Every time I see an old camera like this featured in a video, I find the price is at least twice of what is said in the video. Looking today at eBay prices, while I do find early bidding below $100 USD on a few, most are priced $160-$250 for this camera.
On Amazon they're like 300 bucks plus. I was lucky to get mine from Amazon when it was priced at 150 something. I'll have to accessories to bump up the value of my g10 if I decide to sell it one day, but I love it too much to do that any time soon.
Well this video was made a year ago and has 650k views, that a lot of people that might now want one of these. I usually set up a saved search on ebay and wait for a good price one to pop up with things like this.
I have the Canon Powershot G9. My dad bought it brand new back in 2007 when it was first released. This camera has been on many family vacations and events. My dad recorded precious memories with it. He gave the camera to me in 2017 and I have been using it ever since. It is still working and functioning as it was in 2007. I absolutely love this camera.
Same with me but I still use an Olympus E3 and noise looks more like film grain than electronic noise. A lot of old digital cameras, the fist 10-12Mp use sensors with "large" pixels and their noise is more like 800-1200 ISO films than a today 20Mp noise.
Happened to skim across your content and wow! Looked up on my shelf and there was my nearly 1000-year-old G9! Bought it new back in the day when it first came out and sat in almost new condition! I found the battery charger and charged the two batteries. Still works just fine! Thank you for reminding me about it!!!!!!
Hey George. I saw this video a few months ago and decided to buy it. I am colorblind so I chose to use as a way to store 'color' in a way. Needless to say I am in love with this camera because of how good it is. I absolutely love it and it's versatility. I could have used my phone camera but the real thing has it's own fun. I absolutely love how good this camera is. Thank you.
I have always been a fan of the Canon G series cameras. Glad that you have had the opportunity to try out the G9. I am currently using the G5X II as my compact camera, but I've had the G3, G6, G11, and G1X. They are great to use when you want quality results without having to carry around larger gear.
When I come across a piece of underpowered technology made from plastic, I'll take my label maker and put the words "Teenage Engineering" on it and then feel better about myself.
Seeing this reminded me I have a G10 hidden in a drawer that I haven't used in a decade. It's an upgrade to the G9 with 14.7 mega pixels, bigger grip, exposure comp. dial and different lens (6.1-30.5mm). Time to charge it up and see what I've been missing!
My first digital camera was a 3.2 megapixel Olympus point and shoot and for years I couldn't work out why the pictures from that camera made me happier than from my 24 megapixel advanced (for the time) DSLR. But then I learnt about CCD sensors and how richly they rendered colours and contrast. Yes older CCDs had a few flaws but my goodness they made colours sing!
Quality of color depends on the size of pixels. Too many pixels crammed into sensor and quality goes down. But it sells better. If you want better images from todays cameras pick those with at least so called 1 inch sensors or fewer pixels.
@@stuartcarden1371 I recommend Panasonic Lumix TZ100 (ZS100), used one can be cheap. Has 1 inch sensor large pixels and deep colors. Otherwise you can use HDR (exposure bracketing) and stack it (I use easyHDR).
@@stuartcarden1371 The 5D is legendary in many ways, it can be used with very good results as a video camera too, there is a homebrew firmware scene for that. One thing that the 5D has going for it is large photosites, ie sensor pixels, which has numerous advantages.
I’m amazed that the G9 was the subject of the video. Mine was bought new, along with a G7, the both still work and make great pictures. Canon’s color science produces some nicely saturated, paint-like reds and greens. It’s still an enjoyable street photography experience.
I love my G15. The macro capabilities on it are mind blowing and I've been able to make the most of it with my custom color profile and aperture priority mode.
I actually carry my g9 everywhere with me. I have full frame cameras, micro 4/3 and crop sensors but there is something about this lil guy that just gets the moment right. Great video.
I have the Canon G9 for nearly a year now. And for street photography it is quite challenging but with the zoom you can make amazing picture in town and people are more comfortable. And for web publishing it is more than enough. I just put it in B&W or my personal profile images. I love the camera. And battery life is so good. I have the Gr iii, the XF10 and the X100F also but I sometimes find myself taking this camera. And for family moment it is always with me. You can easily print A3 with it. Nice camera Nice video.
@@GeorgeHolden this one is always with me and my main camera is a Nikon d5100. I understand the want for cool new things but I find it much more enjoyable to use older tech that requires you to think about what you are doing. I've also discovered shooting jpeg and raw together. I shoot everything In black and white and when I get home and look at the raw files I'm blown away.
I got one of these back in 2008 when I got back into photography. The image quality is amazing but the shutter lag was just terrible and ended up missing many shots.
I had a G12 and I loved it. Took great photos with it in NYC back in 2011. Great for street photography. Small unassuming camera, but plenty of manual controls.
Thanks for the video. In my film only days, the Canon QL-17 with 40mm f/1.7 lens was my favorite fixed-lens camera. In the digital era, the Canon G series is what I use when I need a fixed-lens camera. I have never owned or used the Canon G9, but I have owned and used the G5, G11, and G15. Loved the articulated screen on the G5 and G11. Love the lens (28-140mm f/1.8 to f/2.8 equivalent) on the G15. All three made great travel/vacation cameras.
I used to own a G9 back in the day. I totally forgot about it till i saw this video. I wonder where it is now. Probably in a box someplace. I should try and find it. Looks like it would be fun to use.
This camera is around $200 US, still a great camera , my sis has one. All of the Powershots I've used over the years have been pretty solid. One of my current P&S cams is a Powershot G5 with a whopping 5 MP, camera is still good for its age, and getting a really good photo with it is indeed exciting.
Wow, blast from the past. I couldn't afford the Powershots back when they were released. I had the Canon Ixus 60 and the Ixus 900ti (sold them off) and always looked up to the Powershot series. Seeing videos on using the CCD sensors are so cool. Cameras like the Nikon D200 or the Olympus E300/E500. Today I can't bring myself to buy more cameras, lol. I need to resist the Gear Acquisition Syndrome. I kept my Fuji F70EXR compact camera which has a Fuji CCD. Great find on the G9 though and I am glad you decided to take it home for "testing".
Hahahaha "testing" yeah I had an Ixus 70 and 90 when I was very young, the family camera. And yes the Nikom D200 has been on my radar for a bit of fun, maybe next year who knows
I bought this camera way back in 2017 on eBay in perfect condition for $50 when I was 14 because I wanted to start RUclips, I recently became interested in photography and suddenly remembered I had this thing just collecting dust. Currently thanking my younger self rn because people are selling it for like $200 minimum now 😭
Wow! I didn’t know that stuff about CCD vs. CMOS sensors! No wonder my photos from my semi-broken Olympus E-1 were so much more pleasing and film-like than my later DSLRs haha. Thank you for sharing! ❤❤❤
I have the cyber shot W30 and W35 (2006 and 2007) and I love them so much, we have +20 full size family photo albums that were taken with them. We moved on to a nicer canon later on but the cyber shot will always be my favorite.
When I bought my camera some years ago it was a choice between the Canon and a Nikon P7000... I chose the Nikon as the microphones seemed better... they are... but both are excellent for two reasons.. 1) they both had an optical viewfinder so you can brace the camera in close to your body to steady it. The second is it is pocket sized... you can whip it out and take a photograph without being obtrusive.
Back when I was learning to shoot with this camera many years ago, I tended to use the screen for shots due to the viewfinder not being as accurate as the screen for framing, but I never considered using the viewfinder to brace the camera against your face
I started watching this as I have a G15, but was great to see an X700 still in use. I got mine as a teenager when they were new and still have it with a Canon 50mm, a Sigma wide and a Tokina long zoom.
Great video man! This reminded of my Lumix FS3, such a nice little camera that (with all its limitations) is super fun to carry around. I totally agree with the “lack of risk = no fun” part, with modern gear is super easy to experience situations like these, that’s why we always have to find new ways to put us in discomfort while shooting 😂
I don't really know how to explain it, but the picture quality feels so nostalgic. Pretty much anything becomes beautiful after taking a photo with a camera like this
Ever since i got my SX210 IS a month or so ago: i've just been loving it; great to use, 14MP sensor, amazing photos, great contrast and depth of field, an incredibly good battery life, and overall a great time!
Yes! Fujifilm, Olympus, Panasonic, Pentax, Ricoh all made very desirable advanced compact cameras that make fantastic film-images. With a CCD camera, I can shoot from a moving train and get shots of passengers inside a train passing in the opposite direction only a few meters away. Isn't that what a camera is supposed to be able to do?
