Mark Penns opinion on how people feel about Walz is basically the opposite to every other opinion I've seen, and to be honest, I think he is wrong also in my personal oipinion. I believe Walz was a much better option for VP than Shaprio. He also said he reckons calling people "Weird" as a strategy isn't going to make a difference, but it clearly already has. The guy doesn't seem to have his finger on the pulse of the younger generations vote.
That interviewee had no idea what he was talking about, he was just a salty partisan that provided no substantive arguments. Odd choice to include and definitely should've pushed back at at least some of what he was saying.
Suggesting that not picking shapiro is anti semitic is very irresponsible. Shapiro already has numerous scandals that have come to light, there's very genuine political reasons to not pick him
aside from his ability to win PA, he doesn’t bring anything to the table. not to mention, he can still work PA to help Harris and Walz win without being the actual VP pick. Something he has already started to do thankfully
Totally agree. Shapiro is very pro-Israel. Anyone on the left whos politically active knows that the mass murder underway in Gaza is a ‘base’ issue in this election. Harris needs to energise the base, not deflate it. Picking Shapiro meant sowing discord inside the party on the horrific issue of Gaza. She didn’t need that division and she’s clever to avoid it. It has nothing whatsoever to do with Shapiro’s ethnicity.
"One of the legends of Democratic politics" might not quite be enough viewer information. Perhaps also worth mentioning Penn's 6 years spent as CEO of the notorious Burson-Marsteller PR firm, or his consultancy company's work for clients like Texaco, Ford, BP, Merck, and McDonalds. Noteworthy too that he was forced to step down as Hilary Clinton's strategist after it emerged that his work at the same time for the Colombian gov on behalf of Burson-Marsteller was a conflict of interest. Penn was reportedly very divisive within the Clinton campaign team, and by 2018 was a Fox News regular, expressing concern that the Dems were moving too much to the left.
The political pundits who like to think they know everything, who were calling for Josh Shapiro to be VP hate this VP pick with a passion, particularly the right-wing democrats (who like to call themselves”moderates”) and former republicans. The reality is that Harris has a problem on the left. The left of the Democratic Party don’t like her because of her politics. This interviewer mentioned her performance in the 2020 presidential primaries, where she was obviously courting the left of centre vote. This was because her record is very right wing - she would be very comfortable in the Australian Liberal Party under Peter Dutton. If Harris had gone with the picks that right wing pundits like this interviewer had preferred, she may well have alienated enough voters on the left of the Democratic Party (which is located at the political centre) that Harris may have lost the election with her VP pick.
I liked it. It shows the decision making and different sides within a party. Clearly this guy was disappointed but he didn't come across as partisan. Maybe a touch salty his horse didn't win the race.
Josh Shapiro had a very similar background to Harris except for ethnicity. So, it is good she picked someone who will represent rural America and is endorsed by both left and moderates. It is a win-win.
I'm Swedish. And for me the Democrats are too conservative for me. But as Trump is a danger to everyone I'm happy it seems Walz works fine and brings positivity
@@martinhumble I was talking about the interview with the guy that trotted out an antisemitic dog whistle and was wrong on every front. I good with Walz too. And I agree. Americans think their center is the benchmark, I'd say it's to far to the right.
Chaz's obsession with RFK being brutally honest is hilarious. He clearly loved it when the bear story broke. It both reinforces RFKs honesty trait and the fact the craziest shit seems to happen around him.
You need to post the video applauding Walz’ handling of the BLM riots, while talking, to U.S. governors. Walz is the perfect choice for V.P. & am a Pennsylvania resident who loves having Josh Shapiro as my governor. Harris-Walz 2024 🇺🇸
Legendary strategies, my foot he has no idea. Tim Walz is completely completely energized even more a very excited Democratic Party and frankly a lot of Republicans too.
Being a pollster and chief strategist on a losing presidential campaign does not make Mark Penn "legendary". Bemoaning the fact that there'll be a united convention, attributing anti-semitism to Shapiro not being the running mate highlights this guy's real status as a Dem has-been. His only chance of future relevancy was Shapiro, hence his sour grapes.
