A380 refueling test at FRA

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 ноя 2006
  • The FRA airport check was conducted on the 29th October 2005.
    The aircraft used was MSN4, a development aircraft in the flight test programme which is not equipped with a cabin.
    Full equipment positioning, several ramp scenarios tested.
  • ХоббиХобби

Комментарии • 280

  • @PragueImport
    @PragueImport Год назад +10

    I have flown in A380 at least 20 times between the US and the EU. I still cannot understand how this enormous beauty can take off and fly.

  • @harryartstudio8027
    @harryartstudio8027 4 года назад

    Nice video this is my first time to see how they refuel the large aeroplanes

    • @flat-earther
      @flat-earther 3 года назад

      Yeah it's very interesting. I courage you to see this, it is awesome..
      ruclips.net/video/HfsHqa3_LhE/видео.html
      ruclips.net/video/YXRmcumPL3k/видео.html

  • @VGWKI
    @VGWKI 3 года назад

    Great video

  • @harold562
    @harold562 14 лет назад +8

    @stewardlie its just like refuiling your car, the fuel tanks are under ground, there are machines that will emit a certain pressure so that the fuel rises.

  • @BlakeBigfoot
    @BlakeBigfoot 11 лет назад +2

    When I do the 47s, our trucks usually do at least 700-730, something like that, and another style of truck we have does a little more than that.

  • @stevegriffiths5364
    @stevegriffiths5364 3 года назад +5

    Never seen such a clean refueler lol

    • @ATLMike94
      @ATLMike94 Год назад +3

      Only for the video lol

  • @Leonhadrt
    @Leonhadrt 6 лет назад +12

    A380: "Ok guys, give me a shot, i'm very thisrty. Thanks".

    • @PragueImport
      @PragueImport Год назад +2

      I have got another 10,000 miles ahead of me.

  • @chubbybrown4real
    @chubbybrown4real 14 лет назад +1

    Were they sight glasses on the Carters?
    I take it they dont need PCV's as its on a hydrant system?
    Do you earth off or does the Hydrant pit valve act as the Earth.
    surprised to see plastic caps on the Plane too.

  • @saifeddine879
    @saifeddine879 5 лет назад

    Good job

  • @dealviinde
    @dealviinde 11 лет назад +1

    What would be the correct Way?

  • @simpsonstewie
    @simpsonstewie 16 лет назад

    right on!

  • @freddymusumari241
    @freddymusumari241 2 года назад

    Bonjour, j'aimerais savoir pourquoi l'avitailleur à installer le flexible hydrant devant l'oleoserveur et en cas de problème va t-il évacuer ce dernier.

  • @christianbenn316
    @christianbenn316 Год назад

    I lovd these kind of jobs

  • @37683769
    @37683769 10 лет назад

    It was before the regulation for glases, ear protect your right but this was a test so it could be on the south side
    there you dont need ear protect out of normal fueling
    today they want you to wear both, I knew it because I was there much times

  • @beneditoaraujo6386
    @beneditoaraujo6386 4 года назад +1

    Epa curto muito estes trabalho sobre avioens

  • @dunlrock
    @dunlrock 14 лет назад +4

    holy fucking shit, that plane is HUGE!!!!!!

  • @tankfarm2840
    @tankfarm2840 3 года назад +1

    After the Dispenser is parked at designated place and the safety cone is placed, Is it not mandatory to attach the bonding clip first before connecting the deck hose to aircraft?

    • @MorgMorgW
      @MorgMorgW 2 года назад

      It is, but they probably cut that part out of the video.

  • @Hopeless_and_Forlorn
    @Hopeless_and_Forlorn 6 лет назад +9

    Maximum fuel capacity 320, 000 liters. Since it costs fuel to carry fuel, only enough fuel to complete the flight, including alternate airport and reserves, of course, will be loaded for a given flight. On some aircraft types, loading maximum fuel for a long range flight may severely limit the payload that can be carried, because of weight and performance limitations. As far as the pilots wishes go, most of them are firm believers that the only time you have too much fuel on board is when you are on fire.

    • @EdOeuna
      @EdOeuna 5 лет назад

      Hopelessand Forlorn - people mistake operating an aeroplane to operating a car. I don’t think I have ever filled up fuel tanks FULL for a flight since I was at flight school.

    • @holdshortrunway27
      @holdshortrunway27 5 лет назад

      Hopelessand Forlorn
      Great n accurate comment.
      You really know your stuff.

