@@KlNG____340see listen angrez ke pille mein vigyan aur Dharm pe vishwas rakhta hu par tum log vohi jo internet pe particularly ek Dharam ko target karte ho fir moot nikal jati ha samne ane pe why you people having that much hatred
To be honest, I see this as a bit of a failure from the scientific community. Science has become centered around these conversations by celebrity scientists or rich capitalists like Elon Musk etc. I have an engineering degree from an IIT and a master's from IISc and I can't wrap my head around a lot of these ideas. Most people in our country do not need knowledge of particle physics, let alone unproven ideas like string theory or multiverse theory. But pop-science is full of this. Religiopolitical groups can very easily exploit the vagueness around the terms in these areas and benefit from gullibility of masses. A lot of my colleagues and co-workers struggle with simple ideas like scientific method, logic, epistemology, falsifiability, design of experiments, statistical significance etc. These are the things which are of way more significance to the common man. Even if they do not provide employment directly, these things can help people develop a rational outlook and at the very least save their hard-earned money from scamsters.
The fear of disillusionment is compelling these propaganda machinery to devise a novel correlation between science and mythology and surprisingly in the crux of this propagation, they are saying that past civilisation was even more advanced and should be brought back to the current era. Ultimately, making a conservative back steps to the pasts which never existed the way it is visualised now.
People who say that everything is already present in the Vedas are very stupid.The basic concept of the Hindu santan dhrama is to seek.It says that we cannot simply believe anything just because someone said or because it is written somewhere.It even tells us to not blindly believe something "god"says.Its just the idea of seeking to seek and learn not to believe.Here,both the dharm and and science are in danger.People use any pseudoscience to correlate it to science and prove themselves correct I don't know why I wrote all of this.Maybe because I am too fed up with people saying things like "aum=mc^2"
Religion and science should never be mixed. Im a religious person but that is something about my personal feelings and beliefs something that feels like a place of peace and hope to keep living. But just making all that nonsense claims ki hame to sb pata hai? As a student of physics Its so frustrating to look at people just taking the years of efforts and work a scientist is putting in coming up with great ideas and theories so lightly and stating ki hmare yaha to we knew this already. And as a hindu its embarassing as well Dharma is something which should be there to keep you going on the right track . Om = mc^2??? 😂😂 Its so funny to think ki koi itna creative soch raha hai And with such confidence I might read a 100 books over a topic and still not gef this amount of confidence on speaking something about it
Choti - you are too young to understand about Vedas, Vedanta and Upanishads. All I can say right now study hard and understand the basic concepts once you are free take out time to study basic of Quantum Physic and then read Vedanta to begin with...then you will understand. Santhan Dharam has three major approaching angles.(no one ever will tell you this - people make million of dollars out of this) 1. From religious point of view - when and where people do rituals and pray goddess and gods (mainly temples and astrology, kundali (horoscope), remedies, mantras jaap etc) 2. As a way of life - following traditions and culture ( pitr sharadha, yoga, meditation, focusing on inner self that what you are describing " development of philosophies" not marrying in same gotra (due to blood fusion) preserving mother earth by using natural produce for eg...cow's milk, urine, cow dung, by planting trees, being kind to animals, birds etc) 3. From quantum physic point of view - This is where things get spiced up 👻👻....here the gods & goddess are NOT gods & goddess as we are told or know - but taken as huge force fields spread across space - that's why we also know - brahma as the creator, vishnu - as the preserver and shiva - as the destroyer. besides like devi kali compared to black hole as symbolism of tongue that she licked blood of "rakth beez" where ever it feel - thus black hole - absorbs everything even light...see the "reference" this is just in a nutshell I am explaining. Problem is that Indians who are good in Vedic knowledge (Sanskirt) they are poor in Quantum Physic (English) and vice versa..that's why when vedic acharya try to explain they are unable to explain from "science" point of view and when quantum physicists try to explain they are unable to pin point the Vedic reference... so people think its "cherry picking" and they often laugh calling it pseudo science.
@@AlienBabUfo Okay if Vedas are so good than tell me what your Acharyas who specifically are good in Vedic knowledge have achieved using them? tell me something that currently exists not just in textbook that was created by using vedas. you'll won't find anything because current Vedic knowledge is just philosophy with morals and ethics. there is nothing you can do scientific with it. our "scientific knowledge" which was "true" vadas were burned during mugal raj. and what made me so pissed about your comment is that it doesn't make any sense bro. just. stop. spreading. garbage. you are harming Hinduism by doing that. Om=MC^2 literally doesn't mean anything. your logic is like because i can move and an aeroplane can also move therefore, I'm an aeroplane guys i am AEROPLANE. claiming such idiotic things make our community look illiterate to outsiders/newcomers and that's exactly what you are doing. oh yeah btw i'm Science major currently studying Quantum mechanics.
@@KyuNhiHoRahiPadhai-i2h""major currently studying Quantum mechanics." ok - "consciousness creates energy and energy creates mass" can you give me an equation for this ?? don't worry wrong or right or what ever you may think or comes in your mind....i am NOT going to judge you but its your lucky day maybe you get some magic stuff to hear and think......to help > take Consciousness = {e0 =1} as per H Hu and M Wu. 😉
Poor Nasa, the US government didn't fund them enough as they do for the military so Nasa couldn't buy a 15 k ₹ Vedic physics book from Amazon so they call our great great great..... [2000 years later] great Acharya Agnivrat, but our Acharya ji is patriotic so he rejected their offer. Now he will collaborate with ISRO and our nation will be going to develop an anti gravity vehicle soon 🤯🧠.
E in E=MC² stands for Energy Now if you denote any letter with energy it will not change the equation If you denote 🕉 with energy and not God or anything else It will not change the equation
Hey Kshitij I don't have words to describe your efforts, your courage, your calmness to address these utter pseudo science claims by these RUclipsrs. I always wanted to make these kind of videos to debunk these clowns but since I didn't able to study Physics and further higher studies, becoz I entered in corporate world to support my family. Becoz to debunk these kind of sophistication pseudo science you need to have good understanding of the subject. Again I appreciate your wittines to address the issue without any gali galauj. Thank you.
It’s essential to address misinformation or misunderstandings with facts and respectful dialogue. While everyone is entitled to their opinions in the comment section, it’s important that we engage in conversations about science, religion, or culture with respect and sensitivity toward others. In the case of debunking a scientific claim like E = mc², it’s best to focus on the facts and provide logical reasoning. Attacking or making inappropriate comments about someone's religion or beliefs only distracts from the core discussion and contributes to negativity. Let’s keep the conversation constructive and focused on understanding each other better.
you aren’t dumb for that. They are indeed relative. To keep it simple, in relativity there is one more concept called relativistic mass which increases with speed. And E = MC2 is just a simplified equation for rest condition.
@@haneechaitanya3832 right, but how do I define rest. Is it in rest for me or is it universally in rest(which seems illogical) so how do we define that rest that is what I would like to know, thanks for the reply tho.
Mujhe pahli bar tumhara channel meri feed mein dikha, yaar Kitna achcha video banate Ho. Aur tujhe Maine subscribe bhi Kiya kyunki tera Gyan bahut kam ka hai. Thank You ! Bahut accha video banaya.
Actually you can put anything on left side of equation as long as you claim that it is having dimension of energy, replacing E by Om or any other symbol that represents the content of energy. Key idea is it must be some form of equivalence of energy. For example, let's say a mass defect gets converted to energy in a nuclear reaction which is equivalent to 20,000 TNTs then same equation can be written in terms of TNTs. Argument of relative motion also doesn't hold good, because frame of reference is arbitrary. This video is good explanation of E=mc2 but that's it.
@@Yash-972 I'm saying not just OM, you can replace it with anything having the same dimension and unit equivalence, that's how E has been put, it is supposed to show the total energy of the system, which itself needs the definition of being equivalent to something.
@@ChiragTripathi01 Mr. Chirag, as much as I know, every mathematically correct equation is dimensionally correct. But the reverse case is not true. You are claiming that anything which has same dimension as energy can be put in the equation in the place of energy. This will only ensure the dimensional correctness of the equation. Numerically the equation may be false.
@VinitChaubey448 True, it may be false but then it is not the problem of representation but the choice of units. Units can always be chosen in such a way so that this equation can be written in the required form. That's what we are doing with E also, in physics we really don't understand energy, it is always taken as equivalent to something such as in calories equivalent or Joules equivalent. Now Om is taken as one of the fundamental vibration and depending on how we define the equivalence E can be represented in terms of Oms as well and of course by any other form of energy. It may sound ridiculous but that's the way it is, Kshitij's point is to be precise in terms of energy but what I want to convey is neither we understand energy nor we understand Om intuitively but a form of similar expression can always be achieved by any array of representation.
