my opinion, it was meaningless!!!!!! whether John was there or not. for far too long Tyson was put on a pedestal of being the best in his era without actually proving it. right now he stands at possibly joint 2nd or even 3rd-4th he still hasn't proved that he can beat AJ or dubious, so in affect he might only be 4th best in this era. he is definitely not the best.. in my opinion
my opinion, it was meaningless!!!!!! whether John was there or not. for far too long Tyson was put on a pedestal of being the best in his era without actually proving it. right now he stands at possibly joint 2nd or even 3rd-4th he still hasn't proved that he can beat AJ or dubious, so in affect he might only be 4th best in this era. he is definitely not the best.. in my opinion
If we actually look at who Fury has fought, there haven’t been too many big names really. AJ/Usyk’s resumes are a lot more impressive