Very nice comparison! I use both Fuji and Nikon and I pretty much feel just like you- I prefere the more subtle colours and contrast of the Nikon + the ability to get thinner depth of field. It´s actually quite funny- I´ve been using Fujifilm professionally for some three years but I still couldn´t say I love the colours :) When I look at a Nikon file it always looks much more natural to me. But I love the Fujifilm system as a whole and that´s why I still use it. However, I went to Nikon for wildlife- Fuji just don´t have the lenses, yet. (and I had the 100-400mm...)
I couldn’t agree more Petr, colour management is something that tends to get left behind on the gear debate. Functions are always talked about, but what the delivered image looks like is pretty important. Maybe it’s because it’s easily corrected in post, or even that you can set the camera up to correct it to your colour taste. That’s where being a pro v amateur is different. Correcting one or two images from a shoot is one thing, but if I’ve been shooting all day for a brochure then hand correcting 400 images is not high on my to do list 🤣 and that I suppose, is why I shoot Nikon. Thanks for watching and commenting, I really appreciate it 👏😊
the weight between my d700 with that lense and my oly em1 with a modern tele zoom is insane for my spine :D. but the images i get with the nikon setup is just da bomb.
I have both. I have also used the Nikkor adapted to fuji XT series cameras and the Xpro2 giving a luscious and fast 120-300mm range. I prefer the nikkor because I think it renders tones better for Black and white and I can use it with my 35mm SLR Film cameras. I also prefer the full frame depth of field you get at 200mm compared with 140mm on a crop. It edges it on sharpness, colour and micro contrast. However the colour differences are much more subtle when using the lenses on the same camera. But I still really like the fuji, it feels significantly lighter, it has optical stabilisation which is nice in low light, particularly for me since none of my cameras have IBIS. The autofocus is quiet and snappy, and works on my fuji cameras, whereas the autofocus for the nikkor is good, it only works with my D4, and that's quite a big camera to lug around all day with a big hefty lens. Both have their use.
Also regarding the DOF, the shallower depth of field from the nikkor has nothing to do with the sensor size. It's because F2.8 at 200mm gives a shallower DOF than 140mm at F2.8. If you put the Nikkor on the Fuji you get the exact same DOF on the x-trans crop as it does on a Full Frame, however it's cropped out of the centre so the focal range appears longer. It's very easy to test, just switch your fx camera to crop mode, the DOF doesn't change, just the field of view.
Interesting video. I went from shooting a Nikon D500 to a Fuji X-T4. For me, it was an upgrade. Though the D500 is still by far the best APS-C DSLR ever made. I do understand the mirror box click you mentioned is definitely true, though you do get used to the feel as your friend said and there is movement when you take a shot, just not as much. The advantage of the IBIS is also much more noticeable when you shoot. At the end of the day, I can see why you would stick with Nikon. The colors out of camera from Nikon is amazing and underrated. If I decided to stick with Nikon, I probably would have went with the newer Z7ii, because the IBIS is definitely worth it. Batteries are getting better with Mirrorless cameras, so that’s definitely starting to go out the door. Your friends Fuji has the older batteries, so I’m not surprised he drained a battery so quickly. X-T4 has the newer batteries that last quite a long time.
