Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.

Canon RF 28-70mm 2.0 one year later (with examples)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 авг 2024
  • In this video I'm talking about Canon RF 28-70 2.0 L lense, and my thoughts about using it as a professional for more than a year now.
    get the RF 28-70 2.0 L here amzn.to/3Wp7H3W
    ______________________________________
    buy me a coffee: paypal.me/tomislavmoze
    ______________________________________
    By using links below for your purchases you are supporting me and this channel :)
    The Cameras I use:
    Canon Eos R6mk2
    amzn.to/3PTTI3s
    Canon Eos R5
    amzn.to/3FToS6t
    Canon Eos R6
    amzn.to/3C3ep7j
    My cameras hang on amzn.to/3nu0Kxn
    Lenses I use:
    The all arounder - amzn.to/3WsMeqP
    The commercial - workhorse amzn.to/3Wp7H3W
    All I ever need - amzn.to/3vfAuvQ
    This lens made more money than Bill Gates - amzn.to/3hTQEb6
    The ones I carry into mountains - amzn.to/3VpsT8G and amzn.to/3WFqjfu
    When something is to far for other lenses - amzn.to/3hUjNmA
    Lights I use for video:
    best light ever
    amzn.to/3hTMHTL
    Lights I use for photo:
    amzn.to/3jqn51b
    microphones I use:
    amzn.to/3YRUjac
    when my cards are not enough I shot externally to -amzn.to/3WN2ouI
    Backpack I use - amzn.to/3C3FJTf
    my go to earphones - amzn.to/3XuIwgh
    I sold my iPad pro for this one - amzn.to/3XxYHtw
    The best iPad mini keyboard case - amzn.to/3X9BTjD
    computer that I edit on - amzn.to/3H75qoU
    As an Amazon Associate, I earn a small commission from qualifying purchases. Some of the links are affiliate links and if you decide to buy the gear through them I earn a tiny commission. It costs you nothing but helps me big time in keeping these videos coming.
    _______________________________________________________________
    FOLOW ME
    instagram:
    @tomislavmoze / tomislavmoze
    @Ctrl_Esc_ / ctrl_esc_
    facebook:
    / tomislav.moze
    website:
    www.tomislavmoze.com
    500px:
    500px.com/moze

Комментарии • 101

  • @RWAquariumPages
    @RWAquariumPages Год назад +1

    great video! i really love that you've posted your images instead of straight talking about the lens. I'm seriously considering getting one. thanks for this!

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  11 месяцев назад

      Glad you liked the video ☺️ thank you for the lovely comment! ☺️

  • @mariolopez.photographer
    @mariolopez.photographer 2 года назад +3

    Great video for an extremely awesome lens!!! I love it!! Also your photos are Wow!!!! Love your work!

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад

      thank you, this means a lot! Definitely a boost in self-confidence to do more reviews!

  • @skyscraperfan
    @skyscraperfan Год назад +7

    The psychology part is really funny. I heard from some photographers, that they always put a battery grip on their Sony camera to make it look bigger, even if they do not need the battery grip at all for that shoot.
    And I hope the RF system stays for much longer than ten years.

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  Год назад +2

      Haha I hope also 😁

    • @whiterock1865
      @whiterock1865 Год назад +2

      @@TomislavMoze Yeah that 10 year figure sounds like it was pulled out of yer arse! ha ha Jeesh how long has the EF mount been around, since 1987 so 35 years. Canon did it right so they have a lot of room with it, where sony has kinda stuck themselves a bit with the e-mount flange size for stabilization etc. So what's wrong with Fuji? ;)

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  Год назад +2

      @@whiterock1865 Haha Well I said at least. But you are right it’s gonna stay her long time. Technology changes extremely fast so who knows. Fuji cameras have nice specs but at the end if you exclude the medium sensor models they are just toys 😂

  • @MarcS4R
    @MarcS4R 2 года назад +1

    thanks for your review, great sample images here

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад

      Thank you ☺️ and thank you for watching ☺️

  • @kushyah7832
    @kushyah7832 2 года назад +2

    I like the idea of it being heavy enough for taking away handshake

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад

      yeah it is you win some you lose some situation... great while you filming bad when you are carrying it around 😅

  • @christophercox5633
    @christophercox5633 Год назад

    Enjoyed your wisdom on this lens. I will be buying it at some point for my new R3. Thank you.

  • @alexander.starbuck
    @alexander.starbuck 2 года назад +2

    Brooo! Welcome BACK! 🥲❤

  • @patrikmarcan
    @patrikmarcan 2 года назад +3

    Sample photos are 🔥🔥🔥

  • @janvu
    @janvu 2 года назад +1

    Haha stoked to see your work for Staropramen 🤩

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад

      Thank you for watching...it was always nice to work for Staropramen, they always had incredible cast to work with and a decent production so you could do a lot!

