RJF was a genius at selecting the best defensive move that thwarts his opponents idea and offensive move that posed vexing problems. All in one move...what jaw-dropping skill : efficient and deadly.
Fischer is just terrifying. Even when a game seems evenly matched he always finds a little advantage way ahead, like he has fewer pawn islands or an isolated passed pawn or a position that can force victory despite being down material somehow. It's kind of unsettling.
Schwindsichtiga der Echte yes. It’s called playing correctly, nothing fancy like rooks and queens being sacrificed, something you can only ever do with weaker opponents. Fischer wanted to play correctly, the best moves in the position, what the engines of the future would play.
Nothing fancy? First off, have you seen engine lines? Second, no queens being sacrificed? Have you seen Fischer's games? Fancy is exactly the word to describe that style of play. And third, "it's called playing correctly", like Petrosian or Spassky didn't play correctly and didn't influence modern chess? I'm not impressed by your comment, it sounds just arrogant.
Fancy, as amateur players would describe it. All they want is to check their opponent, sacrifice everything and mate on move 17. It doesn't work that way in real chess. That's why Fischer's play is not as interesting to them as Tal's, for example. It is fancy to me, is all I'm saying.
Petrossian certainly played correctly, that's why he was called a boring and passive player. I'm not disagreeing with you, actually. I'm responding to what I see as amateur players' obsession with attack, attack, attack. That's why Tal is so popular, everyone wants to see Tal games, where he plays a weaker grandmaster and wins with some crazy sacrifice. Then he plays a real player and he can't do that and it's over. I like Fischer a lot, and I'm certainly for giving Petrosian his due, he was a WC for 6 years. I have a lot of respect for him, the fact that he broke Fischer's winning streak says a lot.
There is this concept of "truth" in chess; you can win by playing weak moves, you can win by playing risky moves that your opponent doesn't know how to counter on the board. Remember that quote, "You must take your opponent into a dark forest...". Well, some players want to know what the "truth" of the position is, after the game is finished. They want to know whether they were truly better or worse, regardless who won. Fischer was like that, as was Kasparov. Karpov is said to have cared little about it. That's what I meant about playing correctly. Playing the best move in the position, even if you knew your opponent would fall for a cheap trick, that wasn't the best move.
Dear Agadmator, I have watched all of these videos and yet here I am rewatching the whole saga. Just wanted to thank you for being Agadmator. It's the best way to put it. Just thanks for being what you are!
What's even more impressive about Fischer, is he does the same thing in blitz chess like when he played in Herceq Novi, as it was considered one of the strongest blitz tournament ever held even though it was an unofficial blitz tournament including Tal himself played. Tal said the same thing you said about Fischer's blitz in Herceq Novi; how everything is simple, follows a single pattern, logical, an without any spectacular effects; he makes his moves quickly an practically an without error, throughout the tournament, I think he did not lose a whole set of pieces in this way. Tal told the Soviets that those games from Herceq would make for great study for the Ficher/Spassky match. Plus, Ficher only spent 2 an half minutes for all 22 games in which Ficher won 19/22. It's insane that Ficher could think that logically so fast as well as move the pieces about so fast like that an just dominate in only 2 an half minutes. And many month's later, 7 or 8 I think, he played a strong blitz tournament in Manhattan with a 21½/22 score, and with those two tournaments, he had a score of 40½/3½ combined; and they say to which I haven't checked thoroughly myself, is that Fischer showed from memory all 1,000 moves that were played in those 22 games from Herceg; words just don't describe how spectacular Fischer was. Anyway, I had to edit this as I thought I mixed up two different articles of Tal about Fischer's Herceg Novi games and I totally blundered those words.
This is the best chess game headline I have seen in my life. Nice work, Antonio. Creative, clear, funny,and engaging... The best chess channel by far. Cheers from Colombia!
