I’ll give Coppola credit - he’s in his 80s and he goes out selling his wine empire to fund his dream pic - Lucas has 5 billion and sits on his ass and Spielberg just churns subpar out material.
@@jramz5176 those are the examples you use? A remake and a movie where Spielberg builds a shrine to himself, bravo. Yeah, they’re far superior to The Holdovers, Everything Everywhere All At Once, Dredd, the Nice Guys, the Drop, Redbelt, and scores of other films in the last twenty years.
@@slightrebellionoffmadison never said they were better than any of those (and they are better than some), His West Side Story is better than the original imo. Must have tortured you to see that he was given director nominations and both were best picture noms. But yes he churns out "sub par" material.
@@jramz5176 ah yes because award ceremonies where Hollywood circle jerks itself is the true measure of quality. It’s not a popularity contest by any means.
Hearts of Darkness is an excellent documentary; the 1979 version of Apocalypse Now is a masterpiece. Coppola also took on Hollywood with Zoetrope and he has now secured a place for Megalopolis at Cannes where it is entering the competition.
Have you seen the Documentary Making Apocalypse Now on RUclips by CinemaTyler? Very interesting and insightful! Easy Riders Raging Bulls is a Great book which covers the Start Highs n Lows of the Golden Era of Film making which ended with Heavens Gate! Another Great read is The Kid Stays In The Picture which is a Bio of Robert Evans, who was a Legend Producer n Head of Paramount with Rosemary's Baby The Godfather Chinatown etc! Cheers 🍻
I think the "building" represents Coppola's career and the "old guard" is the studio. An artist wants to build something original while the studio tries to control or destroy it.
Amazing vid! Honestly was very concerned with Megalopolis but it actually sounds more insane and fun than I thought. Im really just happy that its finally getting released lmao
Megalopolis is Coppola's THERAPY movie. It's like him sat in the chair discussing EVERYTHING that has meaning for him/happened to him / subconscious and we the audience are his Therapists.
Thanks for the great explanation and overview! And yep, Coppola has always been attuned to that tension between creativity and our more ancient, primitive natures, which it sounds like he's exploring once again in Megalopolis. Or as he said way back in 1979 following the release of Apocalypse Now, "Perhaps what the film (Apocalypse Now) cries for the most is for us to be governed by intelligence, creativity, and friendliness, so that we can walk the tightrope between primitive man which is in us, and the godly man.”
This is without a doubt the most interesting and cohesive explanation I've yet heard about Coppola's magnum opus. Kudos are definitely in order. Yet as much as I dearly want his labor of love to be a hit, according to your notes it's polarizing qualities may prevent this from ever happening. As in all films, there are often two conflicting issues, art (the story) and commerce (the profits), and often times "never the twain shall meet." Still, as with millions of other Coppola fans who wait with breathless anticipation, I hope for the best.
It appears that Forest Whitaker was replaced by Giancarlo Esposito, per IMDB. The soundtrack was composed by Osvaldo Golijov and Grace VanderWaal, should be interesting to hear the music for the film. So Grace VanderWaal not only acts in film, but composed some of the songs as well. FFC on one of his social media accounts praised Grace VanderWaal, Dec. 8, 2023.
not only was it written in a different time, but it was written within the context of a dystopian future. so the "problematic" aspects of it aren't flaws. and how plaza's character is described isn't inherently sexual. it's a significant factor, but so is her brilliance. all things considered, it makes sense
Another man becomes a god fantasy. Sims City with the Fountainhead blended. Looks like a fun trainwreck. This seems unoriginal and tragic for Coppola, his studio, and his reputation.
@@fantasyfilmball, none of Francis Ford Coppola's movies are on my list of favorite 370 movies, but he does have some good ones. 1) "The Godfather" - a series with 2 amazing movies in the top 400 for sure. 2) "Bram Stoker's Dracula - having Winona Ryder (one of my favorite female actors) 3) "Patton" - which my cousin loves 4) "Apocalypse Now" - loved by our culture 5) "Peggy Sue got Married" and now this looks amazing... ruclips.net/video/RU1QyAYa60g/видео.html
I have Megalopolis getting a lone cinematography nomination. Does that seem right to you? I feel like the Academy will only go for one sci fi film so it’s between Dune 2, Megalopolis, and Mickey 17
I'd say Costumes and Production Design are both more likely than Cinematography. If it gets in anywhere, the design elements seem likely based on the scale of what they built for the movie. To be fair though, they can definitely go for more than one sci-fi, as shown in 2022 (EEAAO and Avatar + Top Gun, which isn't sci-fi but is a big blockbuster action movie), or 2015 (The Martian and Mad Max). Doesn't happen often, but it can happen. Plus, Mickey 17 is next year! So that's one to scratch off the list.
