@That other Guy It might be a problem, but there is solution for everything. Probably with some clever engineering they should not interfere with each other.
It’s neither reversing the moves (you can see they’re not the same at the beginning and end) or solving it in a minimal number of moves (it takes more moves to solve).
it looks like it's using some of the standard rubik's cube solving algorithms - you can see it solve first a 2x2x2 section, then 2x2x3, 2x3x3, then finish
@@wkern2121 I suspect K-JeLL is correct. I don't know myself as I did not create this or have any knowledge beyond the videos the creator has uploaded.
Running it on a table, he had to watch it to keep it from falling off. (And the motors slowed down when they lifted the cube.) Solved by updraft levitation!
This is insanely cool! Amazing! How is it levitating btw? A superconductor somewhere below the table and the magnets of the rotor inside the cube making it levitate or is there another mechanism involved? Please do reply, would love to know how it's levitating.
@@xcavinps4539 It's definitely not hanging by the wire, the servos clearly have the torque to make the entire cube swing. It wouldn't be staying in place like that if it was on strings. The only place a string could be attached to is the top middle panel, which is turned when the top layer rotates. Every time the top panel moves, the string is twisted, and then the whole cube should slowly rotate to follow. Plus when he sets it up in the beginning, the string would be a pain in the ass to edit out because you can see his hands move behind the area where the string would be. Not to mention his hands are focused toward the bottom, where a string would be hooked on at the top. A superconductor is the more likely solution. It's not CGI either unless the creator is an absolute genius with CGI. All the shadows and lighting is consistent, even down to the light bouncing underneath the arm. Plus, the motors running the sides of the cube hit a corner and click every now and then, which isn't something most people would account for when making a fake CGI video.
A neat coincidence allows this to be hung on fishing line. For a human solving a cube, it would be impossible to vertically rotate the middle column - holding bold sides still while moving the middle would generally require three hands. But it's one of the first things I thought this cube might do because it's suspended in space and now "anything is possible". Then I realized that it was dangling from a fishing line connected to the middle block, making this move impossible (even if the motors could simultaneously rotate both sides at once, which might be possible and would be cool to see). However, because humans do not generally use such a maneuver to solve a cube, this isn't the end of the world.
Actually, many cubers use the center column moves by holding the left and right sides, and using a finger to rotate the middle layer. So you don’t exactly need three hands.
@@conscious5122 But there are way more efficient "formulas" it can use, especially if it's not subject to the limitations of a human brain or human hands
So i am wondering. Is it really self-solving, or is it just a pattern that is always done and then undone when it is solved? Kind of like a wind up toy.
Obviously equipped with spin servos. But does it simply reverse the mixing order from a memory stack, or does it actually use "colour" sensors and algorithm to "solve"? And is the processing handled by components inside the cube or by wireless commands from another machine?
I'd think it's just reversing the order, that's the simplest and most obvious way to make a self-solving rubik's cube. Although in theory, it shouldn't be hard to make an AI that would solve a rubik's cube, since it's all based on patterns and getting certain squares into a particular position.
@@corellioncrusaderproductio4679 You don't even need AI. People have been solving these cubes (surprisingly fast) with known algorithms since their introduction to market. It's even been mathematically proven that methodically aligning the cube segments through logical brute force often requires fewer "moves" than exactly reversing the mixing order.
@@pwnmeisterage That's true, but the designer most likely didn't design the cube with the most efficient path in mind. The AI would be used to determine which algorithm is most efficient before beginning the solve. It's the bridge between your algorithms and the physical positions of the corners/edges/faces. without an AI, the only thing a self-solving cube could do, is reverse the order.
@@corellioncrusaderproductio4679 What I was getting at is that AI is good for solving problems and for finding solutions to problems which seem too complex to solve. But Rubik's cubes are an old problem with an old solution, we already know the (mathematically proven) quickest and best ways to solve them, we can program those instructions ourselves, we don't need to implement and educate an AI which can learn other answers.
@@pwnmeisterage Well, the whole idea of a self-solving rubik's cube is just a novelty. anyone could solve it with a little bit of a research online and some patience. This creation isn't doing anything that a human couldn't do themselves, but it's more "what if a rubik's cube solved itself?" If you program those algorithms into the rubik's cube, is it not an AI that determines which algorithm to use based on the input (the location of each part of the cube)?