Hi agadmator! I'm usually one of the many viewers who don't comment the video but today was kind of a special day for me and I wanted to share it. My girlfriend left me (nothing fancy she was just not in love anymore) and I know it can sound stupid but, as seeing your video has become quite an addiction to me, I really felt better by going back to my confort addict zone and keep trying to improve my vast knwoledge. I mean, thinking about something else than her, keep seeing beauty in the art of chess, putting in perspective the importance of what is happening to me... It's simple but it helps! More usefull than my psychologist aha! Your work is awesome, you made me get back to chess with the ambition to get better and I truly thank you!
Many thanks for the good work. I agree with the bloke below who suggested educational videos. My rating has gone up by 100 since I started watching you, and I'm keen to learn more.
#suggestion I would love to see you cover the game between David Paravyan vs Saveliy Golubov from the Korchnoi Memorial 2018. Maybe one of the best over the board games of the year and definitely a brilliancy. Please consider covering this game!
I love you Antonio. ...along with all chess players...any threats against your channel would be futile...whats the idea here...well they have just cemented their stupidity with an attack on your show...thank you for sharing your life and intriguing most excellent knowledge in the sport world of chess....you are our New face of Chess commentators in the World and look forward to seeing more and more videos....
Thanks for your videos, I watch them daily. A suggestion - PLEASE don't spoil the game result in the title itself (the result of this game was clear from the video title). When your video title is ambiguous, the games are much more interesting. I specially enjoyed the Fischer vs Taimanov match. Thanks!
Answer: About 130 yards Question: If you’re going to strike with the iron while it’s still hot, what is the average golf ball driving distance with a game 8 iron?
A good memory can help to win a game chess and also equally capable of summoning the ghost of the previous failures in the present game. Not even the strongest of nerves stand a chance. When pressure increases, heat increases too. Everybody has a melting point.
Even if Fischer would face Karpov to defend his title, still the reigning world champion would emerge the victor, why, simply because the said champion himself is a genius. Not a single world chess grandmaster could match Fischer's invincibility to shut out back to back wins two best gm's.
Hi there, #suggestion #agadmator. I think it will be nice if you could make some teaching videos from time to time. This will be very appreciated and it will also bring more people to chess as all the fans want to use some chess theory in theire games. You also could make some videos documentaries more oriented on the chess life style, which is completely different from a player to another and from a period to another. The point of this post is to tell you that you can bluit around what you already raised. You could also post some videos around your own life style, kind of chess TV. show, better than the kardashians I guess. So here some ideas for your projet. Let the crowd decide.
I've often thought that nobody played the endgame like Capablanca, but Fischer certainly came close! I would call Bobby the most complete player of all time: mastery of opening, middle-game tactics, endgame precision--he had it all.
What's crazy about this analysis is that the two players probably analyzed dozens of lines, not just the half dozen we see here. Watching Ivanchuk talk about his game made me realize how godlike GM's are in terms of analysis.
It's amazing that so many gms feel under the weather after playing Fischer for a few games. Larsen, Petrosian and then Sparky were just ' Not themselves" after their matches. As Fischer said " I've been playing people not at their best " for 15 years. His chess genius came at a price of almost complete insanity and being a total American outcast. What a pity he couldn't even live in his own country.
Fischer couldn't live in the United States because the US government set out to get him. Pressure was put on then CIA Director George H. W. Bush who threatened ten years imprisonment without a trial. Who applied such pressure? That is difficult to say but Henry Kissinger probably had a hand in it. Before judging Fischer too harshly and definitely before playing amateur psychologist, please read Gardar Sverrisson's marvelous Bobby Fischer The Final Years: A Personal Memoir. Gardar Sverrisson was Bobby's best friend in Iceland and even made sure that Bobby's last wishes were carried out via a clandestine Christian burial . The book is more about Fischer the Man than Fischer the Chess Genius. As such, it is the clearest window into the heart and soul one of the 20th century's true American heroes.
Hi Agadmator, thanks for another great video. I think you may have the wrong picture at the beginning though. Fischer is shown playing as white whereas in the video he is playing as black.
