USS Vancouver - Detailed Look

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
  • Main Website:
    www.trekyards.com
    Support Trekyards on Patreon:
    / community
    PayPal Support via: trekyards@hotmail.com
    Want cool Trekyards Merchandise? Check out our TeeSpring store:
    teespring.com/...
    Trekyards on Twitter:
    / trekyards
    Trekyards Discord Server: / discord
    Eaglemoss Link: click.linksyne...
    Discount Code: TREKYARDS10 for 10% off your order
    Star Trek Mission Crate discount link: lootcrate.com/t...
    Discount code: TREKYARDS to save 10% off your order
    Other RUclips Channel:
    Captain Foley's Channel
    / @stuartfoleycaptainfoley
    Social Media:
    Trekyards on Twitter:
    / trekyards
    Main Trekyards Facebook Page:
    / trekyards
    Main Fleetyards Facebook Page:
    / fleetyards
    Trekyards Model Building Showcase Facebook Page:
    / 525656090901951
    Team Trekyards Star Trek Online Facebook Group:
    / teamtrekyards
    Star Trek Timelines (Trekyards Facebook Team Page):
    / 836643756447057

Комментарии • 261

  • @vovacat1797
    @vovacat1797 4 года назад +117

    Guys, it's an engineering ship, isn't it? Imagine it tractoring a space station the size of DS9, you kinda really need those huge ass impulse engines then. Probably ridiculously overpowered for the ship itself though. But so is a semi-truck without a trailer

    • @Tezunegari
      @Tezunegari 4 года назад +26

      And whenever Parliament class ships meet, they find the nearest asteroid belt, tractor some asteroids, and do a drag race... just because their Captains have to measure their... "impulse torque".

    • @avragetrinidadian3787
      @avragetrinidadian3787 4 года назад +1

      Modern Ptolemy class tug?

  • @eriklundstrom1336
    @eriklundstrom1336 4 года назад +34

    I love that we got these really beautiful ships which really show that the Cerritos is a kit-bashed take. Its purposely not a hero ship its the back of the line ship. The tug boat. I love it.

    • @krim7
      @krim7 Год назад

      That’s why the Cerritos is so great! I love it!

  • @roscuro1787
    @roscuro1787 4 года назад +63

    When I look at the USS Cerritos, I get a vibe of mass production. We need a fleet of ships to go and perform basic functions and we need a lot of them. So every part is modular. The pylons are mass produced and stacked beside the shipyard waiting to be bolted onto the saucer. The warp core ejection system is complicated and takes extra time to build into the frame of the saucer, lets throw it into the a separate module and just put explosive bolts to separate the ship from it. Do the bussard collectors really need the protective shell around them? The California-class just screams cut corners in production that make a ship very easy to produce. Would also explain why you can be stuck in the maintenance tubes for days. There are probably more than turbo shafts connecting the warp core/deflector pod to the saucer.

    • @artemisiatheta7549
      @artemisiatheta7549 4 года назад +10

      The California-class reminds me of the Yeager-class. It gives me the vibes of a Dominion War-Era ship thrown together from spare parts and after the war given a spit polish and kept in production for a while due to the depletion of the fleet. They compressed everything they needed to run the ship into the available space and put the ensigns out in the hallway because, heck, who needs individual quarters during wartime.
      Take one part New Orleans-class saucer, two Disco Connie pylons, a slightly beefed up mission pod from somewhere, and some cut-rate nacelles. Throw them out so that they can support the fleet and keep them going after the war. Heck, the state of the Cerritos even lends to the idea that this is an older slapdash ship.

    • @TheKulu42
      @TheKulu42 4 года назад +5

      I think you've hit the nail on the head there. The Liberty freighters built during World War II were constructed in mass with that very design philosophy in mind. Parts of California-class ships are waiting back at various orbital yards ready to use. Starfleet needed lots of ships for basic duties, so the shipwrights created a simple design that's easy to manufacture and maintain.