A fantastic little camera. I bought one and used it for ages until I sadly lost it on a hike. I bought another immediately to replace it. Still have it but something started to go wrong with the zoom focusing exactly the same as my G3. I currently use a G16 but can honestly 100% say that I preferred the G9 in virtually every aspect. Faster focusing, better close up photos and sharper images. I have photos taken with the G9 of a dragonfly where I was inches away, with the G16 they fly away before it can focus.
Should i get a g3, g5 or 6, or g9? I want it for street photography, landscapes, low light like approaching night, maybe automotive. I want the idea of getting a filmic like look and the nd built in filter.
Great review of a great little camera. I have traveled the world with my day job over the past 25 years or so and love doing photography along the way. I had already jumped from my trusty Nikon F to the Nikon D70 when the D70 was introduced. A problem developed over time as I carried way too much gear on business trips to remote locations overseas. I began trying various options and settled on the G9 about 15 years ago. Small, simple, and great photos of the type I wanted. Soon I moved to Micro4/3 but kept the Canon G9 in my kit. I also began obtaining more Cannon D9 as well as various accessories. I love this little gem which is easily pocketed and takes excellent photos. I even had one G9 retrofitted for infrared and have enjoyed learning something new in photography using it.
after some 30yrs of shooting analogue (mostly with both Canon F1 & A1 and FD 28mm f/2,8), I bough a Canon G10 in 2008. Have never needed or wanted to replace it with anything newer or more advanced. For me it has been, and still is, the best
ive been using a pretty similar pw sx 160 and i got to say it has been one of my best purcharses ever. These pw cameras are so fun and easy to use, yet you can mess with the config and get some awesome shots
I had the G9 when it first come out and it is a fun camera to use. I don't really see it producing film like images personally having shot film since the 70's but it does give a different old school vibe to photos. That's just my opinion. I stopped shooting film 2 years ago due to spiraling costs although I still have my Minolta x700, Mamiya C330s and Canon eos 50e plus several old 35mm film camera which no longer work, sitting on my collection shelf. Have fun with the camera :)
Thanks! That's fair, it's not a carbon copy for a specific film stock for sure, but compared with modern digital sensors the colour and softness is a lot nicer in my opinion
@@GeorgeHolden well I’m looking for a cheap enough camera for travel and also a professional camera for paid work. At the minute I do aerial photography with a drone but want to get a camera for stills and video I suppose too. Was recommended a canon 5d mark iii. I don’t know if I should spend that much (would a cheaper camera like the t6 or something do the job just as well?) I’m a camera noob (budget of like $1.5k to 2k)
@@barrylyons8102 $1.5k I would go used and get something like the Canon RP or Canon 6Dmkii with a couple of lenses - both great for photography with some video in there too. I started this channel and my business with the 6Dmkii, it's also small enough to be good for travel 👍
Good point about the gear paradox. Its like music or painting or any creative endeavor. We need the equipment to do the craft, its fun, but so easy to get wrapped up in it. To think the equipment makes the artist, but its not the case. Cameras like this are so great because its distinct and sets some limits, which seem to spur creativity. Having all options available like a modern digital camera is almost too much, where do you anchor? When you're a little limited you now have a framework to think and strategize
You want snappy DigiCam for low price. Get a canon S90 s95. Set it dial to TaV (speed shutter priority), set speed 1/500s (or 1/320s if darker scene), exposure -2/3, ISO Auto (and max iso 400 or 800 if darker like end of afternoon), set focus to manual and very important set it to Infinity.. even camera choosen f2 aperture, everything is focus. Set positive colors look like more filmish. And jpg only !! And get your lovely s95 in you hand palm and shot what you want, you ready for street photos.
Almost got a G7 back when it was released but ended up buying the wrong model, and left that in its bag, on a tree branch up in the mountains, drooled over the G9 and G10, didnt like the G11 so bought a Pentax K-7 instead and finally after 17 years got into the G series with a second hand G15 in January. It is a solid little beast. I may very well hook a G9 if I stumble over one for the right price, there is a certain something with the CCDs.
Very interesting take on the G9. I might have to seek one out but also really wanting to get my hands back on a m43. I sold my Olympus and the 17mm panny along with it and really regret it! By the way, I am really liking your channel. You do a great job of commingling gear with the art of street and I really appreciate that! I also like that you shoot film as well. Where's your evil twin though? I enjoy your humor! Thank you!
Thanks! That's interesting, I'm still enjoying my Olympus plus a 17mm at the moment. Deffo get back on the MFT train! And thank you, sadly the twin is purely for the MFT topic 😅 this one I did have more "dad-cam" sections but they kinda missed the point this time round!
Love my G9 as a casual no drama point and shoot to bring along on a walk…my other fave from this error is the Nikon P7000…. Both produce pleasing retro images. Oddly, I recon your closer to how Daido Moriyama makes images with such a camera than you are with a modern mirror less camera… even more reason to use them
Maybe I'm missing something, but if you want grain, you can take pretty much any digital camera, set the ISO to something ridiculously high, keep the shutter speed reasonable so you don't get motion blur (you may need a camera with shutter priority), and stop the lens down accordingly (shutter priority should do this for you automatically). But the key is that high ISO. If you can't stop the lens down far enough, then shoot in dimmer light, or, if it's an option, use a lens filter.
WAIT A MINUTE! I have been watching your channel for a hot minute and just put the pieces together that you're the George I have chatted with!! :P Love this. Was so excited back when you posted your LX100 review and here we are!! 👋
Finding this tickles me. I got this camera long ago when it released, it was my first expensive camera. While I barely remember the photos because I was so naïve back then, I found the video to be surprisingly good despite its limitations. It was grainy but sharp at night time. I captured several silly moments in life that wouldnt exist without it.
I have one of these and it’s great. Mine’s pre-owned with some battle damage and the focus box in the VF doesn’t match the one on the screen, but it’s small (if heavy), built like a tank and does produce lovely retro-style images. :)
I bought this new in 2008(?) and I still have it. I only recently dusted it off. I'm surprised the quality of the pictures have held up. Most surprisingly, the batteries are holding a pretty good charge so I haven't had to replace them. Thanks for the vid.
Great video mate. Had a Powershot, the G12 I think. Lovely little thing. CCD sensors are just great. They’re more flexible than I think people give them credit for. Best decision I made was getting the Leica M9, I’m getting images I’m more than happy with. How CCD renders is just fantastic. Like yourself, I’ve been on a pocket rocket CCD sensor charity shop bargain hunt. It gets addictive.
I have a Canon G12 that I keep around because it's been a solid performer every time I have used it, and it makes a good road trip, shoot from the window sort of camera. The only thing that has ever been disappointing about it has been the optical viewfinder.
Coming from the film SLR age I was used to instant shutter response. My first digital, the Powershot G2 missed many shots due to the slow startup time and shutter action. So I went for Nikon's D70 which had zero lag, and never looked at a compact digital again. Later i realised that these had improved. (Liked & subbed) Cheers!
I still use the Powershot G2, and it's a great camera. However, the startup time is unbearable. Though, with replacement batteries, the battery life is good enough to comfortably last a few hours without needing to turn the camera off in between pictures.
Should i go for a nikon d50 or canon PowerShot g3, g5, g6 or g9 (want to get as close to filmic look as possible) and not miss scenes when i need great focus
@@tylerfields2368 For great film-look images, I'm thinking of the Fujifilm X-Pro or XT series cameras, with built-in film emulation, like Velvia etc. Nikon's D50 has limited lens choices, I believe. You're better served with a D70s(bigger screen)/D70 or D80 if you want to use those older screw drive AF lenses. I also have a couple of Nikon D200. With that model you have to shop for a later serial no. to avoid the ones that were affected by low light sensor striping. With the D90, Nikon switched to CMOS sensors. But with software you can pretty much get film-like images from any digital camera.
I own a G10 and still use it today when I want something portable that still gives me full control of aperture, shutter speed, ISO and has a hot shoe for a full flash unit. What sold me on the G series at the time I bought it new was an article on a war correspondant that was using the G9. He said he could get stories he could not get when he had his "professional camera" gear with him. People were more relaxed with his small camera. If it was good enough to function in tough field conditions it was good enough for my shooting style. I also like the long battery life of the G10. I totally agree the the noise above 200 ISO can be a concern. Like all cameras it is important to know what it can do and work within those parameters.
