We shouldn’t care more about a dress than human lives but this made news at one point and people still talk about it… but no fck the starving, sick, struggling and unwell to keep up with this cheap family
The Monroe dress was owned by Ripleys Believe it or Not after winning it in an auction and lent to Kim K after Kris called to complain. The worlds of collecting, selling, donating, and displaying art are so vast and complex with their own politics within each world. Unfortunately things of value gets lost throughout time due to lack of care or education, lack of finance and individual selfish agendas
@@maddylee5607 So Ripley's, Instead of standing their ground and tell Chris *WHY* Kim can't wear it, gave into the pressure. I pray that gown went to the hands of a skilled restoration person who can source the same crystal beads from that era, and can reinforce the seams that was stressed using conservator's techniques similar on how they reinforce Queen Victoria's gowns for display. (edit: Fix of Queen Victoria's name. Victorian? really?)
THANK YOU i was looking for this comment - looks hideous now like some torn rags not like the beautiful siren like way it looked on a thin model vs a curvy one - not every gown is made for a curvy figure and there’s nothing wrong with that it’s just a piece of art not something sold to the masses
Yeah, renting it when you had a perfect replica to fit you is incredibly disrespectful. She knew it wouldn’t fit. They both have very distinct figures but they don’t match. The oyster dress? Meh. She owns it AND there’s a better kept replica in the MOMA.
@@meowwww_06 well i disagree with this statement Just because you can afford something doesn't mean you can do that 😮💨 Especially ruined historical dresses
When you have the money to buy on, then you can talk she bought it, and she can do what she wants with it. You're just a person you could die for. All she cares about is not making a difference. You can't do anything about it, so let it go. It's not a big deal. Mm is dead, and her dress is fine. It's not like she can do anything about it either so stfu
@@crimberliesthe designer literally made Marilyn's dress according to Marilyn's body shape and size. It wasn't made to be worn by anyone else 🫤 Edit: MOM IM FAMOUS
@@sireniral9003 i’m just trying to understand, she wanted her goods and belongings to be destroyed and buried with her ? or was it specifically against other women so they don’t enjoy her stuff after she died ? aren’t both ways narcissistic a little bit anyway .. ?
@@casper3791 that of which she can do because she legally owns the dress. If an expensive beautiful dress that I owned didn’t fit me I’d alter it too, wouldn’t you?
@@bizarrekimten it's not the issue that she altered it to fit her it's the issue that she's altering extremely beautiful dresses that have been worn by incredibly known people and iconic dresses that they've worn or created. Therefore ruining the beauty behind the dresses if you don't agree you don't have to but that is my opinion and you don't have to like it
@@staceyvitale So they are also responsible for not getting licensed to hold on historical pieces. Their workers probably didn't even know the damage that wearing it could do, they weren't trained. You can see it by the videos where they're wearing gloves to hold the dress, even if fashion historians say it's best to hold it with your hands to do less damage. Non licensed institutions shouldn't have such pieces in the first place
It was *NOT* the Smithsonian who cares for that dress. If it were it would have never been allowed out of the museum. It's Ripleys belive it or not who does
Calm down it's just a dress it's supposed to be worn There are even 2 of them so one of them is just a copy. It's the design that makes it unique and the brand can make several more it's not like a piece of art made with the artist own hands that can never be reproduced dine his dead, the seamstress that made this 2 could make a few more but then they wouldn't be exclusive and worth so much.
Well, she was made an exact replica of the monroe dress that fit her, but she still wore the original. I dont think a replica wouldve worked, unfortunately
@@libelinhaa2079 YEA BUT VERY VALUABLE AND THE ONLY ONES IN THE WORLD ARE MORE LIKE PIECES OF ART, think of it as Mona Lisa, it's the only one and original in the world Same with starry night And other very valuable artwork, like statues etc!
@@kr1s.p_alt there are 2 actually and it's not exactly like that because fabric will not last has long has a painting even when not exposed to sunlight and protected from other elements. Also you can't restore it like a painting and even those can and have been destroyed by bad restoration jobs. Btw people can read fine without caps lock 😂
Yet ARTIFACTS need to be cherished! U act like it's something that they can just throw away and isn't an iconic piece of beauty. Oh sure yea let's just ruin authentic art because u know fuck everyone's dreams and hard work that they put their soul into.
They can’t do anything about it after all she got the money and people are doing their job but none of them have respect, she has no respect as he buys and ruins the dresses and neither do the ones who gave her the dress and support her despite damaging such historical and meaningful pieces
Honestly, she’s an icon. She surpassed Paris Hilton, became one of the biggest names in fashion, and she looks good asf in those dresses. She forever changed the way people see them and that’s fucking iconic.
Its not even about kim anymore. If theres only 2 of these dresses and they're as histotic and precious as made out to be.. then they shouldn't be sold.
Its absolutely about kims nasty ass! She comes and waves her checkbook to these museums and borrows these iconic dresses because shes so lame and boring that cant stand out on her own. Why is kim even relevant these days? Because she has money!
Why cant she just have a replica made instead of destroying iconic art pieces? You wouldn't buy the Mona Lisa and have someone paint your face over hers. Her narcissism is insane
Narcissists usually don’t care enough about art to do something like that. Preserving a piece of art would mean that they wouldn’t be able to rub it in everyone’s faces how filthy rich they are.
But people especially us,girls would make fun of her. Sure not everyone but MANY would! Don’t people try to find issues w/popular people? So, people would call her cheap and lame😐😓
It's like buying a painting (lets say Monets Haystacks) and then painting over it to make it match the aesthetic of your house. You simply don't do that.
@@pieiero3006it's true that you can do whatever to the things you own. But you should know there were lots of masterpiece was ruined before they can reach the museum. The museum can't "protect" the arts if their current owner doesn't sell them or donate them to the museum.
If you own it do what you want. What you simply don't do is tell others what to do And also, it's not like that at all. The owner of the dress wanted her to wear it. You don't get a say. Get over it
does she have the rights to do whatever she wants with the dress once she has bought it? yes. Should she have been able to buy it in the first place? hell na
Not to Borrow is absolutely correct. Let them sell the piece. But they should not lend out museum pieces! Isn't that what a museum is for - preservation? Not ruination?
Lol. I know what you mean but there's reallly no need to run. For once, people just need to kindly but firmly use the word "NO" with Kim! It's that simple.
It's both. How is she not at all a problem? EDIT: Since there are a lot of idiots in the comments replying the exact same "it's her dress" let me clear up some things 1. Yeah, it's her dress so she can be held responsible for what she does to it. 2. I don't have to respect or like what she did just because she can legally do it. I think it was distasteful and dumb. 3. My comment is a reply, in response to someone saying its entirely the museum's fault.
Me too. She didn’t want to be the first playmate. He used her. And then buried himself next to her. It takes the term “do anything for clout” to a whole new level. He tied his name to hers and rode that wave into the afterlife. He was a predator.
Yes, be upset with your first world problems. It's not like there's people out there who are still dying from tuberculosis and curable diseases. But yeah you put your foot down over us a piece of cloth. It's the under the world.
I think she feels extremely special when she wears these dresses no one else can, that's why she is willing to destroy these pieces of history, just to feed her own ego and self-importance.
She thinks of herself too highly there was this podcast in which Kanye says that Kim is modern day marilyn. Kim is absolutely vain yeah she’s a billionaire and really made her way but her attitude is horrible
What is wrong with you people. She needs to think she can ruin whatever she wants she thinks she is special she only got famous for her Sex tape and being half naked and so much fake in her body....no respect
I mean why are people selling these "timeless peices of art" to her? This one honestly i dont understand the significance. It was made by a designer and theres just 2. Thats its. Its rare sure but in the end its art thats meant to be worn. She had it altered to fit her its not destroyed
Exactly! Like, yeah Kim is acting hella weird by ruining massive pieces of recent history, but who the hell is selling these things to her or the person who bought these things for her, like… they’re enabling them to pull these sort of stunts!
She DID IN FACT have a recreation with her exact measurements of the Marilyn Monroe dress, but decided las minute to just wear the actual dress. The outrage is not just that the museum lent her the dress, but apparently they did so because she PROMISED them that she only wanted it to make a faithful replica, and obviously LIED.
She bought it, so it's within her own legal rights to do so, and many people should not really care THAT much about a stupid dress. After all, how would it even slightly affect ur life????
