Great topic! The funny thing about the term "cigarette burn" - it was a term invented by Fight Club. In the projectionist industry they're just called cue marks or change over cues ;)
+Joshydmanx Laserdisc had digital audio available, but the video was analog which is why the discs were so big and could only fit 1hr or 30 min per side.
Wow, you just read my mind, exactly yesterday I was thinking of getting the remastered Star Trek TNG series, asking myself what exactly did they do with the remaster and if it is worth it... and I get up this morning with you explaining what remastering is !!!! PS. Linus, can you connect me to some studios who can remaster my home cinema Super 8's ?
You don't cut down the aspect ratio, because that increases film grain, which then lowers the picture quality and means more work to remove it. Watch Filmmaker IQ's episode about aspect ratios for more on this.
It's quite different for Audio... Mastering in modern audio is (mostly) the matching of perceived volume to make all the songs in an album to sound similarly loud. Volume wars and all that jazz.
What did Linus mean at 2:30 when he said that aspect ratios are at "16:9 for now... anyway". Is he merely implying that things change, or is there currently a push to change the industry standard?
usually this involves post processing techniques. in the case of audio, which is the field i am more confident about it goes throughout restoration, and high quality analogue and digital post processing. in the case of audio, it can involve compression, eq, limiting, but also post-processing, such as reverbs, delays, etc., etc., and re-treating the spatialisation features of the many multi-channel formats. in the case of video, you are right, color correction, etc.
in audio engineering mastering is the part that is adjusting the levels of different sources, so that you can hear evrything, and nothing is to loud. a remaster would me redoing this process, often it is simply giving it a boost in the low-mid range of tones, tho...
+zakizdaman That's often the other way around. At least for older stuff. They compress the hell out of newer prints of things so they sound louder but have fuck all dynamic range. I'm thankful to have a 1984 print of the Thriller album as each successive re-release of it has been more and more brick walled.
Linus good video just wanted to say I work in this industry making CD and DVD masters as well as CD and DVD r and making CD and DVD stampers fun to see something I can relate to
In the case of animated movies, take Toy Story for example, what they’ll do is update the textures (Image files that makes up the look, sort of like paint) to match the higher resolution, and slightly modify the models (Basically a 3D object that ultimately makes up the shape of the object, like a 3D model lamp.) to give them more fine edges so that when viewed on a higher-res display, the choppy looking model wouldn’t stick out like a sore thumb. And of course, everything else that was mentioned in this video.
From what I understand, on some instances, remastering is just a fancy word for rendering. They just re-render the movie in HD so that it looks better than if they were going to use an old source.
I remember seeing the blu ray of ghostbusters years ago and it said right on the cover "taken from a 4k remaster!" I understood blu ray as 1080P and found that confusing. In other words, its a fancy way of saying they used a new 4k scan to make the blu ray. While the blu ray wasnt 4k the source was, ensureing best picture possible. Ive also seen remastering of tv shows as well. It all depends how it was done: on flim or tape. Tape is a tv raster and while AI can make it 8k its only as good as the source its taken from.
The process of film remastering includes scanning the original film with a telecine, then restoration, then color grading with tools like Resolve, then audio cleanup and enhancement.
+Chris Cunningham Indeed. It's a shame about season two though. It was kind of... not the same standard. They gave that to another team with the intention of spending twice as long per season by splitting up the task. You can see the fruits of this with season three, it looks fucking amazing! Especially the first episode. The rest was done by CBS so the amazing quality returned for the remaining seasons. Not that season two was that bad, just not quite as well done as the others.
TalesOfWar Season 4 was outsourced to another company, luckily, they did a much better job, but still not CBS Digital quality. CBS was really pissed about how season 2 turned out, apparently the company had the audacity to ask for more money and it would do better next time. In the end, CBS Digital did seasons 1, 3, 5-7. HTV did season 2, Modern Videofilm did season 4.
***** Modern Videofilm did a good job with 4. I didn't know they outsourced that too, I thought it was just 2. I'm just wondering how well the rest would have turned out if they had as long to spend on them as they did for 3. I was genuinely shocked (in a good way) when I saw the opening episode of that season and how it looked more like a film than a TV show. The whole thing impressed me really, you never realised just how much detail they put into those sets in previous releases and TV play.