    • @99.9percent9
      @99.9percent9 Год назад

      320,000 litres of jet 'a'
      0.8kg per litre
      320,000 litres x 0.8kg = 256,000kg
      256 tonnes of fuel + passengers + crew + luggage + aircraft...
      I can see a problem here, can you???

  • @Richard14389
    @Richard14389 12 лет назад +2

    Fastest that I have seen is 600 gallons pre minute or 2270 litres pre minute. but that is just is system and equip,ent that we use here. All depends on tank fuel pumps, the amount of piping between the outlet and the pump, also the equipment that is hooked up to the outlet and some others that I cant think of right now.

  • @davidsmiths5471
    @davidsmiths5471 Год назад

    When did they bond to the A/C??

  • @ammaralbary1218
    @ammaralbary1218 4 года назад

    Awsome

  • @Kaloxri
    @Kaloxri 14 лет назад

    How does an apartment at the 5th floor of a bulding have water? :PpP

  • @ForLyes
    @ForLyes 13 лет назад +1

    I wonder how fast of the refueling speed? how many gallons per minute or a second?

  • @Richard14389
    @Richard14389 12 лет назад

    Is jet fuel up that much I thought it was round $5.00 to $5.50.

  • @andrewrixon2347
    @andrewrixon2347 5 лет назад +2

    Seeing Rolls Royce on the engines is like seeing Sterling on Silver

    • @samiudsan1742
      @samiudsan1742 2 года назад

      yep but you have tu get closer to see it

  • @jeanpaulkerebel7194
    @jeanpaulkerebel7194 6 лет назад

    Bonjour, je voudrais pouvoir retrouver l hôtesse qui se lâche d une facon sympathique à l atterrissage à Toulouse .. ??

  • @37683769
    @37683769 10 лет назад +2

    I saw 3600 l/min at two vehicles until the small tanks get close ;)
    but this is the monitor limit

  • @Luckydog66100
    @Luckydog66100 13 лет назад +2

    We refuel with max. 3200 liters per minute. We have seperate earth cables that are fixed to the ground on the landing gear closest to us. The tanks in FRA are not underground. Only the supply system is underground to every position. Our dispensers are basically filtering and reducing the flow speed of the fuel from about 10 bar (145psi) to max. 3,5 bar (50psi).

    • @jordanblake574
      @jordanblake574 Год назад +2

      Lol 3200liters per minute😂 that's way more than and fire hose

    • @ed3ncove
      @ed3ncove 7 месяцев назад +1

      Not possible 😂😂😂 more lies

  • @imdaman786
    @imdaman786 12 лет назад +3

    @XxTrooKxX ensha allah I'll also be finished by then but not as a refuelling operator..but as an Aircraft Engineer..can't wait to sign off one of these babes...goin to Emirates or tayaran al emarat lol

  • @mountainman1977
    @mountainman1977 16 лет назад

    I wanna see 800 people in your Ford Explorer :-)

  • @cdimmm
    @cdimmm 6 лет назад +3

    no safety glasses or fire extinguishers, no hazmat placards?

    • @freestylmx311
      @freestylmx311 5 лет назад +1

      Its because the jet fuel hoax is real and these guys arent pumping any fuel into this plane

    • @annoyingbstard9407
      @annoyingbstard9407 5 лет назад +1

      mojo jojo A real hoax. There's a novelty.

    • @ronshekelson
      @ronshekelson 4 года назад

      No need for safety equipment when you're faking it. . Look how clean the hoses are!!! They've NEVER had a drop a fuel on them. FAKE AF

  • @user-xd6fm1rs3t
    @user-xd6fm1rs3t 8 лет назад

    حلو اموت على الطيارات

  • @SNIPERRECON88
    @SNIPERRECON88 12 лет назад +8

    i have yet to do a refill on the a380, but my coworker did, said it took just 40 minutes of refueling (plus his set up and take down time)

    • @TyphoonJetPilotMeteb
      @TyphoonJetPilotMeteb 6 лет назад +2

      Federico Cigliutti 40 minuets with 4 connected hoses ( 2’’)

    • @bobwill
      @bobwill 6 лет назад +3

      Philippe, so, when you do the math, take 4 hoses each hose carries 21250 gallons. Spread that over 40 minutes, that's 531.25 gallons per minute. That's 8.85 gallons per second. That's 1.184 cubic feet per second.
      A 2" diameter hose would have an internal area of 3.14" That means, that the pumper only needs to move any unit of fuel through the line by 4" in 1 second to do its job.
      Seems possible to me.

