She had good reason to believe that he would get away it. When he finally was supposed to have been arrested Jan 1, 1989 for domestic assault - there had been 8 previous police visits - and there had never been any consequences for him.
Lol, to each their own. I personally love it and find it hilarious. That family needs to be belittled in any way possible, even if it is something as benign as mispronouncing their name.
part of the danger of a narcissistic sociopath - he had a way of compartmentalizing it - "he made her do it" if you listen carefully to him -they argued - -all couples argue - Nicole had a "terrible temper" When he hit her car with the baseball bat - she said you are going to pay for that - he said I pay for everything - so he decided to go all out on it - it is all consistent with the narcissistic sociopath that he clearly is/was
No, the best book on this subject was Outrage by Vincent Bugliosi, followed by Murder in Brentwood by Mark Fuhrman. And Simpson is not an atypical murderer who has submerged his crimes into his subconscious. He's a narcissistic sociopath who not only knows he murdered Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman, but believes he was justified in doing so. He spent years trashing Nicole even after he murdered her. He probably still does.
What he found repugnant was that he no longer, in the years proceeding the murder trial, had the total adulation of the public that he enjoyed for so many years prior to 1994. I also don’t think that he found the act of murder against Nicole as repugnant on any level because he probably justified it and blamed her for pushing him to the breaking point.
The criminalist (Andrea Mazolla) put her initials on the blood swatches collected from the crime scene. When the swatches got to CellMark to identify who's DNA it was, none had initials on them. Vanatter booked only 6.5ccs of the 8ccs OJ gave to the LAPD on the 3th of June. Gary Segler of the coroners office testified in the civil trial Vanatter demanded and received the blood of the victims on the 15th of June. Collin Yamauchi testified in the criminal trial that he may have accidentally put OJ's blood on the Rockingham glove while propping the vial that spilled holding OJ's blood. Officer Kelly Muldorfer testified in the criminal trial that she was in the Bronco on the 16th of June and there was no blood in it. The blood on the back gate didn't appear until July 3rd. The blood on the socks didn't appear until August 16th. Fuhrman was pointing at one glove a whole hour before he goes to Rockingham to find the other glove. He doesn't point at any blood footprints, car keys, envelopes, a bloody beeper or the knit cap. What made the glove so special. A lot people don't even know that a light blue police evidence bag was found on OJ's neighbors property. Less than 5 feet away on the other side of the fence. Cochran submitted into evidence in February of 95. The diary used in the civil trial has since been debunked because Nicole supposedly was writing about events that would not occur for another 3 days based government records. The picture with OJ supposed wearing the Bruno Maglis was supposedly taken on Septempber 26th, 1993. Bills vs Dolphins. The game is on youtube. All the sportscasters are talking about is how it has been raining all weekend. When you look at the picture, it is sunny. The original pathologist that performed the autopsy stated that Ron was killed by two different types of knives. One single edged and double edged. The courts refuse to release the phone records of the victims. How can the murders occur at 10:15pm. If Ron is going to a club to party with friends that night and he leaves work at 9:55pm, how is he at Nicole's at 10:15. He goes home. 5 minutes He takes a shower 10 - 15 minutes Gets dressed 2 minutes Eats a salad 3 minutes. Go to Bundy 2 minutes I'm quite sure he called Nicole to tell her he was on his way. Goldman was at work for 7 hours. He didn't rush to leave and you expect me to believe when he got home he started doing a lot of running around.
@@josephswabe5584 Tom Lange and Phillip Vannater it’s on Amazon if you have a kindle. It’s an honest account from their point of view. They don’t sugar coat any mistakes made what they give is the reasons why they were made.
@@josephswabe5584 it was the prosecutor Marcia Clark who decided to go with the time line. Even though Lange and Vannatter told her it was wrong. They had a guy walking his dog who heard a guy shouting hey hey hey. Going on the guys time frame they think this was Ron Goldman coming across Nicole being attacked. And then taking in to account the woman car driver that saw OJ nearly taking her out and screaming at another driver who got in his way at a junction. And the time she gave and the the Limo driver who was waiting to pick him up and saw him walking from behind the bungalows across to the main house and the time he saw him. They told Marcia Clarke the murder was later than the time she said it was.
@@hotboy80baby18 was it his blood at the murder scene, or the victim’s blood at his house? Just curious 🧐 Kind of hard to explain the blood of someone you’ve never met, in your vehicle, and on your property.
@@bigdaddycool4242 because I have common sense and I've really watched and disected the whole trial, they got caught trying to frame oj and Johnnie cochran proved it at the end of the day....