Why does it take over 70 moves to reverse what only took 9 moves to scramble? It must be going through a complex set of algorithms to fix one block at a time. I used to have a book that described this process, and in fact wrote a computer program (back in my 1980 computer class) based on that book that would tell you how to solve your scrambled cube (providing you could input the colors of all the tiles accurately, which took for bloody ever). Anyway, seeing how this cube was being solved made me think it was using that same move list, solving one layer at a time. I think REVERSING the moves you made would be easier, but maybe the creators know something I don't. Maybe they felt that was cheating or something.
1985: we will have flying cars in 2015.
2019: flying rubiks cubes.
well, actually, first flying cars appeared in the 1950s if not earlier, with the first prototypes going back to the 1930s ... but well ...
at the shop, of course
dadautube sources ? Dont worry bro .
@@dadautube Copy and Paste Google lmao
Quote from "Back to the Future"
Guys he has a controller
とんでもない
So when can I buy it?
i really wanna buy this too!
Same!!!
same to
I want I want
NEVER
How cool would it be if it starts levitating just before it starts solving it then stops levitating once it completes the solve :O
That will happen if there is a jet impact mechanism it's simply levitating because of magnetic force
If it's using electromagnets you can turn them off/on
@That other Guy It might be a problem, but there is solution for everything. Probably with some clever engineering they should not interfere with each other.
Lol
Starting the levitation may not be possible, but dropping the cube at the end, why not?
沢山プログラミングや機会などの工作をしてきた私から言わせてもらうと、空が綺麗ですね。
この雲の形が絶妙ですよね
長年空を見続けてきた気象予報士の私から言わせてもらうと、このルービックキューブはシャッフルされた手順を遡っていますね。
Have you ever wanted a ghost to solve your pesky Rubik's Cubes?
Its a friend
Uhhhh... Dude... This is the... MOST AMAZING AND GROUNDBREAKING INVENTION I HAVE EVER SEEN! Thank you SO MUCH for making this a thing!
But the Rubix cube is floating how is it ground breaking
r/technicallythetruth
@@petterdin1834 ITS RUBIKS NOT RUBIX
@@mceddie9701 I'm not the smartest, sadly
@@petterdin1834 Oh well then i am sorr y
Something about the cube's isolation makes this so entrancing and relaxing.
Mom: What are you watching
Me: Just a floating rubiks cube solving itself
Alguien viene de Un Poco De Todo??
Auto like para no desaparecer
Yo
SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!!!
I DONT CARE I LOVE IT I DONT CCCAAARREEE
"Hi guys my name is Human Controller"
* Makes video of self - controlling Rubix Cube*
How do I start non floating Rubix Cubes I purchased
Fake, the gravity was a paid actor smh
They could have made the floating with strong magnets, but that would have been more unstable so i don't know how TF they did
@@the_local_gamer1729 not only unstable. It would interfere with the motors inside..
Is it simply reversing the moves that it "remembered" or is it truly solving it in a minimal number of moves?
Really happy i didnt have to type this out. Going to though cause it doesnt seem like its all there to be self solving
It’s neither reversing the moves (you can see they’re not the same at the beginning and end) or solving it in a minimal number of moves (it takes more moves to solve).
It's using algorithms; you can see if you look closely
it looks like it's using some of the standard rubik's cube solving algorithms - you can see it solve first a 2x2x2 section, then 2x2x3, 2x3x3, then finish
Real robots don't use CFOP.
Or non-optimal PLL algs. The 2-gen U perm is optimized for human hands to execute, there's no reason for a robot to use it.
I’d rather see a robot use CFOP than undoing the scramble
Sorry, I don't speak code.
@@ugotrektdude824 Do you speak Google, though?
ruwix.com/the-rubiks-cube/advanced-cfop-fridrich/
I saw an algorithm that solve a rubik in less than 20 moves
also a really awesome demonstration of inertia in fricionless environments..
Just when I thought this was as cool as it could get, now it levitates! Amazing work :D
Ian Grams how do you start the cube please
Wayne Kern i think it starts when it wasnt changed for a few seconds
@@wkern2121 I suspect K-JeLL is correct. I don't know myself as I did not create this or have any knowledge beyond the videos the creator has uploaded.
Amazing. Flipping Levitates. Good Job.🏆🎁👍🏻
It’s an air vent or string that’s hanging it tho
Running it on a table, he had to watch it to keep it from falling off. (And the motors slowed down when they lifted the cube.) Solved by updraft levitation!
なぜ浮く
磁石か？
This Rubik’s cube is *not* floating it is clearly faked with strings
This is one of the best RUclips videos I've ever seen.