    • @SMunro
      @SMunro 4 года назад +1

      You are suggesting a decline in post scarcity economics where less resources are being expended on starfleet during the Ceritos period, yet a return to majestic starships for the Vancouver.

    • @roscuro1787
      @roscuro1787 4 года назад +5

      @@SMunro Maybe, remember there are some resources that can't be replicated or are very difficult to do so. My main reasoning isn't about resources, its about time. We're trying to build a lot of ships very quickly.

    • @SMunro
      @SMunro 4 года назад +1

      @@roscuro1787 so the Ceritos is a bare-bones ship built to evac Romulans? But the Vancouver is a longterm investment of resources. Its obvious there is a resource availability leap between Ceritos-class and Vancouver-class.

  • @Evil.Totoro
    @Evil.Totoro 4 года назад +48

    It’s not weird at all for having a similar interior from one class of ship to another. A real world example was the Titanic, her design and machinery were new, but her interior styling was Identical to older White Star Line ships, just bigger.

    • @adamlemus7585
      @adamlemus7585 4 года назад +5

      Evil Totoro
      Dude! You have any idea how happy I am to see someone who knows that? People think the titanic was on the cutting edge of design and technology! Best way I try to explain it is the Titanic was a 1993 Cadillac fleetwood sedan while the Conrad ships were like 1993 Mercedes Benz S 500.

    • @TheMrPeteChannel
      @TheMrPeteChannel 4 года назад

      Yeah but these ships are supposed to be "years apart." Unless the Parliament class is a replacement 4 the California class then the bridges should look somewhat different.

    • @Evil.Totoro
      @Evil.Totoro 4 года назад +3

      Mr. Pete Channel needs 800 subbies! My point still stands, Titanic was years, if not decades apart from ships with similar interiors. Also, I have been onboard an early build Ticonderoga Class cruiser, as well as a flight 2 Burke Class Destroyer, and to an untrained eye, they look very similar as well, though being several decades apart. Good upkeep, and refits will do that.

    • @TheMrPeteChannel
      @TheMrPeteChannel 4 года назад

      @@Evil.Totoro ok then 🖖

    • @JeffreyPiatt
      @JeffreyPiatt 4 года назад +2

      @@TheMrPeteChannel It's a reference to live action trek and how the bridge sets get recycled for lots of classes with new displays. The TMP refit Bridge saw use as so many other ships starting in WOK as the Relient Bridge.

  • @afghanvet0959
    @afghanvet0959 4 года назад +45

    Think Vancouvers hull looks more Enterprise E while Cerritos looks like Enterprise D

    • @zero_gravity5861
      @zero_gravity5861 4 года назад +5

      More like C to D.

    • @Nowhereman10
      @Nowhereman10 4 года назад +3

      Reminds me more of a step towards the Odyssey-class Enterprise-F than E.

    • @good_teanice_house6789
      @good_teanice_house6789 4 года назад

      Nowhereman10 I thought the same thing.

    • @zero_gravity5861
      @zero_gravity5861 4 года назад +3

      Yeah, I can see that.

    • @chrissonofpear1384
      @chrissonofpear1384 4 года назад +1

      @@Nowhereman10 It also seems like a New Orleans class mated with a Centaur-class to create a stocky little baby ship...

  • @RichieAppel
    @RichieAppel 4 года назад +29

    I love how the Vancouver slides right in and eclipses the Cerritos.

  • @vincentwong5173
    @vincentwong5173 4 года назад +8

    OMG! The shuttle is named Marpole, a very specific neighborhood in Vancouver only a local would recognize! ❤️❤️❤️!

    • @pyRoy6
      @pyRoy6 4 года назад

      and Kitsilano and Fairview!

  • @toddwalker4301
    @toddwalker4301 4 года назад +18

    I love the design!!! Very aesthetically pleasing to the eyes in proportion. I like the darker hall it appears to have! Whoever designed this new ship should have been in charge of designing the fleet ships for Picard!

