What's the difference in price with the waves and UAD equivalent for someone who doesn't have a UAD interface? Would I be right in guessing a few hundred quid?
UAD have a subscription service now, where you can get a growing selection of their plugins, as well as a bunch of quality virtual instruments for $20 a month. No UAD hardware needed. If you have a UAD Apollo interface, you can pick up most of their plugins in sales at really decent prices. If the DSP plugins are in their subscription service, you get the native version free.
@@JohnMarshall-NI Thank you for the response. I have the Waves EQP-1A and it's always served me quit well. What I'm trying to decide however is whether to go down the UAD route as plugin doctor clearly shows how much smoother it is. I'm also torn with the new Kirchhoff EQ as that has received some rave reviews as well.
It shows you how the strength of the various harmonics will vary according to the frequency of the input. e.g. Suppose you're looking at the basic harmonics analysis tab, and you have a fundamental at 1000Hz. You should see some other spikes at even and odd multiples of that like 2k, 3k, 4k, 5k. If you manually move the slider for the frequency, you'll see the amplitude of the spikes varies. e.g. You might have lots of 2nd order (even) harmonics at low frequencies, but they fade out at high frequencies. The Hammerstein analysis basically shows you the value of the first few orders of harmonics varies (or not) over the full range of frequencies so that you don't have to do a manual sweep or try to memorize what happens. To some degree, you should be able to look at that screen and say - for example - "this saturation processor creates lots of 2nd and 4th order (even) harmonics in the bass region, but they drop off at high frequencies, while the odd orders (3rd, 5th, 7th) stay loud across the frequency range". In an alternative scenario, with a saturation plugin that doesn't produce even-order harmonics, you'll see little or nothing for lines 2 and 4, but maybe a steady decline of odd harmonics as the frequency is increased, such as commonly seen with tape saturation. These sort of things can be useful when deciding which kind of saturation you want on your bass or your kick drum. (You may, or may not, want loads of odd harmonics in the low mids, for example, or perhaps you prefer the "warmth" of even harmonics instead).
@@JohnMarshall-NI thanks for the reply, it seems I couldn’t load .components specially but I only realized this after your comment confirming it is possible. Thank you
Plugin doctor crashes my logic pro after loading a second plugin. They need to fix this
What's the difference in price with the waves and UAD equivalent for someone who doesn't have a UAD interface? Would I be right in guessing a few hundred quid?
UAD have a subscription service now, where you can get a growing selection of their plugins, as well as a bunch of quality virtual instruments for $20 a month. No UAD hardware needed.
If you have a UAD Apollo interface, you can pick up most of their plugins in sales at really decent prices.
If the DSP plugins are in their subscription service, you get the native version free.
@@JohnMarshall-NI Thank you for the response. I have the Waves EQP-1A and it's always served me quit well. What I'm trying to decide however is whether to go down the UAD route as plugin doctor clearly shows how much smoother it is. I'm also torn with the new Kirchhoff EQ as that has received some rave reviews as well.
Does anyone know what the Hammerstein part of this plugin does/measures?
It shows you how the strength of the various harmonics will vary according to the frequency of the input. e.g. Suppose you're looking at the basic harmonics analysis tab, and you have a fundamental at 1000Hz. You should see some other spikes at even and odd multiples of that like 2k, 3k, 4k, 5k. If you manually move the slider for the frequency, you'll see the amplitude of the spikes varies. e.g. You might have lots of 2nd order (even) harmonics at low frequencies, but they fade out at high frequencies. The Hammerstein analysis basically shows you the value of the first few orders of harmonics varies (or not) over the full range of frequencies so that you don't have to do a manual sweep or try to memorize what happens. To some degree, you should be able to look at that screen and say - for example - "this saturation processor creates lots of 2nd and 4th order (even) harmonics in the bass region, but they drop off at high frequencies, while the odd orders (3rd, 5th, 7th) stay loud across the frequency range". In an alternative scenario, with a saturation plugin that doesn't produce even-order harmonics, you'll see little or nothing for lines 2 and 4, but maybe a steady decline of odd harmonics as the frequency is increased, such as commonly seen with tape saturation. These sort of things can be useful when deciding which kind of saturation you want on your bass or your kick drum. (You may, or may not, want loads of odd harmonics in the low mids, for example, or perhaps you prefer the "warmth" of even harmonics instead).
@@AutPen38 Amazing thank you!
How do you load UAD plugins (not xUAD) into Plugin doc?
All of my UAD2 (DSP) plugins are showing up in Plugin doctor. You might need to perform a plugin scan of the specific format you are after.
@@JohnMarshall-NI thanks for the reply, it seems I couldn’t load .components specially but I only realized this after your comment confirming it is possible. Thank you
The curve don't matter, just what you hear. I hate wave plugins sound charter
whats this video biut, n ehy you talkin like thst