@@Thecouncil__1 Imagine dying. Imagine watching people take what you loved and wore, and then wearing it out, ruining it, and then calling you fat because they couldn't fit in YOUR clothes. Shall I just destroy a statue of Christopher Columbus? I mean, we would have found out about America anyways, so he wouldn't be that important, yeah? He just happened to stumble across it, and now we celebrate a day dedicated to him. Unlike Marilyn, his belongings were put in a museum. I've gone a bit far with this I have to admit, but I'm pretty damn sure you wouldn't want people messing with and breaking your stuff.
Why do people keep saying she ruined the Marilyn dress? How did she ruin it exactly? Because if you watch the episode where she wears it, you can see how meticulous she is about preserving it in its original state.
@@noladelrusso7614I'm a fan of Marilyn Monroe, and knew of the Diamond Dress. I grew up watching her old films and singing her old songs. I even have a blue dress similar to that in Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (mine is much easier to walk in...lol). Many of her styles were used by dollmakers - Barbie being one - Bob Mackie has multiple limited editions with Barbie. If you look at the Jem and the Holograms line, there were many influences in colour palette, and designs. The Oyster dress is horrendously ugly. I know that McQueen "pushed boundaries" of fashion, but it's inelegant despite the meaning of it being a "female warrior emerging from beneath the battered shell". I also fail to see why no-one has mentioned the first owner, Angie Barrett, who wore the dress to The (Beaux) Art Ball at Cannes FF in 2003. Despite not being a fan of the Kardashians, WHY is everyone obsessing over a dress from the 2020 oscars? At the Met Gala, KK changed into the gown in a dressing room at the bottom of the steps, and then into a replica of the Diamond dress for the remainder of the event.
@@capsnerd Why would you buy a dress to alter it mayorly if you have more then enough money to have that exact design outcome made on personalized size etc by any team of designers. It would similair to me Painting a Japanese anime girl on the Nachtwacht from Van Gogh if I would be able to pay for the said painting
Hell, if I had the money to afford that, you better believe I’m squeezing myself into that dress. Life is too short to be wondering about what makes other people angry
It’s honestly gross. She destroyed the Marilyn Monroe dress and and then altered another incredibly famous dress. The fact she thinks she has the right to do this is shocking to me
PEOPLE It’s not about the clothes, it’s about the disrespect for the original artist. It’s like buying a famous painting to paint over it. Some clothes aren’t actually meant to be worn, some are specifically designed to be art pieces. And yea, Marilyn didn’t want anyone else to wear that dress, so we should respect her wishes. It was her property, and she should be able to control what happens to it.
If she didn't want it worn she should've put it on her will. Not being an asshole but being legit. Most famous people have wills early for these types of things
fr bro. i was mad at marilyn dress, who the hell landed it to her? they must’ve been the one who got blamed for her ruining the dress. however, this dress was her. different cases. she can do anything with this dress whether you like it or not.
@@TheLastEgg08 I get it tbh I didn't watch the end saying it was bought. But if it's something valuable like a collectors item or something historical, even if it's yours, it's not nice to destroy it. Or, as someone said, it's not ethical. (That's why museums just don't break historic pieces) I think of it as belonging to the society if when the owner (Kim) dies the item will be going to a museum. But again, she didn't ""destroy"" it, she wore it - with that giant butt of hers 😂. I still think ppl need to stop selling/lending/letting her breathe near iconic clothes.
She won't take no for an answer she's as entitled as it gets. With Marilyn's dress she said she made her mum go and demand it when they wouldn't give it to her. They use their connections
Okay maybe I'm wrong here but wouldn't that be plagiarism? Art theft? Like with this newest piece, idk how the designer would have felt about her knocking it off and then wearing it on the red carpet. I grasp the issue here, I'm just saying that idk if art theft is really the answer? Especially as a celebrity who can afford originals
I don't know why she bought the second oyster dress and then paid a 3rd party to alter it, rather than just getting in contact with the house of Alexander McQueen and getting them to make her one to her measurements. That's literally what couture is, and I can't imagine them refusing to do it for her (or do it for Kanye, on her behalf, seeing as it was a gift).
They wouldn’t have made it because the person who made it is no longer alive. It being archival I am surprised they let her have it. But fashion houses won’t just jump to remake an archival piece for anyone. They may have been okay to make something similar, but archival pieces hold their worth because they are never remade.
Maybe because the dress only became historical because of the celebrity who wore it? If the designer makes a dress then hangs it on a wall and declares it his master piece do you really think it will become "art" that has everyone talking.
Nobody should be allowed to have these iconic dresses! Museum was stupid to allow KK to even wear Marilyn’s dress!!! That was one of a kind- she destroyed it! I don’t care how much $$ they paid to “ borrow” or buy that Oyster dress😮Hate me if you like - I could care less! RIP Marilyn ❤👵
Marilyn Monroe said numerous times she didn't want anyone wearing her clothes after she died and that didn't stop Kim Kardashian because she fundamentally doesn't care
She shouldn't have been able to own the dress in the first place, it should have been in a museum or something. We need to stop letting rich people do whatever tf they want just because they can pay outrageous amounts to do it.
They do these outrageous and destructive things with tax money that they bilked the USA government out of. Now us normal citizens live with homelessness messes and crime because there isn’t money to take care of these sad vulnerable people. Every person in the bottom 50% of income pays a higher tax rate than her or any billionaire
😂😂 it’s a dress. Why shouldn’t she be able to own it? Its not like its stolen art from colonized countries Nor is it sacred burial grounds There’s already one in the museum. Ur focused on the wrong thing.
I watched their show. She didn't do anything to it. She couldn't zip it up, so she altered her own spanx and jazzed it up to blend in with the dress, so the dress was open at the back what we were actually seeing at the back was a modified spanx!
She should buy a dress that's been made to suit her body and not try to squeeze inside someone else's dress that's been made for their body type. RIP the Legendary dresses
@THEWEIRDOGOTHVAMPYREWITCH Except it wasn’t her dress. It was Marilyn Monroe’s she altered the ICONIC dress of a deceased woman, and if I’m not mistaken Marilyn explicitly didn’t want anyone to wear that dress. Because Kim had it in her possession suddenly her words don’t matter? Or is it because Marilyn’s dead?
It sickens me that she desecrated Marilyn’s dress!!! How disrespectful and disgusting! Then after her fans were outraged, she does it again with another dress!!! She has enough money to have any dress designed for her and only her, but she continues to ruin iconic dresses for others!!!😡
Bro it's an dress calm down 🤓... Whyyy like whyyy everyone is so sad like someone who was owner of the dress sell this dress to her and as a owner she have fully right to do whatever she want...like why why everyone is so furious... it's just an dress😭
@@athena4658I get why your mad but if the original designer of the dress passes it down to someone, and THEY decide to sell it to Kim, it's not narcissistic... It feels wrong to you but at the same time, she didn't ruin it. She is gifted it. Just because it has a history doesn't mean it's untouchable. If you want to wear it, you have to pay for it. If Kanye gave you a dress to wear why would you not wear it? I know some people have possessions ripped away from them but Kim is not at fault. She literally just bought an expensive and historical dress. It's dumb to hate HER more than any of the resellers who want to give it away 💀
@@hueningpieim with you i dont get it either. Ohhh but the dress has a meaningful story and the designer... dude if the thing is so important why is it being sold to whoever 😅 if you made something that shouldnt be changed sell it to collectors. If i paid for something its my right to wear it to tear it to burn it if i want to thats the point of OWNING something, it gives you the right.
Your statement is correct, however this is what rich people have done throughout all of history: plundering artifacts that do not belong to them and then act like they own or discovered them. Most of the British monarchy crown jewels were obtained in this fashion.
@@Kikobekillinit Lizzo was given permission *by* the owners of the crystal flute, and had the necessary background to treat the flute with respect and Did so. That's way different.
I cannot believe i have to say this, but this is HER dress. If she wants to alter it/ruin it/set it on fire, she has the right to do so. It belongs to her
It was a piece of history first and if she is allowed to ruin it, people are allowed to be upset about it. The generations of the future will never appreciate it the same.
Ok I'm glad it wasn't just me. I was like 'That's not the Oyster Dress, the Oyster Dress is absolutely stunning...and that's a Mummy cosplay." But then it is. And I dont understand what she did.
This woman is rich enough to commission an exact replica of these dresses so that they can be preserved and would actually flatter her, but instead she is so full of herself she thinks she deserves to wear the exact originals. This is so ridiculous.
exactly. her body is very different from the measurements of these dresses. She couldn't of been comfortable squeezing in Marilyn Monroe's gown. Nor she would of been comfortable with this one. She could of had her own "Swan dress" moment and have something made that fits her perfectly, and steal the show with how drop dead gorgeous it is.