I bought the G10 as a gift for someone and Oh I want to keep it. This camera is brilliant. Solid, solid construction, beautiful sensor, built in ND, solid Canon lens with semi fast (2.8) zoom, semi accessible manual controls, optical viewfinder... If this were a film camera that said "Contax" on it, it would go for big money, and then break :)
One of my fave cameras is an Optio W10. It's an underwater CCD camera with a sharp 3X zoom periscope lens. It's quite flat and fits onto the belt or in the pocket and hides there. The screen is transflective and sunlight legible, and shows histogram and focus peaking so you can be quite certain that your focus and exposure are suitable. It won't shoot usable video but it's pretty quick for photo. The W20 and W30 are similar enough, with sensor and other minor updates. The last CCD one might be WG-1 from 2011 i think, with WG-2 changing to CMOS. I actually love periscope lenses btw. They are criminally underrated. Unfortunately the W10 can't do RAW but i went to a vacation with friends just a couple years ago and did some amazing photos with this 15 year old camera. I have also been on and off using Powershot G2 that you showcased in another video. This one does RAW and exposure bracketing, you can get up to some advanced trickery with this old one.
G9 is a good camera, but do not be deceived. The camera of today's mid-tier smartphone camera will outperform it in every measure. I've seen results from a Galaxy S21 camera that are amazing. The older prosumer cameras have their charm, but they are now technological dinosaurs compared to the modern smartphone.
Very different use cases in my opinion, phone cameras today are great but still so limited in terms of creative manual control even with raw formats and third party camera apps. The closest are Sony's smartphones
I had a G2 for a while back in the mid-aughts, and back then I was actually shooting paying jobs with it, and had happy clients. They were surprisingly capable little cameras.
For anyone thinking this is a copy - here's my first video from May 2022 that started my series on budget cameras with titles just like this: ruclips.net/video/kWSwZOnCV9w/видео.html
Just found this and followed you and you’ve inspired me to dig out my canon G1X which has laid unused in a drawer for about four years and I will go out and give it a go 😮
So enjoyed your video. Did a lot of traveling over the years and around 2010 or so I decided that dragging a canon 20d plus lenses was getting out of hand. I didn’t get the G9 but the G10. I used that on cruises etc and loved it . Then I upgraded to the G12 with articulating screen until it failed after a few years and went for the last in the line…G16. I still have it and use it for family gatherings since travel has been curtailed due to wife’s health. The G16 feels so familiar in hand and produces lovely images. And by the way I have only just discovered MFT and I invested in a PEN -F silver beauty. It feels like I have an old film camera look with all the latest mirrorless features. Keep up the good work. Thanks again…Joe McGrath
My first digital camera was a Canon G2. I'm still pleased with the quality of those shots I took all those years ago. It had a great lens and if you could keep the ISO low or moderate and avoid blowing highlights it was at least as good as using medium or high speed 35mm film. Film and digital were still competing at the time!
Thanks for this video. I just bought one for double the price you mentioned but I wanted something for my upcoming trip to Italy that was more compact than my Sony A7r3 and less cumbersome than my film camera. Among the current point and shoot digicams everyone is pushing, this seemed like great quality at a decent price point. I'm really excited.
I still own a Nikon Coolpix 995 from 2001, which produces images somewhat akin to yours, though with a more modest 3MP resolution. However, I must acknowledge the distinct difference in the quality of noise between retro analog film cameras and their early digital counterparts, not just technically but also aesthetically. Film grain has a certain charm-consistent and visually pleasing-while the noise from old digital cameras tends to be harsher, less appealing, and often riddled with chromatic fringing.
I own several Fujifilm mirrorless cameras (X-T20, X0T2 & X-Pro1) plus lenses. I recently purchased an older small Fuji. A less know X-M1. It's a cool little camera and well suited for street photography. The only drawback is the lack of a view finder, although it has a tilt screen. I also own a Canon S90 point and shoot. It's cool and can be shot in completely manual mode. It's big drawback is it is so small and hard to hold.
This camera Is so good! One year ago I started getting interested into photography, one day I went to eat to my aunt's and I asked her about what should I start with (she's been a professional wedding photographer for the past 30 years), she stood up went to her room and brought a box with a powershot G7 in it (same year as this one, but 10mp) she told me she was getting rid of it, but I could give it a second life. Man! I've been so happy with this camera. For the past year I've shoot thousands and thousands of photos. In all conditions and in all kind of places. I know it's very rudimentary haha but I know every little trick it can give you and this camera will not lett you down. Now I am looking to upgrade to a mirrorless, but this camera will always have a special place in my heart.
Thanks so much for sharing, I love these cameras getting a second lease of life with enthusiastic owners! They don't deserve to simply collect dust on a shelf
You made me pick one up! Just got one in mint condition, will all the accessories & spare batteries for £65.. bargain! Super excited to test out this little beast!
The G9 was my camera for a few years when it came out. Took a lot of nice photos with it and got a kick out of the time lapse feature on it which I'd use quite often. Really bad with indoor low light but what camera of that type wasn't. This video reminded me that I had a lot of photos from that time that I just shot in or converted to B&W because of that bad grain to just make it look like film.
Thanks for this George 👍 I bought one new in 2007 and still use it regularly. Love the size, weight and the pictures coming out of it. I’ll prefer it often to my 35mm, M43 and full frame cameras when travelling or doing street photography. Wonderful camera! Thanks for the CCD info. I didn’t know that.
I'm about to buy this G9 this week, I will leave my personal feedback here soon after the weekends that might be useful for those to plan to have this tiny chunk.
CMOS was chosen over CCD because of bandwidth struggles of CCD. you couldn't effectively go over 10 megapixel on CCD on sensor size, bandwidth would choke up, so they went with CMOS. Backside illuminated CMOS minimizes rolling shutter and stacked as well but the price for them are significantly higher than normal cmos.
I bought one of these new in 2007. I still use it now, and have taken more photos with this than my DSLR. It takes up less space so more likely to carry when not going out specifically to photograph stuff. I also have the filter attachment/ telephoto lens. That rarely got used.
One camera that I'd also recommend is the Sony Cybershot dsc-w290 due to the similar features with a 12.1 megapixel sensor. The one I own has most of the same picture setting but it's all made into a digital interface instead of tactile scrolls. Also pertaining to comments about prices being more than said in the video, other places will have different demand and supply of products. you May be able to find them really cheap somewhere those cameras are tossed around like e-waste. In most of America, these older cameras are sought after for an authentic old digicam quality of photos.
Your reason is same as mine why I shifted from DSLR to mirrorless is that I can use mirrorless camera much like shooting with my smart phone without thinking much about the settings and just enjoy photography. Shooting in live view is mirrorless (along with small digicams and smart phones) major advantage over DSLR where autofocus speed and focus hunting is a real pain in most DSLR when shooting in live view! Nowadays I use shutter priority mode mainly for sports and fast action events like fashion shows, and "P" (Programmed Automatic) mode adjusting just the + and - exposure compensation when shooting easy subjects like daylight street candid activities and nature landscapes. Digital camera nowadays can be very smart that makes you a lazy from traditional film photographers' point of view, but that's not the point really! You shoot photos because you enjoy doing it and that should be your main reason why you're into photography. Image quality should come naturally as long as you know how to use your camera, that is you decide what to shoot based on your keen eye then let the camera do the processing. This should be the basis of photographer - camera relationship in my point of view. This is why most people use smart phones nowadays as point-and-shoot camera thingy for convenience and portability. BTW: I still bring with me my 12 year old Nikon P300 wherever I go when I need a good camera I can fish out of my pocket because it can zoom in optically up to 100 mm in full resolution that my smart phone usually crops in digital zoom.
@@aaronmoore3050 zooming in and out is all about composing your shots. It is the most important thing for me because I shoot fashion shows and modeling where shooting close-up headshot to wide angle full body is very tiring when I have to move closer and farther just to get the shot that I need. Plus the fact that models faraway from the stage/ catwalk cannot be shot with just a single focal length if you're shooting wide group shots then instantly switch to close-up shot of just a single model's face. No single focal length prime lens can do that. So instead of cropping it out and recomposing with Photoshop, I prefer to do it in-camera zooming in with my lens. Image quality just comes in second, that's why I bring my Yongnuo LED lights and PAR lights with me to illuminate the scene.when needed in low light conditions. But still, composition comes first whenever practical and comfortable as possible where zooming in and out is just one of the process. Then you'll be a winner when you slay the shots!