Tim Walz is an excellent pick. Your guest doesn't know what he is talking about. Shapiro is not mad about not being picked by for Vice the President. So, let Democrats move forward for the pick. Vote for Kamala Harris for the President in November 2024 and Democrats. 💙💙💙💙💙💙
Shapiro is not VP material. He still has alot to do in his own State. My pick was Walz & a few younger guys who didn't make the final list. The choice appears to be working out well so far. A down to earth guy rather than a business suit is what Dems need right now to win.
Why did Chas Licciardello have to leave the 'room' during the interview with Mark Penn? Has Mark Penn banned him? It was awkward and quite noticeable. Planet America 7/08/2024
It's easy to dupe the American public regarding terms of military service. Only 1% of Americans serve on active duty and ~6% of Americans perform any service. I think only about 30% of young adults are qualified for service. Given all that, the specific terms used by service members or defined by the Department of Defense (DoD) is not necessarily what the average person would think. Combat could mean service in a specific geographic area during a specific period of time as defined by DoD (for tax purposes*), sometime referred to as "In the box" or "down range" by service members of a certain age. It could also mean being in a combat engagement, being fired upon, firing at, hitting an IED, etc., an experience sometimes being awarded a combat service badge. This does not necessarily have to happen in a combat zone (I think), but it would make sense that it usually does. War service for a service member is any work done under orders (written by the Dept of the Army/Navy/etc. and assigned the service member by name ) specifically stating the wartime operation of support., OEF, OIF, IFOR, SFOR, etc. For a guardsman or reservist, it will mean getting "Active Duty" orders. Those orders could station a person anywhere in the world to do that support mission. It could mean being sent to patrol streets in Bagdad, or it could mean going to Fort Anywhere in America to add personal for a task needing more people, or back filling a station so that the other personnel can go down range. Rank at separation does not cancel the rank earned or served while on duty. Rank during duty can be the rank on the paycheck or, on occasion, be a "frocked" rank of one paygrade above what's on the paycheck. When a person has attended a rank by promotion but not held it for a specific time period before separation (time in grade - (TIG)), the retirement rank is a rank lower - or at least this is what it sounds like happened to Walz. The military branches will also do this when members transfer among active, reserve, and guard units. This retirement rank does nothing to discredit the fact that he achieved and served at a higher rank. This is all sophistry and it will work well on an never-served audience who wants to hear it. Equally, people use lay terms to denigrate J.D.'s combat service, and it is a disservice to J.D. and other veterans. It sounds to me that he was in a combat zone and that, to me, is combat. Whether it was his job to patrol or not, whether he had a combat specific job or not, he was in a combat zone and at higher risk of dying from enemy action. To be sure, he was carrying a loaded weapon and prepared to shot the enemy if engaged. He was at the same risk as a combat arms soldier of being ambushed, under rocket attack, or hitting an IED. Rockets and IEDs kill a lot of deployed personnel, many of them civilians, and I don't think anyone wants to claim that a Department of the Army civilian killed by a rocket did not serve in combat. You don't have to have a mission of movement to contact to be in danger in a combat zone. Saying that J.D. didn't serve in combat is wrong. On the flip side, Walz served in a combat job, artillery, yet it sounds like he never fired a shot against the enemy, nor ever served with a combat arms unit in the combat zone. Conversely, J.D. had a combat service support job, but it was in a combat zone. It's a whole lot of word play and to me it means far less than claiming to have grown up in a small town in the Midwest and truly having grown up in a small town in Nebraska vs claiming to have grown up in western Kentucky Appalachia and truly having grown up in the suburbs of western Ohio. *serving one day of a month in combat zone makes the service member's pay for that month tax-free. As such, it is sought after by service members, and carefully defined by the service branches.
I wish main stream media would stop with their on sided democratic propaganda and give us honest news so those of us who are undecided can make an objective choice. The agreement to debate was not made with Kamala Harris it was made with Joe Biden and she knows that. It looks to me that she's the one who is afraid to debate trump and that's why she won't budge off the one that has a partisan moderator on a partisan news platform, where she would likely get the questions in advance.
Mainstream media spins Democratic propaganda. Kamala is running scared. FoxNews would be a much fairer moderator. Clearly undecided and seeking objectivity.
Me: "why is Chas not there for the interview?"
Mark Penn: *opens mouth*
Me: "yep. Makes total sense."