@@jab20243 But that dress isnt even made for an hour glass figure. Its made to drape, not be snug tight. The whole effect is lost on Kim Kardashian. She makes an exquisite couture dress look like its off the rack from Top Shop. 🤮
No she didn't she lost 20 lbs to get into the dress. She knew she wouldn't fit in it so she lost the weight to do so. Marilyn wasn't a stick thin girl either.
Marilyn Monroe is a beautiful Hollywood actress who's influence will be around for generations to come. Kim Kardashian has permanently destroyed part of the actress's soul by selfishly slashing the dress and maker's legacy just to fit her silicone hips.
@mistybollinger3312 lol Kim will NEVER be as beautiful,classy,and iconic as Marilyn was and it kills her!!!! I love it. Marilyn is queen forever and always
I am curious, which one is in the wrong? Kim and Kanye for buying then altering their dress, or the people that sold them the dress? don't mean to attack I just really want to know since you actually study this field (as a business student I have no idea)
@@suelviadomingos5411 both The business shouldn’t sell it that gown is a very unique piece of art And Kim and Kanye shouldn’t have bought it Although since they bought it they have all the rights to the dress Hence the business is more in the wrong But if on the other hand Kim should still respect the piece even if it’s legally her dress
@@Imdrunk_ if there are 2 of them, one of them is a reproduction and the only reason they make so few is to sell exclusivity and increase the price tag but the dress was always meant to be worn. If designers don't sell they won't be able to make more iconic pieces. I don't think it's anyone's business to say what a brand should and shouldn't do with their own stuff
You know the next Met is Karl Lagerfeld themed so let’s see what timeless and irreplaceable Chanel dress she’ll slaughter for that occasion. I can hear Karl turning in his grave just thinking about it.
Well when people have enough money they can kinda basically have anything they want remember everyone has a right price and that museum probably did to 🤷
Fr like. Mf so what if only a couple were made. They were made to be worn. And if someone buys one, then it's yours. What? She's gonna buy a dress and store it away forever so it can slowly wither away? Leave her be
@@pfc_escalante …… excuse me.. are you I.. I can’t comprehend what you just said. Either you don’t give a crap about history of any kind or you’re outright stupid
We as a society need to stop making these people famous. Don’t watch their shows, don’t buy their merchandise. Don’t buy magazines with them in it, don’t click on articles about them. They will eventually go away and stop being a cold sore on society.
Yep I totally agree. Marilyn Monroe unlike her had true talent and had an enormous IQ (which sadly is not that well known about her.) Kim K is a self absorbed talentless reality star who is only famous for inherited wealth, a sex tape, and a failed marriage to a rapping Nazi lover. You only need money and a night vision nudie to get famous in the country.
It's unfortunate that in America our attention span is getting smaller and smaller that thoughtless and talentless people can be famous for no true merit.
@@anthonymcneil4238You could say that about anything that's stored in a museum, paintings being rotting wood and fabric, etc., so not an argument to me.
What pisses me off more is that Kim already had a replica of Marilyn's dress made. Yet she still chose to wear the original that was too small on her and completely stretch it out. If Kim's rich enough to have someone make a replica of Marilyn's dress for her. She can also have a replica oyster dress made specially for her, there's no reason for her to be wearing/ruining historical pieces when she can have a replica made.
She didn't Ruin the real thing and he wore the replica a majority of the night. She o lying wore the real thing to walk up the stairs. Also the owners of the dress recently had it on display at a convention in Florida and publicly said Kim DIDN'T RUIN the dress.
@@andrerwhaag2734 its still disrespectful af. Marilyn specifically said she didn’t want anyone else to wear it but for some reason these celebrities have a hard time staying behind the boundary.
Her exhusband had bought this one for her as a gift. People are allowed to wear their own clothes. Many people wear and alter vintage clothes. Though she did not own the Marilyn Monroe dress, it was archived, thats why it's so sad it was harmed.
@@chicka-chickaslimcheyney2914 don't give it to em then,everyone here is giving them what they want, then telling me im defending them cause i told them to stop caring for what ppl do with the shit the bought. everyone doesn't realize their the reason to why they are this way, quit giving them attention.
I'm so disappointed... How is it possible that you can destroy history just because you have money. I'm really mad at the people who agreed giving her the dress...
The thing is: She (or maxbe Kayne) bought it. It belongs to her. It may upset people but she can do what she wants with it. And it is a dress... it is meant to be worn even if it is haute couture. The same thing with the Monroe dress. She payed to rent it. It's Ripley's that decided that this is a good idea. And Kim get's all the media intention every time. It totally works for her.
That's...what brands expect though??? To sell their designs. Do you think they just spend millions on designs and fashions shows just for the heck of it? She is a public figure but the haute couture industry caters to an existing customer range... that buy clothes. she bought the dress and made it to her size, it's the fundamental job of a haute couture atelier to do that for their client. I know it can infuriate some people but it is what it is
I grew up in a historical area and if you bought a historical house you are allowed to live in it but you couldn’t do things like renovate or tear out the original flooring I feel like this falls under that category
There are lots of places like that. If that makes someone happy good for them. I would never live in a historical home. I want my home to reflect me. And in the end we can't freeze frame life and turn everything into something historical that can't be touched.
That is a perfect description of her. I get so tired of hearing about those people. They're trash, through and through. Add Bruce Jenner to the mix, and damn.
I don't like Kim but I'm going to be fair with my opinion. she literally owns it. She has the right to do anything to this dress now because it's HER dress now.
She did not wear the dress from the Smithsonian, the one she tried to wear is from Ripley's Orlando ( couldnt get it over her hips) after making a charitable donation and she wore a replica in the end.
Well if the people are upset about this being legally allowed to happen then protest until a law is created that preserves museum artifacts and prevents anyone from buying the original.
@@donatella5409 yeah, so its just a dress. The other one is still in a museum so get over it, its not even your dress. And the "damage" has already been done so unless u wanna hire someone to steal the damn dress from her...
They should not be selling historic pieces to celebrities.
We shouldn’t care more about a dress than human lives but this made news at one point and people still talk about it… but no fck the starving, sick, struggling and unwell to keep up with this cheap family
Or let them get away with murder… 😩
Yes. This is the bigger issue. They’re so desperate for cash they’re willing to ruin art for a rich brat?
It's like buying limited editions for really rich people💀💀 quite literally limited
It’s not historic it’s just one of 2
Clearly the curators of these historical dresses don’t value them as they should or they would’ve told them no.
There dead how can they say no
@@zionglory1001 you don't know what a curator is do you
The Monroe dress was owned by Ripleys Believe it or Not after winning it in an auction and lent to Kim K after Kris called to complain.
The worlds of collecting, selling, donating, and displaying art are so vast and complex with their own politics within each world. Unfortunately things of value gets lost throughout time due to lack of care or education, lack of finance and individual selfish agendas
@@maddylee5607 So Ripley's, Instead of standing their ground and tell Chris *WHY* Kim can't wear it, gave into the pressure. I pray that gown went to the hands of a skilled restoration person who can source the same crystal beads from that era, and can reinforce the seams that was stressed using conservator's techniques similar on how they reinforce Queen Victoria's gowns for display. (edit: Fix of Queen Victoria's name. Victorian? really?)
It's a dress...pieces of fabric. They have no real value in famine.
She's collecting those items like Infinity stones i can't -
So accurate!
😭
😂😂😂😂
Swiii u love movies
She’s creating scandal. Cause all press, even bad, is good.
Her alterations made a previously gorgeous gown absolutely hideous 😭
THANK YOU i was looking for this comment - looks hideous now like some torn rags not like the beautiful siren like way it looked on a thin model vs a curvy one - not every gown is made for a curvy figure and there’s nothing wrong with that it’s just a piece of art not something sold to the masses
Kim is apparently really good at that. She can take a design that is otherwise intriguing or beautiful, and make it look cheap and tacky.
Agreed
They made an EXACT REPLICA in her size and she still decided to wead Marilyn's original one
Cause she thinks she's fit the dress while the dress is unzipped😂
Yeah, renting it when you had a perfect replica to fit you is incredibly disrespectful. She knew it wouldn’t fit. They both have very distinct figures but they don’t match.
The oyster dress? Meh. She owns it AND there’s a better kept replica in the MOMA.