Hi Daniel, thank you for your comments they are most welcome and it’s great to get some detailed views from a photographer with personal experience of both brands. The batteries will be better on the newer Fuji, that’s a great point. I still found that when shooting with the Nikon Z6ii (review on my channel) the mirrorless batteries were nowhere near as long lasting, I guess it’s the EVF, but technology will soon catch up, and the batteries will soon be much better. I agree about the Nikon colour rendition, it seems to often be overlooked. The older D3s (also a review on my channel) had the most incredible colour rendition I’ve ever used. Thank you so much for watching and commenting, I really appreciate you taking the time. Best wishes 👏📷😊
@@rileyphotos yes you are 100% correct. That EVF is a big drain on the batteries. Setting up the EVF to only turn on when your eye is up the the eyepiece can help. Of course DSLRs are always going to be superior with battery life. The technology is definitely getting much better though. Older EVFs had a slower refresh rate which would be harder to track. I believe the Nikon EVFs refresh 60 times a second, where my current Fuji X-T4 refreshes 100 times a second which is nice to look through and track subjects. I’m sure it’s a drain, but that camera also has upgraded batteries, so that’s good. At the end of the day, it’s all about the shooters preference. You like like the way Nikon images look out of camera (which I definitely do too) and it fits your needs. That’s all that matters. Specs, Megapixels, and camera age don’t really mean much. Your D810 is technically an older model, yet I know from experience when my wife owned a D810 how amazing that camera is. Great video and thanks for the reply.
This is an interesting comparison but I believe your friend does have a bit of an advantage as his kit is newer and most likely has more updated optics and tech. I don't want to take anything away from your friend and his kit, but your lens and camera is most likely 5 years older techwise than his gear. Additionally, as you saw in one of your recent videos comparing your son's newer iPhone to your older one, the newer technology does make a difference. Thank you for this video.
Hi Michael, great to hear from you. I do love to do comparisons like this, because on face value, I would expect the new highly rated newer Fuji to walk all over the Old man Nikon here, but truth was, it didn’t. It was lighter and had more contrast and colour but the Nikon gave as good as it got. There are not so many places in life that old tech can compete with new tech. I did consider editing some images at the end of the video and not saying if it was taken with a Fuji or Nikon lens, to see how easy it would be to spot the difference. I guess I’m testing the laws of diminishing returns. Maybe next time. Thanks for watching and commenting , much appreciated 👏📷😊
Thank you Michael, and if I may say so, I think it’s only a photographer with a wealth of experience them self, who is able to empathise and understanding the rapport one builds with a camera body to know it’s strengths and how hard to push. Thank you for such lovely comments 🙏🏻📷😊
@@rileyphotos Well, l were out shooting portraits with a Nikkor ai-s 135mm f2.8 some days ago. I’d never shot sharper photos. It made me rethink the use of autofocus. From now on l will controll my focus by checking it manually before l shoot. Atleast with regards to objects that does’nt move too much
Into the End, it's all about the weight. For instance, i prefer to carry a (way) small 80-200/4.5-5.6D vs a 80-200/2.8 ED, why? It's good enough for most tasks, it's way light, even on the F90x, F100. The other one is a beer can, and monster, good luck, on a photowalk half day, i do have back issues, couldn't carry this all time.
Hey great to hear from you, and I totally agree about weight. I’ve been a full time pro photographer since 1984, and back then, boy did we know about heavy cameras. When you went to photograph a football game with an FM2, with a motor drive attachment, and a 300 2.8, you needed scaffolding to help you hold it. I was fit a supple in those days, but a Billingham bag with two bodies, two drives, and primes like the 180 2.8, and 105 1.8, not to mention a Metz 45ct1 flash and shoulder mounted battery pack. By heck, the camera mounting bracket on that was heavier than my Zfc! I can tell you that by 25, I was suffering from ‘posties shoulder’ and it’s never really gone away. These days, I love my z 24-200mm 4-6.3. It’s as light as a feather. Sure I have to up the iso for longer zooms sometimes, but the weight trade off is worth it, and it never comes off the Z6ii body, so never have to deal with dust on the sensor. Thanks for watching and commenting, I really appreciate it 👍🏻
@@rileyphotos Hey Riley, i've (sadly) sold my FM2 into 2015. 😞 I only have via Nikon 35mm AF SLRs, no manual, since my fave SLRs are from two different brands. But AF, i love to shoot Nikon, way more than Canon...i was never been a fan of the so-called "Thumbwheel", and prefer two ordinary dials instead. 🙂 As for especially "bad weather" SLR, i use a cheap Nikon SLR, which survived fog and snowfall with flying colors. I always took care about the time to acclimatize the camera, and wiped off the snow from the body and lens, there was no fogging inside the cheap zoom, i am always using a quality protection filter. Yes, back then the gear was way heavy, just think F4 or F5 with the 80-200/2.8 ED....it's a tank. Really appreciate your comment - i wish a fine weekend, riley !