  • @mathewdefreitas4510
    @mathewdefreitas4510 4 года назад +18

    The Vancouver saucer, especially the top, reminds me of the sovereign class saucer.

  • @zero_gravity5861
    @zero_gravity5861 4 года назад +19

    The nacelles are totally different. The only similarity is a line down the middle.

  • @Vdubb
    @Vdubb 4 года назад +6

    I think the Cerritos looks like it was made more around the same time as Enterprise C. Combine that with the odd looks and it makes fit more into the "misfit/underdog" role i think they're going for. While the Vancouver is a "modern" ship with all the bells and whistles and something all of Starfleet would love to serve on.

  • @LanLe-rz4lm
    @LanLe-rz4lm 4 года назад +8

    Hey, Eugene Roddenberry is the Executive Producer! It would be great to have him on a Trekyards episode to express his influence in keeping Trek alive & well; perhaps if he's doing his part to try to keep things close to Gene's vision! The impulse engines, like the TOS and other vessels, are 2 decks high, so they are about the normal size for an impulse engine, but they are more extended from the main hull, like an Excelsior class, that's all.

  • @lykan2
    @lykan2 4 года назад +8

    "It's using the same saucer"
    .....except it doesn't? the only thing thats similiar are these cutouts, but otherwise the saucer is quite different and also the entire configuration of the ship so i do not see it as a "updated" California but a new Ship Class.

  • @Janoha17
    @Janoha17 4 года назад +8

    The Parliament Class looks like a cross between the Luna Class and STO's Reliant Class.

  • @seanoneill9606
    @seanoneill9606 4 года назад +15

    To me it seems to be a transitional ship from the TNG design era and the First Contact fleet. It has elements of both design styles.

    • @chrissonofpear1384
      @chrissonofpear1384 4 года назад +3

      Though contemporaneous to the USS Galaxy (circa 2357/60)

    • @alexhurlbut
      @alexhurlbut 4 года назад +2

      it also has the same nacelle style as the Exeter from Star Trek Online.

  • @terrywest111
    @terrywest111 4 года назад +5

    The Parliament class ship looks awesome. I loved it. But did anyone else notice the CANON OLYMPIC CLASS SHIP that Mariner served on before, when they did the TNG movie uniform scene?

  • @martins.4240
    @martins.4240 4 года назад +6

    This ship is great! Happy to see a real TNG style ship after so long.
    This looks like a mix between the Akira, Miranda & Luna classes.

  • @SignoftheMagi
    @SignoftheMagi 4 года назад +5

    If you wanted to emphasize the show being about incompetence....yeah the junky looking California-class works. But the Parliament-class simply fits the era better...even as far back as the TNG era. It looks nicer, the design makes more sense, and the interior being the same is not a take away. Just works better..

  • @Al-rf6xw
    @Al-rf6xw Год назад +2

    I was recently googleing my old ship uss vancouver lpd 2 (a amphibious ship) I was surprised to see both my ship , and now a star ship with the same name , now I can tell my kids I trekked around the world and the universe on the "van-can-do" when I was in the navy. how cool is that

  • @TheKulu42
    @TheKulu42 4 года назад +2

    I think the Cerritos has a cost-cutter look to her, which is fine. Designed to be easy to build, easy to maintain, and easier to replace than the big Galaxy-class and other higher-end starships. And it looks like there's plenty of space between the engines and the main hull for big cargo modules, etc.

  • @adamlemus7585
    @adamlemus7585 4 года назад +11

    What I wasn’t to see is a California Class Star Ship named USS Barstow that’s used as a threat to Star Fleet Officers. Like “Do that again Ensign and you’ll be sweeping halls on the Barstow”

    • @beejcarson
      @beejcarson 4 года назад

      I don’t know, I hear the Fresno is worse.

