"England Should Apologise To Australia!" Aussie Journalist SLAMS English Cricket

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 3,7 тыс.

  • @Grief_Jerky
    @Grief_Jerky Год назад +427

    “It's within the rules of the game and that's how it is,” - Jonny Bairstow 2014

    • @acerimmeh
      @acerimmeh Год назад +21

      Did he say that when he sneakily stumped Patel in a County match?

    • @MattyGalvin
      @MattyGalvin Год назад +27

      ​@@acerimmehhis exact words made on tv when interviewed about it 😂 all this old footage coming back to haunt him

    • @arlencarroll1964
      @arlencarroll1964 Год назад +6

      Hahaha yeah,maybe that's why old Jonny boy has been conspicuously quiet on this matter hey haha 😄

    • @Bellas1717
      @Bellas1717 Год назад +2

      @@acerimmeh Yes, he actually stood holding the ball waiting for Patel's foot to clear the crease. Bit of a difference.

    • @jamesjones-z4u
      @jamesjones-z4u Год назад +2

      @@Bellas1717 Stumping players on the edge of their crease overbalancing has always been part of the game. Australians bringing up these false equivalencies, pointing out times Bairstow attempted regulation stumpings to justify their far from regulation ‘stumping’ of a player going for a between overs chat is disingenuous at best.

  • @petermcculloch4933
    @petermcculloch4933 Год назад +839

    Piers, the batsman doesn't rule over, the umpire does.

    • @michelleclifford7122
      @michelleclifford7122 Год назад +13

      Exactly !

    • @Boolama27
      @Boolama27 Год назад +10

      Yes 100%

    • @addamr2052
      @addamr2052 Год назад +16

      One law for the Poms and another law for the others .

    • @niftynev4779
      @niftynev4779 Год назад +2

      Meghan will be glad this has happened, she now gets a break from Morgan's big mouth. 🦘

    • @concernedcitizen5943
      @concernedcitizen5943 Год назад +9

      The English are so used to making the rules they forgot who their cricket rules delegated authority to on the cricket field.

  • @pablodelfuego6567
    @pablodelfuego6567 Год назад +143

    So Bairstow is calling when the over is over? Well we don’t need umpires anymore do we.

  • @jjeherrera
    @jjeherrera Год назад +611

    I like Piers, but Peter Lalor is right here. The players must play by the rules, and this was fair play, regardless of the fans' feelings.

    • @suzilouden5964
      @suzilouden5964 Год назад

      Pierce is a whinging Pom. And he's Trump apologist. With his history, how dare Morgan talk about integrity......🤮

    • @jjeherrera
      @jjeherrera Год назад +2

      @@johnnichol9412 Corrected! Mind the lapsus! 😅

    • @Woodbug-b7t
      @Woodbug-b7t Год назад +2

      ...or Piers's feelings.

    • @todddixon1005
      @todddixon1005 Год назад +5

      When the ball is in the gloves and both batsmen are in their crease it’s a dead ball, you don’t then make it live again I’ve umpires and I would have laughed at the fielding side if they’d tried this.

    • @raymckee2450
      @raymckee2450 Год назад +14

      I have supported Piers on just about everything argument he puts up, but this interview and a couple of others on this Bairstow stuff up, has me disliking him. I wouldn't be surprised if he has never played cricket at any level, and is just quoting what he has heard. He refuses to listen to the facts and avoids the words of previous English. captains. This just proves, that he is as bad as the average ignorant English members of the Marylebone Cricket Club.

  • @martinmason5008
    @martinmason5008 Год назад +494

    I'm an Englishman, furiously passionate about The Ashes and fair play. I wholeheartedly agree with Peter Lalor. We can't be pointing fingers with a ton of whatabouts out there. I even agree about England apologising, in my view because we've prioritized Bazball over The Ashes, and show respect for the folks who have travelled so far for the contest. We should thank Australia for a timely slap around the face whilst we have a chance to do something about getting a win on the board in Leeds. Sorry to hear about Steve Smith's mum. It's not on that this has happened to her. Finally, the comment about the Englsh writing the laws: Ouch. That hurt, and good one. Proud Pom, no whinger though.

    • @libertyordeaf
      @libertyordeaf Год назад +21

      Australian fan and appreciate your level-headedness. Personally, I don't like these gotcha kinds of wickets - Mankads and sneaky keeper underarms. I'd rather see batsmen dismissed by high quality bowling or fielding. But clearly these dismissals are within the law and they are occasionally needed as as a reminder to batsmen that (a) the creases are there for a reason, and (b) they don't determine whether the ball is live or dead. I can guarantee Bairstow will never take that for granted and get out that way again, and it'll be a wake-up call for a few others too. As for the 'spirit of cricket', it's outlined in the preamble to the Laws of Cricket and says nothing about captains being so generous as to hand dozy opposition batsmen a second chance.

    • @goodyeoman4534
      @goodyeoman4534 Год назад +3

      Fawning submissive.

    • @Doghead.89
      @Doghead.89 Год назад +6

      Dude.
      He was batting in his crease.
      He marked his crease.
      Both umpires where on the move.
      One umpire unclipping the bowlers cap.
      Oh but the ball wasn’t dead?
      It was sneaky and crooked.
      Was JB gaining an advantage?
      NO.
      A batsman batting 3 yards out for his crease would be gaining an advantage.
      A batsman running down the wicket to a spinner would be gaining an advantage.
      The batsman at the non strikers end backing up to early before the bowler has released the ball would be gaining an advantage.
      JB wasn’t the whole thing stinks, same old Aussies always cheating theyve got previous this lot, a disgusting bunch.

    • @Lucaf_2008
      @Lucaf_2008 Год назад

      @@Doghead.89 do you have a life to get on with?

    • @jt1559
      @jt1559 Год назад +21

      ​@@Doghead.89and yet when England has done it in the past, no one in England said anything.

  • @nickhand8054
    @nickhand8054 Год назад +301

    Actually, as an Australian, my feelings are this: if an Australian batsman got himself out in the same fashion, I reckon I'd be feeling anger towards the batsman for his negligence. I really don't think I'd be blaming the fielding side.

    • @jamesjones-z4u
      @jamesjones-z4u Год назад +12

      Considering the massive Australian over-reaction to the Starc non-catch the day before (crowding the umpires, blaming Duckett for not walking) I highly doubt that your compatriots would feel the same way! Also, Australians were wandering out of their crease throughout both of their innings without positive confirmation the ball was dead, which I guess just means that they all must be negligent also, or was Bairstow only negligent because he did it against Australia, a team known to be unsporting?

    • @paulpurves484
      @paulpurves484 Год назад +3

      Of course you’d say that.

    • @sansul88
      @sansul88 Год назад +4

      Not a chance mate... This will be on the headlines, just as its been portraited in the English newspapers.. They will definitely talk about lack of spirit for the game and they will also be called cheats, BY EVERYBODY IN AUSTRALIA MATE... Lets be honest, nobody talks highly of The Australian spirits for the game.. I can only think of Adam Gilchrist when it comes to Australian spirit of the game. I mean who would thought of sandpaper and how long did that happen before its been caught? How many test matches and odis been played that way? Guess nobody will know that now but yeh.. Australians would react the same way if the tables were turned.

    • @Reneesillycar74
      @Reneesillycar74 Год назад

      Yep!

    • @TheAbabab77
      @TheAbabab77 Год назад

      ​@@jamesjones-z4u😂😂😂😂 you're wanker of a captain has tried it multiple times champ. Get over it your team just aren't good enough.

  • @AntzWar
    @AntzWar Год назад +417

    As an Englishman, Piers you are an embarrassment and get over it, the ball was not dead and it is not a dead ball when the batsman scrapes his boot or studs to mark the end of the delivery, its up to the umpire, Aussies played within the rules and so why should Cummins have to withdraw the appeal, it is not cheating so no tarnished reputations, MCC members should definitely apologise to the Australians

    • @felawes
      @felawes Год назад +26

      Writing as a MCC member and lifelong cricketer, Piers you would be well served to read the rules of cricket before spouting a stream of inaccurate consciousness.

    • @todddixon1005
      @todddixon1005 Год назад +1

      I’m Australian and I think we are the pathetic ones, to try and justify this shows what and immature and desperate people we are.

    • @alani3992
      @alani3992 Год назад +1

      Nobody believes that the batter was trying to steal a run.
      Why try to somehow get a wicket that you haven't earned.
      Even in Mankading, the accusation is that the batter is trying to get an advantage, which is not the case here.

    • @geralddinkleson4201
      @geralddinkleson4201 Год назад +8

      @@todddixon1005 my brother bairstowe attempted the exact same dismissal

    • @pimp4984
      @pimp4984 Год назад

      Are you an English Cricket fan, though? It doesn't sound like you are.

  • @filips4972
    @filips4972 Год назад +309

    What i've noticed about Piers is, when he is confident that he is absolutely right, he lets his guest speak without interrupting. As soon as the guest starts building a valid argument, he just jumps in and interrupts them every three seconds. Pathetic, really. It's easy to be a bully when you are in command of the mute button.
    The spirit of the game is to applaud your opponent, even when you'd want to tear his guts out and feed them to the dogs. It is in the spirit of the game to accept the umpires' decision, even when you are 100% certain that they are wrong. Like the day before, re Starc's (non) catch... It is not in the spirit of the game to announce that you won't be having a beer with your opponent any time soon. As if they'd be crying to miss that opportunity (it's most likely they'd be saying DILLIGAF.)