I own a Fuji X-H1 and must say the Nikon 80-200 F2.8 displays truer RED color than the Fuji. I can never get my Fuji lenses to display RED. They always seem to come out a bit orange. I own the Fuji 80-200 F2.8 and use it as my main walk about lens.
Agreed. My ultimate combo for natural colors is my 80-200 attached to my D700. I also have the D850 and D810 but there’s just something about the D700 (and it’s bigger brother D3) that I have a hard time replicating on other DSLRs.
...exactly what are you comparing here? Different lenses on different cameras-and to make things even more complicated, you have varying saturation, contrast, and exposure settings, which muddle the well-deserved reputations of Nikon and Fuji color science. While I truly admire the timeless Fuji 'look,' in this case, the subtle elegance of Nikon's renderings (in my humble-not-opinion) clearly outshines it...
Exactly, two lenses on two different cameras to see the difference, just what I had in the bag, never hid that fact. If you like scientific reviews that number crunch the lenses with fixed controls, then sadly I’m not the right channel, but there are loads of channels doing that, I hope you find one you enjoy. Thanks for giving mine a try, much appreciated 👍🏻
Whileas the physical aperture is the same (hereby: F2.8) the DoF isn't. To be fair, F2.8 via APS-C (Fujifilm) would be like F4 onto the 35mm D810, so in order to have a 1:1 comparable DoF, you must stop down the Nikon 80-200/2.8 to F4, for equal DoF to the Fujifilm. It's apples vs oranges, riley.
Hey that’s a great technical point. I’m not ultra techie on the channel, just a how it feels and what the pictures look like kind of photographer, but you’re right to point out that on APS the 2.8 isn’t exactly the same! Cheers
@@rileyphotos Yes, indeed. Thanks for your kind reply riley, appreciated. :) I do wish a fine weekend. PS: Still have lots of fun with my old F100, 28-105D or 28-70 AF-D (i do also own the F2.8 ED, but that's a monster, too huge, too heavy to carry. For landsape, architecture and such, i usually stop down by F8-F13, so F2.8 isn't being needed.
This is is ridiculous. You're not really comparing the lenses, You're mostly comparing the color rendition of the cameras, and the 24mp sensor of the Fuji vs. the 36mp sensor of the Nikon. These are both very sharp lenses.
OUCH 🤕 I’m sorry if my review has offended you. I’m just a pro photographer and over a 40 year career I’ve always been interested in using other snappers kit and seeing what the image looked like compared to mine. That’s all I do, just out of interest. I don’t do number crunching test card scientific reviews, there are plenty of them on RUclips but mine are just friendly opinions of what I think one looks like compared to the other. But hey, I appreciate that’s not for everyone and realise that my content isn’t for you, but I thank you kindly for taking a second to giving my channel a watch, I appreciate that. Best wishes 📷
I apologize for being excessively cranky, but I stand by my point that there are way too many uncontrolled variables for this comparison to be other than anecdotal.
Anecdotal rather than scientific, yes I’ll take that. And I apologise if my opinion masqueraded as fact. Once again thank you for watching and for taking the time to comment, I really do appreciate it 👏
I went down this same pathway Nikon user of a 70-200 lens on a D5, D7 D1 D700 a few primes, Semi Professional Sports Photographer, Main interest Winter Olympics and scored assignments in Winter sports OS in NZ and Aussie.. Funny an Aussie who loves being in the snow. Then along came my Fujifilm XT2 Xt3 Xt4 HS1 and a line up of primes and wide angle, the dilemma a Sports Lens fast enough with auto focus lenses multi Zone and capture speed processors for extreme weather conditions and very fast moving subjects. When your shooting with f2 f 4 fixed 400 600 800 mm Nikon lens with 105mm glass, you really are worried about using your Fujifilm camera systems when the big boys come out to play. But I love my Fujifilm Cameras and lens, that tac tile feel that look and not forgetting it's APC and the images if taken in JPEG only impressed the Sports editors on my last assignment. Thanks Mate enjoying your channel.