@@aaronmoore3050 the point in all this photographing thing is that you enjoy what you do. This is what I call a leisure job where work and play go hand-in-hand. I shoot anything from animals and wildlife, travel and nature, architectural, experimental, food, products, sports... and the list would go on and on as I do all types of photography although fashion and showbiz photography is my bread and butter at the moment. I started as a photojournalist and a feature correspondent in a newspaper during the final decade of film photography in 1998 (I have a bachelor's degree in Broadcast Communications so landing a job in a newspaper isn't that hard). But I ended up shooting fashion shows when I started shooting models for my portrait paintings and visual art work, and eventually managing and handling talents since 2003. In fact, my purpose in creating my RUclips channel in 2008 was primarily for talents promotion. Yes, like you I don't really like heavy make-up which makes preteens looked like an adult. But there's nothing we could do if styling and make-over are needed in cosplay and glamour themes. But in my observation there are great stylists and make-up artists out there who could really bring out the character and personality of the models so I just let them be. After all a model's job is to portray the character she was asked to do and carry the dresses and costumes well so people would buy the product she endorses.... But if really be given the chance, I would love to land a job at National Geographic magazine because nature and wildlife photography really is my first love, along with travel photography which I enjoyed the most.
@@aaronmoore3050 also it is said that camera is just a tool and it is the photographer who creates the photograph with his keen senses. I confer with that. So I don't fiddle much with the settings but rather just look at the LCD live view of my mirrorless, dial the correct exposure and compose the shot. When I like what I see on the LCD monitor then I click on the shutter button, as simple as that. If some shots failed for whatever reason there's always Photoshop to correct them anyway. As long as I get the proper exposure with good details and sharpness then clients will be happy. Most clients wouldn't mind a little bit of grain noise anyway, but they surely will get mad if you give them blurry shots because you choose a slow shutter speed to prioritize a low ISO, or failed to use the proper autofocus points that the lens back focuses on the subject. In the end, you cannot fault the camera by itself but your shooting workflow. You must come up with your own shooting techniques because no single camera setting can be used for all kinds of subjects and scenes with varying lighting conditions. But you will not go wrong with Program Auto, Shutter Priority, and Aperture Priority with Auto ISO modes. These functionality are there to make the job easier so you'll just think of composing the shots than fiddle with manual settings not very useful or applicable in sports and wildlife (birds in-flight for example where busy background and lighting condition always vary that you don't have the time to dial manual settings while maintaining your fast moving subject inside the frame).
@@aaronmoore3050 All those PASM settings have their own uses depending on the level of your expertise. What worked for me might not work for you and vice versa so there's no right or wrong in this discussion. But I only mentioned the most convenient shooting modes that I am comfortable with based on my preference, and these preferences vary per photographer. Also, I know my personal settings and I don't usually lend my main camera to others. And even if someone did change the settings on my camera in an event I know how to change it back and return to my personal camera settings because mastery of my own camera is a prerogative for me before I use it for professional use ( I do a lot of gadget testing and dry run before using it in paid jobs. I practice shooting at home and in my backyard). So camera settings is not an issue for me as long as I use the familiar settings that are most convenient for the types of subject that I shoot under a particular lighting condition. But shooting it right based on the output displayed in the LCD preview is very important for me that's why I do test shots and showing them to client before I proceed to the photoshoot session. If I failed a shot, then I recompose and re-shoot the scene immediately with a different setting. I never mentioned having fun, but I did mentioned "enjoying" what I do otherwise I wouldn't last two decades of doing my job if I get bored in the process. Yes I get stressed sometimes with work schedules, ever changing industry standards and the likes but it does not justify reasons to quit because I do love my job and photography really is my passion along with painting, portraiture and digital art. If people are happy with my shots then I get paid reasonably. If I get confronted with failed shots then I learn from my mistakes and either change my shooting techniques or upgrade to better gears. Watching RUclips tutorials are great references, but I develop my own shooting techniques as soon as I get the hang of it upgrading my skills and know-how in the process. That's all there is to "having fun" if you put it that way, but no need to buy an xbox as I'm not a gamer, LoL!
Check out MPB here and grab a used camera deal!
MPB UK: prf.hn/l/QLBLRLl
MPB US: prf.hn/l/y8b8X8w
MPB EU: prf.hn/l/BJ1JqJo
Every time I see an old camera like this featured in a video, I find the price is at least twice of what is said in the video. Looking today at eBay prices, while I do find early bidding below $100 USD on a few, most are priced $160-$250 for this camera.
On Amazon they're like 300 bucks plus. I was lucky to get mine from Amazon when it was priced at 150 something. I'll have to accessories to bump up the value of my g10 if I decide to sell it one day, but I love it too much to do that any time soon.
yea I could never find one thats going for 30 bucks like what ytube people say
Well this video was made a year ago and has 650k views, that a lot of people that might now want one of these. I usually set up a saved search on ebay and wait for a good price one to pop up with things like this.
Because when people make videos on an item that become viral people end up buying causing lower supply and higher demand causing increase in price.
the vid is a year old.
The fact that they're sold as "vintage" makes me feel a billion years old
Right? I shrivel and decompose
We went through a 90s revival without flannel shirts and grunge, instead we got buffalo shoes and neck-chokers. I'm disappointed.
same 😭
I have the Canon Powershot G9. My dad bought it brand new back in 2007 when it was first released. This camera has been on many family vacations and events. My dad recorded precious memories with it. He gave the camera to me in 2017 and I have been using it ever since. It is still working and functioning as it was in 2007. I absolutely love this camera.
Love that, think this one has been bought by my gf's dad since new! Such great cameras that perform so well even 16 years later
Your dad did an awesome decision, fully maximized the usage.
cute
Thanks now they’re double in price
@@mintsaucemilitia I got one for $200, had it for 5 months then sold it for $160
@@mintsaucemilitiawhich is more than double of some the prices he showed in the video
Triple, not less than 300€
And it’s no closer to any 100 USD film camera in terms of iq
Because you would've discovered this camera and gotten it at that price if he hadn't made this video?
I normally hate noise/grain in photos but it looks so good with street photography 📸 I'm genuinely surprised
Thanks for watching!
I'm the opposite I love grain in photos, but it has to be the right amount though, it can add a ton of character.
Same with me but I still use an Olympus E3 and noise looks more like film grain than electronic noise.
A lot of old digital cameras, the fist 10-12Mp use sensors with "large" pixels and their noise is more like 800-1200 ISO films than a today 20Mp noise.
@@mmadmic That's why I love my Canon 5D, it's unbeatable with vintage lenses in that area.
But might get this G9 next to it, for more portability.
Happened to skim across your content and wow!
Looked up on my shelf and there was my nearly 1000-year-old G9!
Bought it new back in the day when it first came out and sat in almost new condition!
I found the battery charger and charged the two batteries.
Still works just fine!
Thank you for reminding me about it!!!!!!
My daughter is a teacher in Manchester. Always good to see street photography from there. Good video George!
Hey George. I saw this video a few months ago and decided to buy it. I am colorblind so I chose to use as a way to store 'color' in a way. Needless to say I am in love with this camera because of how good it is. I absolutely love it and it's versatility. I could have used my phone camera but the real thing has it's own fun. I absolutely love how good this camera is. Thank you.
I have always been a fan of the Canon G series cameras. Glad that you have had the opportunity to try out the G9. I am currently using the G5X II as my compact camera, but I've had the G3, G6, G11, and G1X. They are great to use when you want quality results without having to carry around larger gear.
Great to hear and yes agreed great options for everyday carry!
You recommend the g3, g5, g9 or whicu one for best filmic like production? I do like the idea of a nd filter built in
When I come across a piece of underpowered technology made from plastic, I'll take my label maker and put the words "Teenage Engineering" on it and then feel better about myself.
I need a label maker in my life
Pull a James Popsys and label it “LEICA”
Except the Canon G9 series cameras are almost completely made from metal. They are tanks. Teenage Engineering does make awesome gear.
😂😂😂
Underrated comment 😂
Seeing this reminded me I have a G10 hidden in a drawer that I haven't used in a decade. It's an upgrade to the G9 with 14.7 mega pixels, bigger grip, exposure comp. dial and different lens (6.1-30.5mm). Time to charge it up and see what I've been missing!