    • @adamlemus7585
      @adamlemus7585 4 года назад +3

      Beej
      Fresno would be bad but Star Fleet would have a hell of a time finding crew members that can pass a drug screening to man the bridge. That ship would be the only one in the fleet where Heisenberg blue sky is on the replicator menu.

    • @petergray2712
      @petergray2712 4 года назад +1

      @@beejcarson Welcome to the USS Weed. (Seriously, there is a Weed, California by Mount Shasta)

    • @crhu319
      @crhu319 3 года назад +1

      A sewage scow, the Harcourt Fenton Mudd.

    • @MrRurounismc
      @MrRurounismc 3 года назад

      @@beejcarson Worse than the Bakersfield? (I am a local lol)

  • @sw-gs
    @sw-gs 4 года назад +5

    Scale looks strange. We know that from outside walk of Rutherford on the saucer rim of Cerritos windows are size of people standing, so windows on Vancouver are three times bigger.

  • @bcluett1697
    @bcluett1697 4 года назад +6

    I can't accept "kitbash" with Vancouver. Tie-in yes. Design style yes. The parts beyond the nacelles and the fact it has a saucer is similar but not even the same and there are a lot of new parts. The escape pod flub nw makes me far more satisfied with the bottom lol. I was thinking it was Universe class windows or something. Also at this size the saucer edge windows make more sense. Good luck Eaglemoss you're job isn't getting any easier.

  • @generalmehk
    @generalmehk 4 года назад +3

    From the underside with the underslung navigational deflector the way it connects the Saucer section Reminds me of the star trek online Odyssey class.

  • @stevenewman1393
    @stevenewman1393 Год назад +1

    🖖😎👍love the Vancouver it's a very beautiful ship indeed, I was going to order it from Eaglemoss but then they went out of business. Also I'm not a big fan of the Cerritos it's just such a dorky looking ship and the stupidity of putting the registry on the back of the saucer only just looks lame 😒.

  • @frankb3347
    @frankb3347 4 года назад +1

    In my mind this should be the Cascadia Class. That would balance very nicely with the California Class. It also avoids having to decide if it's named after Vancouver BC or Vancouver WA.

  • @terifarley4770
    @terifarley4770 4 года назад +3

    One of the best ship designs out in a longtime for canon!

  • @e.l.wallace9060
    @e.l.wallace9060 4 года назад +1

    I hope the ships from lower decks come to STO specfilly the Vancouver.

  • @davidhernandez9985
    @davidhernandez9985 4 года назад +1

    It.s Akria cruiser-class the U.S.S.Vancover is but I like the Nebula class is slightly better & faster.

  • @hogfry
    @hogfry 2 года назад +1

    If the parliament is meant to serve as a major engineering project ship it kinda make sense for her to have massive impulse engines.
    She probably has to tow station sized objects and structures.

  • @thegalli
    @thegalli 4 года назад +1

    I feel like the Cerritos (California Class) design is directly contemporary with the Galaxy, probably being constructed just after the Galaxy line started shakedowns, so right in the early 2360s, which would make the ship 15-20 years old by the time of Lower Decks. Add the tidbit that MM says that the Cerritos has undergone a couple of refits over its time.

  • @stevenkuski5916
    @stevenkuski5916 4 года назад +1

    i guess that some time in the next few hundred years Victoria is destroyed by an earthquake or something, after which they moved the capital of BC to Vancouver. then it makes sense that the Parliament class ships would be named after cities that contain parliaments.

  • @dswynne
    @dswynne 4 года назад +3

    I think that the California-class has the type of ship design that could readily be mass-produced as a basic patrol vessel.

    • @beejcarson
      @beejcarson 4 года назад +2

      The next Miranda, it’s going to be around for a century.

    • @TheKulu42
      @TheKulu42 4 года назад +1

      I think you're right. She's Starfleet's answer to the Liberty ships built during World War II. Easy to mass produce and maintain.