    • @micksharonlittle1907
      @micksharonlittle1907 Год назад +11

      i totally agree. If you want to debate someone then you should allow them to respond freely. Unfortunately Piers Morgan is the epitome of a whinging Pom. As an Aussie I watched Stokes batting and had a terrible feeling that this bloke is going to pull the rabbit from its hiding place again. However as an Australian I also appreciated his display of trying to win the game. This is how England should be.

    • @robby1816
      @robby1816 Год назад +4

      Yup, the umpire is always right, even when they're wrong.

    • @SvendBosanvovski
      @SvendBosanvovski Год назад

      Pretty crook when they have to go back to the Trevor Chappell issue, and that was against the Kiwis. The laws have changed since that. And Sandgate, after Smith scored on of the best centuries in recent history?

    • @wolfe59
      @wolfe59 Год назад +5

      Has anyone read his continual tirade on Twitter I blocked him in the end he was whinging for 36 hours 😂😂

    • @michaelbishop9157
      @michaelbishop9157 Год назад +7

      Piers is a horrible person

  • @GeoffGordon-e1b
    @GeoffGordon-e1b Год назад +107

    When Australia bowled the underarm ball, they took away New Zealand's agency over that moment. In this case, Johnny Bairstow still had agency in that moment and chose not to use it. It was a sad way to lose his wicket, but ultimately, his own fault.

    • @TheIkaraCult
      @TheIkaraCult Год назад +3

      sadly this obvious fact needs to be explained to people like Morgan and others who sympathise with him.

    • @eyecontrol4900
      @eyecontrol4900 7 месяцев назад

      The thing I find most sickening is the 'lost opportunity' and 'haven't moved past Sandpapergate' drivel, which Piers Morgan pontificated at the time. Just because Australia did the wrong thing 5 years ago, and egregiously so, doesn't mean that from then on - perhaps forever - they must play to some moral standard higher than everyone else, including their opponents in highest stakes competitive matches. Australia and the relevant players were punished at the time - rightly, and the team has cleaned up its act so that, one thinks, it will never happen again. That's enough, without Australia having to then play on some kind handicap system for 5 years or eternity thereafter.

  • @nafizimtiaz5680
    @nafizimtiaz5680 Год назад +492

    Watching Piers embarrass himself is an amazing thing to see 😂

  • @karthiksatyam
    @karthiksatyam Год назад +52

    Piers Morgan should let the guest talk. You let Geoff Boycott rant for minutes without interruption. But now you keep talking over peter for every two words he says. Yet you lecture about spirit of cricket. How about the spirit of being a good host and let the guest speak his mind? As an Indian and a cricket fan, I fully support the Aussies. Way to go!

    • @TheMusingGreg
      @TheMusingGreg Год назад +2

      Well said mate. I agree with Piers on most things; I generally disagree with him here although I didn't like the look of the dismissal as Bairstow wasn't trying to get an advantage. But even on causes I agree with Piers on, I wish he would stop interrupting the guest as I'd like to hear and understand their view so I can make my own judgement. That should be the job of the media, to allow both sides of an argument to be aired so the public can make informed decisions.

    • @shaunstrang6658
      @shaunstrang6658 Год назад

      agree 100%

  • @nathanhowland196
    @nathanhowland196 Год назад +129

    I am Englishman, was a wickie for 27 years, and in every form of cricket I played, catching a batsman walking out out of his crease was a 'given' part of the role, actively coached, and I did it about a dozen times. Not one batsman complained it was unsportsman-like conduct, no opposition player ever pulled me to one side about it, and every batsman I caught out was gutted they were mugged for not paying attention. The ball was still live, the over was still live, and the wicketkeeper was aware enough to be proactive and switched on to seize the opportunity. If the ball had missed and gone for 4 overthrows none of you idiots would be whining!? Piers needs to shut-up!!

    • @justinspagnolo2931
      @justinspagnolo2931 Год назад +3

      Thank you dude. Restored my faith in the English!!!.. now please go and spread the word .. Ben stokes nearly pulled off a miracle and everyone's focused on a legitimate piece of cricket play and likening it to sandpaper-gate and cheating.. I'm actually really disappointed in your entire country ATM and I'm honestly looking at this as objectively as possible..

    • @colin.mall3tt
      @colin.mall3tt Год назад +3

      Well said but many suspect that this is not about the 'incident' itself, its about drawing attention away from the failures of 'bazball'.

    • @michaellincoln3739
      @michaellincoln3739 Год назад

      Very true. But the answer to this conundrum is that the umpires should be empowered (and educated) to over-rule the laws of cricket on certain rare occasions to 'protect the integrity of the sport'. As an Aussie, I believe Bairstow should have been given a reprieve by the umpires. It's the umpires who have failed not Cummins or Carey who did the right thing. Gutless umpiring has caused this controversy.

    • @justinspagnolo2931
      @justinspagnolo2931 Год назад

      @@michaellincoln3739 i actually agree with u here because u can't blame Carey or Cummins and it's a shit way to get someone out or to get out.. I was thinking the exact same way, the umpires have all the angles and all the cameras so it's all up to them.. then I realized that giving him a reprieve here will set a precedent where umpires are now having to decide if a batsmen is being careless or made a mistake.. the rules are the way they are so umpires don't have to make these decisions.. therefore I revert back to it being entirely bairstow's fault and if england want to blame anyone it should be him. After all he's a keeper and all keepers know the rules regarding the crease and gameplay etc.. especially considering he made a similar play in the previous innings and he's got a history of using the same rules to his advantage and then quoting 'its I'm the rules and it's part of the game'..

    • @BenDover-tb8ek
      @BenDover-tb8ek Год назад +1

      And you naturally did this at the end of an over.

  • @Stu-Bo
    @Stu-Bo Год назад +132

    One key thing Piers doesn't understand, is that the ball was being returned BEFORE Bairstow scraped his foot. The ball was returned in one swift motion, and had Bairstow looked back to see this would never have occurred.

    • @davidbrear8642
      @davidbrear8642 Год назад +4

      I completely agree with that.
      That said, if you watch the video carefully, the only valid excuse for Bairstow's failure to look back, is the fact that he looked towards the bowler's end, where the umpire definitely began to react as though the over has ended. However, the umpire hadn't yet called 'over.'
      From the umpire's initial movement (where he started to look down), I don't think he had yet spotted that Carey had not stopped playing. A full view of Carey would be blocked by Bairstow, and/or (like Bairstow) the umpire made a wrong assumption, because he wasn't paying sufficient attention.

    • @jamesjones-z4u
      @jamesjones-z4u Год назад +4

      @@davidbrear8642 Batsmen on both sides were doing exactly what Bairstow did throughout the game, wandering out of their creases at the end of overs without looking back or positive confirmation the ball was dead. If that’s careless then it’s something many batsmen are guilty of. It hadn’t been a problem before that, though, because before that nobody would have attempted a stumping, however Australia were enraged up by the Starc decision the day before! The most careless thing Bairstow did was thinking he could be complacent around the angered Australians!
      It’s true that Carey threw the ball immediately, though. So it’s not necessarily that Carey was being unsporting, as much as Cummins was to not withdraw the appeal.

    • @davidbrear8642
      @davidbrear8642 Год назад +4

      @@jamesjones-z4u Yes, you make very good points. This incident was the result of many combined factors not least revenge. The entire England team should have been on their toes after the Starc decision.
      I previously pointed out on another thread that amongst international players it seems to have become an unspoken 'gentlemen's' agreement that, when the keeper is standing back to pace and the ball is cleanly pouched, if the batter is safe in his crease, both sides have invariably stopped playing and umpires have taken the same approach. Perhaps the laws of cricket will now be modified to deem the ball as automatically dead in these particular circumstances?
      Currently in these particular circumstances in test matches, during overs (and even at the end of overs) when batsmen leave their crease for a chat or to do a bit of gardening, it's often unclear whether the ball is dead or still in play.

    • @count23all
      @count23all Год назад

      Doesn't understand or doesn't care, because he is an outrage factory and needs to be angry about _something_ when Megan and Harry aren't in the news.

    • @johnbriggs5379
      @johnbriggs5379 Год назад +1

      @@davidbrear8642 Why change the rules? when all you need to do is pay attention to the current rules.

  • @chrisjames5188
    @chrisjames5188 Год назад +296

    As an England fan Australia did nothing wrong they took advantage of bairstows mistake. Since when does the batsman decide the over is finished.

    • @itsfrma6500
      @itsfrma6500 Год назад

      Absolutely spot on. Bairstow was an idiot!

    • @maldini3184
      @maldini3184 Год назад +13

      Exactly. Australia is the only team i would never cheer for in cricket. But that is out. Carey did nothing wrong

    • @NemoNiemand497
      @NemoNiemand497 Год назад +6

      As a South African I love nothing more than seeing England and Australia going at each other. Having Pierce Morgan getting his own medicine is so much fun! But honestly, this "run out" is not cricket, it's bad sportsmanship. Nuff said.

