Barlow Lens - Complete Overview and Function

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 мар 2019
  • This video is a complete overview of Barlow lenses and how they function, specifically looking at their various uses in telescopes. Barlow lenses can be very useful for lunar, planetary and solar viewing/imaging. There are many aspects to Barlow lenses and you will find them all discussed in this complete overview!
    Please consider making your astronomy purchases from my AgenaAstro affiliate link below. This helps me fund the channel and allows me to produce my tutorials and unbiased reviews that you can trust.
    bit.ly/3MiW5LL
    AFFILIATE LINKS:
    This description contains AgenaAstro affiliate links. If you choose to purchase after clicking a link, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps me significantly in funding the channel and astronomy purchases, allowing me to produce tutorials and unbiased reviews that you can trust. If you enjoyed the information presented and/or found it helpful, please support my channel by making your astronomy purchases through my AgenaAstro link above. Thank you!
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 197

  • @1stcomment700
    @1stcomment700 2 года назад +7

    I was a little hesitant to watch a whole 19 minute video but the way you explained it with so much detail made learning fun and enjoyable. I wish my college professors were more like you

  • @pummyy
    @pummyy 2 года назад +3

    What a legend. Starting with basics on what they are and why you need them. Great content. Thank you !

  • @snakerafi
    @snakerafi 4 года назад +1

    I can say you did the best straight to the point no BS video with real views. This is one of the few I can show to my kids and they get an idea what is all that about.

  • @Pouncerman
    @Pouncerman 4 года назад +5

    Wow that was very good! I thought all a Barlow did was magnify the image on the diagonal mirror. I'll try putting it in front of the diagonal just to satisfy my curiosity. Thanks for a lot of good knowledge.

  • @bharatisgreate
    @bharatisgreate 4 года назад +3

    Great explanation buddy, and it was fun with full of information. thank you for the your detailed guide. Lot of love from India to you!!!

  • @donaldhalvorsen4135
    @donaldhalvorsen4135 2 года назад

    Thank you for all of your hard work Simon.

  • @johngiromini5745
    @johngiromini5745 5 лет назад +11

    Very nice method of explaining Barlow features. When I want to photograph from a 12" DOB, I use a 2x Barlow to push the focal point further back to accommodate the camera position. Otherwise, one can't obtain a focused object.

    • @AstroBlender
      @AstroBlender  4 года назад

      John Giromini Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @vyli1
    @vyli1 3 года назад +3

    Wow, this was such a fantastic explanation and so detailed. Amazing.

  • @MountainFisher
    @MountainFisher 2 года назад

    I have a C6-N, great scope, or at least mine is, although I noticed in the first month the secondary kept going out of collimation. I figured out not to pick up the scope with the front cap off, thus keeping me from grabbing it by the front rim pulling the vanes on that side knocking it out of collimation. Cradle it to install on the side sitting mount. My first reflector.
    I learned a lot about Barlows from this video. I saw my view dim when I used a Barlow and this certainly explained why. Also taught me how to slow down my F5 when using a really bright Orthoscopic eyepiece.

  • @jeffreygilbert2628
    @jeffreygilbert2628 4 года назад +4

    Great video! Without a doubt the most in-depth description I've seen thus far, keep up the great work.
    -J.G.

    • @AstroBlender
      @AstroBlender  4 года назад

      Jeffrey Gilbert Thanks, I appreciate it!

  • @bobmarshall1066
    @bobmarshall1066 2 года назад +4

    A great article on Barlows, thank you. However, I Would like to make an important point with regard to the so called brightness of the image as you discussed. Ok, yes a Barlow, even fully multi coated will reduce the light a little, but and here's my point. You used the same exposure and ISO setting on the camera, but, as soon as you introduce a Barlow, the whole system will be slower photographically. So if you use the same exposure and ISO setting, of course the image will be less bright, or underexposed. F/8 becomes F/16 or F/32 and so on. Visually, there won't be too much difference at the same magnification, or a longer focal length eyepiece. Please don't overlook the fact that some of us still do visual astronomy :)

  • @crdave43
    @crdave43 4 года назад +1

    Awesome video, I learnt so much, Thank you

  • @mosesrodriguez1494
    @mosesrodriguez1494 3 месяца назад

    Thank you for the lesson

  • @andelkoloncar4791
    @andelkoloncar4791 4 года назад +1

    Probably the best explanation so far, GREAT job!!