Toobin was so far off in his analysis of OJ’s importance to his own defense that it makes me wonder what Toobin was doing during the trial. I think we found out years later. lol
For many years I believed everything I heard on the news on this topic. I thought Toobin was trustworthy but I’ve since learned (studying the entire case) Toobin is a greedy lying piece of shit. The entire media made obscene profits off OJ and that is why I believe they refuse to even consider the possibility of another killer. I believed every word the media told but not anymore!
Charlie is in denial himself considering that he got fired for his own inappropriate behavior. But great job by the writer for only giving the facts and leaving his personal opinion out of it. That's excellent journalism.
Was planted there...It had EDTA in it...Something that the body does not produce on it's own...And the Blood was only found there 3 weeks after the murder
It was all three of their blood in OJ bronco . Unless Ron and Nicole hitched a ride in the Bronco explain how it got there it had to have been transferred. As they were lying dead in the front yard they didn’t leave it in the Bronco.
Agreed! I read this book when it came out and don't remember a lot of specifics, but I do recall thinking it was filled with a fair amount of speculation and conjecture.
@@twinktoiletsbestfriendsmomscan Outrage by Vincent Bugliosi (on how he would have prosecuted the criminal trial) followed by Daniel Petrocelli's book Triumph of Justice (on he did prosecute and win the civil trial - the cross-examination of OJ Simpson alone is worth the read) were both favorites of mine. Murder in Brentwood by Mark Fuhrman is a good read. The books by Marcia Clark and Chris Darden aren't bad...once you get past the sour grapes. His Name is Ron by the Goldmans is a heartbreaker. Those are my picks. Thanks for asking.
Did their books mention these facts: The criminalist (Andrea Mazolla) put her initials on the blood swatches collected from the crime scene. When the swatches got to CellMark to identify who's DNA it was, none had initials on them. Vanatter booked only 6.5ccs of the 8ccs OJ gave to the LAPD on the 3th of June. Gary Segler of the coroners office testified in the civil trial Vanatter demanded and received the blood of the victims on the 15th of June. Collin Yamauchi testified in the criminal trial that he may have accidentally put OJ's blood on the Rockingham glove while propping the vial that spilled holding OJ's blood. Officer Kelly Muldorfer testified in the criminal trial that she was in the Bronco on the 16th of June and there was no blood in it. The blood on the back gate didn't appear until July 3rd. The blood on the socks didn't appear until August 16th. Fuhrman was pointing at one glove a whole hour before he goes to Rockingham to find the other glove. He doesn't point at any blood footprints, car keys, envelopes, a bloody beeper or the knit cap. What made the glove so special. A lot people don't even know that a light blue police evidence bag was found on OJ's neighbors property. Less than 5 feet away on the other side of the fence. Cochran submitted into evidence in February of 95. The diary used in the civil trial has since been debunked because Nicole supposedly was writing about events that would not occur for another 3 days based government records. The picture with OJ supposed wearing the Bruno Maglis was supposedly taken on Septempber 26th, 1993. Bills vs Dolphins. The game is on youtube. All the sportscasters are talking about is how it has been raining all weekend. When you look at the picture, it is sunny. The original pathologist that performed the autopsy stated that Ron was killed by two different types of knives. One single edged and double edged. The courts refuse to release the phone records of the victims. How can the murders occur at 10:15pm. If Ron is going to a club to party with friends that night and he leaves work at 9:55pm, how is he at Nicole's at 10:15. He goes home. 5 minutes He takes a shower 10 - 15 minutes Gets dressed 2 minutes Eats a salad 3 minutes. Go to Bundy 2 minutes I'm quite sure he called Nicole to tell her he was on his way. Goldman was at work for 7 hours. He didn't rush to leave and you expect me to believe when he got home he started doing a lot of running around.
@@deoglemnaco7025 Was your take pro guilt or pro planting of evidence? Or were you just making fun of the hundreds of people who wrote a book about this case, in which case I wrote a book too! A comic book.
@@deoglemnaco7025 Was just kidding that if I had ever written about this trial, it would have had to be a comic book. Over-the-top, cartoonish, and full of fantasy.
Ike Diamond yes I watched the trial. And I did DNA analysis at J&J and readcTHE DOUBLE HELIX....SCHECK OR SHYSTER BAmboozled them...even the two ignorant motors said they PSID the evidence no mind and based the decision on Furhman
@@twinktoiletsbestfriendsmomscan Na just the statement tbh I agree with him OJ valued his public image more than anything and here it was over and he was going jail he wanted to kill himself he even said he hated how they were talking about him on the media and news in the build up to the bronco chase and it pushed him over the edge along with the medicine he was taking ps the editing is terrible
Nicole predicted her own fate in writing and verbally topped off with ," He will get away with it". That's powerful.