    • @itsfrma6500
      @itsfrma6500 Год назад +8

      @@NemoNiemand497 You see as an England supporter I do still disagree! It really wasn't hard to just stay in another second or two. I feel like people use the likes of MS Dhoni as a reference to how "good sportsmanship" should be displayed, but even that circumstance in my opinion was totally different to this! Bairstow (WHO MIGHT I ADD IS A WICKET KEEPER?! 😆) Doesn't even look back to see if Carey caught it or fumbled or whatever... (I appreciate it isn't village cricket) but it doesn't take a lot to just turn a head and see / check everything is ok!

    • @thatsbollox
      @thatsbollox Год назад +9

      @@NemoNiemand497 Its not even a run out. He was stumped. Nothing weird, and quite common even off a seamer. They saw their hopes and dreams dashed thats all.

  • @aperfectlycromulentusername
    @aperfectlycromulentusername Год назад +59

    Peter Lalor is one of the best cricket writers in the world, his opinion commands respect.

    • @loganratley6704
      @loganratley6704 Год назад

      HAHAHA sounds like an uneducated whinger to me.

  • @SA-nv5tc
    @SA-nv5tc Год назад +101

    Having now read what “the spirit of cricket” is as written in the laws of the game, it turns out that the only team and country that has not behaved in the “spirit of cricket” is ENGLAND!

    • @willforbes6373
      @willforbes6373 Год назад +3

      Well said. Glad you said Laws, not Rules.

    • @falaramal3979
      @falaramal3979 Год назад +4

      Yea what happened to respecting the decision of the umpire?

    • @SA-nv5tc
      @SA-nv5tc Год назад +1

      @@falaramal3979 that ended at the same time as saying “crease leave”! 🤣🤣🤣🙊

    • @flamingfrancis
      @flamingfrancis Год назад

      For the record. The Spirit of the game is NOT written into the actual Laws. It appears as a preamble to those Laws. Such as a preface would in a book.

  • @tonyblades2800
    @tonyblades2800 Год назад +81

    Peter Lalor is such a great journalist, streets ahead of Piers, with his infinitely non existent cricket wisdom.

    • @longjohn5322
      @longjohn5322 Год назад

      Morgan can call himself whatever he likes but I think he’s a celebrity.

    • @clarke1319
      @clarke1319 Год назад

      Maybe ...don't know the person however what we are watching here is not journalism is it. On the face of it it's two guys with conflicting views about an incident in a cricket match. It could just as easily be you and I having a discussion in a pub. It's not journalism to have an opinion.

    • @francisjohnston8014
      @francisjohnston8014 Год назад

      Ironically Piers is streets behind.

  • @daniellehirschausen8908
    @daniellehirschausen8908 Год назад +34

    Thank you to all the Englishman and ladies ,who agree about the aussies not cheating ,and thank you for being fair !😊

  • @saqibakbar2026
    @saqibakbar2026 Год назад +404

    "We should have won" is not an argument. Losing and then highlighting a single incident just displays a loser mentality.

    • @knight2425
      @knight2425 Год назад +19

      Yeah they should have won lol, I love the way they say that considering that dismissal is what set Stokes off. How do they know if the Aussies had withdrawn the appeal Stokes would have played like he did? Typical poms that think they know the rules but don’t know this one

    • @brettallan7417
      @brettallan7417 Год назад +17

      @@knight2425 The poms wrote the rules and still don't know them. 🤣🤣🤣

    • @knight2425
      @knight2425 Год назад +7

      @@brettallan7417 Some of them know the rules but don’t want to abide by them when it’s to their detriment

    • @Johnnysabboy
      @Johnnysabboy Год назад +2

      They couldn’t even win on day one…

    • @jamesjones-z4u
      @jamesjones-z4u Год назад +4

      Ridiculous. Had England done to Australia what Australia did to them there’s a reasonably high chance they would have walked off the pitch and flown home. You only had to see their ridiculous response to the Starc grounded catch the day before, where they surrounded the umpire in an attempt to intimidate him.

  • @E1sun
    @E1sun Год назад +34

    3 things: 1. Baistow should have checked the over was over . 2. The ball was released by the keeper before he left the crease. 3. Bairstow has a bad habit of leaving his crease early constantly and the Ozzies noticed. That is his and the English coaching staffs fault for not resolving .

  • @lsimmo78
    @lsimmo78 Год назад +14

    Piers is conflating 'Sandpaper Gate' with what happened to Jonny Bairstow. The two are not linked. Jonny was lazy and not paying attention.

  • @bendavidjohn
    @bendavidjohn Год назад +53

    I’d have done exactly the same thing if I were Australia tbh. Australia aren’t making these same silly mistakes, so why are England? This is professional cricket at the highest level.
    Silly mistakes should be punished at this level - fair game.

    • @anishjagannathan1576
      @anishjagannathan1576 Год назад +2

      Mitch Starc made the silly mistake of letting the ball scrape against the ground for a catch, and as a result, it was ruled not-out.

    • @mickm6309
      @mickm6309 Год назад +5

      Bairstow would have done the exact same thing and Stokes would never have called the batsman back.

    • @flch95
      @flch95 Год назад +1

      @@mickm6309lol 100% believe that lol.

  • @johnavery3941
    @johnavery3941 Год назад +52

    As a Cricket Umpire myself he is out, the Umpire did not call Over. Even schoolboys/girls know are taught to stay in their crease until Over is called. It was his own fault. The spirit of the game does not come into it. The ball was not dead.

  • @trevorcornwa-zy8sq
    @trevorcornwa-zy8sq Год назад +24

    "Both umpires had moved to move away" shows vision where the standing umpire doesn't even take a step out of position.

    • @williamwelling2210
      @williamwelling2210 Год назад

      i spotted that too, at most the standing umpire only looked down and Bairstow didn't even look at him before he started off.

    • @davidgraham8299
      @davidgraham8299 Год назад

      You watch it from the various angles available, NEITHER umpire had moved.

  • @swanny1236
    @swanny1236 Год назад +175

    Love how piers invites an Aussie on then doesn’t let them speak 😂

    • @robertcockerell3640
      @robertcockerell3640 Год назад +2

      Exactly. We see and hear too much of him on Australian TV.

    • @goodyeoman4534
      @goodyeoman4534 Год назад

      Best way.

    • @MastersOfTheHeart
      @MastersOfTheHeart Год назад +8

      exactly, he just loves the sound if his own voice and his arguments are very thin indeed.
      love these aussies.
      cheers from Melbourne.

    • @geoffwhite5782
      @geoffwhite5782 Год назад +5

      poms are bad looses

    • @MultiDwang
      @MultiDwang Год назад +2

      So true.

  • @billymorris8764
    @billymorris8764 Год назад +197

    As a English fan, Australia did nothing wrong . Schoolboy error blown out of proportion.

    • @johnnysoccer1983
      @johnnysoccer1983 Год назад

      If Bairstow was out of his crease at any point from the start of the bowlers run up to the ball entering the keeper's gloves, I would agree. But the fact that he tried to deliberately time it for the moment he left his crease after all of that was said and done, AND did so on the last ball of an over, makes it entirely unacceptable..... And I'm and Aussie.

    • @jakkaxn5513
      @jakkaxn5513 Год назад +8

      @@johnnysoccer1983it was an instant throw. It was a schoolboy error

    • @uskumarmate
      @uskumarmate Год назад +1

      ​@@johnnysoccer1983well said mate

    • @uskumarmate
      @uskumarmate Год назад +1

      ​​@@jakkaxn5513he instant throw, was, based on what Cummins said, related to what Carey had observed Bairstow doing earlier. Let's not pretend Carey was just being instinctive.. It was pre planned

    • @johnnysoccer1983
      @johnnysoccer1983 Год назад

      @@jakkaxn5513 Choosing to go for an instant throw when the batter was never out of their crease in the hopes of timing it for when they leave AFTER they believe the ball dead and on the last ball of the over is a dog act to try and buy a wicket you couldn't get legitimately.

  • @nitlover8319
    @nitlover8319 Год назад +49

    Comparing it to the underarm incident is just taking stupidity to a different level 😂😂

    • @brianwilson49
      @brianwilson49 Год назад

      He was equating the Australian attitude to cricket not the laws of the game.

    • @BlakeLawler
      @BlakeLawler 11 месяцев назад +2

      @brianwilson49
      Remember the game with England and West Indies where the keeper waited the batter to slide his foot out of his crease and stumped him. Not to mention Bairstow tried the same f***ing thing in the same match so what does England know about the spirit of the game.