TalesOfWar Yea, season 2 and 4 were outsourced. Of course, for _Best of Both Worlds, Part 2_ in season 4, CBS Digital did that too, to maintain quality consistency, but from _Family_ to _In Theory_ it was MVF, CBS Digital picked back up on the last episode _Redemption, Part 1_ of season 4 and did every season after that. :) Yea, the opening shot in "Evolution" made my jaw drop compared to the original composite, with the way the blues from the warp engines now play with the red-orange lighting of the star, it's very nice.
Noticed your "for now" in reference to 16x9 aspect ratio. You should do a tech quickly on history of aspect ratios standards and future standard projections.
I would've thought Linus would make a Fight Club reference by pointing up and to his left, and the editor would put a cigarette burn on the top-left of the video.
Ok, so I know this video is almost 5 years old but do you guys know any of the programs used to "remaster" movies? I've been wanting to work with this for a while and lately I've started working a project to remaster some old shows openings (like Star Trek DS9 or Stargate Atlantis) but I just can't find programs that actually let me enhance the image itself. I've tried using editing programs and scaling programs but didn't get very far...
+Emil Bozhilov Those old films were shot on an actual roll of film. Film's pretty high res, pixel wise it's around 2.5k on smaller rolls, however some can be super high res (like 70mm vistavision/panavision) . Some studios will scan the film and then have a retouching company touch up the scanned images to make them free of specks and dust. Then it's put together again with the new footage/new copy replacing the old copy. Quite expensive, though some historic films have done a beautiful job of being restored - though, they are secrets close to my heart haha. In summary, the studios always had a hi res copy of the film that looked beautiful from since they released the film originally, the problem was that DVD/vhs/laserdisc made it look like crap - now that blu rays exist we can have closer quality to what the master looks like at the comfort of home. It was only the distribution copy that was ugly.
+Emil Bozhilov Back then there were no high res TVs. All TVs had a "resolution" around 800x600. Higher resolution TVs have been affordable for the most buyers maybe from the start of 2000s if even then. Also there were no high capacity mediums. Video tapes would have had to be much larger to record high res footage, for which there really was no need, as no one had the equipment to utilize any higher resolutions. Blu-rays and HD-DVDs were the first to have the required capacity for high res.
Emil Bozhilov because DVD can't store HD. BLU RAY IS a *new technology* ... AND HI RES SCREENS, DISPLAY ETC DIDNT EXIST FOR THE COMPUTER. WITHOUT STEVE JOBS NONE OF THIS FANCY SHIT WOULD EVEN EXIST FOR THE AVERAGE JOE TO EVEN KNOW ABOUT UNLESS THEY WENT TO UNIVERSITY. I accidentally wrote this in caps because after steve jobs died apple updated their keyboard firmware and you have to press the caps lock key for over 10milliseconds for it to register as a keypress, otherwise the press doesn't register. sorry for the caps lock but we need steve jobs back.
Hold down 0, he looks like a hamster eating and making a funny noise. Hold down 1, he's grabbing invisible boobs. Hold down 2, he's dancing! Hold down 3, he's grabbing an invisible butt and repeatedly saying "ass". Hold down 7, Linus is disappointed in you.
Great video, now tell us why the voices and background sounds are never the same volume level with surround sound. aka can't hear the voices but the explosions will launch you from your seat. ;-)
I am really sad when remastering of old black and white movie removes those right corner flashing white dots, which indicated to projectionist that movie reel is on it's end and he must swap next one. It is part of movie history and part of charm of these movies, people who are still watching them don't care or are upset when you do something like that, so don't waste your money and stop doing that, please.
+Andloo Yunty it's 5:4 not 4:3.. the movie resolution back then was 4:3 but 1280x1024 is a 5:4 screen.. i also have still two of those benq 19'' 1280x1024 left and right of my 1920x1080 24'' mainscreen.. still do the job ^^
Lazuardi Mahardika / Alpha X funny thing is that my 19'' 1280x1024 displays have almost the same quality like my 1080p 24'' screen has.. just a little lower in ppi.. but noone was talking about "hd" back in those days as far as i remember..
+Tyler Watthanaphand Video and Audio mastering work exactly the same - you don't master/level to studio grade gear, you master so it looks decent on what 99% of the people own - and they own shittyass TFT panels and Beats by dre.
+Tyler Watthanaphand There is a slight green hue coming from the green screen, called color spill. Most people won't notice because it's ever so slightly green around the edges.