    • @AstroBlender
      @AstroBlender  4 года назад

      Anďelko Lončar Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @glennsubawalla9884
    @glennsubawalla9884 4 года назад +1

    Thank you slymin for all the info on barlows a very good effort put in by you.

    • @AstroBlender
      @AstroBlender  4 года назад

      GLENN Subawalla Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @RA-wn3qh
    @RA-wn3qh 3 года назад +1

    This was a really great explanation . Thanks !

  • @danhilz1629
    @danhilz1629 3 года назад +1

    Fantastic explanation. I learned a lot.

  • @Bippy55
    @Bippy55 3 года назад +3

    March 2021 - OMWord!! You had me with the laser lines and the two lens " () )( >• " to show how they affect rays of light. Advice: Please don't underestimate your drawing and illustration skills. You did a great job. Now we need another video to talk about eyepiece filters: red, blue, and a 'moon filter' or 18% light reduction. "Optics Is Cool!"

  • @MM0IMC
    @MM0IMC 4 года назад +3

    Reminds me of the old teleconverters back in the 35mm SLR days, the doubled the image size, but halved the light arriving at the film plane. Image quality wasn't as sharp as it could have been. Inverse Square Law also applies.

  • @henri-julienchartrand3387
    @henri-julienchartrand3387 5 лет назад

    I agree with Peter on this one. HJ from Montréal, QC Canada.

  • @august3777
    @august3777 4 года назад +8

    I'm looking to buy my first telescope for deep sky imaging, and I just learned about barlow lens, so this video helped me a lot. Thank you for explaining It all.

    • @AstroBlender
      @AstroBlender  4 года назад +2

      Buttermilk Biscuits Glad you found it helpful.

  • @IGATECK
    @IGATECK 3 года назад

    Great video, what kind of adapter you used to mount the t3i? Thanks

  • @ruthlessadmin
    @ruthlessadmin 4 года назад +1

    That was more than I ever needed or even wanted to know. Thanks!

  • @RichardPhilbin
    @RichardPhilbin 3 года назад

    Excellent video !

  • @l.mendes8208
    @l.mendes8208 3 года назад +1

    Excellent explanation! Congrats!

  • @chaitanyavashistha446
    @chaitanyavashistha446 4 года назад +17

    Best explanation ever on internet. Thank You from all of astro community.
    And we are also proud on your Jupiter and Refrector diagram.

    • @Malignus68
      @Malignus68 3 года назад +3

      Yeah, his explanation is far beyond what I expected to see. He did an awesome job.

    • @AstroBlender
      @AstroBlender  3 года назад +2

      Glad you enjoyed it, thanks.

  • @bobsbarnworkshop
    @bobsbarnworkshop 3 года назад +1

    I’m just getting back into astronomy after close to 50 years. My wife gifted me a Celestron 8se for Christmas so I’m ready to go! Great explanation of the math and light loss in a Barlow. I only have a 25mm eyepiece to start but plan on a couple more like maybe a 15mm and 10mm and a Barlow 2X. I need a couple filters including a solar. Back in 1970 I photographed the solar eclipse made famous in the song “You’re so vain” through a Sears 3” refractor with a solar filter and a 10mm and a Polaroid camera on a tripod lined up to the eyepiece! But most of the shots turned out great!

    • @DuderinoDeux
      @DuderinoDeux 2 года назад

      V powerful scope mag wise. Get a lens corrector and much higher eyepieces too for wider views. Plossls are great. Barlow great for blowing up Jupiter and Saturn. A good refractor 700-900mm a great companion.

  • @PrepperStateofMind
    @PrepperStateofMind 3 года назад

    Great video. Learned a lot

  • @Jupitor108
    @Jupitor108 4 года назад +3

    Great video, really informative and useful!! Thank you !!