Its Coppola last film and his dreal project ic its good its getting a ton of noms then it might get 0 wins like Scorsese films usually do but he is definitely getting invited go to party in a big way.
Totally understandable. The Godfather is my favorite movie of all time. But let’s be real, Coppola has not had a great Oscar worthy movie come out since Apocalypse Now in 1979. So based on his track record I wouldn’t say Megalopolis is a sure bet for a bunch of nominations
Imagine there’s talk happening behind the scenes and George Lucas is convincing Disney to distribute Megalopolis for Francis as lowkey payback for butchering Star Wars.
Everything is misogyny nowadays, both if you appreciate and if you don't appreciate "feminine allure", or if you appreciate or don't appreciate anything about women general.
@@magnuskarlsson8655 Everything is misogynistic, racist, homophobic, antisemitic, transphobic and whatever else rhetoric people invent to excuse their failure to cope and take account for themselves.
I've got a disagree about Francis Ford Coppola leaving his talent in the 1970s. To me the Bram stoker's Dracula is like the godfather of horror movies.. I love good horror movies.. but that film felt huge when it came out.. the film felt brilliantly directed..
When I first saw the movie announced I thought it could be similar to “Metropolis”. And after this, I guess it might be like it, but from the perspective of the elite. Interesting
My thoughts exactly !! He's so not easy on the eyes and I find him boring 😮 it sounds like the best character will be Shia LaBeoufs ! You just know he's going to bring it . I'm looking forward to it
What you are not aware of in terms of your analysis of this script...and the pedophile cancel culture theme...is that director/writer/producer Victor Salva, a longtime collaborator of Coppola's (see "Jeepers Creepers", it's sequels, and another film that years prior led to Salva's downfall) is a convicted pedophile...but Coppola continued working with him anyway for decades...and made Salva a multimillionaire therein. The question is why? Coppola has not answered said question. Salva also made a pedophile accepting film. What is Coppola trying to say here with his new film...and why is Coppola so close to Salva? Certainly there are other filmmakers that he could have worked with once Salva got exposed as a pedophile during a film that Salva and Coppola were filming.
I already felt the movie sounded just really out of touch hollywood. The females are one dimensional the men have all the substance and the movie is about separating shitty people from their art like this just sounds about right for a person who works in the Hollywood industry to make.
Great video! A real gem in a sea of ai voiced click bait nonsense. And this film....wow, some problematic actors for sure lol. But I am intrigued in how the movie will explore these themes.
Nice video, although I stopped it at 21:38. 😀 There have been a lot of articles about _Megapolis_ this week since Coppola is looking for a distributor at Cannes. I’ve been looking for more information and found your video. So, just wanted to say thanks for the background info. From the official photos that have been released the costumes look great but I can’t tell anything else. I’ll be back in a couple weeks to watch the rest of your video.
this sounds like it could be a really good movie. The details of the movie are disturbing at times... but this is not our world. it is a different world of a different time. the rules of their world do not need to be our rules of our world. I have read books that do something similar and the result was amazing. I remember books like "We" and "Brave New World" built their worlds in a non traditional fashin.
It sounds like The Fountainhead plus a lot of disgusting behavior and a large body count. I have never seen Aubrey Plaza look worse with box office poison king Adam Driver. This will be the flop of the decade.
I enjoyed your video very much. You are very knowledgeable about movies and this film without talking down to people like myself that don't really know as much. That being said, I will not be seeing this film. Reducing women to menial sex objects just annoys me too bad. I read another review that said that the sexism made the final cut.
I didn't know it was sexist to call women "brilliant" and also desired, beautiful and sexy. Perhaps if you ONLY characterized women as desired, beautiful, and sexy, but he clearly didn't. Also: Even simply characterizing women in a script as desired, beautiful and sexy is not sexist if it's done in a context where their male counterparts are, in a corresponding sexist way, reduced to success objects (as opposed to sex objects) where their human value is reduced to their mate value as corresponding to their socio-economic status. That would be balanced (in)equality, as opposed to sexism against women.