Atleast in my eyes l tought the fuji lense were great. Some pictures looked a bit fresher than the nikon lense. Thats only my opinion though. I wanted to watch this because l ordered a Nikon AF 80-200mm f2.8D myself a week ago.
Stabilisé ; non stabilisé... à mentionner... ! - Par ailleurs les exemples de photos, svp, les juxtaposer (voiture rouge / type E)... Il aurait été intéressant de placer le 80-200 Nikon sur le Fuji, via un adaptateur...
Haha, quite right Alex, I’m afraid I’m not very good at true comparison. I just kind of pick the lenses I have in my bag, all good fun though. Thanks for watching 👍🏻
Very nice comparison! I use both Fuji and Nikon and I pretty much feel just like you- I prefere the more subtle colours and contrast of the Nikon + the ability to get thinner depth of field. It´s actually quite funny- I´ve been using Fujifilm professionally for some three years but I still couldn´t say I love the colours :) When I look at a Nikon file it always looks much more natural to me. But I love the Fujifilm system as a whole and that´s why I still use it. However, I went to Nikon for wildlife- Fuji just don´t have the lenses, yet. (and I had the 100-400mm...)
I couldn’t agree more Petr, colour management is something that tends to get left behind on the gear debate. Functions are always talked about, but what the delivered image looks like is pretty important. Maybe it’s because it’s easily corrected in post, or even that you can set the camera up to correct it to your colour taste. That’s where being a pro v amateur is different. Correcting one or two images from a shoot is one thing, but if I’ve been shooting all day for a brochure then hand correcting 400 images is not high on my to do list 🤣 and that I suppose, is why I shoot Nikon. Thanks for watching and commenting, I really appreciate it 👏😊
the weight between my d700 with that lense and my oly em1 with a modern tele zoom is insane for my spine :D. but the images i get with the nikon setup is just da bomb.
Use adapter and use Nikon on Fuji body and then compere it. More useful cooperation.
One of my favourite places.
We had a great time there, thanks for watching Philip 👍🏻📷😊
I have both. I have also used the Nikkor adapted to fuji XT series cameras and the Xpro2 giving a luscious and fast 120-300mm range.
I prefer the nikkor because I think it renders tones better for Black and white and I can use it with my 35mm SLR Film cameras. I also prefer the full frame depth of field you get at 200mm compared with 140mm on a crop. It edges it on sharpness, colour and micro contrast. However the colour differences are much more subtle when using the lenses on the same camera. But I still really like the fuji, it feels significantly lighter, it has optical stabilisation which is nice in low light, particularly for me since none of my cameras have IBIS. The autofocus is quiet and snappy, and works on my fuji cameras, whereas the autofocus for the nikkor is good, it only works with my D4, and that's quite a big camera to lug around all day with a big hefty lens.
Both have their use.
Also regarding the DOF, the shallower depth of field from the nikkor has nothing to do with the sensor size. It's because F2.8 at 200mm gives a shallower DOF than 140mm at F2.8. If you put the Nikkor on the Fuji you get the exact same DOF on the x-trans crop as it does on a Full Frame, however it's cropped out of the centre so the focal range appears longer.
It's very easy to test, just switch your fx camera to crop mode, the DOF doesn't change, just the field of view.
I only use nikon on my fuji X-H1, I just love manual focus nikon.
Same here! I also did that just to save money but I have been thinking about getting the Fuji 50-140 for some time now
Totally agree!