Red Dwarf. Originally, the show was released on VHS. People threw a fit when the show was re-released onto DVDs as "remastered" with no option for it not to be. This in itself would have been fine if they hadn't gone crazy with the cheapass CGI effects overlaying old models. It looked horrible and people complained, so they re-re-released the DVDs on their original forms. Don't mess with Red Dwarf fans. Lol
This generation has been disappointing due to the shear number of remasters there have been. While I like some of these, it stunts the growth of new games and they just seem like a cash grab. Or, you know, you could just play the PC version and get high resolutions and frame rates the first time.
+James Brown Homeworld Remastered bucks this trend. It's worth every penny to get that masterpiece running on modern OS's and looking and sounding as nice as it does. They improved things too like the UI's and used the same ones in both for some level of consistency. It includes the original versions too.
Linus...... please please PLSEEAAASEE review the star wars edition hp laptop pleasee.. it would be amazing to get a your pov on it as im a huge fanboy of star wars and im looking to buy one :) guys please make him notice this plsplspls
3:46 "I can't count very high" Nonono, Linus you mean: "I can't count, very high". It happens to me when I'm high as a kite aswell.
Great topic!
The funny thing about the term "cigarette burn" - it was a term invented by Fight Club. In the projectionist industry they're just called cue marks or change over cues ;)
i first thought this video was about audio engineering :O
No this video is about how a guy sounds when he is on helium
@@blacksun2286 Nahhh, this your first time watching this guy?
LaserDisc is not digital!
I'm pretty sure it is ?
+Joshydmanx It's not google it.
+vwestlife It's optical if I'm not mistaken
Oreo1298PvP
From Wikipedia: "Although appearing similar to compact discs or DVDs, LaserDiscs used *analog* video stored in the composite domain".
+Joshydmanx Laserdisc had digital audio available, but the video was analog which is why the discs were so big and could only fit 1hr or 30 min per side.
Maybe a "PC Master Race as Fast as Possible?" Even if it's just supposed to be a joke.
Wow, you just read my mind, exactly yesterday I was thinking of getting the remastered Star Trek TNG series, asking myself what exactly did they do with the remaster and if it is worth it...
and I get up this morning with you explaining what remastering is !!!!
PS. Linus, can you connect me to some studios who can remaster my home cinema Super 8's ?
What George Lucas did with the original trilogy, holding the unaltered version hostage on the shitty disk type that is DVD, is unforgivable
You sir are right about that.
Yeet
+Senior Steffan What was the difference?
+Senior Steffan You wanted it on Beta Max?
+Eruntien killbane What, the quality of dvd vs blu-ray or the changes made to the trilogy?
That segue into the Freshbooks ad was pretty masterful.
Green screen done right! Can't see any green at all, and the colors on Linus are on point too.
you guys should do a video on aspect ratios. like the history and where it's headed
Homeworld Remastered comes to mind, fantastic work done on that.
You don't cut down the aspect ratio, because that increases film grain, which then lowers the picture quality and means more work to remove it.
Watch Filmmaker IQ's episode about aspect ratios for more on this.
It's quite different for Audio... Mastering in modern audio is (mostly) the matching of perceived volume to make all the songs in an album to sound similarly loud. Volume wars and all that jazz.
+BullHorn May Rick Rubin rot in hell.
007 on blu ray has a pretty good bonus feature showing how they updated their films.
When he mentioned Star Wars when he did, I was surprised to not hear him say something like "Han shot first." Considering the context.
What did Linus mean at 2:30 when he said that aspect ratios are at "16:9 for now... anyway". Is he merely implying that things change, or is there currently a push to change the industry standard?
things change
usually this involves post processing techniques. in the case of audio, which is the field i am more confident about it goes throughout restoration, and high quality analogue and digital post processing. in the case of audio, it can involve compression, eq, limiting, but also post-processing, such as reverbs, delays, etc., etc., and re-treating the spatialisation features of the many multi-channel formats. in the case of video, you are right, color correction, etc.
Can you do a video on tri-band routers?
Dont forget music mastering
in audio engineering mastering is the part that is adjusting the levels of different sources, so that you can hear evrything, and nothing is to loud. a remaster would me redoing this process, often it is simply giving it a boost in the low-mid range of tones, tho...
This has been a rather informative Techquickie, even for the more tech-savvy! Keep it up.
Ohhhhh linus...... so young.....