  • @nbc_uk
    @nbc_uk 4 года назад +2

    Samuel - surely an engineering ship would probably need rather large impulse engines?

  • @ADivineFellow
    @ADivineFellow 3 года назад +1

    The cerritos is the underapreciated workhorse of the fleet, its a good change of pace from always focusing on yhe top of the line best ship possible that the other series are about

  • @donaldserna-grey5022
    @donaldserna-grey5022 4 года назад +3

    The holographic display table seems to be more an evolution of the stellar cartography and astrophysics lab seen in the TNG episode Lessons from season 6 in my opinion.

  • @thoruszwolf4153
    @thoruszwolf4153 4 года назад +1

    I think it looks awesome.... not quite as good as the Akira Class, but very close to it on my top ten list

  • @veeot_dragon300
    @veeot_dragon300 4 года назад +1

    i have to say i like it, then again it does have those Miranda vibes and the Miranda is my absolute favorite trek ship

  • @AvgeekJoe
    @AvgeekJoe 4 года назад +1

    Parliament Class is way better than California Class! But I'd name this ship the USS Victoria as it's Victoria, BC that has the Parliament and NOT Vancouver, BC!

    • @avenuePad
      @avenuePad 4 года назад

      Well, BC is a province, so it has a legislature in Victoria, not a parliament. It's Ottawa that has Parliament.

  • @seanmooney5966
    @seanmooney5966 4 года назад +1

    Great looking trek ship well done lower decks great job

  • @russellwarren9595
    @russellwarren9595 3 года назад +1

    I really love how the Cerritos looks like a kitbash that is meant for something far off in the background.

  • @One_Bar
    @One_Bar 4 года назад +2

    I enjoy the Excelsior to TNG crossovers, though. The Cerritos has an Oberth feel to it. One of the reasons I like the New Frontier novels, with updating the Excal to the A.

  • @MoonjumperReviews
    @MoonjumperReviews 4 года назад +1

    Two thumbs up 👍 for the Vancouver-named for a city I used to live in. Home away from my Texas home! I also loved seeing a continuity flashback in this episode to the First Contact/late DS9 uniforms. Lower Decks did not ignore them! It is really great seeing a generation 3 Trek series un which the showrunners, in this case, Mike McMahan, have actually WATCHED Star Trek! What a breath of fresh air! (Seeing the Olympic-class docked at DS9 was cool, too!!)

  • @geneiwanskijr5957
    @geneiwanskijr5957 4 года назад +1

    I like the design of the parliament class. It's very sleek and very streamlined.

  • @MgaTalunanKayo
    @MgaTalunanKayo 4 года назад +3

    Looks like an Odyssey/Centaur variant.

  • @colanitower
    @colanitower 4 года назад +2

    I like the "too good" speculation. Similar to Volkswagen when they came up with their first Passat: That's too luxurious to be the best successor to the workman's Beetle, we need something simpler. The VW Golf, and the rest is history.

  • @good_teanice_house6789
    @good_teanice_house6789 4 года назад +2

    Helmsman: Captain, we are entering the planets orbit.
    Captain: Ok good, park it over top of the Cerritos.
    Lol 😂

  • @andrewlucas5226
    @andrewlucas5226 4 года назад +1

    loved the shuttle craft called Marpol named after the suburb in Vancouver.

    • @pyRoy6
      @pyRoy6 4 года назад

      And Kitsilano, and Fairview...maybe more?

  • @ControlDenied307
    @ControlDenied307 4 года назад +1

    I miss ships with upswept nacelles.

  • @leonielson7138
    @leonielson7138 4 года назад +1

    The Parliament-class looks like an update of how the Miranda-class was supposed to look (roll-bar on the bottom, the deflector dish instead of a torpedo bay) except that the nacelles are pointing down instead of up, which invokes the Akira-class.