Agadmator.. do you play on ICC? You now have so many followers, give some of us a chance to play vs you (and get whipped! lol). Your videos are like you saying out loud what the players are thinking; very fascinating insights. Thank you for giving me something enjoyable to look forward to every day.
Another great video, but I don't think the picture is from this match. There's other chess boards in the background, and a lot of people on the stage. USSR vs the World, maybe?
I agree with our brilliant host of these games that Petrosian didn't play very well against Fischer in this match. However, the question arises: why didn't he play so well? Did Fischer 'psych' Petrosian out & throw him off balance? I believe Tal had the ability to intimidate his opponents & it wouldn't surprise me if Fischer did too. I saw Fischer on a TV talk show right after this match was played & Fischer remarked that by the end of the match Petrosian was looking pretty 'mousey.' Fischer was clearly into crushing the ego of his opponents, making them squirm & all that and I just wonder if Fischer's powerful persona may have gotten to Petrosian & had an effect on his playing ability because I thought initially Petrosian played really well in this match. Otherwise, why did Petrosian play so poorly in this match? Anyone have any thoughts?
I think you're right. Around this time, late 60's early 70's, Fischer had an aura similar to Alekhine's in the early 30's , Tal's late 50's and Kasparov's late 80's...Essentially he was a pawn up against most opponents before moving a piece. Petrosian was just worn down in this match and towards the end his play was unrecognizable .But this was down to Fischer as you say.
#suggestion Agadmator i'm really enjoying the series so far, i was thinking if you could start a Garry Kasparov serie, i'm sure a lot of people would really enjoy watching it
Dear Agadmator: you are the very best chess site available in the whole world right now. Congratulations!!! I am a humble 1800 chess player and English is my second language. Is it possible that I may suggest your analyses may be a bit shorter so you may allow our lesser capacity minds to catch up with your narrative? Many times, when you go back to the original position after your wonderful extrapolation of what could be done, I feel totally lost and I loose momentum. Just a few 3 or 4 moves could do it. I am sorry for even asking you this. I am sure that many player aficionados may disagree with what I am saying... in that case, don't pay attention to my words, but if you think that my comments make sense I would sincerely appreciate you may help us - fans in the process of acquiring the English language - to follow you in an easier way. Nevertheless, I find your channel exciting and the very best available to all of us chess lovers. Please, continue your work!! We enjoy it and we need it. The world needs it!!
#suggestion @agadmator can you cover this game, from utut adianto one of the strongest Indonesian grandmasters. I think you have enough subscribers from Indonesia, and also I think you have never covered an Indonesian chess grandmaster ... I think the beauty of this game is worthy of your coverage... Alexander Baburin (2530) vs Utut Adianto (2510) Liechtenstein (1993), LIE Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation (D25)
nice game bobby so after this series would you go to the champion match booby vs spassky not sure the correct spelling for spessky , any way you know what i mean
Capablanca Carlsen Tal Alekhine Kasparov had More beautiful games than Morphy and Fischer! Fischer beat the weakest chess World champion Boris Spassky only 17 wins 10 losses! Capablanca would beat Spassky easily 8 wins 6 draws zero losses! Carlsen would beat Spassky easily 6 wins 6 draws zero losses! The highest tournament elo rating score is Fabiano Caruana 8,5/10 StLouis elo 3080! Karpov 11/13 Linares 1994 elo score 3040! Alekhine in San Remo 1930 elo score 3040! Fischer his best tournament score only 2990! Karpov has won over 160 super grand Master tournaments! Fischer won zero only inter zonals 1962 1970! Fischer was Second in Santa Monica 1966 behind blunder maker Spassky! Fischer did not won Havanna 1965! Stockfish 16 would beat Fischer 999-1 easily! Fischer vs Geller in 1967 Fischer moved 17:exf7? 17:Rook f6! Wins easily! Fischer vs Stein famous Bishop f5! But earlier Fischer moved 26:Knight f3?? 26:Knight f7! Or 26:a3! Wins easily! Fischer vs Larsen game one in 1971 Fischer played Bishop f3??? Bishop d6! wins easily! Fischer vs Spassky in 1966 olympiad Fischer played Queen a6??? Rook e3! Wins easily!