  • @jessemay4277
    @jessemay4277 Год назад +155

    "We probably would have been 2-0 up" has me dying hahahahahahah

    • @arunsrivatsa7155
      @arunsrivatsa7155 Год назад +2

      What a stupid thing to say by piers. There's no ifs and buts

    • @ChatPOPPAT
      @ChatPOPPAT Год назад

      As much as I dont like Piers, England were in position to win both test matches.. 55 runs needed with 2 wickets to go on the final day with new ball, England were clear favorites.. they dropped too many catches.. and again here, England were chasing down a total with 2 of their best on the crease,, JB run out is more controversial as it robbed us on a great finish, I dont say that England would have won but it would have been an exciting contest.. its clear that JB was not trying to take any advantage (which was the case with Labushane attempt which everyone is citing as he stood out of the crease to negate swing), he clearly marked the crease, his only fault was to assume it was the end of the over, you can call it silly or dumb, but its what every batsmen does... even the leg umpire started moving and facing umpire was taking out the cap to give it to the bowler.. what didnt set with me well that it was not a competitive dismissal and it sets up a wrong precedent to win at any costs.. well the bar has been set, Aussies have opened up the door.. now everything with the laws of cricket will happen, irrespective of the situation..

    • @flamingfrancis
      @flamingfrancis Год назад +1

      @@ChatPOPPAT One could equally state that the patriotic effort by Nathan Lyon to bat, as he did, and contribute to a 21 run partnership could have amounted to a game winning effort.

    • @mohidfarhan3527
      @mohidfarhan3527 Год назад +1

      Coulda shoulda woulda...the perfect response

    • @mikipiediaelburro7588
      @mikipiediaelburro7588 Год назад

      The sandpaper boys will always be remembered as the biggest crybabies in history😂😂😂

  • @Quincycle
    @Quincycle Год назад +80

    Part of the spirit of cricket is accepting the umpire's decision

  • @anubhav111196
    @anubhav111196 Год назад +28

    so piers doesn't like it when others don't let him talk but it's okay when he does it

    • @megahedgehog8649
      @megahedgehog8649 Год назад +1

      Conveniently cutting off Lalor trying to tell how Steve Smith's mum left the ground in tears. Well done England, you absolute twatwaffles.

  • @kha58
    @kha58 Год назад +57

    The English should learn the rules and accept the umpire decision as out. They are acting unsportsmanlike.

    • @pablojescobar3400
      @pablojescobar3400 Год назад +4

      They wrote them too

    • @madam9736
      @madam9736 Год назад

      You sound clueless son.

    • @Roy3.16
      @Roy3.16 Год назад +2

      @@pablojescobar3400 that's the most funniest thing that the writers of cricket rules and laws forget about them😆

  • @omieyadav638
    @omieyadav638 Год назад +45

    It was Bairstow's mistake. Carey took advantage of it.
    No need to create more mess.😅

    • @TylerDurden-cu6iz
      @TylerDurden-cu6iz Год назад

      It's not that simple. It involves the spirit of the game

  • @Jivvi
    @Jivvi Год назад +5

    Where did Piers get the crazy idea that the batsman can "mark the end of the over"? That's not a thing. It's never been a thing. The umpire says when the over ends. Johnny Bairstow had brain fart. Plain and simple. He'd do exactly the same thing, and _has_ done exactly the same thing to a batsman when he's the one fielding the ball.

  • @thatsbollox
    @thatsbollox Год назад +47

    You could not write this script if you tried. One simple fair stumping and the players meltdown, the coach goes full hypocrite, the crowd meltsdown, the commentators meltdown, and even the old toffs in the long room turn feral. All their hopes and dreams shattered and thrown to the wind.
    It is such classical English whinging. Historically embarassing. Historically funny as hell.

    • @M1dnightRunner
      @M1dnightRunner Год назад +4

      Smokescreen is what he said and how true haha.

    • @flch95
      @flch95 Год назад

      And it’s why I always cheer for whoever England is playing lol.

    • @Jack-r2v9b
      @Jack-r2v9b Год назад

      Yes if the ball missed and went to the boundary the poms wouldn't of run a couple more runs,you know this because of the spirit of cricket thing they claim for themselves

    • @dermotquinn
      @dermotquinn Год назад

      And the Aussies acted true to form. It's the expectation that the Aussies may be committed to fair play that makes the English look stupid.

    • @RolandEHay
      @RolandEHay Год назад

      We Australians have a inferiority complex and will do anything to win……I’m afraid!!!

  • @balancinggargoyle
    @balancinggargoyle Год назад +61

    Consider this hypothetical. Bairstow walks out of his crease in the exact same way, but instead stops and realizes that he's out of his crease while the ball is live. Bairstow immediately tries to get his bat behind the crease but just fails and is stumped. This would be considered by anyone to be an uncontroversial stumping. Bairstow's obliviousness can't dictate whether a dismissal is fair or not. Piers Morgan's argument is reductio ad absurdum.

    • @wrongtracksuit
      @wrongtracksuit Год назад

      @@Eric_Cartman______yet your own team did the same act in New Zealand. Hypocrite much? Loser.

    • @williamwelling2210
      @williamwelling2210 Год назад +2

      This is a brilliant , i wish someone in the media picks up on this. There is absolutely NO argument after this. WELL SAID

    • @0Fallacy
      @0Fallacy Год назад +3

      Good argument and I don't even follow cricket, well done

    • @billwhite9703
      @billwhite9703 Год назад +2

      "Consider this hypothetical. Bairstow walks out of his crease in the exact same way, but instead stops and realizes that he's out of his crease while the ball is live. Bairstow immediately tries to get his bat behind the crease but just fails and is stumped. This would be considered by anyone to be an uncontroversial stumping. Bairstow's obliviousness can't dictate whether a dismissal is fair or not. Piers Morgan's argument is reductio ad absurdum." That's a great comment.

    • @sanjicook08
      @sanjicook08 Год назад

      I don't think you know what reductio ad absurdum means

  • @iajanus
    @iajanus Год назад +19

    "if we hadn't lost the two games we would have won them"
    Top shelf analysis right here

  • @noumangujjar3159
    @noumangujjar3159 Год назад +23

    As a neutral person i believe it was right decision from umpire and cummins , however stokes and english captain should have given back 5 overthrow runs to NZ for the spirit of the game but they prefered WC.😏

  • @DaveWhoa
    @DaveWhoa Год назад +39

    Piers keeps mentioning sandpapergate but conveniently never mentions England using mints to shine the ball for an entire 2005 Ashes series. As for cheaters, who is the only person convicted of cheating in this Ashes series? England's Moeen Ali.

    • @Reneesillycar74
      @Reneesillycar74 Год назад +1

      Or that pocket full of dirt. How convenient!

    • @loganratley6704
      @loganratley6704 Год назад +1

      Or the player that got pinned this series

    • @oleggorky906
      @oleggorky906 Год назад

      No. Smith and Warner are convicted cheats if we’re going that way. Myopic Aussies. Never sinning but always sinned against.

    • @oleggorky906
      @oleggorky906 Год назад

      That’s odd, myopic Dave. I thought that the convicted cheats were Smith, Warner and young Bancroft, etc.
      The saliva from the Murray Mints was so game changing that you only complained after your boys got caught and the amino acids in the mints were obviously doing more damage than the abrasive sandpaper! There was also the case when Mark Waugh and Shane Warne got caught, taking money off of a bookie in Sri Lanka in 1994. CA didn’t give either of them a ban. Incredible to think that they covered it up for four years when you remember that Hanse Cronje forfeited his career for something similar.
      Then there was Warney getting sent home from the World Cup in 1999, after falling a drugs test. Did CA give him a ban? No, of course not. They’re in a different position to anyone else.
      Oh wait ... all of the above was the poms fault ... they forced those incidents onto poor old Australia!
      🤣👍🤣👍🤣👍

  • @maxsmum3561
    @maxsmum3561 Год назад +17

    I think the umpire calls ‘over’, not the player. The play was clearly not over, the keeper in one movement caught the ball and threw it at the stumps. Let us take every incident on its own merit, rather than trying to right wrongs from previous matches. Piers, I really think you have lost this round fella…

  • @patrickreade6119
    @patrickreade6119 Год назад +100

    Morgan, if England had took more catches or scored more runs they would have won both tests 😂😂😂😂 if smith hadn't dropped Stokes England would have been beaten more easily.

    • @SilentHotdog28
      @SilentHotdog28 Год назад +6

      If Australia had of won both tosses and had the favourable conditions instead of England, Australia would have won more comfortably.

    • @shannonnaicker4040
      @shannonnaicker4040 Год назад +14

      If englnd scored 700 and got aussies out for 50 they would have won. 2nil down and 3 more to lose. Come on aussies. From a South African 🇿🇦

    • @pleasantville4529
      @pleasantville4529 Год назад +17

      If my gran had wheels, she'd have been a bicycle.

    • @pleasantville4529
      @pleasantville4529 Год назад

      @@runawaypuppet Your kind of rewriting the joke there, but good on you.

    • @pleasantville4529
      @pleasantville4529 Год назад

      @@runawaypuppet I have to say, I'd be laughing like a mad man, if the tables were turned.

  • @lindsaybaker9480
    @lindsaybaker9480 Год назад +31

    Totally different incidents piers. Sandpaper was pure cheating but Bairstow has been caught out doing what he’s done to others.