    • @trutharmy6517
      @trutharmy6517 5 лет назад +1

      Robert Williams You're such a silly easy to fool fucking moron man

    • @trutharmy6517
      @trutharmy6517 5 лет назад +1

      Robert Williams brainless fucks like you are holy trails to corporations

  • @titurevvlog
    @titurevvlog 5 лет назад

    😍

  • @djhostile505
    @djhostile505 6 лет назад +1

    No eye protection?

  • @musicISlyf1
    @musicISlyf1 14 лет назад +1

    pressure

  • @marceloaraujo6816
    @marceloaraujo6816 9 лет назад +1

    Show! !!!

  • @XxTrooKxX
    @XxTrooKxX 13 лет назад +10

    ensha'allah it's my job after 1 year ahead.
    aircraft fuel operator in SaudiAramco

    • @Abuahmed770
      @Abuahmed770 4 года назад

      XxTrooKxX وش صار على موضوع ارامكو

  • @TetovoBoy
    @TetovoBoy 15 лет назад +1

    by pumping it from the underground tanks.....

  • @SonChadio
    @SonChadio 14 лет назад

    NIce equipment! I worked for a fueling company with shitty trucks ... THose planes are easy, all you do is hook up and set the gauges and they fuel themselves

  • @fuelman777
    @fuelman777 16 лет назад +6

    Mike, I used to refuel Concord at LHR twice a day...that took apx 100 metric tonn to fly to JFK and a Cathy 747/400 to HGK .....168 metric tonn...thats 168,000 kg, and with the SG at .8 that's 1250 ltrs to the metric ton.
    fuelman777

  • @vstasov12
    @vstasov12 6 лет назад

    Мощно, брутально, красиво - это я про самолет! 👍👍👍✌✌✌✌✈✈✈

  • @jmister22
    @jmister22 14 лет назад +5

    The wings are big enough to put a roof over the heads of about 8000 hungry homeless

  • @user-to7hq7er9w
    @user-to7hq7er9w 5 месяцев назад

    Oh my God, I guess the fueling things are heavy

  • @TonyAirlines
    @TonyAirlines 12 лет назад +1

    It's probably around that now, when I made that comment a year ago, it was up.

  • @felixarcesiorondonramirez8739
    @felixarcesiorondonramirez8739 5 лет назад

    Todos los días pasa y hace explotar las turbinas

  • @TheClippa1
    @TheClippa1 4 года назад +3

    Where to start here. Fueling above your head, no drips when removing caps, Pipe gets smaller the nearer the plane. No way all that fuel goes in a wing of a plane.

    • @DC8Combi
      @DC8Combi 4 года назад +1

      TheClippa1 start with using common sense and doing some research. Every childish question you make has an educated answer.
      Fueling above your head - The fuel port is under the wing, are they supposed to lug fuel hoses on top of a wing and fuel from the top? It's called common sense no potential damage to aircraft.
      No drips - Because we have engineered valves and fittings for safety. And maybe if you watched enough fuelings you'd see a drip or two.
      Pipe gets smaller near aircraft - WTF are you on about, the fuel hose can only be the fuel receptacles size.
      Did you go to school?

    • @94dbaby
      @94dbaby 4 года назад +1

      DC8Combi calm down man... He just asked a simple question. You’re typing as if you have G string up your ass!

    • @DC8Combi
      @DC8Combi 3 года назад +1

      @@aurevoirugootubee3927 get real you idiot, anyone with a brain cell knows aircraft use fuel. Lets here how a turbine runs without fuel dumb ass.

    • @DC8Combi
      @DC8Combi 3 года назад

      @@aurevoirugootubee3927 my about page reveals the truth and that's I'm an aircraft mechanic, something you could never do.

    • @DC8Combi
      @DC8Combi 3 года назад

      @@aurevoirugootubee3927 called me out, really cupcake 😝. You must be one of them sky muffins from US Air 😝.

  • @williamlobur6181
    @williamlobur6181 4 года назад

    how many gallons for a complete fillup

  • @josepaivapaiva9963
    @josepaivapaiva9963 4 года назад

    Muito bonito vou da Aír fra

  • @monkeyboy5625
    @monkeyboy5625 12 лет назад

    its not like going to a garage

  • @fifelad
    @fifelad 16 лет назад

    I think you will find for some reason its fairly poor pay in the USA for some reason. In the UK its pretty good in my opinion I earn £27400 basic salary inc shift alowance.With overtime its about £32000.Nearly double that for Dollars?

  • @azeezkaereem9862
    @azeezkaereem9862 8 лет назад +2

    الطائرات عالم جميل.