Yes, the nap makes a lot of sense now. 😂
Mark Penns opinion on how people feel about Walz is basically the opposite to every other opinion I've seen, and to be honest, I think he is wrong also in my personal oipinion. I believe Walz was a much better option for VP than Shaprio. He also said he reckons calling people "Weird" as a strategy isn't going to make a difference, but it clearly already has. The guy doesn't seem to have his finger on the pulse of the younger generations vote.
This. All
Of this.
He had a very bizarre and factional view of politics, trying to piss off your own party just for the sake of it
The guest seems really salty about her not picking Shapiro. He claims Walz is unknown... but so was Shapiro outside of PA...
That interviewee had no idea what he was talking about, he was just a salty partisan that provided no substantive arguments. Odd choice to include and definitely should've pushed back at at least some of what he was saying.
Really! He made total sense, think you’ve been watching too much CNN & MSNBC…a reason why we Americans today are in the situation we are in. Pathetic.
100% agree with jeremywilliams3196. And I don’t watch cnn or msnbc
@@ginalee813This is an Australian television show on an Australian network. What have CNN or MSNBC got to do with anything?
Suggesting that not picking shapiro is anti semitic is very irresponsible. Shapiro already has numerous scandals that have come to light, there's very genuine political reasons to not pick him
and intentional.
Planet America should be ashamed of this choice.
aside from his ability to win PA, he doesn’t bring anything to the table. not to mention, he can still work PA to help Harris and Walz win without being the actual VP pick. Something he has already started to do thankfully
Totally agree. Shapiro is very pro-Israel. Anyone on the left whos politically active knows that the mass murder underway in Gaza is a ‘base’ issue in this election. Harris needs to energise the base, not deflate it.
Picking Shapiro meant sowing discord inside the party on the horrific issue of Gaza. She didn’t need that division and she’s clever to avoid it. It has nothing whatsoever to do with Shapiro’s ethnicity.
Not to mention Harris's husband is JEWISH...
Better to bring in a Midwesterner who balances out the ticket. Everyone loves Walz, it was a good choice.
"One of the legends of Democratic politics" might not quite be enough viewer information. Perhaps also worth mentioning Penn's 6 years spent as CEO of the notorious Burson-Marsteller PR firm, or his consultancy company's work for clients like Texaco, Ford, BP, Merck, and McDonalds. Noteworthy too that he was forced to step down as Hilary Clinton's strategist after it emerged that his work at the same time for the Colombian gov on behalf of Burson-Marsteller was a conflict of interest. Penn was reportedly very divisive within the Clinton campaign team, and by 2018 was a Fox News regular, expressing concern that the Dems were moving too much to the left.
Well, that's exactly how he came off. Thanks for the insight.
Very strange interview, considering how much the trump camp seems to be floundering and upset by the walz pick. Seems like a very partisan interviewee
The political pundits who like to think they know everything, who were calling for Josh Shapiro to be VP hate this VP pick with a passion, particularly the right-wing democrats (who like to call themselves”moderates”) and former republicans.
The reality is that Harris has a problem on the left. The left of the Democratic Party don’t like her because of her politics. This interviewer mentioned her performance in the 2020 presidential primaries, where she was obviously courting the left of centre vote. This was because her record is very right wing - she would be very comfortable in the Australian Liberal Party under Peter Dutton. If Harris had gone with the picks that right wing pundits like this interviewer had preferred, she may well have alienated enough voters on the left of the Democratic Party (which is located at the political centre) that Harris may have lost the election with her VP pick.
I liked it. It shows the decision making and different sides within a party. Clearly this guy was disappointed but he didn't come across as partisan. Maybe a touch salty his horse didn't win the race.
The interview pretty accurately reflected my concerns about Walz. That is, before I saw him on stage and he blew me away.
@@SkandiaAUS you must have watched a different interview to the one I watched.
@@aidancampbell5644nah same. Just didn't get all worked up about it. That's where we differ 😁
Someone is a bit salty about Shapiro not getting picked 😂 bro your bias is showing 😅
Josh Shapiro had a very similar background to Harris except for ethnicity. So, it is good she picked someone who will represent rural America and is endorsed by both left and moderates. It is a win-win.
Really, that guy was the best you could get??