Are bhai vedanta hai brambha satya Jagat mithha,bramhha matalab atma paramatma super power koi uper mein ,aur jaggat matlab body ishko ye log jabardasti non duality ka name deke prove karn cha ta hai jab ki param atma ka koi prove nahi hai ,jake shankar digvijay ka book paro samjh jao ge ye log 21 century ke hisab se ishko fixed karne ke liye ishka matlab change kar diya 😂
21:49 bro wth are you doing then , no one just going around and saying om mc2 , you are comparing to china ??? Our Indian scientists are working hard tooo , they are not stuck to religious thing .... Science is developing well in india .
Yes ,it is !!! But it's limited to only a small proportion of our population.....most of the people here in our country aren't even familiar with science!!
@@For_watching_yt I'm not judging...I'm just stating facts ,what's true is true .....I hope you're well aware of the education system in our country and know the literacy rate of our people here
@@12zs literacy rate is judged on the criteria if a person can write something in any language. Now what is your criteria? Like are you considering pHD or something as a criteria
Pandit Nehru's idea of the scientific temper is more relevant than ever. It doesn't neglect spirituality, but it does reject blind faith and superstitions.
To all the haters he might not be the right person to educate about hindu scriptures but hindu do try to find cause and reason behind every occurance Name a feild that Hindus hasnt wrote a book about From biology to universe to kinematics to history to economics to trigonometry to architecture to music to RITUALS GHOST everything Many were right many are proven wrong but at least they tried to do something better for the world than THE "KEYWORD WARRIORS" HERE
@@MainHarshit Nope that's not true. most of our scientific knowledge was burned in mugal raj. what is left is just philosophy and moral ethics. average hindu doesn't even have fraction of current science knowledge because if this is science than wtf am i doing at school? our current science have root with vedic time but that's it. after that most of the science has been reformed by west countries. also @NishanT_ACM there is nothing in quantum field theory that was wrote by ancient india.
@@Nishkarsh-gc5yr Nope my friend. India was wealthiest and had most "scientific knowledge" in acient times more than greece, rome and Persians. but it can't be said same today because mugals burned the university that had our most of the knowledge and left us with nothing.
@abu-karz nope i am physicsist . The prof some books wrote they just try to reach the E=mc^2. Even in Einstein reached papers he directly wrote the formula is even Einstein didn't prove then its prove doesn't exist.
These spokespersons and self-proclaimed preacher want the entire great things, knowledge, formulae, individuals to align with Hinduism to portray themselves great 😂😂😂
The most funny fact is that the pseudo scientists who don't understand science, also don't understand om. Saying Om = mc² is not only disrespectful to science but also shameful to spirituality. As far as I know Vedic literature deals with liberation of self, not modern science.
Om is not any energy, it represents non-duality. The world is not just made up of energy, it also has matter so energy alone can't represent non-duality. Om = 0*∞ This is the correct equation of non-duality.
Bhai 😂Bramhha satya Jagat mithha ye hai asli vedanta ishko ye log jabardasti cher char karke ye sab banya believe nahi hota Shankar digvijay ke book paro ,ye log slokh ke sath cher char kar raha hai ,aur ishi karan se madhavacharya ne troll kiya tha aur bola tha brambha jo hota o aur ham same nahi hai ushka atma aur Hamara atmma alakh hai ,but Shankracharya ne bola tha pramatma ka ham ak ansh hai
ॐ = 0*∞ "Vedanta teaches that consciousness is singular, all happenings are played out in one universal consciousness and there is no multiplicity of selves." ― Erwin Schrodinger "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of Quantum Physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly made much more sense." ― Werner Heisenberg "I go into the Upanishads to ask questions." ― Niels Bohr "The Vedanta and the Sankhya hold the key to the laws of mind and thought process which are co-related to the Quantum Field, i.e. the operation and distribution of particles at atomic and molecular levels" ― Brian David Josephson, Nobel loureate, Welsh Physicist "What we shall find in Modern Physics is an exemplification, an encouragement and a refinement of old Hindu wisdom" ― J. Robert Oppenheimer, Theoretical Physicist "Whenever I give a lecture on quantum physics, I feel as if I am talking on Vedanta" ― Prof. Dr. Hans-Peter Dürr (1929-2014) Nuclear Physicist
At first ishka historical sitting bhi dekh lo Sunyabada ka copy bola jata hai Advaita vedanta ko and Adi Shankaracharya jishne ish advait vedanta ko adopt kiya tab budhism ushne bhi bola tha Sunyabada is right, madhavacharya Sunyabada and advait vedanta ko troll kiya tha ab bolo 😂@Rikky-the-Unstoppable
@studywithme-dh8iu koi murkh insaan hi Advait ko Sunyavad bolega. Sunyavad me Atma ko nahi maante par Advait me Atma hi sab kuch hai Atma hi Brahm hai. Dono philosophies me zameen aasman ka antar hai. Madhvacharya to Dvaitvadi hai wo to Advait ke khilaf bolenge hi par unhone Sunyavad ko bhi troll kiya ab ye nahi bataoge 😂
@@astrokshitij keep uploading bro ☝🏻☝🏻 These antiquity pleaders Can't even interpret or make an antibiogram but still they claim, there is everything in Vedas 😌🤡
Dear sir, its just not that they don't know science, but unfortunately they don't know Upanishad and vedanta for sure. Om or akhashar brahma or ultimate truth of Self (as described in kath Upanishad, conversation between jam and nachiketa). Vedant direct one to understand the self and inner libaration from all internal conflicts of mind to reach Self. But unfortunately these semi literates also tranishing the things we should be proud of. They don't understand about adhyatma. So they wanted reflected glory by manufacturing such pathetic pseudo science. Very sad.
Are bhai thum sab sahi bol rha ho par ye samj nahi rahe ho ki om 🕉 hai na uska nam he hai energy aur thume ache se patha hai ki pura universe is made of energy and forms of energy yes or no? Thats why 🕉 is a pura universa ka all forms of energy. Therefore if you read upanishads from that we say that everything is om (energy) and the energy is god so god is everything and the energy is you because you also made up of energy thats why you are a energy (god) so you are god yourself. you(energy) were present everywhere. If i am wrong please reply and ask questions i hope you understand. E = mc² se mauje kuch be lena dena kuch nahi hai muje lina hai mass is a form of energy and energy is called 🕉 in Hinduism saying that everything is made by energy in upanishads Phele pado upanishads ko bad me Hinduism ke bare mae comment karna socho
@@UnknownKing-ov7eh as per kathopanishad om is representation of akshar Brahma or atma. Please difine Brahma. Sarve veda jat padamamanmati sarvani cha jadbadanti/ jadichchhanto brahmacharjaranti tatte padam snghrahena brabimyomitetat.(1/2/15) etaddhebakhsharang Brahma etaddhebakhsharang param/ etaddhebakhsharang galntya Jo jadichchhati tasya tat.(1/2/16) from kathopanishad.
@@AlienBabUfo really!! Ooo soo inciteful🙈🙉🙊🤭😆😆😁. For your kind information, before giving such rats' fart, there are several translation works of vedas, Upanishads, Gitas available please go and check out first. Indeed there are three ways in hindu/sanatan dharma, gyan marg, karma marg and vakti marg, and first one is mandatory to follow last two properly. And one must have the key of vedanta (the main piller of Hinduism) to properly understand and decipher the meaning of all smriti sahitya. If anything in smriti sahitya contradicts veda and contradicts vedanta then it's to be discarded. For example astrology has no vedanta so it must be discarded. Have you ever tried to understand Nirvanastakam by Adi Shankaracharya? If not please go through and try to understand. It's one of the classic example of neti neti and charaiveti charaiveti of vedanta. And for your kind information all those scriptures teach about atma gyan .. to observe the self ruthlessly and to be liberated from all the bond of desire.. Maya.. (vidya). It has it's own glory. Whereas science deals with all the outer thing (jagat, which includes leaving body also) that can be termed as avidya. Astabakra gita defines self as 'Nahm deho na me deho bodhohmiti nishchaya..' (11/6, 2/22).
