Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Picasso 1932: Love, Fame, Tragedy at Tate Modern
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 авг 2024
- In middle age Pablo Picasso became enraptured by Marie-Thérèse Walter, a young woman he had met on a Parisian street. The Art Channel visits Tate Modern's exhibition to understand how Marie-Thérèse became Picasso's muse. How did his infatuation for her inspire his art? Grace Adam and Joshua White investigate why Picasso's images of 1932 are challenging and unforgettable.
Twitter: @theartchannel1
Instagram: @the_art_channel1
Facebook: / theartchanneluk
The Art Channel films and reviews exhibitions of Contemporary Art. We aim to make art and exhibitions accessible for everyone. Grace Adam is an artist and educator. Joshua White is a lecturer and writer. Between us, we work for the Tate Gallery, The National Portrait Gallery, The Royal Academy, The University of the Arts, Flash Art, Christie's Education and Sotheby's Institute. The Art Channel is a member of Canvas, The Arts Council's online hub for the arts. All the opinions are our own. Please feel free to subscribe, add your comments, share our videos and give a thumbs up, if you've enjoyed any film. For more details and further contact information see graceadam.com and joshuaswhite.com. Subscribe to The Art Channel VIP list at www.theartchan...
We may earn a small commission if you buy something after clicking the links below. The Art Channel is independent and receives no funding.
The National Gallery shop
tidd.ly/3owLkKF
Tiqets - Find great cultural attractions to visit anywhere in the world
tidd.ly/3B1cqRA
--------------------------------------
UDEMY COURSES
Post-Painterly Abstraction
(The Origins of Contemporary Art)
tidd.ly/3B15ZOk
Wassily Kandinsky and the Masters of Expressionist Art
(The Beautiful Birth of Non-Objectivity)
tidd.ly/3clqJGa
Pablo Picasso and Cubism
(Cubism and the Emergence of Abstraction)
tidd.ly/3OqUdQs
Kazimir Malevich and the Suprematist Artists
(The Origins of Pure Design)
tidd.ly/3IPvG6i
Click this link to look at other Udemy courses - tidd.ly/3RVrw0W
He goes the distance, sets off visual explosives along the way, returns, leaves and does it again until the brush is released. Changes the way the candlestick maker sees, without knowing the source, what a creative wave.
Absolute master. His power is outstanding.
he was a failing painter so he turned to a clown
Grace and Joshua are both quite erudite and illuminating. I thoroughly enjoy listening to the two of them expound on these brilliant works of art.
Thank you DJ for supporting The Art Channel.
Picasso touches the finger of reality. Color, shape , space so unique
Girl Before a Mirror is the greatest Picasso painting.
no doubt one of the greatest imo, and my favorites dora maar au chat, i've stared at that the longest and can't even comprehend it!!
If only we could "see" from top, under, and side to side and learn to understand how is the whole! as he put his wisdom in his art!,
An Absolute Genius
Another great video!
Thanks Murray for the support.
The 30's was the best decade for Picasso imo.
Amazing! I love it ❤
Wow, this is a really good and really helpful analysis, especially after having visited in person. You've pointed out a number of things I missed entirely. Thank you.
Thanks Sagar. The Art Channel tries to make films that inform as well as open up up discussion.
The extraordinary World of Art is Compmaturism with expresion and colours and emotions
Cool painting, amaxing
Inspiring thank you helps in nudging out those unconsciously imposed boundaries!
i know im asking randomly but does anybody know of a method to get back into an instagram account..?
I somehow lost the password. I love any assistance you can give me.
@Cayson Maximiliano instablaster =)
@London Sonny I really appreciate your reply. I found the site through google and Im waiting for the hacking stuff now.
Seems to take a while so I will reply here later with my results.
@London Sonny it worked and I finally got access to my account again. I am so happy:D
Thank you so much, you saved my ass!