    • @DaveWhoa
      @DaveWhoa Год назад +7

      it was also pure cheating when England used mints to shine the ball for the entire 2005 Ashes series

    • @melodychest9020
      @melodychest9020 Год назад +1

      Sandpaper happened cos the Aussies and the South Africans had bad blood outside the field as well, and both were at each others' throats. No excuse, but it was a very turbulent tour and emotions were out of control.

    • @user-hi5dd5qh9n
      @user-hi5dd5qh9n 8 месяцев назад

      Was a dark day for Aussie cricket. We love to win. But not at any cost. And not by cheating.

  • @paulmerson2023
    @paulmerson2023 Год назад +23

    Scraping a boot has no significance whatsoever. Piers lost the plot yet again

  • @vivekpokhriyal5303
    @vivekpokhriyal5303 Год назад +11

    Why would Johnny scrapping his boot mark the end of the over. Thats a decision that umpires make. Next time Warner nicks one to the slip, he should quickly scrap his boot before the catch is taken. Oh no over finished, ball dead, catch cannot be claimed. Absurd explanations from the English

    • @Roy3.16
      @Roy3.16 Год назад +2

      @vivekpokhriyal5303
      best comment lmfao🤣🤣😆😆

  • @Toomaletoopaletoostale
    @Toomaletoopaletoostale Год назад +4

    As soon as the game finished The headline in Australia on news corp online was “let the whinging commence”. The English didn’t let us down.

  • @samwheaton8591
    @samwheaton8591 Год назад +40

    Ah yes what a spirited debate where piers talked for about 7 and a half minutes and peter got about 30 seconds and then shoved off screen

    • @flamingfrancis
      @flamingfrancis Год назад +4

      That, my friend, is very typical of the way these "shock jocks" operate. They have their hand on the "kill" switch.

  • @steventhomson8387
    @steventhomson8387 Год назад +23

    Piers as is perfectly demonstrated here in this unilateral one-sided interview and by his lack of knowledge of cricket laws, is the perfect example of an unadulterated winging pom. Australia did nothing wrong and England are just plain sore losers and deserve to the series 5 - 0.

  • @ajmalmeeran6864
    @ajmalmeeran6864 Год назад +23

    We all saw England's spirit of the game during the world cup match against NZ 🤣

  • @steelydan133
    @steelydan133 Год назад +12

    Pierce I am neither English nor an Aussie, I am a cricket fan for over 48 years. Bairstow was so amateurish specially in such an important test and had a brain fade. The ball was in play, Carey threw it instinctively and caught him napping. Scraping of the boot was just in Bairstow's mind, that doesn't mean it is the end of the over. England is being a sore loser, they lost and they are taking the anger on one incident, smoke and mirrors buddy. And Pierce you can't be serious when you say if Bairstow was not out Eng would have won? What, Bairstow could have got out very next ball who knows and had Strokes hadn't played the innings of a lifetime it would been Eng losing by over 150 runs. Get some sleep

  • @thennavandakshinamoorthy7494
    @thennavandakshinamoorthy7494 Год назад +82

    According to the law England won the 2019 World Cup but to Save the spirit of cricket they should give it back to new zealand 😅😂

    • @tahmasp6624
      @tahmasp6624 Год назад +3

      😂 😂

    • @martinmason5008
      @martinmason5008 Год назад

      It crossed my mind at the time it could be shared.

    • @ADNAN-l5g
      @ADNAN-l5g Год назад +4

      Yeah according to spirit of game they should have given the trophy to new Zealand 😂

    • @margaretreid2153
      @margaretreid2153 Год назад +3

      By the way Piers, the disgusting underarm incident was in 1981,not 1991.

    • @johnfisher9692
      @johnfisher9692 Год назад

      @@margaretreid2153 And he got things wrong, Trevor Chappel argued with his brother over doing that, you can see he clearly didn't want to do it but in the end he did as his captain ordered him to do. In my view the only thing Trevor is guilty of is obeying his Captain.

  • @dhimantchovatia
    @dhimantchovatia Год назад +3

    Not once has Piers Morgan and the show's producers shown the angle from behind where both wicketkeeper and batsman are visible. If one sees that, it is clear as daylight, that Carey threw the ball much before Bairstow stepped out. Yes, he had been routinely stepping out immediately after the ball was bowled which the Aussies noticed. However, on that occasion, Carey did not see him step out. He just threw the ball, almost predicting that he may step out and he foolishly did the same. If the camera behind the keeper is shown, all the arguments die instantly. As for the Captain to withdraw the appeal, I think soon the English will ask to withdraw clean bowled while shouldering arms appeals because the batsman misjudged the ball. If you doze off you get out. This is TEST cricket for goodness sake.

  • @solreaver83
    @solreaver83 Год назад +10

    I saw footage today of Bairstow holding his gloves by the stumps for a few seconds before stumping someone doing the same thing. Our guy throws the ball immediately. In real time its about 2 seconds between the ball passing and the stumps coming off.

    • @murph7421
      @murph7421 Год назад +1

      Yes, and the English commentary team called it ‘very clever wicket keeping’. When asked about it after the match he said ‘it’s within the rules’.

  • @maldini3184
    @maldini3184 Год назад +19

    Lack of consentration from Bairstow. That is out all day long.

  • @AM19065
    @AM19065 Год назад +2

    Here after England's performance in WC...man its good to see Poms cry

  • @durbo7087
    @durbo7087 Год назад +29

    The only thing unsporting is Bairstow not walking once out. Cricket is a gentleman's game. He should have walked once he realised his mistake.

    • @jeffmackie547
      @jeffmackie547 Год назад

      Yes it's a gentleman's so why is it played by Aussie's

    • @Bellas1717
      @Bellas1717 Год назад

      @@jeffmackie547 England have proven that cricket is no longer played just by gentlemen. While we Australians have our fair share of gentlemen, the term "gentlemen's game" is anachronistic.

    • @CH-yp5by
      @CH-yp5by Год назад +2

      @@Bellas1717 Yep bodyline

    • @durbo7087
      @durbo7087 Год назад +1

      @@jeffmackie547 because England burnt the stumps after losing.

    • @jeffmackie547
      @jeffmackie547 Год назад

      @@Bellas1717 Oh there's nowt like a good laugh

  • @doctorsocrates4413
    @doctorsocrates4413 Год назад +32

    I do wish morgan would allow his guests to finish a sentence..I am very surprised anyone appears on that show.

    • @murph7421
      @murph7421 Год назад +2

      Well, like Piers said, no one else would.

    • @bc3397
      @bc3397 Год назад +3

      ​@@murph7421 Shocking that no-one would want to spend 7 and a half minutes of an 8 minute interview being bullied and berated by the host, then interrupted and muted whenever they get a chance to counter Piers' logical fallacies and whataboutism.

  • @Sippajo1
    @Sippajo1 Год назад +10

    The fact that piers for the most part can't tell that for the most part Peter is actually taking the piss out of him

  • @abyss7049
    @abyss7049 Год назад +33

    Give it a bloody rest Piers. Not every member of the public says it was wrong. Infact its more 50/50 with English folk, and given that, it just shows you it's not as bad as you think. Absolute waffle!

    • @knight2425
      @knight2425 Год назад

      Most of the past England players including captains have come out and supported Australia over this, it’s just the sore losers that are looking for a way to blame everyone else that are whinging at the moment

    • @shaunstrang6658
      @shaunstrang6658 Год назад

      couldnt agree more. A painful listen. Like so many of the other interviews he does.

  • @faniegreyling7949
    @faniegreyling7949 Год назад +16

    I am no Australian fan but they played the game within the rules. Piers and the poms should have another glass of vinegar and carry on with their lives.

  • @Leithvo
    @Leithvo Год назад +1

    Marcus Trescothick admitted to using peppermints to varnish the ball in the 2005 Ashes, which helped the ball swing and defeat the Aussies. They then got OBEs.
    Stuart Broad refused to walk in 2013 when he thick edged the ball to Michael Clarke at slip.
    Where is Piers' outrage. Hypocrite.
    If Starc's catch was given, England wouldn't even have come close this match. Piers has lose his mind.

  • @kelstra1997
    @kelstra1997 Год назад +70

    We have a few bad commentators here in Australia but thank God we don't have Piers Morgan.

    • @williamwelling2210
      @williamwelling2210 Год назад +5

      He doesn't really care , he just takes the opposite view to get air time

    • @Nofurtherquestions
      @Nofurtherquestions Год назад

      Thank god Australia is where the UK sent all its prisoners. Racist sexist backward hell hole

    • @nsh1772
      @nsh1772 Год назад

      Man I love Aussie commentary. Can you give me an example for a bad Australian commentator?

    • @patterdale4332
      @patterdale4332 Год назад

      And get here you are

    • @kelstra1997
      @kelstra1997 Год назад

      @@nsh1772 Most of the faces on Sky News would fit the bill as well as out famous Alan Jones

  • @tccandler
    @tccandler Год назад +4

    Absolutely 100%... and I am English.

  • @andrewmiller6051
    @andrewmiller6051 Год назад +5

    I’m Australian and I’m glad we won in this way, because now we get a hilarious show of England proving to the world what sore losers they are. Much more entertaining than a regular win 😂
    And if the roles were reversed, I would defend England. I’ve never believed in the Holy Spirit of Cricket that the Lords and Sirs made up but refuse to codify and even refuse to explain.