Your explanations are simple and effective. Bhai you should start a new English channel to reach international audience. Creators like you, are really needed, not only in India but worldwide
2:13 it does not "happen to be" that exact constant more accurately it is not square of speed of light but square of speed of causality it isn't a mere coincidence that E=mc^2 it's because information travels at maximum speed of c, it's because this speed is same in all reference frames not because it is speed of light but because it is speed of causality. 2:18 again, it isn't that just because it fits in the units or dimension, so it works but because it works, it fits in the units. You could argue that E=mv^2 where v is velocity of object or that E=w(dI/dt) where w is angular velocity of object and dI/dt just represents rate of change in moment of inertia (I) because you can see that right- and left-hand side have same dimensions but obviously this is not true.
10:08 Yes, please! A video on how NEUTRINOs get their mass would be awesome! I’m all for pure science-way more interesting than watching pseudoscience get roasted. Can’t wait!
I’ll tell you story from jain philosophy .. if some group of people try to understand (reality ) elephant then everybody start to touch every part of the elephant some people touches the tail somebody touches the trunk and some touches his body and then they are telling that reality is like rope ,spare and wall respectively but no one ever find what is the reality it … So they representing there version and you are representing yours ❤ I hope people will understand what I want to tell Thankyou 😊
Jo log in theory banane walo ko gali de rhe h andhbhakt keh rahe hai unse galat koi ho nhi sakta, samajh mein sabko aata h lekin ese majak banana koi intellectual nahi karta, ironically on the topic of science these comments are made.
wo sirf scientifically wrong nahi hindu spiritual philosophically bhi wrong hai to Jo hindu philosophy khojta hai use bhi research karni chahiye sirf Science guys ko nahi "Aum = mc²" na sirf science ke principles ke khilaaf hai, balki spirituality ke essence ko bhi distort karta hai. Aum ek spiritual aur universal concept hai, jo material boundaries se pare hai. Use ek physical formula mein bound karna na sirf uski anantta ko seemit karta hai, balki uske spiritual arth ka hani bhi karta hai. Science aur spirituality alag fields hain, unhe mix karna dono ki asli beauty ko kharaab karta hai. BTW mei ek Atheist hoon lekin tab bhi hindu philosophy acchi lagti hai isliye thodi knowledge acchi baat hai....
Why brother why ??? AUM / OM is the "root mantra" do you even understand what does it mean ? 1. Laws of energy has proven again and again everything in this universe is a wave or vibrating energy. 2. Consciousness creates energy and energy creates mass 3. Billion dollar question - Who controls the oscillatory movement in an atom so precise that if that movement is even slightly uneven....we all know neutrons, protons, electrons will collapse with the nucleus of that atom. Who is controlling that "movement" who started that "movement" now you got the lead where OM / AUM comes from after all its the "root mantra" Vedas Vedanta and Upanishads have three approach angle. 1. Spiritual - Meditation, Mantra jaaps, Kundali jagran, etc 2. A Way of life - Rituals, Havan, Celebration, Festivals, Yoga etc 3. Quantum Physic - Theories of everything. First talk to some person dealing with Quantum Physic or Astro Physic before jumping into conclusion.
They say MC^2 represents non duality, and Om also represents non duality. So..... according to this analogy: LGBTQ+ represents non duality, and Om represents non duality. So according to their own logic, Om is same as LGBTQ+ I'm sure they'll love this! xDD
Actually I think some of them don't want to say om is eaual to mc square as formula but like an overview, that just like modern physics, hindu texts knew non duality too
@@dariyababumalapati7144 Advaita Vedanta is the name. But people sometimes have different 'darshans' however Upanishads which are summary of Vedas gives cue towards Advaita nature.
Well, I asked an hindu sage and he said that OM doesn't have any meaning because when you chant OM which has no meaning this will make our mind to stop thinking because it can't relate it anything that is related to OM so you can meditate peacefully , Idk what is going on lol.
Nice job bro india need these types of channel kyuki aaj kal koi bhi science aur dharm ke nam par kuch bhi bol deta hai internet par aur log use hi sach man lete hai
Really nice ...and great to see that you said E=mc^2 means energy equivalent to it's mass not that what we can convert as said by einstein...a critical point... And also nice spoiler on spontaneous symmetry breaking
If OM= MC² , that means OM is nothing more than the energy stored in a given mass, and this also means that Hinduism is not a book of religion, it's the book of science, so technically following Hinduism is equivalent to following atheism. Because Hinduism says OM is a divine thing which OM=MC² disproves that means there is no god 🎉
Ahh yes , my favourite energy is em waves which are stored in a given mass . The logic is insane , does science belong to atheists only ? Being atheist ≠ being a scientist or the representative of science. Lets ignore the OM=MC² for once , as that is debatable. You said just because it has science, it is not a book or religion? According to that logic , Ramayan is also not a book of religion as it talks about how to be a good ruler , how to be passionate etc . According to that logic , our constitution is a book of religion, since it has a photo of ramayan Be smart , as atheism ≠ being smart 🤓
@@For_watching_yt 😃 nice atleast you've said something. First of all, science doesn’t "belong" to atheists, but atheism often aligns with science because it questions unproven claims and relies on evidence. This doesn’t mean every scientist is an atheist, but critical thinking and skepticism are essential for scientific progress. Blind belief, on the other hand, often stands in opposition to this process. Now, about OM-MC², I’ll agree it’s debatable. But if OM is equated to energy (as per the equation), it loses its divine nature and becomes just another natural phenomenon. That’s exactly why the divine claim of OM doesn’t hold up when logic and science are applied. Coming to your analogy between the Ramayan and the constitution, it’s flawed. The Ramayan, while teaching values, is still rooted in religious mythology and divine narratives. The Indian Constitution, on the other hand, is a secular legal document. Including a picture of the Ramayan doesn’t transform it into a religious text-it’s simply cultural symbolism, not a theological statement. Finally, intelligence isn’t exclusive to atheists, but let’s be real: blind faith and refusing to question inherited beliefs don’t equate to being smart. Intelligence lies in questioning, analyzing, and seeking truth based on evidence. If your argument is that religion and science can coexist, then demonstrate it with evidence instead of flawed analogies and rhetoric. Be smart-faith doesn’t replace logic.
@@mdxparadox6345 "The Indian Constitution, on the other hand, is a secular legal document. Including a picture of the Ramayan doesn't transform it into a religious text" Just as one picture of ramayan doesn't transform the constitution into a religious book , in the same way , OM=MC² doesn't make OM lose its divine significance. And about questioning , most of the things , be it from atheists or theists , are not questioned. I have been around many atheists and theists , who have learnt about the battery , how does the battery transfer energy ? How does the electricity flow? No one knows , take the commentators of this video for example, ask them this question. If they had questioned how the battery works , they would be knowing, but they wouldn't know , means they never questioned. These atheists , who claim to be intellect , and laugh at theists as they have not questioned their gods , themselves never questioned what they learnt.
@@mdxparadox6345 I have met an atheist, who claimed Buddhism to be older than Hinduism. His argument= UNESCO says that rigveda is not older than 600 years. (He most probably listened to some RUclipsr who made this claim and never questioned) I opened the UNESCO report on rigveda , I read the few starting pages . Found this statement: • Pg-7 The oldest of this manuscript is from 1464 AD This was his argument point. • but he didn't read the starting pages of their hunt of old manuscripts, and out of the 30 they found the oldest is from 1464 AD • Pg-8 ( the next page ) oldest portions are perhaps three millennial old. I never got a reply from him again. This is the blind faith of atheists 😭
Bhaiya hum hazar bar inko debunk karenge Hazaro arguments dete rahenge phir bhi yeh lichar kabhi sudhrenge nahi. Kyuki inko dharm ka dhanda chalana hain.. Bhad mein jaye rationality, bhadd mein jaye science inko chahiye chuthiye Audience aur andha paisa.. sab kuch paisa or power ka hi lalach hainn. Sirf social media se kuch nahi hoga agar yeh sab bandh karna chahte hain toh pehele education system ko badalna padega.. Science, philosophy sabkuch shikhana padega.. lekin kash aisa hota. U know bhaiya hum yaha pe jitne bhi Rational log hain sabhi ne khudse apne Thinking ko aise develop kiya hain. Agar humare aspas ke teacher professors, parents sabhi log rational ban jaye tab sayad iye dikkat khatam ho sakta hain.. pata nahi yaar kab tak chalega yeh sab.. but. Anyways Good job Bhaiya... Aise hi aur videos late raho ..❤❤❤
@@GREEDFORKNOWLEDGE-vb5fb true i agree Aapne philosophy ki baat Maine iska interpretation aise Kiya please correct me You are talking about Darshan and Upanishads and you want to teach them in school so people know the true ideology and philosophy of Vedic dharma that they have deep explanations in metaphysics and exploring reality
@@GREEDFORKNOWLEDGE-vb5fb Or bhai aap ko mujhe batana tha ki Hyper quest ne om equal to mc2 kyu bola Usne yeh nhi bola ki yeh formula Rishi ka hai yeh modern science ki hi hai Bas baat yeh hai ki E matlb energy and om matlb bhi energy hota hai isliya interchangeable hai bass
@@GREEDFORKNOWLEDGE-vb5fb Hyper quest bahut modern temperament ka aadmi hai Aap uski ved vs vigyan yeh athiest vs thiest debate dekho bahut hi acha hai na ki koi andhbhakt
Apki explanation bahot achi thi Bas ek baat point out karna chahunga Aapne bola water me detergent milao mass energy conversion hoga Lekin wahan mass energy conversion nahi hoga kyu ki wahan law of conservation of mass follow hota hai Mass energy conversion sirf nuclear reaction me hoga jahan mass defect milta hai kyu ki ek nuclues dusre me convert ho jata hai
That’s actually a misconception, even I use to think that way earlier but then I came across this paper “E=mc^2 and the weight of energy” by Fabiana (2018) Basically conservation of mass is our physical inability to measure the minimal reduced mass. That’s why even in my video I said that we cannot measure it practically. I guess there’s a simple explanation to this in one of the video of Fermilab (I don’t remember which one) but that has also covered this. Just to make it more intuitive, every reaction either exothermic or endothermic is one way or another playing role in mass energy or energy mass conversion.