*she paid for it she can do whatever she wants*
@@meowwww_06 well i disagree with this statement
Just because you can afford something doesn't mean you can do that 😮💨
Especially ruined historical dresses
When you have the money to buy on, then you can talk she bought it, and she can do what she wants with it. You're just a person you could die for. All she cares about is not making a difference. You can't do anything about it, so let it go. It's not a big deal. Mm is dead, and her dress is fine. It's not like she can do anything about it either so stfu
The saddest part about Marilyns dress is not even that she ruined it, but that Marilyn explicitly wanted no one else to ever wear that dress...
she was a narcissist too ?
@@crimberliesno she wasn't
@@crimberliesthe designer literally made Marilyn's dress according to Marilyn's body shape and size. It wasn't made to be worn by anyone else 🫤
Edit: MOM IM FAMOUS
@@sireniral9003 i’m just trying to understand, she wanted her goods and belongings to be destroyed and buried with her ? or was it specifically against other women so they don’t enjoy her stuff after she died ? aren’t both ways narcissistic a little bit anyway .. ?
@@crimberlies it's her stuff, it's not narcissistic. Those dresses belonged to her. Whatever and however she wanted her stuff was her decision
People need to stop selling her these timeless outfits
anything for money
How did she ruined it please tell me??
@@kalyanirumale1986 she altered and changed parts of the dress
@@casper3791 that of which she can do because she legally owns the dress. If an expensive beautiful dress that I owned didn’t fit me I’d alter it too, wouldn’t you?
@@bizarrekimten it's not the issue that she altered it to fit her it's the issue that she's altering extremely beautiful dresses that have been worn by incredibly known people and iconic dresses that they've worn or created. Therefore ruining the beauty behind the dresses if you don't agree you don't have to but that is my opinion and you don't have to like it
Thank goodness one is preserved in a museum. I hope McQueen refuses to design for her in protest of how she had no regard for his previous works.
McQueen has passed away in 2010.
Had he been alive, she probably wouldn’t have been able to in the first place. We’re two for two on her disrespecting the dead.
@@localmenace3043because kim k is a coward and the dead can’t defend themselves
He's dead tho so he can't really design something for her anyway
Marilyn’s dress should NEVER have been allowed out of the Smithsonian
frrrr
Well Ripley's as far as I know doesn't even have museum credentials so
@@wyass4722 and
@@staceyvitale So they are also responsible for not getting licensed to hold on historical pieces. Their workers probably didn't even know the damage that wearing it could do, they weren't trained. You can see it by the videos where they're wearing gloves to hold the dress, even if fashion historians say it's best to hold it with your hands to do less damage. Non licensed institutions shouldn't have such pieces in the first place
It was *NOT* the Smithsonian who cares for that dress. If it were it would have never been allowed out of the museum. It's Ripleys belive it or not who does
“Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me” Stop giving this chick works of art
Her husband bought it for her. Nobody "gave it" to her.
*Yep! Especially since she & her clan has ruined much more than just a few dresses...!!!*
@@notsunnydaysahead *stop selling this to her then
@@nixie117 makes no sense. Why don't you buy it to protect it?
Stop giving her attention. We should give her the ole Marie Antionette.
Someone get this lady a tailor that can perfectly replicate these dresses instead of her ripping and tearing them to shreds
Calm down it's just a dress it's supposed to be worn
There are even 2 of them so one of them is just a copy. It's the design that makes it unique and the brand can make several more it's not like a piece of art made with the artist own hands that can never be reproduced dine his dead, the seamstress that made this 2 could make a few more but then they wouldn't be exclusive and worth so much.
Well, she was made an exact replica of the monroe dress that fit her, but she still wore the original. I dont think a replica wouldve worked, unfortunately
@@libelinhaa2079 YEA BUT VERY VALUABLE AND THE ONLY ONES IN THE WORLD ARE MORE LIKE PIECES OF ART, think of it as Mona Lisa, it's the only one and original in the world
Same with starry night
And other very valuable artwork, like statues etc!
@@kr1s.p_alt there are 2 actually and it's not exactly like that because fabric will not last has long has a painting even when not exposed to sunlight and protected from other elements. Also you can't restore it like a painting and even those can and have been destroyed by bad restoration jobs.
Btw people can read fine without caps lock 😂
Yes with her fake ass and fake body that is so exaggerated that it literally doesn’t exist in nature. It’s ridiculous.
She's allowed to, but she shouldn't.
if you are in charge of a ICONIC and VERY UNIQUE dress, do your job properly. it doesn’t matter who is trying to get it, ITS A FREAKING ARTIFACT.
Yet ARTIFACTS need to be cherished!
U act like it's something that they can just throw away and isn't an iconic piece of beauty.
Oh sure yea let's just ruin authentic art because u know fuck everyone's dreams and hard work that they put their soul into.
The world is fucked
I totally agree with you
@@loyxifengal2171 that’s what they were saying.
ikr, ppl keep trying to sell them..
We should be mad at the people who let her buy and rent these important dresses
And the one who bought and altered it
Why u care sm what she does
We shouldn't be mad at all. She is wearing her dress how she wants.
why not both 👨🦯
They can’t do anything about it after all she got the money and people are doing their job but none of them have respect, she has no respect as he buys and ruins the dresses and neither do the ones who gave her the dress and support her despite damaging such historical and meaningful pieces
People need to stop giving/selling her these dresses
for the money she's probably putting on the table, I sadly doubt they will
@@frenchish1177 same 😢
I Hope they sell the second one too… I’m sorry the dresses are disgusting
Least she can afford it broky
Honestly, she’s an icon. She surpassed Paris Hilton, became one of the biggest names in fashion, and she looks good asf in those dresses. She forever changed the way people see them and that’s fucking iconic.
For the Monroe dress, there was rhinestones or what they are missing, the zipper was destroyed, and the material warped.
Its not even about kim anymore.
If theres only 2 of these dresses and they're as histotic and precious as made out to be.. then they shouldn't be sold.
Its absolutely about kims nasty ass! She comes and waves her checkbook to these museums and borrows these iconic dresses because shes so lame and boring that cant stand out on her own. Why is kim even relevant these days? Because she has money!
Marilyn's Dress was not sold to her ...
Money and power are a terrible thing
That's why it's fake news to distract
Why cant she just have a replica made instead of destroying iconic art pieces? You wouldn't buy the Mona Lisa and have someone paint your face over hers. Her narcissism is insane
I would
Ikr? 😭 She is a BILLIONAIRE. she can afford it 😭
Narcissists usually don’t care enough about art to do something like that. Preserving a piece of art would mean that they wouldn’t be able to rub it in everyone’s faces how filthy rich they are.
thats a good question, if I was Kim, I would ask for a replica (on what you said) instead of wearing an iconic dress of history
But people especially us,girls would make fun of her. Sure not everyone but MANY would! Don’t people try to find issues w/popular people? So, people would call her cheap and lame😐😓
call her lara croft the way she be raiding tombs 💀💀💀
bro 💀
That is literally her dress, she can do what she wants with it
@@Eunjichoi05 If I buy the Mona Lisa, can I eat it?
@@nerveagent1905 if you want to? Won’t be good for you, but you do you if you really want to eat it
@@nerveagent1905 yes
Who tf sold them the dress in the first place? Thats who to blame.
It's like buying a painting (lets say Monets Haystacks) and then painting over it to make it match the aesthetic of your house. You simply don't do that.
you can do whatever you want with things you own. if you dont want "arts" to be destroyed keep them in a museum and dont sell
@@pieiero3006it's true that you can do whatever to the things you own. But you should know there were lots of masterpiece was ruined before they can reach the museum. The museum can't "protect" the arts if their current owner doesn't sell them or donate them to the museum.
@@kieunhungpham7869 they already had that dress and they decided to sell it to kim k
I agree like rich people need to leave crap alone noone wants to see your dumb self in a historical or rare piece
If you own it do what you want.
What you simply don't do is tell others what to do
And also, it's not like that at all.
The owner of the dress wanted her to wear it. You don't get a say. Get over it
does she have the rights to do whatever she wants with the dress once she has bought it? yes. Should she have been able to buy it in the first place? hell na
If she can afford it then she has the right to buy it.
@@DiamondNYC exactly. denying someone the right to buy something perfectly legal because you dont like them isnt how it works
@@DiamondNYC this person wasn't saying she has no rights to buy it, they're saying it shouldn't have been for sale in the first place
@@rathyio who was doing that?