This is insanely cool! Amazing!
How is it levitating btw? A superconductor somewhere below the table and the magnets of the rotor inside the cube making it levitate or is there another mechanism involved? Please do reply, would love to know how it's levitating.
Superconductor!
I think it might be hanging from a piece of fishing line
Is this even real lol?
@@xcavinps4539 It's definitely not hanging by the wire, the servos clearly have the torque to make the entire cube swing. It wouldn't be staying in place like that if it was on strings. The only place a string could be attached to is the top middle panel, which is turned when the top layer rotates. Every time the top panel moves, the string is twisted, and then the whole cube should slowly rotate to follow. Plus when he sets it up in the beginning, the string would be a pain in the ass to edit out because you can see his hands move behind the area where the string would be. Not to mention his hands are focused toward the bottom, where a string would be hooked on at the top. A superconductor is the more likely solution.
It's not CGI either unless the creator is an absolute genius with CGI. All the shadows and lighting is consistent, even down to the light bouncing underneath the arm. Plus, the motors running the sides of the cube hit a corner and click every now and then, which isn't something most people would account for when making a fake CGI video.
この人絶対元スパイやん…
Wow... this is absolutely amazing 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
このチープなモーター音がいい味出してる。なんか、近未来だなぁ〜
あと、日本人いますか？
w
いる
はーい
We are not going to talk about Newton's 3rd law of motion?
That's brilliant. You're so talented
これは…手動の動きを記憶して逆再生してるだけなのか、自ら原点復帰の最小手を計算して動いてるのか？
前者だと記憶できるのが何手までなのかな？後者だとメッチャ凄すぎるんだけど、商品化されてないということはおそらく前者なのかな？記憶できる数にも限りがあるんだろうなぁ。
ルービックキューブの解き方は意外と単純な公式で具現できますのであえて逆再生のようなダサい方法は使わないと思います。実際、この動画でも手で回す回数とキューブが自ら回る回数が異なっています。
おぉッ！ということは商品化しないのはコストの問題なのかなぁ？
Dark Magical Science
A neat coincidence allows this to be hung on fishing line. For a human solving a cube, it would be impossible to vertically rotate the middle column - holding bold sides still while moving the middle would generally require three hands. But it's one of the first things I thought this cube might do because it's suspended in space and now "anything is possible". Then I realized that it was dangling from a fishing line connected to the middle block, making this move impossible (even if the motors could simultaneously rotate both sides at once, which might be possible and would be cool to see). However, because humans do not generally use such a maneuver to solve a cube, this isn't the end of the world.
Actually, many cubers use the center column moves by holding the left and right sides, and using a finger to rotate the middle layer. So you don’t exactly need three hands.
I think it can be used for scared someone 😜😜
How or where can I speak to you directly? I don't want to buy this but rather improve something with you if you allow me
Why does it take over 60 moves to solve itself after a human has only shuffled it with around 9 moves?
It doesn't undo the moves, but rather puts it in a formula to solve any cube
@@conscious5122 But there are way more efficient "formulas" it can use, especially if it's not subject to the limitations of a human brain or human hands
@@ssrc It could just do the 9 moves back to be the most efficient. This is just for a showcase.
@@kevinroyfr That is cheating.
The Cube that Solves Itself has Experienced Gravity, and a Case of Wingardium Leviosa.
The guy who invented the rubix cube just turned in his grave
Hes still very much alive at the age of 76
@@guyinatank5929 oh wow
Hey it's nothing but just a reverse mechanism coded there
Not at all ! It's a random scramble and its solved by CFOP technique !
Does it reverse the moves or does it do CFOP, it looks like it does CFOP
CFOP
That is much more impressive than just reversing moves. Good job!
@@aalim-kn6lq That would be cheating.
Nicely done.
I think the cube is floating due to magnetism levitation
Wingardium Leviosa
This is cooler than cool.
How the hell is it floating
I have the impression that he is suffering
one does not simply awesome... except THIS one ;)
We want an actual product now.
It's Totally fake
How much for it???
Mind blown. 🤯
How has this video not blown up yet?
nice editing
1004: we will have flying cars in 2021 or 2019 or 2020!
2021: flying Rubiks cubes no flying cars ;)
this is amazing.
I want to buy it ))
This is a camera trick....otherwise this guy would have marketed it to the worldwide magic community long ago. Millions there.
they say flying cars by 2030
I say we are improving - floating rubiks cube
OK, this guy is an alien and he is here to take control of the planet... Any resistance is futile.