  • @wanjithawithanage7804
    @wanjithawithanage7804 8 лет назад +2

    how much do they get paid?

    • @PhillyMotoXTS
      @PhillyMotoXTS 6 лет назад +1

      The actual people hooking the hoses up and refueling the plane? Not a whole lot. I did it for 4 years at both a small and large (international) airport. In 2006 I was making around than $30K USD. On the other side of it, I absolutely loved it and missed being outside (except in the dead of winter/summer) and by the end I was fueling a B777 and B747 everyday as pretty much my only flights since we still used 10,000 gallon tanker trucks instead of the hydrant system shown in this video.

  • @drfiberglass
    @drfiberglass 4 года назад

    Will that be cash or credit...

  • @occhiverdi1754
    @occhiverdi1754 4 года назад

    Ma la massa a terra non la Collegno e la prova del acqua non la fanno?

  • @jatetsu
    @jatetsu 9 лет назад +2

    Once you have this work, in Japan there is no work

  • @markpackwood7763
    @markpackwood7763 10 лет назад +11

    on a health and safety note shouldn't he be wearing goggles (fuel) and hard hat (working at height)

    • @Zone5Aviation
      @Zone5Aviation 9 лет назад

      and should also be wearing a harness with a fall arrest system with lanyard clipped onto the rail of the lifting platform. Anything over 3 metres requires a harness. Safety goggles/glasses yes. If you look around at fuelers at airports they may not appear to be wearing goggles but may be wearing conforming safety glasses or sunglasses as aircraft aprons are usually quite bright as well as the aircraft themselves. But you're right, they should be wearing some form of eye protection. Not so sure about the hard hat though as there is little or no risk of anything swinging or falling as the aircraft wing is static and the fuel nozzle is barely above head height.

    • @ikarlhd1
      @ikarlhd1 8 лет назад

      Our fuelers wear bump caps and glasses if that makes you feel any better..

    • @moralizade
      @moralizade 6 лет назад +5

      You are right. Obviously this is not liquid fuel they are filling. Don't the jet airplanes have a pneumatic motor (air motor) or compressed air engine - a type of motor which does mechanical work by expanding compressed air?

    • @jjfakespace193
      @jjfakespace193 6 лет назад +5

      Exactly..there is no way in hell those wings are carrying 320.000 liters of fuel ..thats over 240,000 kg...240 tonnes of fuel !!! If you believe that then its good night sweetheart ..g.co/kgs/CNmnWs

    • @markusde
      @markusde 6 лет назад +2

      ahem...no! Do you have any idea of physics - how thick the walls of a compressed air tank need to be to operate this kind of turbine? For airplanes, it's all about the specific impulse of a certain fuel, that is, how much energy is stored in a kilogram of fuel. And you can never, ever get to interesting specific impulse with "compressed air". Do the math, and then make assumptions.

  • @justinmunoz7352
    @justinmunoz7352 4 года назад

    ¿2020?

  • @drfiberglass
    @drfiberglass 8 лет назад +4

    I wonder how much it would cost to fill one of those up..

    • @dbflyboy917
      @dbflyboy917 7 лет назад +6

      Well... according to my brief research, the A380 takes 84,500 US gallons of fuel. Using KLAX as the source of the fuel, and assuming the airlines are paying $7.88/gal, it would cost $665,860.00 in fuel.... I'm sure the airlines are getting some discount because of the volume of fuel purchased, but that's just based on some brief searching, and using numbers readily available on the internet.... In other words, it costs a LOT of money to fill up these jumbo jets!!

    • @drfiberglass
      @drfiberglass 7 лет назад

      Thanks for the info. That would sure melt down your credit card..

    • @lelandbradford51
      @lelandbradford51 7 лет назад

      T H ya think Jesse I would be "hey mom got my first credit card" next day, "mom my credit card is gone spent all of it on fuel welp time for a new one"

    • @altturf
      @altturf 7 лет назад

      G

    • @dbflyboy917
      @dbflyboy917 7 лет назад

      Cool. Good to know. I'm jealous!!

  • @TonyAirlines
    @TonyAirlines 14 лет назад

    @kuyakev $6.30 times the number of gallons in that tank

    • @TRPGpilot
      @TRPGpilot 4 года назад

      Fuel is dispensed in Litres the world over, NOT gallons . . .

  • @iamadrenaline
    @iamadrenaline 16 лет назад +1

    Amazingly intricate fuel systems. I wonder how much ground time is required to refuel the entire plane empty.
    That really needs superb ground crew eh?
    Cheers to the Ground Crews!