@@ughicanteven5896 i never said doing, im saying people are implying they shouldnt be sold to her.
People need to stop selling/ letting the Kardashians borrow things
Oml fr
It's not borrowing
Not to Borrow is absolutely correct. Let them sell the piece. But they should not lend out museum pieces! Isn't that what a museum is for - preservation? Not ruination?
people need to stop keeping these people popular altogether
Kim Kardashian is a whole billionaire she is paying these Institutions big bucks, so quit blaming them, go find a corner to cry at😭😭😭
Id be more forgiving if it at least looked good on her. But it doesn't.
Just a simple tip, you see Kim wanting a dress, just run.
Ban her from the shops/museums
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Lol. I know what you mean but there's reallly no need to run. For once, people just need to kindly but firmly use the word "NO" with Kim! It's that simple.
The problem is not Kim here. It's the people who are selling off these rare pieces of art to her.
I think that some museums are maybe low on funds and these rich people take advantage of that by offering big money.
It's all about money.
It's both. How is she not at all a problem?
EDIT: Since there are a lot of idiots in the comments replying the exact same "it's her dress" let me clear up some things
1. Yeah, it's her dress so she can be held responsible for what she does to it.
2. I don't have to respect or like what she did just because she can legally do it. I think it was distasteful and dumb.
3. My comment is a reply, in response to someone saying its entirely the museum's fault.
Her fault to. For buying them. She should knew there not toys
Someone who buys drugs from a dealer is still wrong, sure the person who sold them is at fault but so is the person who bought them. Same thing here
I think the saddest thing with Marilyn is having Hugh Hefner being buried next to her when she despised him.
Me too. She didn’t want to be the first playmate. He used her. And then buried himself next to her. It takes the term “do anything for clout” to a whole new level. He tied his name to hers and rode that wave into the afterlife. He was a predator.
Yikes
Not just "next to her". On top of her. Face down too I believe. Marilyn cannot rest in peace and it crushes me.
That's disturbing. Hefner was a depraved individual.
wait really?? ew wtf why can’t people just let her rest in peace???? like jfc she was tortured and treated horribly enough when she was alive
Imagine buying a john william waterhouse and then painting a bbl onto the girl 😂 literally whyyyy
Fire the people who r selling her these damn dresses 🧑🏽🦱
So now people are not allowed to sell and buy what they want. Stop with your Socialist ideas.
i legit thought u meant burn them at first
@@idonthavegoodhumor it was optional
Imagine getting mad about others property 💀
@@davidesezobor7022 who’s mad
Don’t want someone to alter a historical dress? Don’t sell them off.
We aren't the ones selling it tho
@Pipa Apin your case, no one is to be blamed. Kim wanted a dress, the museum wanted the money.
@@sunflowr393 cause ur all too poor
@@vay908 seriously lol people are haters
@@vay908 no, its cause we got no business even owning it
I'm upset with her and the people who sold it to her. It's like giving art to a toddler and expecting it not to be ruined at this point.
Unfortunately people with money can do whatever they want
Throwing art into a trash box
Yep
Yes, be upset with your first world problems. It's not like there's people out there who are still dying from tuberculosis and curable diseases. But yeah you put your foot down over us a piece of cloth. It's the under the world.
Y’all need to stop she bought it she wanted to wear it her style it’s their dress but her style you can’t force Someone to copy someone else’s style
Tell her NO!
it fully shows that her love for fashion comes from vanity rather than passion for the art of it
Yes
Well said!
she’s so obviously doing this for attention
@@lindseyhoule9679What has she done? I'm clueless. How did she destroy one of Marilyn's dresses? Amalia.
and that’s okay!
I think she feels extremely special when she wears these dresses no one else can, that's why she is willing to destroy these pieces of history, just to feed her own ego and self-importance.
She's a Narcissist, don't ever forget that.
I agree
She thinks of herself too highly there was this podcast in which Kanye says that Kim is modern day marilyn. Kim is absolutely vain yeah she’s a billionaire and really made her way but her attitude is horrible
I guess my comment was not popular because you don't know what a Narcissist is 😂
It’s just a piece of clothing, calm down
It's not completely her fault, it's the museums who let them buy or borrow these dresses.
Agree.
they didn’t buy the one from the museum, it’s still there
This is HER dress though. She can do exactly what she wants with it
What is wrong with you people. She needs to think she can ruin whatever she wants she thinks she is special she only got famous for her Sex tape and being half naked and so much fake in her body....no respect
Ikr precious stuff like these should not be for sale
they don't call them the KarTRASHians for nothing
She has all the money and resources to replicate these dresses to her exact measurements 😭😭😭
Why would she do that when she can have what she wants. The entitlement and tone deafness of rich people is astounding.
THIS.
Fr.. She needs too atop buying these.. They are historical items.. 😭
No youre not able to repare the marilyn dress because the fabric isnt made anymore..also you alter it! Shes a pig for that..
I mean why are people selling these "timeless peices of art" to her? This one honestly i dont understand the significance. It was made by a designer and theres just 2. Thats its. Its rare sure but in the end its art thats meant to be worn. She had it altered to fit her its not destroyed
“Kim Kardashian buys the Mona Lisa for her kids. Now it’s unrecognizable!”
It now has False eyelashes and humongous hips
😭😭 I am dead
Is it sad I can see that happening
@@kaylanewis5392 and the worst part...
It has eyebrows!
(Sorry if this is offensive to some people)
@Kaien good to know money can't buy everything
The fact she was given permission to ruin the Monroe dress is what pisses me off…
Exactly! Like, yeah Kim is acting hella weird by ruining massive pieces of recent history, but who the hell is selling these things to her or the person who bought these things for her, like… they’re enabling them to pull these sort of stunts!
She DID IN FACT have a recreation with her exact measurements of the Marilyn Monroe dress, but decided las minute to just wear the actual dress. The outrage is not just that the museum lent her the dress, but apparently they did so because she PROMISED them that she only wanted it to make a faithful replica, and obviously LIED.
She bought it, so it's within her own legal rights to do so, and many people should not really care THAT much about a stupid dress. After all, how would it even slightly affect ur life????
@@Thecouncil__1 Imagine dying. Imagine watching people take what you loved and wore, and then wearing it out, ruining it, and then calling you fat because they couldn't fit in YOUR clothes. Shall I just destroy a statue of Christopher Columbus? I mean, we would have found out about America anyways, so he wouldn't be that important, yeah? He just happened to stumble across it, and now we celebrate a day dedicated to him. Unlike Marilyn, his belongings were put in a museum.
I've gone a bit far with this I have to admit, but I'm pretty damn sure you wouldn't want people messing with and breaking your stuff.
Why do people keep saying she ruined the Marilyn dress? How did she ruin it exactly? Because if you watch the episode where she wears it, you can see how meticulous she is about preserving it in its original state.
If this woman thinks that wearing iconic dresses will bring her more fame, she is SO wrong.
Oh it brings her fame for sure. It's negative publicity that's all. But her fame certainly increases 😢
@@ShriyaditaSS after all, bad publicity is still publicity and we can do nothing about that my friend.
@@Kpopobssesed476 Exactly
@@ShriyaditaSSWhich is EXACTLY why she does it ! ! !
She didn’t “allegedly” ruin Marilyn Monroe’s dress, she full on ruined it
ok but y’all didn’t even care abt the dress until she wore it. nobody even knew the damn dress existed. y’all just want to hate for no reason
Her out of proportion figure sure pops those seams. 😂
@@noladelrusso7614Dude, even my country bumpkin USSR remembering grandma KNOWS about the diamond dress. It's a historical artifact, period.
@@noladelrusso7614I'm a fan of Marilyn Monroe, and knew of the Diamond Dress. I grew up watching her old films and singing her old songs. I even have a blue dress similar to that in Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (mine is much easier to walk in...lol). Many of her styles were used by dollmakers - Barbie being one - Bob Mackie has multiple limited editions with Barbie. If you look at the Jem and the Holograms line, there were many influences in colour palette, and designs.
The Oyster dress is horrendously ugly. I know that McQueen "pushed boundaries" of fashion, but it's inelegant despite the meaning of it being a "female warrior emerging from beneath the battered shell".
I also fail to see why no-one has mentioned the first owner, Angie Barrett, who wore the dress to The (Beaux) Art Ball at Cannes FF in 2003.
Despite not being a fan of the Kardashians, WHY is everyone obsessing over a dress from the 2020 oscars?