  • @mireazma
    @mireazma 3 года назад +10

    15:26 An even simpler explanation is: 2X lens = 4x less light because it's 2x for each dimension. We have a 2 dimensional sensor :)

    • @MrFlextor
      @MrFlextor 3 года назад

      Yes, it is not the fault of an existing coating and it´s quality to make objects dimm when using a barlow ( yes the effect is there but with very small impact ), it is the f-ratio increase which affects the brightness of the view!
      So for example shooting a picture with ISO 200 and f/11 gives you the same time value like shooting the same situation under same conditions at ISO400 and f/16.
      That means a full step in the f-ration ( which is exactly a full step in between f11 and f16 - same from 1.4-2-2.8-4-5.6-8-11-16-22 ) doubles the time or needs twice the sensitivity to get the same brightness, that is the magic behind, NOT the coatings which have a very low impact...
      To make it exact, the full-step or down in the f-ratio row is the sqare root of 2 , the numbers above are appoximate values :-)

  • @sureshlingabathina
    @sureshlingabathina 5 лет назад +1

    Excellent

  • @magnusengevik750
    @magnusengevik750 5 лет назад +4

    VERY informative video, thanks!

    • @AstroBlender
      @AstroBlender  5 лет назад

      You're welcome! I am glad you found it helpful!

  • @webchez69
    @webchez69 5 лет назад +5

    You are an amazing young man... You have a future as a scientist...

  • @backyardskygazer
    @backyardskygazer 2 месяца назад

    I cant thank you enough for posting this and saving me some money. I am new to the hobby and have a nester 8se as well but from what I saw in the video that lens is not for me just yet, shall we say. Thank you so much again for posting this video.

  • @bobbya8622
    @bobbya8622 3 года назад

    Thanks. Very helpful!

  • @Wilhuff_T
    @Wilhuff_T 4 года назад +2

    Excellent presentation.

  • @brokenstring21
    @brokenstring21 3 года назад +1

    I appreciate you and your channel. Godbless.

  • @bicycleninja1685
    @bicycleninja1685 3 года назад

    That laser example is pretty great! Also, the illustration is not too shabby.

  • @yav349
    @yav349 3 месяца назад

    Excelente!!!

  • @Malignus68
    @Malignus68 3 года назад

    Spectacular job on this video and explanation!

  • @hooper365
    @hooper365 Год назад

    I found this video extremely helpful and well made thanks 🙏👍

  • @TheUrbanAstronomer
    @TheUrbanAstronomer 4 года назад +2

    Nice in-depth video!

    • @AstroBlender
      @AstroBlender  4 года назад +1

      Thanks, I am glad you enjoyed it!

  • @filipesilvestre6214
    @filipesilvestre6214 3 года назад +6

    Thanks for making this video. I like the dark circle on Jupiter!

  • @mertus4395
    @mertus4395 3 года назад +5

    Amazing in-depth video! I learned a lot, thanks a lot :D
    And don't worry for your fantastic drawings, they're great too lol

  • @TheBongConnection1410
    @TheBongConnection1410 Год назад

    Great video

  • @technologyandyou296
    @technologyandyou296 2 года назад

    Really awesome 👏🏻 Buddy you explain things very well 👌🏻

  • @Weathership
    @Weathership 3 года назад

    Nice job,,,,

  • @sanpol4399
    @sanpol4399 4 года назад +5

    Absolutely great video. The laser rays were so didactic !

    • @AstroBlender
      @AstroBlender  4 года назад +3

      Thank you, I am glad you enjoyed it!

  • @swaldron5558
    @swaldron5558 3 года назад

    Thanks for your interesting information.

  • @jerrykapchan103
    @jerrykapchan103 2 года назад

    Thanks Slymin!

  • @nespratnicinacestach5002
    @nespratnicinacestach5002 3 года назад

    thank you for your effort!!!

  • @frankkenyon798
    @frankkenyon798 4 года назад +3

    Slymin, Another great video! I couldn't help but notice you have an Explore Scientific diagonal on your 8 SE this time instead
    of the Celestron you recently reviewed. Can you compare the 2, please.

  • @alexwkinney
    @alexwkinney 3 года назад

    Great video, thanks!!!

  • @explosivebrickstudios2693
    @explosivebrickstudios2693 3 года назад

    Thank you so much for this tutorial, you probably saved me a lot of money! ♥️

    • @AstroBlender
      @AstroBlender  3 года назад

      ExplosiveBrickStudios Glad you found it helpful.

    • @martinmcbrown6437
      @martinmcbrown6437 3 года назад

      @@AstroBlender Hey mate, question from me as a new telescope owner: should I invest into 4.7mm 82degree eyepiece or should i use barlowed lens?

  • @humlakullen
    @humlakullen 4 года назад +5

    Awesome video. Thanks:-)!

    • @AstroBlender
      @AstroBlender  4 года назад

      You're welcome, I am glad you enjoyed it!