@RaineriHakkarainen Weakest? Boris had the entire Russian country on his side helping him against lonely Fischer. You're probably the only person that says these things about him. Even Magnus states that's he's top 3 and among his most favorite player.
I was wondering about Petrosian's move at 8:18, why move the rook to a useless square instead of attacking the queen on C3. So I downloaded stockfish to see what I missed and apparently at depth 63, stockfish 11 says that is the best move. I will die happy now. But if you are here only to enjoy the show, B2 was played. This proves that I am better than Petrosian in this exact position, too bad I cannot play chess at all.
“Tigran isn’t interested in exploring all these fancy lines, so instead he resigns”... understated agadmator gold right there.
The way you say "Hello Everyone!" brings me joy
RJF was a genius at selecting the best defensive move that thwarts his opponents idea and offensive move that posed vexing problems. All in one move...what jaw-dropping skill : efficient and deadly.
Fischer is just terrifying. Even when a game seems evenly matched he always finds a little advantage way ahead, like he has fewer pawn islands or an isolated passed pawn or a position that can force victory despite being down material somehow. It's kind of unsettling.
Schwindsichtiga der Echte yes. It’s called playing correctly, nothing fancy like rooks and queens being sacrificed, something you can only ever do with weaker opponents. Fischer wanted to play correctly, the best moves in the position, what the engines of the future would play.
Nothing fancy? First off, have you seen engine lines? Second, no queens being sacrificed? Have you seen Fischer's games? Fancy is exactly the word to describe that style of play. And third, "it's called playing correctly", like Petrosian or Spassky didn't play correctly and didn't influence modern chess? I'm not impressed by your comment, it sounds just arrogant.
Fancy, as amateur players would describe it. All they want is to check their opponent, sacrifice everything and mate on move 17. It doesn't work that way in real chess. That's why Fischer's play is not as interesting to them as Tal's, for example.
It is fancy to me, is all I'm saying.
Petrossian certainly played correctly, that's why he was called a boring and passive player. I'm not disagreeing with you, actually. I'm responding to what I see as amateur players' obsession with attack, attack, attack. That's why Tal is so popular, everyone wants to see Tal games, where he plays a weaker grandmaster and wins with some crazy sacrifice. Then he plays a real player and he can't do that and it's over.
I like Fischer a lot, and I'm certainly for giving Petrosian his due, he was a WC for 6 years. I have a lot of respect for him, the fact that he broke Fischer's winning streak says a lot.
There is this concept of "truth" in chess; you can win by playing weak moves, you can win by playing risky moves that your opponent doesn't know how to counter on the board. Remember that quote, "You must take your opponent into a dark forest...".
Well, some players want to know what the "truth" of the position is, after the game is finished. They want to know whether they were truly better or worse, regardless who won.
Fischer was like that, as was Kasparov. Karpov is said to have cared little about it.
That's what I meant about playing correctly. Playing the best move in the position, even if you knew your opponent would fall for a cheap trick, that wasn't the best move.
Dear Agadmator, I have watched all of these videos and yet here I am rewatching the whole saga. Just wanted to thank you for being Agadmator. It's the best way to put it. Just thanks for being what you are!
Me too! I love coming back to his videos!
Fischer's games always seem so incredibly logical, leaving one to ask, "How did his opponents not see what he saw?"