At the Met Gala, KK changed into the gown in a dressing room at the bottom of the steps, and then into a replica of the Diamond dress for the remainder of the event.
On top of that it literally goes against Monroes wishes of never having anyone wear the dress. Absolutely disgusting
Remember kids, just because you CAN doesnt mean you SHOULD
I can and i will
-Mr. Goshawk
if i could i would
@@capsnerd Why would you buy a dress to alter it mayorly if you have more then enough money to have that exact design outcome made on personalized size etc by any team of designers. It would similair to me Painting a Japanese anime girl on the Nachtwacht from Van Gogh if I would be able to pay for the said painting
That way of thinking has been thrown out. Now everybody’s acting crazy.
Hell, if I had the money to afford that, you better believe I’m squeezing myself into that dress. Life is too short to be wondering about what makes other people angry
She is the embodiment of "you cannot buy class with money".
@@chankero4776 especially cause she is the ugliest on the inside.
If you start your career with porn, there is no hope of gaining class.
She has more class then you ever will 😅😂😂
@@THEECLECTICHIPPYWITCH Sure honey..keep dreaming...
@@THEECLECTICHIPPYWITCHboy she did porn…..there was no class from the start😂 im sure her father is rolling over in his grave
It’s honestly gross. She destroyed the Marilyn Monroe dress and and then altered another incredibly famous dress. The fact she thinks she has the right to do this is shocking to me
PEOPLE
It’s not about the clothes, it’s about the disrespect for the original artist. It’s like buying a famous painting to paint over it. Some clothes aren’t actually meant to be worn, some are specifically designed to be art pieces. And yea, Marilyn didn’t want anyone else to wear that dress, so we should respect her wishes. It was her property, and she should be able to control what happens to it.
Issue is, when you’re dead, what you want stops mattering 😢
Ikrr
Its like if i bought the mona lisa just to paint over it and make it look like my face, not okay at all
😂😂😂
Plus it was custom to Marilyn's body. Now it's torn. Ruined. You wouldn't buy a dress in that condition at a thrift shop.
If she didn't want it worn she should've put it on her will. Not being an asshole but being legit. Most famous people have wills early for these types of things
Honestly we need to start putting the accountability in the person who landed her the dress. Like how can this keep happening?
She BOUGHT the dress, the dress is HERS. The Marilyn Monroe dress however, that dress shouldn’t even been landed to her.
@@TheLastEgg08 Barista Plus Even if she did own Marilyns dress
Even though it's within her right
Ethically speaking is it ethical
fr bro. i was mad at marilyn dress, who the hell landed it to her? they must’ve been the one who got blamed for her ruining the dress.
however, this dress was her. different cases. she can do anything with this dress whether you like it or not.
@@TheLastEgg08 I get it tbh I didn't watch the end saying it was bought.
But if it's something valuable like a collectors item or something historical, even if it's yours, it's not nice to destroy it. Or, as someone said, it's not ethical. (That's why museums just don't break historic pieces)
I think of it as belonging to the society if when the owner (Kim) dies the item will be going to a museum.
But again, she didn't ""destroy"" it, she wore it - with that giant butt of hers 😂. I still think ppl need to stop selling/lending/letting her breathe near iconic clothes.
She won't take no for an answer she's as entitled as it gets. With Marilyn's dress she said she made her mum go and demand it when they wouldn't give it to her. They use their connections
It's the fact that she can literally hire an entire team to recreate any garment for her but she still chooses to damage originals 😤
Okay maybe I'm wrong here but wouldn't that be plagiarism? Art theft? Like with this newest piece, idk how the designer would have felt about her knocking it off and then wearing it on the red carpet. I grasp the issue here, I'm just saying that idk if art theft is really the answer? Especially as a celebrity who can afford originals
Lol can you imagine the backlash she'd get if she just ripped off a design like that? Lol!
I dont think you know the consequences of stealing an original design 💀 girl that's not how things work
How does that harm ur home?
@@saragupta1638 stop trolling and get a life, sick of seeing your ugly comments.
"They like, have another one, so?"
🤦♀️
I don't know why she bought the second oyster dress and then paid a 3rd party to alter it, rather than just getting in contact with the house of Alexander McQueen and getting them to make her one to her measurements. That's literally what couture is, and I can't imagine them refusing to do it for her (or do it for Kanye, on her behalf, seeing as it was a gift).
They probably wouldn’t do that if he made it and he’s gone. The other two lose some of their value.
They wouldn’t have made it because the person who made it is no longer alive. It being archival I am surprised they let her have it. But fashion houses won’t just jump to remake an archival piece for anyone. They may have been okay to make something similar, but archival pieces hold their worth because they are never remade.
I read “couture” in rarity’s voice 😀
It wouldn't be the same dress even if they made. AMcQ himself made that
It was a first didnu listen to the whole video
How about we stop letting celebrities wear historical dresses? It's they're own fault for letting them use it 🤦🏻♀️
Especially since she kills the beauty if these iconic dresses
Maybe because the dress only became historical because of the celebrity who wore it? If the designer makes a dress then hangs it on a wall and declares it his master piece do you really think it will become "art" that has everyone talking.
Kim needs to NOT touch priceless pieces of clothing that cannot be fixed. Just hire someone to make a dupe. She has enough money
It’s hers. And it’s not priceless, cause they bought it.
@@lauriehand1021She ruined it
it is not the original so what is the point...that´s how her brain works. she needs to be stopped by the people who give it to her.
People are dying in the world..
if i had money like that why get a fake like , it like having the money to buy Gucci but instead of buying Gucci u spend it on fake Gucci like bffr
Nobody should be allowed to have these iconic dresses! Museum was stupid to allow KK to even wear Marilyn’s dress!!! That was one of a kind- she destroyed it! I don’t care how much $$ they paid to “ borrow” or buy that Oyster dress😮Hate me if you like - I could care less! RIP Marilyn ❤👵
At this point just put a sign up on art and say, "DON'T WEAR IT, ESPECIALLY KIM KARDASHIAN"
who gives a fuck tho
Marilyn Monroe said numerous times she didn't want anyone wearing her clothes after she died and that didn't stop Kim Kardashian because she fundamentally doesn't care
…“But no amount of vintage dresses gives you dignity”
THINK ABOUT WHAT YOU DID 👹
YES!!
She's not a saint and she's not what you think... she's an actress
Suits her tho😂❤
@@sunaynadeepaksingh8513 she is better known for the things she does on the mattress...
She shouldn't have been able to own the dress in the first place, it should have been in a museum or something. We need to stop letting rich people do whatever tf they want just because they can pay outrageous amounts to do it.
They do these outrageous and destructive things with tax money that they bilked the USA government out of. Now us normal citizens live with homelessness messes and crime because there isn’t money to take care of these sad vulnerable people. Every person in the bottom 50% of income pays a higher tax rate than her or any billionaire
Fr. With the Marilyn Monroe dress, they shouldve laughed her out of the building. But instead they went along with her idea
@@s.a.munknown4300 Exactly 💯
Like there's a Tesla parked on what planet ? Whatever happened to having a moral compass? Filthy Rich projecting their filthy ways. SMH. 😔✌️❤️🦋🙏
😂😂 it’s a dress. Why shouldn’t she be able to own it?
Its not like its stolen art from colonized countries
Nor is it sacred burial grounds
There’s already one in the museum.
Ur focused on the wrong thing.
It doesn't matter if you have the physique that is suitable for the dress. If not don't ruin dresses.😭
As a casual fashion history nerd, my heart BROKE when I heard about Marilyn’s dress.
It wasn't ruined at all.
@@kayladonnrichardson7384yes it is the seam is stretched alot of the jewels are falling off. Look up before and after pics
@@kayladonnrichardson7384 yes is was damaged. It had rips and seems torn. That’s considered ruined to me.
I watched their show. She didn't do anything to it. She couldn't zip it up, so she altered her own spanx and jazzed it up to blend in with the dress, so the dress was open at the back what we were actually seeing at the back was a modified spanx!
😂😂😂 sad
She should buy a dress that's been made to suit her body and not try to squeeze inside someone else's dress that's been made for their body type. RIP the Legendary dresses
I agree she is thick to large for that style
Frrr her hips are too big for little dresses
@@lydiaparker6731 it is her butt implants that is the problem, she buys iconic dresses and ruins them with her distorted figure.
exactly, it’s doesn’t fit her plastic body
She didnt actually squeezed in, she altered it.
Narcissists ruin everything. Wedging herself into and tearing Marilyn’s gown was grossly disrespectful.
