7692
      @dineshv7692 3 года назад +7

      Bringing water to its boiling point is the oldest and most effective way since it eliminates most microbes , but it cannot remove chemical toxins or impurities.

    • @thatguyoverthere8355
      @thatguyoverthere8355 3 года назад +1

      Done? Ummm...not so simple in this corporate world

    • @myradotson757
      @myradotson757 3 года назад +8

      Distillation is not adequate if toxic chemicals have the same boiling point as water.

    • @markcampbell7577
      @markcampbell7577 3 года назад +2

      They are also the primary causes of heart disease arteriosclerosis and fibrillation.. The plaque is a halogenated carbon or vinyl polymer in your heart.

    • @Filip-ko8wl
      @Filip-ko8wl 3 года назад

      Well that may work to some extend, but the energy cost would be far to high. PFAS are a treat at a few parts per billion so you would need to vaporise a billion liters just to remove a few kg of PFAS. Even if you can recycle the heat to some extend the maintanace of any such oparation would be a real pain in the ass since it would need to be a batch system to remove the kristallised parts regularly

  • @wobblybobengland
    @wobblybobengland 2 года назад +1

    Corporations rip through the US like a toxic Godzilla

  • @tarmbruster1
    @tarmbruster1 2 года назад +2

    Landfills are loaded with PFAS.

  • @SolarizeYourLife
    @SolarizeYourLife 3 года назад +6

    Teflon makes you a stronger/tougher person...

  • @HiKimiko
    @HiKimiko 3 года назад +6

    the audio is too low... the drip sound is ridiculously loud while the talking is soft.

  • @user-hn1sw4cf7x
    @user-hn1sw4cf7x Год назад +1

    Dupont, Nemours, Dow, Suez, BASF. They did this on purpose.

  • @0.0.0.0.1
    @0.0.0.0.1 3 года назад

    4:18 I thought this was shut down for not filtering to spec.

  • @letsbereal8653
    @letsbereal8653 2 года назад

    Why is financial cons even a factor of being chemically healthy

  • @fuzzybojangles1141
    @fuzzybojangles1141 3 года назад +11

    People think its funny I only drink distilled water

    • @timway6839
      @timway6839 3 года назад +8

      You might be missing out on some minerals

    • @SurrogateActivities
      @SurrogateActivities 3 года назад +5

      arguably worse than having some pfas in your body

    • @vrty21
      @vrty21 3 года назад +1

      Unless you make your own, the plastic bottle contain micro plastics.

    • @tolu9838
      @tolu9838 3 года назад +1

      @@timway6839 get a multivitamin lol

    • @ryannagel2512
      @ryannagel2512 3 года назад +13

      I don’t understand why people think distilled water is bad for you lmao.. it’s the purest water smh.. you can get mineral from food haha

  • @enriquemercedes9519
    @enriquemercedes9519 3 года назад +1

    PFAS? Say that 10 times fast

    • @JodBronson
      @JodBronson 3 года назад +1

      I did and I ended with PEE-SLOW. LMFAO

  • @SolarizeYourLife
    @SolarizeYourLife 3 года назад

    Water plants wants to charge us an arm and leg for thier water...

  • @weareoursolution1977
    @weareoursolution1977 3 года назад +1

    Just terrible