Sovereign Citizen Held In Contempt Of Court And Follow Up Appearance
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 фев 2024
- A sovereign citizen argues jursidiction and is held in contempt plus his follow up hearing.
Source videos -
Part 1 - Not avalible
Part 2 - ruclips.net/user/live4zM3-qTu...
Discord - / discord
Twitter: / marc978
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @marcbaggett1
PayPal -
www.paypal.com/paypalme/marcb...
Thank you to my channel members!!!
#SovereignCitizenMovement #SovereignCitizen #SovereignCitzenCourtFail
___________________________________________________________________________________
Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. - Развлечения
Drinking and boating and then playing the sovereign citizen game makes him extra douchey. And trying to hide behind native American tribal law to claim he's not within the court's jurisdiction is just 💩 sprinkles on top. I absolutely despise sovereign citizens...🤬
I can't wait until I'm old enough to retire, and have enough free time to be this dumb. 😂
I retired over ten years ago and have very little free time.
A little knowledge is dangerous and he has very little knowledge
🤣🤣🤣
A good Attorney would be saying to the Judge ''Hey you get off a McCloud.''
I see what you did there 😊
Or a great attorney
Ahoy, mateys! Admiralty Court is now in session 😂😂😂
This guy gives off major Phil Spector vibes. Yikes.
Phil Spector….wasn’t he a hot mess 😖
This judge leads by example of respect off law And staying calm Kudos to him
There's no such thing as "special appearance" in court. No one coming to court is special above others.
They literally are adults who think that magic words work.
There are, however specious appearances.
By 5 minutes in, the judge should've said "you don't understand common language so I'm ruling that you cannot represent yourself, next case". These judges need to stop wasting time and tax payer dollars on these assholes.
"Do you not understand what 3 years is??" LOL!!! Woohoo, Judge Gauthier!! I agree with you, Marc - his "buddy" should have been held in contempt and removed from the court room. I couldn't be a judge - I have no patience for stupidity, especially for when it's just the sake of it. I'd be the judge with "that" reputation... 😏😁
Just because he doesn’t like the answers he gets doesn’t mean he didn’t get any answers…..
The definition of stupidity looks a lot like insanity.
Amazing how a bit of jail time can reshape a person's demeanor. Therapeutic
Jailed for contempt, that’s showing hm proof of jurisdiction….
They always bring up that "jurisdiction" nonsense. Jursidiction asserted is assumed, if the defendant wants to challenge it, he or she has to bring it up by motion prior to trial.
Yes! You too can be the Defendant who takes over the courtroom and shows the "Judge" how to do things properly! So join the esteemed alumni of Trust Me Bro Law College ® © ™ ℗ (*we've got your buck*)
I don't contempt to consent! (or something like that.)
I'd bet the boating thing is actually WHY he isn't mentioning maritime law. Anyone with a brain knows that their ideas about jurisdiction are ridiculous entirely, but they usually acknowledge that maritime law IS an allowed jurisdiction under the constitution (and argue it doesn't apply because they are on the land) so if he did even the ridiculous sov cit arguments would fall apart.
"I reserve all my rights."
That statement means absolutely nothing. Since when does anyone willfully give up their rights?
People waive their rights ALL the time.
@@leetakamiya Only in the case of making a decision between a trial jury or a bench trial, or going pro se rather than retaining a lawyer. Regardless, the judicial system bends over backwards to ensure that the rights of the accused are not violated. Therefore, making a statement that you reserve all your rights is less than useless.
@@billyyank2198 Actually., all I was doing was giving an honest and correct answer to your question.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but because it's boat charges, doesn't he fall under Admiralty law?