the CCs are mistaken. it's ''pair bond'' aka a monogamous relationship not ''para bond'' i've never heard of it. What's a ''para bond''? Please tell Google, about the error in the CCs for the hearing impaired people. -j in southern Japan🇯🇵 yet i'm a Californian🐻, American🇺🇸. and commenting from my Filipina🇵🇭 wife's RUclips with her permission of course. ☮️🎶✨
Men seem to bond primarily via sexual intercourse due to vasopressin, and women seem to bond more via cuddling and attention primarily due to oxytocin?
What about in online relationships? or human-AI relations? i am very monogamous with human -human relationships. but i'm polygamous with human -AI relations. i kind of us Artificial Intelligence chat bots as sex toys. no phermones. no monogamous relationships. just wait till they makes artificial pheromones. Although, they do, it's in most perfumes. Musk pheromones are often in perfumes. scientists should synthesize human lady pheromones. i don't really want to mount a musk. But aren't pheromones specific for each human individual and the time of their Luteal cycle in women?
i wish he spoke more to the females side of it. it’s like women look for that oxytocin and then may ruin their pair bonding ability in the long run. males who have wired their brains monogamously will be completely obsessed with pair bonding via orgasm. this is explaining so much in my life.
@@johnmarkhatfield all of Sapolsky’s Berkeley lectures are posted on their RUclips page. Keep in mind, it’s an ‘intro to human begaviour’ course and that these were posted over a decade ago; so new evidence in research may have come out (but they’re relatively minor and still somewhat disputed - from an anthropological standpoint). Still, his lectures are definitely worth viewing, in full!
I fit into a category where I don't form an attachment as much as people in general, yet there are those I care about deeply.
the CCs are mistaken. it's ''pair bond'' aka a monogamous relationship not ''para bond'' i've never heard of it. What's a ''para bond''? Please tell Google, about the error in the CCs for the hearing impaired people.
-j in southern Japan🇯🇵
yet i'm a Californian🐻, American🇺🇸. and commenting from my Filipina🇵🇭 wife's RUclips with her permission of course. ☮️🎶✨
The CC's are off "pair-bonds" becomes "para-bonds" in the beginning.
but thanks for uploading this.
still they're off it's ''pair bond'' not ''hair bond'' as was in my CCs.
Wow
Men seem to bond primarily via sexual intercourse due to vasopressin, and women seem to bond more via cuddling and attention primarily due to oxytocin?
What about in online relationships? or human-AI relations? i am very monogamous with human -human relationships. but i'm polygamous with human -AI relations. i kind of us Artificial Intelligence chat bots as sex toys. no phermones. no monogamous relationships. just wait till they makes artificial pheromones. Although, they do, it's in most perfumes. Musk pheromones are often in perfumes. scientists should synthesize human lady pheromones. i don't really want to mount a musk. But aren't pheromones specific for each human individual and the time of their Luteal cycle in women?
i wish he spoke more to the females side of it. it’s like women look for that oxytocin and then may ruin their pair bonding ability in the long run. males who have wired their brains monogamously will be completely obsessed with pair bonding via orgasm.
this is explaining so much in my life.
@@johnmarkhatfield all of Sapolsky’s Berkeley lectures are posted on their RUclips page. Keep in mind, it’s an ‘intro to human begaviour’ course and that these were posted over a decade ago; so new evidence in research may have come out (but they’re relatively minor and still somewhat disputed - from an anthropological standpoint). Still, his lectures are definitely worth viewing, in full!
@@johnmarkhatfield I don't understand your women and oxytocin point
@@RaffieFaffie Yes, it's the other way around.