  • @taylorlibby7642
    @taylorlibby7642 Год назад +274

    As an American with absolutely no knowledge of cricket I find this whole tempest highly amusing.

    • @sirsillybilly
      @sirsillybilly Год назад +47

      Tune in for tomorrows next Test at Leeds….
      They’ll be more fireworks than July 4th

    • @simonjones4941
      @simonjones4941 Год назад +7

      I hear Dave Portnoy is our resident cricket expert across the pond 😅

    • @alexjason9086
      @alexjason9086 Год назад +5

      You like English defeat??

    • @salttea8926
      @salttea8926 Год назад +3

      In Cricket there are 3 formats in which 5 days cricket is the longest format and in which a player need more skill, more patience both physically and mentally... And other two one day and T20 are just for entertainment which last 7 hours and 2.5 hours respectively.... In 5 days cricket there are lot of minor things which can be sought out by both teams by themselves and they also have laws for it, as these minor things can be a loopholes in laws of cricket on which a team can take advantage... In this particular case Australian wicket keeper stumped (out) English cricketer by that minor thing on which English cricketer doesn't want to take any advantage and which costs England the match... And also Cricket is known as Gentlemen's game not because only mens play it (women's also play it) but all players are supposed to play it within spirit of game...

    • @mtsardar
      @mtsardar Год назад +9

      Cricket 🏏 is religion
      Matches between Australia 🇦🇺 - England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 , India 🇮🇳-pakistan are serious business . You get over billion people watching the game .

  • @alexclark3473
    @alexclark3473 Год назад +141

    Football equivalent of “play to the whistle”. Why is everyone complaining over a legal play?

    • @georgejung5429
      @georgejung5429 Год назад +7

      It’s actually nowhere near the same. 😂
      Cricket is a gentleman’s sport, it’s etiquette to play it as it should be played, but….the ozzys have just played dirty to get a W, and as an English man, I’d like to congratulate them on their success.
      England I hope would do the same thing and take advantage of a dirty play if it arose.

    • @ohmyfungus5810
      @ohmyfungus5810 Год назад +3

      Because it’s scummy and this Aussie team is most famous for sandpaper gate (they were found cheating)

    • @itsmeprasad1987
      @itsmeprasad1987 Год назад +2

      Cricket is a gentleman’s game

    • @trevaudio
      @trevaudio Год назад +4

      @@georgejung5429
      A gentleman’s sport 😂😂😂😂

    • @davidbrear8642
      @davidbrear8642 Год назад +3

      You are correct, according to the laws of cricket, the bowler's end umpire can only rule that the ball is dead when all the players on the field (the two batters and the fielders) come to regard it as dead. In other words, the ball becomes dead when both sides have stopped playing.
      Bairstow stopped playing, but Carey didn't, because he wasn't obliged to. The ball was, therefore, still in play.
      It has to be said that when a keeper takes a ball cleanly whilst standing back to pace in a test match, and the striking batsman is safely anchored in his crease, invariably everyone has stopped playing. It's almost as though this has become an unspoken agreement amongst international players, and this explains all the furor.
      Bairstow is a good bloke, but he was far too careless in the moment, particularly since this was an Ashes test where traditionally no holds are barred. He didn't even look round to see if Carey had pouched the ball, let alone to verify that he'd stopped playing. Bairstow must have heard the ball slam into his keeper's gloves so he signalled his intention to leave his crease not realising that the ball was on its way to the stumps
      Carey and Cummins are good blokes, but they have too much pressure on them to win.

  • @grennyfell97
    @grennyfell97 Год назад +5

    By not acknowledging that Carey had received the ball and was ready to consider it dead, Bairstow has shown a level of disrespect to his Australian counterpart.

  • @johnjames6620
    @johnjames6620 Год назад +83

    Surely, the umpire's decision (if it is indeed within the law) is final. Nothing more to be said.

    • @paramtageja6891
      @paramtageja6891 Год назад +3

      Cricket is a bit weird in this perspective because in various aspects for alot of people spirit of the game overrides the laws of the game in cases like Mankad etc. In footballing terms if a team puts the ball out for a throw in because there players is injured then the other team takes the throw in and scores. It's legal and in the rules of football but is it in the spirit of the game?

    • @johnjames6620
      @johnjames6620 Год назад +4

      @@paramtageja6891 Then a new set of rules should be drawn up so that everyone is aware of what the rules (spirit) of the game are and then there can be no disagreement on the matter and the umpires can enforce it.
      As an aside, is it also in the spirit of cricket for the bowling side to heckle the batsman (who is all alone on the field)? This happens all the time! So, to my mind, gamesmanship forms a big part of the "spirit of the game" as you referred to it.

    • @damonclarke3741
      @damonclarke3741 Год назад

      These umpires have been shit. Neither were looking at the crease when Bairstow had his stumps hit.

    • @aawe1
      @aawe1 Год назад +4

      @@paramtageja6891 But it _is_ the in the spirit of the game according to the English. And according Bairstow himself. See his comments about his own delayed stumping of Patel in 2014.

    • @aawe1
      @aawe1 Год назад +1

      @@paramtageja6891 Just rampant hypocrisy and bad sportsmanship from the English.

  • @eugenebong9414
    @eugenebong9414 Год назад +17

    The more times they run the Bairstow stumping, the more comical he looks!🤣

  • @alfalders3020
    @alfalders3020 Год назад +13

    This is the side of Piers that is so difficult to love.

    • @analogpixel
      @analogpixel Год назад +4

      There’s a side that’s easy to love?

    • @donuttttttt
      @donuttttttt Год назад +1

      @@analogpixellmao that’s funny but I do like the way he handles some things (note that I said some)

  • @henzelbitzi859
    @henzelbitzi859 Год назад +23

    Sandpaper gate has nothing to do with this! This just Piers and English way of trying to cry 😂😂

    • @DaveWhoa
      @DaveWhoa Год назад +4

      and he conveniently never mentioned England used mints to shine the ball for the entire 2005 Ashes series

    • @acerimmeh
      @acerimmeh Год назад +1

      @@DaveWhoa We would have flogged England that series had they not cheated. At the time, I had my suspicions they were cheating when watching that series, because they were getting the ball to revers swing within 20 overs.
      I find sandpaper gate disgusting as all Aussies do, but England have no moral high ground when it comes to cheating.

  • @michaellear6904
    @michaellear6904 Год назад +21

    The 'Spirit ' of cricket is behaviour that is best manifest when events go against you and you gracefully and manfully accept it.

    • @nickrad6966
      @nickrad6966 Год назад

      Like the under arm ball or the Mankad

    • @michaellear6904
      @michaellear6904 Год назад

      @nickrad6966 I have no problem with the Mankad but yeah, that underarm caper was shameful.

  • @adventurebushflyers985
    @adventurebushflyers985 Год назад +5

    "The Batsman doesn't get to decide when the over is done....That's the Umpires job."

  • @stevebird7265
    @stevebird7265 Год назад +10

    I 100% agree with the Aussie! Surely the over is not finished with until the play is ended. The wicket keeper did what he did in one continuous move, so play was not over and the batsman should have waited!

    • @jehanariyaratnam2874
      @jehanariyaratnam2874 Год назад

      It's over when the batsman scratches the crease with his foot once.....lol

    • @jimmyjames7667
      @jimmyjames7667 Год назад +1

      @@jehanariyaratnam2874 No, it's over when the batsman adjusts his cup. 🤪

  • @vicdantel2145
    @vicdantel2145 Год назад +42

    Saying “we should have won at Edgebaston” is like I should have won lotto even though I didn’t buy a ticket 😂

    • @XaviRonaldo0
      @XaviRonaldo0 Год назад +3

      They certainly shouldn't have lost. That stupid declaration made me laugh so hard

    • @Shandyboy8612
      @Shandyboy8612 Год назад

      We were the better side at Edgbaston throughout the 5 days and made stupid decisions and crucial times which made it too close and you won a game you didn’t deserve! Happens all the time in any sport. You deserved to win at Lords regardless of Bairstow but I just think you didn’t need to revert to those tactics

    • @XaviRonaldo0
      @XaviRonaldo0 Год назад

      @@Shandyboy8612 I was on your side til you had a bitch about the stumping

  • @jehanariyaratnam2874
    @jehanariyaratnam2874 Год назад +5

    It's funny how 90% of the comments completely disagree with Piers Morgan whether English, Australian or neutral

    • @billschild3371
      @billschild3371 Год назад +1

      Jehan. I see you everywhere and I await your input next on CFA Nation 😊.