Before you got to it, I knew you were gonna say something about pedos. Everything is these days. They're either getting called out or they're calling themselves out. And for some reason, they always seem to be the biggest/best directors. And they allude to this behavior in their films. 🤔🤫 I LOVE films. I'm heartbroken by what my research suggests though.
Of course not every director is in charge of casting their movies. Producers, investors, studios, all interfere. But in this case, Francis is using his own money, so doesn't have to answer to anyone. He could cast, and hopefully did, cast actors because they were genuinely perfect for the roles. Nobody else will do. Reputations and rumours all go out the window if someone is absolutely right. Even a git like Shia LeBeouf.
if your screenplay is pretty much the film, and i think it very well might be. The one thing that I think you might need to do before "reviewing it" is read about Greek and Roman "movies".. er plays and myths from that age. If being woke and anti woke within a 20 year span triggers your sensilblities and those of the tik toc gen, then go watch Caligula or the last days of sodom ;) films that shocked in the 70s.;) anyhow. i see lots of parallels to The Foluntainhead and Metropolis as well. you should check them out. ones a sci fgi film. THE OG sci fi film. the other had a film made, but is Ayn Rands better fable
I dI’m getting atlas shrugged. The lead character is talking about a new kind of material that’s supposed to make for a better world, but people are fighting against it, which is very Atlas shrugged.
Watched a big chunk of your video not the whole thing… But learn how to pronounce the directors name. It’s Coppola… Cope-a-la. Not cop. And that’s when I met him and the people around him, pronounced his name.
Art revolving around "anti-cancel-culture" is the same as "anti anti- cancel culture", it depends of the context and how it's executed. When unfunny hacks like Bill Maher or Jerry Seinfeld do bits on the subject - it's cringe inducing, however when Dave Chappell does it - despite being pretty damn controversial, (to say the least), it's tolerable due to the fact that it's usually pretty hilarious most of the time. Which is also the case when it comes to chud-dunking or even possibly worse. By worse i mean, that there are fewer instances of it that aren't pretensions and cringe-worthy. That's due to the fact that it's been done to death, but more importantly it also to me feels like low-hanging fruit. There is one area of anti-cancel culture that is extremely relevant currently, the being the crackdown on Palestinian-solidarity protestors including the doxing of students and the black-list circulating among corporate elites in fields like banking and law-offices seeking to prevent the hiring of students who've been identified as having participated in these protests on Ivy-League college campuses post October 7th. Pro-Palestine activists have been the original victims of cancel culture, dating back before the concept had even came into usage in common parlance, (side note: aint it funny how hacks like the formentioned Maher and Seinfeld not only have nothing to say about those people being "canceled," they are the ones who are in fact actually advocating for them to be canceled). So art revolving around that would be timely and sorely needed. Anyways, sorry for the rant, like i said - it all depends on the context and the execution. So based on the specific events you discussed that are potentially gunna be in this film that are meant to serve as commentary on cancel-culture... yeah.... I'm not sure how well that's gunna land lol
Ugh why is Shia Labeouf in this? Why can't we get new actors or even middle of the road actors? I don't even fully care about his shit I just want some new faces. Also I do care it's just not why I was initially pissed.
I watched a lot of unheard of movies this past year to see if there were some actors you could say will be big in a few years. In the end I had to admit I just watch a lot of B movies.
This movie should never had been made! It’s an abomination! You’ll chuckle at the stupidity! Zero subtext! All on the nose! It’s like a bad AI screenplay!
@@thornbird6768 Yes, in Cannes. I was beyond excited to get a ticket, I had the perfect seat and then the movie melted my eyeballs! I was so disappointed! A few people left the theatre, others chuckled throughout ( I had to laugh or I would have slashed my wrists ) but I was just left dead by how bad it was. Really sad reality.
Sounds like a bizarro mishmash of Fritz Lang’s Metropolis, The Fountainhead and The Great Gatsby.
I was thinking the very same thing spot on friend
Yep that sounds pretty accurate
The Bonfire of the Vanities
@@d3nza482dear god don’t let it be that bad. That movie took a great book and shit on it.
It sounds like a retelling of the Catilinarian conspiracy from the point of view of Lucius Sergius Catilina. But we shall see.
I’ll give Coppola credit - he’s in his 80s and he goes out selling his wine empire to fund his dream pic - Lucas has 5 billion and sits on his ass and Spielberg just churns subpar out material.
FF Coppola and John Williams are workers at heart.