    • @luccafrancis4227
      @luccafrancis4227 2 года назад

      I guess im asking the wrong place but does someone know a method to log back into an instagram account?
      I stupidly forgot the login password. I would love any help you can give me.

    • @lorenzoisrael6619
      @lorenzoisrael6619 2 года назад

      @Lucca Francis Instablaster ;)

    • @luccafrancis4227
      @luccafrancis4227 2 года назад

      @Lorenzo Israel thanks so much for your reply. I got to the site on google and Im trying it out now.
      Looks like it's gonna take quite some time so I will reply here later when my account password hopefully is recovered.

    • @luccafrancis4227
      @luccafrancis4227 2 года назад

      @Lorenzo Israel It worked and I actually got access to my account again. I am so happy:D
      Thank you so much you really help me out!

    • @lorenzoisrael6619
      @lorenzoisrael6619 2 года назад

      @Lucca Francis glad I could help =)

  • @fredretteketet
    @fredretteketet 6 лет назад +1

    No fuel, but compressed air!

  • @georgka74
    @georgka74 5 лет назад

    Pumping liquid in a loop , thats why there are two nosels

    • @PabloGonzalez-hv3td
      @PabloGonzalez-hv3td 5 лет назад

      I thought it was chemicals for the chemtrails or compressed air? 🤔

  • @antiscientism3665
    @antiscientism3665 6 лет назад +1

    Fuel here means compressed air, that’s it

    • @PabloGonzalez-hv3td
      @PabloGonzalez-hv3td 5 лет назад

      So is it chemicals for chemtrails, compressed air tanks or just enough jet fuel for the engines to generate their own compressed air you guys can't seem to agree on a theory

  • @user-mt3mz7zk3c
    @user-mt3mz7zk3c 5 лет назад

    OK

  • @stevesmith2256
    @stevesmith2256 6 лет назад +9

    No doubt looks like all acting to me.
    A-380 single wing with 118 tonnes of fuel in it but the 6 meter flex from pressure from the turbulence wont tear it off.
    If you be-lie ve that then you still
    think santa exists.

    • @floydhorn3750
      @floydhorn3750 6 лет назад +4

      It is liquid fuel and some of the tanks are also in the body of the aircraft. I have been flying as a pilot for 62 years and I tell you folks who think we use compressed air and not fuel to power aircraft are how shall I say iyt NUTS.

    • @allanstewart5682
      @allanstewart5682 5 лет назад

      .

    • @oliversundstrom1806
      @oliversundstrom1806 5 лет назад

      @@floydhorn3750 Are pilots often up climbing in the tanks?

  • @fredretteketet
    @fredretteketet 6 лет назад +6

    Hahaha compressed air! We have been fooled for many many years!

  • @danielserrano591
    @danielserrano591 4 года назад

    wing commander

  • @alfredwilliam1184
    @alfredwilliam1184 6 лет назад +5

    81,890, eighty one thousand eight hundred and ninety gallons of kerosene, central heating oil call it what you like, and they blame the motorist for polluting the atmosphere, you could not make it up, the only good thing is oil is not a fossil fuel, not a lot of people know that, it is abiogenic.

    • @dosun714
      @dosun714 6 лет назад

      alfred william so glad there are people who've done research here. Unlike Richard Jones 😂

    • @VesicABand
      @VesicABand 6 лет назад

      I knew that they frack at 30 000 feet never found a fossil past 12 000 feet Rockefeller fooled everyone at the Geneva conference all those years ago, oil is the second most abundant liquid after water.

    • @VesicABand
      @VesicABand 6 лет назад

      thats 300 tonnes of fuel in those wings...sounds about right :S

    • @williamchamberlain2263
      @williamchamberlain2263 6 лет назад +1

      Still contains carbon, still creates CO2 in combustion, so unfortunately it'll still be warming the planet.

    • @alfredwilliam1184
      @alfredwilliam1184 6 лет назад

      Thank you for your e-m, co2 is a coolant, it does not cause warming, I used thousands of large cylinders of c02 gas for welding over 55 years, they now use c02 gas for cooling when cnc machining steel, when you go to hospital they give you 50 percent c02, 50 percent oxygen mix for recovery, look at the sahara desert the heat is unbearable, without co2 nothing would grow, aircraft burn so much fuel in the atmosphere it is out of control, here in the UK Heathrow airport in London would need 2,500 fuel tankers a day and then they would still need more. the body is made of carbon we breathe in and out co2.we pump up beer and lemonade with co2, the scientists claim the planet is greener now than it has ever been, we were going to run out of fuel 20 years ago the world is producing so much oil they do not know what to do with it because it is abiogenic old oil wells are filling up and they are re opening them, oil is is not a fossil fuel. sorry to go on but we are all being conned. thank you, kind regards, aw.

