The impression I get here is that Ms M Ngoye was bypassed deliberately because she was or would have been a stumbling block to what was happening with regards to those payments....My impression may be wrong but that's what I believe...the fact that she became aware only on March 2018 lends credence to that...12/2/2024
I am of the view that Ms Ngoye was at odds with the Board for their actions emanating from the findings of the Auditor General that said that Ms Ngoye's headed department is operating with an irregularly appointed panel of attorneys. The question is why insist on the same panel, were they being greazed to act in that matter?
What is wrong with the opposition attorney knowing the contents of a settlement that was concluded in November/December at a time of applying to make it an order of the court in the subsequent month of march, i.e, the following march? A settlement is negotiated, so the other party will have knowledge of the offer and thinking from the other side
Hearsay evidence is admissible in forums of this nature "Tribunals" see Bongoza v Minister of Correctional Service 2002 Transkei High Court by Mr Jafta J..12/2/2024
He is Adv Maleka....I presume the Tribunal cleared him of any conflict of interest. Ms Ngoeye was too charged in this session.....I thought she should just put her version of events in simple and clear terms
This witness, if Judge Makhubele is found Guilty, will be the one who sank her...coz her evidence is crucial. This is an opinion guys not a conclusion. 12/2/2024
The impression I get here is that Ms M Ngoye was bypassed deliberately because she was or would have been a stumbling block to what was happening with regards to those payments....My impression may be wrong but that's what I believe...the fact that she became aware only on March 2018 lends credence to that...12/2/2024
I am of the view that Ms Ngoye was at odds with the Board for their actions emanating from the findings of the Auditor General that said that Ms Ngoye's headed department is operating with an irregularly appointed panel of attorneys. The question is why insist on the same panel, were they being greazed to act in that matter?
What is wrong with the opposition attorney knowing the contents of a settlement that was concluded in November/December at a time of applying to make it an order of the court in the subsequent month of march, i.e, the following march? A settlement is negotiated, so the other party will have knowledge of the offer and thinking from the other side
She is too angry.
Not only angry, she is pushing for the continuation of white law firms to have monopoly in SOEs. This is what this matter is about!
Hearsay evidence is admissible in forums of this nature "Tribunals" see Bongoza v Minister of Correctional Service 2002 Transkei High Court by Mr Jafta J..12/2/2024
Just worrying about conflict of interest re Adv Seleka and the Commission of Inquiry of State Capture in tis hearing.
He is Adv Maleka....I presume the Tribunal cleared him of any conflict of interest. Ms Ngoeye was too charged in this session.....I thought she should just put her version of events in simple and clear terms
His in-depth research and line of questioning challenges the investigation work done by Zondo Commission
This witness, if Judge Makhubele is found Guilty, will be the one who sank her...coz her evidence is crucial. This is an opinion guys not a conclusion. 12/2/2024