If West Side Story and Fabelmans are Sub par then I'm assuming you must hate everything you watch nowadays
@@jramz5176 those are the examples you use? A remake and a movie where Spielberg builds a shrine to himself, bravo.
Yeah, they’re far superior to The Holdovers, Everything Everywhere All At Once, Dredd, the Nice Guys, the Drop, Redbelt, and scores of other films in the last twenty years.
@@slightrebellionoffmadison never said they were better than any of those (and they are better than some), His West Side Story is better than the original imo. Must have tortured you to see that he was given director nominations and both were best picture noms. But yes he churns out "sub par" material.
@@jramz5176 ah yes because award ceremonies where Hollywood circle jerks itself is the true measure of quality. It’s not a popularity contest by any means.
Starting to actually talk about the movie at 7 minutes.
Thanks!
It’s beyond annoying to have to sit through 7 min of introductory verbose prior to actual content….
Hearts of Darkness is an excellent documentary; the 1979 version of Apocalypse Now is a masterpiece. Coppola also took on Hollywood with Zoetrope and he has now secured a place for Megalopolis at Cannes where it is entering the competition.
Have you seen the Documentary Making Apocalypse Now on RUclips by CinemaTyler? Very interesting and insightful! Easy Riders Raging Bulls is a Great book which covers the Start Highs n Lows of the Golden Era of Film making which ended with Heavens Gate! Another Great read is The Kid Stays In The Picture which is a Bio of Robert Evans, who was a Legend Producer n Head of Paramount with Rosemary's Baby The Godfather Chinatown etc! Cheers 🍻
I think the "building" represents Coppola's career and the "old guard" is the studio. An artist wants to build something original while the studio tries to control or destroy it.
A cynical world just waiting to shit over Francis head. This is the only act i see coming... I really hope the best for him.
Amazing vid! Honestly was very concerned with Megalopolis but it actually sounds more insane and fun than I thought. Im really just happy that its finally getting released lmao
Megalopolis is Coppola's THERAPY movie. It's like him sat in the chair discussing EVERYTHING that has meaning for him/happened to him / subconscious and we the audience are his Therapists.
Thanks for the great explanation and overview! And yep, Coppola has always been attuned to that tension between creativity and our more ancient, primitive natures, which it sounds like he's exploring once again in Megalopolis.
Or as he said way back in 1979 following the release of Apocalypse Now, "Perhaps what the film (Apocalypse Now) cries for the most is for us to be governed by intelligence, creativity, and friendliness, so that we can walk the tightrope between primitive man which is in us, and the godly man.”
This is without a doubt the most interesting and cohesive explanation I've yet heard about Coppola's magnum opus. Kudos are definitely in order. Yet as much as I dearly want his labor of love to be a hit, according to your notes it's polarizing qualities may prevent this from ever happening. As in all films, there are often two conflicting issues, art (the story) and commerce (the profits), and often times "never the twain shall meet." Still, as with millions of other Coppola fans who wait with breathless anticipation, I hope for the best.
This was my first video from you, loved it!
Francis posted some books on his Instagram that inspired him and many of them are recent, so I think a lot of this script has been changed.
It’s a great list of books.
This all reminds me of Synecdoche New York
Good call. Was thinking Caligula set in present day, but yours sounds accurate.
Synecdoche New York didn’t have nearly as much hype around it coming out. It came out as virtually a surprise.
@@esyphillis101 Fair. I meant more like the story within the film
It sounds both brilliant and completely nuts at the same time.
I like the weird and wonderful , sounds good to me , plus no doubt Shia LaBeouf will knock it out of the ball park 😊 great actor .
First time watcher here and i have to say this is such a good video 👍 deserving of a sub
Very cool idea for a vid -thank you for posting …I’d watch more like this ❤
Sounds fuckin awesome can't wait to see it... Thanks for this.
It appears that Forest Whitaker was replaced by Giancarlo Esposito, per IMDB. The soundtrack was composed by Osvaldo Golijov and Grace VanderWaal, should be interesting to hear the music for the film. So Grace VanderWaal not only acts in film, but composed some of the songs as well. FFC on one of his social media accounts praised Grace VanderWaal, Dec. 8, 2023.
And to think she started her career basically from America’s Got Talent🤯
not only was it written in a different time, but it was written within the context of a dystopian future. so the "problematic" aspects of it aren't flaws. and how plaza's character is described isn't inherently sexual. it's a significant factor, but so is her brilliance. all things considered, it makes sense
Thanks so much for this vid!!