These segways are too smooth
Mastering: They made everything sound really loud
Remastering: They try and make it not as loud as before
+zakizdaman That's often the other way around. At least for older stuff. They compress the hell out of newer prints of things so they sound louder but have fuck all dynamic range. I'm thankful to have a 1984 print of the Thriller album as each successive re-release of it has been more and more brick walled.
+TalesOfWar my dick is swollen
+Incognito you should get that checked out patch.com/new-jersey/westorange/botched-penis-enlargement-essex-county-woman-pleads-guilty
Very useful and informative video. Thanks
make a video about
refresh rate vs resolution
ex:
1080p,144hz vs 1440p,60hz
Linus good video just wanted to say I work in this industry making CD and DVD masters as well as CD and DVD r and making CD and DVD stampers fun to see something I can relate to
At 2:17, what's "Remasatered Footage"?
+The “David Wang” Tech It's a type of potato salad.
In the case of animated movies, take Toy Story for example, what they’ll do is update the textures (Image files that makes up the look, sort of like paint) to match the higher resolution, and slightly modify the models (Basically a 3D object that ultimately makes up the shape of the object, like a 3D model lamp.) to give them more fine edges so that when viewed on a higher-res display, the choppy looking model wouldn’t stick out like a sore thumb. And of course, everything else that was mentioned in this video.
From what I understand, on some instances, remastering is just a fancy word for rendering. They just re-render the movie in HD so that it looks better than if they were going to use an old source.
Finally someone that explains mastering!
I remember seeing the blu ray of ghostbusters years ago and it said right on the cover "taken from a 4k remaster!" I understood blu ray as 1080P and found that confusing. In other words, its a fancy way of saying they used a new 4k scan to make the blu ray. While the blu ray wasnt 4k the source was, ensureing best picture possible. Ive also seen remastering of tv shows as well. It all depends how it was done: on flim or tape. Tape is a tv raster and while AI can make it 8k its only as good as the source its taken from.
Can you make a "UPS different Types As Fast As Possible" video?
The process of film remastering includes scanning the original film with a telecine, then restoration, then color grading with tools like Resolve, then audio cleanup and enhancement.
A perfect example of superb remastering is what CBS Digital did with Star Trek: The Next Generation.
+Chris Cunningham Indeed. It's a shame about season two though. It was kind of... not the same standard. They gave that to another team with the intention of spending twice as long per season by splitting up the task. You can see the fruits of this with season three, it looks fucking amazing! Especially the first episode. The rest was done by CBS so the amazing quality returned for the remaining seasons. Not that season two was that bad, just not quite as well done as the others.
TalesOfWar Season 4 was outsourced to another company, luckily, they did a much better job, but still not CBS Digital quality.
CBS was really pissed about how season 2 turned out, apparently the company had the audacity to ask for more money and it would do better next time.
In the end, CBS Digital did seasons 1, 3, 5-7. HTV did season 2, Modern Videofilm did season 4.
***** Modern Videofilm did a good job with 4. I didn't know they outsourced that too, I thought it was just 2. I'm just wondering how well the rest would have turned out if they had as long to spend on them as they did for 3. I was genuinely shocked (in a good way) when I saw the opening episode of that season and how it looked more like a film than a TV show. The whole thing impressed me really, you never realised just how much detail they put into those sets in previous releases and TV play.
TalesOfWar Yea, season 2 and 4 were outsourced.
Of course, for _Best of Both Worlds, Part 2_ in season 4, CBS Digital did that too, to maintain quality consistency, but from _Family_ to _In Theory_ it was MVF, CBS Digital picked back up on the last episode _Redemption, Part 1_ of season 4 and did every season after that. :)
Yea, the opening shot in "Evolution" made my jaw drop compared to the original composite, with the way the blues from the warp engines now play with the red-orange lighting of the star, it's very nice.
Noticed your "for now" in reference to 16x9 aspect ratio. You should do a tech quickly on history of aspect ratios standards and future standard projections.
Please do a video about magnetic storage bands like VHS
why did you say 16:9 is the preferred format for now? what would be the new ratio?
4:3 was pretty much the standard for decades before 16:9 rolled around. He assumes that we'll adopt a new standard sometime in the future.
+Kevin Contreras ah okay. i was thinking there might be another on the horizon already
+Kevin Contreras I think it was a poke at Apple. Apple is just starting to go 16:9, but it has been standard for over a decade.
Son of a Zombie Okay, that makes sense.
+Adam Conner
He's probably referring to the ultra-wide 21:9 ratio that some monitors already have.
Dennis raw footage, the real shit.