Interesting video. I went from shooting a Nikon D500 to a Fuji X-T4. For me, it was an upgrade. Though the D500 is still by far the best APS-C DSLR ever made. I do understand the mirror box click you mentioned is definitely true, though you do get used to the feel as your friend said and there is movement when you take a shot, just not as much. The advantage of the IBIS is also much more noticeable when you shoot.
At the end of the day, I can see why you would stick with Nikon. The colors out of camera from Nikon is amazing and underrated. If I decided to stick with Nikon, I probably would have went with the newer Z7ii, because the IBIS is definitely worth it. Batteries are getting better with Mirrorless cameras, so that’s definitely starting to go out the door. Your friends Fuji has the older batteries, so I’m not surprised he drained a battery so quickly. X-T4 has the newer batteries that last quite a long time.
Hi Daniel, thank you for your comments they are most welcome and it’s great to get some detailed views from a photographer with personal experience of both brands. The batteries will be better on the newer Fuji, that’s a great point. I still found that when shooting with the Nikon Z6ii (review on my channel) the mirrorless batteries were nowhere near as long lasting, I guess it’s the EVF, but technology will soon catch up, and the batteries will soon be much better. I agree about the Nikon colour rendition, it seems to often be overlooked. The older D3s (also a review on my channel) had the most incredible colour rendition I’ve ever used. Thank you so much for watching and commenting, I really appreciate you taking the time. Best wishes 👏📷😊
@@rileyphotos yes you are 100% correct. That EVF is a big drain on the batteries. Setting up the EVF to only turn on when your eye is up the the eyepiece can help. Of course DSLRs are always going to be superior with battery life. The technology is definitely getting much better though. Older EVFs had a slower refresh rate which would be harder to track. I believe the Nikon EVFs refresh 60 times a second, where my current Fuji X-T4 refreshes 100 times a second which is nice to look through and track subjects. I’m sure it’s a drain, but that camera also has upgraded batteries, so that’s good.
At the end of the day, it’s all about the shooters preference. You like like the way Nikon images look out of camera (which I definitely do too) and it fits your needs. That’s all that matters. Specs, Megapixels, and camera age don’t really mean much. Your D810 is technically an older model, yet I know from experience when my wife owned a D810 how amazing that camera is.
Great video and thanks for the reply.
This is an interesting comparison but I believe your friend does have a bit of an advantage as his kit is newer and most likely has more updated optics and tech.
I don't want to take anything away from your friend and his kit, but your lens and camera is most likely 5 years older techwise than his gear.
Additionally, as you saw in one of your recent videos comparing your son's newer iPhone to your older one, the newer technology does make a difference.
Thank you for this video.
Hi Michael, great to hear from you. I do love to do comparisons like this, because on face value, I would expect the new highly rated newer Fuji to walk all over the Old man Nikon here, but truth was, it didn’t. It was lighter and had more contrast and colour but the Nikon gave as good as it got. There are not so many places in life that old tech can compete with new tech. I did consider editing some images at the end of the video and not saying if it was taken with a Fuji or Nikon lens, to see how easy it would be to spot the difference. I guess I’m testing the laws of diminishing returns. Maybe next time. Thanks for watching and commenting , much appreciated 👏📷😊
@@rileyphotos I would have to say that your deep experience shooting and understanding your camera's attributes were most definitely in your favor.
Thank you Michael, and if I may say so, I think it’s only a photographer with a wealth of experience them self, who is able to empathise and understanding the rapport one builds with a camera body to know it’s strengths and how hard to push. Thank you for such lovely comments 🙏🏻📷😊
@@rileyphotos
Well,
l were out shooting portraits with a Nikkor ai-s 135mm f2.8 some days ago. I’d never shot sharper photos.