Is that a Hundreds of Beavers shirt?! One of my favorite films I’ve seen this year.
Yessir, bought it at the unofficial TIFF screening back in September. Hundreds of Beavers is incredible.
One From The Heart is a beautiful masterpiece.
It is a great artistic movie, a great example of Coppola as an auteur
I always thought Tucker and Rainmaker were Coppola's most entertaining films post Apocalypse Now.
Sounds like it has elements of "The Fountainhead".
I was getting “Atlas Shrugged”. Hoping it’s not a Libertarian love fest.
I feel like Megalon will be compared to something like Vibranium
Thank you for this video. Rumble Fish is one of my favorite films. Unpopular Opinion, I know. You have a nice day, Bro.
RUMBLE FISH for me is his best movie to date. An amazingly original piece of moviemaking.
Another man becomes a god fantasy. Sims City with the Fountainhead blended. Looks like a fun trainwreck. This seems unoriginal and tragic for Coppola, his studio, and his reputation.
Banger again as always
Would love this for Blitz!
@@latissimusdomsi Thank you! If someone can get me the Blitz screenplay, I'm on it right away.
@@fantasyfilmball, none of Francis Ford Coppola's movies are on my list of favorite 370 movies, but he does have some good ones.
1) "The Godfather" - a series with 2 amazing movies in the top 400 for sure.
2) "Bram Stoker's Dracula - having Winona Ryder (one of my favorite female actors)
3) "Patton" - which my cousin loves
4) "Apocalypse Now" - loved by our culture
5) "Peggy Sue got Married"
and now this looks amazing...
ruclips.net/video/RU1QyAYa60g/видео.html
Why is nobody saying that megalopolis is just a rip off of Metropolis. Because that’s what it is. Minus you know the imagination and commentary.
I have Megalopolis getting a lone cinematography nomination. Does that seem right to you? I feel like the Academy will only go for one sci fi film so it’s between Dune 2, Megalopolis, and Mickey 17
I'd say Costumes and Production Design are both more likely than Cinematography. If it gets in anywhere, the design elements seem likely based on the scale of what they built for the movie.
To be fair though, they can definitely go for more than one sci-fi, as shown in 2022 (EEAAO and Avatar + Top Gun, which isn't sci-fi but is a big blockbuster action movie), or 2015 (The Martian and Mad Max). Doesn't happen often, but it can happen.
Plus, Mickey 17 is next year! So that's one to scratch off the list.
Mickey 17 got pushed to 2025, so it’s not gonna be in competition
Its Coppola last film and his dreal project ic its good its getting a ton of noms then it might get 0 wins like Scorsese films usually do but he is definitely getting invited go to party in a big way.
Totally understandable. The Godfather is my favorite movie of all time. But let’s be real, Coppola has not had a great Oscar worthy movie come out since Apocalypse Now in 1979. So based on his track record I wouldn’t say Megalopolis is a sure bet for a bunch of nominations
Given this year looking way less stacked this year. I think megalopolis could get some nominations. Though that depends on how things fold out.
Imagine there’s talk happening behind the scenes and George Lucas is convincing Disney to distribute Megalopolis for Francis as lowkey payback for butchering Star Wars.
It's not misogynistic to appreciate feminine allure.
Exactly. Most women appreciate it when they're appreciated for that.
Everything is misogyny nowadays, both if you appreciate and if you don't appreciate "feminine allure", or if you appreciate or don't appreciate anything about women general.
@@magnuskarlsson8655
Everything is misogynistic, racist, homophobic, antisemitic, transphobic and whatever else rhetoric people invent to excuse their failure to cope and take account for themselves.
@@SpFlash1523no they don't
If it's the only character arc than yes it's a problem. The character is flat and one dimension.
Great video BTW!
I've got a disagree about Francis Ford Coppola leaving his talent in the 1970s. To me the Bram stoker's Dracula is like the godfather of horror movies.. I love good horror movies.. but that film felt huge when it came out.. the film felt brilliantly directed..
The clip that was recently released made it seem like it's a movie about a guy who can control time. Was this present in the script you read?
Yeah very small part
When I first saw the movie announced I thought it could be similar to “Metropolis”. And after this, I guess it might be like it, but from the perspective of the elite. Interesting
As someone else pointed out, it was both written in a different time and as a dystopia. The problematic elements could be intentional.
Why Adam driver though ?