  • @jimtekkit
    @jimtekkit Год назад

    Brother, your explanation is excellent. If the basic principles are this simple then why doesn't anyone explain it as such?
    I feel like a lot of reviewers get caught up in the subjectivity of viewing experiences and neglect to explain the fundamentals of how optics work. And that no amount of quality or design tricks or brand marketing can overcome the inherent disadvantages. That's why so many amateur astronomers believe that a 6mm lens with a 5x barlow is the best viewing experience.

  • @melangkoh4184
    @melangkoh4184 4 года назад

    hey, have you ever tested the Svbony 66 degree wide-angle budget-eyepieces?

  • @KaHaDa_life
    @KaHaDa_life 4 года назад +1

    THANKS MAN! NICE VID!

    • @AstroBlender
      @AstroBlender  4 года назад

      Канада life Glad you liked it.

  • @randommadness1021
    @randommadness1021 3 года назад

    How do you change the exposure times? Thanks.

  • @morganmitchell4017
    @morganmitchell4017 5 лет назад +32

    Great video. Clearly a lot of effort went into it so it's a shame you're only in the hundreds of views. Subscribed though!

    • @AstroBlender
      @AstroBlender  4 года назад +1

      Morgan Mitchell Thanks for your support!

    • @TechnoEsoterica
      @TechnoEsoterica 4 года назад +3

      30k+ now though!

    • @jasonnikolic
      @jasonnikolic 3 года назад

      @@TechnoEsoterica and it's doubled in 4 months (60k+)

    • @knightclan4
      @knightclan4 3 года назад

      Almost 87k after a year.
      Slow and steady for educational videos.
      Now if he hired a model in a bikini to talk Barlow , he might have gone viral.
      There’s a thought

  • @GalaxyArtMedia
    @GalaxyArtMedia 3 года назад

    Hello. Niceg formula, but it can get you confused when you first see it, I am used to calculate the stops of light depending on the new focal ratio number that you will have with a specific barlow lens. But actually using this formula could make the calculations more easy to make.

  • @CarolinaSkyAstronomy
    @CarolinaSkyAstronomy 5 лет назад +3

    I like to use a 2x for lunar and a 3x for planetary and yes you do have to turn the exposure up more but you get a better view of the planets with a 3x

    • @danielfinch362
      @danielfinch362 4 года назад +1

      I'm knew to this but I just commented I don't think you'd get much luck with more than x3 Barlow lens.

  • @andonrangelov8844
    @andonrangelov8844 4 года назад

    I got a question about the barlow lens. I got spherical prime mirror reflector telescope with short focal length of 300mm (mirror diameter is 76mm) if I use a x2 barlow is it going to reduce the spherical aberrations? I mean if it enlarge the focal length then may be it also reduce the spherical aberrations?

  • @BobtheScienceGuy
    @BobtheScienceGuy 3 года назад

    Nicely done. If you need a 1 min exposure and add a 4x Barlow you would need 16 min exposures. Can you take 16 1 min exposures and get the same effect?

  • @GTGeorgeW
    @GTGeorgeW 3 года назад

    great video Cody !, -- QQ -- any chance you can link the lens kit you used?

  • @BrandonJEvansPhotography
    @BrandonJEvansPhotography 2 года назад

    I about lost it at the end when you mentioned mispronouncing "vignetting" because every time you said it I was correcting you in my head. Ha! I actually learned a lot this video!

  • @bluename4
    @bluename4 4 года назад

    what would the effect be, if combining a Focal Reducer and a Barlow Lense together?

  • @Station2066
    @Station2066 3 года назад

    Wow that was awesome 🌜🌜🌜🌜

  • @Janet_Airlines802
    @Janet_Airlines802 4 года назад

    What camera do you use?

  • @Quoutub
    @Quoutub 2 года назад

    I am surprised that nearly nobody in the comments noticed that the brightness explanation is wrong. A barlow or teleconverter doesn't reduce the amount of light one captures from an object. It makes it darker, but it doesn't reduce the amount of light from an object.

  • @redfireroush
    @redfireroush 3 года назад

    Very helpful video!! Nothing like cramming a little more math into my aging brain. ;)

  • @anujitmaity0722
    @anujitmaity0722 3 года назад

    Thanks❤️❤️❤️❤️🌚

  • @TwoPancakes
    @TwoPancakes 4 года назад

    i wanted to see what would happen if you would put the concave lens first and the convex lens second. Wouldnt that flatten and magnify the image?