She had good reason to believe that he would get away it. When he finally was supposed to have been arrested Jan 1, 1989 for domestic assault - there had been 8 previous police visits - and there had never been any consequences for him.
Per Carl Douglas, they did the redecoration and he said if OJ would have been hispanic he would have put up sombereros
It really bugs me when Rose pronounces Kardashian's name "Kadassian."
The interview with Johnny Cochran I realized it
The name wasn’t that popular back then.
@@SethMacLeod95 True.
Lol, to each their own. I personally love it and find it hilarious. That family needs to be belittled in any way possible, even if it is something as benign as mispronouncing their name.
That's fine. Robert Kardashian would be ashamed to see his kids turn to porn
Great interview. Looking forward to reading the book
i have never been hooked such a case. then the oj trial. there still unanswered questions.
I find it hard to believe OJ found that repugnant. He didn't find it repugnant to beat the crap out of Nicole all those times
huh was only 1 time
part of the danger of a narcissistic sociopath - he had a way of compartmentalizing it - "he made her do it" if you listen carefully to him -they argued - -all couples argue - Nicole had a "terrible temper" When he hit her car with the baseball bat - she said you are going to pay for that - he said I pay for everything - so he decided to go all out on it - it is all consistent with the narcissistic sociopath that he clearly is/was
@@riverdean7Not according to her diary.
@@blueberrycobbler she never had a diary
No, the best book on this subject was Outrage by Vincent Bugliosi, followed by Murder in Brentwood by Mark Fuhrman. And Simpson is not an atypical murderer who has submerged his crimes into his subconscious. He's a narcissistic sociopath who not only knows he murdered Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman, but believes he was justified in doing so. He spent years trashing Nicole even after he murdered her. He probably still does.
@@camoyscommercialcleaning8115 YOU STFU! Unlike you, I can cite actual evidence proving Simpson's guilt.
Actually, the best book on this is “Evidence Dismissed” by Dan Moldea.
@@bigdaddycool4242 what’s Lange theory on what happened that night based on the gate
@@kingdomofanimaria
Read the book.
@@bigdaddycool4242 don’t have time unfortunately
What he found repugnant was that he no longer, in the years proceeding the murder trial, had the total adulation of the public that he enjoyed for so many years prior to 1994. I also don’t think that he found the act of murder against Nicole as repugnant on any level because he probably justified it and blamed her for pushing him to the breaking point.
This guy is a master manipulator.
charlies does amazing interviews. to bad he is gone now.
The criminalist (Andrea Mazolla) put her initials on the blood swatches collected from the crime scene. When the swatches got to CellMark to identify who's DNA it was, none had initials on them. Vanatter booked only 6.5ccs of the 8ccs OJ gave to the LAPD on the 3th of June. Gary Segler of the coroners office testified in the civil trial Vanatter demanded and received the blood of the victims on the 15th of June.
Collin Yamauchi testified in the criminal trial that he may have accidentally put OJ's blood on the Rockingham glove while propping the vial that spilled holding OJ's blood.
Officer Kelly Muldorfer testified in the criminal trial that she was in the Bronco on the 16th of June and there was no blood in it.
The blood on the back gate didn't appear until July 3rd. The blood on the socks didn't appear until August 16th.
Fuhrman was pointing at one glove a whole hour before he goes to Rockingham to find the other glove. He doesn't point at any blood footprints, car keys, envelopes, a bloody beeper or the knit cap. What made the glove so special. A lot people don't even know that a light blue police evidence bag was found on OJ's neighbors property. Less than 5 feet away on the other side of the fence. Cochran submitted into evidence in February of 95.
The diary used in the civil trial has since been debunked because Nicole supposedly was writing about events that would not occur for another 3 days based government records.
The picture with OJ supposed wearing the Bruno Maglis was supposedly taken on Septempber 26th, 1993. Bills vs Dolphins. The game is on youtube. All the sportscasters are talking about is how it has been raining all weekend. When you look at the picture, it is sunny.
The original pathologist that performed the autopsy stated that Ron was killed by two different types of knives. One single edged and double edged.
The courts refuse to release the phone records of the victims.
How can the murders occur at 10:15pm. If Ron is going to a club to party with friends that night and he leaves work at 9:55pm, how is he at Nicole's at 10:15.