  • @jasoncommon4795
    @jasoncommon4795 Год назад +9

    Was bowling bouncers to the injured Nathan Lyon in the " spirit of the game"

    • @PigeonPair
      @PigeonPair Год назад +1

      exactly, and was refusing him a runner also 'in the spirit of the game'? Hmmm

  • @harry_no.1
    @harry_no.1 Год назад +12

    Well said by the guest in a cool, calm and composed manner the way the MCC should have behaved

  • @goat2503
    @goat2503 Год назад +5

    I played club cricket and state underage cricket in Australia in the late 90s and early 2000s, and if I walked out of my crease before over was called and the ball was still alive, my coach would have ripped shreds through me 😂

  • @umairmudassar3152
    @umairmudassar3152 Год назад +85

    As a Pakistani fan of cricket
    I am enjoying this from day one 😂😂

    • @shounakchatterjee4461
      @shounakchatterjee4461 Год назад +10

      Me too...guess what I am an Indian🤓🤓

    • @miloblackmetalhate
      @miloblackmetalhate Год назад +4

      Bhaisaab as an Indian this is like Diwali came early. Maybe Bakrid ki khushi mei yeh tohfa diya hai goron ne 😂

    • @sven_86
      @sven_86 Год назад +1

      as indian fan, me too lol

    • @safebrad423
      @safebrad423 Год назад

      @@miloblackmetalhate fjijewroijfioejofijweoifjoi i can speak gibberish too djweojfimeovimv[oew c

  • @thatsbollox
    @thatsbollox Год назад +12

    Piers wants to introduce Woke Cricket. It starts with a few rule changes. it is now the batsman that tells the umpire when a ball is dead, and when the over is finished. Also, scratching the ground with your spriggs becomes the universal signal that you now cannot be dismissed. Another new rule is to let all batsmen get offered a second chance in case they feel poorly or offended about anything.
    My niece thinks that Bairstow fella looks exactly like a gingerbread man she made for chirstmas.

    • @Bellas1717
      @Bellas1717 Год назад

      I like your point, but woke actually means aware and accepting of a need to redress discrimination, particularly racial discrimination. It is unfortunate that you used the American bastardisation of the word, a tactic used to keep groups of people subjugated and to protect the power and position of old white men. (But then, isn’t that the composition of the group in the Long Room who showed us what the spirit of the gentleman's game should look like?)

    • @thatsbollox
      @thatsbollox Год назад

      @@Bellas1717 Grow up and tell the story to someone in your victim group that might care.

    • @Bellas1717
      @Bellas1717 Год назад

      @@thatsbollox it is actually quite grown up to be able to accept another point of view. It is quite the opposite to be dismissive and insulting. I belong to no group. I am not a victim. I simply bring a little discernment to what I read and hear, especially the spin coming out of America.
      Let’s get back to enjoying the cricket.

    • @thatsbollox
      @thatsbollox Год назад

      @@Bellas1717 Thats wonderful. Truly it is. However i didnt come here for anyone else's "point of view", for your discernment, definitions of woke, nor your naive evangelical political advice. In fact just take a hike bozo.

  • @pantherz9103
    @pantherz9103 Год назад +1

    Shocking ‘facts’- Sandpaper gate was 5 years ago, not 3! Underarm was ‘81 but I heard him say ‘91! Lazy journalism.

  • @SilverZankarne
    @SilverZankarne Год назад +22

    England fan here - Aus fully entitled to run Bairstow out and I probably would have done the same thing in Cummins' shoes. It's not Australia's job to teach Bairstow when he can leave his crease just as it's not England's job to teach Mitchell Starc how to catch.

    • @gtaveteran
      @gtaveteran Год назад

      Spot on mate ! i also find it to be a ridiculous argument that because of what happened in Cape Town YEARS ago that Australia/Pat Cummins was supposed to withdraw the appeal & give Bairstow a free pass

    • @pimp4984
      @pimp4984 Год назад

      Have you been to Lord's Cricket Ground mate?

    • @gtaveteran
      @gtaveteran Год назад +1

      @@pimp4984 No, but i bet the tears of lords & sirs from the long room taste pretty sweet though.

  • @AdamDermody
    @AdamDermody Год назад +13

    Bairstow marked his crease before the ball reached Carey. Therefore it’s not the end of the over he should have looked behind him

    • @acerimmeh
      @acerimmeh Год назад +1

      Agreed. I timed Bairstow ducking the ball (ball above his head), to the moment he started to move out of his crease at 1.8 seconds. Who walks out the crease in 1.8 seconds of ducking a bouncer and does not expect to be stumped.

    • @AdamDermody
      @AdamDermody Год назад +1

      @@acerimmeh haha exactly and thats fast if the ball goes through to the keeper on the full let alone bouncing on the way to the keeper

  • @theflyingdropbear2009
    @theflyingdropbear2009 Год назад +1

    the ball was live when Bairstow got stumped, it isn't the Australians' responsibility to remind an experienced player to keep his bat grounded until the ball is deemed dead at the end of the over by the bowler's end umpire, that is the first thing we are taught when we pick up a cricket bat for the first time. Bairstow never looked back to Carey to get the all the clear, he just walked away from the crease in a daze.
    The non-existent controversy brought up by a bunch of sore losers isn't going to change the fact that Bairstow made a beginner's mistake, even though he is an experienced player, and he is also a wicket-keeper, he should have known better than that. He simply had a significant lapse in concentration, which denied him of having any amount of situational awareness.
    I find it very amusing that the people complaining about it the most, are the ones who wrote the laws of the game, the very same laws that rightly denied Starc of a catch when he grounded the ball, and the very same laws that got Bairstow out, in short, the Australians did nothing wrong, and the only in the wrong, is Bairstow himself.

  • @quicksquiz
    @quicksquiz Год назад +8

    England have backed themselves into a corner on this. Most neutrals agree it was fair play. I'm noticing quite a few English posters on social media saying it was fair play. Then add the likes of Vaughan, Strauss, Atherton, Hussain and Butcher all saying it was fair play. Bad losing is bad cricket and this will tarnish Englnd for a long time.

    • @Roy3.16
      @Roy3.16 Год назад +1

      @quicksquiz
      even England's only odi world cup winner Captain Morgan supported Carey

  • @rondunn4336
    @rondunn4336 Год назад +8

    How can anyone complain, rules are rules, simple.

  • @ratanlal4792
    @ratanlal4792 Год назад +1

    Sprit of the game 😀😀😀😀😀why England not share world Cup trophy with Newzealand 2019..stroke even said umpire give 5run itself 😀😀😀😀..hypocrisy beyond words

  • @MultiDwang
    @MultiDwang Год назад +7

    The interesting thing here was about Steve Smith's mum crying, and Piers talked over that !!! That's not cricket Piers.

  • @garystrahan4601
    @garystrahan4601 Год назад +37

    They're only crying because no matter how many times Bairstow has tried doing this very same thing he lacks Carey’s far superior skills and keeps missing.

    • @jamesjones-z4u
      @jamesjones-z4u Год назад +1

      Aussies keep saying Bairstow has tried doing this, can’t provide any examples. Almost like it’s a lie.

    • @thesupplantor
      @thesupplantor Год назад

      @@jamesjones-z4u if you actually open the other eye and check media outside of that idiot Piers Morgan there's plenty of evidence of Pommy sneakiness and hypocrisy. You wankers just can't handle that Australia always win fair and square.

    • @theearthrexden
      @theearthrexden Год назад +4

      @@jamesjones-z4ugo back and watch the second test. He tired it against Warner and also in the second innings against Marnus

    • @Roy3.16
      @Roy3.16 Год назад +1

      @@theearthrexden also tried against Head at Edgbaston

    • @uskumarmate
      @uskumarmate Год назад

      ​@@theearthrexdenplease go back and learn the rules of the game. Bairstow did that to them when they took guard outside the crease not when they were going to talk to their mate at the end of an over. Different scenarios

  • @mosa4688
    @mosa4688 Год назад +1

    Simon Taufel, who is a former ICC Elite Umpire and current member of the MCC laws sub-committee, has written this post on LinkedIn discussing the Jonny Bairstow dismissal during the second Ashes Test at Lord's:
    "Was Jonny Bairstow’s dismissal at Lords a breach of the Spirit of Cricket? This is a question I have been inundated with, so I thought it best to share my thoughts publicly by asking everyone a question or eight to consider…
    1. "Have you seen any umpire tell a fielding side that the keeper standing back is not allowed to attempt a stumping?
    2. "Was there a complaint from anyone when Bairstow tried to stump Marnus exactly the same way in the first innings?
    3. "What has Jonny Bairstow said about his dismissal? He has been very quiet. Why?
    4. "My experience is when people don’t like a dismissal under the Laws of Cricket, they cite the Spirit of Cricket to support their view.
    5. "Which part of the codified Preamble (the Spirit of Cricket) was breached by the fielding side?
    6. "What did the fielding side do in effecting a legitimate dismissal that unfairly impacted the ability of the batter in their attempt not to be dismissed? (Did they run into him or distract him or prevent him making good his ground?)
    7. "Should a batter be immune from dismissal as per the Laws by simply being negligent (and leaving his ground too early)?
    8. "Did England retire Ben Duckett when they disagreed with the Starc catch decision as per the Laws and umpires’ decision?
    "The hypocrisy and lack of consistency from some people and groups is quite interesting and concerning for the future of our game.
    "Maybe I am the odd one out here?
    "The good news is that we are actively engaged with Test cricket, the best form of the game."

