I remember seeing this in the theatre and in the scene where they saw them I had tears in my eyes at the thought that seeing a live dinosaur at their height would be an incredible experience. Of course we might not be here if large dinos were still around. Fortunately most modern dinosaurs are small.
40,000 year old permafrost worm found in Russia came back to life and reproduced. Horse found in permafrost still had blood in it. As permafrost in northern Canada and Russia melts and exposes more and more frozen in time animals who knows what we find. The ethical choice to bring back extinct animals for our enjoyment , not their best interest seems straight forward though.. its not like we would release them into the wild as well..
He was drunk as a mother when he did the first two JP films. He would often intentionally give less effort in his roles just to piss of the directors, and he would get so drunk that most of his scenes would have to be edited so you could hear his voice properly. I'm not sure every director has the patience to deal with him, Especially documentary directors.
Jurassic Park is my all time favourite movie. I still remember seeing it in 1993. I was pregnant a the time and the baby kept on jumping in my stomach every time I got excited. In all I guess I saw the movie about 30 times. It's so sad that Michael Crichton died. He was a great writer. Bob Baker and Jack Horner are the pioneers of dinosaur research, I would surely like to meet them . Spielberg made a great movie.
Yeah... if you're a fan of T-rexes then you won't like Jack Horner. He is the one that thinks the T-rex was a little weakling that could never hunt for itself and had to scavenge everything. Oh Yeah, and he's responsible for the "spinosaurus" shown in JP///
I had this documentary in VHS format, I was around 3 years old when this came to my place with the Making of jurassic Park and the movie itself... Watching this makes me think the technology in that time was so developed that amused me... Now I still amused because we improved that technology and the concept of life and discovers...
I grew up watching Jurassic Park, I was 5 when I first saw it and I still love watching it, even at 34 years old. I never stopped loving those movies. That's where my love of giant lizards came from. First it was Jurassic Park, then it was Dragonheart and then Godzilla n 98. Had it not been for Jurassic Park, I probably wouldn't have watched the other two movies. This was a big part of my childhood.
You can hear Chriton's labored breathing from the cancer in these clips...... Poor dude lived a stressful life and battled cancer for a LONG time. I wish he was still here after the second movie, so he could give ideas as to what he would have visualized. I think his book "Dragon Teeth," Is supposed to be the story of Dr. Grants personal life or family history.
"Dragon's Teeth" is actually about the Bone Wars, as told by a Philadelphia student who goes out to the Badlands on a bet and meets the rival paleontologists Cope and Marsh.
I remember when i first saw this. it gave me so much hope and ambition to do this, i wanted to bring back extinct animals back to life so badly that i thought it was going to be my entire life. But now i'm Mangaka who draws dinosaurs and anime for a living, and looking back now... i think i would have been another john Hammond.
Anything can be trained and placed in a high security cage. Safe for our enjoyment! I love the touch of realism. Makes our imagination run wild. All the comic book movies out don't have that realism.
Cancer researcher, "It is not out of the question that in 50-100 years we could start talking about synthesizing an entire chromosome." Here we are not even 25 years later having done just that. Headlines that read 'First Synthetic Yeast Chromosome Paves Way for Designer Genomes' aren't even remarkable to the general public anymore. I remember when Dolly was made it was a huge deal with all sorts of ethical concerns. Now we're literally creating life from scratch & nobody bats an eyes. Give it another 50 years & that'll change once we start making dinosaurs from scratch.
The reason no one bats an eye today is because of the overwhelming might the media and entertainment structures hold over our now almost non existent attention spans and dopaminergic systems. In other words we're easily distracted and so saturated that we don't even care anymore and if/when we do it's not for long. Because there's already something else to be awed by. We're generally in a numb daze and as we grow more conscious as a species we somehow yearn for sedation into unconsciousness by non-stop, 24 hour, on demand, personally targeted and customized entertainment.
Bob Bakker at 14:50 - the basis for the dude in The Lost World who goes running out of the water fall and is eaten by the T-Rex haha! He's also in a really cool series of PBS documentaries I remember watching as a kid called The Dinosaurs! You can find it here on RUclips
The Velociraptors Ruled In The Original Jurassic Film And That I’ll never forget getting a chill down my spine when first watching them in this Documentary When snarling up against that kitchen window prior to watching the Movie for the first time !!!!
I'm old enough to actually miss documentaries that aren't over edited and have their sound beds crammed full of 'edgy' music and explosive sound effects.
Fun fact: dinosaurs wouldn’t be as blood thirsty in real life as they were in the movie unless Dr. Wu (or the secret true villain) made the dinosaurs overly aggressive like in the movie.