@Cayson Maximiliano no problem :)
💎Perfect!!!💎
NGC 피카소를 다룬 드라마를 보고 피카소가 얼마나 큰 인물인지 알게 되었고 현대미술에 큰 관심을 가지게 되었습니다.
그는 스페인이 낳고 프랑스가 키운 위대한 영웅 입니다
The Art Channel
1 month ago
Please feel free to post constructive comments about the art of Pablo Picasso or the exhibition 'Picasso 1932: Love, Fame, Tragedy'.
Absoluto.
So much analysis.
Picasso.... Was probably doing what came into his mind at the moment.
Interesting perspective! TY 5 1 2022
Describing "Rest (1932)" from 5:05 the picture clearly is the Anatomical sagittal view of a Female Pelvis. The Yellow ball is Faeces floating in the fluid inside the rectum, the middle pink projection is Uterus & there is the Urinary bladder in front of the Uterus.
The uterus seems to have teeth probably he means it catches hold of a man with its teeth. The two white circles on either sides of teeth cud be ovaries or just eye balls.
The interesting part is the entire female internal anatomy is accurately drawn BUT the internal female organs continues as a Phallus (left of the painting) exteriorly pointing downwards with the pink n violet hue...!
I'm not sure if someone else has already given this explanation.
Picasso is indeed a genius !
Svp j'ai cadre Picasso 1933 on Algérie , comnt je fait svp aidez moi
Right now I'm working on "Woman at the mirror" I have a question. On the Abrams book the left side of the woman looks white, but in this video it looks like a soft pink. Could you tell me what the real color is in real life? Thanks.
This is much better with the volume turned off.
In 'Girl Before A Mirror', the picture is either a pregnant woman looking in the mirror, or Picasso imagining the woman seeing herself pregnant in a mirror. Of course, I could be wrong, but when a man fantasizes about a young woman, he often imagines impregnating her.
❤️
Dance of life☺️, or is it the dance of death?
The dance of narcism from an outsider looking in but she doesn't believe he can see her duality. That large hand does typically represent the hand of death so there's that too.
Hey I think I know her in the painting, she did something different with her hair but it's definitely her..
You say Picāsso, I say Picăsso.
I hate it when people describe a painting too much , classic human knows all behavior
poésie et vérité
Somehow I think these two “analysts” circle around the point, viz. beat around the bush. Picasso was a self-described “revolutionary” who always pushed boundaries in his paintings even when he wasn’t famous. So to miss this essential point entirely in his work renders the whole discussion of Picasso’s work moot. And for all their “intelligence of art” they often seem to be stumbling over their words trying to describe a painting. You’d think they would have written down their thoughts first, memorized the good bits, and then give a good presentation, and not sounding like they just came off the streets and are struggling for words to describe the work.
you are to harsh...but maybe they sound like that....BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO IDEA what Picasso was thinking or if he was thinking at all...while he painted this....they are guessing....and that is why...i can not take serious..this form of art....compare this to an analysis of The Starry Night...where interpretations are very possible of van Goghs mind...because his work is recognizable...this stuff...is never recognizable.
Jade Zee i disagree. I wasn’t being harsh, just critical but fair. The “analysts” were stumbling over their words and weren’t saying anything really of importance regarding the work. I love the painting, however, when all is said.
Picasso was a horses backside of a human being
Ummmm it's an ear. Yup. Not genitalia. Not an eye
That is in his mind, ear = " genitalia " please respect his opinion,
I could have done without the 'politically correct' observations at the end.
Agree; getting sniffy about the fact that artists are attracted to women's bodies as well as their minds, is problematic for an art historian.
God what a villain Picasso was, painting nude women.
The fact that he painted nude women isn't the problem: the problem is that he painted nude women while being a misogynist who had horrific views about women. As an example, this is a direct quote from him: "For me there are only two kinds of women: goddesses and doormats." Those views transfer into his depictions of the women he painted, which is why it's worth talking about in discussions of his art.
@@alcy- Yeah but he's dead so it's not really a problem.
