Flying the North American FJ2 Fury (US Navy version of the F-86 Sabre jet) 1953

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 сен 2024
  • "Watch the Korean War era training film used to familiarize new pilots with the North American FJ-2 Fury, the US Navy's version of the F-86 Sabre," Zeno, Zeno's Warbird Video Drive-In www.zenoswarbir... Don't miss our F-86/FJ2 DVD with 5 more videos & 438-page F-86 pilot's manual! bit.ly/IPLwbM
    The Navy rushed their version of the F-86 into production because they needed a carrier launched fighter that could take on Russian Migs during the Korean War. The biggest difference between the F-86 and the FJ2 was strengthened landing gear on the Navy version that could take e pounding when landing on a heaving aircraft carrier deck.

Комментарии • 22

  • @ZenosWarbirds
    @ZenosWarbirds  7 лет назад +1

    Like what you see? Your DVD purchases at our store make this channel possible.
    www.zenosflightshop.com
    We need your support! Zeno

  • @raysmith7543
    @raysmith7543 4 года назад +3

    I really enjoy these old training films!

  • @johnasbury7511
    @johnasbury7511 3 года назад +1

    One of the last of these is located at The Saber Society at the Hickory municipal airport. In Hickory N.C. I used to play in it as a child before they completely restored it . Thanks to the US Navy for donating a complete engine for it.

  • @user-sb4sf5cu6n
    @user-sb4sf5cu6n Год назад +2

    Thank you for this wonderful and nice video.
    I could study about Fj2 Fury.
    F86 navy version Fj2, is also handsome!
    NAVY colored body is very cool like a french-chartreux cat(dark blue-grey big cat).

  • @billjamison2877
    @billjamison2877 4 года назад

    Beautiful aircraft. Great stuff here.

  • @beeleo
    @beeleo 7 лет назад +4

    It's nice to see the Navy versdion.

  • @orange70383
    @orange70383 9 лет назад +10

    Imagine having that plane 10-years earlier.

    • @rcpilot9963
      @rcpilot9963 7 лет назад

      The opposing force for sure will have something like Mig-15 this time as technical progress is almost identical in good prospering, rich countries.

    • @lycossurfer8851
      @lycossurfer8851 6 лет назад +2

      Somebody did, it was called the ME 262. Not too much fun for the opposition.
      Thankfully our guys did play it's weakness properly

    • @c-028
      @c-028 5 лет назад +1

      Then Pearl Harbor attack may never happen.

    • @1badhaircut
      @1badhaircut 4 года назад

      Lycos Surfer the worst weakness was that it had to land

  • @petero.7487
    @petero.7487 4 года назад +1

    I'm curious if the reason the buffet boundary zone takes on the curve that it does. I know to some degree it's due to mach effect increasing with KEAS, I guess from there it drops off a bit as AoA decreases, then increases as you come right up on the barrier, then goes away as the shockwave nears the tail and shrinks up, and the detached flow stars to shrink.

  • @geosutube
    @geosutube 5 лет назад +3

    The advanced hydraulics on these aircraft are why they were able to defeat the MiB pilots, who had no such hydraulic controls, and were simply worn out trying to defeat these planes.

  • @viperdriver82
    @viperdriver82 5 лет назад +2

    First AirForce jet to go Navy

    • @tracywilkinson1820
      @tracywilkinson1820 4 года назад

      there are others?

    • @tracywilkinson1820
      @tracywilkinson1820 4 года назад +4

      Ronald Tartaglia F-4 was a Navy jet that went AF.

    • @tracywilkinson1820
      @tracywilkinson1820 4 года назад

      F2J/F-86 is to my knowledge the only AF jet to go to sea. A7, A3, F4 were all Navy jets that the AF bought. You could argue the F-111 also- which was developed as a fleet interceptor originally. YF-17 was a contender for the lightweight fighter competition that the F-16 won, so I guess that’s two :)

    • @paulfrantizek102
      @paulfrantizek102 4 года назад

      If you count the FJ1 as the starting point, it was a USN jet that went USAF then came back home.

    • @viperdriver82
      @viperdriver82 4 года назад +1

      @@paulfrantizek102 the FJ-1 is a much different airplane to the FJ-2/3 or the F-86

  • @stevoschannel4127
    @stevoschannel4127 6 лет назад +1

    Those were never carrier borne were they?

    • @viperdriver82
      @viperdriver82 5 лет назад +1

      You are thinking of the F-86 saber ......this is a navalized version of it

  • @robertoferrari5397
    @robertoferrari5397 3 года назад

    😃