You can try with any other points. The end diagram is the same. Note that the inner points are equivalent and outer points are also equivalent. So just check by removing any one of the outer points.
The combination of a bit of luck and looking at what degree points are. Usually, you wanna keep 5 or 6 points with deg=3 or 4. In Peterson, they are all 3 so you choose at random
The initial vertex you remove on the inner star is of degree 3 is it not? I'm a little confused as to why you were able to do that, when you said previously the vertices had to be of degree 2.
It's nice to see someone taking time to discuss Kurtowski. It is usually just
mentioned in passing.
when you first drew the peterson subgraph, how did you know which edges to remove intially?
You can try with any other points. The end diagram is the same. Note that the inner points are equivalent and outer points are also equivalent. So just check by removing any one of the outer points.
You clarified in under eleven minutes what canonical texts have universally obscured.
great video! it's perfect to finish my day!
shut up
Found this video helpful. Thank you
Thank you so much. I was having trouble with this concept really well explained.
How did he decide which vertices to delete from the Petersen to create K3,3?
great vid btw
That's the tricky part.
The combination of a bit of luck and looking at what degree points are. Usually, you wanna keep 5 or 6 points with deg=3 or 4. In Peterson, they are all 3 so you choose at random
You can delete any actually. Then you gotta arrange it in the way to convert it into k5
Brilliant! Thanks for explaining Kuratowski's Theorem.
awesome videos, i finally understand kuratowski ;) thx man
thank you for making the concepts so simple and fun !! 😀
writing backwards always amazes me great vid
That was extremely helpful, thank you !
thanks bro I hope you get more views
thanks this video is not only and makes this concept lucid ...
Bombastic Video + Explanation
Very good video thanks ❤
Thank you for explaining, Great video.
good job.clearly explained.
Wow that board is so cool :)
Good explanation, thank you !
Sir plz called the planner graph and non planner graph alpha index and gamma index calculation formula of transport network connectivity ??
Great explanation ❤
The initial vertex you remove on the inner star is of degree 3 is it not? I'm a little confused as to why you were able to do that, when you said previously the vertices had to be of degree 2.
You are great.
Does every non-planar graph contain both forbidden Ks, or is Petersen idiosyncratic?
ek number bhai
Great video!!!
are you witting backward or the camera is just inverted
of course he is writing backwards
What a wonderful lesson!!
very clear explanation. thank you.
awesome sauce
i recommend playing this at 1.5x
Thank you!! This helps me a lot!!
Thank u so much sir!
Great explanation
Amazing video. Thank you :)
thank you very much for this video
thanks!!!
Nice video. Thank you!!
why cant we simplify k33 even more?
Thank you so much !!!!
Good explanation
Perfect
Verygood
have my discrete math class exam tomorrow and i know am fucked if i get a question like this
howd it go?
10:40
👍
good job.clearly explained.
Great Video!!!