  • @discoverjamestown
    @discoverjamestown 5 лет назад +5

    This totally proves to me that there is no fuel that runs these jets it’s so obvious it’s ridiculous these guys are supposedly pumping ridiculous amount of fuel and they’re not even wearing safety glasses masks or anything not a drop of fuel anywhere. Lets face it, these things compress air to the point where they can ignite it as fuel. Thank you for your demonstration.

    • @LS-to6el
      @LS-to6el 5 лет назад +1

      Zachary Imus
      And earth is flat

    • @kadirkalnas
      @kadirkalnas 2 года назад

      @@LS-to6el no, earth is a ball shape.

    • @leonmacri2910
      @leonmacri2910 2 года назад +1

      Correct. And yes, earth is flat, no way spinning ball.

    • @mathieuidir2886
      @mathieuidir2886 2 года назад

      100% right

    • @OlogynyOfficial
      @OlogynyOfficial Год назад +3

      I hope this is a joke

  • @harold562
    @harold562 14 лет назад

    @-@ wish i could afford one of these babes, they are huge, would of like..... go anywhere i could with a full first class plane

  • @sutrissutris6497
    @sutrissutris6497 5 лет назад +1

    Ghunter kapan saya bisa terbang bersama kamu Gratis

  • @danielserrano591
    @danielserrano591 4 года назад

    combustible airplane sig nl

  • @jonessenoj6753
    @jonessenoj6753 2 года назад +2

    🤣...what pressure and litres per minute does that go in at ? And the hoses never move??????

  • @hugoreyez4447
    @hugoreyez4447 6 лет назад

    q vivan los Boeing 747 la Reyna d los cielos

  • @JohnSmith-mz3ny
    @JohnSmith-mz3ny 4 года назад

    tut tut..no goggles?

  • @JJ-dz3xj
    @JJ-dz3xj 5 лет назад

    i guess im the only one in chat that believes airplanes use fuel

  • @terencedempsey151
    @terencedempsey151 4 года назад +1

    Supposed to be 118 metric tonnes of liquid fuel in the wings each wing HAHAHAHA

    • @flat-earther
      @flat-earther 3 года назад

      Yeah no way

    • @garygolfer3243
      @garygolfer3243 3 года назад

      When you walk up to an aircraft this size you'll understand how it fits and how easily it can lift the weight. Only those people who have never explored commercial aircraft up close are the ones who claim some sort of jet fuel hoax. No jet fuel conspiracy RUclipsr has ever investigated their claim in real life or provided any tangible evidence. Sorry, but jet fuel wins every time.

    • @flat-earther
      @flat-earther 3 года назад

      @@garygolfer3243 This is a good one ruclips.net/video/c8X_ydEH3_w/видео.html

    • @garygolfer3243
      @garygolfer3243 3 года назад

      Perinne Oh yeah, I remember that video. It proves my point, thanks.

  • @stewardlie
    @stewardlie 15 лет назад +1

    how could the fuelgo up?it is against the gravity..

    • @WN_Byers
      @WN_Byers 6 лет назад

      I do believe we are not being told the truth about planes, but to answer your question, the same way we are able to have water in high rise buildings

    • @WN_Byers
      @WN_Byers 6 лет назад

      +K. Ridge 1 the same way plants drink

    • @kimmer6
      @kimmer6 6 лет назад

      kaseyjosh, as a retired GE gas turbine engineer, I can honestly say you are full of shit. I have changed countless fuel nozzles in gas turbines, know control systems and fuel systems thoroughly. I am guessing you are a millennial who took gender studies in college.

    • @FSLTL
      @FSLTL 6 лет назад

      kimmer6, it's always about the imbeciles with no knowledge whatsoever that make up these conspiracies. They always find a new one because they are sickly paranoid. Think of al the engineers and mechanics who all are pretending jet engines run on fuel. You must have been paid a lot to keep silent. Something like this would leak out very fast if it was true, just like most other conspiracies (flat earth etc.). Aside from that, think about the childish idea compressed air can make a A380 fly for 15000 kms.... LOL

  • @danielserrano591
    @danielserrano591 4 года назад

    scru 2

  • @user-lh1xo5ci1k
    @user-lh1xo5ci1k 2 года назад

    แนว..อานีต.สึนยาน..โปรแกรม.สันยาย.ภาคพืน..สนาม...หอสื่อสาร....