  • @PB-sz1cw
    @PB-sz1cw 2 года назад +1

    Very helpful 👌

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад

      thank you for watching! Glad I could help!

  • @23420b
    @23420b 2 года назад +3

    Thx so much🙌

  • @vaskoobscura_
    @vaskoobscura_ 2 года назад +1

    Zdravo, Thanks for this video your insights were valuable.

  • @Prabhu_njd
    @Prabhu_njd 2 года назад +5

    I have this lens and it's the most used lens in all my 3 rf lenses.

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад +1

      Yeah, I always go straight for it :D For what type of stuff do you use it?

    • @Prabhu_njd
      @Prabhu_njd 2 года назад +2

      @@TomislavMoze I mostly do portraits and events.

  • @ShotByCurt
    @ShotByCurt 2 года назад +1

    Great video! I was definitely considering and still an. I have the version 1 EF and love it!

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад +1

      Hey Curt, thank you for watching! If I understood correctly you have the 24-70 mk1 EF?
      That is a solid lens, but man the 28-70 is optically different universe :D :D

    • @ShotByCurt
      @ShotByCurt 2 года назад +1

      @@TomislavMoze Yea the mark 1. It’s that good?! I might have to pull the trigger! Thanks for the recommendation 👊🏾

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад +1

      It is incredible, but take in a consideration that I live from photo and video production and for me it was a easy decision, if you are just building your business there could be a better investments for you :D

    • @ShotByCurt
      @ShotByCurt 2 года назад +2

      @@TomislavMoze I live from it as well. Definitely a hefty price tag but the investment is worth it for the long term. Plus I’d love to ditch the adapter and go straight RF in most cases. Thanks a lot!

  • @dryrainwetsun
    @dryrainwetsun 6 месяцев назад +1

    💯 agree very nice video

  • @IgorCecelja
    @IgorCecelja 2 года назад +1

    Ladies and gentleman 📢 He's back 🤘

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад +1

      I hope this time I'm here to stay 😂

  • @foodoris
    @foodoris 2 года назад +2

    Finally! ☺️🙌

  • @mxilplict
    @mxilplict 2 года назад +2

    Haha - no love for Fuji here! As for the 28-70, I absolutely love mine and mostly leave my other RF L primes and zooms behind in its favor. The only minor gripe I have is the CA and fringing on the edges at 2.0 against high contrast backgrounds. This is fair and expected, and I only list it because it is the only imperfection that I can see when using it over my other RF L primes and zooms. Otherwise this lens is what moved me to RF mount after 20 years on EF mount, and will probably keep me there until something surpasses it. Also like you, I still keep a few special EF lenses around, which for me are the 135/2 and 11-24.

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад

      hahah only love for Fuji mountain 🤣 Regarding the CA and fringing I agree few times it was strong, but still better than the old L glass I use, I don't have the RF versions of 50 1.2 and 85 1.2 to compare but I presume they are superior regarding image quality. Thanks for watching!

    • @whiterock1865
      @whiterock1865 Год назад

      @@TomislavMoze Yes, the 85mm is practically flawless with no visible CA etc compared to the 28-70. I'm always going back and forth between primes and this lens. While tests have show it isn't as sharp as the sharpest RF primes, its sharper than pretty much all EF, so most peeps don't take the same photo at the same time with different lenses and then compare them side by side...the 28-70 is phenomenal and so much more convenient...and that convenience often gets the shot that you wouldn't be able to with the prime.

  • @Manueldeva
    @Manueldeva Год назад +1

    Muchas gracias

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  Год назад

      Gracias por ver el video, espero que les haya gustado y que disfruten del canal completo

  • @patrikmarcan
    @patrikmarcan 2 года назад +1

    One video a week, LESSSS GOOOO! 😊😊

  • @celaldoor
    @celaldoor 2 года назад +1

    Thx so much

  • @tonilugarov
    @tonilugarov 2 года назад +1

    Nice video :)

  • @nikolaskala
    @nikolaskala 2 года назад +1

    Please some behind the scene on the shoot!

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад

      I will try, does are always hard to do since Im more focused on the client and the project 😅

  • @rolandrickphotography
    @rolandrickphotography Год назад +2

    Hey man, thanks for the review. Did you ever use it with a CPol filter for portrait? Wenn, 95mm CPol filters are pretty expensive. I don't have one yet (as well as I don't have the lens yet). I'm struggling between the RF 85 1.2 (the normal one) and the 28-70 2.0

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  Год назад +2

      Hey, thank you for watching! I only used it with variable ND filter for video. If my personal interest where classical portraits I would probably go for the 85, that is till one of the best focal lengths for portraits for sure and paired with 1.2 you cant miss. 28-70 is I would say more for versatile photography.