@@grungepants But his art still exists and that's what they're analyzing, so it's worth bringing to the table.
@@alcy- I take issue with the fact that none of us knew Picasso or his wife. He could have been really nice and the wife could have been evil. No one knows.People are too gung-ho with the misogynist thing now a days. I wonder if it were a female artist and she said "there are two kinds of men gods and doormat's" would anyone give a shit?
@@grungepants Here's the thing: we do know. Picasso being a misogynist is not a claim that comes from one scornful lover or whatever. He had multiple wives who described it, the people with whom he cheated on said wives attest to it, and he said sexist things in interviews. Basically anyone who has ever studied Picasso or read up on his life agrees that he held these views. This is not even close to an unsupported claim.
바다와 노인
الوان ليست متجانسة او متدرجة
وخطوط مقتضبة ومنبسطة
عظمة pecasso
انة اراد التعبير عن مزاجية الست وكانة
دارس سيكلوجيتها بدقة
He was all about teeth
IT IS ALL ABOUT FORM, NOT LOVE OR DESIRE.
What is that only picaso can tell ?
He may be the greatest artist but i dont understant shit looking at that painting.
Great pictures best left to the individual's eye and brain to indulge NOT be lectured, which inevitably ends up as a rather mediocre soup..why ? because Picasso (in this instance, did something/went somewhere no body else has/did. so Mr Erudite can only explain in art clichés and ends up facile) just detracting..unless of course you like being spoon fed..
Everyone over analyzes. Like the blue period paintings. Everyone thought he was painting in blue because he was sad or depressed. Then someone asked him and he said he just had a lot of blue paint
Regards, i create homnage Picasso
why is it when non artist talk about art it comes off so niave so stupid, it would be like me discussing chainsaw maintainence
Grace Adam is an artist.
i want to make up shit in my head to make me think that my art is worth more
A painting do not need to be explained, to do so can be only the manifestation of two things, one, that the painting has no relation with the real world and no strength on any qualities associated in the visual art such as painting. The second thing which is obvious here is the need to make a commentary to entertain the viewers, a commentary which is a very personal interpretation belonging to the one making it and has no real value overhaul. Picasso himself once asked a galerie owner who wanted to show him some paintings and was making comments before showing him the works to forget about the talk and show the works, that was all there was to do. Management into art is itself an expression of looking at art as a piece of commodity which it is not in essence. To talk about the historical context into which a painting has been created is useful, anything else is unnecessary exception in the technical aspects such as the brush strokes and the colours used which demands looking at close up of the work on its entire surface. As for the artist himself/herself, it is always interesting to know about their personal life and about their time, yet, this doesn’t explained why they adopted such style or choice of colours. Once, a biographer of the British artist L.S.Lowry asked why he had painted the people in his paintings in such a simple manner and was answered ´because that was the only way l knew to paint them’ . Picasso was a revolutionary in the sens that he destroyed all manners of figurative paintings of the past. His creative genius was inspired by ancient works of the antiquities and African masks. Picasso came at an historical time which made it possible for him to impose his works on the art market. It couldn’t have been possible earlier or much later and certainly not without the help of the American wealth which started to invest in modern art in a big way. It remains to be seen what will be left of Picasso complete output in the future. Picasso became an icône in France from the sixties onwards. Money was linked with the name Picasso to the point where his work was secondary as a consideration. It was a merchandise with a price tag high enough to inflate the ego of the millionaires of the time biding in the auction rooms of Sotheby’s & Parke Bernet. Fake Picasso’s are in existence by the hundreds if not thousands, money perverts everything as always.
Block out the sexual part of the painting.
2:12 is it an ear? .. Is it a form of genitalia? ... U even don't know what it is 🤦♂️
😒
هى بتحب بمعدتها ولا بقلبها غريبة نجرب حب المعدة انا بحبك اكثر من اللحمة
Skizofrenia
so wrong
The throat-clearing gets tiresome after a while.