It made me rethink the use of autofocus. From now on l will controll my focus by checking it manually before l shoot. Atleast with regards to objects that does’nt move too much
Into the End, it's all about the weight. For instance, i prefer to carry a (way) small 80-200/4.5-5.6D vs a 80-200/2.8 ED, why? It's good enough for most tasks, it's way light, even on the F90x, F100. The other one is a beer can, and monster, good luck, on a photowalk half day, i do have back issues, couldn't carry this all time.
Hey great to hear from you, and I totally agree about weight. I’ve been a full time pro photographer since 1984, and back then, boy did we know about heavy cameras. When you went to photograph a football game with an FM2, with a motor drive attachment, and a 300 2.8, you needed scaffolding to help you hold it. I was fit a supple in those days, but a Billingham bag with two bodies, two drives, and primes like the 180 2.8, and 105 1.8, not to mention a Metz 45ct1 flash and shoulder mounted battery pack. By heck, the camera mounting bracket on that was heavier than my Zfc! I can tell you that by 25, I was suffering from ‘posties shoulder’ and it’s never really gone away. These days, I love my z 24-200mm 4-6.3. It’s as light as a feather. Sure I have to up the iso for longer zooms sometimes, but the weight trade off is worth it, and it never comes off the Z6ii body, so never have to deal with dust on the sensor. Thanks for watching and commenting, I really appreciate it 👍🏻
@@rileyphotos Hey Riley, i've (sadly) sold my FM2 into 2015. 😞 I only have via Nikon 35mm AF SLRs, no manual, since my fave SLRs are from two different brands. But AF, i love to shoot Nikon, way more than Canon...i was never been a fan of the so-called "Thumbwheel", and prefer two ordinary dials instead. 🙂 As for especially "bad weather" SLR, i use a cheap Nikon SLR, which survived fog and snowfall with flying colors. I always took care about the time to acclimatize the camera, and wiped off the snow from the body and lens, there was no fogging inside the cheap zoom, i am always using a quality protection filter. Yes, back then the gear was way heavy, just think F4 or F5 with the 80-200/2.8 ED....it's a tank. Really appreciate your comment - i wish a fine weekend, riley !
Af-s Nikkor 80-200 2,8 D isn't so good as 70-200 Vr II
I tested both , I stl poses both.
I own a Fuji X-H1 and must say the Nikon 80-200 F2.8 displays truer RED color than the Fuji. I can never get my Fuji lenses to display RED. They always seem to come out a bit orange. I own the Fuji 80-200 F2.8 and use it as my main walk about lens.
Agreed. My ultimate combo for natural colors is my 80-200 attached to my D700. I also have the D850 and D810 but there’s just something about the D700 (and it’s bigger brother D3) that I have a hard time replicating on other DSLRs.
...exactly what are you comparing here? Different lenses on different cameras-and to make things even more complicated, you have varying saturation, contrast, and exposure settings, which muddle the well-deserved reputations of Nikon and Fuji color science. While I truly admire the timeless Fuji 'look,' in this case, the subtle elegance of Nikon's renderings (in my humble-not-opinion) clearly outshines it...
Exactly, two lenses on two different cameras to see the difference, just what I had in the bag, never hid that fact. If you like scientific reviews that number crunch the lenses with fixed controls, then sadly I’m not the right channel, but there are loads of channels doing that, I hope you find one you enjoy. Thanks for giving mine a try, much appreciated 👍🏻
@@rileyphotos O M G ! such a 'subtle elegance of Nikon's renderings' like response... haha, much appreciated 4 not being insulted!"
Whileas the physical aperture is the same (hereby: F2.8) the DoF isn't. To be fair, F2.8 via APS-C (Fujifilm) would be like F4 onto the 35mm D810, so in order to have a 1:1 comparable DoF, you must stop down the Nikon 80-200/2.8 to F4, for equal DoF to the Fujifilm. It's apples vs oranges, riley.