Ok: Jurassic Park tells you T-Rex vision is based on movement. Jack Horner tells you T-Rex is a scavenger (eating things that are already dead) = Fatal flow in design. He would go blind because corpses ain't moving
My question is: Whats the difference between object moving and his head moving? If he moves, his vision should refresh, making him see the world around him?
***** I have a theory that the T-Rex's vision based on movement is actually a side effect of the frog DNA used to fill in the gaps of its genetic code, the animal that existed millions of years ago never had this flaw
T-rex(just like snakes or is it?) has a vision based on movement, he will smell something that ain't moving, if it smells like blood, he will eat it, if it doesn't, i won't eat it
Damn, this stuff really looks old now...I was a kid during that era, it was mindboggling to watch dinosaurs of that kind of Jurassic Park quality on the bigscreen
This kind of thing is all very interesting, because frankly the conditions in technology are already there. It's why when I read in the news of how scientists managed to resurrect the embryo of a mastadon, I truly wonder what else they aren't telling us....for good reason.
Best not to go there. Ray trace super computers are able to do similar right now. They'll likely just say that we filed down the teeth, so there's no risk now. Debate will last decades. I seem to recall that's how science works.
Sadly, the latest research in genetics says "Not for a thousand years". Can't even make a new mammoth from frozen mammoth flesh. Mammoth DNA is TOO fragmented and contaminated, and dino DNA has never really been found. All that's left of them is stone. Even with a full mammoth sequence (which has been done)- how the hell do you make actual, viable chromosomes from it?
I find it hilarious how far off that guy was @17:47. He said 50 to 200 years to synthesize and entire chromosome. Except we've already achieved that. The entire human genome was sequenced in 2003.
@@TheJPCollection But that's what I'm saying I tried to do, rip it from the VHS to a DVD, to then copy on my computer. VHS wouldn't let me. There is no DVD version of this, which is why I was stuck there.
I remember when learning one of my favorite books, Jurassic Park, was under production with Spielberg at the helm and Jeff Goldblum as Ian Malcolm. I also remember how great was my disappointment at the film being infected with Spielberg's "politically correct" point of view, and that confirmed batchelor Ian Malcolm was portrayed as lecherous and "always on the lookout for a former Mrs. Malcolm." The dinosaurs were the best part of the movie, and the book was far and away better than the movie ever aspired to be. Kudos to Michael Crighton for a terrific story, and to Stan Winston for his dino creations! I, for one, have no desire to see something with the capability to kill me brought back to life. The tech is fascinating but lets hope it's used to benefit rather than cause harm.
The Real Jurassic Park Chapter 1- Step 1: Find dinosaur DNA Chapter 2- Step 2: Grow an embryo Chapter 3- Step 3: Raise the baby Chapter 4- Step 4: Choose a habitat Chapter 5- Step 5: Plan a diet Chapter 6- Step 6: Manage the animals Chapter 7- Are we sure we want to do this? This is just a brief summary for those who want the long story short.
First of all Jeff was still young? I think this was made in 1995? Given the advances we've had since then? I wish they would make an update to this? Are you listening? Producers of Nova?😁
I'm pretty sure the way big carnivores were depicted in Walking With Dinosaurs, as far as behavior, is accurate. While they were young, they hunted actively, but when they got to be adults, they didn't need to hunt very often. They could bully younger animals out of their meals. It's that way with lions today.
My only problem is the money aspect. I mean, sure, I'd love to see one, but sadly, my first thought is about greedy business people who want nothing but what these creatures' existences would bring them.
Things like that vaguely but surely I hear in my head sometimes ever since I seen the movie! That line is from Eddy the field tech that gets ripped in half by both T Rex in The Lost World: Jurassic Park when they are gearing up for the expedition Hammond schemed up. He was talking to his daughter as Eddy said his line over the intercom.
Not questioning this video but doesn't DNA break down so many yrs nd the missing links seem hard to replace seeing as we couldn't possibly know which one is which nd then the incubation is a huge issue if I recall seeing this from another video rebuffing this possiblity so unless u had a time machine nd could go back ten million yrs or more im no degrees majoring in any of this Field ijs thou
22 years and we've made absolutely no progress in the recreation of a dinosaur. The same idea of manipulating bird DNA id still being discussed; but not acted upon.