  • @unclejun4723
    @unclejun4723 2 года назад

    @Tomislave Moze what kind of monitor, monitor bracket and cable did you use at the time 6:32? Your simplicity is good.

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад

      Hey there, I've used a small rig cage, with a small rig ad on to hold the monitor. Monitor is athomos ninja V and their cable, if you really want to know I can look up exact names.
      Thanks for watching!

  • @fatma3238
    @fatma3238 Год назад +1

    I just got this lens. Wow, it's a brick (bulky and heavy) but I like it.

  • @HoldMyData
    @HoldMyData 2 года назад +1

    I might be lucky enough to get one tomorrow! @8:00 is so true too 😆 Kinda thinking it'll make people consider me, at the very least, serious about what I like to do.

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад +1

      Nice! You will definitely enjoy it 🥰

    • @HoldMyData
      @HoldMyData 2 года назад +1

      @@TomislavMoze I got it and OMG ITS SO BIG!!! LOLOL

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад

      @@HoldMyData hahaha 😁😁😁

  • @yvon1961
    @yvon1961 13 дней назад

    Zivio Tomislave, jako lijepo. Sad i na hrvatskom😂

  • @judebraimoh678
    @judebraimoh678 Год назад +1

    First thing first great pictures and thanks for sharing. But logging that lens for 6-8 hrs of wedding events hmmm not for me. What's the point of having a small form factor of a mirrorless body?

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  Год назад

      Hey there thank you! Regarding mirrorless size, I think canon got the. small size factor right.It is smaller but not to small, while sonny went for the smallest possible. Now some lenses are smaller with the mirrorless system, usually the telephoto ones. Regarding the 28-70 in my case when I use it I dont need a second camera I usually worked with two cameras on the wedding one with 24mm1.4 the other 50mm 1.2 plus one or two lenses in a small pouch on my waist usually 85 and 35mm. With this lens I can do everything with. one, camera maybe two lenses this one and 16mm /2.8 if the event needs a lot of wide shots. But I also think this mainly depends on your shooting style. I'm also a big guy so for me it is less of a hustle.

  • @kore996
    @kore996 2 года назад +1

    How do you think this will hold up without lens IS but IBIS only? Basically for family videos and photos, both indoor and outdoor. I’m currently using an EF 24-70 F4 version and looking to get more light. I tried the RF 2.8 version and while it was better in a lot of ways than my EF it was hard to justify the cost and hoping the 28-70 F2 would be a much bigger difference. I also use the 50mm F1.8 and that seems to give me enough light in darker home environments so I’m assuming the 28-70 will be drastically better than that. Thanks in advance for any opinions.

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад

      It is hard to be objective regarding stabilisation since every person has a different style of shooting photos and video and that dictates the need for better stabilisation. For me it works I do have RF 24-105 4L is and compare to it especially zoomed you can feel the difference regarding shake compensation but still I chose to use always 28-70 2.0 although it doesn't have the IS it has 2 stopes more of light so at the end it ends up close since you can have faster shutter with it.
      Hope it was helpfull and thanx for watching !

    • @THENSHOTYA
      @THENSHOTYA 2 года назад

      You still get the full 8stops of stabilization like you would in the 24-70 rf the technology behind it along with rf allows it to achieve those results even though it doesn’t have is. As long as you got the R5/R6 the ibis gives you 8 stops rather than 5 stops and this is said my canon themselves. This was one of the reasons I’m going for this lens

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад +1

      @@THENSHOTYA yeah I saw that on Canon official channels but I don't know, it still feels like I'm getting better results with ibis+in lens is.

    • @THENSHOTYA
      @THENSHOTYA 2 года назад

      @@TomislavMoze there’s a couple of videos showing the lens in action and it’s very smooth and imagine if you use digital is

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад

      @@THENSHOTYA well I've been using it for more than a year so no need to imagine things regarding that 😅 if I need a more stable footage and the light conditions allow it I always go for the 24-105 4L cause it offered better results regarding that 😁

  • @DCAMM720
    @DCAMM720 Год назад +2

    Recently purchased the 50 1.2 RF version and while it's incredible, I'm wondering if the 28-70 would suffice for my portrait needs and have the zoom versatility. I wish it wasn't like $500 to rent one for a week so I could test it.

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  Год назад +2

      Hey thank you for watching!
      I do own the EF 50 and now rarely use it. Definitely prefer the 28-70 to it for portraits.