🕉️=mc^2, aum is representing the non-dulality of vedanta. SAND haven't yet provided research paper or any formulation that compelled with valid scientific reasoning. It's better that you described non-dulality than neutrinos aren't massless. Watching video almost senses like instagram creator finding physics in cartoon.
Atyendra duffer insaan hai, esa lag raha hai koi 10 ka student formula explain kar raha hai😂😂 Formula ka basis mass conversion naki mass moving in speed of light agar esa hota toh formula mai (Pc)² add karne ki kya zarurat thee
How to make money being a scientist in present times? Propose a hypothesis which supports the agenda of everything came from our scriptures. Be good with tailoring the evidence. Write a research paper. Shout on social media and brag about our culture.
Bro one more suggestion if you are not able to understand 2 things equally then how can you say that they are not correct . I am not against your thought process .
@Rikky-the-UnstoppableBuddhism is older !! Hinduism and vedism are different, Buddhism derived from vedism not Hinduism. Hinduism itself newer than Buddhism
You can't win an argument against a fool
-albertEinstein
Wait that was Mark Twain who said this quote 😂
@_NOFU I just heard it somewhere,but didn't know who said it😭.
@@KlNG____340see listen angrez ke pille mein vigyan aur Dharm pe vishwas rakhta hu par tum log vohi jo internet pe particularly ek Dharam ko target karte ho fir moot nikal jati ha samne ane pe why you people having that much hatred
@@KlNG____340wow what a rationality 😅😂
جوابِ جاہلاں خاموشی باشد
Wait till F=ma-bhavani
😂
Underrated comment!!
😂
🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂
Beautifully explained! 👌 These pseudoscientific claims and people peddling them must be called out!
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindi आपका youtube channel भी बहुत अच्छा है। आप भी भारतीय समाज में scientific temperament को बढ़ा रहे हैं। 🙏🙏♥️♥️
amazing and feel good to see RUclips channels like you and Kshitij and others (bio shala, logical aayam ...)
Another science loving channel ❤
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindi maine indono ka channel pichle 3 din mai subscribe kia h youtube ne recommend Kiya tha
Thanks a lot, also love your work
To be honest, I see this as a bit of a failure from the scientific community. Science has become centered around these conversations by celebrity scientists or rich capitalists like Elon Musk etc. I have an engineering degree from an IIT and a master's from IISc and I can't wrap my head around a lot of these ideas. Most people in our country do not need knowledge of particle physics, let alone unproven ideas like string theory or multiverse theory. But pop-science is full of this. Religiopolitical groups can very easily exploit the vagueness around the terms in these areas and benefit from gullibility of masses.
A lot of my colleagues and co-workers struggle with simple ideas like scientific method, logic, epistemology, falsifiability, design of experiments, statistical significance etc. These are the things which are of way more significance to the common man. Even if they do not provide employment directly, these things can help people develop a rational outlook and at the very least save their hard-earned money from scamsters.
That’s so true and insightful
Hello, Mr. Pranav.
Please reply to my comment.
I'm interested to have a talk with you. I'm a student of MIT .
@@S-tb4sc Ok, I'm listening.
@@pranav210591that's obviously a bait
The fear of disillusionment is compelling these propaganda machinery to devise a novel correlation between science and mythology and surprisingly in the crux of this propagation, they are saying that past civilisation was even more advanced and should be brought back to the current era. Ultimately, making a conservative back steps to the pasts which never existed the way it is visualised now.
For Andhbhakts - Science एक कल्पना मात्र
😂
और सुधांशु त्रिवेदी के लिए साइंस मेरा नाना मात्र😂
Agar science bekar hai toh religion bekar^♾️ times bekar hua.
Andhanamzi chadarm09
For Islam science z kafir 😂
Bro didn't disrespect any religion bro debunked misconceptions I am writing to show respect to my bro chad bro 🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
Dharm Khatre Me Hai ❌
Science Khatre Me Hai ✅
As long as rationality exists we can maintain scientific temperament
@@astrokshitijSure! ❤
People who say that everything is already present in the Vedas are very stupid.The basic concept of the Hindu santan dhrama is to seek.It says that we cannot simply believe anything just because someone said or because it is written somewhere.It even tells us to not blindly believe something "god"says.Its just the idea of seeking to seek and learn not to believe.Here,both the dharm and and science are in danger.People use any pseudoscience to correlate it to science and prove themselves correct
I don't know why I wrote all of this.Maybe because I am too fed up with people saying things like "aum=mc^2"
Beauty of science is that nothing is known and everyone can put their opinion and there is always room for improvement in science.
Religion and science should never be mixed. Im a religious person but that is something about my personal feelings and beliefs something that feels like a place of peace and hope to keep living. But just making all that nonsense claims ki hame to sb pata hai?
As a student of physics Its so frustrating to look at people just taking the years of efforts and work a scientist is putting in coming up with great ideas and theories so lightly and stating ki hmare yaha to we knew this already.
And as a hindu its embarassing as well
Dharma is something which should be there to keep you going on the right track .
Om = mc^2??? 😂😂 Its so funny to think ki koi itna creative soch raha hai
And with such confidence
I might read a 100 books over a topic and still not gef this amount of confidence on speaking something about it
Choti - you are too young to understand about Vedas, Vedanta and Upanishads. All I can say right now study hard and understand the basic concepts once you are free take out time to study basic of Quantum Physic and then read Vedanta to begin with...then you will understand.
Santhan Dharam has three major approaching angles.(no one ever will tell you this - people make million of dollars out of this)
1. From religious point of view - when and where people do rituals and pray goddess and gods (mainly temples and astrology, kundali (horoscope), remedies, mantras jaap etc)
2. As a way of life - following traditions and culture ( pitr sharadha, yoga, meditation, focusing on inner self that what you are describing " development of philosophies" not marrying in same gotra (due to blood fusion) preserving mother earth by using natural produce for eg...cow's milk, urine, cow dung, by planting trees, being kind to animals, birds etc)
3. From quantum physic point of view - This is where things get spiced up 👻👻....here the gods & goddess are NOT gods & goddess as we are told or know - but taken as huge force fields spread across space - that's why we also know - brahma as the creator, vishnu - as the preserver and shiva - as the destroyer. besides like devi kali compared to black hole as symbolism of tongue that she licked blood of "rakth beez" where ever it feel - thus black hole - absorbs everything even light...see the "reference" this is just in a nutshell I am explaining.
Problem is that Indians who are good in Vedic knowledge (Sanskirt) they are poor in Quantum Physic (English) and vice versa..that's why when vedic acharya try to explain they are unable to explain from "science" point of view and when quantum physicists try to explain they are unable to pin point the Vedic reference... so people think its "cherry picking" and they often laugh calling it pseudo science.
@@AlienBabUfo metaphors aint science lil bro and its right this is pseudoscience fuck those sanatan reveals and vigyan darshan
@@AlienBabUfo Gawaar, your brain is not developed enough to understand science.