I am by no means a paleontologist or dinosaur expert in any way. Naturally, any observations I offer will undoubtedly be rudimentary & crudely amateurish. But I'll give it a shot regardless. In relation to the T-Rex and the many theories surrounding how it would have lived & behaved, I have a question: When you look at it's body and see how it was balanced by it's large head, spine, and strong large tail, what are the chances T-Rex fed on animals in the water? It's balance seems odd for a dominant land carnivore, but it does appear as though it would have made T-Rex a great swimmer. In fact, T-Rex appears to simply be a very large crocodile with abnormally tall hind legs. It's pathetic front limbs would seem to be a considerable weakness for a land hunter, but they would serve as an ideal feature for a swimmer who moves forward by the thrust it generates from it's mighty tail & back legs. The small front limbs would reduce drag as it is propelled forward from the back of the body, and they may also have been used to simply keep the head above water. In addition to perhaps having been a carnivore who swam to hunt, the taller hind legs remind me of certain water birds who stand in streams and strike suddenly at fish who swim around their feet. Perhaps Tyrannosaurus Rex did these things; perhaps he did all of them. I'm not saying that the T-Rex was a water dweller. No; not at all am I contending that. I'm saying although it did live on land, it may have fed on animals in the water. So, now that you've heard my take on things I have to know how wrong I am? Am I completely off-base here or what? Someone who does know the answers to these postulations would surely be appreciated. Thanks.
I gotta tell you that is actually a pretty good theory, and you are not the first one to come up with it, but some paleonthologist are afraid the way the hips of the t-rex are constructed would not allow him to swim, and tho he could have been hunting on water, I imagine him steping on the riverfloor with light flotability, waiting for some dinosaur to drink, since his fossils indicate it was indeed a carnivorous animal. When it comes to the front limbs 1-exagerated mini-size, dinosaurs like some allosaurus and carnotaurus had them much smaller, while there's also the theory that those arms served the function to "tickle" the female during mating, that way calming the much larger female and avoiding risks, just like how anacondas use thorn-like pseudolimbs to tickle their mate partner, now let's also remember we now know as a FACT that several dinosaurs had feathers, the T-rex has evidence to posses them during childhood, but is unknown if he kept them, in case he did they may have appeared in his arms, the feathers would give a fake impretion of size to the prey, however is unknown how the t-rex feathers would affect a water predator behaivor
Each of T. rex's tooth is bigger than your average freshwater fish. It's also shaped like a banana. T. rex has relatively short and thick neck, which is great to generate incredible bite force, but really bad if you want to quickly strike down to catch nimble little fish. T. rex's tail, while powerful, is very stiff so not good for swimming. T. rex is feathered, which is bad for the drag coefficiency through water. T. rex has nostrils in front of its skull. If it's a water-dweller, the nostrils would be located more towards the top/back of the skull. If you want to know what a fish-eating dinosaur looks like, google Spinosaurus or Baryonyx.
I read that those pathetic forearms were about the same size as a humans. Therefore not really weak, only look small in comparison to the bulk of the rest of the beast. Also have read they were more scavengers or ambush predators. Not that I’d want to try and outrun one. But I do wish they’d stop being portrayed as always bellowing about the place. As a matter of fact, even the herbivores are shown as bellowing, I would have thought you’d get more of an elephant type rumble
I vaguely remember watching this episode of Nova on TV. I miss the days when they focused on conveying actual information and not trying to sound like a true crime (melo)drama.
The thing is tho, based on what I've seen dinosaurs are dangerous. Like rhinos. I'm pretty against rhino zoos for that reason too..Whether it's a veggie eater or meat eater, I just tend to see dinosaurs as very lethal. I think it will take automated machines for this type of stuff?
Even if we were able to recreate dinosaurs, I don't believe they would survive very long, conditions are way too different, certainly for the larger dinosaurs the oxygen level would be too low.
I recorded this and must have watched it a million times waiting for jp to come to vhs. I was convinced dino cloning was just around the corner...what a dumbass i was
You Know I’ve always Strongly wondered about exactly how old Rexy is Along With those Two Velociraptors as well by the time that those Disastrous Events Of Jurassic Park Had Began To Be Exact ???? 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔 ????
All very interesting, and it is...but it seems to me that time and resources spent would be better suited for cures to modern diseases, etc. A lot of things started never come to fruition, and then there's one distraction and another and another. At least succeed in what would be useful now rather than a species that couldn't thrive in our current eco-system anyway.
Every predator is a scavenger, lions will scavenge for food when they can't get s fresh kill. No predator in the animal kingdom will pass up on a meal that is in front of them.