There's simply nothing they can do about it 😂 (kidding)
that’s the thing about chess, the worst part is the other person‘s always doing some shit
What's even more impressive about Fischer, is he does the same thing in blitz chess like when he played in Herceq Novi, as it was considered one of the strongest blitz tournament ever held even though it was an unofficial blitz tournament including Tal himself played. Tal said the same thing you said about Fischer's blitz in Herceq Novi; how everything is simple, follows a single pattern, logical, an without any spectacular effects; he makes his moves quickly an practically an without error, throughout the tournament, I think he did not lose a whole set of pieces in this way. Tal told the Soviets that those games from Herceq would make for great study for the Ficher/Spassky match. Plus, Ficher only spent 2 an half minutes for all 22 games in which Ficher won 19/22. It's insane that Ficher could think that logically so fast as well as move the pieces about so fast like that an just dominate in only 2 an half minutes. And many month's later, 7 or 8 I think, he played a strong blitz tournament in Manhattan with a 21½/22 score, and with those two tournaments, he had a score of 40½/3½ combined; and they say to which I haven't checked thoroughly myself, is that Fischer showed from memory all 1,000 moves that were played in those 22 games from Herceg; words just don't describe how spectacular Fischer was. Anyway, I had to edit this as I thought I mixed up two different articles of Tal about Fischer's Herceg Novi games and I totally blundered those words.
Fischer lived and breathed chess. He was 100% all in when it came to being the best.
@@arminiushermann09 180 IQ
only petrosian would still smile for the camera while being down 3 pts
He smiling for the camera while Fischer looks at the chess board. Wonder why he own:)
This is the best chess game headline I have seen in my life. Nice work, Antonio. Creative, clear, funny,and engaging... The best chess channel by far.
Cheers from Colombia!
25.5 - 2.5
Let the crushing continue.
It was about this time that Petrosian caught the infamous 'Fischer Fever'.
Thank you for reviving me of my love for this wonderful game. You're commentary is absolutely magnificent. Good luck with the channels future
This series has been better than any reality show on TV.
Agamator, you are the man when it comes to chess. Your site is educational, informative, witty and highly entertaining! Keep it up!
I like this guy a lot. He does a great job explaining why moves are played and why others are much weaker than they appear. 👍
Hi agadmator!
I'm usually one of the many viewers who don't comment the video but today was kind of a special day for me and I wanted to share it. My girlfriend left me (nothing fancy she was just not in love anymore) and I know it can sound stupid but, as seeing your video has become quite an addiction to me, I really felt better by going back to my confort addict zone and keep trying to improve my vast knwoledge. I mean, thinking about something else than her, keep seeing beauty in the art of chess, putting in perspective the importance of what is happening to me... It's simple but it helps!
More usefull than my psychologist aha!
Your work is awesome, you made me get back to chess with the ambition to get better and I truly thank you!
I think those series u are making are so good
I just found myself eager to open RUclips to look if agadmator just uploaded.
Many thanks for the good work. I agree with the bloke below who suggested educational videos. My rating has gone up by 100 since I started watching you, and I'm keen to learn more.
At 9:43, just seeing that black can checkmate is so much more than I am capable of. Shhhhh, masters at work.
I'm finally done watching the Fischer-Petrosian Match!
I wonder why it took me so long...
But great content and explanation by Agadmator!
#suggestion I would love to see you cover the game between David Paravyan vs Saveliy Golubov from the Korchnoi Memorial 2018. Maybe one of the best over the board games of the year and definitely a brilliancy. Please consider covering this game!
DivineKEATZ I think Suren has covered that game . It is magnificent
@@akshatshrivastava4524 Also Kingscrusher covered that game .
You are the best at calling chess. Thank you for your content.
As always great work agadmator 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
I love you Antonio. ...along with all chess players...any threats against your channel would be futile...whats the idea here...well they have just cemented their stupidity with an attack on your show...thank you for sharing your life and intriguing most excellent knowledge in the sport world of chess....you are our New face of Chess commentators in the World and look forward to seeing more and more videos....
Can't stop watching your videos even though I'm awful at chess.
"...trying to make the back rank a little bit more.. less vulnerable..." Tell me why this English makes more sense than English class lol
I think this is my favorite game in the series.
Oh i'm early lemme make a joke....
Naka promoting to a knight
So weird, i was just thinking about that game
I do that against the ai and they leave the knight alone so many times haha, they always capture if its queen!