I would've thought Linus would make a Fight Club reference by pointing up and to his left, and the editor would put a cigarette burn on the top-left of the video.
Do an ASAP of Game HD remake and Remastered please
Mastering songs next?
This video look is so clear. is this just me?
Nice one.
We want more 3x Linus videos.
I'm just happy with my new HDCD of Amarok by MIke Oldfield.
Close Encounters of the Third Kind remastered version is amazing.
What are those "Specialized software"?
Why is dialogue often really quiet on DVDs?
next episode about microphones xlr and audio interfaces :)
Linus as fast a possible
"laser disc or whatever" - Linus 2015
For The Best Darn Screen Protectors Out There......
wait, was Screen Protectors after Darn? Never knew...
Good night to all at Europe
+TheFox720p Thank you! :D Have a great one later on, too. :)
+TheFox720p good night :D
Good nightmares to you too.
+TheFox720p hey thank you!
+TheFox720p hey thanks, just about to go to bed
Gr8 8/8 Segway Linus 👌🏻
I may have done what was exactly described regarding Blade Runner..
does linus not like 16:9? I know he uses those ultra wide monitors.
Ok, so I know this video is almost 5 years old but do you guys know any of the programs used to "remaster" movies? I've been wanting to work with this for a while and lately I've started working a project to remaster some old shows openings (like Star Trek DS9 or Stargate Atlantis) but I just can't find programs that actually let me enhance the image itself. I've tried using editing programs and scaling programs but didn't get very far...
Wow got onto a video pretty early for once!
but how do they make it hd ? How do u take a movie which is really bad quality and make it 1080p bluray quality?
+Emil Bozhilov Those old films were shot on an actual roll of film. Film's pretty high res, pixel wise it's around 2.5k on smaller rolls, however some can be super high res (like 70mm vistavision/panavision) . Some studios will scan the film and then have a retouching company touch up the scanned images to make them free of specks and dust. Then it's put together again with the new footage/new copy replacing the old copy. Quite expensive, though some historic films have done a beautiful job of being restored - though, they are secrets close to my heart haha.
In summary, the studios always had a hi res copy of the film that looked beautiful from since they released the film originally, the problem was that DVD/vhs/laserdisc made it look like crap - now that blu rays exist we can have closer quality to what the master looks like at the comfort of home. It was only the distribution copy that was ugly.
***** if film was so high res, for its time, why wasnt it released in HD in the first place?
+Emil Bozhilov Back then there were no high res TVs. All TVs had a "resolution" around 800x600. Higher resolution TVs have been affordable for the most buyers maybe from the start of 2000s if even then.
Also there were no high capacity mediums. Video tapes would have had to be much larger to record high res footage, for which there really was no need, as no one had the equipment to utilize any higher resolutions. Blu-rays and HD-DVDs were the first to have the required capacity for high res.
+JayByte Actually it was 720 by 480.
Emil Bozhilov because DVD can't store HD. BLU RAY IS a *new technology* ... AND HI RES SCREENS, DISPLAY ETC DIDNT EXIST FOR THE COMPUTER. WITHOUT STEVE JOBS NONE OF THIS FANCY SHIT WOULD EVEN EXIST FOR THE AVERAGE JOE TO EVEN KNOW ABOUT UNLESS THEY WENT TO UNIVERSITY. I accidentally wrote this in caps because after steve jobs died apple updated their keyboard firmware and you have to press the caps lock key for over 10milliseconds for it to register as a keypress, otherwise the press doesn't register. sorry for the caps lock but we need steve jobs back.
Hold down 0, he looks like a hamster eating and making a funny noise.
Hold down 1, he's grabbing invisible boobs.
Hold down 2, he's dancing!
Hold down 3, he's grabbing an invisible butt and repeatedly saying "ass".
Hold down 7, Linus is disappointed in you.
Holy shit that was a good segway
2:11 LinusColorChangingTips
Great video, now tell us why the voices and background sounds are never the same volume level with surround sound. aka can't hear the voices but the explosions will launch you from your seat. ;-)
2:53 Heh! Jazz! Giggity!
was dat Denis as a master in the start
Adding the yell at the end of episode 6...
"I can't count very high." -Linus 2016
+ma33r But it was uploaded in 2015
+DJS oops
Good one. You really got yourself there.
before i watch it im going to guess crisp picture and much better sound. for me sound is all i need i love hearing explosions on my onkyo :)
ayy lmao linus said "SIXTEE...NINE..."
or nah
Imagine if Disney put Star Wars in the vault???!!!