17:44 dude, you're in 1995 and you have a thing on your counter top that, however slow can make DNA. Not in a giant lab or complex machine but in something that looks like a paint tinter and is only slightly bigger than a microwave. You say all you're waiting in is better computing power? What the hell are they able to do today, the stuff that is so new and so fringe that we won't hear anything about it for years from now? Especially how any and all technologies has advanced in leaps and bounds beyond the threshold of what people in 1995 believed the possibilities were
Well lets be honest. The only thing stopping it from happening now is a scientist's budget.The fact that they openly brag about doing it with extinct species like the dodo, already tells me something in many ways. It's why I see movies like Jurassic Park more as social commentary nowadays than anything else really.
I remember seeing this in the theatre and in the scene where they saw them I had tears in my eyes at the thought that seeing a live dinosaur at their height would be an incredible experience. Of course we might not be here if large dinos were still around. Fortunately most modern dinosaurs are small.
40,000 year old permafrost worm found in Russia came back to life and reproduced. Horse found in permafrost still had blood in it.
As permafrost in northern Canada and Russia melts and exposes more and more frozen in time animals who knows what we find.
The ethical choice to bring back extinct animals for our enjoyment , not their best interest seems straight forward though.. its not like we would release them into the wild as well..
“The greatest threat to a condor is humans” I think that statement pretty much applies to everything.
Jeff Goldblum should narrate everything ever.
Imagine him narrating the google maps app while driving 😂
He was drunk as a mother when he did the first two JP films. He would often intentionally give less effort in his roles just to piss of the directors, and he would get so drunk that most of his scenes would have to be edited so you could hear his voice properly. I'm not sure every director has the patience to deal with him, Especially documentary directors.
The Jurassic Park Collection "Turn uhhh right on the uhhh next street and your destination uhhh will be on your left."
Lock Shock and Barrel Lol
Turn left and we'll uhh find a way.
Yes. Or Harrison Ford. Both would work.
This IS a proper Jurassic Park Collection, I didn't even know this existed!
Yeah I recently got it on VHS and was blown away! :D
Thanks for creating this collection man!
Ok 🙄
Jurassic Park is my all time favourite movie. I still remember seeing it in 1993. I was pregnant a the time and the baby kept on jumping in my stomach every time I got excited. In all I guess I saw the movie about 30 times. It's so sad that Michael Crichton died. He was a great writer. Bob Baker and Jack Horner are the pioneers of dinosaur research, I would surely like to meet them . Spielberg made a great movie.
That anecdote is the sweetest thing ever!! I can totally picture you in the theater ❤️️ thank you so much for sharing
Yeah... if you're a fan of T-rexes then you won't like Jack Horner. He is the one that thinks the T-rex was a little weakling that could never hunt for itself and had to scavenge everything. Oh Yeah, and he's responsible for the "spinosaurus" shown in JP///
Rip we lost a great legend
It’s my best movie too I was like 12
@@Allen-dj9kiKeep crying.
I think we need to clone Jeff Goldblum. What a guy.
He's a national treasure!
He's still alive
Ben P. Yeah boy ..luv him
Ben P. Hahahah Right?😂
@@nanuqo2006 As Goldblum himself would say: "Uh..."
I had this documentary in VHS format, I was around 3 years old when this came to my place with the Making of jurassic Park and the movie itself... Watching this makes me think the technology in that time was so developed that amused me... Now I still amused because we improved that technology and the concept of life and discovers...
I grew up watching Jurassic Park, I was 5 when I first saw it and I still love watching it, even at 34 years old. I never stopped loving those movies. That's where my love of giant lizards came from. First it was Jurassic Park, then it was Dragonheart and then Godzilla n 98. Had it not been for Jurassic Park, I probably wouldn't have watched the other two movies. This was a big part of my childhood.
You can hear Chriton's labored breathing from the cancer in these clips...... Poor dude lived a stressful life and battled cancer for a LONG time. I wish he was still here after the second movie, so he could give ideas as to what he would have visualized. I think his book "Dragon Teeth," Is supposed to be the story of Dr. Grants personal life or family history.
"Dragon's Teeth" is actually about the Bone Wars, as told by a Philadelphia student who goes out to the Badlands on a bet and meets the rival paleontologists Cope and Marsh.
I remember when i first saw this. it gave me so much hope and ambition to do this, i wanted to bring back extinct animals back to life so badly that i thought it was going to be my entire life. But now i'm Mangaka who draws dinosaurs and anime for a living, and looking back now... i think i would have been another john Hammond.
Good you took another path!
Where do you publish your work?
Jeff Goldblum can put me to sleep not in the bad way saying he's boring but he can read a story and I'd fall a sleep
"Who dung it?" Was the most brilliant poo joke I've ever heard.
+Blue Shard 😂💩
I hadn't seen this doco before.
Thank you sir!
+Bo Davidson No problem, and I'm a girl BTW 😘
The Jurassic Park Collection My sincerist apologies ma'am!