  • @ARMOROID5000
    @ARMOROID5000 4 года назад

    I agree. I think this Vancouver ship should have been used for the show.
    The USS. Cheetos is just gosh ugly with those long assed struts. Why would they even have those? From an engineering stand point, long thin and spindly means big stress points for material failure. Not to mention, *Just fracking ugly!!!*

  • @beejcarson
    @beejcarson 4 года назад +1

    Great new ship design.

  • @zzeegermantube
    @zzeegermantube 4 года назад +1

    Agree with the Cpt, it looks just fine and better than the Cerritos. Class name is fine too.

  • @MedalionDS9
    @MedalionDS9 4 года назад

    I participate on another Trek channel... The 7Th Rule... and I asked the question about why this ship is named the USS Vancouver... apparently it's a reference to the fact their animation studio, Titmouse, is based in Vancouver, Canada.

  • @jodecideion
    @jodecideion 4 года назад

    I will give you guys this you cover all things Trek! Even the horrible stuff! LLAP

  • @aped3
    @aped3 4 года назад +1

    Is this Ship Cannon ???

  • @springtime1838
    @springtime1838 4 года назад +1

    Maybe in Star Traks Universes there was a HMCS Parliament like there was a USS Congress maybe a joint Project

  • @PicardManeuver
    @PicardManeuver 4 года назад +1

    I bet the Cerritos can dock with the Vancouver for larger missions- look at the dark space on the bottom of the saucer with no windows, it's the perfect size and shape.

  • @GUTOMOFFICIAL
    @GUTOMOFFICIAL 3 года назад

    Didn't know there's a USS Vancouver! That's awesome!

  • @ValosiTiamata
    @ValosiTiamata 4 года назад

    People who hate the Cerritos tend to forget that Utopia Planetia isn't the only manufacturer of Starfleet vessels. When I see it, it reminds me of some small shipyard undercutting a bid to mass produce the California class. The warp engines are very cheap and bulky like you'd expect on a low-end freighter, the warp core is oversized, presumably for supplying power to stations or other ships (hence why it's also likely located in the pod) but also likely due to outdated technology.
    And then you look at the Vancouver, which was obviously built by a larger company on a much higher budget. Since Starfleet vessels require modular design, it makes sense for two different companies to use the same bridge or flight deck module but having very different technology levels in other components.
    We've rarely gotten to see products from different manufacturing companies side by side in the Prime universe outside of Enterprise, so this episode was something of a treat just for that.

  • @deadlymouse7033
    @deadlymouse7033 Год назад

    I like the Parliament much much more than the California Class, it just looks goofy and lazily designed. Though admittedly the California Class is meant as a joke. So in those regards the design is perfect and represents the actual state very well.

  • @Toobeegort
    @Toobeegort 4 года назад +1

    I can see why this ship was not the Cerritos it looks too good and not in step with the show.

  • @EddieDexterStewart
    @EddieDexterStewart 4 года назад

    Would you ask the producer if the USS Cerritos served during The Dominion War? The ship is an old ship and could have served as a emergency supply ship as well as a rescue vessel. It fits that profile. Perhaps Captain Carol served aboard as Captain or as First Officer.

  • @avengersprime5431
    @avengersprime5431 4 года назад

    Although I don’t particularly care for the California class, the Parliament class I actually really like. I hope we get an EagleMoss model in the future.

  • @Iptahal
    @Iptahal 4 года назад

    Does anyone else get very TNG-Era Walker/Georgiou Class configuration vibes from this class? A third variant in STO would be very boss lol.

  • @ffnbbq
    @ffnbbq 4 года назад

    I really hate it when Samuel gets all smugly sperglordy and starts insinuating that a design decision on a fake spaceship was made out of "ape brain" stupidity by people much less qualified than he, an expert of fake spaceship design with pretend technobabble engineering. Mate, you got the show's creator on - don't make it uncomfortable for him because you insulted his creative team.