My thoughts exactly !! He's so not easy on the eyes and I find him boring 😮 it sounds like the best character will be Shia LaBeoufs ! You just know he's going to bring it . I'm looking forward to it
What you are not aware of in terms of your analysis of this script...and the pedophile cancel culture theme...is that director/writer/producer Victor Salva, a longtime collaborator of Coppola's (see "Jeepers Creepers", it's sequels, and another film that years prior led to Salva's downfall) is a convicted pedophile...but Coppola continued working with him anyway for decades...and made Salva a multimillionaire therein. The question is why? Coppola has not answered said question.
Salva also made a pedophile accepting film.
What is Coppola trying to say here with his new film...and why is Coppola so close to Salva? Certainly there are other filmmakers that he could have worked with once Salva got exposed as a pedophile during a film that Salva and Coppola were filming.
I already felt the movie sounded just really out of touch hollywood. The females are one dimensional the men have all the substance and the movie is about separating shitty people from their art like this just sounds about right for a person who works in the Hollywood industry to make.
Well, he got an awesome actor to play in it (Adam Driver), so I'm definitely gonna watch it
Nice vid. Thanks
21:54-21:58 To be fair, so did Alex Jones.
Great video! A real gem in a sea of ai voiced click bait nonsense. And this film....wow, some problematic actors for sure lol. But I am intrigued in how the movie will explore these themes.
Thanks for watching! Much appreciated!
Nice video, although I stopped it at 21:38. 😀 There have been a lot of articles about _Megapolis_ this week since Coppola is looking for a distributor at Cannes. I’ve been looking for more information and found your video. So, just wanted to say thanks for the background info.
From the official photos that have been released the costumes look great but I can’t tell anything else. I’ll be back in a couple weeks to watch the rest of your video.
this sounds like it could be a really good movie. The details of the movie are disturbing at times... but this is not our world. it is a different world of a different time. the rules of their world do not need to be our rules of our world. I have read books that do something similar and the result was amazing. I remember books like "We" and "Brave New World" built their worlds in a non traditional fashin.
Sounds more like he predicted 9/11 and the 2020 riots than jan 6th.
Thanks bro!
It sounds like The Fountainhead plus a lot of disgusting behavior and a large body count. I have never seen Aubrey Plaza look worse with box office poison king Adam Driver. This will be the flop of the decade.
Great!
Looks like this is going to be either a masterpiece or a total junk. I'm getting excited to see it though!
John Voight is a great actor and a great man.
What is the complaint?
He’s one of the few unapologetic big Trump supporters in Hollywood
YIKES a woman is described as beautiful
The whole video is so.
Anti Woke crowd, jesus, can't anyone just enjoy or mull over an interesting, new, bizarre film from a classic director like Coppola.
Have you read about Victor Salva and his involvement with Coppola?
I will look into that.
Aubrey Plaza is stunning as a blond, but then again as she got older she got stunning period.
I enjoyed your video very much. You are very knowledgeable about movies and this film without talking down to people like myself that don't really know as much. That being said, I will not be seeing this film. Reducing women to menial sex objects just annoys me too bad. I read another review that said that the sexism made the final cut.
My man where did you read that script?
It's on archive.org, the link to the script is in the bio!
@@fantasyfilmball thanks man, great video, new subscriber here
I didn't know it was sexist to call women "brilliant" and also desired, beautiful and sexy. Perhaps if you ONLY characterized women as desired, beautiful, and sexy, but he clearly didn't. Also: Even simply characterizing women in a script as desired, beautiful and sexy is not sexist if it's done in a context where their male counterparts are, in a corresponding sexist way, reduced to success objects (as opposed to sex objects) where their human value is reduced to their mate value as corresponding to their socio-economic status. That would be balanced (in)equality, as opposed to sexism against women.
Agreed. Context is everything.
More of a TV series than a movie :-)
Before you got to it, I knew you were gonna say something about pedos. Everything is these days. They're either getting called out or they're calling themselves out. And for some reason, they always seem to be the biggest/best directors. And they allude to this behavior in their films. 🤔🤫 I LOVE films. I'm heartbroken by what my research suggests though.
What garbage.
How is her character being described as beautiful misogynistic? Lol
He's into dudes
Really interesting video! Well done!