Bo Davidson
b.
Anything can be trained and placed in a high security cage. Safe for our enjoyment! I love the touch of realism. Makes our imagination run wild. All the comic book movies out don't have that realism.
I know right? ^^
This video just made my day
Cancer researcher, "It is not out of the question that in 50-100 years we could start talking about synthesizing an entire chromosome."
Here we are not even 25 years later having done just that. Headlines that read 'First Synthetic Yeast Chromosome Paves Way for Designer Genomes' aren't even remarkable to the general public anymore. I remember when Dolly was made it was a huge deal with all sorts of ethical concerns. Now we're literally creating life from scratch & nobody bats an eyes. Give it another 50 years & that'll change once we start making dinosaurs from scratch.
hazonku We'll they went into making money, with terminator seeds
The reason no one bats an eye today is because of the overwhelming might the media and entertainment structures hold over our now almost non existent attention spans and dopaminergic systems.
In other words we're easily distracted and so saturated that we don't even care anymore and if/when we do it's not for long.
Because there's already something else to be awed by.
We're generally in a numb daze and as we grow more conscious as a species we somehow yearn for sedation into unconsciousness by non-stop, 24 hour, on demand, personally targeted and customized entertainment.
@@baayzil97 OMG! YOU NAILED IT! I COULDN'T EVEN MAKE IT PAST READING YOUR FIRST PARAGRAPH. TOO MANY WORDS. SORRY!
We are re not making life from scratch are y ou u stupid?
like Jeff Goldblum said in the movie,They were so preoccupied that they could, they didnt stop to think if they should
Jeff Goldblum should narrate everything man.
The second Jeff goldblum said he played a mathamatition I stood up and yelled "CHAOTITION!!!!!!"
but he is a mathematician, who studies nonlinear equations other wise know as the chaos theory.
aidan bennett Same
Lmfao!
@Papa John You obviously missed the movie quote reference.
Bob Bakker at 14:50 - the basis for the dude in The Lost World who goes running out of the water fall and is eaten by the T-Rex haha!
He's also in a really cool series of PBS documentaries I remember watching as a kid called The Dinosaurs! You can find it here on RUclips
The Velociraptors Ruled In The Original Jurassic Film And That I’ll never forget getting a chill down my spine when first watching them in this Documentary When snarling up against that kitchen window prior to watching the Movie for the first time !!!!
Happy 25th anniversary, my favorite movie of all time!
RIP Michael Crichton + Stan Winston, both gone too soon
Never seen this one! I'm glad I subscribed! :D
Thank you for subscribing! ^^
Jurassic Park Collection
Thank you for the great content! ^^
I always like Jeff even in his other film,thanks Hasnan
I love that documentary and it's tell a story about dinosaurs from Jurassic Park.
I'm old enough to actually miss documentaries that aren't over edited and have their sound beds crammed full of 'edgy' music and explosive sound effects.
Fun fact: dinosaurs wouldn’t be as blood thirsty in real life as they were in the movie unless Dr. Wu (or the secret true villain) made the dinosaurs overly aggressive like in the movie.
Actually tou are wrong. Look at orcas. There is no record of wild killer whales attacking and killing humans but in caltivity they killed several.
They weren’t that bloodthirsty. They were literally just hungry and kinda learning to hunt properly for the first time.
The real fact is that we have no clue how an extinct animal would behave if we brought it back to life in an era it wasn’t meant to exist in
Ok
Great movie
Ok: Jurassic Park tells you T-Rex vision is based on movement. Jack Horner tells you T-Rex is a scavenger (eating things that are already dead) = Fatal flow in design. He would go blind because corpses ain't moving
SMELL
My question is: Whats the difference between object moving and his head moving?
If he moves, his vision should refresh, making him see the world around him?
***** I have a theory that the T-Rex's vision based on movement is actually a side effect of the frog DNA used to fill in the gaps of its genetic code, the animal that existed millions of years ago never had this flaw
Or are they?
T-rex(just like snakes or is it?) has a vision based on movement, he will smell something that ain't moving, if it smells like blood, he will eat it, if it doesn't, i won't eat it
I wish this PBS NOVA Documentary was available on DVD like most of my other favorite ones. 42:18 Hey I know what that is, it’s a Cuban Crocodile.
Epic movie ever
Jeff is legend
Why’d I never know about this
The greatest movie of all time, and my best favorite movie ever.