Hey that’s a great technical point. I’m not ultra techie on the channel, just a how it feels and what the pictures look like kind of photographer, but you’re right to point out that on APS the 2.8 isn’t exactly the same! Cheers
@@rileyphotos Yes, indeed. Thanks for your kind reply riley, appreciated. :) I do wish a fine weekend.
PS: Still have lots of fun with my old F100, 28-105D or 28-70 AF-D (i do also own the F2.8 ED, but that's a monster, too huge, too heavy to carry. For landsape, architecture and such, i usually stop down by F8-F13, so F2.8 isn't being needed.
2 men comparing their lengths in car park ;) Typical day in the UK XD ahaha
The Nikon is a car photography lens .. creates amazing light stars on chrome
That I didn’t know, I need to try this out, thanks 👍🏻
This is is ridiculous. You're not really comparing the lenses, You're mostly comparing the color rendition of the cameras, and the 24mp sensor of the Fuji vs. the 36mp sensor of the Nikon. These are both very sharp lenses.
OUCH 🤕 I’m sorry if my review has offended you. I’m just a pro photographer and over a 40 year career I’ve always been interested in using other snappers kit and seeing what the image looked like compared to mine. That’s all I do, just out of interest. I don’t do number crunching test card scientific reviews, there are plenty of them on RUclips but mine are just friendly opinions of what I think one looks like compared to the other. But hey, I appreciate that’s not for everyone and realise that my content isn’t for you, but I thank you kindly for taking a second to giving my channel a watch, I appreciate that. Best wishes 📷
I apologize for being excessively cranky, but I stand by my point that there are way too many uncontrolled variables for this comparison to be other than anecdotal.
Anecdotal rather than scientific, yes I’ll take that. And I apologise if my opinion masqueraded as fact. Once again thank you for watching and for taking the time to comment, I really do appreciate it 👏
Fuji definitely looks better to me overall and I own nikon and Fuji
I went down this same pathway Nikon user of a 70-200 lens on a D5, D7 D1 D700 a few primes, Semi Professional Sports Photographer, Main interest Winter Olympics and scored assignments in Winter sports OS in NZ and Aussie.. Funny an Aussie who loves being in the snow. Then along came my Fujifilm XT2 Xt3 Xt4 HS1 and a line up of primes and wide angle, the dilemma a Sports Lens fast enough with auto focus lenses multi Zone and capture speed processors for extreme weather conditions and very fast moving subjects. When your shooting with f2 f 4 fixed 400 600 800 mm Nikon lens with 105mm glass, you really are worried about using your Fujifilm camera systems when the big boys come out to play. But I love my Fujifilm Cameras and lens, that tac tile feel that look and not forgetting it's APC and the images if taken in JPEG only impressed the Sports editors on my last assignment. Thanks Mate enjoying your channel.
Atleast in my eyes l tought the fuji lense were great. Some pictures looked a bit fresher than the nikon lense.
Thats only my opinion though. I wanted to watch this because l ordered a Nikon AF 80-200mm f2.8D myself a week ago.
Yeah, mee too! I just ordered a refurbished 80-200mm but I think Fuji takes the cake here
It's like putting a potato up against a tomato
Haha, so that’s why my pizza’s don’t taste very nice 🤣 thanks for watching Billy, much appreciated 👍🏻📷😊
Stabilisé ; non stabilisé... à mentionner... ! - Par ailleurs les exemples de photos, svp, les juxtaposer (voiture rouge / type E)... Il aurait été intéressant de placer le 80-200 Nikon sur le Fuji, via un adaptateur...
The Nikon does a better job, you can see it instantly. The Nikon out guns the Fuji.
Go Nikon 💪🏻📷
Agreed. I have about 30 Nikon lenses and the 80-200 is my sharpest along with Nikon 300mm 2.8.
slightly wider but not as long... so not really a true comparison
Haha, quite right Alex, I’m afraid I’m not very good at true comparison. I just kind of pick the lenses I have in my bag, all good fun though. Thanks for watching 👍🏻