  • @noreaction1
    @noreaction1 2 года назад +1

    Is it better to put the barlow lens closer to the sensor compared to filters? Or vise versa

  • @rob2estonia
    @rob2estonia 2 года назад

    The lasers earned you an automatic like.

  • @arcvidelos8008
    @arcvidelos8008 3 года назад

    Does a Barlow with a 1.25" barrel cause vignetting on eyepieces that exceed a certain apparent field of view?

  • @G3RMZONE
    @G3RMZONE 4 года назад +1

    i saw on another video that recommends placing the barlow lens before the 90d elbow, does it make a difference where the barlow is placed?

    • @danielfinch362
      @danielfinch362 4 года назад

      Nice question, I do hope someone answers.

    • @AstroBlender
      @AstroBlender  4 года назад +3

      As a general rule of thumb if you insert a barlow before a diagonal you will get more magnification, but your equipment might not be so secure with all the weight, so most put it after a diagonal. For imaging I usually insert my barlow first since my planetary camera doesn't weight that much. I would experiment and see what works best for your set-up.

  • @Ivanzizek
    @Ivanzizek Год назад

    Good video, can you tell me what barlow lens is the Best for beginner telescope and that price is not expensive

  • @musikmantracollections7037
    @musikmantracollections7037 3 года назад

    Can u explain if i use 2x barlow how to. Focus with diagram... I am confused as u said double the focal length then we have to use long telescope.. earlier i m using 700 m fl telescope.

  • @davidmcfadden1763
    @davidmcfadden1763 4 года назад

    Aha! That explains why the ring nebula was so dim with my barlow! It was dim to begin with, in my C8 se, so when I barlowed it, it all but disappeared!

    • @AstroBlender
      @AstroBlender  4 года назад

      david mcfadden Oh yes, definitely!

  • @jessale
    @jessale 3 года назад +1

    7:30... OMG, seeing that Jupiter makes me happy. I love that Jupiter. 😆 🤣 😂

  • @johnnolan8074
    @johnnolan8074 3 года назад +1

    Thanks for the info. Curious if you use a 2" Barlow with a 11/4 " eyepiece. Is there any benefits to that?

    • @AstroBlender
      @AstroBlender  3 года назад

      John Nolan Not really besides you have the option of using 2” eyepieces.

    • @johnnolan8074
      @johnnolan8074 3 года назад

      @@AstroBlender thank you much. Clear skies

  • @IsmaelMartinezPR
    @IsmaelMartinezPR 3 года назад

    I stumbled on this video, and it seems these lenses are about the same as a teleconverter in photography. Why would you use ISO 800 and 1/1600, why not start at lower ISO. Is it to double the focal length in the time of the exposure. totally new to this.

  • @bobminion198
    @bobminion198 3 года назад

    I have celestron starsense 130 mm reflector telescope. Could you recommend the best barlow lens for my telescope? Thank you.

  • @panthergaming732
    @panthergaming732 Год назад

    Hi! If I use high powered eyepiece without Barlow and a low powered eyepiece with a Barlow, both have the same magnification. Which one will produce a brighter image?

  • @richardbarnes3665
    @richardbarnes3665 Год назад

    What kind of lasers did you use?

  • @zygmuntziokowski7877
    @zygmuntziokowski7877 Год назад

    Question are you use 1.25" or 2" barlow lines?

  • @djsundayrides4869
    @djsundayrides4869 4 года назад +1

    Great video what if I just wanted to look a the planets would I still need a Barlow lens and would that just make the planets clearer ?

    • @AstroBlender
      @AstroBlender  4 года назад +1

      DJ Sunday Rides No, you don’t need a Barlow lens. You’ll find a Barlow will increase magnification but your view will be a bit more blurry depending on sky conditions.

    • @djsundayrides4869
      @djsundayrides4869 4 года назад

      @@AstroBlender Thank you for your help new to this I hope I brought the right one lol

  • @anthonypla7134
    @anthonypla7134 3 года назад

    Clear explanation was very helpful, however, pie are round not squared

  • @daslolo
    @daslolo 4 года назад

    And you can formate compensate for bad atmospheric conditions by using both eyes: binoviewer. Good only for bright objects

  • @stevemacdonald2303
    @stevemacdonald2303 7 месяцев назад

    I had a 5in dobson I used 3 Barlow and it was clear

  • @muhammadazeem7538
    @muhammadazeem7538 4 года назад +1

    Which telescope did you use to take image of the Jupiter?