@@AlienBabUfo Okay if Vedas are so good than tell me what your Acharyas who specifically are good in Vedic knowledge have achieved using them? tell me something that currently exists not just in textbook that was created by using vedas. you'll won't find anything because current Vedic knowledge is just philosophy with morals and ethics. there is nothing you can do scientific with it. our "scientific knowledge" which was "true" vadas were burned during mugal raj. and what made me so pissed about your comment is that it doesn't make any sense bro. just. stop. spreading. garbage. you are harming Hinduism by doing that. Om=MC^2 literally doesn't mean anything. your logic is like because i can move and an aeroplane can also move therefore, I'm an aeroplane guys i am AEROPLANE. claiming such idiotic things make our community look illiterate to outsiders/newcomers and that's exactly what you are doing.
oh yeah btw i'm Science major currently studying Quantum mechanics.
@@KyuNhiHoRahiPadhai-i2h""major currently studying Quantum mechanics." ok - "consciousness creates energy and energy creates mass" can you give me an equation for this ?? don't worry wrong or right or what ever you may think or comes in your mind....i am NOT going to judge you but its your lucky day maybe you get some magic stuff to hear and think......to help > take Consciousness = {e0 =1} as per H Hu and M Wu. 😉
I am waiting for F = ma bhawani 😂
😂 ruko thoraa our vikash hone do Bharat kaa phir Jo Jo scientist log khoje h usko hindu scripture se jodenge 😂
Like your budhdha😂😂😂@@GauriladiesTailor
@@rajeshjaiswal8878 budhha ?
@GauriladiesTailor budhdha😂😂😂😂
@@rajeshjaiswal8878 iam not budhha
2010: We'll have flying cars by 2024💀
2024: Debunking some random lumbo jumbo baseless claim🤡
Nasa is the separate fan base of these andhbhakts😂
Poor Nasa, the US government didn't fund them enough as they do for the military so Nasa couldn't buy a 15 k ₹ Vedic physics book from Amazon so they call our great great great..... [2000 years later] great Acharya Agnivrat, but our Acharya ji is patriotic so he rejected their offer. Now he will collaborate with ISRO and our nation will be going to develop an anti gravity vehicle soon 🤯🧠.
Us government take Nasa name from nasadiya sukt of rigveda
@@Dakshinachar_Sanatani_00002 ye sunke Nasa ko nashe karne ki adat ho gai 💀
Haa wnko to or kam nehi hay 😂😂😂😂
@@PremGamer-z1i we should put copyright strike on Nasa
For copy the name of nasa from nasadiya sukt of rigveda .
Yahi nhi Om =mc², Gravity, Pascal, HP, Acceleration, Speed, Atomic Bomb, Univers, AI , Multiverse 😂😂😂😅
E in E=MC² stands for Energy
Now if you denote any letter with energy it will not change the equation
If you denote 🕉 with energy and not God or anything else
It will not change the equation
Hey Kshitij I don't have words to describe your efforts, your courage, your calmness to address these utter pseudo science claims by these RUclipsrs.
I always wanted to make these kind of videos to debunk these clowns but since I didn't able to study Physics and further higher studies, becoz I entered in corporate world to support my family. Becoz to debunk these kind of sophistication pseudo science you need to have good understanding of the subject.
Again I appreciate your wittines to address the issue without any gali galauj.
Thank you.
Ye formula dekhkar meri hasi nahi ruk rahi .. andbakt kitne chutiyen ho sakten h 😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂💯💯
😂😂😂
😂😂
😂😂💯🤝🏻
😂
Om=mc²❌
Hyper quest=(MC)²✅
Bro bas MC bolo
@@Raj-ox2kxNahi bhai vo (MC)×(MC) hai🤣
@@artisharma.... sorry bhai aapka equation ka proof bhi ha 😁😁
😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂
It’s essential to address misinformation or misunderstandings with facts and respectful dialogue. While everyone is entitled to their opinions in the comment section, it’s important that we engage in conversations about science, religion, or culture with respect and sensitivity toward others. In the case of debunking a scientific claim like E = mc², it’s best to focus on the facts and provide logical reasoning. Attacking or making inappropriate comments about someone's religion or beliefs only distracts from the core discussion and contributes to negativity. Let’s keep the conversation constructive and focused on understanding each other better.
10:12 yes, we need a vedio on neutrino
1:52 it might sound dumb but AS BEST AS I UNDERSTAND motion and rest are relative to the subject. Is this somehow accounted for?
There is nothing called "absolute rest" or "absolute motion". They are always told with respect to some reference frame.
Frame of reference ( 11th physics)
Frame of reference
you aren’t dumb for that. They are indeed relative. To keep it simple, in relativity there is one more concept called relativistic mass which increases with speed. And E = MC2 is just a simplified equation for rest condition.
@@haneechaitanya3832 right, but how do I define rest. Is it in rest for me or is it universally in rest(which seems illogical) so how do we define that rest that is what I would like to know, thanks for the reply tho.
The same people claim that 'havan' produces tons of oxygen, totally denying the existence of CO2 😂
"You can't win an argument with an idiot"
- Mark Twain
This video is increasing my curiosity in Physics. I left Physics after school, but it always amazes me. I want to learn it as a hobby someday 😊😊😇
Press F= To pay respects
Mujhe pahli bar tumhara channel meri feed mein dikha, yaar Kitna achcha video banate Ho. Aur tujhe Maine subscribe bhi Kiya kyunki tera Gyan bahut kam ka hai.
Thank You ! Bahut accha video banaya.
Found your channel, probably because of the thumbnail and title. Very nicely explained and debunked. Great work.
Actually you can put anything on left side of equation as long as you claim that it is having dimension of energy, replacing E by Om or any other symbol that represents the content of energy. Key idea is it must be some form of equivalence of energy. For example, let's say a mass defect gets converted to energy in a nuclear reaction which is equivalent to 20,000 TNTs then same equation can be written in terms of TNTs. Argument of relative motion also doesn't hold good, because frame of reference is arbitrary. This video is good explanation of E=mc2 but that's it.
So are you saying that Om = MC² could be correct equation provided that Om is dimension of energy or equivalence of energy?
@@Yash-972 I'm saying not just OM, you can replace it with anything having the same dimension and unit equivalence, that's how E has been put, it is supposed to show the total energy of the system, which itself needs the definition of being equivalent to something.
@@ChiragTripathi01 ohh I get it, thanks for clarifying!
@@ChiragTripathi01 Mr. Chirag, as much as I know, every mathematically correct equation is dimensionally correct. But the reverse case is not true.
You are claiming that anything which has same dimension as energy can be put in the equation in the place of energy. This will only ensure the dimensional correctness of the equation. Numerically the equation may be false.
@VinitChaubey448 True, it may be false but then it is not the problem of representation but the choice of units. Units can always be chosen in such a way so that this equation can be written in the required form. That's what we are doing with E also, in physics we really don't understand energy, it is always taken as equivalent to something such as in calories equivalent or Joules equivalent. Now Om is taken as one of the fundamental vibration and depending on how we define the equivalence E can be represented in terms of Oms as well and of course by any other form of energy. It may sound ridiculous but that's the way it is, Kshitij's point is to be precise in terms of energy but what I want to convey is neither we understand energy nor we understand Om intuitively but a form of similar expression can always be achieved by any array of representation.
Mera seedha sa sawal ye hai ki om = mc^2 bolna hi kyu hai bhai?
E = mc^2 se kaam chal hi raha to continue rakho, ye ek saath 4 chize mix kyu kar rhe?
Nahin bolenge to inka dharm ka dhandha kahan se chalega?
Are bhai vedanta hai brambha satya Jagat mithha,bramhha matalab atma paramatma super power koi uper mein ,aur jaggat matlab body ishko ye log jabardasti non duality ka name deke prove karn cha ta hai jab ki param atma ka koi prove nahi hai ,jake shankar digvijay ka book paro samjh jao ge ye log 21 century ke hisab se ishko fixed karne ke liye ishka matlab change kar diya 😂
21:49 bro wth are you doing then , no one just going around and saying om mc2 , you are comparing to china ??? Our Indian scientists are working hard tooo , they are not stuck to religious thing ....
Science is developing well in india .
Not at all ..
Yes ,it is !!! But it's limited to only a small proportion of our population.....most of the people here in our country aren't even familiar with science!!
@@12zswhat criteria are you judging that someone is familiar with science or not?
@@For_watching_yt I'm not judging...I'm just stating facts ,what's true is true .....I hope you're well aware of the education system in our country and know the literacy rate of our people here
@@12zs literacy rate is judged on the criteria if a person can write something in any language.
Now what is your criteria?
Like are you considering pHD or something as a criteria
Pandit Nehru's idea of the scientific temper is more relevant than ever. It doesn't neglect spirituality, but it does reject blind faith and superstitions.