  • @annoyingbstard9407
    @annoyingbstard9407 5 лет назад

    Reading some of these comments it looks like the lunatics have got hold of the keys to the Internet.

    • @LS-to6el
      @LS-to6el 5 лет назад

      Annoying B'stard
      And earth is flat

  • @user-zc4db7cz7q
    @user-zc4db7cz7q 5 месяцев назад

    นิคิกร.ภาษา.ศัพท์.บอยคอด.)ภาษา.คอมพืสเตอร์..

  • @Gabrielr8
    @Gabrielr8 3 года назад

    This is sad. Soon all these A380s would become history since airlines don't like 4 engine aircraft. What a waste. The A380 was an engineering marvel but I'll probably never work on it/get to travel in it.

  • @ed3ncove
    @ed3ncove 7 месяцев назад

    The counter shows only 50 kg 😂

  • @MuhammadAkram-uu4qv
    @MuhammadAkram-uu4qv 5 лет назад

    .

  • @user-zc4db7cz7q
    @user-zc4db7cz7q 7 месяцев назад

    อรตา.3.เท่า.

  • @leossafddjhth
    @leossafddjhth 16 лет назад

    hahaha congatulation

  • @winterwind7933
    @winterwind7933 4 года назад

    şu avrupalıların sosyal yaşam tarzından başka birşey alamadık mesela bilim biri gelsin şu bilim olayını bizim kalın kafamıza soksunlar lütfen yalvarıyoruz

  • @meenasrinivasan9082
    @meenasrinivasan9082 6 лет назад

    J

  • @jac.stasse1288
    @jac.stasse1288 6 лет назад +8

    No need too where goggles,the fuel is air, compressed air.

    • @kimmer6
      @kimmer6 6 лет назад +1

      Bullshit. Those hoses are for handling liquid fuel. There is a sight glass in each nozzle. Air equipment does not have sight glasses like this. If you are one of those people who try to claim that jet engines run on compressed air only, and don't require fuel, you are hugely mistaken.

    • @floydhorn3750
      @floydhorn3750 6 лет назад

      What generates all of the compressed air it would take to fly hours and hours of flight?

    • @kimmer6
      @kimmer6 6 лет назад +1

      floyd, They have a hose running to the Congress and Senate buildings. There is limitless hot air there.

  • @user-zc4db7cz7q
    @user-zc4db7cz7q 5 месяцев назад

    คลิลื่น.ลท..พายุ.งวงช้าง..คล้าย.ลทย้า.หมู..ลักษนะ...

  • @tommytomtime3345
    @tommytomtime3345 4 месяца назад

    The weight of 209 chevy camaros; .....believe this and i have a bridge to sell you. Wake up sheeple. 320,000 liters= 84,535 gallons=701,000 lbs=[3,354 lbs x 209] One chevy camero weights 3,354 lbs

  • @SWSimpson
    @SWSimpson 6 лет назад +5

    Conspiracy theory.... they don't have HUGE fuel trucks anymore so airplanes don't fly using fuel anymore... and they are only do 90 mph when they land... and the earth is flat. lol

  • @user-zc4db7cz7q
    @user-zc4db7cz7q 7 месяцев назад

    พท.หน่ายงาย.ฝ่าย
    ช่าง.ปอท...ปคม..

  • @stephen_crumley
    @stephen_crumley 6 лет назад

    I can't even fill up my piece of shit 2004 Silverado without a few drops spilling out of the nozzle, these fuckers put 900 trillion gallons of fuel in a plane, OVERHEAD and no drops whatsoever? No safety glasses or anything ? Wtf ?

  • @dosun714
    @dosun714 6 лет назад +23

    That's not fuel.. Its compressed air... Ever wondered why u can't smell fuel at an airport lol

    • @markusde
      @markusde 6 лет назад +9

      You can't smell fuel at an airport? In which world do you live? Have you ever done the math - compressed air is absolutely impossible. Why would they do that?

    • @VinnyTVTheRealVincent-P
      @VinnyTVTheRealVincent-P 6 лет назад +8

      i smell fuel all the time close to a airplane!! did you ever been next to a plane?? when we have parts to repair from planes we need to pick them up sometimes i tell you now the planes use fuel!! i suggest you ask for a tour 1 day where they repair planes!! hey and watch this and ask the people what they smell ruclips.net/video/FfYfFvqlJD0/видео.html
      peace

    • @markusde
      @markusde 6 лет назад +5

      kaseyjosh hmmm why do we even discuss about this? How can you guys not accept true facts - go to an airport and look into those fuel tanks for yourself. Have you done that? Because I did. Don’t make assumptions before you can prove them.