  • @seanbrown207
    @seanbrown207 4 года назад +1

    I like the look of the Cerritos. I don't think every ship in Starfleet needs to be pretty-looking.
    It's like the difference between an F-16 fighter jet and the A-10 Warthog. The F-16 looks sleek, the A-10 Warthog looks, like, well... a lumpy warthog. Both are USAF ships. But, y'know, what? The A-10 is sooooooooo good at its CAS mission that it's been around since the 1970s and will be around to the 2040s at least (I believe). The A-10 sports old school tech because that old school tech is what makes it so effective.
    I envision the Cerritos similarly. Not pretty looking but it's always been a really effective performer as a utility ship that Starfleet has simply made sensible upgrades but kept much of the original design.

  • @simonboulton1964
    @simonboulton1964 4 года назад +1

    Despite the animation flaws, it's still a cool powerful looking ship.

  • @louisalectube
    @louisalectube 4 года назад

    Wait wait wait , just prior to 12:12 Lower Left Corner Guy (I'm terrible with names) *doesn't* like the ion engines?? But he loves everything with a Star Trek logo on it. o.O

  • @Mnogojazyk
    @Mnogojazyk 4 года назад

    I like both the Parliament class and the California class ships. But I do prefer the Parliament class over the California class. Nonetheless, it strikes me that people must walk on the windows that are on the underside. ;-)

  • @henrykoerner3214
    @henrykoerner3214 4 года назад

    The Cerritos is quite old so its probably gone through a major overhaul once or twice. If you're Starfleet with dozens if not hundreds of these types of ships in need of a refit. Do you overhaul every inch of the ship or only upgrade portions of it? If the pylons and the nacelles do not need to be upgraded to accomplish the ships mission. Why bother with committing those resources to a visual change that doesn't impact performance?
    If the ship is mass produced and is simply expected to be a work-horse that is not the face of the fleet like the flagship or a sign of strength to the federations enemies like a cutting edge combat vessel. It really only needs to have upgrades applied in essential areas like the saucer. So you get this ship that looks like an ugly duckling of the fleet. Because aesthetically its pulling from design philosophies from two different time periods.

  • @johnmiller7682
    @johnmiller7682 4 года назад +1

    I think an explanation for the Vancouver's large impulse drives is that they are not just impulse drives. They are impulse drives AND warp nacelles. So, when and if the saucer section were to separate, it could still go to warp.

  • @DavidKnowles0
    @DavidKnowles0 4 года назад

    For me this look like something was put together to fight the borg or the dominion, big engines, highly maneuverable and compact in design. the narcells better protected. It probably came before voyage but incorporating the second hull and source section.

  • @camerondorsett3590
    @camerondorsett3590 Год назад

    Just saying, I love the Vancouver. One of my new favorite ship designs. I'd love to see a more detailed model.

  • @AlexandarHullRichter
    @AlexandarHullRichter 3 года назад

    The Cerritos looks like a 90s Toyota Hilux that is still being used, while the Vancouver looks like a brand new Toyota Tundra next to it.

  • @AlexandarHullRichter
    @AlexandarHullRichter 3 года назад

    That main systems display is the wrong scale for the exterior windows. The way it looks from the outside, that ship should have at least a dozen decks in the main saucer section. You can see 7 decks worth of windows just from the bottom shot, without even being able to see the top of the ship.

  • @chriseash6497
    @chriseash6497 2 года назад

    I look at the Parliament class as a replacement of the Miranda. It’s to replace the Mirandas lost during the Dominion War who were showing their age. It’s isn’t intended to try new technologies, more of a tried and true technology workhorse.