Ah yes I've seen the G10! Think I could take the shorter focal length for better image quality
My first digital camera was a 3.2 megapixel Olympus point and shoot and for years I couldn't work out why the pictures from that camera made me happier than from my 24 megapixel advanced (for the time) DSLR. But then I learnt about CCD sensors and how richly they rendered colours and contrast. Yes older CCDs had a few flaws but my goodness they made colours sing!
Totally agree!
Quality of color depends on the size of pixels. Too many pixels crammed into sensor and quality goes down. But it sells better.
If you want better images from todays cameras pick those with at least so called 1 inch sensors or fewer pixels.
@@piotrczubryt1111 Thanks for the info! I've actually moved to shooting a Canon 5D from back in 2005 and it produces really wonderful pictures.
@@stuartcarden1371
I recommend Panasonic Lumix TZ100 (ZS100), used one can be cheap. Has 1 inch sensor large pixels and deep colors. Otherwise you can use HDR (exposure bracketing) and stack it (I use easyHDR).
@@stuartcarden1371 The 5D is legendary in many ways, it can be used with very good results as a video camera too, there is a homebrew firmware scene for that. One thing that the 5D has going for it is large photosites, ie sensor pixels, which has numerous advantages.
I’m amazed that the G9 was the subject of the video. Mine was bought new, along with a G7, the both still work and make great pictures. Canon’s color science produces some nicely saturated, paint-like reds and greens. It’s still an enjoyable street photography experience.
Thanks for sharing!
I love my G15. The macro capabilities on it are mind blowing and I've been able to make the most of it with my custom color profile and aperture priority mode.
This camera got me started in the photography business. I actually used it for wedding gigs and clients didn’t know the difference at that time.
That's awesome!
I actually carry my g9 everywhere with me. I have full frame cameras, micro 4/3 and crop sensors but there is something about this lil guy that just gets the moment right. Great video.
Thanks!
I have the Canon G9 for nearly a year now. And for street photography it is quite challenging but with the zoom you can make amazing picture in town and people are more comfortable.
And for web publishing it is more than enough. I just put it in B&W or my personal profile images. I love the camera. And battery life is so good.
I have the Gr iii, the XF10 and the X100F also but I sometimes find myself taking this camera. And for family moment it is always with me.
You can easily print A3 with it. Nice camera
Nice video.
That's great to hear, thanks for sharing!
I've been using one of these for about 6 months and I absolutely love it. It's my everyday carry.
Amazing! It's definitely the reliable daily
@@GeorgeHolden this one is always with me and my main camera is a Nikon d5100. I understand the want for cool new things but I find it much more enjoyable to use older tech that requires you to think about what you are doing. I've also discovered shooting jpeg and raw together. I shoot everything In black and white and when I get home and look at the raw files I'm blown away.
I got one of these back in 2008 when I got back into photography. The image quality is amazing but the shutter lag was just terrible and ended up missing many shots.
I agree the shutter lag is a let down
I have a G10 and I love it. I purchased it 3 or 4 years ago and I use it as an everyday walk about camera and the shots are great.
Great to hear!
I had a G12 and I loved it. Took great photos with it in NYC back in 2011. Great for street photography. Small unassuming camera, but plenty of manual controls.
Very cool!
mine had lens error issues back in 2015 and then i replaced the lens but its broken again this year 😂😂😂
g9 or g12 or g16 which one to choose?
G12 for me. It has the front dial and the ISO dial. And is less expensive than G16
@@leeshery1850
And articulating screen
Thanks for the video.
In my film only days, the Canon QL-17 with 40mm f/1.7 lens was my favorite fixed-lens camera. In the digital era, the Canon G series is what I use when I need a fixed-lens camera.
I have never owned or used the Canon G9, but I have owned and used the G5, G11, and G15.
Loved the articulated screen on the G5 and G11.
Love the lens (28-140mm f/1.8 to f/2.8 equivalent) on the G15.
All three made great travel/vacation cameras.
That's great to hear, I nearly picked up the QL-17 recently!
Everyone is going retro. Time to take out my old 17th century quill pen & my FinePix A205s. Thanks George.
Eyy retro time 📸
Because most things were better back then, and these pictures had a charm.
I used to own a G9 back in the day. I totally forgot about it till i saw this video. I wonder where it is now. Probably in a box someplace. I should try and find it. Looks like it would be fun to use.
I bought this a month ago and it's always in my camera bag no matter what main camera I've got with me! Such a great camera, great video!
No way! 😅 It's an easy no brainer to carry with you for sure
how much did you pay for one, i dint know if its this video but they are well over $100
@@konfusion17 I got mine for about £70 is pretty good condition!
So Canon pro 1 or this g9 ????? The g9 is not $100 more
Def over 150 and do it look like his
This camera is around $200 US, still a great camera , my sis has one. All of the Powershots I've used over the years have been pretty solid. One of my current P&S cams is a Powershot G5 with a whopping 5 MP, camera is still good for its age, and getting a really good photo with it is indeed exciting.
That's great to hear!
Wow, blast from the past.
I couldn't afford the Powershots back when they were released.
I had the Canon Ixus 60 and the Ixus 900ti (sold them off) and always looked up to the Powershot series.
Seeing videos on using the CCD sensors are so cool. Cameras like the Nikon D200 or the Olympus E300/E500.
Today I can't bring myself to buy more cameras, lol.
I need to resist the Gear Acquisition Syndrome.
I kept my Fuji F70EXR compact camera which has a Fuji CCD.
Great find on the G9 though and I am glad you decided to take it home for "testing".
Hahahaha "testing" yeah I had an Ixus 70 and 90 when I was very young, the family camera. And yes the Nikom D200 has been on my radar for a bit of fun, maybe next year who knows
I remember there was mad hype and lore around the fuji f31d back in the day
@@auberginesplash oh yeah, I remember the F31d! It had a great sensor for a compact camera.
I bought this camera way back in 2017 on eBay in perfect condition for $50 when I was 14 because I wanted to start RUclips, I recently became interested in photography and suddenly remembered I had this thing just collecting dust. Currently thanking my younger self rn because people are selling it for like $200 minimum now 😭
Wow! I didn’t know that stuff about CCD vs. CMOS sensors! No wonder my photos from my semi-broken Olympus E-1 were so much more pleasing and film-like than my later DSLRs haha. Thank you for sharing! ❤❤❤
Thanks for watching! Yeah there's definitely room for both CMOS and CCD in the cameras we use
I have the cyber shot W30 and W35 (2006 and 2007) and I love them so much, we have +20 full size family photo albums that were taken with them. We moved on to a nicer canon later on but the cyber shot will always be my favorite.
When I bought my camera some years ago it was a choice between the Canon and a Nikon P7000... I chose the Nikon as the microphones seemed better... they are... but both are excellent for two reasons.. 1) they both had an optical viewfinder so you can brace the camera in close to your body to steady it. The second is it is pocket sized... you can whip it out and take a photograph without being obtrusive.
Thanks for sharing!
Back when I was learning to shoot with this camera many years ago, I tended to use the screen for shots due to the viewfinder not being as accurate as the screen for framing, but I never considered using the viewfinder to brace the camera against your face
or body*
@@suspiciousstew1169 And tuck in your elbows which forms a firm triangular platform.
I started watching this as I have a G15, but was great to see an X700 still in use. I got mine as a teenager when they were new and still have it with a Canon 50mm, a Sigma wide and a Tokina long zoom.
Yes love my x-700
Great video man! This reminded of my Lumix FS3, such a nice little camera that (with all its limitations) is super fun to carry around. I totally agree with the “lack of risk = no fun” part, with modern gear is super easy to experience situations like these, that’s why we always have to find new ways to put us in discomfort while shooting 😂
Eyy exactly man! Yeah weirdly we say we want perfect cameras but actually it's the imperfections that make them fun to use 😅
My go too is a Fuji finepix S1000fd. It’s a really simple mix between a point and shoot and a dslr (mainly point and shoot) and it makes a great daily
I don't really know how to explain it, but the picture quality feels so nostalgic. Pretty much anything becomes beautiful after taking a photo with a camera like this
Thanks for sharing!
Ever since i got my SX210 IS a month or so ago: i've just been loving it; great to use, 14MP sensor, amazing photos, great contrast and depth of field, an incredibly good battery life, and overall a great time!
That's awesome to hear
This brings good memories. I bought mine during a trip to Japan in 2007.