Actually if you carefully look at the derivation of the relativistic mass momentum energy relation it is not really valid for m=0.
Bioshala of physics😮👍
Right 👍🏻
To all the haters he might not be the right person to educate about hindu scriptures but hindu do try to find cause and reason behind every occurance
Name a feild that Hindus hasnt wrote a book about
From biology to universe to kinematics to history to economics to trigonometry to architecture to music to RITUALS GHOST everything
Many were right many are proven wrong but at least they tried to do something better for the world than THE "KEYWORD WARRIORS" HERE
TRUE! Hindus have scientific knowledge..
every single civilization has done that
@@MainHarshit Nope that's not true. most of our scientific knowledge was burned in mugal raj. what is left is just philosophy and moral ethics. average hindu doesn't even have fraction of current science knowledge because if this is science than wtf am i doing at school? our current science have root with vedic time but that's it. after that most of the science has been reformed by west countries. also @NishanT_ACM there is nothing in quantum field theory that was wrote by ancient india.
@@Nishkarsh-gc5yr Nope my friend. India was wealthiest and had most "scientific knowledge" in acient times more than greece, rome and Persians. but it can't be said same today because mugals burned the university that had our most of the knowledge and left us with nothing.
@@KyuNhiHoRahiPadhai-i2hname that particular incident where mughal burned the scientific documents down
By the way E=mc^2 does not have any mathematical derivation prove it is formula to convert mass into energy given by Sir Albert Einstein
It does, dada
@abu-karz nope i am physicsist . The prof some books wrote they just try to reach the E=mc^2. Even in Einstein reached papers he directly wrote the formula is even Einstein didn't prove then its prove doesn't exist.
@@theadityasahu07what? If it's not proven then how it is accepted ? Just want to know😅
@@Bruh..93667its proportionality formula
@@theadityasahu07so there is not any constant or any experiment done .
These spokespersons and self-proclaimed preacher want the entire great things, knowledge, formulae, individuals to align with Hinduism to portray themselves great 😂😂😂
The way you explained what is the mass..is something extraordinary... keep it up..like to see more videos like this...
The most funny fact is that the pseudo scientists who don't understand science, also don't understand om.
Saying Om = mc² is not only disrespectful to science but also shameful to spirituality.
As far as I know Vedic literature deals with liberation of self, not modern science.
Behtareen Explanation 👏
Dhanyawaad Mitra
wow what a explaination...only bcoz of you we can can explain properly infront of andhbhakt..thank you so much
beta samne aajaoge to muh nhi khulega sudhanshu sir k samne 😂
@nkmotivation12 are haa vahi naa jinhone noble award jeeta hai?? Psuedoscience me
Om is mentioned as energy and vibration.....hence we can say it
Om = mc²
Om is not any energy, it represents non-duality. The world is not just made up of energy, it also has matter so energy alone can't represent non-duality.
Om = 0*∞
This is the correct equation of non-duality.
Bhai 😂Bramhha satya Jagat mithha ye hai asli vedanta ishko ye log jabardasti cher char karke ye sab banya believe nahi hota Shankar digvijay ke book paro ,ye log slokh ke sath cher char kar raha hai ,aur ishi karan se madhavacharya ne troll kiya tha aur bola tha brambha jo hota o aur ham same nahi hai ushka atma aur Hamara atmma alakh hai ,but Shankracharya ne bola tha pramatma ka ham ak ansh hai
@Rikky-the-Unstoppable bro I am not talking about the word om i am talking about the sound Aum /Om ....om /aum itself is a type of vibration
@@studywithme-dh8iu bus kr bhai aur kitna hasayga tu ...non duality jaisa topic tere bus ki baat ni hai ..tu comment mat kr 😂😂
@@studywithme-dh8iu cher char to Madhwa logo ne kiya tha 😂 Hari Har me bhed karke paap kiya Madhwa ko bhi troll kiya jata hai
Bro make such type of more video , It is useful .।।। Great work❤
finally Physics Khatre me hai
ॐ = 0*∞
"Vedanta teaches that consciousness is singular, all happenings are played out in one universal consciousness and there is no multiplicity of selves."
― Erwin Schrodinger
"After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of Quantum Physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly made much more sense."
― Werner Heisenberg
"I go into the Upanishads to ask questions."
― Niels Bohr
"The Vedanta and the Sankhya hold the key to the laws of mind and thought process which are co-related to the Quantum Field, i.e. the operation and distribution of particles at atomic and molecular levels"
― Brian David Josephson, Nobel loureate, Welsh Physicist
"What we shall find in Modern Physics is an exemplification, an encouragement and a refinement of old Hindu wisdom"
― J. Robert Oppenheimer, Theoretical Physicist
"Whenever I give a lecture on quantum physics, I feel as if I am talking on Vedanta"
― Prof. Dr. Hans-Peter Dürr (1929-2014) Nuclear Physicist
Newton believed in alchemy, that does not mean that Alchemy is real. It's just Newton was right about one thing and wrong about another.
@@30PrinceKumar08 Ok I am challenging you, prove the Sanatan Hindu philosophy of Advait Vedant is wrong.
Prove its right first lol @@Rikky-the-Unstoppable
At first ishka historical sitting bhi dekh lo Sunyabada ka copy bola jata hai Advaita vedanta ko and Adi Shankaracharya jishne ish advait vedanta ko adopt kiya tab budhism ushne bhi bola tha Sunyabada is right, madhavacharya Sunyabada and advait vedanta ko troll kiya tha ab bolo 😂@Rikky-the-Unstoppable
@studywithme-dh8iu koi murkh insaan hi Advait ko Sunyavad bolega. Sunyavad me Atma ko nahi maante par Advait me Atma hi sab kuch hai Atma hi Brahm hai. Dono philosophies me zameen aasman ka antar hai. Madhvacharya to Dvaitvadi hai wo to Advait ke khilaf bolenge hi par unhone Sunyavad ko bhi troll kiya ab ye nahi bataoge 😂
Super needed video
Thanks for the extensive research ☝🏻💪🏻☝🏻
Glad you liked it!
@@astrokshitij keep uploading bro ☝🏻☝🏻
These antiquity pleaders
Can't even interpret or make an antibiogram but still they claim, there is everything in Vedas 😌🤡
Dear sir, its just not that they don't know science, but unfortunately they don't know Upanishad and vedanta for sure. Om or akhashar brahma or ultimate truth of Self (as described in kath Upanishad, conversation between jam and nachiketa). Vedant direct one to understand the self and inner libaration from all internal conflicts of mind to reach Self. But unfortunately these semi literates also tranishing the things we should be proud of. They don't understand about adhyatma. So they wanted reflected glory by manufacturing such pathetic pseudo science. Very sad.
Are bhai thum sab sahi bol rha ho par ye samj nahi rahe ho ki om 🕉 hai na uska nam he hai energy aur thume ache se patha hai ki pura universe is made of energy and forms of energy yes or no?
Thats why 🕉 is a pura universa ka all forms of energy.
Therefore if you read upanishads from that we say that everything is om (energy) and the energy is god so god is everything and the energy is you because you also made up of energy thats why you are a energy (god) so you are god yourself. you(energy) were present everywhere.
If i am wrong please reply and ask questions i hope you understand.
E = mc² se mauje kuch be lena dena kuch nahi hai muje lina hai mass is a form of energy and energy is called 🕉 in Hinduism saying that everything is made by energy in upanishads
Phele pado upanishads ko bad me Hinduism ke bare mae comment karna socho
@@UnknownKing-ov7eh ruclips.net/video/Vs8PLfUBYoc/видео.htmlsi=PGVsUj2HDa95aOS3
ruclips.net/video/8jsHGOWk1lg/видео.htmlsi=SnETcQH4QkW3M1O4
@@UnknownKing-ov7eh as per kathopanishad om is representation of akshar Brahma or atma. Please difine Brahma.
Sarve veda jat padamamanmati sarvani cha jadbadanti/ jadichchhanto brahmacharjaranti tatte padam snghrahena brabimyomitetat.(1/2/15) etaddhebakhsharang Brahma etaddhebakhsharang param/ etaddhebakhsharang galntya Jo jadichchhati tasya tat.(1/2/16) from kathopanishad.