Hot news sent me here 🧐
This went straight to my absolute favourites all by itself
LOL
Is he using some super conductor to make it float? Or am I just stupid and he is using a string?
Maybe magnets 🤔😃😃😃
Yes.
u r god
ONE thumb down.. Who does this guy think he is.
daniel berrett ?
What are you talking about
Holy hell this thing is cool!
Is there a public file where we can see how to make this?
I just- uh- woaw. Future is now.
WOW! You used a fan and / or magnets! But still this is pretty cool.
Im confused.. its not using CFOP, but it did a U-Perm at the end..?
I thought it would memorize the shuffle and do it backwards but it took an even longer path...
that's good, otherwise the program would be way more simple and it's wouldn't be as cool
Behind the magic solving rucks cube:
awesome
*you: mom. can i have a rubiks cube?* *Mom: no. we have one at home.* *the rubiks cube:*
This needs way more likes
This looks so funny and unreal
Thats cyberpunk 2077 rubix cube
Technology gets better everyday
How does it know what the colors are?
It would be good to see diferente levels of Cuber race it to see what speed of cuber it will beat
i m gonna convince so many people that i am a Jedi
Of course he attached it to a string.
Fake. People can't fly that high in the air.
Seriously, can I buy one from you?
So i am wondering. Is it really self-solving, or is it just a pattern that is always done and then undone when it is solved? Kind of like a wind up toy.
It seems that it uses CFOP method to get solved, so the method that most speedcubers use when they solve some random scrambled cube.
El futuro es hoy oíste viejo
Obviously equipped with spin servos. But does it simply reverse the mixing order from a memory stack, or does it actually use "colour" sensors and algorithm to "solve"? And is the processing handled by components inside the cube or by wireless commands from another machine?
I'd think it's just reversing the order, that's the simplest and most obvious way to make a self-solving rubik's cube. Although in theory, it shouldn't be hard to make an AI that would solve a rubik's cube, since it's all based on patterns and getting certain squares into a particular position.
@@corellioncrusaderproductio4679 You don't even need AI. People have been solving these cubes (surprisingly fast) with known algorithms since their introduction to market. It's even been mathematically proven that methodically aligning the cube segments through logical brute force often requires fewer "moves" than exactly reversing the mixing order.
@@pwnmeisterage That's true, but the designer most likely didn't design the cube with the most efficient path in mind. The AI would be used to determine which algorithm is most efficient before beginning the solve. It's the bridge between your algorithms and the physical positions of the corners/edges/faces. without an AI, the only thing a self-solving cube could do, is reverse the order.
@@corellioncrusaderproductio4679 What I was getting at is that AI is good for solving problems and for finding solutions to problems which seem too complex to solve. But Rubik's cubes are an old problem with an old solution, we already know the (mathematically proven) quickest and best ways to solve them, we can program those instructions ourselves, we don't need to implement and educate an AI which can learn other answers.
@@pwnmeisterage Well, the whole idea of a self-solving rubik's cube is just a novelty. anyone could solve it with a little bit of a research online and some patience. This creation isn't doing anything that a human couldn't do themselves, but it's more "what if a rubik's cube solved itself?"
If you program those algorithms into the rubik's cube, is it not an AI that determines which algorithm to use based on the input (the location of each part of the cube)?
So can I buy one?
Like si vienes de Un Poco De Todo UPDT ;)
How did u make it float?
Now this is amazing
love it, beautifull work
maybe a ghost cube version would be amazing too
No is a mechanism.. is secretly a ghost
yea this is way more better than flying cars
Офигеть хочу себе такой!
Is it for sale
Cyberpunk 2077 intensifies
The cube as ascended.
Why does it take over 70 moves to reverse what only took 9 moves to scramble? It must be going through a complex set of algorithms to fix one block at a time. I used to have a book that described this process, and in fact wrote a computer program (back in my 1980 computer class) based on that book that would tell you how to solve your scrambled cube (providing you could input the colors of all the tiles accurately, which took for bloody ever). Anyway, seeing how this cube was being solved made me think it was using that same move list, solving one layer at a time.
I think REVERSING the moves you made would be easier, but maybe the creators know something I don't. Maybe they felt that was cheating or something.
I thought reverse procedure was not solving.
Now just add white smoke and led
This is so cool, if it is real, which I hope it is.
@Light Or maybe the core is made up of Superconductor stuff ! They have that levitating ability
For each move a mouse ceases to exist.