Thanks for your videos, I watch them daily. A suggestion - PLEASE don't spoil the game result in the title itself (the result of this game was clear from the video title). When your video title is ambiguous, the games are much more interesting. I specially enjoyed the Fischer vs Taimanov match. Thanks!
Answer: About 130 yards
Question: If you’re going to strike with the iron while it’s still hot, what is the average golf ball driving distance with a game 8 iron?
The bobby theory says about 6/1
Idiots?
These captions are great.
Tigran after losing game six, was never the same. First five games were fantastic.
- explains why Petrosian didn't capture because to take is a mistake
- next move: Fischer captures knight
Waiting for you video since hours.
Love your videos, you've made chess fun for me again.
A good memory can help to win a game chess and also equally capable of summoning the ghost of the previous failures in the present game. Not even the strongest of nerves stand a chance. When pressure increases, heat increases too. Everybody has a melting point.
Welcome back Mr Fishcer
Even if Fischer would face Karpov to defend his title, still the reigning world champion would emerge the victor, why, simply because the said champion himself is a genius. Not a single world chess grandmaster could match Fischer's invincibility to shut out back to back wins two best gm's.
Hi there, #suggestion #agadmator. I think it will be nice if you could make some teaching videos from time to time. This will be very appreciated and it will also bring more people to chess as all the fans want to use some chess theory in theire games. You also could make some videos documentaries more oriented on the chess life style, which is completely different from a player to another and from a period to another. The point of this post is to tell you that you can bluit around what you already raised. You could also post some videos around your own life style, kind of chess TV. show, better than the kardashians I guess. So here some ideas for your projet. Let the crowd decide.
Good idea
Good idea, perhaps how to assess mid-game positions before entering an end games
Thumbs up on the teaching part
you're becoming a star you should start selling agadmator t-shirts with a picture of your dog lol
Morphy was the greatest genius of all. He’s the one that ushered in the modern era of Chess.
That’s B. Fisher in his prime right there... his end games are excellent.
I've often thought that nobody played the endgame like Capablanca, but Fischer certainly came close! I would call Bobby the most complete player of all time: mastery of opening, middle-game tactics, endgame precision--he had it all.
What's crazy about this analysis is that the two players probably analyzed dozens of lines, not just the half dozen we see here. Watching Ivanchuk talk about his game made me realize how godlike GM's are in terms of analysis.
Wow, Bobby Fischer took advantage off the first move
It's amazing that so many gms feel under the weather after playing Fischer for a few games. Larsen, Petrosian and then Sparky were just ' Not themselves" after their matches. As Fischer said " I've been playing people not at their best " for 15 years. His chess genius came at a price of almost complete insanity and being a total American outcast. What a pity he couldn't even live in his own country.
Fischer couldn't live in the United States because the US government set out to get him. Pressure was put on then CIA Director George H. W. Bush who threatened ten years imprisonment without a trial. Who applied such pressure? That is difficult to say but Henry Kissinger probably had a hand in it. Before judging Fischer too harshly and definitely before playing amateur psychologist, please read Gardar Sverrisson's marvelous Bobby Fischer The Final Years: A Personal Memoir. Gardar Sverrisson was Bobby's best friend in Iceland and even made sure that Bobby's last wishes were carried out via a clandestine Christian burial . The book is more about Fischer the Man than Fischer the Chess Genius. As such, it is the clearest window into the heart and soul one of the 20th century's true American heroes.
Great coverage, kudos
I'm impressed by how black methodically took full advantage of the opportunities presented to him. White effectively beat himself.
Hi Agadmator, thanks for another great video. I think you may have the wrong picture at the beginning though. Fischer is shown playing as white whereas in the video he is playing as black.
Agadmator.. do you play on ICC? You now have so many followers, give some of us a chance to play vs you (and get whipped! lol). Your videos are like you saying out loud what the players are thinking; very fascinating insights. Thank you for giving me something enjoyable to look forward to every day.
Who in the world dislikes the video before watching half of it?