"As high as 8k and more" Damn it you working for fuckin Trivago now?!
Linus, are any of your four grandparents still with us?
Who shot first ?
21:9 FTW ! ! !
I have no problem with digitized movies shot on film, as long it's not scanned in god damn 480p. It's 2016 fukn stahp
Never been this early before. Nice vid!
Well the first 20 seconds so far are
I am really sad when remastering of old black and white movie removes those right corner flashing white dots, which indicated to projectionist that movie reel is on it's end and he must swap next one. It is part of movie history and part of charm of these movies, people who are still watching them don't care or are upset when you do something like that, so don't waste your money and stop doing that, please.
GLORIUS 4:3!!!
+Azivegu I'm running a monitor that I've had since Win '98. 4:3 1280x1024@60fps. Gateway FPD1810
Lazuardi Mahardika / Alpha X Well, my monitor calls itself 4:3.. so idk
+Andloo Yunty it's 5:4 not 4:3.. the movie resolution back then was 4:3 but 1280x1024 is a 5:4 screen..
i also have still two of those benq 19'' 1280x1024 left and right of my 1920x1080 24'' mainscreen.. still do the job ^^
+Lazuardi Mahardika / Alpha X ew
Lazuardi Mahardika / Alpha X funny thing is that my 19'' 1280x1024 displays have almost the same quality like my 1080p 24'' screen has.. just a little lower in ppi.. but noone was talking about "hd" back in those days as far as i remember..
No more unibrow! Congratz Linus
(no sarcasm)
cool
Linus is still green.. Does the LMG team not have color accurate monitors? ):
Nope, it's just you. I don't see any green. I really can't tell if you're being sarcastic haha
+Tyler Watthanaphand Have you considered the possibility that YOUR monitor isn't color accurate?
+CocoaNutCakery I calibrated with a Spyder 4 a few weeks ago. I doubt it
+Tyler Watthanaphand Video and Audio mastering work exactly the same - you don't master/level to studio grade gear, you master so it looks decent on what 99% of the people own - and they own shittyass TFT panels and Beats by dre.
+Tyler Watthanaphand There is a slight green hue coming from the green screen, called color spill. Most people won't notice because it's ever so slightly green around the edges.
Hey Linus, do you know what air quotes mean? They involve irony and saying words in a sarcastic way. #justsaying
Linus
Speaking of counting, Valve!! they can't count to 3!!
Laserdisc is an analogue format
Ayy lmao
+Cameron AYY LMAO
+Mew [Jacob/PwnAzn] memes
+XXXYOLOSWAGMLG-X-XXBUTTONWALLSXX-XXX( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)420YOLO69OPTICXXX4CHANXXXpRAISEN13GHT34GL3 a sin
Nice meme
LinusMLGTips meme nice
Yah!!!!
What about video games?
And what about video games !? btw : U're an expert at Ads
Red Dwarf. Originally, the show was released on VHS. People threw a fit when the show was re-released onto DVDs as "remastered" with no option for it not to be. This in itself would have been fine if they hadn't gone crazy with the cheapass CGI effects overlaying old models. It looked horrible and people complained, so they re-re-released the DVDs on their original forms. Don't mess with Red Dwarf fans. Lol
my schools Internet can't even handle 480p at 30 fps
that's pretty good compared to my home internet
But why did lucas add hayden christians to return of the jedi
linus can't count very high? Linus is Gabe Newell in disguise confirmed
This generation has been disappointing due to the shear number of remasters there have been. While I like some of these, it stunts the growth of new games and they just seem like a cash grab. Or, you know, you could just play the PC version and get high resolutions and frame rates the first time.
+James Brown Homeworld Remastered bucks this trend. It's worth every penny to get that masterpiece running on modern OS's and looking and sounding as nice as it does. They improved things too like the UI's and used the same ones in both for some level of consistency. It includes the original versions too.
they claim 8k is the maximum the brain,eyes or wtv can comprehend .
I like the Special Edition Star Wars
come at me
I honestly thought John Cena was in the thumbnail...
Linus...... please please PLSEEAAASEE review the star wars edition hp laptop pleasee.. it would be amazing to get a your pov on it as im a huge fanboy of star wars and im looking to buy one :) guys please make him notice this plsplspls
I don't think they'd review a HP rebrand.
What about remastered Console games!