I'm Swedish. And for me the Democrats are too conservative for me. But as Trump is a danger to everyone I'm happy it seems Walz works fine and brings positivity
@@martinhumbleI think they are talking about Penn as the interviewee choice.
@@martinhumble I was talking about the interview with the guy that trotted out an antisemitic dog whistle and was wrong on every front.
I good with Walz too.
And I agree.
Americans think their center is the benchmark, I'd say it's to far to the right.
Chaz's obsession with RFK being brutally honest is hilarious. He clearly loved it when the bear story broke. It both reinforces RFKs honesty trait and the fact the craziest shit seems to happen around him.
28:46 C'mon guys, "PAW & ORDER" was right there!
19:08 VP’s are cancelled out? This guy is on whatever Trump is on
You need to post the video applauding Walz’ handling of the BLM riots, while talking, to U.S. governors. Walz is the perfect choice for V.P. & am a Pennsylvania resident who loves having Josh Shapiro as my governor. Harris-Walz 2024 🇺🇸
WTF was that interview 🤣🤣 holy hell…John Bannon strikes again 😆
Legendary strategies, my foot he has no idea. Tim Walz is completely completely energized even more a very excited Democratic Party and frankly a lot of Republicans too.
Being a pollster and chief strategist on a losing presidential campaign does not make Mark Penn "legendary". Bemoaning the fact that there'll be a united convention, attributing anti-semitism to Shapiro not being the running mate highlights this guy's real status as a Dem has-been. His only chance of future relevancy was Shapiro, hence his sour grapes.
Tim Walz is an excellent pick. Your guest doesn't know what he is talking about. Shapiro is not mad about not being picked by for Vice the President. So, let Democrats move forward for the pick. Vote for Kamala Harris for the President in November 2024 and Democrats.
💙💙💙💙💙💙
Ah yes, the "Some people are saying..." trope. Yawn.
Shapiro is not VP material. He still has alot to do in his own State. My pick was Walz & a few younger guys who didn't make the final list. The choice appears to be working out well so far. A down to earth guy rather than a business suit is what Dems need right now to win.
Millions of couches will vote for Walz
I love the Trump voice around 5:00 lol..
Ballz to the Walz
Harris Walz USA 🇺🇸
2:55 Jesus man what's with that spread
You boys could get James Carville on, I reckon he'd like you both. Cheers from Canberra
She is so cringe. I just can't
Abc going Fox News with that guest. No insights or analysis.
Why did Chas Licciardello have to leave the 'room' during the interview with Mark Penn? Has Mark Penn banned him? It was awkward and quite noticeable. Planet America 7/08/2024
He plays well as a counter to trump!
Ghee this isnt aging well
Trump is under 50% in Ohio so maybe walz was the better choice.
It's easy to dupe the American public regarding terms of military service. Only 1% of Americans serve on active duty and ~6% of Americans perform any service. I think only about 30% of young adults are qualified for service. Given all that, the specific terms used by service members or defined by the Department of Defense (DoD) is not necessarily what the average person would think.
Combat could mean service in a specific geographic area during a specific period of time as defined by DoD (for tax purposes*), sometime referred to as "In the box" or "down range" by service members of a certain age. It could also mean being in a combat engagement, being fired upon, firing at, hitting an IED, etc., an experience sometimes being awarded a combat service badge. This does not necessarily have to happen in a combat zone (I think), but it would make sense that it usually does.
War service for a service member is any work done under orders (written by the Dept of the Army/Navy/etc. and assigned the service member by name ) specifically stating the wartime operation of support., OEF, OIF, IFOR, SFOR, etc. For a guardsman or reservist, it will mean getting "Active Duty" orders. Those orders could station a person anywhere in the world to do that support mission. It could mean being sent to patrol streets in Bagdad, or it could mean going to Fort Anywhere in America to add personal for a task needing more people, or back filling a station so that the other personnel can go down range.
Rank at separation does not cancel the rank earned or served while on duty. Rank during duty can be the rank on the paycheck or, on occasion, be a "frocked" rank of one paygrade above what's on the paycheck. When a person has attended a rank by promotion but not held it for a specific time period before separation (time in grade - (TIG)), the retirement rank is a rank lower - or at least this is what it sounds like happened to Walz. The military branches will also do this when members transfer among active, reserve, and guard units. This retirement rank does nothing to discredit the fact that he achieved and served at a higher rank.