Life hasn't found a way yet Malcom
Damn, this stuff really looks old now...I was a kid during that era, it was mindboggling to watch dinosaurs of that kind of Jurassic Park quality on the bigscreen
This kind of thing is all very interesting, because frankly the conditions in technology are already there. It's why when I read in the news of how scientists managed to resurrect the embryo of a mastadon, I truly wonder what else they aren't telling us....for good reason.
Best not to go there. Ray trace super computers are able to do similar right now.
They'll likely just say that we filed down the teeth, so there's no risk now. Debate will last decades. I seem to recall that's how science works.
they aren't telling us
Dodgson Cleary fucking dipshit
If real dinasours can be created i want to be alive to see it
Diego Moreno I don't what moron would want them fucken eating machines running around
*Donna Jonas* Don't underestimate us morons and our determination
Eat you
Diego Moreno me too but only Interessted in T-REX + Spinosaurus in full size alive
Sadly, the latest research in genetics says "Not for a thousand years". Can't even make a new mammoth from frozen mammoth flesh. Mammoth DNA is TOO fragmented and contaminated, and dino DNA has never really been found. All that's left of them is stone. Even with a full mammoth sequence (which has been done)- how the hell do you make actual, viable chromosomes from it?
man watching anything from the late 90s early 2000s about dinosaurs is just waiting for the jack horner jump scare.
Remember when Nova presented contemporary scientific breakthroughs in a fair and balanced way?
I WISH ALL OF THIS IS POSSIBLE TO CREATE A REAL JURASSIC PARK WHICH WOULD BE AMAZINGLY AWESOME
I find it hilarious how far off that guy was @17:47. He said 50 to 200 years to synthesize and entire chromosome. Except we've already achieved that. The entire human genome was sequenced in 2003.
I tried copying this to a DVD, but the VHS was actually copy protected and wouldn't allow it. As Alan Grant said, how'd you do this?
sounds like macrovision anti pirate, it mucks the sync pulses up
I ripped this from the VHS actually not the DVD, so that might be why it was "easier" hehe
@@TheJPCollection But that's what I'm saying I tried to do, rip it from the VHS to a DVD, to then copy on my computer. VHS wouldn't let me. There is no DVD version of this, which is why I was stuck there.
@@MichaelParthum🤔
12:46 - :58 The book shown in the movie looks different from the one shown after the clip.
My mistake. You can see below in the book section jurassicpark.wikia.com/wiki/Alan_Grant
1:57 and now some Indonesian lunatics wanted to build "Jurassic Park" out of Rinca Island, one of the natural habitat to Komodo Dragon.
Well, I would like to tell scientists that if we will have a real Jurassic Park in the future, they would need to avoid Dennis Nedrys.
When ever I think of Jurassic Park I always think there really are infinite worlds
Given the recent discovery of soft tissue, blood cells, etc. in dinosaur bone, could the discovery of intact dinosaur DNA be far behind?
I remember when learning one of my favorite books, Jurassic Park, was under production with Spielberg at the helm and Jeff Goldblum as Ian Malcolm. I also remember how great was my disappointment at the film being infected with Spielberg's "politically correct" point of view, and that confirmed batchelor Ian Malcolm was portrayed as lecherous and "always on the lookout for a former Mrs. Malcolm."
The dinosaurs were the best part of the movie, and the book was far and away better than the movie ever aspired to be. Kudos to Michael Crighton for a terrific story, and to Stan Winston for his dino creations!
I, for one, have no desire to see something with the capability to kill me brought back to life. The tech is fascinating but lets hope it's used to benefit rather than cause harm.
And the book explains how they did it too. Which makes you realize that they didn't actually clone actual dinosaurs but they made Chimeras.
i don’t think you actually read the book because they definitely made real dinosaurs lmao
They used frog dna so that way it means they are created by humans and not by god @@bewarethemattman
The gradual replacement and take over of dna voice by Jeff goldblum .... Did anyone else think of the fly
NOPE, Not until you mentioned it.
Good call tho!
The Real Jurassic Park
Chapter 1- Step 1: Find dinosaur DNA
Chapter 2- Step 2: Grow an embryo
Chapter 3- Step 3: Raise the baby
Chapter 4- Step 4: Choose a habitat
Chapter 5- Step 5: Plan a diet
Chapter 6- Step 6: Manage the animals
Chapter 7- Are we sure we want to do this?
This is just a brief summary for those who want the long story short.
First of all Jeff was still young? I think this was made in 1995? Given the advances we've had since then? I wish they would make an update to this? Are you listening? Producers of Nova?😁
So are they going to bring back spinosaurus or what
Why do i actually think that bringing back dinosaurs is bad idea
0:56 the way he fell😂😂😂
Jurassic Park here we cone
Dinosaurs are friggin' cool!