Haters... haters everywhere :)
SLCC maybe 😂
We like the video b4 watching half of it :D
CNN Fake News
we like the moment we see bobby fischer
Another great video, but I don't think the picture is from this match. There's other chess boards in the background, and a lot of people on the stage. USSR vs the World, maybe?
Strike while the iron is hot is such a nice statement
Sad to see Petrosian lose again. Was hoping that he would turn this around.
I agree with our brilliant host of these games that Petrosian didn't play very well against Fischer in this match. However, the question arises: why didn't he play so well? Did Fischer 'psych' Petrosian out & throw him off balance? I believe Tal had the ability to intimidate his opponents & it wouldn't surprise me if Fischer did too. I saw Fischer on a TV talk show right after this match was played & Fischer remarked that by the end of the match Petrosian was looking pretty 'mousey.' Fischer was clearly into crushing the ego of his opponents, making them squirm & all that and I just wonder if Fischer's powerful persona may have gotten to Petrosian & had an effect on his playing ability because I thought initially Petrosian played really well in this match. Otherwise, why did Petrosian play so poorly in this match? Anyone have any thoughts?
I think you're right. Around this time, late 60's early 70's, Fischer had an aura similar to Alekhine's in the early 30's , Tal's late 50's and Kasparov's late 80's...Essentially he was a pawn up against most opponents before moving a piece. Petrosian was just worn down in this match and towards the end his play was unrecognizable .But this was down to Fischer as you say.
It was really different; in fact both players went bizarre or crazy...good stuff it will be, if from U
Fischer is a machine! Seems Spassky was his strongest opponent.
Fischer went straight boss on Tigran.
Engine mode
Lol Yup😂
Fischer was another Pride and Sorrow of Chess.
7:52..omg ❤️
Petrosian has such a nice smile its got me wishing that he wins the series ;/
Thnq 4 the video Sir.....
#suggestion
Agadmator i'm really enjoying the series so far, i was thinking if you could start a Garry Kasparov serie, i'm sure a lot of people would really enjoy watching it
great video again, keep it up !
Wonderful game! 🔱
Dear Agadmator: you are the very best chess site available in the whole world right now. Congratulations!!! I am a humble 1800 chess player and English is my second language. Is it possible that I may suggest your analyses may be a bit shorter so you may allow our lesser capacity minds to catch up with your narrative? Many times, when you go back to the original position after your wonderful extrapolation of what could be done, I feel totally lost and I loose momentum. Just a few 3 or 4 moves could do it. I am sorry for even asking you this. I am sure that many player aficionados may disagree with what I am saying... in that case, don't pay attention to my words, but if you think that my comments make sense I would sincerely appreciate you may help us - fans in the process of acquiring the English language - to follow you in an easier way. Nevertheless, I find your channel exciting and the very best available to all of us chess lovers. Please, continue your work!! We enjoy it and we need it. The world needs it!!
#Suggestion: Polugayevsky vs Tal (37th USSR Championship/Moscow,1969) The statement "Increase your vast knowledge of chess" are words to live by!
Exchange with advantage only,leson from the game besides good endgame with major pieces,thanks.
#suggestion @agadmator can you cover this game, from utut adianto one of the strongest Indonesian grandmasters. I think you have enough subscribers from Indonesia, and also I think you have never covered an Indonesian chess grandmaster ... I think the beauty of this game is worthy of your coverage...
Alexander Baburin (2530) vs Utut Adianto (2510)
Liechtenstein (1993), LIE Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation (D25)
Stunning game:)
1:06 Agadmator I believe your vast knowledge is incorrect, Tigran has the black pieces in this photo!
"Trying to make the back rank a bit more less vulnerable.." haha
I think that's correct. A bit less vulnerable is one ambiguous bit while a bit more specifies it's a positive bit.
We need a break from fischer series,due 256k subs milestone make some TAL game #suggestion Tal vs white rook youth club 1970?😇😁😇😁
Man, look at that formation at 8:27. Don’t see that every day.