  • @andrewb3497
    @andrewb3497 Год назад +5

    The reality is that Carey threw the ball towards the stumps BEFORE Bairstow 'scratched' his boot behind the crease - so the ball was still in play even according to Piers's 'spiritual' rules of the game!

    • @Shandyboy8612
      @Shandyboy8612 Год назад

      Bairstow didn’t expect the keeper to throw the ball at the stumps when he was clearly in the crease when the ball got to him. It is daft by Bairstow there is no doubt but it’s a bit of a dirty way to get someone out. Can people not agree on that?

  • @72aakhan
    @72aakhan Год назад +7

    Piers- I am sorry you are wrong..that was a fair play the Australian.. a fan of yours from New York, NY

  • @samanthacook2495
    @samanthacook2495 Год назад +13

    That infamous underarm move in the game between New Zealand and Australia occurred in 1981, not 1991.

    • @imac1957
      @imac1957 Год назад +2

      And Piers has to go back 42 years to find something to brandish. Sad.

    • @ChrisBrown-or8ky
      @ChrisBrown-or8ky Год назад

      He should ask kiwis. We can find something in every game Brad Haddin played in 😡

    • @flamingfrancis
      @flamingfrancis Год назад

      @@ChrisBrown-or8ky Does the same apply to Brendon McCullum?

  • @petruccifanboi
    @petruccifanboi Год назад +4

    “Scraping his boot denoting that its the end of the over”! My God, the ignorance and illiteracy as far as cricket knowledge is concerned by Piers Morgan in this clip is shocking !

  • @beachboy13600
    @beachboy13600 Год назад +12

    the umpire was right

  • @redhammer9910
    @redhammer9910 Год назад +25

    You can detect the healthy rivalry and humour attached to the carry on, just !
    Go Aussies !!

  • @Cmjd0923
    @Cmjd0923 Год назад +2

    I was at the MCG when the underarm was bowled. It is something to hear 80,000 fans boo their team.
    Also, the batsman does not end the over, where does that come from?

  • @SriGutta
    @SriGutta Год назад +9

    If Carey missed the ball and it went to the boundary, would it be called a dead ball because Bairstow marked his crease and signalled end of over. Bairstow was just dopey.. He had no idea where the ball was.

    • @JoeMicroscope
      @JoeMicroscope Год назад

      Yes of course it would. England would not have taken the runs.

  • @trevaudio
    @trevaudio Год назад +5

    Bairstow was warned by the Australian wicket keeper, if he stepped outside again, he’d stub him out…..tough luck little englanders !!!

  • @bradslowgrove1128
    @bradslowgrove1128 Год назад +1

    Linking this to sand paper gate is virtually an admission that they have no case in regard to the current situation and Morgan is desperate..Bairstow walked out of his crease after the ball was thrown by Carey immediately after being pouched by him and was still in the air not before Bairstow lumbered up the pitch. That makes it open and shut.I have never heard of '' marking'' your crease before. That is a new one on me and comes late in the media onslaught after Australia has marked its crease on Bairstow and moved on.. It that has not been mentioned before nor have I ever heard it ever mentioned by any of the expert test cricket commentators ever. What is Bairstow? A rhinoceros. Who was supposed to see this crease marking anyway and interpret it when mixed in with all Bairstow's fidgeting around in his pissing patch? Is there a rule of the game giving it force as to stumpings and run outs if it is of such significance or perhaps its the ritual that summons up the ''spirit'' of the game.? Carey was keeping to a quick, Green, and was well back from the stumps at a slightly lower elevation and his vision of the crease is obscured by the wicket and the rhinoceros Bairstow. I just hope next time Bairstow does not adopt the full procedure of how rhinos mark their territory. Did Carey see this marking of the crease or even did Pat Cummings or is this whole late assertion of ''crease marking'' something that Piers Morgan pulled out of his ass when cornered and is now ''marking his crease''. I played competition cricket as a youngster and earlier on as a wicketkeeper that has stumped batters and I never heard of it.This guy Piers Morgan is a self promoter, not too bright and his mental associations are crude and unsophisticated and at the best of times ''omelettes''.
    Morgan has this literally in your face annoying inflated screen presence to conceal that there is not that much behind his big head that is visually pushed down your throat. I doubt his camera people would last long if they switched frame from his annoying over blown close ups. Morgan' s big protruding head recently claimed that the Russian invasion of Ukraine was an illegal war of aggression just like the second Gulf war that he led the Daily Mail charge on this ( presumably with his head like a rhino but without a brain) when he clearly has no legal qualifications. The Second Gulf War is not an illegal war of aggression by either the U.S.A.or the U.K. as neither were attempting to annex Iraq or alter international law boundaries. The First Gulf war was, however, by Hussein who illegally annexed Kuwait and this is the true legal analogy with the war against Ukraine. Morgan is an opinionated big mouth that does not do any research into what he says especially as to idiotic legal statements like that which echo lefty beat ups about the Second Gulf war. Morgan actually trivialized the Russian invasion of Ukraine while he was criticising it in a head butting competition with one of the dime-a-dozen Russian liars conducting the Kremlin's language war that he decided to air as his '' head on lying mouth'' show.
    Why are there always large close ups of his face and head taking up all the screen where guests are reduced and distant? Is he just ''marking his crease'' with his noggin while he talks out of his arse? Do him and Bairstow belong to the same secret Rhino club and you have to drag your feet along the ground to get into the clubhouse hidden away in the confines of the MCC? I wonder if it admits women and ethnic minorities if they know the '' crease mark'' dance as I will now point out?
    This Bairstow sore loser crap is just a tabloid beat up where the real story is the RACISM shown in the MCC Long Room to Khwaja who was not an actor in Bairstow's lawful dismissal that also conforms to the spirit of the game. The English cricket (critic) team have a systemic weakness and that is their rhino tail never wags but their mouth does instead and there is no runs in that. 6 wickets out of 10 is virtually the same as all out to the inventors of the game that they lose more often than not with disguised resentment to the upstart down under colonials. Not just in this team but in prior teams the English bowlers simply regard batting as an annoying delay before they get to bowl at teams that use up to10 wickets to get runs and yet they wonder why they lose.How do they expect to beat a team that will fight right down to the last of 10 wickets when England virtually pull up stumps when their recognised bats are out. Do they mark their crease at 6 wickets? It is relevant here because Bairstow being lawfully dismissed meant unless Stokes had to do it all on his own as he did once before raising British hopes. However, Stokes now had to do it with half-hearted partners or the match would be lost, as it was dashing those raised hopes and causing their sore loser chorus that Bairstow was cheated out by those unbelievers who remained unfazed by the '' spirit'' let loose by Bairstow's rhino impersonation, perhaps adopted from Ionesco's play of the same name in a Peter Brook revival. Aussie do not know all that much about French theatre. No one in English cricket expects the bowlers to save the day with the bat. Why not? That would not be English cricket and that is why losing by over 40 runs means this test was not close at all because 40 runs is beyond the horizon of the English tail and out of their ''unmarked'' crease. In the 1st test Australian tailenders chased down the English total with tail end wickets to spare, batting last on a water logged outfield after losing the toss and instead English cricket whined about their own 8 wicket '' Bazball'' declaration when Root had run out of real partners like Stokes because Bairstow's ''marked crease'' went unnoticed by the colonial trespassers. Stay on message and the message on this is the RACISM that surfaced in the Long Room against Khwaja who not coincidentally has been consistently the biggest thorn in the side in outgunning the English 6 wicket batting team by frustrating its no bat bowling team. The MCC dropped their guard and showed their true colors about this Bairstow beat up when they quickly shifted their focus to Khwaja who was unconnected to the Bairstow incident and letting their mask slip unless of course Khwaja was the only player aware of rhino Bairstow '' marking his crease''.? Is Bairstow a white or a black rhino? We all know the answer to that one, don,t we?. Be careful this Australian side has no systemic weaknesses and if you make them angry then England may get annihilated after '' marking their crease'' at 6 wickets.

  • @mvubu6823
    @mvubu6823 Год назад +27

    Just look for the clips of Bairstow being interviewed of doing the same thing. He has NO issue with it.

    • @mvubu6823
      @mvubu6823 Год назад +6

      @@paulhiggins6024 what does that even mean?
      You're either in or out of your crease. The the very definition of STUMPED says it applies when the batsman is NOT TRYING TO TAKE A RUN.
      This whinging and rewriting of the rules is just nuts.
      Bairstow quote from earlier in his career (you can find it on RUclips) "it's part of the game even if the batter doesn't like it."

    • @aawe1
      @aawe1 Год назад +1

      @@paulhiggins6024 LOL

    • @aawe1
      @aawe1 Год назад +1

      Yes, Notts vs. Yorkshire in 2014, end-of-day interview on day 3 Bairstow

    • @francisvincent3484
      @francisvincent3484 Год назад

      @@paulhiggins6024 if throw missed wickets stokes would have called him for an overthrow if no fielder to field it. There IS an advantage as he has reduced distance to run therefore reduces risk of being run out at non strikers end

    • @thesupplantor
      @thesupplantor Год назад +1

      @@paulhiggins6024 “It’s within the rules of the game and that’s how it is!” - Bairstow 2014