No it's not she has every right to do whatever she bloody well wants with her clothes it's not up to you
@THEWEIRDOGOTHVAMPYREWITCH Except it wasn’t her dress. It was Marilyn Monroe’s she altered the ICONIC dress of a deceased woman, and if I’m not mistaken Marilyn explicitly didn’t want anyone to wear that dress. Because Kim had it in her possession suddenly her words don’t matter? Or is it because Marilyn’s dead?
It sickens me that she desecrated Marilyn’s dress!!! How disrespectful and disgusting! Then after her fans were outraged, she does it again with another dress!!! She has enough money to have any dress designed for her and only her, but she continues to ruin iconic dresses for others!!!😡
She never teared the dress, she wore it and was wearing the dress with caution. Get your facts right
@@Siddy_slothOfficailMarilyn explicitly said her dress shouldnt be worn, are you going against a deceased legend’s words who SPECIFICALLY said it?
"And fans are furious!"
.....fans?
It seems like the people selling the dress to her and giving her access to Marilyn’s dress don’t see these items the same way the public does.
Exactly. I found out no one, not even the museum was upset. It’s just people finding an outlet to hate.
@Trinity M exactly
Their pov:💰💰💵💵
They got no respect they only care about the money
What will she do next? Draw a mustache on the Mona Lisa, maybe?
or turn starry night into a purse
Bro it's an dress calm down 🤓... Whyyy like whyyy everyone is so sad like someone who was owner of the dress sell this dress to her and as a owner she have fully right to do whatever she want...like why why everyone is so furious... it's just an dress😭
@@sahista4432 girl its literally putting disrespect on the original designer's name and alot more stuff that you wouldn't understand anyways💀
@@athena4658I get why your mad but if the original designer of the dress passes it down to someone, and THEY decide to sell it to Kim, it's not narcissistic... It feels wrong to you but at the same time, she didn't ruin it. She is gifted it. Just because it has a history doesn't mean it's untouchable. If you want to wear it, you have to pay for it. If Kanye gave you a dress to wear why would you not wear it? I know some people have possessions ripped away from them but Kim is not at fault. She literally just bought an expensive and historical dress. It's dumb to hate HER more than any of the resellers who want to give it away 💀
@@hueningpieim with you i dont get it either. Ohhh but the dress has a meaningful story and the designer... dude if the thing is so important why is it being sold to whoever 😅 if you made something that shouldnt be changed sell it to collectors. If i paid for something its my right to wear it to tear it to burn it if i want to thats the point of OWNING something, it gives you the right.
Rich people should not be allowed within 100 feet of culturally significant items unless they’re the one that made it culturally significant
Your statement is correct, however this is what rich people have done throughout all of history: plundering artifacts that do not belong to them and then act like they own or discovered them. Most of the British monarchy crown jewels were obtained in this fashion.
What about Lizzo and the Crystal Flute
@@Kikobekillinit Lizzo was given permission *by* the owners of the crystal flute, and had the necessary background to treat the flute with respect and Did so. That's way different.
@@ohokay4663 yes and that is why today I am making an example out of this comment as to why “blanket statements” for opinions are kind of like, moot.
@@ohokay4663 based on the logic of OPs comment, it’s still not ok for Lizzo to be near the flute.
She does it PRECISELY to create outrage + make people talk! How can you not see that?! She does it every year!
This is a deeper problem of thinking money gives you access to everything, even priceless art.
Well.... Doesn't it?
Thinking correctly in this case
It literally does you bozo
I mean, money did give her access to it
@@mariabilkhan no.🥴
I cannot believe i have to say this, but this is HER dress. If she wants to alter it/ruin it/set it on fire, she has the right to do so. It belongs to her
Yep, she simply tailored the dress to fit her, something done all the time.
One could argue this is more about who did it rather than what was done.
Literally not to mention she wore this dress like 3 yrs ago in 2020 when she was still married to kanye
Exactly, she owns it, so why ppl.. Let the woman be
It was a piece of history first and if she is allowed to ruin it, people are allowed to be upset about it. The generations of the future will never appreciate it the same.
yeah legally… if i buy the mona lisa and eat it, legally i’m in my rights but it’s still ethically gray lol
The amount of disrespect
It just feels like a statement of entitlement and selfishness to permanently alter a prolific dress permanently
it’s amazing how she makes these super expensive and rare dresses look so cheap
Plastic does that to a lot of stuff
Ikr, kim looks like a mummy, toilet paper roll in that oyster dress
They’re just fabric and clothes calm down
do u rly think that, or are you just an untouched womanhating incel
Ok I'm glad it wasn't just me. I was like 'That's not the Oyster Dress, the Oyster Dress is absolutely stunning...and that's a Mummy cosplay." But then it is. And I dont understand what she did.
This woman is rich enough to commission an exact replica of these dresses so that they can be preserved and would actually flatter her, but instead she is so full of herself she thinks she deserves to wear the exact originals. This is so ridiculous.
exactly. her body is very different from the measurements of these dresses. She couldn't of been comfortable squeezing in Marilyn Monroe's gown. Nor she would of been comfortable with this one. She could of had her own "Swan dress" moment and have something made that fits her perfectly, and steal the show with how drop dead gorgeous it is.
This!!
What’s ridiculous is y’all crying over a piece of fabric
@@H3llo- Something tells me you don't sew.
@@zombiedoggie2732 something tells me y’all are too sensitive
I read savage beauty, a book showing several of mcqueens creations and this one made me actually cried
The best way to deal with Kim and Co is to ignore them and hopefully they will go away.
That could work or they could also do something even more outragious for attention
Can we just stop giving away priceless art pieces for the right dollar sign? This is ridiculous
You know their kind, throwing away any sense of integrity for a few extra shekles of silver
Especially to so undeserving people
So disappointing to hear that Kim. If the dress don’t fit you don’t force it, just to show off to Hollywood
The McQueen gown doesnt even suit her frame or look good on her. What a waste. Kim is a clown.
I feel like because she has a fake hourglass body because of the surgery’s she thinks she could fit into anything and that makes me mad 😠
@@jab20243 But that dress isnt even made for an hour glass figure. Its made to drape, not be snug tight. The whole effect is lost on Kim Kardashian. She makes an exquisite couture dress look like its off the rack from Top Shop. 🤮
💀 she can have it if she wants not like god made it and has magic powers 🙄 Mf your sensitive
@@susiex6669 🙄 girl shut up not even you can afford the dress
SHE’S GETTING CANCELED WITH THIS ONE🔥🔥🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥
She didn’t allegedly ruin Marilyn Monroe’s dress. She DID ruin Marilyn Monroe’s dress.
No she didn't she lost 20 lbs to get into the dress. She knew she wouldn't fit in it so she lost the weight to do so. Marilyn wasn't a stick thin girl either.
@icy. hot. yes this is the truth
@@christineperez7562 what the hell is she losing? She got ribs taken out, ffs. She doesn't have weight anymore, only plates sculpting her "body"
@@christineperez7562 total BS.
Marilyn Monroe is a beautiful Hollywood actress who's influence will be around for generations to come. Kim Kardashian has permanently destroyed part of the actress's soul by selfishly slashing the dress and maker's legacy just to fit her silicone hips.
no one, and i mean NO ONE looks better than marilyn when wearing her iconic dress.
And no one ever will!!!
@mistybollinger3312 lol Kim will NEVER be as beautiful,classy,and iconic as Marilyn was and it kills her!!!! I love it. Marilyn is queen forever and always
Truly.
What clothes the body is irrelevant. It is what dresses the heart and soul that identifies character.
As a fashion, history, art, and costuming person, this hurts so bloody much
That sounds like a personal problem
I am curious, which one is in the wrong? Kim and Kanye for buying then altering their dress, or the people that sold them the dress?
don't mean to attack I just really want to know since you actually study this field (as a business student I have no idea)
What's bad about altering the dress?
@@suelviadomingos5411 both
The business shouldn’t sell it that gown is a very unique piece of art
And Kim and Kanye shouldn’t have bought it
Although since they bought it they have all the rights to the dress
Hence the business is more in the wrong
But if on the other hand Kim should still respect the piece even if it’s legally her dress
@@Imdrunk_ if there are 2 of them, one of them is a reproduction and the only reason they make so few is to sell exclusivity and increase the price tag but the dress was always meant to be worn. If designers don't sell they won't be able to make more iconic pieces. I don't think it's anyone's business to say what a brand should and shouldn't do with their own stuff
Can we make the MMOA swear under oath to never let her touch Dior’s Venus and Junon?