Wow Robert Bakker and Jack Horner getting along together those were the days
They haver been getting us ready for the real Jurassic park you can bet on it!
I’m surprised that Horner and Bakker were in the same room without ripping each other apart. 🤣🤣
I'm pretty sure the way big carnivores were depicted in Walking With Dinosaurs, as far as behavior, is accurate. While they were young, they hunted actively, but when they got to be adults, they didn't need to hunt very often. They could bully younger animals out of their meals. It's that way with lions today.
Chriton and Goldblum sound almost exactly the same. I can't tell who's narrating.
My only problem is the money aspect. I mean, sure, I'd love to see one, but sadly, my first thought is about greedy business people who want nothing but what these creatures' existences would bring them.
Dr. Malcom downstairs
Things like that vaguely but surely I hear in my head sometimes ever since I seen the movie!
That line is from Eddy the field tech that gets ripped in half by both T Rex in The Lost World: Jurassic Park when they are gearing up for the expedition Hammond schemed up. He was talking to his daughter as Eddy said his line over the intercom.
Not questioning this video but doesn't DNA break down so many yrs nd the missing links seem hard to replace seeing as we couldn't possibly know which one is which nd then the incubation is a huge issue if I recall seeing this from another video rebuffing this possiblity so unless u had a time machine nd could go back ten million yrs or more im no degrees majoring in any of this Field ijs thou
22 years and we've made absolutely no progress in the recreation of a dinosaur. The same idea of manipulating bird DNA id still being discussed; but not acted upon.
THIS IS MOST LIKELY A VERY, VERY GOOD THING. DON'T GET ME WRONG. I'D LOOOOOVE TO SEE SOME DINO CRITTERS BUT.....
I'm seeing a whole lot of references to some of the props they used in the actual jurassic park that's actually used in real life.
Holy shit
I am by no means a paleontologist or dinosaur expert in any way. Naturally, any observations I offer will undoubtedly be rudimentary & crudely amateurish. But I'll give it a shot regardless. In relation to the T-Rex and the many theories surrounding how it would have lived & behaved, I have a question:
When you look at it's body and see how it was balanced by it's large head, spine, and strong large tail, what are the chances T-Rex fed on animals in the water? It's balance seems odd for a dominant land carnivore, but it does appear as though it would have made T-Rex a great swimmer. In fact, T-Rex appears to simply be a very large crocodile with abnormally tall hind legs. It's pathetic front limbs would seem to be a considerable weakness for a land hunter, but they would serve as an ideal feature for a swimmer who moves forward by the thrust it generates from it's mighty tail & back legs. The small front limbs would reduce drag as it is propelled forward from the back of the body, and they may also have been used to simply keep the head above water. In addition to perhaps having been a carnivore who swam to hunt, the taller hind legs remind me of certain water birds who stand in streams and strike suddenly at fish who swim around their feet. Perhaps Tyrannosaurus Rex did these things; perhaps he did all of them. I'm not saying that the T-Rex was a water dweller. No; not at all am I contending that. I'm saying although it did live on land, it may have fed on animals in the water.
So, now that you've heard my take on things I have to know how wrong I am? Am I completely off-base here or what? Someone who does know the answers to these postulations would surely be appreciated. Thanks.
I gotta tell you that is actually a pretty good theory, and you are not the first one to come up with it, but some paleonthologist are afraid the way the hips of the t-rex are constructed would not allow him to swim, and tho he could have been hunting on water, I imagine him steping on the riverfloor with light flotability, waiting for some dinosaur to drink, since his fossils indicate it was indeed a carnivorous animal. When it comes to the front limbs 1-exagerated mini-size, dinosaurs like some allosaurus and carnotaurus had them much smaller, while there's also the theory that those arms served the function to "tickle" the female during mating, that way calming the much larger female and avoiding risks, just like how anacondas use thorn-like pseudolimbs to tickle their mate partner, now let's also remember we now know as a FACT that several dinosaurs had feathers, the T-rex has evidence to posses them during childhood, but is unknown if he kept them, in case he did they may have appeared in his arms, the feathers would give a fake impretion of size to the prey, however is unknown how the t-rex feathers would affect a water predator behaivor
I an just picture Rexy dog paddling through the water...
Each of T. rex's tooth is bigger than your average freshwater fish. It's also shaped like a banana.
T. rex has relatively short and thick neck, which is great to generate incredible bite force, but really bad if you want to quickly strike down to catch nimble little fish.
T. rex's tail, while powerful, is very stiff so not good for swimming.
T. rex is feathered, which is bad for the drag coefficiency through water.
T. rex has nostrils in front of its skull. If it's a water-dweller, the nostrils would be located more towards the top/back of the skull.