This is all sophistry and it will work well on an never-served audience who wants to hear it.
Equally, people use lay terms to denigrate J.D.'s combat service, and it is a disservice to J.D. and other veterans. It sounds to me that he was in a combat zone and that, to me, is combat. Whether it was his job to patrol or not, whether he had a combat specific job or not, he was in a combat zone and at higher risk of dying from enemy action. To be sure, he was carrying a loaded weapon and prepared to shot the enemy if engaged. He was at the same risk as a combat arms soldier of being ambushed, under rocket attack, or hitting an IED. Rockets and IEDs kill a lot of deployed personnel, many of them civilians, and I don't think anyone wants to claim that a Department of the Army civilian killed by a rocket did not serve in combat. You don't have to have a mission of movement to contact to be in danger in a combat zone. Saying that J.D. didn't serve in combat is wrong.
On the flip side, Walz served in a combat job, artillery, yet it sounds like he never fired a shot against the enemy, nor ever served with a combat arms unit in the combat zone. Conversely, J.D. had a combat service support job, but it was in a combat zone.
It's a whole lot of word play and to me it means far less than claiming to have grown up in a small town in the Midwest and truly having grown up in a small town in Nebraska vs claiming to have grown up in western Kentucky Appalachia and truly having grown up in the suburbs of western Ohio.
*serving one day of a month in combat zone makes the service member's pay for that month tax-free. As such, it is sought after by service members, and carefully defined by the service branches.
Hes name is Tim and hes nice he will do well and vaguely biden. Surface stuff.
Trump and Vance ARE weird.
The death of their successors?
Gosh Harris and the Americans in general are so beyond cringe, but I rather run with the prosecutor than the CRIMINAL.
Cringier that you see the cringe but you still gonna vote for them. All you bots are the same, no common sense, not open-minded and full of hate.
@@skwadkillerpubgmobile6243 Cringe is better than a paedophilic felon, but that's just me.
Artificially made criminal
😂 York Hunt smells
@@skwadkillerpubgmobile6243 🤣what? I’m Australian mate. It was a hypothetical comment. Rather loose a foot than live in the States.
Two I’d..ts with 🤡
And the full episode you still don't know what kamala's policies are. Hilarious out of touch you are.
Open borders, licences for illegal immigrants, tampons for schoolboys ...
Out of touch news
A show about racism…. Hmmmm. You have lost the plot
ABC duo is really stroking the Dem hot dog big time.
sez the incel who wishes he could stroke trump's
I wish main stream media would stop with their on sided democratic propaganda and give us honest news so those of us who are undecided can make an objective choice. The agreement to debate was not made with Kamala Harris it was made with Joe Biden and she knows that. It looks to me that she's the one who is afraid to debate trump and that's why she won't budge off the one that has a partisan moderator on a partisan news platform, where she would likely get the questions in advance.
Mainstream media spins Democratic propaganda. Kamala is running scared. FoxNews would be a much fairer moderator.
Clearly undecided and seeking objectivity.
@@gnarlypoop so leave...unless the deep state is forcing you to read this.
The stock market has crashed and this is the talking point
Sorry dude, the market had a correction, its on the up again.
A black lady and a jew on the ticket . do u think America woukld like that
9:08 I think you meant to say running on a Christian platform
Trump not even hnow' s his favor verse.he don't read the bible?
Well, semantics, I know, but NBC was wrong - she’s not African-American, she Jamaican-American.
Lots of African in them Jamaicans...Irie-mon!
Semantics would be when you have a point.
Kamala ain’t a real nigg@ like Trump! TRUMP 2024
She's an American of "mixed race" - Just like lots and lots of other Americans
Why are you guys being so weird about that? 😂😂😂
@@Donnah1979 Weird really is their thing, Good to see they're embracing it.
40k views and no comments? I sense censorship with this channel
6:26 gaslighting.
yeah its a good thing your comment was redacted eh ?
ABC have eliminated bots.
Nice guy who wants to steal children from their parents
Republicans, however, want to steal transgendered children from their parents, while forcing children to give birth and bring up children 🫠