Of course not every director is in charge of casting their movies. Producers, investors, studios, all interfere. But in this case, Francis is using his own money, so doesn't have to answer to anyone. He could cast, and hopefully did, cast actors because they were genuinely perfect for the roles. Nobody else will do. Reputations and rumours all go out the window if someone is absolutely right. Even a git like Shia LeBeouf.
if your screenplay is pretty much the film, and i think it very well might be. The one thing that I think you might need to do before "reviewing it" is read about Greek and Roman "movies".. er plays and myths from that age. If being woke and anti woke within a 20 year span triggers your sensilblities and those of the tik toc gen, then go watch Caligula or the last days of sodom ;) films that shocked in the 70s.;) anyhow. i see lots of parallels to The Foluntainhead and Metropolis as well. you should check them out. ones a sci fgi film. THE OG sci fi film. the other had a film made, but is Ayn Rands better fable
You haven’t seen Megalopolis yet
Great video,
Please read ‘Mickey7’ and let us know what’s up with it
Great video but you’re so off base about cancel culture it’s not even close lmao.
Cuz he was in star wars, man. C'mon, bro!
Cicero,! and Caesar. Hamhanded much.!?😂
Coppola's version of Ayn Rand's Fountainhead?
More like the communist version of The Fountainhead from what was described, which sounds exciting honestly
I dI’m getting atlas shrugged. The lead character is talking about a new kind of material that’s supposed to make for a better world, but people are fighting against it, which is very Atlas shrugged.
Watched a big chunk of your video not the whole thing… But learn how to pronounce the directors name. It’s Coppola… Cope-a-la. Not cop. And that’s when I met him and the people around him, pronounced his name.
Boooo! Booo! You're one of them... jk lol, everyone pronounces my name wrong, I get it brother !
Art revolving around "anti-cancel-culture" is the same as "anti anti- cancel culture", it depends of the context and how it's executed. When unfunny hacks like Bill Maher or Jerry Seinfeld do bits on the subject - it's cringe inducing, however when Dave Chappell does it - despite being pretty damn controversial, (to say the least), it's tolerable due to the fact that it's usually pretty hilarious most of the time. Which is also the case when it comes to chud-dunking or even possibly worse. By worse i mean, that there are fewer instances of it that aren't pretensions and cringe-worthy. That's due to the fact that it's been done to death, but more importantly it also to me feels like low-hanging fruit. There is one area of anti-cancel culture that is extremely relevant currently, the being the crackdown on Palestinian-solidarity protestors including the doxing of students and the black-list circulating among corporate elites in fields like banking and law-offices seeking to prevent the hiring of students who've been identified as having participated in these protests on Ivy-League college campuses post October 7th. Pro-Palestine activists have been the original victims of cancel culture, dating back before the concept had even came into usage in common parlance, (side note: aint it funny how hacks like the formentioned Maher and Seinfeld not only have nothing to say about those people being "canceled," they are the ones who are in fact actually advocating for them to be canceled). So art revolving around that would be timely and sorely needed. Anyways, sorry for the rant, like i said - it all depends on the context and the execution. So based on the specific events you discussed that are potentially gunna be in this film that are meant to serve as commentary on cancel-culture... yeah.... I'm not sure how well that's gunna land lol
Hate to be the one to say this, but take a break from media for a while.
@@tomverlaine728 lol
Was kinda shocked you rated the movie against his past movies before you've seen it.
He rated the screenplay
IMDB has listed the major actors characters names.
lol this beta.
Ugh why is Shia Labeouf in this? Why can't we get new actors or even middle of the road actors? I don't even fully care about his shit I just want some new faces. Also I do care it's just not why I was initially pissed.
He puts butts in theatre seats.
I watched a lot of unheard of movies this past year to see if there were some actors you could say will be big in a few years. In the end I had to admit I just watch a lot of B movies.
Shia LaBeouf knows how to bring it 😊 he wouldn't be in the movie if not !
megalon = vibranium
This movie should never had been made! It’s an abomination! You’ll chuckle at the stupidity! Zero subtext! All on the nose! It’s like a bad AI screenplay!
Did you see it
Were you at Cannes ?
@@thornbird6768 Yes
@@Andrew-of8uq Yep, back in May. I mean I love Coppola but this is just bonkers!
@@thornbird6768 Yes, in Cannes. I was beyond excited to get a ticket, I had the perfect seat and then the movie melted my eyeballs! I was so disappointed! A few people left the theatre, others chuckled throughout ( I had to laugh or I would have slashed my wrists ) but I was just left dead by how bad it was. Really sad reality.
Zzzzz