If you want to know what a fish-eating dinosaur looks like, google Spinosaurus or Baryonyx.
I read that those pathetic forearms were about the same size as a humans. Therefore not really weak, only look small in comparison to the bulk of the rest of the beast. Also have read they were more scavengers or ambush predators. Not that I’d want to try and outrun one. But I do wish they’d stop being portrayed as always bellowing about the place. As a matter of fact, even the herbivores are shown as bellowing, I would have thought you’d get more of an elephant type rumble
T. rex definitely hunted live prey. Many hadrosaur and trike fossils have T. rex bite marks that healed.
I vaguely remember watching this episode of Nova on TV. I miss the days when they focused on conveying actual information and not trying to sound like a true crime (melo)drama.
Only problem... DNA has a maximum life span with ultimate conditions of surviving 5 milion years...
Phillip Currie and his haircut
There's a saying😊 it's old but, it sure is good👍
+Larry Whittington Oooohhh yeah! 😀
+Larry Whittington Oooohhh yeah! 😀
The thing is tho, based on what I've seen dinosaurs are dangerous.
Like rhinos. I'm pretty against rhino zoos for that reason too..Whether it's a veggie eater or meat eater, I just tend to see dinosaurs as very lethal. I think it will take automated machines for this type of stuff?
I miss the 90's.
Same 😞 kcuF the overrated 80's
The raptors are my favorite in the 1st movie
Really? Wow you must be the only one
Its Nice❤️👍
Good realistic science presented here from 1993. Genetic engineering versus ethics.
Hosted by Ian Malcolm. Yes ik Jeff is ian
you forgot the 17,000 year old T -Rex DNA
Even if we were able to recreate dinosaurs, I don't believe they would survive very long, conditions are way too different, certainly for the larger dinosaurs the oxygen level would be too low.
They don't have full DNA strands, so won't they create hybrids/mutants? Or I'm I missing something?
+dangkoen Yeah, in the book they explain that most dinos are hybrids because of the filling of frog, avian and reptile DNA
I recorded this and must have watched it a million times waiting for jp to come to vhs. I was convinced dino cloning was just around the corner...what a dumbass i was
I love dinosaurs 🦕 I wish they can back to life
Please, upload tha making of Jurassic park 1995 hosted by James earl Jones documentary.
You Know I’ve always Strongly wondered about exactly how old Rexy is Along With those Two Velociraptors as well by the time that those Disastrous Events Of Jurassic Park Had Began To Be Exact ????
🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔 ????
Wait a second.. what does he say at 43:31?
shit samples
+Trev C He obviously says "shit."
That isn't Goldblum. There wasn't a single stutter in there!
Fuck yeah thanks for posting man~
+Stank Planks Skateboarding No problem ^^
Is this shareable?
Absolutely
All very interesting, and it is...but it seems to me that time and resources spent would be better suited for cures to modern diseases, etc. A lot of things started never come to fruition, and then there's one distraction and another and another. At least succeed in what would be useful now rather than a species that couldn't thrive in our current eco-system anyway.
Trex also ate things that are alive and just kills it.Scientests don't know if T-rex was a scavenger.
Every predator is a scavenger, lions will scavenge for food when they can't get s fresh kill. No predator in the animal kingdom will pass up on a meal that is in front of them.
bro made a whole movie
17:44 dude, you're in 1995 and you have a thing on your counter top that, however slow can make DNA. Not in a giant lab or complex machine but in something that looks like a paint tinter and is only slightly bigger than a microwave. You say all you're waiting in is better computing power? What the hell are they able to do today, the stuff that is so new and so fringe that we won't hear anything about it for years from now? Especially how any and all technologies has advanced in leaps and bounds beyond the threshold of what people in 1995 believed the possibilities were
Its one thing to grow a dinosaur in 10 yrs but a prehistoric tree?
Please make T-REX + Spinosaurus full alive size, imagin a full size Spinosaurus coming at you
"this is how you play God" :Alan grant
I of course we should make Jurassic Park. because we have better security systems and big guns.
Well lets be honest. The only thing stopping it from happening now is a scientist's budget.The fact that they openly brag about doing it with extinct species like the dodo, already tells me something in many ways. It's why I see movies like Jurassic Park more as social commentary nowadays than anything else really.
@@dodgsoncleary5003 the dodo is no prehistoric. It is actually modern. 1800s was when they went extinct.
If we do wanna extract DNA we gotta work now !
Super Craft That's my goal, :)
No no no. Give them feed. Engineer a feed for the dinos, skip the plants