Find the distance between skew lines

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 май 2016
  • In this video I define skew lines and go through the process of finding the distance between the two lines using the projection of a random vector connecting the two lines on to the normal vector of the two planes in which the skew lines exist.

Комментарии • 56

  • @adeshbhawanie8756
    @adeshbhawanie8756 6 лет назад +1

    best video ever..thank you so much love from suriname

  • @williewillertom827
    @williewillertom827 3 года назад

    thanks for this! so clarified

  • @yusra_qasem
    @yusra_qasem 6 лет назад

    It helped me a lot. Thanks

  • @Gregory-ud6zq
    @Gregory-ud6zq 2 года назад

    Saved me last minute thanks

  • @muhammadmurtaza6630
    @muhammadmurtaza6630 4 года назад

    thanks so much for this video!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is an amazing explanation!! love it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    definitely sharing this link

    • @gustavotyler8427
      @gustavotyler8427 2 года назад

      I realize I'm kinda randomly asking but does anyone know a good website to watch newly released series online ?

  • @manulchandula312
    @manulchandula312 2 года назад

    Thank u . Well explained 😃😍

  • @ilyuce
    @ilyuce 2 месяца назад +1

    why do they have to on parallel planes?

  • @jianhuang3434
    @jianhuang3434 2 года назад

    great explanation

  • @caitlynjohnson5158
    @caitlynjohnson5158 Год назад

    thank you so much!

  • @markcavendish7148
    @markcavendish7148 6 лет назад

    NICE EXPLANATION.

  • @challengecompleter1330
    @challengecompleter1330 2 года назад

    THANKS !

  • @BlueBrendan2000
    @BlueBrendan2000 6 лет назад +19

    I think you made a mistake at 8:34. When doing the dot product of vectors n and a, you multiplied 7 by -4 for the J component and got -18 when it should've been -28.

    • @MathBySarah
      @MathBySarah  3 года назад +12

      yep, I make typos sometimes and since my students are not with me when I make the videos they are not there to yell out that I made a mistake. :) videos are hard.

    • @jabezsolomon4730
      @jabezsolomon4730 10 месяцев назад +1

      ​​@@MathBySarah can it really be the shortest distance between the planes too ?

    • @MathBySarah
      @MathBySarah  10 месяцев назад +1

      Yes, in the way that I set this up there exist two parallel planes that each contain one of these lines.
      The perpendicular distance between the two planes is the shortest distance. So you only need to connect a point from each plain and project it onto their normal vector.

  • @kkuhhakku
    @kkuhhakku 2 года назад

    Thank you

  • @1lemn
    @1lemn Год назад +2

    how do you know that point (6,3,0) lies exactly at the foot of normal which intersects both the lines??

    • @MathBySarah
      @MathBySarah  10 месяцев назад +1

      The normal vector points in the direction perpendicular to both lines. It can be moved anywhere. We have not actually found the point where the lines are closest. We have just found the shortest distance between the two lines. More would have to be done to find where the lines are closest.

  • @rybread5718
    @rybread5718 7 лет назад

    NOICE!

  • @jaimahakal6472
    @jaimahakal6472 2 года назад +7

    Lol my teacher recommended me this video.😅😅:)

  • @abdomenebadellah
    @abdomenebadellah 3 года назад

    Allah bless you ☺️

  • @shantilkhadatkar1195
    @shantilkhadatkar1195 2 года назад +2

    I am here 😁

  • @awildscrub
    @awildscrub 4 месяца назад

    I think it'd be great if you could show why the magnitude of the projection of a onto n is d. Unlike in the case with parallel lines where the distance between the two lines does not change, it's not immediately obvious that in the scenario of skew lines, ||proj_n(a)|| is still d.

    • @awildscrub
      @awildscrub 4 месяца назад

      I'm not sure how you would explain this to someone who doesn't understand 3d linear transformations, because the way I made intuition of it was a 3d linear transformation that took (i,j,k) as inputs and outputs (n,r,p). Any 2 points you pick on the two lines, the vector formed, a1, will be where n1, r1 and p1 are constants. If you move these two points around, the new vector formed, a2, will be . Notice how only r1 and p1 changes while n1 (||proj_n(a)||) doesn't change, because you're only moving in the direction of r and p, and thus adding multiples of r and p. So it doesn't matter which 2 points you pick, ||proj_n(a)|| remains constant (n1).Now I just pick my 2 points to be the intersection point of n with r and p and you'll find that d = |a| = ||proj_n(a)||. To be clear, I'm no expert in this topic, as I've only learned the concept of linear transformations a few weeks prior, so take what I said with a grain or salt, and feel free to correct me on any errors I've made.