@@AlienBabUfo really!! Ooo soo inciteful🙈🙉🙊🤭😆😆😁. For your kind information, before giving such rats' fart, there are several translation works of vedas, Upanishads, Gitas available please go and check out first. Indeed there are three ways in hindu/sanatan dharma, gyan marg, karma marg and vakti marg, and first one is mandatory to follow last two properly. And one must have the key of vedanta (the main piller of Hinduism) to properly understand and decipher the meaning of all smriti sahitya. If anything in smriti sahitya contradicts veda and contradicts vedanta then it's to be discarded. For example astrology has no vedanta so it must be discarded.
Have you ever tried to understand Nirvanastakam by Adi Shankaracharya? If not please go through and try to understand. It's one of the classic example of neti neti and charaiveti charaiveti of vedanta. And for your kind information all those scriptures teach about atma gyan .. to observe the self ruthlessly and to be liberated from all the bond of desire.. Maya.. (vidya). It has it's own glory. Whereas science deals with all the outer thing (jagat, which includes leaving body also) that can be termed as avidya. Astabakra gita defines self as 'Nahm deho na me deho bodhohmiti nishchaya..' (11/6, 2/22).
Your explanations are simple and effective. Bhai you should start a new English channel to reach international audience.
Creators like you, are really needed, not only in India but worldwide
I'm really happy to see such scientific work from India,
That's why India is still developing countries 😂😂😂😂😂
Lekin baat ye hai ki om =mc² konse exam me use kr skte hai
Yeh toh sabse bade hindu desh India me he valid nhi hoga kya 😂
2:13 it does not "happen to be" that exact constant more accurately it is not square of speed of light but square of speed of causality it isn't a mere coincidence that E=mc^2 it's because information travels at maximum speed of c, it's because this speed is same in all reference frames not because it is speed of light but because it is speed of causality.
2:18 again, it isn't that just because it fits in the units or dimension, so it works but because it works, it fits in the units. You could argue that E=mv^2 where v is velocity of object or that E=w(dI/dt) where w is angular velocity of object and dI/dt just represents rate of change in moment of inertia (I) because you can see that right- and left-hand side have same dimensions but obviously this is not true.
10:08 Yes, please! A video on how NEUTRINOs get their mass would be awesome! I’m all for pure science-way more interesting than watching pseudoscience get roasted. Can’t wait!
I’ll tell you story from jain philosophy .. if some group of people try to understand (reality ) elephant then everybody start to touch every part of the elephant some people touches the tail somebody touches the trunk and some touches his body and then they are telling that reality is like rope ,spare and wall respectively but no one ever find what is the reality it … So they representing there version and you are representing yours ❤ I hope people will understand what I want to tell
Thankyou 😊
Sounds like shit it's still an elephant
Jo log in theory banane walo ko gali de rhe h andhbhakt keh rahe hai unse galat koi ho nhi sakta, samajh mein sabko aata h lekin ese majak banana koi intellectual nahi karta, ironically on the topic of science these comments are made.
So called Sigmas😂
Vhi tho kesa bhi kyu naa ho mc jesi gali ka use nhi karna chahiye even the top commenter are like this
@@Thewayoflife-mr5yd yes! Jo log keh rhe h science ko religion se mat jodo vahi log baar baar bol rhe h andhbhakt ye vo
Chup kar andhbhakt
@@grizzii2149Tu chup be andhnamazi/andhbauddh
wo sirf scientifically wrong nahi hindu spiritual philosophically bhi wrong hai to Jo hindu philosophy khojta hai use bhi research karni chahiye sirf Science guys ko nahi "Aum = mc²" na sirf science ke principles ke khilaaf hai, balki spirituality ke essence ko bhi distort karta hai. Aum ek spiritual aur universal concept hai, jo material boundaries se pare hai. Use ek physical formula mein bound karna na sirf uski anantta ko seemit karta hai, balki uske spiritual arth ka hani bhi karta hai. Science aur spirituality alag fields hain, unhe mix karna dono ki asli beauty ko kharaab karta hai. BTW mei ek Atheist hoon lekin tab bhi hindu philosophy acchi lagti hai isliye thodi knowledge acchi baat hai....
Why brother why ??? AUM / OM is the "root mantra" do you even understand what does it mean ?
1. Laws of energy has proven again and again everything in this universe is a wave or vibrating energy.
2. Consciousness creates energy and energy creates mass
3. Billion dollar question - Who controls the oscillatory movement in an atom so precise that if that movement is even slightly uneven....we all know neutrons, protons, electrons will collapse with the nucleus of that atom.
Who is controlling that "movement" who started that "movement" now you got the lead where OM / AUM comes from after all its the "root mantra"
Vedas Vedanta and Upanishads have three approach angle.
1. Spiritual - Meditation, Mantra jaaps, Kundali jagran, etc
2. A Way of life - Rituals, Havan, Celebration, Festivals, Yoga etc
3. Quantum Physic - Theories of everything.
First talk to some person dealing with Quantum Physic or Astro Physic before jumping into conclusion.
Learn advait vedant
@@AnalysisLegend aur baki dharm unko kya bolega😂😂😂😂
@@rajeshjaiswal8878 chapti dharti😂
महाभारत 4.72 ”…और कृष्ण ने पाण्डु के प्रत्येक यशस्वी पुत्र को अनेक दासियाँ, रत्न और वस्त्र दिए…” अनुवाद किसारी मोहन गांगुली
तो?
@kaushiksaha8416 "दासीया", "गुलाम" "female sláves" दान में दी।
They say MC^2 represents non duality, and Om also represents non duality.
So..... according to this analogy:
LGBTQ+ represents non duality, and Om represents non duality.
So according to their own logic, Om is same as LGBTQ+
I'm sure they'll love this! xDD
❤
Your critique is good but the analogy is wrong. LGBTQ+ means more than 2 meanwhile non-dualism means only 1.
@@tdj461 he is one of that lgbtq🤣🤣
@@tdj461 LGBTQ means just one 😂.. Lol
They made this term for this reason. Lesbian is just one specific gender. Not two..
@@suryashukla4036 don't impose your gender on others😂
Actually I think some of them don't want to say om is eaual to mc square as formula but like an overview, that just like modern physics, hindu texts knew non duality too
I appreciate you, your logical Sense is amazing.
I think using pseudo-science like this really tarnishes the beautiful philosophy Vedas have.
What philosophy do they have? I'm genuinely curious.
@@dariyababumalapati7144 Advaita Vedanta is the name. But people sometimes have different 'darshans' however Upanishads which are summary of Vedas gives cue towards Advaita nature.
@@dariyababumalapati7144padhke dekhle 🗿
Ministry of misinformation se aur kya ummid lagana
Great video
The calming background music really helps too
Nice work Bro....!! ❤ . U have such an inspiring personality ❤❤
I am just interested in background music here 🎶 😀
Bahut he acha video tha jitna is video se samajh aaya utna ajtak nahi aaya tha
Thanks a lot
Beautifully explained. Gave me the most brilliant expansion of the equation than ever. I hope the best for you.
Yes video on neutrino
आप चैनल के नाम में , क्षितिज को हिन्दी में क्यों नहीं लिख देते , खैर वीडियो बढ़िया था 👍 , विज्ञान को ऊंचे से ऊंचे स्थान भारत में दिलाना होगा
Well, I asked an hindu sage and he said that OM doesn't have any meaning because when you chant OM which has no meaning this will make our mind to stop thinking because it can't relate it anything that is related to OM so you can meditate peacefully , Idk what is going on lol.
3:15 de broglie 🔥🔥
Nice job bro india need these types of channel kyuki aaj kal koi bhi science aur dharm ke nam par kuch bhi bol deta hai internet par aur log use hi sach man lete hai
You are explaination is wonderful
Really nice ...and great to see that you said E=mc^2 means energy equivalent to it's mass not that what we can convert as said by einstein...a critical point...
And also nice spoiler on spontaneous symmetry breaking
SIR BAHUT HI SAHI KAAM KIYA HAI AAPNE 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 WELL DONE ❤
Are muje a samaj nahi araha om is bhasa language. A kahase energy ho gaya 😁😁😁😁
1] i watch your videos
2] i learn from u
3] Then i create my own video 😂
If OM= MC² , that means OM is nothing more than the energy stored in a given mass, and this also means that Hinduism is not a book of religion, it's the book of science, so technically following Hinduism is equivalent to following atheism. Because Hinduism says OM is a divine thing which OM=MC² disproves that means there is no god 🎉
Well written but so called religious people won't agree on this
Ahh yes , my favourite energy is em waves which are stored in a given mass .
The logic is insane , does science belong to atheists only ? Being atheist ≠ being a scientist or the representative of science.
Lets ignore the OM=MC² for once , as that is debatable. You said just because it has science, it is not a book or religion?