    • @VinnyTVTheRealVincent-P
      @VinnyTVTheRealVincent-P 6 лет назад +5

      you watch to much youtube vids about it!! i have been there so many times just stop the bs ... and stoP watching globebusters LOL GO TO A AIRPLANE REPAIR PLACE LIKE I SAID BEFORE !! AND THEN COME BACK !! CHEERS PEACE

    • @VinnyTVTheRealVincent-P
      @VinnyTVTheRealVincent-P 6 лет назад +1

      ruclips.net/video/RQjWOZ6bJmc/видео.html

  • @freestylmx311
    @freestylmx311 5 лет назад +3

    over 80,000 gal of fuel in those wings LOL YA RIGH!. How long would it take this truck to pump that much fuel? Think of all that weight, over 500,000 pounds. Half a million pounds of liquid sloshing around in those wings? Ya, I dont think so. Modern jet engines only need fuel for take off and climb. Once they are cruising they need nothing but compressed air and nitrogen. Wonder why modern commercial jets have nitrogen generators?? The jet fuel hoax is what keeps airliners profitable. Claiming it takes so much fuel in order to keep ticket prices so high.

    • @trutharmy6517
      @trutharmy6517 5 лет назад +1

      mojo jojo COULDENT HAVE SAID IT BETTR ✅

    • @trutharmy6517
      @trutharmy6517 5 лет назад +1

      mojo jojo ITS EASIER TO FOOL SOMEONE THAN TO CONVINCE THEM THEY HAVE BEEN FOOLED

    • @EdOeuna
      @EdOeuna 5 лет назад +2

      The 777 burns 8T per hour, every hour, except on descent when the engines are at idle thrust. They definitely burn fuel during the cruise.

    • @joshpeach4053
      @joshpeach4053 5 лет назад +1

      Well I guess my job of fueling airplanes all day is worthless then. Spoiler alert: it’s not. You guys are all idiots

    • @joshpeach4053
      @joshpeach4053 5 лет назад +1

      Those trucks usually pump around 600 to 900 GPM. They don’t need a tank because they hook up to an underground pipeline that is fed by the main airport fuel farm. And yeah, 500,000 lbs is a lot of weight but that’s also why there’s many different tanks on that plane. All those little screens you see on the upper part of that panel indicates a different tank. They act like baffles do inside of a tanker trailer that a semi truck pulls. The A380 has 5 tanks per wing plus a surge tank to handle expansion of the fuel during large temperature swings. They also have another tank in the horizontal stabilizer. Fuel is transferred back and forth between the wings and tail to keep the center of gravity where it needs to be for efficient flight. And no, engines don’t run on compressed air or nitrogen.

  • @user-lh1xo5ci1k
    @user-lh1xo5ci1k 2 года назад

    เครื่องยนต์.สันดาบ..ห้าม.อยู่.หลัง.เครื่องยนต์..แนว.ต้าน..คลื่น.ลม..แนว.ตัาน..เครื่องยนต์.ประมิทผธิภาห.สูง..หล้งเครื่องยนต์...จุด.สตราท์.รถ.ราก.เพลา.ยอย..กาบาท..พ่วง..ด้าน.หน้า.มุมล้อ..พลลา.บอย..ราก.แนว.ตลื่น.ลม..เครื่งยนต์.สึนดาบ..ไอ.เสีย..สันดาบ..มาตรา.วัตร.รพื้น..นิติ.วบุคคล..ประตํ.บันได.งิฟ..รภ.เปิด.ฝาท้าย..ลิฟ.สะพาน.บึนใด.ฝาม้าย..ประตู.เทียบ..ยันใด..รึ.พรอท์..ชม.งาน.แนวเส้น.ทึบ.ปี.คผศ..รุ่น..คศ...แนวเส้นทีบ...

  • @anthonymina8398
    @anthonymina8398 8 лет назад

    the new 747-8i is more fuel efficient than this.

    • @valerie80yearsago90
      @valerie80yearsago90 8 лет назад +1

      Look at when this was uploaded.

    • @FabsPro123
      @FabsPro123 8 лет назад +4

      +Anthony Mina Wow, a ten year newer plane is more efficient? WOAHHH

    • @man9170
      @man9170 7 лет назад +1

      no the a380 is more efficient than the 747-8 on a seat per km basis