    • @DCAMM720
      @DCAMM720 Год назад +3

      @@TomislavMoze Well now I have another big purchase to think about lol

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  Год назад +1

      @@DCAMM720 😂

  • @Mr.Zen_73
    @Mr.Zen_73 2 года назад +1

    nice video! I'm thinking of buying this lens for the Canon R5C to do a combo of video and photo. How have you found it with video?

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад

      Hey there!
      When I shoot video it is my first choice, I rarely need wide angle lens so 28-70 is perfect range for most video situations at least for me, the problem for R5c could be the lack of IS, i did miss it a bit when shooting raw on C70. I like the size of it for the video, camera being heavier with it makes all the movement much more pleasant.
      thank you for watching! Hope it was helpfull

    • @Mr.Zen_73
      @Mr.Zen_73 2 года назад

      @@TomislavMoze Cool thanks for the info! I just bought it this afternoon :-) I'll be using it with gimbal with the R5C so it should work really well. Can't wait to get my hands on it

    •  2 года назад +1

      @@TomislavMoze Nice to hear. I'm a student and I could afford the lens, but not two RF lenses (right now). I do filming and photography, but my focus is filming as of right now. I was thinking of getting this, as I mostly film pretty improvised when travelling in urban environments. So changing lenses and carrying many of them is annoying. I thought maybe this lens is good for me, as I can save me money if i use it as my only lens instead of primes, save me time and weight on run and gun shoots in cities. Also I film at night often...
      Im using the R6, which I love.
      Do you think it's a good idea? I'm not sure if 28mm is wide enough for filming 🤔 But considering many great directors used similar focal lengths when you convert it from Super 35 to Full frame equivalent?
      It's probably overkill for a student...
      What do you think? Would love to hear from you, saw you even have a BA in Cinematography!

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад +1

      @ Hey, first thnx for watching!
      I use the 28-70 mostly when I film on r6 or r5 I think for normal cinematography it is really unusual to go wider than 28mm. basically wider lenses became popular mostly cause of youtube. I guess it depends mostly on what you like. Option is to take also rf 16mm 2.8 that is not that expensive and u can use it for extra wide shots and with 4k cropped mode as a 24mm lens. A friend of mine is doing great content with the r6 and 24-105 so maybe think about that one.
      Although anybody that tries 28-70 2.0 for video instantly fells in love into the lens :D

    •  2 года назад

      @@TomislavMoze Thanks a lot!! So helpful!

  • @1740canon
    @1740canon Год назад +1

    看来在哪里都是一样,客户都认为镜头越大越好!! :)

  • @robmcd
    @robmcd 2 года назад +1

    I have a solid RF line up with R5. Often I’ll just take my Fuji XT4 and a 23 or 33.

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад +1

      Glad to hear that, I was joking about fuji , they are solid cameras, but I just personally never liked shooting with them, I just don't like the whole retro ergonomics...hope you liked the video?

    • @robmcd
      @robmcd 2 года назад +1

      @@TomislavMoze it was a great video!

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад

      @@robmcd thank you ☺️

  • @5hamo
    @5hamo Год назад

    How would this lerns go on a canon r7?

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  Год назад

      well I think it will be optically great, the only problem is that it really big and R7 is rather small body so ergonomically they will not be a perfect match.

  • @hamzehzare9972
    @hamzehzare9972 Год назад +1

    Hi Tomislav, I was just wording if you can help me with color grading for video, if you do that types of works please let me know and we can agree on the price

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  Год назад +1

      Hey there I’m sorry I don’t do that, there are so many channels with tutorials I don’t see a point. ☺️

    • @hamzehzare9972
      @hamzehzare9972 Год назад

      @@TomislavMoze Thanks for your response

  • @jianqiangzhangchina1007
    @jianqiangzhangchina1007 2 года назад

    Is it perfect to shoot video with only this single lense? I will shoot some video and pictures at gym and yoga studio. Other documentary videographer suggest 24mm + 50mm prime lenses. I hesitate now.

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад

      I use it in 90% of my work. Primes are great but for more dynamic situations 28-70 is much better. ☺️

    • @jianqiangzhangchina1007
      @jianqiangzhangchina1007 2 года назад

      @@TomislavMoze thanks for your reply

  • @StephanBednaic
    @StephanBednaic 2 года назад +4

    Actually, he doesn’t have a lot of equipment! Trust me bro!

    • @TomislavMoze
      @TomislavMoze  2 года назад

      hahahah :D :D

    • @vueport99
      @vueport99 11 месяцев назад

      Having lots of equipment or even best equipment doesn't make you good for anything

  • @CZOV
    @CZOV Год назад +1

    Except Fuji, lol, racist :)