He goes home. 5 minutes
He takes a shower 10 - 15 minutes
Gets dressed 2 minutes
Eats a salad 3 minutes.
Go to Bundy 2 minutes
I'm quite sure he called Nicole to tell her he was on his way.
Goldman was at work for 7 hours. He didn't rush to leave and you expect me to believe when he got home he started doing a lot of running around.
Read Body of Evidence that will give you the correct time lines and what was used In the civil case that wax the used in the first trial .
@@ellenlyons4090 Who is it by?
@@josephswabe5584 Tom Lange and Phillip Vannater it’s on Amazon if you have a kindle. It’s an honest account from their point of view. They don’t sugar coat any mistakes made what they give is the reasons why they were made.
@@ellenlyons4090 Your talking about Evidence Dismissed. They agree with the Defenses time line which means OJ could not have done it.
@@josephswabe5584 it was the prosecutor Marcia Clark who decided to go with the time line. Even though Lange and Vannatter told her it was wrong. They had a guy walking his dog who heard a guy shouting hey hey hey. Going on the guys time frame they think this was Ron Goldman coming across Nicole being attacked. And then taking in to account the woman car driver that saw OJ nearly taking her out and screaming at another driver who got in his way at a junction. And the time she gave and the the Limo driver who was waiting to pick him up and saw him walking from behind the bungalows across to the main house and the time he saw him. They told Marcia Clarke the murder was later than the time she said it was.
he did it period
@
Yes
@@bigdaddycool4242 no he didn't
@@hotboy80baby18 and what leads you to believe he didn’t?
@@hotboy80baby18 was it his blood at the murder scene, or the victim’s blood at his house? Just curious 🧐
Kind of hard to explain the blood of someone you’ve never met, in your vehicle, and on your property.
@@bigdaddycool4242 because I have common sense and I've really watched and disected the whole trial, they got caught trying to frame oj and Johnnie cochran proved it at the end of the day....
Toobin was so far off in his analysis of OJ’s importance to his own defense that it makes me wonder what Toobin was doing during the trial. I think we found out years later. lol
For many years I believed everything I heard on the news on this topic. I thought Toobin was trustworthy but I’ve since learned (studying the entire case) Toobin is a greedy lying piece of shit. The entire media made obscene profits off OJ and that is why I believe they refuse to even consider the possibility of another killer. I believed every word the media told but not anymore!
the best book on the trial of the century along with OUTRAGE by VINCENT BUGLIOSI.
Charlie is in denial himself considering that he got fired for his own inappropriate behavior. But great job by the writer for only giving the facts and leaving his personal opinion out of it. That's excellent journalism.
What was their excuse for Ron Goldman's blood being in his Bronco?
Was planted there...It had EDTA in it...Something that the body does not produce on it's own...And the Blood was only found there 3 weeks after the murder
It was all three of their blood in OJ bronco . Unless Ron and Nicole hitched a ride in the Bronco explain how it got there it had to have been transferred. As they were lying dead in the front yard they didn’t leave it in the Bronco.
@@proudlysouthafrican4368 Not true, of course.
Ron and Nicole’s blood was in the Bronco bc Ron and Nicole’s blood was on OJ. When OJ got back into the Bronco, that’s how it got there
Spouse abuse doesn’t lead to murder ?? Is he nuts
Going to buy his book
*27:16** "OJ doesn't know in his own mind that he did this crime." I really thought this guy was smart and interesting until I got to this part.*
Agreed! I read this book when it came out and don't remember a lot of specifics, but I do recall thinking it was filled with a fair amount of speculation and conjecture.
@@riverebec1 sounds consistent with this interview. Of all the books written about OJ, may I ask if you have any recommendations?
@@twinktoiletsbestfriendsmomscan Outrage by Vincent Bugliosi (on how he would have prosecuted the criminal trial) followed by Daniel Petrocelli's book Triumph of Justice (on he did prosecute and win the civil trial - the cross-examination of OJ Simpson alone is worth the read) were both favorites of mine. Murder in Brentwood by Mark Fuhrman is a good read. The books by Marcia Clark and Chris Darden aren't bad...once you get past the sour grapes. His Name is Ron by the Goldmans is a heartbreaker. Those are my picks. Thanks for asking.
@@riverebec1 Wow. Amazing. Great minds think alike. The Bugliosi book is actually at the top of my list. Thank you so much for sharing, my friend.
@@twinktoiletsbestfriendsmomscan Thanks again for asking.
27 tapes. there is no time to edit 27 tapes.