You should really cover my games,and how I haven't been able to break though the 800 rating barrier!
right, i almost managed a draw against stockfish 9 at WC mode
1:58 agad winks at us
Fischer kicks ass
wrong picture?
I want a bit more less pawns
"Tigran Petrosian"
7:58
In the photo Petrosian has black pieces. I think the photo is from one of the previous game of this series, not this one..
Great! Again...
Tigran is a defense specialist but playing against Fischer forced him into attack mode where he wasn't comfortable.
So petrosian is not interested in exploring all these check mating options 😂
#suggestion Please show a game of Stockfish in the Computer Chess Chapionship, vs Crafty or maybe vs Houdini
Robert James Fischer won the game!
#suggest maghsoodlo vs sindarov played in world junior championship round 7
Can you show the game between Kasparov and Kramnik probably played in 90'. It was a blitz game with Kasparov making a terrible blunder.
Can you do some more videos on Vishwanath Anand games.!!
Pls show the Anand vs Ding match
I wish Agad would say "Push em baby" Instead of "of course you have to push your passed pawn"
like yasser and the boys ..that would be awesome
agadmator, can you reccomend some chess books to start with?
He did in his qna vid
Chess Books for Beginners - The Basics - An introduction, 10 volumes.
8:20 a horizontal Alekhine's gun
Come to think of it,Petrosian was the Boris Gelfand of his time
Is the picture in the video same as yesterday? Why is Petrosian playing with black in the picture? Just wondering.
I think the photo is from USSR v ROW 1970.
One thing should be known is that Fischer had the flu in the period when he lost and then had three draws against Petrosian.
Steel is strongest, so say we all!!
nice game bobby so after this series would you go to the champion match booby vs spassky not sure the correct spelling for spessky , any way you know what i mean
fischer favorite move is NF6?
Morphy and Fischer, the prides and sorrows of chess. Coincidence both were American and considered two of the goats.
Capablanca Carlsen Tal Alekhine Kasparov had More beautiful games than Morphy and Fischer! Fischer beat the weakest chess World champion Boris Spassky only 17 wins 10 losses! Capablanca would beat Spassky easily 8 wins 6 draws zero losses! Carlsen would beat Spassky easily 6 wins 6 draws zero losses! The highest tournament elo rating score is Fabiano Caruana 8,5/10 StLouis elo 3080! Karpov 11/13 Linares 1994 elo score 3040! Alekhine in San Remo 1930 elo score 3040! Fischer his best tournament score only 2990! Karpov has won over 160 super grand Master tournaments! Fischer won zero only inter zonals 1962 1970! Fischer was Second in Santa Monica 1966 behind blunder maker Spassky! Fischer did not won Havanna 1965! Stockfish 16 would beat Fischer 999-1 easily! Fischer vs Geller in 1967 Fischer moved 17:exf7? 17:Rook f6! Wins easily! Fischer vs Stein famous Bishop f5! But earlier Fischer moved 26:Knight f3?? 26:Knight f7! Or 26:a3! Wins easily! Fischer vs Larsen game one in 1971 Fischer played Bishop f3??? Bishop d6! wins easily! Fischer vs Spassky in 1966 olympiad Fischer played Queen a6??? Rook e3! Wins easily!
@RaineriHakkarainen Weakest? Boris had the entire Russian country on his side helping him against lonely Fischer. You're probably the only person that says these things about him. Even Magnus states that's he's top 3 and among his most favorite player.
I was wondering about Petrosian's move at 8:18, why move the rook to a useless square instead of attacking the queen on C3. So I downloaded stockfish to see what I missed and apparently at depth 63, stockfish 11 says that is the best move. I will die happy now. But if you are here only to enjoy the show, B2 was played. This proves that I am better than Petrosian in this exact position, too bad I cannot play chess at all.
As far as I can tell the move is on the same "level" as Rook to B1 so I guess Petrosian is not an idiot either
6:46 why not to take the pawn?
After Re2 you loose the bishop