  • @neutron417
    @neutron417 2 года назад +2

    Lol who else came after Manoj Chauhan Sir's post

  • @icebade6651
    @icebade6651 Месяц назад

    How about if u cross product axn

  • @kabilanm4969
    @kabilanm4969 3 года назад

    | Vr X Vp| , that is modulus of the cross product of the two vectors Vr and Vp itself will give the shortest distance.what is the purpose of projecting the distance vector on to the cross product.please clarify

    • @carultch
      @carultch Год назад

      The cross product takes two general vectors in 3-dimensional space, and finds a third vector that is mutually perpendicular to both of them. The shortest distance between two lines is perpendicular to both lines. In 2-d space, this is only possible with parallel lines. We can take two equations for parallel lines, generate a perpendicular line, and solve for where it intersects both of them, and the distance between those two points will tell us how close the two parallel lines are.
      Same reasoning applies for 3-D skew lines, except there is only one perpendicular line that makes the closest approach between the two of them. You use the cross product to generate a mutually perpendicular vector to both of the lines. Then make it a unit vector. Then form a vector between any two points on the two given lines (keep it simple by choosing the initial points of the given lines). Take the dot product of this vector and (the unit vector of the cross product vector). That tells you the distance.

  • @BonusGodbless
    @BonusGodbless 14 дней назад

    I gained a lot

  • @timallenlacaba2968
    @timallenlacaba2968 3 года назад +1

    How did you know that x not for p(s) is the point of which a normal vector of the plane p lies on intersects line r(t)?

    • @shreyasbhokare7192
      @shreyasbhokare7192 2 года назад

      I don't know whether your doubt is solved or not but i had a same doubt !!!

    • @shreyasbhokare7192
      @shreyasbhokare7192 2 года назад

      if you try to calculate distance by having everything as variables at end you will see whether the fixed point is at the foot of perpendicular or not the distance comes to be constant.

    • @shreyasbhokare7192
      @shreyasbhokare7192 2 года назад

      that is same in both case , but the case with the fixed point here (6,3,0) at the foot of perpendicular is easy to visualise though it is not correct to assume it as assumed in the video !! (still answere doesn't change with or without the assumption )

  • @Jamillakitchen
    @Jamillakitchen 2 месяца назад

    The answer you got from projecting is a vector, isnt it so that you have to |d|= d * d and then find out the distance? so confused teachers do different

  • @xiaohongmei6082
    @xiaohongmei6082 2 года назад

    I find a mistake at last step 18 should be 28 and need absolute value

  • @BonusGodbless
    @BonusGodbless 14 дней назад

    And their was a mistake in your calculation.
    U wrote -27+44-18 instead of -27+44-28. Am sorry that I drop this in comment section instead of private message. Thanks ❤

  • @BonusGodbless
    @BonusGodbless 14 дней назад

    But the answer i got is -11/√41.

  • @kabilanm4969
    @kabilanm4969 3 года назад

    once the two skew lines are contained in parallel planes, then they become PARALLEL.The explanation gets flawed there itself

    • @MathBySarah
      @MathBySarah  3 года назад +4

      Think about two planes that are flying in the sky one at 10,000 feet and the other at 20,000 feet. These two planes are flying within parallel planes. But one plane is flying due north while the other plane is flying due east. These two planes will never intersect, and they are not flying parallel to each other, their direction vectors are not the same. Their paths are skew lines and the shortest distance between the two paths that is 10,000 feet.

    • @kabilanm4969
      @kabilanm4969 3 года назад

      @@MathBySarah thanks for your reply

    • @hooligan1717
      @hooligan1717 Год назад

      @@MathBySarah But one can draw lines on the walls and floor of a room that are skew and those planes (wall, floor) intersect.

    • @MathBySarah
      @MathBySarah  Год назад

      @@hooligan1717 you are right, but there are an infinite number of planes in which a line in 3-dimensional space can exist on. If two lines are skew then there is a set of parallel planes in which they exist. That set would then allow us to find the shortest distance between the two lines in the same method. To find these planes they would have to have parallel normal vectors and contain each of the direction vectors. The points on the line would anchor them in space.

  • @AnuragSharma-jz5jr
    @AnuragSharma-jz5jr 6 лет назад

    English ke chodal hawe ka

  • @piacademy4255
    @piacademy4255 3 года назад

    Y u stop teaching.?

    • @MathBySarah
      @MathBySarah  3 года назад +3

      I am switching careers. I have graded enough homework sets and exams to fill a lifetime, and being a college instructor does not pay enough for me to send my own kids to college so I need to be in a career that will pay a little more than just above the poverty line. I enjoy explaining stuff to my friends and their children, so if you need something just ask, and I might have time to make more videos.

    • @challengecompleter1330
      @challengecompleter1330 2 года назад +1

      @@MathBySarah
      You are just awesome CUZ this video clarified a big doubt I had.
      Hope everything is fine :)

  • @gallilos
    @gallilos 3 года назад

    why N and vecA start at (6,3,0) thats not true!!!

    • @MathBySarah
      @MathBySarah  3 года назад +1

      Line a goes through the point (6,3,0)
      A vector valued function does is a collection of vectors whose tail is at the origin and whose head is a point on the line. That being said am not sure what you think is wrong. If you give me a time in the video I can take a look and explain further. I don't know how else to respond to this comment.

    • @gallilos
      @gallilos 3 года назад

      @@MathBySarah thanks so much .will get back to you 🙏

  • @jameschan2404
    @jameschan2404 3 года назад

    Really poor handwriting.

  • @__b5866
    @__b5866 Год назад

    ur account on insta