Anything to make some money schiller.
Blood samples can be planted somehow, but a timeline can not be created. So O J did not or could not do it!
19:30 the 2 witnesses walked past at 10.25 not 10.35-40
What an honest guy - you have to take your hat off 4 that
Last year? Uhh that was 25 years ago lol
27
28
countless books were written, but Schillers book is far and away the best. Toobins was the second.
Did their books mention these facts:
The criminalist (Andrea Mazolla) put her initials on the blood swatches collected from the crime scene. When the swatches got to CellMark to identify who's DNA it was, none had initials on them. Vanatter booked only 6.5ccs of the 8ccs OJ gave to the LAPD on the 3th of June. Gary Segler of the coroners office testified in the civil trial Vanatter demanded and received the blood of the victims on the 15th of June.
Collin Yamauchi testified in the criminal trial that he may have accidentally put OJ's blood on the Rockingham glove while propping the vial that spilled holding OJ's blood.
Officer Kelly Muldorfer testified in the criminal trial that she was in the Bronco on the 16th of June and there was no blood in it.
The blood on the back gate didn't appear until July 3rd. The blood on the socks didn't appear until August 16th.
Fuhrman was pointing at one glove a whole hour before he goes to Rockingham to find the other glove. He doesn't point at any blood footprints, car keys, envelopes, a bloody beeper or the knit cap. What made the glove so special. A lot people don't even know that a light blue police evidence bag was found on OJ's neighbors property. Less than 5 feet away on the other side of the fence. Cochran submitted into evidence in February of 95.
The diary used in the civil trial has since been debunked because Nicole supposedly was writing about events that would not occur for another 3 days based government records.
The picture with OJ supposed wearing the Bruno Maglis was supposedly taken on Septempber 26th, 1993. Bills vs Dolphins. The game is on youtube. All the sportscasters are talking about is how it has been raining all weekend. When you look at the picture, it is sunny.
The original pathologist that performed the autopsy stated that Ron was killed by two different types of knives. One single edged and double edged.
The courts refuse to release the phone records of the victims.
How can the murders occur at 10:15pm. If Ron is going to a club to party with friends that night and he leaves work at 9:55pm, how is he at Nicole's at 10:15.
He goes home. 5 minutes
He takes a shower 10 - 15 minutes
Gets dressed 2 minutes
Eats a salad 3 minutes.
Go to Bundy 2 minutes
I'm quite sure he called Nicole to tell her he was on his way.
Goldman was at work for 7 hours. He didn't rush to leave and you expect me to believe when he got home he started doing a lot of running around.
How do you feel about Bugliosi's book?
@@twinktoiletsbestfriendsmomscan Damn good I would rate it third.
Excellent book
I wrote a book myself!
Seriously, I mean about this case? Was it pro or plant?
@@riverebec1 huh?
@@deoglemnaco7025 Was your take pro guilt or pro planting of evidence? Or were you just making fun of the hundreds of people who wrote a book about this case, in which case I wrote a book too! A comic book.
@@riverebec1 what was your comic
@@deoglemnaco7025 Was just kidding that if I had ever written about this trial, it would have had to be a comic book. Over-the-top, cartoonish, and full of fantasy.
Charlie Rose slants negative and condescending... Schiller asserts Norman Rockwell painting and Rose barks "poster or whatever". Cornball ass
Ike Diamond yes I watched the trial. And I did DNA analysis at J&J and readcTHE DOUBLE HELIX....SCHECK OR SHYSTER BAmboozled them...even the two ignorant motors said they PSID the evidence no mind and based the decision on Furhman
Too many oddities that fail to add up to convict OJ
This was first person who made ant sense at all about the OJ Simpson trial. Now I've got to get the book.
He is doing a lot of lying in this video.
Nicholas shreck
24:51
Are you referencing the terrible edit?
@@twinktoiletsbestfriendsmomscan Na just the statement tbh I agree with him OJ valued his public image more than anything and here it was over and he was going jail he wanted to kill himself he even said he hated how they were talking about him on the media and news in the build up to the bronco chase and it pushed him over the edge along with the medicine he was taking ps the editing is terrible
I don't care what anyone says. The bastar* did it.
I can't believe this guy. I don't want any of his books....
Why does shiller have all the insides of from jfk to charles manson ..oj i dont believe shiller government stooge
Well at least he was acquitted and justice was done!
Are these people Stupid? The blood had EDTA in it meaning it came out of a Blood tube not Simpson body on the Night of the Murders.
OJ is misunderstood