I was amazed at being able to shoot raw with a point and shoot camera 😅
Taking this to Japan would be a dream! It's such a little pocket rocket for features 😄
Yes! Fujifilm, Olympus, Panasonic, Pentax, Ricoh all made very desirable advanced compact cameras that make fantastic film-images. With a CCD camera, I can shoot from a moving train and get shots of passengers inside a train passing in the opposite direction only a few meters away. Isn't that what a camera is supposed to be able to do?
Exactly!
A fantastic little camera. I bought one and used it for ages until I sadly lost it on a hike. I bought another immediately to replace it. Still have it but something started to go wrong with the zoom focusing exactly the same as my G3. I currently use a G16 but can honestly 100% say that I preferred the G9 in virtually every aspect. Faster focusing, better close up photos and sharper images. I have photos taken with the G9 of a dragonfly where I was inches away, with the G16 they fly away before it can focus.
That's great to hear thanks for sharing!
Would you recommend getting the g9 or the g16 ?
Should i get a g3, g5 or 6, or g9? I want it for street photography, landscapes, low light like approaching night, maybe automotive. I want the idea of getting a filmic like look and the nd built in filter.
I have a G9 in perfect conditions, since 2008 and it works like the first day i bought it......Great little camera!!
Great review of a great little camera. I have traveled the world with my day job over the past 25 years or so and love doing photography along the way. I had already jumped from my trusty Nikon F to the Nikon D70 when the D70 was introduced. A problem developed over time as I carried way too much gear on business trips to remote locations overseas. I began trying various options and settled on the G9 about 15 years ago. Small, simple, and great photos of the type I wanted. Soon I moved to Micro4/3 but kept the Canon G9 in my kit. I also began obtaining more Cannon D9 as well as various accessories. I love this little gem which is easily pocketed and takes excellent photos. I even had one G9 retrofitted for infrared and have enjoyed learning something new in photography using it.
Thanks for sharing!
after some 30yrs of shooting analogue (mostly with both Canon F1 & A1 and FD 28mm f/2,8), I bough a Canon G10 in 2008. Have never needed or wanted to replace it with anything newer or more advanced. For me it has been, and still is, the best
That's great to hear!
This camera looks so fun, I love "vintage" digital.
Is great!
ive been using a pretty similar pw sx 160 and i got to say it has been one of my best purcharses ever. These pw cameras are so fun and easy to use, yet you can mess with the config and get some awesome shots
I had the G9 when it first come out and it is a fun camera to use. I don't really see it producing film like images personally having shot film since the 70's but it does give a different old school vibe to photos. That's just my opinion. I stopped shooting film 2 years ago due to spiraling costs although I still have my Minolta x700, Mamiya C330s and Canon eos 50e plus several old 35mm film camera which no longer work, sitting on my collection shelf.
Have fun with the camera :)
Thanks! That's fair, it's not a carbon copy for a specific film stock for sure, but compared with modern digital sensors the colour and softness is a lot nicer in my opinion
What camera would you recommend
@@barrylyons8102 in general?
@@GeorgeHolden well I’m looking for a cheap enough camera for travel and also a professional camera for paid work. At the minute I do aerial photography with a drone but want to get a camera for stills and video I suppose too. Was recommended a canon 5d mark iii. I don’t know if I should spend that much (would a cheaper camera like the t6 or something do the job just as well?) I’m a camera noob (budget of like $1.5k to 2k)
@@barrylyons8102 $1.5k I would go used and get something like the Canon RP or Canon 6Dmkii with a couple of lenses - both great for photography with some video in there too. I started this channel and my business with the 6Dmkii, it's also small enough to be good for travel 👍
Good point about the gear paradox. Its like music or painting or any creative endeavor. We need the equipment to do the craft, its fun, but so easy to get wrapped up in it. To think the equipment makes the artist, but its not the case. Cameras like this are so great because its distinct and sets some limits, which seem to spur creativity. Having all options available like a modern digital camera is almost too much, where do you anchor? When you're a little limited you now have a framework to think and strategize
You want snappy DigiCam for low price. Get a canon S90 s95. Set it dial to TaV (speed shutter priority), set speed 1/500s (or 1/320s if darker scene), exposure -2/3, ISO Auto (and max iso 400 or 800 if darker like end of afternoon), set focus to manual and very important set it to Infinity.. even camera choosen f2 aperture, everything is focus. Set positive colors look like more filmish. And jpg only !! And get your lovely s95 in you hand palm and shot what you want, you ready for street photos.
Thanks for the tip!
Almost got a G7 back when it was released but ended up buying the wrong model, and left that in its bag, on a tree branch up in the mountains, drooled over the G9 and G10, didnt like the G11 so bought a Pentax K-7 instead and finally after 17 years got into the G series with a second hand G15 in January. It is a solid little beast. I may very well hook a G9 if I stumble over one for the right price, there is a certain something with the CCDs.
Thanks for sharing!
Very interesting take on the G9. I might have to seek one out but also really wanting to get my hands back on a m43. I sold my Olympus and the 17mm panny along with it and really regret it! By the way, I am really liking your channel. You do a great job of commingling gear with the art of street and I really appreciate that! I also like that you shoot film as well. Where's your evil twin though? I enjoy your humor! Thank you!
Thanks! That's interesting, I'm still enjoying my Olympus plus a 17mm at the moment. Deffo get back on the MFT train! And thank you, sadly the twin is purely for the MFT topic 😅 this one I did have more "dad-cam" sections but they kinda missed the point this time round!
G9,G12, both of them brilliant cameras, even today, I have both.😊 Perfect for many people !
Does the G12 have the same film-like quality for pictures?
Love my G9 as a casual no drama point and shoot to bring along on a walk…my other fave from this error is the Nikon P7000…. Both produce pleasing retro images. Oddly, I recon your closer to how Daido Moriyama makes images with such a camera than you are with a modern mirror less camera… even more reason to use them
That's interesting! I've heard good things about the P7000
I love my G12 for street photography and have been pleasantly surprised with the quality. It is wonderful "grab and go" camera.
Thanks for sharing!
Still use one today, built like a tank and never let me down
Ol'compact
Maybe I'm missing something, but if you want grain, you can take pretty much any digital camera, set the ISO to something ridiculously high, keep the shutter speed reasonable so you don't get motion blur (you may need a camera with shutter priority), and stop the lens down accordingly (shutter priority should do this for you automatically). But the key is that high ISO. If you can't stop the lens down far enough, then shoot in dimmer light, or, if it's an option, use a lens filter.
WAIT A MINUTE! I have been watching your channel for a hot minute and just put the pieces together that you're the George I have chatted with!! :P Love this. Was so excited back when you posted your LX100 review and here we are!! 👋
Eyy! Yes I have been on a craze with your videos recently too, love to try any and all cameras - especially from the 2000s! 😄
Finding this tickles me. I got this camera long ago when it released, it was my first expensive camera. While I barely remember the photos because I was so naïve back then, I found the video to be surprisingly good despite its limitations. It was grainy but sharp at night time. I captured several silly moments in life that wouldnt exist without it.
That's great to hear!
I have one of these and it’s great. Mine’s pre-owned with some battle damage and the focus box in the VF doesn’t match the one on the screen, but it’s small (if heavy), built like a tank and does produce lovely retro-style images. :)
Yeah I love the tank factor! Ours is in good shape, nothing faulty as far as I can tell yet
The Canon G9 is now £150-180 thanks to videos like these.
You know what also produces "lovely, soft, film-like images"? The tone curves on your RAW editor of choice!
This is true!
I bought this new in 2008(?) and I still have it. I only recently dusted it off. I'm surprised the quality of the pictures have held up. Most surprisingly, the batteries are holding a pretty good charge so I haven't had to replace them. Thanks for the vid.
Great video mate. Had a Powershot, the G12 I think. Lovely little thing. CCD sensors are just great. They’re more flexible than I think people give them credit for. Best decision I made was getting the Leica M9, I’m getting images I’m more than happy with. How CCD renders is just fantastic. Like yourself, I’ve been on a pocket rocket CCD sensor charity shop bargain hunt. It gets addictive.
Yeah it really is addictive, my favourite way to waste time is eBay auctions for very bad compact cameras 😅
@@GeorgeHolden my dad recently picked up a mint, fully boxed Canon ISUX 80 IS for ten quid! Well jealous :)
I have a Canon G12 that I keep around because it's been a solid performer every time I have used it, and it makes a good road trip, shoot from the window sort of camera. The only thing that has ever been disappointing about it has been the optical viewfinder.