YESS LITERALLY
You know the next Met is Karl Lagerfeld themed so let’s see what timeless and irreplaceable Chanel dress she’ll slaughter for that occasion. I can hear Karl turning in his grave just thinking about it.
@@claracatlady9844 Maybe the Smithsonian will let her borrow Jackie O’s pink Chanel suit… ugh I am terrible for even joking.
I mean they paid for the oyster dress so they cab do what they want....
I wonder how long she’ll hold off ruining a Vivian Westwood Haute Couture piece now she’s passed away
It is her dress so she can technically alter it but she shouldn't have been able to buy it.
Well when people have enough money they can kinda basically have anything they want remember everyone has a right price and that museum probably did to 🤷
AGREED
Fr like. Mf so what if only a couple were made. They were made to be worn. And if someone buys one, then it's yours. What? She's gonna buy a dress and store it away forever so it can slowly wither away? Leave her be
@@pfc_escalante …… excuse me.. are you I.. I can’t comprehend what you just said. Either you don’t give a crap about history of any kind or you’re outright stupid
@シAva well then read it again so you can comprehend it. This comment is not for people who are emotionally triggered.
Its just a dress at the end of the day. And its hers, why do people care so much.
We as a society need to stop making these people famous. Don’t watch their shows, don’t buy their merchandise. Don’t buy magazines with them in it, don’t click on articles about them. They will eventually go away and stop being a cold sore on society.
Yep I totally agree. Marilyn Monroe unlike her had true talent and had an enormous IQ (which sadly is not that well known about her.) Kim K is a self absorbed talentless reality star who is only famous for inherited wealth, a sex tape, and a failed marriage to a rapping Nazi lover. You only need money and a night vision nudie to get famous in the country.
It's unfortunate that in America our attention span is getting smaller and smaller that thoughtless and talentless people can be famous for no true merit.
YES
Very true 👏
Yes 👍
It's just sad that Fashion history isn't taken as seriously as other works of art just because it's girly
Just wait till she gets her hands on the Mona Lisa. Then everyone will finally realize the menace they created.
It's just sad you think a gown rotting in a museum is being taken seriously.
@@anthonymcneil4238You could say that about anything that's stored in a museum, paintings being rotting wood and fabric, etc., so not an argument to me.
@@gelatinny1089 the issue is, Paintings are supposed to be looked at, garments are made to be worn.
What’s “art” in that thing Kim is wearing tho? Looks like a curtain attacked by a cat.
What pisses me off more is that Kim already had a replica of Marilyn's dress made. Yet she still chose to wear the original that was too small on her and completely stretch it out. If Kim's rich enough to have someone make a replica of Marilyn's dress for her. She can also have a replica oyster dress made specially for her, there's no reason for her to be wearing/ruining historical pieces when she can have a replica made.
She didn't Ruin the real thing and he wore the replica a majority of the night. She o lying wore the real thing to walk up the stairs. Also the owners of the dress recently had it on display at a convention in Florida and publicly said Kim DIDN'T RUIN the dress.
@@andrerwhaag2734 its still disrespectful af. Marilyn specifically said she didn’t want anyone else to wear it but for some reason these celebrities have a hard time staying behind the boundary.
It would be like buying a one of a kind original painting, then painting on it to suit you. You could have just bought a replica.
@@andrerwhaag2734yes she did for the love of god Kim got to many damn plastic surgery’s for that dress don’t lie to yourself
@@Madii_78 she’s dead get over it ☠️
Her exhusband had bought this one for her as a gift. People are allowed to wear their own clothes. Many people wear and alter vintage clothes. Though she did not own the Marilyn Monroe dress, it was archived, thats why it's so sad it was harmed.
The problem is that this woman can make a better replica of any ever existed dress but she proceeds to destroy the originals.
She bought the dress, she is well within her rights to alter it to fit her size
@@nehalmahajan9544 would you say that about someone who cut down a Dali or a Banksy to fit over thier fireplace.
@@nehalmahajan9544 im gonna buy a lion and alter it to fit me just right :)
The Marilyn Monroe one was a replica, and again this dress was gifted to her
@@nehalmahajan9544 i buy the mona lisa and im gonna vandalise it for an occasion
she literally has enough money to make EXACT replicas of all these dresses she’s destroying like i just don’t understand
because then she wouldnt get attention.
as the person in the video said, it was a gift from Kanye I wonder if half of you people in the comments actually listen.
It's because you're not a narcissist.
@@shittypoopkiller Same thing, he could have got her one made. They're both egotistical narcissists who thrive on attention.
@@chicka-chickaslimcheyney2914 don't give it to em then,everyone here is giving them what they want, then telling me im defending them cause i told them to stop caring for what ppl do with the shit the bought. everyone doesn't realize their the reason to why they are this way, quit giving them attention.
I'm so disappointed... How is it possible that you can destroy history just because you have money. I'm really mad at the people who agreed giving her the dress...
The thing is: She (or maxbe Kayne) bought it. It belongs to her. It may upset people but she can do what she wants with it. And it is a dress... it is meant to be worn even if it is haute couture. The same thing with the Monroe dress. She payed to rent it. It's Ripley's that decided that this is a good idea.
And Kim get's all the media intention every time. It totally works for her.
The Problem is that these iconic dresses should never be able to be bought for no amount of 💰 money..
FR
That's...what brands expect though??? To sell their designs. Do you think they just spend millions on designs and fashions shows just for the heck of it? She is a public figure but the haute couture industry caters to an existing customer range... that buy clothes.
she bought the dress and made it to her size, it's the fundamental job of a haute couture atelier to do that for their client. I know it can infuriate some people but it is what it is
Ugly dress anyway.
Everything costs money 😅
As long as people keep letting her get away with it, it will never end.
I grew up in a historical area and if you bought a historical house you are allowed to live in it but you couldn’t do things like renovate or tear out the original flooring I feel like this falls under that category
Exactly, like rules like that should exist. Also, may I ask where do you live?
There are lots of places like that. If that makes someone happy good for them. I would never live in a historical home. I want my home to reflect me.
And in the end we can't freeze frame life and turn everything into something historical that can't be touched.
She don't Care who or what the meaning behind the story is or the history is just as long as she is the center of attention PERIOD
I don't get why she can't just ask someone to make an exact replica of the iconic dresses she wants to wear instead of ruining them...
kanye bought her this as a gift
EXACTLY !!!!!!!!!
@@plsbuffme5470 so? She still chose to wear and ruin it.
She thinks wearing these dresses will make her someone other than herself like it'll give her life some meaning or some shit.
@@mariakhan7986 who gives af? Her husband bought it for her as a gif
What do you expect? She knows the price of everything and value of nothing.
Exactly. She has enough money & fame to get just about whatever she wants
That is a perfect description of her. I get so tired of hearing about those people. They're trash, through and through. Add Bruce Jenner to the mix, and damn.
very well said... furthermore, you can't buy class or sense... clearly!
It honestly looks like cow lining
Agreed. Zero class or grace.
Bro someone needs to stop giving this woman pieces of timeless art to wear
She technically bought them?
yeah i dont want timeless arts to associate with her.
She didn’t destroy any dress other than this one that she owns
I don't like Kim but I'm going to be fair with my opinion. she literally owns it. She has the right to do anything to this dress now because it's HER dress now.
What can a poor like you can do to support this so called art?
She did not wear the dress from the Smithsonian, the one she tried to wear is from Ripley's Orlando ( couldnt get it over her hips) after making a charitable donation and she wore a replica in the end.
Legally she can do what she wants, but from a moral standpoint, she's ruining pieces of history
There is another in a museum. The history is there.
@Malhadado Epígono | Daybreak twins are people dresses are not, hope that helps
@@nm9688 it’s still the same principal tho
@@wayverleesoulsong It's really not
Well if the people are upset about this being legally allowed to happen then protest until a law is created that preserves museum artifacts and prevents anyone from buying the original.
She thinks she can 'squeeze' in to any dress (her own words). Someone tell her she can't 😅
you do it then, dont let someone else do your dirty work
Thats why she altered that dress so she can fit right thru it...
@@donatella5409 its just a dress
@@kittendrawsthingz yea a dress that only 2 in the world exists
@@donatella5409 yeah, so its just a dress. The other one is still in a museum so get over it, its not even your dress. And the "damage" has already been done so unless u wanna hire someone to steal the damn dress from her...