    • @jessale
      @jessale 3 года назад +1

      🤣 😂

  • @kmason7914
    @kmason7914 Год назад

    What would happen if you added a focal reducer?

  • @dankahraman354
    @dankahraman354 4 года назад

    Is there a way of precisely calculating how much I would have to rack out my focuser to achieve a new focus point with a barlow lens? I tried to image Saturn last night with my 7" f/15 Maksutov and a 2.8x Klee Barlow but I didn't do anything to the focuser ( i had tested it in the daytime and I could see the top of an power insulator...so I didn't worry about it) long story short: I couldn't see anything on the laptop screen. I thought both the guide scope and main scope were pointing to the same exact location...what did I do wrong?

  • @MicoDominiqueNixon
    @MicoDominiqueNixon 3 года назад

    What brand and model of telescope are you using?

  • @aritramahapatra6959
    @aritramahapatra6959 3 года назад

    Sir I have a question about Barlow magnification how can I measure the Barlow magnification I said this bcz I bought a 5x Barlow but I received only 3x Barlow sir pls tell how to calculate Barlow magnification??????😭😭😭🙏🙏🙏

  • @thedonahoes
    @thedonahoes 3 года назад

    This is the best explanation of a Barlow I've seen. However, doesn't it make the images dimmer because you're effectively shooting through an f/25 instead of an f/10? I agree that the more optical elements you add, the more scatter you will have, and more light lost, regardless of coatings, But I would expect a slower optical system to produce dimmer images for a given exposure.

    • @thedonahoes
      @thedonahoes 3 года назад

      Oh... You address this around 17:00 . Should've waited to the end of the video to comment. Sorry.

  • @psycronizer
    @psycronizer 4 года назад +1

    I have recently bought a 8 inch Dob, and only have the 10 and 25 Plossl that it came with....so I want to know a bit more about the Barlow...there are x2 and x3 and even a x5 Barlow available is there an optical quality reduction if going for a x3 or x5 over the x2 ?..it just seems to me that it's too good to be true, that simply putting in a x5 Barlow is going to produce an image that is just as sharp as non Barlowed... comments ? what would you suggest in terms of planetary viewing...needless to say I will also be buying other lenses in the future as well...my Dob is 200mm main mirror and 1200mm focal length, so 400 times mag is the limit..how close to that theoretical limit can i get when viewing the planets, I want to squeeze as much magnification out of it as I can !

    • @AstroBlender
      @AstroBlender  4 года назад

      It really depends on sky conditions. I have never used a 5x barlow, and never will because for visual use anything beyond a 3x barlow just isn't useful for me. A 5x barlow is typically used for planetary imaging in areas with very stable skies. The 2x barlow is the most practical for everyday purposes. The 3x is pushing it a bit for me, but for imaging it works occasionally.

  • @dennisammann9104
    @dennisammann9104 2 года назад

    I was lost in space when he said, “Pie are square.” 🤔 Everyone knows pie are round. 🥧 😀🤣

  • @funkydevil13
    @funkydevil13 4 года назад +2

    Hi. I have celestron eq 130. I want to see planets and nebula. So suggest me barlow for that. 2x or 3x. Thanks in advance

    • @iDTecKt
      @iDTecKt 4 года назад

      I got the same scope and bought the eye piece kit, seems that the more magnification u put into it the more blurry the image becomes, im disappointed

    • @DirkDirk1983
      @DirkDirk1983 3 года назад

      @@iDTecKt eyepieces that come in a kit useally are not of the best quality.

    • @iDTecKt
      @iDTecKt 3 года назад

      @@DirkDirk1983 Hi bro, yeh well i only paid £55 for the Celestron 94307 kit, is there anything u could recommend and i might return this

    • @DirkDirk1983
      @DirkDirk1983 3 года назад

      @@iDTecKt so you have a 15mm kellner and a 6mm plossl. I suggest you'll upgrade the kellner 15mm. But I need a bit more info. What is the telescope you are using and will you be using it for planets or deepsky?

    • @DirkDirk1983
      @DirkDirk1983 3 года назад

      @@iDTecKt wait. You have the same scope as funcky devil. Let me make a new message when i get home from work