Coming from the film SLR age I was used to instant shutter response.
My first digital, the Powershot G2 missed many shots due to the slow startup time and shutter action.
So I went for Nikon's D70 which had zero lag, and never looked at a compact digital again.
Later i realised that these had improved.
(Liked & subbed)
Cheers!
Thanks for watching!
I still use the Powershot G2, and it's a great camera. However, the startup time is unbearable. Though, with replacement batteries, the battery life is good enough to comfortably last a few hours without needing to turn the camera off in between pictures.
@@vivek_v good point.
Should i go for a nikon d50 or canon PowerShot g3, g5, g6 or g9 (want to get as close to filmic look as possible) and not miss scenes when i need great focus
@@tylerfields2368 For great film-look images, I'm thinking of the Fujifilm X-Pro or XT series cameras, with built-in film emulation, like Velvia etc. Nikon's D50 has limited lens choices, I believe. You're better served with a D70s(bigger screen)/D70 or D80 if you want to use those older screw drive AF lenses. I also have a couple of Nikon D200. With that model you have to shop for a later serial no. to avoid the ones that were affected by low light sensor striping. With the D90, Nikon switched to CMOS sensors. But with software you can pretty much get film-like images from any digital camera.
I’ve been shooting a G9 for the past couple of weeks and I agree it’s great fun!
That's fantastic to hear, thanks for watching!
4:04 those are some really nice photos but did you edit those or they are just like that?
ofc he edited it. if you want that look out of camera then you better get fujifilm
He edited them for hours
was wondering the same thing
Your reviews about the G9 made me decide to purchase this one among all other vintage CCD cameras. Got it for just $70 in mint condition. Subbed!
That's awesome, thanks!
For anyone wondering, this camera makes exactly zero film photos
But it is unlimited though!
I own a G10 and still use it today when I want something portable that still gives me full control of aperture, shutter speed, ISO and has a hot shoe for a full flash unit.
What sold me on the G series at the time I bought it new was an article on a war correspondant that was using the G9. He said he could get stories he could not get when he had his "professional camera" gear with him. People were more relaxed with his small camera. If it was good enough to function in tough field conditions it was good enough for my shooting style.
I also like the long battery life of the G10.
I totally agree the the noise above 200 ISO can be a concern. Like all cameras it is important to know what it can do and work within those parameters.
Agreed and thanks for sharing!
*checks eBay*
*seeing minimum price being $150*
*closes eBay *
🤦🏼♂️ checks eBay, sold yesterday and today for £36 and £57...
@@GeorgeHolden well now i cant find any under 250 :(
I owned this many moons ago. It was terrible in low light but in daylight it was wonderful
"Unlimited film photos." I don't get it. If you were trying to be clever, you failed.
Sorry Bill
I bought the G10 as a gift for someone and Oh I want to keep it. This camera is brilliant. Solid, solid construction, beautiful sensor, built in ND, solid Canon lens with semi fast (2.8) zoom, semi accessible manual controls, optical viewfinder... If this were a film camera that said "Contax" on it, it would go for big money, and then break :)
True!
ytber: they are sellig about 30 dollars on ebay
me looking on ebay: 200 bucks and up
mfw
One of my fave cameras is an Optio W10. It's an underwater CCD camera with a sharp 3X zoom periscope lens. It's quite flat and fits onto the belt or in the pocket and hides there. The screen is transflective and sunlight legible, and shows histogram and focus peaking so you can be quite certain that your focus and exposure are suitable. It won't shoot usable video but it's pretty quick for photo. The W20 and W30 are similar enough, with sensor and other minor updates. The last CCD one might be WG-1 from 2011 i think, with WG-2 changing to CMOS.
I actually love periscope lenses btw. They are criminally underrated.
Unfortunately the W10 can't do RAW but i went to a vacation with friends just a couple years ago and did some amazing photos with this 15 year old camera.
I have also been on and off using Powershot G2 that you showcased in another video. This one does RAW and exposure bracketing, you can get up to some advanced trickery with this old one.
I instantly went to eBay to see if I could get one but they are all now at like $200 😭
It'll come down again!
I like your sense of humor, please keep it up in your videos.
Cheers!
G9 is a good camera, but do not be deceived. The camera of today's mid-tier smartphone camera will outperform it in every measure. I've seen results from a Galaxy S21 camera that are amazing. The older prosumer cameras have their charm, but they are now technological dinosaurs compared to the modern smartphone.
Very different use cases in my opinion, phone cameras today are great but still so limited in terms of creative manual control even with raw formats and third party camera apps. The closest are Sony's smartphones
@@GeorgeHolden To me the real technical advantage of yesteryear's compact cameras are ergonomics and the viewfinder (if there is one).
I got one after watching your videos on this camera..now I'm obsessed!! I'm not going anywhere without my canon g9 lol
That's great to hear!
the ulysses aoki school of writing clickbait titles
At least my pricing is accurate
@@GeorgeHolden is now after you’ve made a vid about it
I had a G2 for a while back in the mid-aughts, and back then I was actually shooting paying jobs with it, and had happy clients. They were surprisingly capable little cameras.
It really is a pocket rocket!
For anyone thinking this is a copy - here's my first video from May 2022 that started my series on budget cameras with titles just like this:
ruclips.net/video/kWSwZOnCV9w/видео.html
Also, 📸 Get £20 off Your Order at MPB with this Referral Link (not sponsored, just a bonus!) mention-me.com/m/ol/ks6rn-george-holden
Just found this and followed you and you’ve inspired me to dig out my canon G1X which has laid unused in a drawer for about four years and I will go out and give it a go 😮
g11 is much better. don't get the g10
So enjoyed your video. Did a lot of traveling over the years and around 2010 or so I decided that dragging a canon 20d plus lenses was getting out of hand. I didn’t get the G9 but the G10. I used that on cruises etc and loved it . Then I upgraded to the G12 with articulating screen until it failed after a few years and went for the last in the line…G16. I still have it and use it for family gatherings since travel has been curtailed due to wife’s health. The G16 feels so familiar in hand and produces lovely images.
And by the way I have only just discovered MFT and I invested in a PEN -F silver beauty. It feels like I have an old film camera look with all the latest mirrorless features.
Keep up the good work.
Thanks again…Joe McGrath
Thanks for sharing Joe!
this camera makes zero film photos
My first digital camera was a Canon G2. I'm still pleased with the quality of those shots I took all those years ago. It had a great lens and if you could keep the ISO low or moderate and avoid blowing highlights it was at least as good as using medium or high speed 35mm film. Film and digital were still competing at the time!
Thanks for this video. I just bought one for double the price you mentioned but I wanted something for my upcoming trip to Italy that was more compact than my Sony A7r3 and less cumbersome than my film camera. Among the current point and shoot digicams everyone is pushing, this seemed like great quality at a decent price point. I'm really excited.
I still own a Nikon Coolpix 995 from 2001, which produces images somewhat akin to yours, though with a more modest 3MP resolution. However, I must acknowledge the distinct difference in the quality of noise between retro analog film cameras and their early digital counterparts, not just technically but also aesthetically. Film grain has a certain charm-consistent and visually pleasing-while the noise from old digital cameras tends to be harsher, less appealing, and often riddled with chromatic fringing.
I own several Fujifilm mirrorless cameras (X-T20, X0T2 & X-Pro1) plus lenses. I recently purchased an older small Fuji. A less know X-M1. It's a cool little camera and well suited for street photography. The only drawback is the lack of a view finder, although it has a tilt screen. I also own a Canon S90 point and shoot. It's cool and can be shot in completely manual mode. It's big drawback is it is so small and hard to hold.
I hear you on that. The X pro 1 is currently on my radar as a street camera but looking at manual lenses instead
S90/95 just slap some grip and it's instantly easier to hold one hand
This camera Is so good! One year ago I started getting interested into photography, one day I went to eat to my aunt's and I asked her about what should I start with (she's been a professional wedding photographer for the past 30 years), she stood up went to her room and brought a box with a powershot G7 in it (same year as this one, but 10mp) she told me she was getting rid of it, but I could give it a second life.
Man! I've been so happy with this camera. For the past year I've shoot thousands and thousands of photos. In all conditions and in all kind of places. I know it's very rudimentary haha but I know every little trick it can give you and this camera will not lett you down.
Now I am looking to upgrade to a mirrorless, but this camera will always have a special place in my heart.