  • @jameswg13
    @jameswg13 4 года назад

    What the F are you saying. The parliament class looks like first contact era / odyssey era ship where as Cerritos is the old ship that does milk runs near the end of its life.
    It's not a kitbash at all really well designed and seems to be practical reasons for things.
    Really gives me odyssey vibes though

  • @Nowhereman10
    @Nowhereman10 4 года назад +1

    I didn't care that the Vancouver had ample impulse engines. It makes sense if the vessel is designed around engineering tasks and may need the larger, overpowered engines for towing other ships, stations, containers, or even small moons.

  • @TexasCat99
    @TexasCat99 3 года назад

    Don't care for the nacelles. The Cerritos ones look better. How come Cerritos sounds like a bag of chips? Overall, a good ship.

  • @keatscast7434
    @keatscast7434 3 года назад

    I agree, they fill the same role in the fleet, but at different levels. Send the California for the simpler stuff, the Parliament for big boy jobs.

  • @jamesyates3092
    @jamesyates3092 3 года назад

    Vancouver class. I just want to this has a rocking design. I love all of under nacelle design soda class Miranda and so on. Awesome ship.

  • @mrq1701
    @mrq1701 3 года назад

    I think the Cerritos was intentionally made to look silly. It adds to the comedy and humor. I wish the Cerritos looked like the Vancouver

  • @dantles
    @dantles 3 года назад

    I want it in star trek online game, my hope is they make it in to the game but in Zen store and not one more promo pack shit

  • @shawnbeckmann1847
    @shawnbeckmann1847 4 года назад +1

    Other than having far too many windows the Vancouver is a great-looking ship

  • @madmonkee6757
    @madmonkee6757 2 года назад

    So the Vancouver is a slightly crappier Nebula Class. So noted.

  • @shadowstate552
    @shadowstate552 4 года назад

    I don't like the windows on lower side of the saucer on these TNG-era ships - they are literally on the floor of the rooms. Kinda weird.

  • @Land967
    @Land967 3 года назад

    Huh, soon as I saw the Vancouver I thought it was just a newer version of the Centaur class. quite surprised no-one else thought of that either

  • @katlynklassen809
    @katlynklassen809 3 года назад

    A rose by any other name. Like how voyager was an exploration ship with a bunch of weapons.

  • @angelescobar144
    @angelescobar144 3 года назад

    trekyards: the parliment class looks like a tng era ship
    me: wut? i thought it looked more like the odyssey class

  • @hankdetroit2076
    @hankdetroit2076 9 месяцев назад

    The Cerritos is a better looking ship than the Intrepid class or Voyager...

  • @Kaiber_Phoenix
    @Kaiber_Phoenix 4 года назад

    Its looks like a modern kit bash and i like it a little mix of new and old and was that intro music from ST legacy it sounded familiar

  • @mossomchum
    @mossomchum 3 года назад

    I love that they named the shuttles after actual neighbourhoods in Vancouver!

  • @jonathonearl482
    @jonathonearl482 4 года назад

    USS Vancouver vs. USS Titan. Which design is better?

  • @LancetFencing
    @LancetFencing 4 года назад

    No it’s the same period they serve different purposes it’s not an upgrade it’s just a different class

  • @bioglassmusic
    @bioglassmusic 4 года назад

    noticed the shuttle called kitsilano which is a suburb of Vancouver BC

  • @avragetrinidadian3787
    @avragetrinidadian3787 4 года назад

    Not gonna lie, was getting a Ptolemy class vibe from this ship.

  • @S1nwar
    @S1nwar 3 года назад

    in your hallway opening you forgot to put a lighteffect on some strips next to the holodeck door

  • @ozziemederos
    @ozziemederos 4 года назад +1

    And it’s also has Canadian food on the other ship which Made super captain Foley Foley Foley very happy

  • @andycooper6085
    @andycooper6085 4 года назад +1

    The Engineer whose project it was to build the T88 scanner was on the Vancouver? Or the Vancouver is Beta-testing them?

    • @Hartzilla2007
      @Hartzilla2007 4 года назад +1

      They're a hero ship, they always get the new toys first.