Why Logarithms Appear in This Integral

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 сен 2024
  • Before the days of Calculus, one Pierre de Fermat wanted to find the area under the function f(x)=x^n. This problem we now call "integration" was then called "quadrature" or "squaring". Fermat was able to square every function f(x)=x^n for any rational n except for one case: n=-1 (that is, the hyperbola). It turns out that this unique nature of the hyperbola was tied to logarithms and Euler's number e. But why? Why does the area under the hyperbola have anything to do with logarithms or e?
    Other resources
    e: The Story of a Number by Eli Maor
    www.amazon.com...
    Images
    upload.wikimed...
    Music
    patriciataxxon...
    Starboard by Patricia Taxxon

Комментарии • 12

  • @jHan
    @jHan  Год назад +11

    Mistake at 7:17: log(1)=0, log(10)=1, log(100)=2, log(1000)=3

  • @mohammedbelgoumri
    @mohammedbelgoumri Год назад +14

    In his video on exponentials and logarithms, Grant from @3b1b asks if anyone knows of a beautiful geometric interpretation of logs. Here it is.

  • @Zosso-1618
    @Zosso-1618 10 месяцев назад +2

    This is amazing! I remember reading various proofs that the function describing the area under a hyperbola has logarithmic properties. But in one sentence, you made that connection deeper than my reading did! Bravo!

  • @guillaume5313
    @guillaume5313 Год назад +4

    Great content as always !

  • @TheMemesofDestruction
    @TheMemesofDestruction Год назад

    Fantastic decomposition!

  • @DavyCDiamondback
    @DavyCDiamondback Год назад

    Really, it's ln(|x|)+C, coincidentally, no matter what C you choose, if this function intercepts y=x^2, it intercepts perpendicularly

  • @matiasvergara5069
    @matiasvergara5069 Год назад

    Very nice video jHan!

  • @Avighna
    @Avighna Год назад +1

    The video is amazing, but the title isn't as great as it could be. Something like "How Descartes discovered the power rule without calculus" might be better, anyway amazing job man!

    • @davidwright8432
      @davidwright8432 11 месяцев назад

      True, but that drags Descartes into it, and in terms of this explanation, he's irrelevant. Interesting guy, tho!

    • @Zosso-1618
      @Zosso-1618 10 месяцев назад +1

      Did you watch the video? Descartes isn’t mentioned once, that was Fermat. And most of the video is about the area under the hyperbola, not the power rule.

  • @eduardoguimaraes5226
    @eduardoguimaraes5226 11 месяцев назад

    Do you use manim?