Thanks so much for sharing, I love these cameras getting a second lease of life with enthusiastic owners! They don't deserve to simply collect dust on a shelf
You made me pick one up! Just got one in mint condition, will all the accessories & spare batteries for £65.. bargain!
Super excited to test out this little beast!
Great deal!
I recently bought a G12. It’s the perfect mix. A jack of all trades type.
Thanks for sharing!
The G9 was my camera for a few years when it came out. Took a lot of nice photos with it and got a kick out of the time lapse feature on it which I'd use quite often. Really bad with indoor low light but what camera of that type wasn't. This video reminded me that I had a lot of photos from that time that I just shot in or converted to B&W because of that bad grain to just make it look like film.
Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for this George 👍 I bought one new in 2007 and still use it regularly. Love the size, weight and the pictures coming out of it. I’ll prefer it often to my 35mm, M43 and full frame cameras when travelling or doing street photography. Wonderful camera! Thanks for the CCD info. I didn’t know that.
I'm about to buy this G9 this week, I will leave my personal feedback here soon after the weekends that might be useful for those to plan to have this tiny chunk.
Get on with it
CMOS was chosen over CCD because of bandwidth struggles of CCD. you couldn't effectively go over 10 megapixel on CCD on sensor size, bandwidth would choke up, so they went with CMOS. Backside illuminated CMOS minimizes rolling shutter and stacked as well but the price for them are significantly higher than normal cmos.
Thanks for the info!
I bought one of these new in 2007. I still use it now, and have taken more photos with this than my DSLR. It takes up less space so more likely to carry when not going out specifically to photograph stuff. I also have the filter attachment/ telephoto lens. That rarely got used.
That's great to hear!
One camera that I'd also recommend is the Sony Cybershot dsc-w290 due to the similar features with a 12.1 megapixel sensor. The one I own has most of the same picture setting but it's all made into a digital interface instead of tactile scrolls. Also pertaining to comments about prices being more than said in the video, other places will have different demand and supply of products. you May be able to find them really cheap somewhere those cameras are tossed around like e-waste. In most of America, these older cameras are sought after for an authentic old digicam quality of photos.
I’ve gotta get one of these!! Thank you .
I just ordered a Olympus c3000 for my street photography. It gets here Monday I can’t wait.
Thanks for watching!
Thanks to videos like this they're now 2x to 4x the price now. Hard to find under $200.
Your reason is same as mine why I shifted from DSLR to mirrorless is that I can use mirrorless camera much like shooting with my smart phone without thinking much about the settings and just enjoy photography. Shooting in live view is mirrorless (along with small digicams and smart phones) major advantage over DSLR where autofocus speed and focus hunting is a real pain in most DSLR when shooting in live view! Nowadays I use shutter priority mode mainly for sports and fast action events like fashion shows, and "P" (Programmed Automatic) mode adjusting just the + and - exposure compensation when shooting easy subjects like daylight street candid activities and nature landscapes. Digital camera nowadays can be very smart that makes you a lazy from traditional film photographers' point of view, but that's not the point really! You shoot photos because you enjoy doing it and that should be your main reason why you're into photography. Image quality should come naturally as long as you know how to use your camera, that is you decide what to shoot based on your keen eye then let the camera do the processing. This should be the basis of photographer - camera relationship in my point of view. This is why most people use smart phones nowadays as point-and-shoot camera thingy for convenience and portability.
BTW: I still bring with me my 12 year old Nikon P300 wherever I go when I need a good camera I can fish out of my pocket because it can zoom in optically up to 100 mm in full resolution that my smart phone usually crops in digital zoom.
That's great to hear and love that the Nikon P300 is still getting some use!
@@aaronmoore3050 zooming in and out is all about composing your shots. It is the most important thing for me because I shoot fashion shows and modeling where shooting close-up headshot to wide angle full body is very tiring when I have to move closer and farther just to get the shot that I need. Plus the fact that models faraway from the stage/ catwalk cannot be shot with just a single focal length if you're shooting wide group shots then instantly switch to close-up shot of just a single model's face. No single focal length prime lens can do that. So instead of cropping it out and recomposing with Photoshop, I prefer to do it in-camera zooming in with my lens. Image quality just comes in second, that's why I bring my Yongnuo LED lights and PAR lights with me to illuminate the scene.when needed in low light conditions. But still, composition comes first whenever practical and comfortable as possible where zooming in and out is just one of the process. Then you'll be a winner when you slay the shots!
@@aaronmoore3050 the point in all this photographing thing is that you enjoy what you do. This is what I call a leisure job where work and play go hand-in-hand. I shoot anything from animals and wildlife, travel and nature, architectural, experimental, food, products, sports... and the list would go on and on as I do all types of photography although fashion and showbiz photography is my bread and butter at the moment. I started as a photojournalist and a feature correspondent in a newspaper during the final decade of film photography in 1998 (I have a bachelor's degree in Broadcast Communications so landing a job in a newspaper isn't that hard). But I ended up shooting fashion shows when I started shooting models for my portrait paintings and visual art work, and eventually managing and handling talents since 2003. In fact, my purpose in creating my RUclips channel in 2008 was primarily for talents promotion. Yes, like you I don't really like heavy make-up which makes preteens looked like an adult. But there's nothing we could do if styling and make-over are needed in cosplay and glamour themes. But in my observation there are great stylists and make-up artists out there who could really bring out the character and personality of the models so I just let them be. After all a model's job is to portray the character she was asked to do and carry the dresses and costumes well so people would buy the product she endorses.... But if really be given the chance, I would love to land a job at National Geographic magazine because nature and wildlife photography really is my first love, along with travel photography which I enjoyed the most.
@@aaronmoore3050 also it is said that camera is just a tool and it is the photographer who creates the photograph with his keen senses. I confer with that. So I don't fiddle much with the settings but rather just look at the LCD live view of my mirrorless, dial the correct exposure and compose the shot. When I like what I see on the LCD monitor then I click on the shutter button, as simple as that. If some shots failed for whatever reason there's always Photoshop to correct them anyway. As long as I get the proper exposure with good details and sharpness then clients will be happy. Most clients wouldn't mind a little bit of grain noise anyway, but they surely will get mad if you give them blurry shots because you choose a slow shutter speed to prioritize a low ISO, or failed to use the proper autofocus points that the lens back focuses on the subject. In the end, you cannot fault the camera by itself but your shooting workflow. You must come up with your own shooting techniques because no single camera setting can be used for all kinds of subjects and scenes with varying lighting conditions. But you will not go wrong with Program Auto, Shutter Priority, and Aperture Priority with Auto ISO modes. These functionality are there to make the job easier so you'll just think of composing the shots than fiddle with manual settings not very useful or applicable in sports and wildlife (birds in-flight for example where busy background and lighting condition always vary that you don't have the time to dial manual settings while maintaining your fast moving subject inside the frame).
@@aaronmoore3050 All those PASM settings have their own uses depending on the level of your expertise. What worked for me might not work for you and vice versa so there's no right or wrong in this discussion. But I only mentioned the most convenient shooting modes that I am comfortable with based on my preference, and these preferences vary per photographer. Also, I know my personal settings and I don't usually lend my main camera to others. And even if someone did change the settings on my camera in an event I know how to change it back and return to my personal camera settings because mastery of my own camera is a prerogative for me before I use it for professional use ( I do a lot of gadget testing and dry run before using it in paid jobs. I practice shooting at home and in my backyard). So camera settings is not an issue for me as long as I use the familiar settings that are most convenient for the types of subject that I shoot under a particular lighting condition. But shooting it right based on the output displayed in the LCD preview is very important for me that's why I do test shots and showing them to client before I proceed to the photoshoot session. If I failed a shot, then I recompose and re-shoot the scene immediately with a different setting. I never mentioned having fun, but I did mentioned "enjoying" what I do otherwise I wouldn't last two decades of doing my job if I get bored in the process. Yes I get stressed sometimes with work schedules, ever changing industry standards and the likes but it does not justify reasons to quit because I do love my job and photography really is my passion along with painting, portraiture and digital art. If people are happy with my shots then I get paid reasonably. If I get confronted with failed shots then I learn from my mistakes and either change my shooting techniques or upgrade to better gears. Watching RUclips tutorials are great references, but I develop my own shooting techniques as soon as I get the hang of it upgrading my skills and know-how in the process. That's all there is to "having fun" if you put it that way, but no need to buy an xbox as I'm not a gamer, LoL!