According to that logic , Ramayan is also not a book of religion as it talks about how to be a good ruler , how to be passionate etc .
According to that logic , our constitution is a book of religion, since it has a photo of ramayan
Be smart , as atheism ≠ being smart 🤓
@@For_watching_yt 😃 nice atleast you've said something.
First of all, science doesn’t "belong" to atheists, but atheism often aligns with science because it questions unproven claims and relies on evidence. This doesn’t mean every scientist is an atheist, but critical thinking and skepticism are essential for scientific progress. Blind belief, on the other hand, often stands in opposition to this process.
Now, about OM-MC², I’ll agree it’s debatable. But if OM is equated to energy (as per the equation), it loses its divine nature and becomes just another natural phenomenon. That’s exactly why the divine claim of OM doesn’t hold up when logic and science are applied.
Coming to your analogy between the Ramayan and the constitution, it’s flawed. The Ramayan, while teaching values, is still rooted in religious mythology and divine narratives. The Indian Constitution, on the other hand, is a secular legal document. Including a picture of the Ramayan doesn’t transform it into a religious text-it’s simply cultural symbolism, not a theological statement.
Finally, intelligence isn’t exclusive to atheists, but let’s be real: blind faith and refusing to question inherited beliefs don’t equate to being smart. Intelligence lies in questioning, analyzing, and seeking truth based on evidence. If your argument is that religion and science can coexist, then demonstrate it with evidence instead of flawed analogies and rhetoric.
Be smart-faith doesn’t replace logic.
@@mdxparadox6345 "The Indian Constitution, on the other hand, is a secular legal document. Including a picture of the Ramayan doesn't transform it into a religious text"
Just as one picture of ramayan doesn't transform the constitution into a religious book , in the same way , OM=MC² doesn't make OM lose its divine significance.
And about questioning , most of the things , be it from atheists or theists , are not questioned.
I have been around many atheists and theists , who have learnt about the battery , how does the battery transfer energy ? How does the electricity flow?
No one knows , take the commentators of this video for example, ask them this question. If they had questioned how the battery works , they would be knowing, but they wouldn't know , means they never questioned.
These atheists , who claim to be intellect , and laugh at theists as they have not questioned their gods , themselves never questioned what they learnt.
@@mdxparadox6345 I have met an atheist, who claimed Buddhism to be older than Hinduism.
His argument= UNESCO says that rigveda is not older than 600 years.
(He most probably listened to some RUclipsr who made this claim and never questioned)
I opened the UNESCO report on rigveda , I read the few starting pages . Found this statement:
• Pg-7 The oldest of this manuscript is from 1464 AD
This was his argument point.
• but he didn't read the starting pages of their hunt of old manuscripts, and out of the 30 they found the oldest is from 1464 AD
• Pg-8 ( the next page ) oldest portions are perhaps three millennial old.
I never got a reply from him again.
This is the blind faith of atheists 😭
9:08 sir does didn't follow the law of conservation of mass
Our friend studied so much science but still unemployed and begging in RUclips😢
Sudhanshu Trivedi ji is having phd in mechanical engineering
So aswome explanation........with rich scientific knowledge....
Can u plz make a video about time and its scientific understanding
Bhai ab mai school mai ye sab gyaan failaaunga aur scientist ban jaaunga 😆
Fundamentaly dekha jaye to ha ham om likh sakte hai om choro ham kuch bhi likh skte hai E ki jagh. E is just a representative of momentum nothing else
Bhaiya hum hazar bar inko debunk karenge Hazaro arguments dete rahenge phir bhi yeh lichar kabhi sudhrenge nahi. Kyuki inko dharm ka dhanda chalana hain.. Bhad mein jaye rationality, bhadd mein jaye science inko chahiye chuthiye Audience aur andha paisa.. sab kuch paisa or power ka hi lalach hainn. Sirf social media se kuch nahi hoga agar yeh sab bandh karna chahte hain toh pehele education system ko badalna padega.. Science, philosophy sabkuch shikhana padega.. lekin kash aisa hota. U know bhaiya hum yaha pe jitne bhi Rational log hain sabhi ne khudse apne Thinking ko aise develop kiya hain. Agar humare aspas ke teacher professors, parents sabhi log rational ban jaye tab sayad iye dikkat khatam ho sakta hain.. pata nahi yaar kab tak chalega yeh sab.. but. Anyways Good job Bhaiya... Aise hi aur videos late raho ..❤❤❤
@@GREEDFORKNOWLEDGE-vb5fb true i agree
Aapne philosophy ki baat Maine iska interpretation aise Kiya please correct me
You are talking about Darshan and Upanishads and you want to teach them in school so people know the true ideology and philosophy of Vedic dharma that they have deep explanations in metaphysics and exploring reality
@@GREEDFORKNOWLEDGE-vb5fb Or bhai aap ko mujhe batana tha ki
Hyper quest ne om equal to mc2 kyu bola
Usne yeh nhi bola ki yeh formula Rishi ka hai yeh modern science ki hi hai
Bas baat yeh hai ki
E matlb energy and om matlb bhi energy hota hai isliya interchangeable hai bass
@@GREEDFORKNOWLEDGE-vb5fb Hyper quest bahut modern temperament ka aadmi hai
Aap uski ved vs vigyan yeh athiest vs thiest debate dekho bahut hi acha hai na ki koi andhbhakt
Apki explanation bahot achi thi
Bas ek baat point out karna chahunga
Aapne bola water me detergent milao mass energy conversion hoga
Lekin wahan mass energy conversion nahi hoga kyu ki wahan law of conservation of mass follow hota hai
Mass energy conversion sirf nuclear reaction me hoga jahan mass defect milta hai kyu ki ek nuclues dusre me convert ho jata hai
That’s actually a misconception, even I use to think that way earlier but then I came across this paper “E=mc^2 and the weight of energy” by Fabiana (2018)
Basically conservation of mass is our physical inability to measure the minimal reduced mass. That’s why even in my video I said that we cannot measure it practically. I guess there’s a simple explanation to this in one of the video of Fermilab (I don’t remember which one) but that has also covered this.
Just to make it more intuitive, every reaction either exothermic or endothermic is one way or another playing role in mass energy or energy mass conversion.
Thank you I got to know a completely new thing which I was totally unaware of even after having an M. Sc in physics
Very good work for humanity
We want a video on nitrino
(Andhbhaqt)² ×56"=0 😅😅😅😮
Bhai ki audience ke liye meta physics pe baat karna matlab science pe baat karna
🕉️=mc^2, aum is representing the non-dulality of vedanta. SAND haven't yet provided research paper or any formulation that compelled with valid scientific reasoning.
It's better that you described non-dulality than neutrinos aren't massless. Watching video almost senses like instagram creator finding physics in cartoon.
Why are you stupid?
Non duality is dilusion
@@tarqpravah you understand what is vedanta
@@mr.plasmagaming807 Vedanta is flawed concept
@@tarqpravah ohhh! Name me one vedanta with its core philosophy
BGM name pls ?????
17:45 Light ki speed alag alag hoti hai pani me glass me 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Atyendra duffer insaan hai, esa lag raha hai koi 10 ka student formula explain kar raha hai😂😂
Formula ka basis mass conversion naki mass moving in speed of light agar esa hota toh formula mai (Pc)² add karne ki kya zarurat thee
Actuall, its
E/c^2 = M
Mass can be converted to pure energy thats were atomic bomb created.
Loved your explanation of the equation
Background music is UNNECESSARY and has spoiled this good video. Please do not play music. We want to concentrate on each and every word of this video
Will keep that point in mind next time
How to make money being a scientist in present times?
Propose a hypothesis which supports the agenda of everything came from our scriptures.
Be good with tailoring the evidence.
Write a research paper.
Shout on social media and brag about our culture.
Great content ❤❤❤
Bro one more suggestion if you are not able to understand 2 things equally then how can you say that they are not correct . I am not against your thought process .
Om mani padme hum. Find out where did om originally came from.
What is om ?
Om originally came from Sanatan Hindu Dharm
@@Rikky-the-Unstoppable ohh boy your studies are incomplete
@@SujataAthor Hinduism is older than Buddhism. Om belongs to Hinduism, it represent non-duality.
ॐ = 0*∞
@Rikky-the-UnstoppableBuddhism is older !!
Hinduism and vedism are different, Buddhism derived from vedism not Hinduism.
Hinduism itself newer than Buddhism
Next we need qurand Debunk of flat earth And sun revovle around earth
He will not do this as a line says _________ ki saza , sar tan se juda
Or electron ka mass k,ha se ata hai fr?
Oil drop experiment se